DOCSLIB.ORG

Muntries the Domestication and Improvement of Kunzea Pomifera (F.Muell.)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Muntries the Domestication and Improvement of Kunzea Pomifera (F.Muell.) Muntries The domestication and improvement of Kunzea pomifera (F.Muell.) A report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation by Tony Page January 2004 RIRDC Publication No 03/127 RIRDC Project No UM-52A © 2004 Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. All rights reserved. ISBN 0 0642 58693 4 ISSN 1440-6845 Muntries: The domestication and improvement of Kunzea pomifera (F.Muell) Publication No. 03/127 Project No: UM-52A The views expressed and the conclusions reached in this publication are those of the author and not necessarily those of persons consulted. RIRDC shall not be responsible in any way whatsoever to any person who relies in whole or in part on the contents of this report. This publication is copyright. However, RIRDC encourages wide dissemination of its research, providing the Corporation is clearly acknowledged. For any other enquiries concerning reproduction, contact the Publications Manager on phone 02 6272 3186. Researcher Contact Details Tony Page 500 Yarra Boulevard RICHMOND VIC 3121 Phone: 03 9250 6800 Fax: 03 92506885 Email: [email protected] In submitting this report, the researcher has agreed to RIRDC publishing this material in its edited form. RIRDC Contact Details Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation Level 1, AMA House 42 Macquarie Street BARTON ACT 2600 PO Box 4776 KINGSTON ACT 2604 Phone: 02 6272 4539 Fax: 02 6272 5877 Email: [email protected]. Website: http://www.rirdc.gov.au Published in January 2004 Printed on environmentally friendly paper by Canprint ii Foreword Many Australian native plant foods have the potential to broaden the culinary and nutritional composition of the human diet, both in Australia and worldwide. Kunzea pomifera (muntries) is a species that occurs naturally in south-eastern South Australia and western Victoria and produces an edible berry which was highly valued by Aboriginal peoples and is now being grown in commercial plantations on a modest scale. Current cultivation of muntries is based primarily on selections taken from its natural populations. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the potential for its domestication by examining its plant morphological and molecular variation, its breeding system including its intra- and interspecific cross- compatibility, and the potential for successful vegetative propagation. An idealised commercial plant form, or ideotype, of Kunzea pomifera has been proposed as a result of the present study that would be suited to commercial production. It could be achieved through breeding and selection to exploit the plant to utilize the morphological variation found in its natural populations. This project was funded from RIRDC Core Funds, which are provided by the Australian Government. This report, a new addition to RIRDC’s diverse range of over 1000 research publications, forms part of our New Plant Products R&D program, which aims to facilitate the development of new industries based on plants or plant products that have commercial potential for Australia. Most of our publications are available for viewing, downloading or purchasing online through our website: downloads at www.rirdc.gov.au/fullreports/index.htm purchases at www.rirdc.gov.au/eshop Simon Hearn Managing Director Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation iii Acknowledgements I would like to gratefully acknowledge a number of people and organisations whose assistance and support have contributed substantially to the information content and its compilation in this report. Gerald Halloran, Greg Moore and James Will for academic supervision; Amina Rawal and Cynthia Zuidervaart for technical assistance, Ian Gordon and Peter Ades for statistical support, Alex Campbell for nursery assistance, Ross Payne for engineering and remote sensing technical advice, Ray Rogers, Brian King, Neville Bonney and Australian Native Produce Industries (ANPI) for the donation of selections used in the study, Christian Spencer-White for assistance in construction of greenhouse facilities, Matthew Parker, Paula Geldens, Leigh and Katherine Brown, and particularly Bill Page and Anna Sosnin for personal support. Abbreviations AMOVA analysis of molecular variance ANOVA analysis of variance DNA deoxyribose nucleic acid IBA indole-3-buturic acid Kk Ki Ki Ki Kangaroo Island Lh Lake Hawdon M molar mL millilitre mm millimetre µL microlitre mM minimolar µM micromolar NMDS non-metric multidimensional scaling p p-value pers. comm. personal communication psi pounds per square inch RAPD random amplified polymorphic DNA S.A. South Australia UPGMA unweighted pair group method with arithmetic means w/v weight by volume iv Contents Foreword............................................................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgements............................................................................................................................... iv Abbreviations........................................................................................................................................ iv Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................ vii 1. Sampling field populations of Kunzea pomifera ..........................................................................1 2. Vegetative propagation of Kunzea pomifera ................................................................................4 2.1 Abstract ..................................................................................................................................4 2.2 Introduction ............................................................................................................................4 2.3 Materials and methods............................................................................................................4 2.4 Results ....................................................................................................................................5 2.5 Discussion ..............................................................................................................................6 2.6 Conclusion..............................................................................................................................7 3. Grafting of Kunzea pomifera .........................................................................................................8 3.1 Abstract ..................................................................................................................................8 3.2 Introduction ............................................................................................................................8 3.3 Materials and methods............................................................................................................8 3.4 Results ....................................................................................................................................9 3.5 Discussion ............................................................................................................................10 3.6 Conclusion............................................................................................................................12 4. The influence of topophysis on vegetative propagation in Kunzea pomifera ..........................13 4.1 Abstract ................................................................................................................................13 4.2 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................13 4.3 Materials and methods..........................................................................................................14 4.4 Results ..................................................................................................................................14 4.5 Discussion ............................................................................................................................16 4.6 Conclusion............................................................................................................................17 5. Leaf morphology variation in Kunzea pomifera ........................................................................18 5.1 Abstract ................................................................................................................................18 5.2 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................18 5.3 Materials and methods..........................................................................................................18 5.4 Results ..................................................................................................................................19 5.5 Discussion ............................................................................................................................22 5.6 Conclusion............................................................................................................................26 6. Genetic polymorphism in K.pomifera.........................................................................................27 6.1 Abstract ................................................................................................................................27
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wildflowers to Grow in Your Garden Here Is the Key to the List Large
    Wildflowers to grow in your garden Here is the key to the list Trees Ground covers Shrubs Eucalypts Banksias Myrtle family Banksias Others Baeckea Other Beaufortia Calothamnus Chamelaucium Hypocalymna Kunzea Melaleuca and Callistemon Scholtzia Thryptomene Verticordia Large trees. Think very carefully before you plant them! Large trees, such as lemon scented gums or spotted gums may look great in parks - at least local councils seem to think so (we would rather see local plants). But you may regret planting them in a modern small garden. That doesn't mean there is no room for trees. There are hundreds of attractive small trees that grow very well in native gardens. Here are just a few. Small trees Eucalypts with showy flowers. Eucalytpus caesia Comes in two sub species with the one known as "silver princess" being readily available in Perth. Lovely multi- stemmed weeping tree with pendulous pink flowers and silver-bell fruits. E. torquata Small upright tree with attractive pink flowers. Very drought resistant. E. ficifolia Often called the WA Flowering gum. Ranges in size from small to quite large and in flower colour from deep red to = Corymbia ficifolia orange to pale pink. In WA subject to a serious disease - called canker. Many trees succumb when about 10 or so years old, either dying or becoming very unhealthy. E. preissiana Bell fruited mallee. Small tree (or shrub) with bright yellow flowers. E. erythrocorys Illyarrie, red cap gum or helmet nut gum. Large golden flowers in February preceded by a bright red bud cap. Tree tends to be bit floppy and to need pruning.
    [Show full text]
  • Salinity Tolerance of Muntries (Kunzea Pomifera F. Muell.)
    HORTSCIENCE 53(11):1562–1569. 2018. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI13280-18 When crops are subjected to soil salinity levels exceeding their tolerance levels, plant Kunzea growth declines and crop yields decrease. For Salinity Tolerance of Muntries ( example, strawberry (sensitive) exhibits a re- pomifera duced number of leaves and leaf area at F. Muell.), a Native Food Crop 30 mM NaCl and a 20% reduction in fruit yield (Garriga et al., 2015). A significant in Australia decrease in growth of date palm (tolerant) –1 is observed at 7.3 dS·m , and fruit yield is Chi M. Do, Kate L. Delaporte, Vinay Pagay, and Carolyn J. Schultz1 reduced by 25% (Department of Agricul- School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, Waite Research Institute, The ture and Food, 2016). Olive is an example of University of Adelaide, PMB1, Glen Osmond, SA, 5064, Australia a moderately tolerant fruit crop that shows relatively minor impacts at high salinity (7.5 Additional index words. alternative fruits, homeostasis, potassium, salinity stress, sodium dS·m–1), with 20% to 30% reduction in oil chloride, sustainable agriculture and fresh-fruit yield compared with nonsalt- stressed plants (Al-Rawi and Al-Mohemdy, Abstract . Identifying productive food crops that tolerate moderate soil salinity is critical 2001). In citrus (lime and lemon, both sensi- Kunzea pomifera for global food security. We evaluate the salinity tolerance of tive crops), moderate salinity (50 mM NaCl) (muntries), a traditional Indigenous food plant that grows naturally in coastal regions reduces leaf number, area, and thickness of southern Australia and thrives on relatively low rainfall.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic Variation in Eucalyptus Diversifolia (Myrtaceae) and the Recognition of New Subspecies E
    22 December 1997 Australian Systematic Botany, 10, 651–680 Geographic Variation in Eucalyptus diversifolia (Myrtaceae) and the Recognition of New Subspecies E. diversifolia subsp. hesperia and E. diversifolia subsp. megacarpa Ian J. WrightABC and Pauline Y. LadigesA ASchool of Botany, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3052, Australia. BPresent address: School of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia. CCorresponding author; email: [email protected] Abstract Patterns of geographic variation in morphological and chemical characters are documented in Eucalyptus diversifolia Bonpl. (soap mallee, white coastal mallee). This species is found in coastal and subcoastal Australia from southern Western Australia to Cape Nelson (western Victoria), with a number of disjunctions in the intervening region. Morphological data from adult plants collected at field localities and seedlings grown under uniform conditions were analysed using univariate and multivariate methods, including oneway ANOVA, multiple comparison tests, non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS), nearest neighbour networks, and minimum spanning trees. Seedling material was tested for isozyme polymorphism, and adult leaf flavonoids were analysed using liquid chromatography. Morphological and chemical characters are also documented in E. aff. diversifolia, a closely related but unnamed taxon restricted to ironstone outcrops near Norseman (WA), and putative E. diversifolia– E. baxteri hybrids from Cape Nelson. Congruent patterns in data sets distinguish three groups of E. diversifolia adults and progeny: (1) those to the west of the Nullarbor disjunction; (2) South Australian populations to the east of this disjunction; and (3) those from Cape Nelson. Formal taxonomic recognition of the three forms at subspecific level is established, namely E.
    [Show full text]
  • Puccinia Psidii Winter MAY10 Tasmania (C)
    MAY10Pathogen of the month – May 2010 a b c Fig. 1. Puccinia psidii; (a) Symptoms on Eucalyptus grandis seedling; (b) Stem distortion and multiple branching caused by repeated infections of E. grandis, (c) Syzygium jambos; (d) Psidium guajava; (e) Urediniospores. Photos: A. Alfenas, Federal University of Viçosa, Brazil (a, b,d and e) and M. Glen, University of Tasmania (c). Common Name: Guava rust, Eucalyptus rust d e Winter Disease: Rust in a wide range of Myrtaceous species Classification: K: Fungi, D: Basidiomycota, C: Pucciniomycetes, O: Pucciniales, F: Pucciniaceae Puccinia psidii (Fig. 1) is native to South America and is not present in Australia. It causes rust on a wide range of plant species in the family Myrtaceae. First described on guava, P. psidii became a significant problem in eucalypt plantations in Brazil and also requires control in guava orchards. A new strain of the rust severely affected the allspice industry in Jamaica in the 1930s. P. psidii has spread to Florida, California and Hawaii. In 2007, P. psidii arrived in Japan, on Metrosideros polymorpha cuttings imported from Hawaii. Host Range: epiphytotics on Syzygium jambos in Hawaii, with P. psidii infects young leaves, shoots and fruits of repeated defoliations able to kill 12m tall trees. many species of Myrtaceae. Key Distinguishing Features: Impact: Few rusts are recorded on Myrtaceae. These include In the wild, in its native range, P. psidii has only a P. cygnorum, a telial rust on Kunzea ericifolia, and minor effect. As eucalypt plantations in Brazil are Physopella xanthostemonis on Xanthostemon spp. in largely clonal, impact in areas with a suitable climate Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Muntries the Domestication and Improvement of Kunzea Pomifera (F.Muell.)
    Muntries The domestication and improvement of Kunzea pomifera (F.Muell.) A report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation by Tony Page January 2004 RIRDC Publication No 03/127 RIRDC Project No UM-52A © 2004 Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. All rights reserved. ISBN 0 0642 58693 4 ISSN 1440-6845 Muntries: The domestication and improvement of Kunzea pomifera (F.Muell) Publication No. 03/127 Project No: UM-52A The views expressed and the conclusions reached in this publication are those of the author and not necessarily those of persons consulted. RIRDC shall not be responsible in any way whatsoever to any person who relies in whole or in part on the contents of this report. This publication is copyright. However, RIRDC encourages wide dissemination of its research, providing the Corporation is clearly acknowledged. For any other enquiries concerning reproduction, contact the Publications Manager on phone 02 6272 3186. Researcher Contact Details Tony Page 500 Yarra Boulevard RICHMOND VIC 3121 Phone: 03 9250 6800 Fax: 03 92506885 Email: [email protected] In submitting this report, the researcher has agreed to RIRDC publishing this material in its edited form. RIRDC Contact Details Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation Level 1, AMA House 42 Macquarie Street BARTON ACT 2600 PO Box 4776 KINGSTON ACT 2604 Phone: 02 6272 4539 Fax: 02 6272 5877 Email: [email protected]. Website: http://www.rirdc.gov.au Published in January 2004 Printed on environmentally friendly paper by Canprint ii Foreword Many Australian native plant foods have the potential to broaden the culinary and nutritional composition of the human diet, both in Australia and worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Taxa for the Fitzgerald River National Park
    Flora Survey of the Coastal Catchments and Ranges of the Fitzgerald River National Park 2013 Damien Rathbone Department of Environment and Conservation, South Coast Region, 120 Albany Hwy, Albany, 6330. USE OF THIS REPORT Information used in this report may be copied or reproduced for study, research or educational purposed, subject to inclusion of acknowledgement of the source. DISCLAIMER The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information used. However, the author and participating bodies take no responsibiliy for how this informrion is used subsequently by other and accepts no liability for a third parties use or reliance upon this report. CITATION Rathbone, DA. (2013) Flora Survey of the Coastal Catchments and Ranges of the Fitzgerald River National Park. Unpublished report. Department of Environment and Conservation, Western Australia. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author would like to thank many people that provided valable assistance and input into the project. Sarah Barrett, Anita Barnett, Karen Rusten, Deon Utber, Sarah Comer, Charlotte Mueller, Jason Peters, Roger Cunningham, Chris Rathbone, Carol Ebbett and Janet Newell provided assisstance with fieldwork. Carol Wilkins, Rachel Meissner, Juliet Wege, Barbara Rye, Mike Hislop, Cate Tauss, Rob Davis, Greg Keighery, Nathan McQuoid and Marco Rossetto assissted with plant identification. Coralie Hortin, Karin Baker and many other members of the Albany Wildflower society helped with vouchering of plant specimens. 2 Contents Abstract ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Year 3 Priority Species Scorecard (2018)
    Threatened Species Strategy – Year 3 Priority Species Scorecard (2018) Red-tailed Black-Cockatoo (south-eastern) Calyptorhynchus banksia graptogyne Key Findings South-eastern Red-tailed Black Cockatoos are highly dependent on seeds from just three tree species, as well as deep hollows in very old eucalypt trees for nesting. Habitat loss through tree decline has been caused by drying climatic changes and fire disturbance. Significant recovery efforts have focused on habitat protection and regeneration, however numbers of young birds joining the population are falling for reasons that are unclear. Photo: Bob McPherson Significant trajectory change from 2005-15 to 2015-18? No, ongoing slow decline. Priority future actions • Identify causes of low fecundity in breeding birds and low seed set in monitored trees • All important trees effectively protected against fire, clearing of habitat strictly forbidden • Known nest trees maintained, additional nest boxes erected near high quality feeding trees • A drought strategy developed and implemented Full assessment information Background information 2018 population trajectory assessment 1. Conservation status and taxonomy 8. Expert elicitation for population 2. Conservation history and prospects trends 3. Past and current trends 9. Immediate priorities from 2019 4. Key threats 10. Contributors 5. Past and current management 11. Legislative documents 6. Support from the Australian Government 12. References 7. Measuring progress towards conservation 13. Citation The primary purpose of this scorecard is to assess progress against the year three targets outlined in the Australian Government’s Threatened Species Strategy, including estimating the change in population trajectory of 20 bird species. It has been prepared by experts from the National Environmental Science Program’s Threatened Species Recovery Hub, with input from a number of taxon experts, a range of stakeholders and staff from the Office of the Threatened Species Commissioner, for the information of the Australian Government and is non-statutory.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Diversity and Adaptation in Eucalyptus Pauciflora
    Genetic diversity and adaptation in Eucalyptus pauciflora Archana Gauli (M.Sc.) A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania June, 2014 Declarations This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for a degree or diploma by the University or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis, and to the best of the my knowledge and belief no material previously published or written by another person except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the thesis, nor does the thesis contain any material that infringes copyright. Archana Gauli Date Authority of access This thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying and communication in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Archana Gauli Date Statement regarding published work contained in thesis The publishers of the paper comprising Chapter 2 and Chapter 3 hold the copyright for that content, and access to the material should be sought from the respective journals. The remaining non-published content of the thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying and communication in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Archana Gauli Date i Statement of publication Chapter 2 has been published as: Gauli A, Vaillancourt RE, Steane DA, Bailey TG, Potts BM (2014) The effect of forest fragmentation and altitude on the mating system of Eucalyptus pauciflora (Myrtaceae). Australian Journal of Botany 61, 622-632. Chapter 3 has been accepted for publication as: Gauli A, Steane DA, Vaillancourt RE, Potts BM (in press) Molecular genetic diversity and population structure in Eucalyptus pauciflora subsp.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Plant Identification CONTACT in the Northern and Yorke Region
    Government of South Australia Northern and Yorke Natural FACT SHEET NO 2.018 Resources Management Board September 2011 NRM Plan Native plant identification CONTACT In the Northern and Yorke Region Main Office Basic plant identification is a vital skill for Northern and Yorke NRM Board land managers. It assists in appreciating PO Box 175 the vegetation around you and managing 41-49 Eyre Road that vegetation. Does a plant belong on a Crystal Brook SA 5523 site or is it a weed? Ph: (08) 8636 2361 Fx: (08) 8636 2371 This fact sheet introduces some of the www.nynrm.sa.gov.au common plant groups of the Northern and Yorke Region and how to identify them. All living things have been categorized into what is known as the Linnaean System of classification. Plants are grouped using common attributes until each plant is given a unique Classification. The steps of Classification are: • Kingdom • Division • Class • Order • Family • Subfamily • Genus • Species This results in a unique Botanical or Scientific name consisting of Genus and Species. Some plants are further split into sub species. Most plants have at least one common name. These are non scientific and often vary from region to region. Some plants may have the same common name, this often causes confusion so it is important to use the Botanical name. The plants right would be referred to as Eucalyptus leucoxylon subspecies leucoxylon or the South Australian Blue Gum. This plant is known as Yellow Gum in Victoria. Glossary of common botanical terms Annual A plant that completes its life within one year.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 112 SEPTEMBER 2002 Price: $5.00
    No. 112 SEPTEMBER 2002 Price: $5.00 AUSTRALIAN SYSTEMATIC BOTANY SOCIETY INCORPORATED Office Bearers President Vice President Stephen Hopper John Clarkson Kings Park & Botanic Garden Centre for Tropical Agriculture West Perth PO Box 1054 WA 6005 Mareeba QLD tel: (08) 9480 3605 tel: (07) 4048 4745 email: [email protected] email: [email protected] Secretary Treasurer Brendan Lepschi Anthony Whalen Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research Australian National Herbarium Australian National Herbarium GPO Box 1600, Canberra GPO Box 1600, Canberra ACT 2601 ACT 2601 tel: (02) 6246 5167 tel: (02) 6246 5175 email: [email protected] email: [email protected] Councillor Councillor R.O.(Bob) Makinson Andrew Rozefelds Royal Botanic Gardens Sydney Tasmanian Herbarium Mrs Macquaries Road GPO Box 252-40 Sydney NSW 2000 Hobart, Tasmania 7001 tel: (02) 9231 8111 tel.: (03) 6226 2635 email: [email protected] email: [email protected] Public Officer Annette Wilson Australian Biological Resources Study Environment Australia GPO Box 787 CANBERRA ACT 2601 tel: (02) 6250 9417 email: [email protected] Affiliate Society Papua New Guinea Botanical Society ASBS Web site www.anbg.gov.au/asbs Webmaster: Murray Fagg Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research Australian National Herbarium Email: [email protected] Loose-leaf inclusions with this issue · CSIRO Publishing advertising catalogue · Notice re September 2003 Plant Systematics in Australia conference in Melbourne Publication dates of previous issue Austral.Syst.Bot.Soc.Nsltr 111 (June 2002 issue) Hardcopy: 12th July 2002; ASBS Web site: 12th July 2002 Australian Systematic Botany Society Newsletter 112 (September 2002) ASBS Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Eucalyptus Risdonii
    Eucalyptus risdonii FAMILY: MYRTACEAE BOTANICAL NAME: Eucalyptus risdonii, Hook.f., London J. Bot. 6: 477 bis (1847) COMMON NAME: Risdon peppermint COMMONWEALTH STATUS: (EPBC Act) Not Listed TASMANIAN STATUS: (TSP Act) rare Eucalyptus risdonii. B. Craven. Description This tree is distinctly bluish-green (glaucous) in colour and often grows to between 3- 8 metres. The trunk is smooth, though circular leaf scars often remain until the first layer of bark is totally shed. After this stage, the trunk is ash-grey and streaked with cream. Leaves: The juvenile and adult leaves are similar in form and arranged oppositely along the stem. They are stalkless with the basal parts wrapped around the stem. The leaves are very glaucous, lance-shaped in outline and have a pointed tip. The pair of adult leaves measure between 6-10 cm long. Floral arrangement: The flowering parts (umbels) have between 5-15 flowers and are located in the axils (where the stem meets the leaf) of the leaves. The flower stalks are circular and between 7-12 mm long. The buds are stalked, club-shaped, glaucous and between 5-8 mm long. Fruit: The capsule is pear-shaped and between 8-10 mm in diameter. The openings on the upper surface of the capsule are level or enclosed. Distinguishing characteristics: This species is the only known example in the subgenus Monocalyptus that retains the juvenile foliage form on reproductive branches (description from Curtis 1975). Confusing species: Eucalyptus risdonii intergrades with Eucalyptus tenuiramis but can be distinguished from this species by the higher proportion of individuals with fruit at nodes with juvenile foliage.
    [Show full text]
  • Labiatae) in South-Eastern Australia
    319 Contributions to the systematics of Prostanthera (Labiatae) in south-eastern Australia Barry J. Conn Abstract Conn, B.J. (Royal Botanic Gardens, Mrs Macquaries Road, Sydney NSW 2000, Australia) 1997. Contributions to the systematics of Prostanthera (Labiatae) in south-eastern Australia. Telopea 7(4): 319–332. Prostanthera cuneata is regarded as endemic to mainland Australia, with the type material based on cultivated material grown in Formosa garden, Tasmania. The new species Prostanthera galbraithiae B.J.Conn is here formally described. A morphological re-evaluation of Prostanthera melissifolia concludes that this species is endemic to Victoria. Prostanthera melissifolia sensu Conn, from the Northern Tablelands of New South Wales, is P. caerulea R.Br., and Prostanthera sp. aff. melissifolia sensu Beauglehole, from East Gippsland (Victoria), probably is P. incisa R.Br. (s. lat.). A full description, habitat notes, distribution map and illustration of each of the first three species are provided. Introduction This paper presents the conclusions of revisionary studies into the genus Prostanthera section Prostanthera, arising particularly from work towards the preparation of an account of the genus for the forthcoming Flora of Victoria, volume 4. Terminology follows Conn (1984), except inflorescence terminology as modified by Conn (1995). Distribution information for Victoria follows Conn (1993). 1. Distribution of Prostanthera cuneata Benth. Previously, Prostanthera cuneata has been regarded as occurring in New South Wales, Tasmania and Victoria. Although the type specimen of this species (Gunn 725, 7 Dec. 1842) is stated to have been collected from the ‘South Esk’ River, south of Launceston in Tasmania, Buchanan (1988, 1990) states that Gunn actually collected from ‘Formosa’ garden, on the estate of W.E.
    [Show full text]