Passenger Rail Station Location Study Final Report May 2016

Orlando

Brevard

West Palm Beach

Fort Lauderdale Miami

Passenger Rail Station Location Study Final Report Prepared for:

Space Coast Transportation Planning Organization 2725 Judge Fran Jamieson Way, Building B, Room 105 Melbourne, FL 32940

Prepared by:

Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 225 E. Robinson Street, Suite 450 Orlando, FL 32801

Funding Provided by:

Canaveral Port Authority 445 Challenger Road, Suite 301 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920

May 2016

Passenger Rail Station Location Study

Table of Contents

Summary ...... 2

All Aboard Florida’s Brightline Passenger Rail Service ...... 2

AAF/Brightline Infrastructure and Fixed Assets ...... 3

Brightline Operating Characteristics ...... 6

Opportunities for Brevard County ...... 8

Preferred Station Location Selection Process ...... 9

Station Location Criteria ...... 10

Station Location Evaluation Checklist ...... 10

Candidate Station Locations ...... 12

Station Location Evaluation ...... 14

All Aboard Florida Staff Review ...... 16

Brevard County’s Transit Vision ...... 18

Commuter Rail Characteristics ...... 21

Recommendations ...... 22

Appendices

Appendix A: SCTPO Adopted Resolution 16‐14 ...... A‐1

Appendix B: Station Evaluation Form ...... B‐1

Appendix C: Submitted Station Location Checklists ...... C‐1

1 | Page

Passenger Rail Station Location Study Summary

All Aboard Florida is developing an express train service, called Brightline, that will provide direct intercity travel beginning in 2017 between Miami and Orlando International Airport, one of the most populous and visited regions in the United States. The train will run through part of Brevard County using the existing Florida East Coast (FEC) Railway corridor between Miami and Cocoa, and connect on new track along State Road 528 between Cocoa and Orlando. Current plans do not include a station in Brevard County.

The Space Coast Transportation Planning Organization (SCTPO) identified this as an opportunity to advance the County’s public transportation vision, as described in the TPO’s 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) and 2016 Strategic Plan, and support the region’s economy and tourism industries. TPO staff encouraged All Aboard Florida (AAF) to add a Brightline station in Brevard County, which AAF declined to do at least during the initial phase of Brightline development. In December, 2014 the SCTPO and the Canaveral Port Authority agreed to undertake a study to identify a potential station location that would be supported by the various stakeholders in Brevard County. The location(s) would be submitted to AAF for consideration.

The TPO worked with local municipalities in Brevard County to identify candidate locations and evaluate their viability as a station for express passenger rail service. The TPO developed a station evaluation form to help cities identify and assess potential locations and collect the information needed to evaluate their feasibility. Local municipalities submitted nine candidate locations in total, which were analyzed and ranked by the TPO using a set of evaluation criteria based on the viability of the station to support AAF’s ridership and development goals.

Based on the analysis and review by AAF staff, the SCTPO endorsed station locations in the vicinity of SR 528, US 1 and Clearlake Road and at the former Cocoa Passenger Station on US 1 and Rosa Jones Blvd. AAF committed to assess the ridership, development potential and operational features of the sites to determine the feasibility of the locations as a passenger rail station. All Aboard Florida's Brightline Passenger Rail Service

In March, 2012, All Aboard Florida announced a plan to develop a privately funded passenger rail system between Orlando International Airport and Miami, with additional stations in Ft. Lauderdale and West Palm Beach. Figure 1 shows the route of the $3.5 billion service proposed to begin in 2017. AAF Figure 1: Brightline route between Miami and officials noted efutur extensions to Jacksonville and Orlando International Airport Tampa will be considered.

2 | Page

Passenger Rail Station Location Study

Brightline is noteworthy for two reasons. First, privately funded, for‐profit passenger rail has not operated in the United States for the last 45 years. FEC halted passenger service in 1968. Second, Brightline will operate at speeds up to 125 mph. Only the Amtrak Acela service in the northeast corridor now reaches such speeds.

In August, 2015, the Federal Railroad Administration issued a "Finding of No Significant Impact" for new track and bridges and train operation between West Palm Beach and Orlando, which includes that part of the operation in Brevard County.

AAF/Brightline Infrastructure and Fixed Assets

All Aboard Florida (AAF) and the Florida East Coast Railway (FEC) are subsidiaries of Florida East Coast Industries (FEC‐I). FEC will continue to operate freight rail service. AAF will operate the passenger rail service called Brightline on a new, second track within the FEC rail corridor between Miami and Cocoa. AAF will install new track along the south side of SR 528 between Cocoa and Orlando International Airport.

Figure 2: All Aboard Florida route through Brevard County

3 | Page

Passenger Rail Station Location Study

The route through Brevard County (Figure 2) involves the existing FEC corridor parallel to US 1 as far as the Cocoa Yard at US 1 and SR 528. Figure 3 shows the path the new AAF track will take in north Cocoa. The new track will pass under SR 528 and over Industry Road.

528

Figure 3: Brightline route (red) through north Cocoa near SR 528 and US 1

Brightline train sets will be about 900 feet long and consist of two locomotives and seven passenger cars. The trains will feature best‐in‐class innovation and technology such as low‐emission locomotives and custom‐designed coaches optimized for passenger comfort. The locomotives will be among the first in the country to feature Positive Train Control which enhances safety by monitoring and controlling train speed, separation, grade crossing status and location. Cars will feature Wi‐Fi, meeting space in business class and full ADA compatibility. Siemens, a world leader in passenger train production, is manufacturing the train sets in Sacramento, Calif. The locomotives and coaches are 100% American made.

4 | Page

Passenger Rail Station Location Study

Stations are planned for downtown Miami, Fort Lauderdale, and West Palm Beach with the northern terminus at the Orlando International Airport South Intermodal Terminal Facility. AAF will lease terminal and ticketing space from the Greater Orlando Aviation Authority. The Miami Station will cover 35 acres in central Miami and include office, retail and residential uses.

The Fort Lauderdale and West Palm Beach stations (Figures 4 and 5) are of identical design and size with a station building (30,000 sf), retail space (10,000 sf) and parking for 60 cars. The stations feature transit/intermodal connectivity and proximity to attractions, public buildings and support functions such as hotels. The station occupies about 4 acres. The boarding platform is on the west side of the tracks. For safety, considerable attention is paid to separating passenger and freight train activities. All stations feature distinctive V‐shaped exterior columns and bright, open interiors.

Figure 4: Rendering of West Palm Beach Brightline Station Phases 1 and 2

Figure 5: Rendering of West Palm Beach Brightline Station Phases 1 and 2

5 | Page

Passenger Rail Station Location Study

Figure 6: Rendering of West Palm Beach Brightline Station Phases 1 and 2

Figure 7: Site Plan Concept of West Palm Beach Brightline Station

Brightline Operating Characteristics

AAF is developing the Brightline service to travel between Orlando and Miami in about three hours. Driving the same distance requires about four hours; flying about three. AAF contends that travel time can be more productive and relaxing by rail than by other modes. In general, autos are most effective for travel less than 200 miles; flying is most effective for trips over 500 miles. Passenger

6 | Page

Passenger Rail Station Location Study

rail is best for trips between 200 and 500 miles. The Orlando to Miami via the east coast is within the preferred rail trip range. Approximately 500 million trips are made between Central and South Florida annually. The Brightline service, both infrastructure, rolling stock and operating characteristics, are designed to attract as many of these trips as possible.

Brightline will operate 32 trains, 16 in each direction. Service will start at 6 AM and end at 9 PM with hourly northbound and southbound headways. A station stop will last about five minutes (dwell time). Trains will travel:  Up to 79h mp between Miami and West Palm Beach  Up to 110 mph between West Palm Beach and Cocoa  Up to 125 mph between Cocoa and Orlando Maximum Allowable Speed is based on several factors such as curvature, signaling, track condition and the number of grade crossings.

Brightline passenger trains will be faster and lighter than the freight trains that currently operate in the existing rail corridor. Compared to freight trains, passenger trains will clear intersections in less than a minute and produce less noise and vibration.

Brightline service is designed for various trip purposes. A profile of the anticipated market characteristics for Brightline travelers is provided in Figure 8. 75 percent of travelers are expected to be families and leisure, with 25 percent traveling for business. Fares are intended to be competitive with other travel options. Ticketing will be offered on‐line and follow the dynamic pricing model developed for airline travel.

Figure 8: Market assessment for Brightline service

7 | Page

Passenger Rail Station Location Study

Opportunities for Brevard County

This section highlights the benefits of locating a Brightline passenger rail station in Brevard County. All Aboard Florida’s planned route runs through Brevard County. However, AAF currently has no plans for a station between Orlando and West Palm Beach, let alone Brevard County. Without a station, the benefits of AAF to Brevard County will be minimal. All Aboard Florida is a for‐profit venture. The justification for a station must be fundamentally economic. That is, a station in Brevard must generate sufficient revenue in the profit centers of AAF's business model ‐‐ passenger fares and ancillary development ‐‐ to exceed expenses. The following highlights aspects of Brevard County that can bring additional business to AAF and, vice versa, station benefits for Brevard residents and businesses. (Some estimation or subjectivity will be needed until an investment grade passenger revenue study is conducted, which AAF has pledged to do.)

About 105 million persons visit Florida annually. Of that total, about 65 million visit Orlando making it the most visited city in the world. In addition to Orlando, visitors (especially repeat visitors) often explore attractions beyond the theme parks for which Orlando is internationally known.

A ridership survey conducted by AAF showed that availability of inter‐regional passenger rail service induces greater visitor travel. 80 percent of respondents agreed they would visit more cities on their trip than they'd originally planned. Access to multiple locations along the rail line means travelers can disburse to other areas where they may not have been able to go during their trip.

Brevard has three attractions that annually draw 2 million or more national and international visitors: 1. Kennedy Space Center Visitor Center is internationally recognized and one of the most visited attractions in Florida. 2. Atlantic Ocean beaches stretch for 75 miles. Brevard’s beaches are closest to the Orlando attractions. 3. Port Canaveral is the second busiest cruise port in the world. The Canaveral Port Authority funded this study to look at how an AAF station could benefit the Port and vice versa. Rapidly growing is eco‐tourism, based around the Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge, Canaveral National Seashore, the St Johns, nIndia and Banana Rivers and the Atlantic Ocean.

8 | Page

Passenger Rail Station Location Study

Currently visitors often stay in Orlando area hotels and take day trips usually via auto to these attractions. The appeal of the Brevard attractions could induce many passengers to use rail rather than auto. Furthermore, visitors staying in south Florida could travel to and from the Kennedy Space Center or a cruise from Port Canaveral via train rather than driving. Access to Brevard attractions can increase the number of passengers using Brightline.

Approximately 500 million passenger trips take place annually between Orlando and south Florida. AAF is seeking to capture but a fraction of those trips. It should also be noted that significant travel occurs between Brevard and Volusia Counties and south Florida. A portion of these auto trips can be captured by passenger rail. Business trips between Brevard's many high tech companies and suppliers or customers in south Florida is another opportunity for passenger fare revenue.

A Brevard Brightline station will be designed for ancillary TOD (transit oriented development) as is the case for all of AAF stations. The non‐rail activities at the station could be operated on a franchise basis, not necessarily by AAF‐related firms as in Miami, Ft. Lauderdale and West Palm Beach. For planning purposes, wee ar assuming a station design and size (40,000 sq. ft.) comparable to the stations in West Palm Beach and Ft. Lauderdale.

AAF has publicly discussed the future opportunity of extending Brightline service to Jacksonville. FEC‐I owns the tracks and right of way, so the cost would be relatively less than a completely new rail alignment. The future north‐south passenger rail line between Jacksonville and Miami will intersect the east‐west track to Orlando (and maybe Tampa) in north Cocoa. A transfer station/regional passenger rail hub would be naturally located at the north‐south, east‐west junction. This hub would be accessible by rail from all major population centers of the state and could develop into a significant conference, convention, office, hotel complex. The hub will be located in proximity to what is becoming the international center for commercial space activity.

Brevard will benefit by increased economic activity both at a station and associated with the transportation services needed to move patrons from the station to destinations. More tourists with an easy means to visit should translate into higher visitor numbers and perhaps more hotel nights. An alternative travel method to Miami and Orlando International Airport will improve convenience for Brevard residents. Finally, a Brightline station will further augment Brevard’s already rich supply of internationally recognized transportation resources. Preferred Station Location Selection Process

The TPO developed a process to identify potential stations and select a preferred location for recommendation to AAF:

1. Develop station evaluation criteria 2. Solicit candidate station locations from municipalities 9 | Page

Passenger Rail Station Location Study

3. Request criteria data from municipalities 4. Weight criteria and score locations 5. Review evaluation results with municipalities 6. Review evaluation results with AAF staff 7. Submit recommendations to Space Coast TPO and Canaveral Port Authority

Following this process, the TPO received nine candidate locations which were ranked in order of how each performed based on the evaluation criteria. The following sections provide additional detail about the station location evaluation and selection process.

Station Location Criteria SCTPO and Port Canaveral began in 2014 to consider opportunities to add a station along the AAF alignment within Brevard County. Recognizing that AAF is a private entity, a potential station’s viability depends on its ability to generate revenue for AAF, both through additional ridership and development within and near the station location.

 Development Potential – transportation investments like intercity rail service spur economic development nearby, especially immediately adjacent to the station. For AAF, higher potential for more intense development and redevelopment would translate to potential economic returns for the AAF investment. This set of criteria evaluates specific land use and transportation characteristics adjacent to the stations that can create optimum conditions for high intensity development and result in maximum economic return for AAF’s investment.  Potential Ridership – passenger demand for interregional rail depends on the number of potential transit riders’ ability to access transit stations with ease and comfort. The closer a station is to key origins and destinations, the more likely it is to attract them as customers. For interregional passenger rail, close proximity to highways and ports increases the accessibility and attractiveness of a Brevard County AAF station.  Operational Compatibility ‐‐ the station location must not interfere with the safety or operation of passenger or freight trains. The station platform will be on the west side of the right of way. The platform must extend along the entire length of the stopped train and cannot block streets.

Station Location Evaluation Checklist The first step in the process was to identify the information needed to evaluate potential stations. The TPO set out a series of evaluation criteria against which stations would be considered, ranging from engineering requirements and logistics to land use compatibility. Criteria were divided into two categories:

10 | Page

Passenger Rail Station Location Study

TIER 1, which are mandatory requirements any station location must exhibit; and TIER 2, which are scoring variables that determine each station’s potential for generating ridership and revenue.

The Tier 1 criteria for candidate station parcels are: 1. Adjacent to Florida East Coast (FEC) Railway – for the station location to serve the train it must be physically adjacent to the tracks. 2. Passenger Loading Platform on West Side of Tracks – Brightline anticipates using the westernmost rail line, so the loading platform will need to access trains from the west. 3. Straight Railway Section – a minimum 1,000 feet of tangent (straight line) railway track is required for all the train cars to stop and allow passengers to board and alight. 4. Minimum 3 Acres in Size – station development sites must be at least 3 acres in size to accommodate station activities, parking, circulation, and associated development. 5. Developable Land – the land must be largely free of wetland or floodplain impacts. 6. Utilities Available – the site must have access to electricity, water, sewer, and telecommunications (including fiber optics). 7. Planning Compatibility – existing land use and zoning regulations must allow high‐density development and building heights greater than three stories. The site area must also be compatible with potential noise and lighting impacts of early morning and evening station activity and station lighting.

Candidate station sites that met all of the Tier I criteria were advanced for consideration as a potential station location and were then evaluated against the Tier 2 Evaluation Criteria.

Tier 2 criteria were organized into the primary functions of a Brightline station in Brevard County: 1. Is the parcel developable? Who owns the parcel, how large is it, and what is the developable area? 2. What is the development potential? Is the station location site adjacent to developable parcels? Are there developable parcels nearby? 3. How visible is the site? How many vehicles drive pass the location? How long is the street frontage? 4. Are development incentives available? Do municipalities provide incentives for development? 5. How would passengers access the station site? Does the parcel frontage allow for multiple full access points? What is the available roadway capacity on the primary arterial serving the parcel? 6. How well does the location serve Port Centers? What is the distance to Port Canaveral? What is the distance to Melbourne International Airport?

11 | Page

Passenger Rail Station Location Study

7. How well does the location serve cultural destinations? What is the distance to the Kennedy Space Center? How many tourist sites, historic districts, and arts districts are within one mile of the site? 8. How well connected is the site to regional highways? What is the distance to the nearest I‐ 95 or SR 528 interchange?

Candidate Station Locations Local municipalities in Brevard County nominated nine station location sites. For each location, the governing municipality completed the Evaluation Form with the requested information, which was then evaluated by the TPO. Four municipalities nominated locations: Palm Bay, Melbourne, Rockledge, and Cocoa. The nine sites are listed below and illustrated in Figure 9.

1. Palm Bay (Robert J Conlon Boulevard NE) 2. Melbourne 1 (Main Street) 3. Melbourne 2 (Waverly Place) 4. Melbourne 3 (Apollo Boulevard) 5. Rockledge/Cocoa (Rosa L Jones Boulevard) 6. Cocoa 1 (Plaza Parkway) 7. Cocoa 2 (Michigan Avenue) 8. Cocoa 3 (Clearlake Road) 9. Cocoa 4 (Beau Geste Road)

The full submittal package for each station is provided in Appendix C – Submitted Station Location Checklists.

12 | Page

Passenger Rail Station Location Study

Figure 9: Brightline Candidate Station Locations, Brevard County, Florida

13 | Page

Passenger Rail Station Location Study

Station Location Evaluation To evaluate the station locations, each criterion was weighted and scored. The categories were normalized to provide an even comparison and then weighted according to station location priorities determined through conversations with AAF. Each criterion was scaled to a 0 to 10 scale to provide a comparison across categories. The weights and scoring factors are provided in Table 1.

Each of the nine candidate locations were evaluated against the criteria and scored. Once the evaluations were complete, the TPO facilitated a meeting with representatives from each municipality to explain the process and share the results of the eanalysis. Th results of the analysis are presented in Table 2.

Tier 2 Evaluation Criterion Maximum Value Normalized By Weight

Developable parcel size 10 acres Total acres / max size 20%

Acres of vacant parcels immediately adjacent to 30 acres Total acres / max size 20% site

Acres of vacant parcels within ¼-mile 120 acres Total acres / max size 15%

Distance to I-95 or SR 528 interchange 6.4 miles (Max distance – distance) / max distance 10%

Distance to Port Canaveral 30 miles (Max distance – distance) / max distance 10%

Distance to Melbourne International Airport 27 miles (Max distance – distance) / max distance 10%

Distance to Kennedy Space Center Visitor 45 miles (Max distance – distance) / max distance 5% Center

Daily traffic volume 52,630 vehicles/ day Daily traffic volume / max volume 5%

Linear feet of street frontage 2,500 feet Linear feet of frontage / max frontage 3%

Number of tourist sites within 1 mile 8 sites Tourist sites / max tourists sites 2%

Table 1: Station Location Criteria Calculations and Weights

14 | Page

Passenger Rail Station Location Study

Robert Beau Conlon Main Waverly Apollo Rosa Jones Plaza Michigan Clearlake Geste Blvd Street Place Blvd Blvd Pkwy Ave Rd Rd Tier 2 Evaluation Palm Rockledge/ Criterion Bay Melbourne Melbourne Melbourne Cocoa Cocoa Cocoa Cocoa Cocoa Developable 5 5 5 5 7 6 7 7 7 Parcel Size Vacant 7.0 2.3 8.7 0.0 6.4 3.3 8.3 10.0 3.3 Parcels (immediate) Vacant 10.0 4.1 4.3 2.8 1.0 1.9 1.7 2.5 1.7 Parcels (¼ -mile) Distance to 1.7 0.0 0.3 1.4 3.8 5.3 8.6 8.6 9.7 I-95/SR 528 Distance to 0.6 1.2 0.0 1.5 6.0 6.3 6.6 7.0 6.6 Canaveral Distance to Melbourne 7.6 8.9 9.2 9.6 2.6 1.5 1.1 0.7 0.0 Airport Distance to 0.0 0.4 1.8 0.9 5.9 6.3 6.5 6.4 6.4 KSC Traffic 7.8 9.3 7.8 10.0 6.3 5.6 5.6 2.9 5.2 volume

Frontage 6.7 6.0 2.3 5.8 1.9 7.2 3.2 1.4 10.0

Tourist Sites 0.0 2.5 10.0 1.3 6.3 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 Weighted Total 5.09 3.46 4.77 3.29 5.45 4.45 6.25 6.51 5.43

Table 2: Station Location Evaluation Results

15 | Page

Passenger Rail Station Location Study

Figure 10: The Clearlake Road station location in Cocoa, outlined in red, scored the highest against the evaluation criteria due to its strategic location and potential development opportunity.

Overall, the sites in Cocoa scored well, with the Clearlake Road location receiving the highest score. The Clearlake Road station location includes several important features:

 Good access to regional highways  Abundant developable land area  Considerable land already owned by All Aboard Florida  Relatively close to Port Canaveral  Located at future passenger rail junction, well suited for future expansion to Jacksonville

An aerial photo of the potential station site is provided in Figure 10.

All Aboard Florida Staff Review Upon completion of the draft location evaluations, TPO presented the study methodology and findings to senior All Aboard Florida staff. AAF had not participated in the study in any manner. While aware that it was underway, AAF provided no direction, information or preferences during the study development. Therefore, TPO staff believed it prudent to advise AAF of the findings and

16 | Page

Passenger Rail Station Location Study

hear any feedback before presenting the conclusions in public to the Space Coast TPO and Canaveral Port Authority.

AAF staff, overall, agreed with the study approach, evaluation factors, weighting and conclusions. It was noted the highest scoring site on Clearlake Road in north Cocoa was rather isolated from other related support facilities such as hotels, restaurants and attractions within walking distance, but the site did offer the best access to Port Canaveral and the Kennedy Space Center and had good, although somewhat indirect, road access to SR 528 and I‐95.

AAF staff expressed interest in the former FEC Railway passenger station site at US 1 and Rosa Jones Blvd. that straddles the Cocoa/Rockledge city limits, one of the nine candidate locations submitted. The station illustration (Figure 11) was prepared several years ago to show what an Amtrak station at that site could look like. AAF staff cited the central city location similar to other Brightline station sites that can provide attractions within walking distance of the station. The land is owned and now being used by FEC Railway, which would have to be resolved. The station and most of the developable land is on the east side of the tracksd an Rosa Jones Blvd is close to the station building all of which could present operational issues. However, AAF officials requested the TPO staff present the Cocoa/Rockledge site to the TPO and Canaveral Port Authority for favorable consideration.

Figure 11: Rendering of Possible Cocoa AMTRAK Station (2011)

17 | Page

Passenger Rail Station Location Study

Brevard County’s Transit Vision

As the County looks into the future, this study also serves as a framework for introducing potential future passenger rail transit in Brevard County.

The SCTPO 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan outlines a vision for premium transit in Brevard County. The Plan identifies commuter rail as one of the premium transit services appropriate for the County and outlines a vision for supporting transit service and directing future growth strategically around this investment.

The vision for transit identified strategic corridors for commuter rail along US 1 and SR 528, as illustrated in Figure 13. Premium transit service along the US 1 corridor expands travel mode choices between Downtown Melbourne and Downtown Cocoa. The US 1 corridor, including both the highway and FEC rail line, is the backbone for the region’s transit system plan. The plan identifies several key opportunities along this corridor:

 Regional commuter rail stops could be located at the County’s original rail stations in Titusville, Cocoa, Eau Gallie, Melbourne, and Palm Bay.  Stations at Melbourne International Airport and the Space Coast Regional Airport in Titusville.  Connectivity with the potential AAF hub in Cocoa with Port Canaveral and the Orlando International Airport.  Rights of way along nearly the eentir length of the alignment can accommodate three tracks in the future.

The Plan also outlines a coordinated land use strategy to leverage a regional premium transit investment. It emphasizes mixed‐use, higher density, and clustered developments in downtown areas and near future transit centers. Transit oriented development (TOD) is fundamental to the success of the multimodal and premium transit strategies. A few places in Brevard already have the form and structure necessary to support premium transit, including downtown Titusville, Cocoa, and Melbourne. For station areas identified outside these centers, the Plan recommends that development intensities and patterns must fundamentally change to be supportive of premium transit.

18 | Page

Passenger Rail Station Location Study

Figure 13: The vision for premium transit in Brevard County features strategic corridors

19 | Page

Passenger Rail Station Location Study

The Plan organized existing development and future growth within the framework of major transportation corridors and mobility hubs. The mobility hubs include:

 Intermodal hubs – includes urban core, traditional neighborhood, and multifamily development types in and around the county’s space, air, and sea ports as well as existing and planned rail and truck terminals.  Regional multimodal hubs – includes urban core and multifamily development in the historical towns along the FEC railroad and well as new larger hubs where walking takes priority and multiple travel modes converge.  Multimodal hubs – includes mobility hub, traditional neighborhood and multifamily development types in walkable transit station areas along multimodal corridors with the intensity and mix of land uses that support premium transit.

These hubs represent the focus areas for land use development and will require enhanced transit service to accommodate the growth. The hubs are identified in Figure 14.

Figure 14: The vision for premium transit in Brevard County features mobility hubs

20 | Page

Passenger Rail Station Location Study

Likewise, the SCTPO Strategic Plan Priorities 2016 emphasizes the importance of regional transit. Priority B1: Enhance connectivity for people, goods, and economic vitality calls on the TPO to support rail transit and complete a passenger rail location study. Figure 15 shows the implementation priorities for 2016.

Figure 15: Passenger rail service is among the SCTPO’s priorities for 2016.

Both the 2040 Plan and 2016 Priorities establish a framework for passenger rail service in Brevard County. These planning studies inform decision‐making and prioritization for potential high speed rail service in the County.

Commuter Rail Characteristics Commuter rail service is characterized by medium‐haul distances (15 to 50 miles) connecting suburban communities and employment centers with downtown areas. Service focuses on commuters, with the highest frequencies during peak commuting hours. Stations are placed one to five miles apart, with trains ranging from five to nine cars per train. It is quite different from the inter‐regional express service proposed by All Aboard Florida.

Commuter rail stations in suburban areas are primarily accessed by park‐and‐ride. As stations move into areas of greater density, greater numbers of riders arrive at the station by bus, walking, or bicycling. Stations in urban areas may provide no parking and rely entirely on walk, bike, bus, or taxis/drop‐off service (kiss and ride) for connections to the station.

21 | Page

Passenger Rail Station Location Study

The vision for passenger rail transportation in Brevard County relies on commuter rail. Commuter rail stations will have different requirements from high speed rail service, which are oriented towards longer inter‐regional trips and not typically serving commute trips. Commuter rail projects are likely to be funded with public money (Federal, state, or local). Station location criteria for commuter rail are likely to significantly consider economic development returns of the transit investment, cost vs. benefits for each transit rider, and environmental benefits and impacts.

Brevard is part of the emerging Florida Megaregion and now among the ten most populous urbanized regions in the country. Passenger rail, both inter‐regional high speed service and more localized commuter rail, will likely play a significant role in the region's transportation future by providing relief to increasingly congested roadways. Recommendations

The station location study findings were presented to the Space Coast TPO Board on March 10, 2016 and to the Canaveral Port Authority Commission on March 23, 2016. The recommendations are contained in SCTPO Resolution 16‐14 (Appendix A).

The SCTPO recommends locations along SR 528 near SR 524 and US 1 (Cocoa #3 and #4) as a preferred site of a future inter‐regional express rail station location in Brevard County. These locations offer great potential to generate ridership and ancillary development opportunities for AAF. Its location at the intersection of US 1 and SR 528 provides ideal access to Port Canaveral and the Port Canaveral Cruise Terminals, while positioning to serve the future Brightline expansion to Jacksonville.

The SCTPO also recommends the former Cocoa passenger rail station site for redevelopment into a Brightline station. That location offers proximity to an urban destination (Cocoa Village), developable land and good access to Port Canaveral and the regional roadway network.

The SCTPO recognizes the information compiled on all submitted sites establishes a baseline for future regional passenger rail planning. Station location sites evaluated through this process will be retained for future consideration as commuter rail stations and to catalyze the growth of the County’s mobility hubs. The results of these efforts will help improve multimodal connectivity and mobility in the County to help support its economy and future growth.

22 | Page

Appendix A SCTPO Adopted Resolution 16‐24

Appendix B Passenger Rail Station Candidate Location Evaluation Form

Space Coast Transportation Planning Organization

Passenger Rail Station Candidate Location Evaluation

An intercity passenger rail station in Brevard County needs to meet the multiple objectives of attracting passengers and supporting ancillary development and investment. To serve these demands, the station must meet a set of feasibility criteria. All Aboard Florida (AAF) is under no obligation to include a station in Brevard County and will only do so if it makes good business sense for AAF.

This document outlines the criteria the Space Coat TPO will use to identify and prioritize candidate station locations. The criteria are divided into two tiers: Tier 1 criteria are required; and Tier 2 criteria will be used to evaluate and rank eligible locations. The following outlines the factors against which potential station locations will be assessed.

Tier 1: Parcel Requirements

1. Adjacent to FEC Railway – parcels must be adjacent to the AAF portion of the FEC Railway. AAF passenger trains will run on the west side of the tracks 2. Railway Tangent – stations must be adjacent to a tangent (straight line) section of track that is at least 1,000 feet long and contains no grade crossings or crossing that cannot be closed 3. Minimum Size – station sites must be at least 3 acres in size 4. Developable Land – station sites must not be in wetlands or floodplains 5. Utilities Available – access to electricity, water, sewer, and telecommunications (including fiber) 6. Planning Compatibility – zoning supports high density development and building heights greater than 3 stories. Station site area compatible with early morning and evening activity and parking lot lighting

Tier 2: Evaluation Criteria

Based on these factors, the Space Coast TPO will assess potential sites that meet the minimum requirements according to a set of criteria. These evaluation criteria will help determine which locations have the most potential and warrant further analysis. The evaluation is organized into the two primary purposes of an AAF station in Brevard County:

x Redevelopment Potential – transportation investments like intercity rail spur economic development nearby, especially immediately adjacent to the station. For AAF, high potential for higher intensity redevelopment would translate to potential returns for the AAF investment. Land use and transportation characteristics adjacent to the stations can create conditions better suited to realizing the full economic potential. x Potential Ridership – passenger demand for intercity rail depends on its proximity to high concentrations of people and jobs and the ability to access destinations near the stations. The closer a station is to where people live and work, the more likely it is to attract them as customers. Likewise, close proximity to highways and ports increases the accessibility and attractiveness of a Brevard County AAF station.

AllAboardFloridaProposedAlignment

Station Location Evaluation Matrix The Space Coast TPO (TPO) will be working with each of the partner municipalities to conduct a preliminary assessment of potential sites. We are asking your help to conduct a self-evaluation of candidate sites within your municipality by filling out the information below and on the next page. Please attach a map of the candidate parcel. Provide any additional supporting documentation for each of the measures to help with the analysis.

In addition to the information provided in this document, the TPO will share relevant GIS data to help complete this assessment. If you have questions or need assistance with the analysis, TPO staff are available to help. Please contact XXXX XXXXXX at [email protected] or 321-690-6890.

Contact Information

Jurisdiction E-mail

Contact Phone

Name Number

Parcel Information

Parcel Location (tax parcel ID or address)

Notes:

Tier 1: Parcel Requirements

Yes No 1. Can the candidate location accommodate a platform on the west side of the track(s)? 2. Is the candidate location adjacent to a minimum 1,000 foot tangent section of track? 3. Is the candidate location at least 3 acres in size?

4. Is the candidate location largely free of wetlands and flood plain impacts? 5. Is the candidate location close to all utilities (water, sewer, telecommunications, power)? 6. Is the candidate location compatible with area neighborhood?

Proceed to Tier 2 ONLY if all responses to Tier 1 are YES Tier 2: Evaluation Criteria Criterion Evaluation Parameter How to Measure Response

7. Developable Sites owned by FEC preferred List all owners of candidate parcel(s) parcel Parcel size What is the total parcel size (acres)?

Developable parcel size What is the total developable size (acres)?

8. Development Acres of vacant or underutilized parcels immediately adjacent Adjacency to developable potential to property (Underutilized parcels have improved property parcels preferred value is less than 40% of total value) Most developable land Acres of vacant or underutilized parcels within 5-minute drive preferred 9. Visibility Most vehicles passing site AADT of each street with access and visibility to the site preferred Redevelopment Potential Sites with more street Linear feet of street frontage frontage will be preferred

10. Incentives Site with development Are there any local incentives available (such as CRA)? If so, incentives preferred please list

11. Local street Sites with two or more full Does the parcel frontage allow for multiple access points? Yes No access access driveways preferred Identify the primary arterial roadway(s) used to directly access the parcel Sites near roadways with available capacity preferred What is the Level of Service? What is the traffic volume? 12. Access to Ports Sites within 5 minutes of the Distance via shortest route to SR 528 (Beachline) at SR 401 Port preferred interchange near Port Canaveral Sites within 5 minutes of Distance via shortest route to NASA Blvd at Melbourne Airport preferred International Airport Entrance Road

Potential Ridership Ridership Potential 13. Access to Sites within 5 minutes of the Distance via shortest route to NASA Causeway at entrance destinations Beach preferred road to KSC Visitor Center 14. Access to regional Sites within 5 minutes of an Distance via shortest route to nearest I-95 or SR 528 highways interchange preferred interchange (whichever is closest) 15. Are there any other features of parcel or proximity to a feature that could increase ridership?

Appendix C Submitted Station Location Checklists

Site 1: Palm Bay-RJ Conlan Site 1: Palm Bay-RJ Conlan Site 1: Palm Bay-RJ Conlan Site 1: Palm Bay-RJ Conlan Site 1: Palm Bay-RJ Conlan Station Location Evaluation Matrix The Space Coast TPO (TPO) will be working with each of the partner municipalities to conduct a preliminary assessment of potential sites. We are asking your help to conduct a self-evaluation of one to three candidate sites within your municipality by filling out the information below and on the next page. Please attach a map of the candidate parcel. Provide any additional supporting documentation for each of the measures to help with the analysis.

In addition to the information provided in this document, the TPO will also share relevant GIS data to help complete this assessment. If you have questions or need assistance with the analysis, TPO staff are available to help. Please contact Leigh Holt at [email protected] or 321-690-6890.

Contact Information

Jurisdiction City of Melbourne E-mail slewis@melbourneflorid a

Contact Phone Shannon Lewis 321-608-7200 Name Number

Parcel Information Parcel Location Parcel 1 - Tax ID: 2824980 and Parcel 2 - Tax ID: 2824989, 2710 Main Street Melbourne FL 32901 (tax parcel ID or address)

The site (3.23 acres) is located in south Melbourne in the City's Downtown Notes: Community Redevelopment Area and is 225 feet away from US 1. Parcel 1 (2.68 acres) is vacant and Parcel 2 (.55 acres) is the location of a park. The site has over 1,800 feet of frontage along the west side of the FEC Railroad track.

Tier 1: Parcel Requirements

Yes No 1. Can the candidate location accommodate a platform on the west ■ side of the track(s)? 2. Is the candidate location adjacent to a straight line of track at least 1,000 foot in length with no grade crossings (or crossings that cannot ■ be closed)? 3. Is the candidate location at least three acres in size? ■

4. Is the candidate location largely free of wetlands and flood plain ■ impacts?

5. Is the candidate location close to all utilities (water, sewer, ■ telecommunications, power, fiber)? 6. Is the candidate location compatible with area neighborhood? ■

Proceed to Tier 2 ONLY if all responses to Tier 1 are YES

Site 2: Melbourne-Main Street Tier 2: Evaluation Criteria Criterion Evaluation Parameter How to Measure Response

7. Developable Sites ownership List all owners of candidate parcel(s) Florida East Coast RR and City of Melbourne parcel Parcel size What is the total parcel size (acres)? 3.23 acres Developable parcel size What is the total developable size (acres)? 3.23 acres 8. Development Acres of vacant or underutilized parcels immediately adjacent 7.04 acres potential Adjacency to developable parcels to property (Underutilized parcels have improved property value less than 40% of total property value)

Acres of vacant or underutilized parcels within ¼-mile 49.1 acres Proximity to developable land Acres of vacant or underutilized parcels within ½-mile 76.7 acres 9. Visibility Daily traffic volume of each street with access and visibility to Vehicles passing site the site See attachment for AADT volumes Sites with more street frontage Linear feet of street frontage 1,500 feet 10. Incentives Development incentives available Are there any local incentives available? If so, please list See attachment

15. Are there any other features of parcel or proximity to a Less than one mile to the Downtown Melbourne Entertainment District - 24 restaurants, 11 feature that could increase ridership? bars/taverns, a microbrewery, and a proposed hotel. Also within 1.6 miles of Florida Tech (FIT). Site 2: Melbourne-Main Street Site 3: Melbourne-Waverly Place Site 3: Melbourne-Waverly Place Site 3: Melbourne-Waverly Place Site 3: Melbourne-Waverly Place Station Location Evaluation Matrix The Space Coast TPO (TPO) will be working with each of the partner municipalities to conduct a preliminary assessment of potential sites. We are asking your help to conduct a self-evaluation of one to three candidate sites within your municipality by filling out the information below and on the next page. Please attach a map of the candidate parcel. Provide any additional supporting documentation for each of the measures to help with the analysis.

Contact Information

Jurisdiction City of Melbourne E-mail slewis@melbourneflorid a

Contact Phone Shannon Lewis 321-608-7200 Name Number

Parcel Information Parcel Location This 3.34 acre site is part of a much larger parcel owned by the Melbourne International Airport - Tax ID: 2728400 (tax parcel ID or address)

The site is located on property owned by the Melbourne International Airport. It is approximately one mile from the entrance to the terminal. This property has frontage on Apollo Boulevard and is Notes: convenient to several other arterial roadways. The 4.30 acre parcel is currently vacant. The site has over 1,240 feet of frontage along the west side of the FEC Railroad track. Additional vacant land owned by the Airport is located north and west of the subject site.

Tier 1: Parcel Requirements

4. Is the candidate location largely free of wetlands and flood plain ■ impacts?

5. Is the candidate location close to all utilities (water, sewer, ■ telecommunications, power, fiber)? 6. Is the candidate location compatible with area neighborhood? ■

Proceed to Tier 2 ONLY if all responses to Tier 1 are YES

Site 4: Melbourne-Apollo Blvd. Tier 2: Evaluation Criteria Criterion Evaluation Parameter How to Measure Response

7. Developable Sites ownership List all owners of candidate parcel(s) Melbourne International Airport/City of Melbourne parcel Parcel size What is the total parcel size (acres)? 4.30 acres Developable parcel size What is the total developable size (acres)? 4.30 acres 8. Development Acres of vacant or underutilized parcels immediately adjacent See attachment potential Adjacency to developable parcels to property (Underutilized parcels have improved property value less than 40% of total property value)

Acres of vacant or underutilized parcels within ¼-mile See attachment Proximity to developable land Acres of vacant or underutilized parcels within ½-mile See attachment 9. Visibility Daily traffic volume of each street with access and visibility to Vehicles passing site See attachment for AADT information the site Sites with more street frontage Linear feet of street frontage 1,440 feet 10. Incentives Development incentives available Are there any local incentives available? If so, please list See attachment

15. Are there any other features of parcel or proximity to a One mile to the Melbourne International Airport terminal area. In addition, less than three miles to the Downtown feature that could increase ridership? Melbourne Entertainment District - 24 restaurants, 11 bars/taverns, a microbrewery, and a proposed hotel. Site 4: Melbourne-Apollo Blvd. Station Location Evaluation Matrix The Space Coast TPO (TPO) will be working with each of the partner municipalities to conduct a preliminary assessment of potential sites. We are asking your help to conduct a self-evaluation of one to three candidate sites within your municipality by filling out the information below and on the next page. Please attach a map of the candidate parcel. Provide any additional supporting documentation for each of the measures to help with the analysis.

Contact Information [email protected] Jurisdiction City of Rockledge E-mail

Contact Phone Alix Bernard 321-690-3978 Name Number

Parcel Information Parcel Location 2425530, 2425529 (tax parcel ID or address)

Notes:

Tier 1: Parcel Requirements

4. Is the candidate location largely free of wetlands and flood plain ■ impacts? 5. Is the candidate location close to all utilities (water, sewer, ■ telecommunications, power, fiber)? 6. Is the candidate location compatible with area neighborhood? ■

Proceed to Tier 2 ONLY if all responses to Tier 1 are YES

Site 5: Rockledge/Cocoa-Rosa L Jones Tier 2: Evaluation Criteria Criterion Evaluation Parameter How to Measure Response

7. Developable Sites ownership List all owners of candidate parcel(s) Florida Power & Light parcel Parcel size What is the total parcel size (acres)? 32.97 acres Developable parcel size What is the total developable size (acres)? 29.61 acres 8. Development Acres of vacant or underutilized parcels immediately adjacent 4.19 acres (underutilized) potential Adjacency to developable parcels to property (Underutilized parcels have improved property value less than 40% of total property value)

Acres of vacant or underutilized parcels within ¼-mile 11.99 acres (underutilized) Proximity to developable land Acres of vacant or underutilized parcels within ½-mile 10 acres (underutilized) 9. Visibility Daily traffic volume of each street with access and visibility to Vehicles passing site the site 32,920 Sites with more street frontage Linear feet of street frontage 475 Ft on Rosa L. Jones Dr. 10. Incentives Development incentives available Are there any local incentives available? If so, please list Yes

11. Local street Number of access driveways Does the parcel frontage allow for multiple full access points? ■ Yes No access Identify the primary arterial roadway(s) used to directly access US 1 to Rosa L Jones to Huntington Ln Vehicle capacity on nearby the parcel roadways What is the current roadway corridor Level of Service? B 12. Access to Port Distance via shortest route to SR 528 (Beachline) at SR 401 Proximity to Canaveral Space Port Centers interchange near Port Canaveral 17 minutes, 12 miles Proximity to Melbourne Distance via shortest route to NASA Blvd at Melbourne International Airport International Airport Entrance Road 30 minutes, 19 miles 13. Access to cultural Proximity to Kennedy Space Distance via shortest route to NASA Causeway at entrance destinations Center road to KSC Visitor Center 32 minutes, 16 miles Proximity to cultural and Number of tourist sites, historic districts, and arts districts recreational destinations within 1 mile (Refer to attached figure) 5 14. Access to regional Distance via shortest route to nearest I-95 or SR 528 Proximity to nearest interchange I95 9 minutes 4.2 miles, SR 528 8 minutes 4 miles highways interchange (whichever is closest) 15. Are there any other features of parcel or proximity to a This site is located 1 block south of SR 520, which also provides access to the port and Orlando. feature that could increase ridership? locating a station in the Center of the County makes easy access for all Brevard residents as well as being able to accommodate tourists going to the port and OIA Site 5: Rockledge/Cocoa-Rosa L Jones Site 5: Rockledge/Cocoa-Rosa L Jones Site 5: Rockledge/Cocoa-Rosa L Jones Site 5: Rockledge/Cocoa-Rosa L Jones Site 5: Rockledge/Cocoa-Rosa L Jones Site 5: Rockledge/Cocoa-Rosa L Jones Site 6: Cocoa-Plaza Parkway Site 6: Cocoa-Plaza Parkway Site 6: Cocoa-Plaza Parkway Site 6: Cocoa-Plaza Parkway Site 6: Cocoa-Plaza Parkway Site 7: Cocoa-Michigan Avenue Site 7: Cocoa-Michigan Avenue Site 7: Cocoa-Michigan Avenue Site 7: Cocoa-Michigan Avenue Site 7: Cocoa-Michigan Avenue Site 8: Cocoa-Clearlake Road Site 8: Cocoa-Clearlake Road Site 8: Cocoa-Clearlake Road Site 8: Cocoa-Clearlake Road Site 8: Cocoa-Clearlake Road Site 9: Cocoa-Beau Geste Rd Site 9: Cocoa-Beau Geste Rd Site 9: Cocoa-Beau Geste Rd Site 9: Cocoa-Beau Geste Rd Site 9: Cocoa-Beau Geste Rd