Scientist Emeritus Program Review Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Scientist Emeritus Program Review Report Scientist Emeritus Program Review Report A report prepared by the Scientist Emeritus Program Review Panel March 15, 2006 Report submitted to Linda Gundersen, Acting, Associate Director for Geology U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Contents Executive Summary...................................................................................................................1 Introduction................................................................................................................................3 History and Current Program.....................................................................................................4 History of SE Program.........................................................................................................4 Current SE Program.............................................................................................................4 Communication..........................................................................................................................5 Levels of Communication....................................................................................................5 Opportunities and Responsibilities of SE ............................................................................6 Technical and Administrative Support ......................................................................................7 Space Issues ...............................................................................................................................9 Publications..............................................................................................................................10 Unfinished work – what to do?..........................................................................................10 Finished work – where to publish? ....................................................................................10 Archiving of Scientist Emeritus Material ................................................................................10 Strategies for Recognition........................................................................................................12 Mentoring...........................................................................................................................12 Recognition/appreciation ...................................................................................................12 Web site.............................................................................................................................13 Tracking of hours...............................................................................................................13 Policy Statement ......................................................................................................................14 Scientist Emeritus – Team .................................................................................................15 Scientist Emeritus – at-Large.............................................................................................15 Scientist Emeritus – Bradley Scholar Program..................................................................15 Scientist Emeritus – Honorary...........................................................................................16 Ethics Rules for Scientist Emeritus....................................................................................17 Funding ....................................................................................................................................18 Funding Mechanism...........................................................................................................19 Cost/benefit........................................................................................................................20 Strengths/Weakness of SE Program ........................................................................................21 Conclusion ...............................................................................................................................22 Appendix 1 ..............................................................................................................................24 Scientist Emeritus Questionnaire.......................................................................................24 Scientist Emeritus Responses to Questionnaire.................................................................28 Appendix 2 ..............................................................................................................................33 Scientist Emeritus Publications 2000-2006 .......................................................................33 Scientist Emeritus Abstracts 2000-2006............................................................................62 Appendix 3 – Checklist for Managers, New Scientist Emeritus .............................................72 Appendix 4 – Yearly Checklist for Managers .........................................................................74 Appendix 5 .............................................................................................................................75 Scientist Emeritus Questionnaire to Team Chief Scientists and Project Chiefs................75 Team Chief Scientists and Project Chiefs Responses to Questionnaire ............................79 Appendix 6 – FY 05 Scientist Emeritus OE and Space Information.......................................84 Appendix 7 – Scientist Emeritus Comments to Questionnaire................................................85 Appendix 8 – “Tips for Ensuring Proper Records Management During Change”................129 i Appendix 9 – GD Scientist Emeritus Time Log....................................................................131 Appendix 10 – Proposed Policy Statement............................................................................135 Appendix 11 – Scientist Emeritus Program Annual Progress Review Form ........................139 Appendix 12 – Scientist Emeritus Agreement Form Information.........................................140 Appendix 13 – Scientist Emeritus Funding Mechanism Flow Chart ....................................142 Appendix 14 – Team Chief Scientist & Project Chief Comments to Questionnaire.............143 Table 1. Number of hours worked by 106 SE....................................................................................20 ii Scientist Emeritus Program Review Report A report prepared by the Scientist Emeritus Program Review Panel. Executive Summary The Scientist Emeritus (SE) Program has been and continues to be an important component of the Geologic Discipline (GD). This Program offers retirees an opportunity to continue their professional association with the U.S. Geological Survey and contribute their time and talents to a wide variety of projects. In the fall of 2005, the acting Associate Director for Geology established a committee to conduct a thorough review of and make recommendations for this Program. This report presents a brief history of the Program, analyzes data that the committee collected about the current Program, and makes recommendations for improvements to the Program. In FY05, GD spent $840,000 on the SE Program for 194 SE. Of this amount, $640,000 was spent on space charges, which is paid whether the SE occupy the space or not, and $201,000 was spent on operating expenses. Based on the data collected, the monetary benefit was calculated to be $5,724,750 per year based on salary estimated at a GS-14/5 for actual volunteer hours. This is almost a 7-fold return on an $840,000 investment or a 28-fold return on a $201,000 investment. Some of the activities SE are involved in include serving on outside scientific advisory panels, providing technical leadership to younger research and operational scientists, being an active member of Team projects, and producing 550 publications from 2000-2006. The GD SE Program has greatly benefited the USGS by allowing scientists to continue their research, outreach, and mentoring activities at minimal expense to the organization. These contributions increase the productivity of the USGS and enhance its visibility and image to external audiences. The SE provide the USGS with a breadth and depth of wisdom and knowledge that was gained through many years of experience and leadership in their fields. The current SE Program is an excellent volunteer program, but it can benefit from some minor modifications. The glue binds these modifications together to make a more powerful SE program is the leadership that management provides at all levels – Team, regional and national. Through implementation of the recommendations provided in this report, GD management can move the SE Program successfully into the future. The committee recommendations for the SE Program are summarized below. Implement “Yearly Checklists for Managers,” a tool for local managers to increase communication with their SE, keep up-to-date e-mail lists, clarify expectations, help determine appropriate funding levels, address identified problems, and obtain an Annual Progress Review. 1 Re-establish and expand the Bradley Scholar Program to support the investigation of science research frontiers that have potential importance to the Nation. Fund the Bradley Scholar Program through the Associate Director for Geology’s Office. Encourage Program Coordinators to provide additional Bradley Scholar Program funds that would be used to
Recommended publications
  • Enrico SCHWABE Zoologische Staatssammlung Muenchen
    . , E. SCHWABE NOVAPEX 6 (4): 89-105, 10 décembre 2005 A catalogue of Récent and fossil chitons (MoUusca: Polyplacophora) Addenda Enrico SCHWABE Zoologische Staatssammlung Muenchen, Muenchhausenstrasse 2 1 D-81247 Muenchen, Germany [email protected] KEYWORDS. MoUusca, Polyplacophora, taxon list, bibliography ABSTRACT. This paper lists species-group names of Récent and fossil Polyplacophora (MoUusca) that were published after 1998 (for the Récent species) and 1987 (for the fossil species). A total of 171 species were since then introduced, of which 123 are attributed to valid fossil taxa and 48 to valid Récent taxa. The authorship and complète références are provided for each species-group name. INTRODUCTION Considerazioni suUa famiglia Leptochitonidae Dali, 1889 (MoUusca: Polyplacophora). III. Le species Taxonomic work is impossible without an overview of terziarie e quatemarie Europee, con note sistematiche the scientific names existing in the particular taxon e filogenetiche. - Atti délia prima Giornata di Studi group. Catalogues generally are a great tool to obtain Malacologici Centra lîaliano di Studi Malacologici such overviews, as they often summarize information (1989): 19-140 (: 79; pi. 26). otherwise hard to gather and master. Type locality: Pezzo, near Villa S. Giovanni (Reggio Of the nearly 2600 taxa introduced on species level Calabria prov.); in material of upper Pleistocene, but within the Polyplacophora, 368 fossils and 914 Récent presumably originated from adjacent deposits of lower species are considered as valid (closing date: Pleistocene of bathyal faciès [Pezzo, presso Villa S. 31/10/2005). Giovanni (RC); in materiale del Pleistocene superiore, In the past, excellent catalogues of species-group ma presumibilmente originato da contigui depositi del names in Polyplacophora were compiled by Kaas & Pleistocene inferiore di faciès batiale].
    [Show full text]
  • JEFFERSONIANA Contributions from the Virginia Museum of Natural History
    JEFFERSONIANA Contributions from the Virginia Museum of Natural History Number 19 10 January 2009 Unusual Cambrian Thrombolites from the Boxley Blue Ridge Quarry, Bedford County, Virginia Alton C. Dooley, Jr. ISSN 1061-1878 Virginia Museum of Natural History Jeffersoniana, Number 19, pp. 1-14 Scientific Publications Series Virginia Museum of Natural History The Virginia Museum of Natural History produces five scientific Unusual Cambrian Thrombolites from the Boxley Blue publication series, with each issue published as suitable material becomes Ridge Quarry, Bedford County, Virginia available and each numbered consecutively within its series. Topics consist of original research conducted by museum staff or affiliated ALTON C. DOOLEY , JR. investigators based on the museum’s collections or on subjects relevant to Virginia Museum of Natural History the museum’s areas of interest. All are distributed to other museums and 21 Starling Avenue libraries through our exchange program and are available for purchase by Martinsville, Virginia 24112, USA individual consumers. [email protected] Memoirs are typically larger productions: individual monographs on ABSTRACT a single subject such as a regional survey or comprehensive treatment of an entire group. The standardized format is an 8.5 x 11 inch page with two Three unusual thrombolites were collected in June 2008 from the Late columns. Cambrian Conococheague Formation at the Boxley Materials Blue Ridge Quarry in Bedford County, Virginia. These specimens are isolated low domes Jeffersoniana is an outlet for relatively short studies treating a single with a thrombolitic core and a pustulate, stromatolitic outer layer. The two subject, allowing for expeditious publication. The standardized format is largest domes have a distinctive thickened rim around their margins.
    [Show full text]
  • Shell Microstructures in Early Cambrian Molluscs
    Shell microstructures in Early Cambrian molluscs ARTEM KOUCHINSKY Kouchinsky, A. 2000. Shell microstructures in Early Cambrian molluscs. - Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 45,2, 119-150. The affinities of a considerable part of the earliest skeletal fossils are problematical, but investigation of their microstructures may be useful for understanding biomineralization mechanisms in early metazoans and helpful for their taxonomy. The skeletons of Early Cambrian mollusc-like organisms increased by marginal secretion of new growth lamel- lae or sclerites, the recognized basal elements of which were fibers of apparently aragon- ite. The juvenile part of some composite shells consisted of needle-like sclerites; the adult part was built of hollow leaf-like sclerites. A layer of mineralized prism-like units (low aragonitic prisms or flattened spherulites) surrounded by an organic matrix possibly existed in most of the shells with continuous walls. The distribution of initial points of the prism-like units on a periostracurn-like sheet and their growth rate were mostly regular. The units may be replicated on the surface of internal molds as shallow concave poly- gons, which may contain a more or less well-expressed tubercle in their center. Tubercles are often not enclosed in concave polygons and may co-occur with other types of tex- tures. Convex polygons seem to have resulted from decalcification of prism-like units. They do not co-occur with tubercles. The latter are interpreted as casts of pore channels in the wall possibly playing a role in biomineralization or pits serving as attachment sites of groups of mantle cells. Casts of fibers and/or lamellar units may overlap a polygonal tex- ture or occur without it.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambrian Substrate Revolution
    Vol. 10, No. 9 September 2000 INSIDE • Research Grants, p. 12 • Section Meetings Northeastern, p. 16 GSA TODAY Southeastern, p. 18 A Publication of the Geological Society of America • Happy Birthday, NSF, p. 22 The Cambrian Substrate Revolution David J. Bottjer, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0740, [email protected] James W. Hagadorn, Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, [email protected] Stephen Q. Dornbos, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0740, [email protected] ABSTRACT The broad marine ecological settings prevalent during the late Neo- proterozoic–early Phanerozoic (600–500 Ma) interval of early metazoan body plan origination strongly impacted the subsequent evolution and development of benthic metazoans. Recent work demonstrates that late Neoproterozoic seafloor sediment had well-developed microbial mats and poorly developed, vertically oriented bioturbation, thus producing fairly stable, relatively low water content substrates and a sharp water-sediment interface. Later in the Cambrian, seafloors with microbial mats became increasingly scarce in shallow-marine environments, largely due to the evolution of burrowing organisms with an increasing vertically oriented component to their bioturba- tion. The evolutionary and ecological effects of these substrate changes on Figure 1. Looping and meandering trace fossil Taphrhelminthopsis, made by a large Early Cambrian benthic metazoans, referred to as the bioturbator, on a bedding plane from Lower Cambrian Poleta Formation, White-Inyo Mountains, California. Such traces, consisting of a central trough between lateral ridges, occur in sandstones Cambrian substrate revolution, are deposited in shallow-marine environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Quitones (Mollusca: Polyplacophora) Del Mar Caribe
    Biota Colombiana ISSN: 0124-5376 [email protected] Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos "Alexander von Humboldt" Colombia Gracia C., Adriana; Díaz, Juan Manuel; Ardila, Néstor E. Quitones (Mollusca: Polyplacophora) del Mar Caribe Colombiano Biota Colombiana, vol. 6, núm. 1, junio, 2005, pp. 117-125 Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos "Alexander von Humboldt" Bogotá, Colombia Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=49106102 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto Biota Colombiana 6 (1) 117 - 125, 2005 Quitones (Mollusca: Polyplacophora) del Mar Caribe Colombiano Adriana Gracia C.1, Juan Manuel Díaz2, Néstor E. Ardila1 1 Museo de Historia Natural Marina de Colombia. INVEMAR. [email protected]; [email protected] Dirección de correspondencia: Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras, INVEMAR, A.A. 1016. Cerro de Punta Betín. Santa Marta. Colombia. 2 Instituto Alexander von Humboldt. [email protected] Palabras Clave: Quitones, Polyplacophora, Mollusca, Distribución, Caribe colombiano, Lista de especies Introducción Las especies litorales se alimentan en su mayoría de algas Los quitones o poliplacóforos constituyen una que crecen sobre la superficie de las rocas, y son raspadas de las ocho clases del filum Mollusca. Está conformada por y removidas mediante la rádula, un órgano bucal que se unas 875 especies vivientes reconocidas, todas ellas mari- asimila a una lengua raspadora. Son animales poco activos, nas, que habitan desde la zona intermareal hasta profundida- que se mueven únicamente para alimentarse en las noches des abisales (Kaas & Van Belle 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • Sepkoski, J.J. 1992. Compendium of Fossil Marine Animal Families
    MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM Contributions . In BIOLOGY and GEOLOGY Number 83 March 1,1992 A Compendium of Fossil Marine Animal Families 2nd edition J. John Sepkoski, Jr. MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM Contributions . In BIOLOGY and GEOLOGY Number 83 March 1,1992 A Compendium of Fossil Marine Animal Families 2nd edition J. John Sepkoski, Jr. Department of the Geophysical Sciences University of Chicago Chicago, Illinois 60637 Milwaukee Public Museum Contributions in Biology and Geology Rodney Watkins, Editor (Reviewer for this paper was P.M. Sheehan) This publication is priced at $25.00 and may be obtained by writing to the Museum Gift Shop, Milwaukee Public Museum, 800 West Wells Street, Milwaukee, WI 53233. Orders must also include $3.00 for shipping and handling ($4.00 for foreign destinations) and must be accompanied by money order or check drawn on U.S. bank. Money orders or checks should be made payable to the Milwaukee Public Museum. Wisconsin residents please add 5% sales tax. In addition, a diskette in ASCII format (DOS) containing the data in this publication is priced at $25.00. Diskettes should be ordered from the Geology Section, Milwaukee Public Museum, 800 West Wells Street, Milwaukee, WI 53233. Specify 3Y. inch or 5Y. inch diskette size when ordering. Checks or money orders for diskettes should be made payable to "GeologySection, Milwaukee Public Museum," and fees for shipping and handling included as stated above. Profits support the research effort of the GeologySection. ISBN 0-89326-168-8 ©1992Milwaukee Public Museum Sponsored by Milwaukee County Contents Abstract ....... 1 Introduction.. ... 2 Stratigraphic codes. 8 The Compendium 14 Actinopoda.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics, Environment, and Biogeography of Some Late Cambrian and Early Ordovician Trilobites from Eastern New York State
    Systematics, Environment, and Biogeography of Some Late Cambrian and Early Ordovician Trilobites From Eastern New York State GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 834 Systematics, Environment, and Biogeography of Some Late Cambrian and Early Ordovician Trilobites From Eastern New York State By MICHAEL E. TAYLOR and ROBERT B. HALLEY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 834 The environmental setting and regional significance of two trilobite assemblages from shelf deposits of the fVhitehall Formation in the southern Champlain Valley UNITED STATES GOVERNl\1ENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON 197 4 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 73-60031 S For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price $1.35 (paper covers) Stock Number 2401-02459 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract 1 Systematic paleontology ------------------------­ 18 Introduction 1 Introductory statement ---------------------­ 18 Objectives ----------------------------------­ 1 Class Trilobita Walch, 1771 -----------------­ 19 Geologic setting ----------------------------­ 1 Family Catillicephalidae Raymond, 1938 --­ 19 Previous work ------------------------------­ 2 Genus Acheilops Ulrich, 1931 --------­ 19 Fossil collections ----------------------------­ 2 Genus Stenoc.hilina Ulrich, 1931 ------- 20 Acknowledgments --_- ------------------------ 2 Family Heterocaryonidae Hupe, 1953 _____ _ 21 Biostratigraphy ---------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Three-Dimensional Structure of the Shell Plate Assembly of the Chiton Tonicella Marmorea and Its Biomechanical Consequences
    Journal of Structural Biology 177 (2012) 314–328 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Journal of Structural Biology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/yjsbi Three-dimensional structure of the shell plate assembly of the chiton Tonicella marmorea and its biomechanical consequences Matthew J. Connors a, Hermann Ehrlich b, Martin Hog b, Clemence Godeffroy b, Sergio Araya c, Ilan Kallai d, ⇑ Dan Gazit d,e, Mary Boyce f, Christine Ortiz a, a Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA b Institute of Bioanalytical Chemistry, Dresden University of Technology, 01069 Dresden, Germany c Department of Architecture, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA d Skeletal Biotech Laboratory, The Hebrew University – Hadassah Faculty of Dental Medicine, Ein Kerem, Jerusalem 91120, Israel e Department of Surgery and Cedars-Sinai Regenerative Medicine Institute (CS-RMI), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA f Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA article info abstract Article history: This study investigates the three-dimensional structure of the eight plate exoskeletal (shell) assembly of Received 2 September 2011 the chiton Tonicella marmorea. X-ray micro-computed tomography and 3D printing elucidate the mech- Received in revised form 12 December 2011 anism of conformational change from a passive (slightly curved, attached to surface) to a defensive Accepted 14 December 2011 (rolled, detached from surface) state of the plate assembly. The passive and defensive conformations Available online 10 January 2012 exhibited differences in longitudinal curvature index (0.43 vs.
    [Show full text]
  • New Outlook on the System of Chitons (Mollusca: Polyplacophora)*
    VENUS 65 (1-2): 27-49, 2006 Review New Outlook on the System of Chitons (Mollusca: Polyplacophora)* Boris Sirenko Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab.1, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia; [email protected] Abstract: In order to build a natural classification of the chitons, a new approach is proposed that uses not only the shells, as usual, but also other suitable features including aesthetes, girdle, radula, gills, glands, egg hull projections, spermatozoids etc. Several previous classifications are discussed. A brief review of the evolution of the Polyplacophora is given and a new classification of the chitons is proposed. The roles of the articulamentum and the reductions in the tegmentum in chitons are discussed. The evolutionary line of the reduction of slits is shown for the superfamily Cryptoplacoidea. Specifically, the genera Hemiarthrum, Weedingia and Choriplax, which have unslitted valves, have been removed from the order Lepidopleurida and reassigned to the order Chitonida within the Cryptoplacoidea. Affinities of these and other genera within the Cryptoplacoidea are discussed. Keywords: Polyplacophora, taxonomy, evolution, articulamentum, reduction of tegmentum Introduction Creating classifications at its best is all about searching for phylogenetic affinities. The described natural system is a reflection of our ideas about affinities, expressed with the aid of a hierarchy of taxa. In the words of Darwin (1873): “...that Natural System is founded on descent with modification; - that the characters which naturalists consider as showing true affinity between any two or more species, are those which have been inherited from a common parents...all true classification being genealogical; - that community of descent is the hidden bond which naturalists have been unconsciously seeking...” For the early classifications of chitons, naturalists usually used a single or a few characters and their classifications were thus artificial.
    [Show full text]
  • Solenogastres, Caudofoveata, and Polyplacophora
    4 Solenogastres, Caudofoveata, and Polyplacophora Christiane Todt, Akiko Okusu, Christoffer Schander, and Enrico Schwabe SOLENOGASTRES The phylogenetic relationships among the molluscan classes have been debated for There are about 240 described species of decades, but there is now general agree- Solenogastres (Figure 4.1 A–C), but many more ment that the most basal extant groups are are likely to be found (Glaubrecht et al. 2005). the “aplacophoran” Solenogastres (ϭ Neo- These animals have a narrow, ciliated, gliding meniomorpha), the Caudofoveata (ϭ Chae- sole located in a ventral groove—the ventral todermomorpha) and the Polyplacophora. fold or foot—on which they crawl on hard or Nevertheless, these relatively small groups, soft substrates, or on the cnidarian colonies especially the mostly minute, inconspicuous, on which they feed (e.g., Salvini-Plawen 1967; and deep-water-dwelling Solenogastres and Scheltema and Jebb 1994; Okusu and Giribet Caudofoveata, are among the least known 2003). Anterior to the mouth is a unique sen- higher taxa within the Mollusca. sory region: the vestibulum or atrial sense Solenogastres and Caudofoveata are marine, organ. The foregut is a muscular tube and usu- worm-shaped animals. Their body is covered by ally bears a radula. Unlike other molluscs, the cuticle and aragonitic sclerites, which give them midgut of solenogasters is not divided in com- their characteristic shiny appearance. They have partments but unifi es the functions of a stom- been grouped together in the higher taxon Aplac- ach, midgut gland, and intestine (e.g., Todt and ophora (e.g., Hyman 1967; Scheltema 1988, Salvini-Plawen 2004b). The small posterior 1993, 1996; Ivanov 1996), but this grouping is pallial cavity lacks ctenidia.
    [Show full text]
  • Biogeography and Palaeogeography of the Sibumasu Terrane in the Ordovician: a Review
    Ordovician biogeography of Sibumasu 43 Biogeography and palaeogeography of the Sibumasu terrane in the Ordovician: a review R A Fortey and L R M Cocks Department of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK Key words: biogeography, palaeogeography, Sibumasu, Shan-Thai, Thailand, Burma, China, Aus- tralia, Ordovician, trilobites, brachiopods Abstract as on Figs1 and 2) terrane embraces much of the Malay peninsula, extending northwards into Following an extensive review of previous work, and a con- West Thailand and Burma and southwards into sideration of new faunas from Thailand, the integrity of the western Indonesia (Sumatra) It is bounded to Sibumasu palaeocontinent (Sumatra, Malaysia, West Thai- the east by the Uttaradit-Nan to Raub-Bentong land and Burma) in the early Palaeozoic is reinforced% Its lower Ordovician faunas have been claimed to show affinity sutures, and to the west by what Metcalfe (1992) with North China/Australia, but for the upper Ordovician, termed the Shan boundary (also possibly an an- we describe undoubted similarity to South China, both in cient suture) Thus it comprises a tract of land fossils and sedimentary facies% The possible resolution of some 4000 km long, clearly a continental entity these difficulties is discussed, and the provisional conclu- sions reached that (a) Sibumasu was most similar to South of sufficient size to have acquired its own palae- China; (b) South China and North China may not have been ogeographic signature Several major neigh- so far apart as has
    [Show full text]
  • 11 Mollusca Mollusca
    11 MOLLUSCA Horacio H. Camacho MOLLUSCA INTRODUCCIÓN podos, pelecípodos) hasta 30 m de largo (cefa- lópodos). Los moluscos constituyen un phylum nume- No obstante su diversidad (Figura 11. 1), com- roso y variado, habitantes de los ambientes parten características morfológicas, fisiológi- marinos, salobres, dulceacuícolas y terrestres; cas y embriológicas, además de relaciones filo- se los halla desde las grandes profundidades genéticas, que justifican el rango taxonómico oceánicas hasta en las zonas montañosas, a que se les ha adjudicado, si bien no es posible varios miles de metros sobre el nivel del mar. señalar un carácter que sea exhibido por la to- Después de los insectos son los invertebrados talidad de sus miembros. más numerosos, estimándose que en la actua- Los moluscos son metazoarios de simetría lidad, viven por lo menos 50000 especies pero, bilateral, disimulada en los gastrópodos por si se consideran los fósiles, podría esta canti- un fenómeno de torsión; el celoma es pequeño dad elevarse aproximadamente a 80000. y a diferencia de los anélidos carecen de seg- Los moluscos vivientes incluyen a organis- mentación, aunque en algunos se observa una mos bien reconocidos por el público en gene- repetición de órganos que determina una ral, como los caracoles, las almejas, las ostras, seudosegmentación o seudometamerismo. los pulpos y los calamares, cuyas dimensiones varían desde unos pocos milímetros (gastró- ANATOMÍA Característico del grupo es la posesión del manto o tejido epitelial, una extensión de la pared del cuerpo, que limita a la cavidad del manto o paleal donde se alojan las branquias. Dicha cavidad se halla en comunicación con el medio exterior permitiendo el oxigenamiento del aparato branquial (respiratorio), la llegada de partículas alimenticias y la descarga de los productos del metabolismo y la reproducción.
    [Show full text]