DOCSLIB.ORG

Lake Transit Hub Location Plan Final

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lake Transit Hub Location Plan Final Lake Transit Hub Location Plan Final Prepared for the Lake County/City Area Planning Council Prepared by LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. LAKE TRANSIT HUB LOCATION PLAN FINAL Prepared for the Lake County/City Area Planning Council Under Work Element 6 of the Overall Work Program Prepared by LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. 2690 Lake Forest Road PO Box 5875 Tahoe City, CA 96145 (530) 583-4053 June 7, 2017 LSC #157560 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE I Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 II Existing Setting ..................................................................................................... 5 Lake County and the City of Clearlake....................................................... 5 Existing Lake County and Clearlake Plans ................................................ 9 III Existing Service .................................................................................................. 13 Existing Lake Transit Services ................................................................. 13 Transit Operations ................................................................................... 16 IV Existing Site Conditions ...................................................................................... 21 Existing Transfer Point ............................................................................. 21 V Lake Transit Hub Site Selections ........................................................................ 27 Alternative Site Discussion ...................................................................... 27 VI Transit Center Security Peer Review .................................................................. 43 VII Potential Hub Design Features ........................................................................... 53 Existing and Future Transit Center Program Elements ............................ 53 VIII Lake Transit Hub Location Plan .......................................................................... 59 Preferred Sites ......................................................................................... 59 Alternative Site ......................................................................................... 78 Backup Site .............................................................................................. 79 Potential Funding Sources ....................................................................... 79 Appendix A – Public Input Materials Appendix B – Security Review Maps Appendix C – Security Review Interviews Appendix D – Full Security Report Lake Transit Hub Location Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Prepared for the Lake County/City Area Planning Council Page i LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE 1 Population within Lake County ............................................................................. 7 2 Population Projections within Lake County ........................................................... 8 3 LTA Fixed Route Ridership by Route between FY 2013 and FY 2015 ............... 17 4 Lake Transit Authority Vehicle Fleet ................................................................... 18 5 Clearlake Boarding and Alighting Summary ....................................................... 18 6 Existing AM Peak Hour Transit Buses at Ray’s Market ...................................... 18 7 Existing PM Peak Hour Transit Buses at Ray’s Market ...................................... 23 8 Safety Incidents Reported by LTA at the Existing Transfer Point ....................... 26 9 Alternative Site Comparison ............................................................................... 34 10 Peer Transit Centers Near Schools .................................................................... 44 11 Summary of Essential Transit Facility Components and Associated Space Requirements .......................................................................................... 54 12 Summary of Potential Transit Facility Components and Associated .................. 56 13 Lake Transit Corner Transfer Center Cost Estimate ........................................... 70 14 Lake Transit Mid-Block Transfer Center Cost Estimate ...................................... 73 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE PAGE 1 Lake County Site Map .......................................................................................... 4 2 Lake Transit routes ............................................................................................. 14 3 Existing Transfer Hub Location ........................................................................... 22 4 Alternative Sites for a New Transfer Hub Location ............................................. 28 5 Corner Option – Plan view .................................................................................. 60 6 Mid-Block Option – Plan View ............................................................................ 61 7 Corner Option – Bird’s Eye View ........................................................................ 63 8 Corner Option – Main Entry ................................................................................ 64 9 Corner option – Breezeway View ....................................................................... 65 10 Mid-Block Option – Bird’s Eye View ................................................................... 66 11 Mid-Block Option – Main Entry and Breezeway View ......................................... 67 12 Mid-Block Option – Bus Shelter View ................................................................. 68 LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Lake Transit Hub Location Plan Page ii Prepared for the Lake County/City Area Planning Council Chapter 1 Introduction PROJECT OVERVIEW Lake Transit provides public transit service throughout Lake County including the cities and unincorporated communities, as well as providing connections to Napa County and Mendocino County. An important factor in an effective regional transit network is the transfer point where passengers make connections between routes. The existing transfer site (located at the former Ray’s Food Place Supermarket in the City of Clearlake) for Lake Transit Authority (LTA) includes several deficiencies, particularly pertaining to security issues, inadequate size (requiring turnaround on private land), poor public image, and a lack of control over land and utilities. To address this, the Lake Area Planning Council (APC) has initiated a study of locating a new and enhanced transit hub. While Lake Transit ridership levels declined in the most recent recession and as the result of a labor strike, in the last few years transit improvements have led to a rise in ridership levels. An improved transit center is important in enhancing the overall transit program, and ensuring that adequate capacity is available to accommodate future ridership growth. Transit centers are key elements of a successful public transit agency, for the following reasons: To the passenger, the facility is a crucial link in the overall transit trip and optimally should provide easy access, comfort, protection from the elements, a sense of security, pleasant surroundings, and a clear view of the approaching bus. To the public, passenger facilities are essential in forming the public perception of the transit program, they are visible “on the street,” and part of the community 24/7. To the service provider, facilities can make the boarding and alighting process safer in terms of traffic and passenger safety, and more efficient by speeding passenger boarding through the provision of effective queuing areas, thereby reducing delays getting in and out of traffic. With the assistance of a consulting team consisting of LSC Transportation Consultants, Design Workshop and WRLDCO Consulting, this study evaluates potential sites for a new transit facility for the Lake Transit. More specifically, this study is intended to identify the program, site and configuration of a new transit transfer facility that can maximize the effectiveness of the transportation program, provide secure services and amenities to the riders of the transit service, and serve as a positive element in Lake Transit Hub Location Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Prepared for the Lake County/City Area Planning Council Page 1 downtown Clearlake. This facility is intended to focus on the needs of the transit passengers, and not to serve as the office or maintenance/bus storage facility for Lake Transit. This document provides Lake APC, Lake Transit, the City of Clearlake and the public with a summary of existing site conditions and program requirements, an evaluation of potential project sites, and findings on the part of the Consultant Team. The first chapter presents a review of existing local plans and policies in Lake County as well as an overview of demographic trends which typically lead to public transit usage. Next, a summary of the local transit program and the associated requirements for a transit center are presented. The later chapters evaluate a series of potential transit site options, along with the advantages and disadvantages of each. Lastly, this document provides recommendations for a preferred site, alternative site and back-up site for a new transfer hub along with a program, and general design concepts. STAKEHOLDER AND COMMUNITY INPUT A wide variety of community input was sought as part of this planning process. Appendix A presents supporting materials for the stakeholder/community
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transit Energy Use Reduction Plan
    Lake Country Transit Energy Use Reduction Plan Energy Use Reduction, Capital Expenditure, Funding and Management/Training Plan December 2015 Prepared by ICF International 620 Folsom St, Suite 200 San Francisco, CA 94107 415.677.7100 Lake Country Transit Energy Use Reduction Plan Table of Contents Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 1 1 Energy Use Reduction Plan ............................................................................................................ 4 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 4 1.2 Facility ......................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2.1 Review of Existing Facility and Operations .................................................................................6 1.2.2 Facility, Operations and Maintenance Strategies .......................................................................7 1.3 Vehicle Fleet and Alternative Fuels .......................................................................................... 16 1.3.1 Review of Fleet Operations ...................................................................................................... 16 1.3.2 Alternative Fuel Options .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Woodland Transit Study
    Woodland Transit Study Prepared for the Yolo County Transportation District Prepared by LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Woodland Transit Study Prepared for the Yolo County Transportation District 350 Industrial Way Woodland, CA 95776 530 402-2819 Prepared by LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. P.O. Box 5875 2690 Lake Forest Road, Suite C Tahoe City, California 96145 530 583-4053 April 27, 2016 LSC #157020 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page 1 Introduction and Key Study Issues ............................................................................... 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 Study Issues ................................................................................................................ 1 2 Existing Community Conditions .................................................................................... 3 Geography of Yolo County .......................................................................................... 3 Demographics ............................................................................................................. 3 Economy ................................................................................................................... 13 3 Review of Existing Transit Services ............................................................................ 19 Yolo County Transportation District ........................................................................... 19 Existing Woodland
    [Show full text]
  • Lake County/City Area Planning Council on an Annual Basis; And
    Lisa Davey-Bates, Executive Director Wanda Gray, Regional Director Administration Operations 367 North State Street, Ste. 204 P.O. Box 698 Ukiah, CA 95482 Lower Lake, CA 95457 (707) 263-7868 (707) 994-3384 www.laketransit.org DATE: June 3, 2020 TIME: 10:00 a.m. (or as soon thereafter as the Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies Meeting Adjourns) PLACE: Audioconference Dial-in number: 1 (669) 900-6833 / Meeting ID: 937 5301 2617# *Zoom link provided to Board Members in distribution email and to public by request. In accordance with the modified Brown Act Requirements established by Governor Newsom’s Executive Order N-29-20, and to facilitate Social Distancing due to COVID-19, Lake Transit Authority’s Board meeting will be by audioconference. Public comments will be available during Wednesday's meeting on any agenda item. Please send comments to our Board Secretary, Charlene Parker, at [email protected] and note the agenda item number being addressed. Oral comments will also be accepted by telephone during the meeting when public comment is invited by the Chair. 1. Call Meeting to Order 2. Roll Call PUBLIC EXPRESSION 3. Public input on any unmet transit need or any other item within the jurisdiction of this agency, but which is not otherwise on the above agenda CONSENT CALENDAR 4. Approval of Minutes of the May 6, 2020 meeting Review and proposed approval 5. Technical Revision of the Amendment between Lake Transit Authority and Paratransit Services, Inc. Review and proposed approval REGULAR CALENDAR 6. Fiscal Year 2018-19 Federal Single Audit Report and Financial Statements Review and proposed approval 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Solanoexpress Bus Routes Transit Information Fairfield Transportation Center Fairfield
    Regional Transit Map Transit REGIONAL TRANSIT DIAGRAM To To Eureka Clearlake Information Mendocino Transit DOWNTOWN AREA TRANSIT CONNECTIONS Authority To Ukiah Lake Oakland Mendocino Transit 12th Street Oakland City Center BART: Greyhound BART, AC Transit FA FA 19th Street Oakland BART: FA BART, AC Transit Cloverdale San Francisco Yolobus To Davis Civic Center/UN Plaza BART: Winters Fairfi eld and Suisun Transit SolanoExpress is Solano SolanoExpress is Solano BART, Muni, Golden Gate Transit, SamTrans Fairfield 101 Embarcadero BART & Ferry Terminal: County’s intercity transit connection. County’s intercity transit connection. BART, Golden Gate Transit, Muni, SamTrans, (FAST) is the local transit system Baylink, Alameda/Oakland Ferry, Alameda Harbor Faireld and Healdsburg Bay Ferry, Blue & Gold Fleet, Amtrak CA Thruway Suisun Transit SolanoExpress routes connect cities SolanoExpress routes connect cities Transit To Sacramento for Fairfi eld and Suisun City and also Mongomery Street BART: Healdsburg BART, Muni, Golden Gate Transit, SamTrans Dixon within the county and provide service within the county and provide service Calistoga Readi- operates many of the SolanoExpress (Operated by FAST) (Operated by SolTrans) Handi Powell Street BART: Transportation Ride Van Calistoga BART, Muni, Golden Gate Transit, SamTrans regional routes. Please visit www.fasttransit. to neighboring counties, BART, and the ferry. to neighboring counties, BART, and the ferry. San Francisco Caltrain at 4th & King: Dixon Windsor Deer Caltrain, Muni, Amtrak CA Thruway org or call 707-422-BUSS (707-422-2877) for For more information, call (800) 535-6883 or For more information, call (800) 535-6883 or Park Transbay Temporary Terminal: Guerneville AC Transit, Muni, Golden Gate Transit, SamTrans, 80 visit www.solanoexpress.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Location Database Technical Documentation and User Guide
    SMART LOCATION DATABASE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION AND USER GUIDE Version 3.0 Updated: June 2021 Authors: Jim Chapman, MSCE, Managing Principal, Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. (UD4H) Eric H. Fox, MScP, Senior Planner, UD4H William Bachman, Ph.D., Senior Analyst, UD4H Lawrence D. Frank, Ph.D., President, UD4H John Thomas, Ph.D., U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization Alexis Rourk Reyes, MSCRP, U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization About This Report The Smart Location Database is a publicly available data product and service provided by the U.S. EPA Smart Growth Program. This version 3.0 documentation builds on, and updates where needed, the version 2.0 document.1 Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. updated this guide for the project called Updating the EPA GSA Smart Location Database. Acknowledgements Urban Design 4 Health was contracted by the U.S. EPA with support from the General Services Administration’s Center for Urban Development to update the Smart Location Database and this User Guide. As the Project Manager for this study, Jim Chapman supervised the data development and authored this updated user guide. Mr. Eric Fox and Dr. William Bachman led all data acquisition, geoprocessing, and spatial analyses undertaken in the development of version 3.0 of the Smart Location Database and co- authored the user guide through substantive contributions to the methods and information provided. Dr. Larry Frank provided data development input and reviewed the report providing critical input and feedback. The authors would like to acknowledge the guidance, review, and support provided by: • Ruth Kroeger, U.S. General Services Administration • Frank Giblin, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • West Marin Transit Needs Assessment Existing Conditions Report
    MARIN TRANSIT West Marin Transit Needs Assessment Existing Conditions Report March 2009 West Marin Transit Needs Assessment Existing Conditions MARIN TRANSIT Table of Contents Page Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 1 Background and Project Goals ................................................................................................. 1 Existing Services ...................................................................................................................... 1 Stakeholder Consultation and Public Outreach ........................................................................ 2 Financial Overview ................................................................................................................... 4 Next Steps ................................................................................................................................ 4 Chapter 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................... 5 Methodology ............................................................................................................................. 5 Study Area ................................................................................................................................ 5 Report Organization ................................................................................................................. 8 Chapter 2. Demographic
    [Show full text]
  • Solano Express Bus Routes Transit Information Pleasant Hill Station Area Contra Costa Centre
    Fare Information effective January 1, 2016 Senior3 Adult/ (65+) Youth2 County Connection & (6-64) For more detailed information about BART Disabled service, please see the BART Schedule, BART 1 Transit CASH FARES (exact change only) Regional Transit Map System Map, and other BART information REGIONAL TRANSIT DIAGRAM displays in this station. Regular Ride $2.00 $1.00 To To Express Ride (900 series route numbers) $2.25 $1.00 Eureka Clearlake Information Mendocino Transit DOWNTOWN AREA TRANSIT CONNECTIONS PREPAID FARES Authority To Ukiah Lake Oakland ® 4 $2.00 $1.00 Mendocino Transit 12th Street Oakland City Center BART: Clipper Cash Value Greyhound BART, AC Transit 19th Street Oakland BART: 5 $3.75 $1.75 BART, AC Transit Day Pass Cloverdale San Francisco Yolobus To Davis Discount Regular/Express 20-Ride Pass N/A $15.00 Civic Center/UN Plaza BART: Winters BART, Muni, Golden Gate Transit, SamTrans Commuter Card (20 Regular+BART Transfer-Rides) $40.00 N/A Pleasant Hill 101 Embarcadero BART & Ferry Terminal: BART, Golden Gate Transit, Muni, SamTrans, Baylink, Alameda/Oakland Ferry, Alameda Harbor Faireld and 6 $60.00 N/A Healdsburg Bay Ferry, Blue & Gold Fleet, Amtrak CA Thruway Suisun Transit East Bay Regional Local 31-Day Transit To Sacramento Mongomery Street BART: Healdsburg BART, Muni, Golden Gate Transit, SamTrans Dixon 6 $70.00 N/A Calistoga Readi- County Connection (CCCTA) effective January 1, 2016 East Bay Regional Express 31-Day Handi Powell Street BART: San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Fare Information Station Area Ride BART Red* Ticket
    [Show full text]
  • Homelessness in Transit Environments Volume I: Findings from a Survey of Public Transit Operators
    UC Office of the President ITS reports Title Homelessness in Transit Environments Volume I: Findings from a Survey of Public Transit Operators Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/55d481p8 Authors Loukaitou-Sideris, Anastasia Wasserman, Jacob Caro, Ryan et al. Publication Date 2020-12-17 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California RESEARCH REPORT Institute of Transportation Studies Homelessness in Transit Environments Volume I: Findings from a Survey of Public Transit Operators Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris, PhD, Distinguished Professor of Urban Planning, UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs Jacob Wasserman, Research Project Manager Ryan Caro, Graduate Student Researcher Hao Ding, Graduate Student Researcher UCLA Institute of Transportation Studies December 2020 Report No.: UC-ITS-2021-13 | DOI: 10.17610/T6V317 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. UC-ITS-2021-13 N/A N/A 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Homelessness in Transit Environments December 2020 Volume I: Findings from a Survey of Public Transit Operators 6. Performing Organization Code UCLA-ITS 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris, Ph.D., https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0186-4751; Jacob N/A Wasserman https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2212-5798; Ryan Caro, https://orcid. org/0000-0002-2795-7270; Hao Ding, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5286-3367 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Institute of Transportation Studies, UCLA N/A 3320 Public Affairs Building 11. Contract or Grant No. Los Angeles, CA 90095-1656 UC-ITS-2021-13 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Zeroing in on Zebs 2020 Edition
    ZEROING IN ON ZEBS 2020 EDITION THE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY TRANSIT BUS INDEX: A NORTH AMERICAN ZEB INVENTORY REPORT December 2020 A CALSTART Report By John Jackson, Bryan Lee, and Fred Silver www.calstart.org Zeroing in on ZEBs: 2020 Edition Copyright © 2020 by CALSTART. All rights reserved. This report was funded by funding from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), and the California Air Resources Board (CARB) Hybrid and Zero-Emission Truck and Bus Voucher Incentive Project (HVIP). No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission by CALSTART. Requests for permission or further information should be addressed to CALSTART, 48 S. Chester Ave, Pasadena, CA 91106. This document is based on information gathered in December 2020. This is the 2020 edition of this document. i Zeroing in on ZEBs: 2020 Edition List of Acronyms APTA American Public Transit Association BEB Battery Electric Bus CAA Clean Air Act CARB California Air Resources Board FCEB Fuel Cell Electric Bus FAA Federal Aviation Administration FTA Federal Transit Administration GVWR Gross Vehicle Weight Rating HVIP Hybrid and Zero-Emission Truck and Bus Voucher Incentive Project ICT Innovative Clean Transit kW kilowatt LoNo Federal Transit Administration Low or No Emissions Program MOU Memorandum of Understanding MW Megawatt TIRCP Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program TIUOO Total In-Use or On-Order U.S. United States of America ZEB Zero-Emission Bus ii Zeroing in on ZEBs: 2020 Edition Table of Contents List of Acronyms ............................................................................................................................ ii Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fy19-20 Low Carbon Transit Operations Program Allocation Award List
    Caltrans-Division of Rail and Mass Transportation FY19-20 LOW CARBON TRANSIT OPERATIONS PROGRAM ALLOCATION AWARD LIST Disadvantaged Low 1/2 Mile Low- Community Income Income Buffer Total Project Project Benefit Benefit Benefit Request SB 1119 District Project ID Lead Agency: Project Name: Type: Project Description (Short): FY19-20 City of Arcata (Arcata Mad River Transit To allow Free Transit to encourage ridership on Arcata Mad River Transit NO YES NO #N/A 1 19-20-D01-001 System) AMRTS Free Fares Operations System $13,339 This project will provide reduced fares and free ticket vouchers to raise Humboldt Transit Reduced Fares and Free awareness of public transportation. This will give riders an opportunity to NO YES NO #N/A 1 19-20-D01-002 Authority Ticket Vouchers Operations try transit at no cost. $303,307 This project provides for the purchase and installation of a solar canopy to cover the bus parking lot. The canopy will provide enough electricity to power four electric buses and the operations facility. The canopy will also shade the lot, reducing the time buses are idling prior to inspection and NO YES NO #N/A 1 19-20-D01-003 Lake Transit Authority Solar Canopy Project Capital start-up. $102,736 The project will provide unlimited free use of Lake Transit Authority bus routes anywhere in Lake, Napa, or Mendocino counties for the following: Free Fares for Community (1) any Mendocino College or Woodland College student displaying a College Students and the valid student identification and (2) any child between the age of 7 and 17 NO YES NO #N/A 1 19-20-D01-004 Lake Transit Authority Summer Cruisin' Program Operations between June 15 and August 31 (known as the Summer Cruisin' Program) $23,351 RCTA will use LCTOP funding in a three-year bus electrification project, planning an installing an electric recharge facility and augmenting an FTA bus grant to purchase an electric powered vehicle.
    [Show full text]
  • Calact Fall 2012 Program Final by Moore.Pdf
    Fall Conference 2012 WELCOME Photo: Richard Wood Dear CalACT members and conference attendees, Welcome to the Monterey Bay region and the 2012 CalACT Fall Conference and EXPO taking place September 18-21 at the Monterey Plaza Hotel and Spa located in the City of Monterey’s historic Cannery Row. An extensive program has been planned for you, including informative workshops, networking opportunities, and a tour of Monterey- Salinas Transit’s unique “JAZZ” Bus Rapid Transit project which will be under construction during the conference. MST strives to provide a high-quality transportation network serving communities throughout the Central Coast region utilizing innovative partnerships with community stakeholders (including hospitality, agriculture, education, and military installations) to develop efficient community transportation and mobility management resources. In recent years MST has implemented a robust program of mobility management programs including travel training, and alternative transportation options for seniors and members of our disabled community through activities at the Bus Stop Shop located in Old Monterey. Find out more about mobility management by attending the ADA Roundtable being held in conjunction with the Fall Conference and EXPO September 18-21. Whether you come to Monterey to review best practices, share new ideas, discuss the state of public transportation, network with old friends, or meet new ones, I’m certain there will be a conference session or activity to meet your needs. If your interests lie in exploring coastal trails of Big Sur; visiting the Monterey Bay Aquarium; stopping by the wineries of Carmel Valley; discovering the shops, boutiques, and restaurants on the Monterey Peninsula; or visiting the Steinbeck Museum and exploring the history of the Salinas Valley, there is an MST route that can take you there.
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2018-19 SGR Project List
    2018-19 State Of Good Repair Approved Project List 2018-19 Recipient Sub-Recipient Project Title Estimated total SGR Allocation Amount* San Joaquin Council of Governments San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission - to Altamont Facility Upgrades and Improvements $256,937 Corridor Express (ACE) Metropolitan Transportation Commission Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority - to Facility Upgrades and Improvements $31,362 Altamont Corridor Express (ACE) Metropolitan Transportation Commission Alameda County Congestion Management Agency - to Facility Upgrades and Improvements $40,599 Altamont Corridor Express (ACE) San Joaquin Council of Governments San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority - to Altamont Facility Upgrades and Improvements $44 Corridor Express (ACE) Metropolitan Transportation Commission Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority - to Facility Upgrades and Capital Improvements $0 Altamont Corridor Express (ACE) San Joaquin Council of Governments San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission - to Altamont Railcar Midlife Overhaul $0 Corridor Express (ACE) Metropolitan Transportation Commission Metropolitan Transportation Commission Clipper®/Clipper® 2.0 $10,250,287 Metropolitan Transportation Commission Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District East Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) $3,053,265 Metropolitan Transportation Commission San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District STA SGR Preventative Maintenance $5,980,007 Metropolitan Transportation Commission City of San Francisco Muni Facility Rehabilitation Campaign $9,794,303 Metropolitan Transportation
    [Show full text]