Excavations at Abingdon West Central Redevelopment: Iron Age, Roman, Medieval, and Post-Medieval Activity in Abingdon

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Excavations at Abingdon West Central Redevelopment: Iron Age, Roman, Medieval, and Post-Medieval Activity in Abingdon Excavations at Abingdon West Central Redevelopment: Iron Age, Roman, Medieval, and Post-medieval Activity in Abingdon Kate Brady, Alex Smith, and Granville Laws with contributions by Leigh Allen, Steve Allen, Edward Biddulph, Ceridwen Boston, Jon Cotter, Kate Cramp, Rose Grant, David Higgins, Lynne Keys, Quita Mould, Rebecca Nicholson, Andrew Norton, Lena Strid, Ruth Pelling, Ruth Shaffrey, Carole Wheeler, and Hugh Willmott SUMMARY Investigations to the south of Ock Street and to the west of West St Helen’s Street carried out by Oxford Archaeology in 2002–3 have revealed new evidence for the development of Abingdon from the Iron Age to the post-medieval period. The outer late Iron Age/early Roman settlement boundary ditch identified in previous investigations was traced through the site, and new evidence for a recut of this ditch was found. The remains of the medieval building that later became The Lamb Inn on the southern side of Ock Street were revealed and appear to have been occupied at some point by a leather worker and possibly a tanner. Tenements uncovered fronting West St Helen’s Street were also found to have been the site of small-scale industrial activity. Parts of a medieval building in the centre of the development area, discovered during an evaluation in 1996–7, were further exposed, including the discovery of a garderobe, strengthening evidence that it was the vicarage of St Helen’s rather than the Chapel of St Edmund as was once suggested. Clay-pipe manufacture appears to have occurred at the site of the Lamb Inn from the early seventeenth century, with the end of this industry coinciding with the end of the Ely occupancy of the Inn in the early eighteenth century. The excavations revealed evidence for the destruction of buildings during the English Civil War in the seventeenth century, and a small cemetery in the south of the development area may also belong to this period. etween November 2002 and December 2003 Oxford Archaeology carried out a series of Bevaluations, excavations, and watching briefs within the centre of Abingdon (NGR SU 4962 9702) in advance of a residential development by Lovell Partnerships Ltd. The development site was bounded by St Edmund’s Lane to the south and Ock Street and The Square to the north, and covered an area of approximately seven hectares (Fig. 1). The site lies on the first gravel terrace of the river Thames at a height of approximately 54 m ordnance datum (OD). It slopes down gently to the south towards the river Ock. BACKGROUND In 1996 and 1997 Oxford Archaeological Unit (now Oxford Archaeology) carried out a field evaluation in advance of the development of the present site. The results of this evaluation have been previously published elsewhere,1 but are particularly relevant to the discussion of this site and so are incorporated in some detail. The evaluation revealed several large defensive ditches from the late Iron Age/early Roman oppidum, in addition to what was almost certainly one of the ditches that marked the limit of the 1 T. G. Allen, ‘Abingdon: West Central Redevelopment Area’, SMidlA, 27 (1997), pp. 47–54. Published in Oxoniensia 2007, (c) Oxfordshire Architectural and Historical Society 108 KATE BRADY, ALEX SMITH, AND GRANVILLE LAWS Fig. 1. Site location Published in Oxoniensia 2007, (c) Oxfordshire Architectural and Historical Society ABINGDON WEST CENTRAL REDEVELOPMENT 109 Fig. 2. Overall plan of archaeological investigations, north of St Edmund’s Lane medieval town of Abingdon. A large medieval building was identified within the centre of the site, and a series of medieval and post-medieval pits were revealed further west. In the south of the site was a small cemetery, probably dating to the Civil War. Three areas beneath upstanding buildings were inaccessible during the 1996–7 evaluation. These were evaluated (post-demolition) in 2002 by machine trenching to determine their archaeological potential. The areas (Fig. 2) comprised the former Southern Electricity Board (SEB) building to the south-east of the site fronting West St Helen’s Street, the former Neave House to the west fronting Winsmore Lane, and the former Regal Cinema to the north of the site fronting Ock Street. In the light of the evaluation results, both the SEB and the Cinema site were subject to full area excavation, while the better preserved parts of the Neave House site were also excavated. A limited excavation was carried out in the previously defined area of the possible Civil War cemetery to the south of the site. The cemetery was carefully uncovered in order to define its extent and to record and extract the burials. An archaeological watching brief was maintained in the area towards the centre of the site and involved the observation of machine trenching for services, ground reduction for car parking, and the digging out of an area of Japanese knotweed. The 1996–7 evaluation had identified the area as being archaeologically sensitive, with the well-preserved structural remains of a medieval building, possibly a vicarage or remains associated with St Edmund’s chapel (thought to be sited nearby; see discussion below). Detailed excavation of this area was not required, due to the use of piled foundations, which have a limited impact on surviving archaeological remains. All of the work was undertaken in accordance with advice and a written brief issued by Hugh Coddingdon, Deputy County Archaeologist for Oxfordshire County Archaeological Services (OCAS), archaeological adviser to the Vale of White Horse District Council. A written scheme of investigation, prepared by OA, outlined proposals to mitigate the effect of the development on the surviving archaeological remains. Published in Oxoniensia 2007, (c) Oxfordshire Architectural and Historical Society 110 K AT E B R A D Y, ALEX SMITH, AND GRANVILLE L AW S ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT Prehistoric. The location of Abingdon at the confluence of the river Thames and the river Ock is likely to have been the most significant factor in the establishment of a substantial middle Iron Age settlement, a late Iron Age to early Romano-British oppidum or proto-town, and eventually a medieval abbey town. In the late Iron Age coin finds suggest that this water course was also utilized as a political boundary, forming the division between the lands of the Catuvellauni (to the east), the Atrebates (to the south), and the Dobunni (to the west). Lambrick outlines several broadly contemporary (c.100 BC–AD 4) major earthwork sites in the stretch of the Thames Valley either side of Abingdon that were also located on this natural and political boundary. Furthest north, the massive North Oxfordshire Grim’s Ditch (near Woodstock and Charlbury) enclosed an area that expanded from 1 sq. km to 80 sq. km. Romano-British villas were later situated within the boundary. Near Eynsham, the smaller Cassington Big Ring was situated on the banks of the Thames. The next site south-east along the Thames is the oppidum at Abingdon (the archaeological background of which is discussed below), while situated further south was Dyke Hills, Dorchester. This was very similar to the oppidum at Abingdon, perhaps with a similar function, but within a different tribal territory. Furthest south, near Wallingford, was the site of the South Oxfordshire Grim’s Ditch, a linear earthwork which at least partially enclosed a large loop in the Thames. The results of a long-running programme of archaeological work in Abingdon suggest that it has been occupied quite intensively since at least the early Iron Age, with earlier prehistoric activity indicated through finds of flint and pottery.4 The densely populated status of the settlement in the middle Iron Age was indicated by the discovery of more than a dozen house sites beneath the abbey house and its car park. Excavations at sites such as Abingdon Vineyard have shown that before the Roman period Abingdon was already a thriving riverside market centre. It was defined by two or three huge ditches to the north and west, and the river Thames to the south and east (Fig. 3). These ditches have been revealed in the north of the town and to the west in the 199– evaluations and the current excavations (see below).8 Romano-British. Early Roman Abingdon existed within the same boundary ditches as the Iron Age settlement (Fig. 3) and was densely occupied. It had an internal rectilinear layout and high- status finds, including fineware pottery. Three Roman masonry buildings have been identified in Abingdon, one in East St Helen’s Street,9 parts of one or more under the Railway Inn,10 and a third under Abbey House and gardens.11 By the early second century AD some of the defensive ditches had been deliberately backfilled as the town expanded over them.1 Roman ditches, pits, ovens, and graves have all been found, George Lambrick, ‘Frontier territory along the Thames’, British Archaeology, 33 (1998), pp. 1–1; Paul Booth et al., The Thames through Time: the Archaeology of the Gravel Terraces of the Upper and Middle Thames: the Early Historical period: AD 1–1000 (Oxford, 200), pp. 368–1. Ibid. 4 T. G. Allen, ‘Abingdon, Vineyard redevelopment’, SMidlA, 20 (1990), pp. 73–8. Ibid., n. 4; T. G. Allen, ‘Abingdon, Vineyard development’, SMidlA, 19 (1989), pp. 44–; idem, ‘An “oppidum” at Abingdon, Oxfordshire’, SMidlA, 21 (1991), pp. 9–9. Allen, ‘Abingdon, Vineyard redevelopment’, n. 4; idem, ‘The Vineyard, Abingdon’, unpublished client report (199). R. A. Chambers and J. Moore, ‘Abingdon: Vineyard redevelopment, archaeological assessment’, SMidlA, 18 (1988), p. ; T. G. Allen, ‘Abingdon, Abingdon Vineyard 199: areas 2 and 3, the early defences’, SMidlA, 23 (199), pp. 64– 8 Ibid., n.
Recommended publications
  • Ttu Mac001 000057.Pdf (19.52Mb)
    (Vlatthew flrnold. From the pn/ture in tlic Oriel Coll. Coniinon liooni, O.vford. Jhc Oxford poems 0[ attfiew ("Jk SAoUi: S'ips\i' ani "Jli\j«'vs.'') Illustrated, t© which are added w ith the storv of Ruskin's Roa(d makers. with Glides t© the Country the p©em5 iljystrate. Portrait, Ordnance Map, and 76 Photographs. by HENRY W. TAUNT, F.R.G.S. Photographer to the Oxford Architectural anid Historical Society. and Author of the well-knoi^rn Guides to the Thames. &c., 8cc. OXFORD: Henry W, Taunl ^ Co ALI. RIGHTS REStHVED. xji^i. TAONT & CO. ART PRINTERS. OXFORD The best of thanks is ren(iered by the Author to his many kind friends, -who by their information and assistance, have materially contributed to the successful completion of this little ^rork. To Mr. James Parker, -who has translated Edwi's Charter and besides has added notes of the greatest value, to Mr. Herbert Hurst for his details and additions and placing his collections in our hands; to Messrs Macmillan for the very courteous manner in which they smoothed the way for the use of Arnold's poems; to the Provost of Oriel Coll, for Arnold's portrait; to Mr. Madan of the Bodleian, for suggestions and notes, to the owners and occupiers of the various lands over which •we traversed to obtain some of the scenes; to the Vicar of New Hinksey for details, and to all who have helped with kindly advice, our best and many thanks are given. It is a pleasure when a ^ivork of this kind is being compiled to find so many kind friends ready to help.
    [Show full text]
  • Botley Character Statement West Way Community Concern
    Botley Character Statement West Way Community Concern 1 Contents A. Introduction to the Botley Character Statement C. Headline Findings D. Location, Context and Layout E. Historical Development F. Character Areas 1. West Way 2. Old Botley 3. Seacourt 4. Westminster Way 5. Arthray Road 6. Cumnor Rise 7. North of West Way 8. Dean Court G. Sources Appendix A. Methodology 2 Section A. Introduction to the Botley Character Statement Local residents and businesses in Botley have joined together to prepare this character statement as a result of concern that new development should respond positively to the area’s established positive character. Local and national planning policies require proposals for new development to take local character into account and respond positively to it in the design of new buildings and spaces and their use. However, defining what the positive features of local character are that should be sustained and what negative feature should be managed out through development is a fundamental stage in this design process and requires assessment, analysis and establishment of consensus. Character assessments are now being undertaken by various community groups, as well as local planning authorities to establish this consensus about what is valued in the character of local areas and neighbourhoods to inform planning for change. To support local communities in undertaking their own assessment of character a number of toolkits have been prepared with the assistance of CABE and English Heritage. These are a recognised means for community groups to prepare character assessments that are sufficiently robust and reliable to be informative for planning decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • January 2012
    Marcham & District News COTHILL – FrilFord – GarFord – Gozzards Ford – MarCHAM – TUBNEY Your Independent Local Newsheet – www.madnews.co.uk January 2012 Vol: 34 No: 1 READ & RECYCLE! FREE ► arthur anson outside the institute in the early 1900s see page 5 (image reproduced by kind permission of Maurice Shepherd) ▲ ► Starting young! a model and plan for a village hall at MCG's Family Event see page 9 ► Santa visiting the toddler group at their Christmas party Holiday WaStE CollECtioNS Please ensure your rubbish bags aren’t left vulnerable to animal and/or bird attack. * Please note on these days collections will start from 6am, an hour earlier than usual, so remember to put your bins out the night before. ▲ Pre School with Normal day Revised day Which bin? giant land snail 'horns' Friday 30 December Tuesday 3 January Grey see page 13 Monday 2 January Wednesday 4 January Green ◄ Mary and Joseph in the stable by Emily Tuesday 3 January Thursday 5 January Green Wednesday 4 January Friday 6 January Green Thursday 5 January Saturday 7 January * Green Friday 6 January Monday 9 January Green Monday 9 January Tuesday 10 January Grey Tuesday 10 January Wednesday 11 January Grey Wednesday 11 January Thursday 12 January Grey Thursday 12 January Friday 13 January Grey Friday 13 January Saturday 14 January * Grey DIARY FOR JANUARY 10 Tue Marcham Society, All Saints’ Church, 19.45 11 20 Fri Deadline for all submissions for February 10 Tue Singing at 62 North Street, 14.00 – 15.30 11 issue of MADNews 11 Wed Marcham Parish Council Meeting, Duffield 3 20
    [Show full text]
  • Cumnor Hill & Side Roads
    CMDE13 Division(s): North Hinksey CABINET MEMBER FOR ENVIRONMENT – 16 JULY 2020 CUMNOR - CUMNOR HILL & SIDE ROADS: PROPOSED 30MPH SPEED LIMIT Report by Interim Director of Community Operations Recommendation 1. The Cabinet Member for the Environment is RECOMMENDED to approve the proposed 30mph speed limits as advertised. Executive summary 2. Speed limits are reviewed when there are changes to the road layout or usage as a result of development and when requested by the local member, local councils or other parties due to concerns over road safety. Introduction 3. This report presents responses received to a statutory consultation to introduce a 30mph speed limit on Cumnor Hill in place of the existing 40mph speed limit and also a 30mph speed limit on the Kimmeridge Road residential development. Background 4. The above proposals as shown at Annex 1 have been requested by Cumnor Parish Council and, if approved, would be funded from s106 contributions received from developers, the Area Parish Support budget and Cumnor Parish Council. Three speed surveys (funded by Cumnor Parish Council) were carried out to confirm that existing traffic speeds were compatible with a 30mph speed limit without additional supporting traffic calming measures. Consultation 5. Formal consultation was carried out between 4 June and 3 July 2020. A notice was published in the Oxford Times newspaper and an email sent to statutory consultees, including Thames Valley Police, the Fire & Rescue Service, Ambulance service, the Vale of White Horse District Council, Cumnor Parish Council and local County Councillor. 6. 358 responses were received. 332 in support (93%), 16 objections (4%), 9 raising concerns and one non-objection.
    [Show full text]
  • River Thames (Eynsham to Benson) and Ock
    NRA Thames 254 National Rivers Authority Thames Region TR44 River Thames (Eynsham to Benson) and Ock Catchment Review October 1994 NRA Thames Region Document for INTERNAL CIRCULATION only National River Authority Thames Region Catchment Planning - West River Thames (Eynsham to Benson) and Ock Catchment Review October 1994 River Thames (Eynsham to Benson) and Ock - Catchment Review CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION 2. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE WATER ENVIRONMENT Overview 2 Geology and Topography 2 Hydrology 2 Water Resources 5 Water Quality 9 Pollution Control 14 Consented Discharges 15 * Flood Defence 18 Fisheries 18 Conservation 19 Landscape 21 Recreation 23 Navigation 26 Land Use Planning Context 29 Minerals 31 P2J73/ i River Thames (Eynsham to Benson) and Ock - Catchment Review Page 3. CATCHMENT ISSUES 34 South West Oxfordshire Reservoir Proposal 34 Ground water Pollution 35 River Levels & Flows 35 Habitat Degradation 35 Wolvercote Pit 36 Eutrophication of the Thames 36 River Thames : Seacourt Stream Relationship 36 The River Thames Through Oxford 37 Oxford Structures Study 37 Oxford Sewage Treatment Works 37 Kidlington Sewage Treatment Works 38 Oxford Sewers 38 Development Pressure 38 Navigation Issues 39 Landscape Issues 39 Recreation Issues 39 Wiltshire Berkshire Canal 40 Summary of Key Issues 41 4. CATCHMENT ACTIONS 43 5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 51 P2573/ i i River Thames (Eynsham to Benson) and Ock - Catchment Review LIST OF TABLES Page 2.1 Details of Licensed Ground/Surface Water Abstractions of Greater than lML/day 9 2.2 RQOs,
    [Show full text]
  • For Richer for Poorer – Poverty and Livelihoods In
    FOR RICHER, FOR POORER POVERTY AND LIVELIHOODS IN THE DIOCESE OF OXFORD JANE PERRY EDITED BY ALISON WEBSTER i We welcome this excellent report ‘For Richer For Poorer’ as it builds significantly on our own ‘Vital Signs’ and ‘Uncovered’ publications which set out our aspirations for pooling our resources, focusing our collective efforts and working in partnership to strengthen our communities. We would be delighted to explore how we might build on the many great local projects that are happening within parishes across the Diocese. We believe there are increasing opportunities for us all to combine our efforts and work more closely together. Jayne Woodley, Chief Executive, Oxfordshire Community Foundation, on behalf of Community Foundations across the Thames Valley. ii CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1 2. Introducing the Diocese of Oxford 7 2.1. Types of Households 15 2.2. Ethnic Diversity 18 2.3. Other Faith Groups 22 2.4. Age Profile 24 3. What Do We Mean By ‘Poverty’? 29 3.1. Income Poverty 35 4. Dimensions of Deprivation 41 4.1. Overall Index of Multiple Deprivation 46 4.2. Income 48 4.3. Employment 50 4.4. Health Deprivation and Disability 53 4.5. Living Environment 56 4.6. Education, Skills and Training 58 4.7. Crime 60 4.8. Barriers to Housing and Services 62 5. Conclusions 69 iii iv LIST OF MAPS Map 1 Diocese of Oxford – Main Settlements and Features 8 Map 2 Local Authority Districts 9 Map 3 Deaneries and Archdeaconries 12 Map 4 Rural-Urban (National Statistics: Census 2011) 14 Map 5 Predominant MOSAIC Household Type (Experian: MOSAIC,
    [Show full text]
  • Oxford Open Doors 2020 Programme All VIRTUAL Events Going Live at 10Am on Saturday 12Th September Until 6Pm on Sunday 13Th September
    Oxford Open Doors 2020 Programme All VIRTUAL events going live at 10am on Saturday 12th September until 6pm on Sunday 13th September OPT Virtual Talks – Recent Archaeological Work & Oxford’s Hated Buildings The Painted Room – Virtual Tour LMS Railway Swingbridge – Videos Oxford Castle & Prison – Videos The Covered Market – Malcolm Graham’s History & Stuart Panter’s Videos Sandford Hydro – Virtual Tour 66 Men of Grandpont – Film, Trail & Website University of Oxford – Department Virtual Tours Balliol College – Virtual Exhibition Exeter College & Cohen Quad – Virtual Tours Trinity College – Virtual Tour The Mitre, Lincoln College – Restoration Video St Clare's, Oxford – Short Film Bodleian Libraries – Explore the Collections Sheldonian Theatre – Virtual Tour Examination Schools – Event Time-Lapse St Luke’s Chapel – Virtual Tour Museum of Oxford (Oxford Town Hall) – Virtual Tour & Short Films Pitt Rivers Museum – Virtual Museum & Virtual Talk Museum of Natural History – Virtual Museum & Architecture of a Museum Video History of Science Museum – Virtual Museum Modern Art Oxford – Online Exhibition St Michael at the North Gate – Video Wytham Woods – The Laboratory with Leaves Trap Grounds – Introductory Video HealthFest Virtual Event – Oxford Health Charity Festival Wesley Memorial Church – Oral Histories Oxford Jewish Congregation – Video & Information Leaflets OCC Emergency Planning Unit – Virtual Talk Dorchester on Thames – Short Documentaries Stanford University Centre – Virtual Tour Plus, the 2018 Pavlova Wind Quintet Concert at 4pm on
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the Oxford View Cones
    Assessment of the Oxford View Cones 2015 Report oxford preservation trust Assessment of the Oxford View Cones Views From the Western Hills: Raleigh Park 2 ii Assessment of the Oxford View Cones 2015 Report View Cones foreword Oxford is a rare City. It features an architectural how the views of Oxford’s ‘dreaming spires’ history that spans nearly 1000 years, with contributes to our understanding and enjoyment set pieces designed by some of the best of the City’s cultural richness. This is as an architects, past and present. These are evident evidence base to help all those with a role in at the City’s core in its townscape and skyline. helping to sustain the City’s history and future. The location on a raised gravel bed allows Oxford’s skyline of domes, spires and towers The study has been made possible through the to be enjoyed in views from the surrounding collaboration and support of Historic England villages and hills of the Thames valley, since and Oxford Preservation Trust and has involved the suburbs are mostly concealed within the local groups, individuals and businesses with lower lying topography and green landscape of an intimate knowledge and understanding of the valley. Oxford and its history. Oxford is a City of contrasts. It has an Our thanks in particular to those who have international reputation through two contributed; universities, the Oxford colleges, medical and scientific research, the motor industry and a Historic England – Dr Kathryn Davies remarkable cultural diversity. It features in the collective memory, both past and present, of Oxford Preservation Trust – Debbie Dance, the many who have studied or worked here or Jacquie Martinez, Eleanor Cooper just come to enjoy the history and its culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transport in Oxfordshire
    269 Public Transpor t in Oxfordshir e to Daventry to Southam Stratford-upon-Avo n Wellesbourne A C KEY Gaydon 66 270 B 503 Byfield Oxfor dshir e bus ser vices 269 O 200 277 xf Woodford 270 277 ord Hourly or better service, Mon-Fri 50 0 498 C Halse Loxley Northend an Fenny al 37 Temple Compton Less than hourl y, Mon-Fri I C K S M H Herdewyke 4 200 W H 0 Canons Less than daily 50 3 R Kineton II M 503 o Ashby A R t o Avon W r W E w Eydon Town services B1 a Dassett Claydon 270 y 269 Farnborough well Moreton Motorway 270 66 Chipping her 277 r C Pinkney Other road 1 Ettington Warden ve 503 Ri Alderminster 498 Railway line and station Warmington 277 N with more than hourly service 270 Mollington 50 Pillerton Railway line and station Ratley Cropredy Culworth Weston O 1 with less than hourly service A Priors Wardington Weedon 50 66 200 508 Lois R County boundary Newbold-on-Stour Hornton Shotteswell Oxhill Sulgrave T Long distance footpaths Great Williamscot T 498 Bourton 503 H 504 Thorpe H 269 508 498 Little Chacombe Mandeville Tredington Upper Tysoe Horley Bourton 500 8 A Hanwell 50 Helmdon A Places of inter est/public buildings Shenington 66 to Silverstone Marston 277 MM Tourist Information Centre St. Lawrence Greatworth D Alkerton Wroxton Drayton 503 132.508.T2A Syresham Museum Balscote 269 Overthorpe PP 1 270 Middleton 508 Castl e Shipston- Epwell 269 Cheney Halse 8 TT on-Stour North Ancient monument Newington Banbu ry A OO Upper Lower 50 Shutford Town Services: Farthinghoe Brailes 81 Whitfield Zoo/Wildlife park Brailes 269 B1.B2.B5 0 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Xfordshire Are Great A44 A34 Places to Spend a Day
    Thames Travel Services 2019 June 250 to Bicester 11 Oxford - Garsington - Chalgrove - Watlington (up to every hour Monday-Saturday) Oxford Road Here, there & 94 Didcot - East Hagbourne - Blewbury (up to every hour Monday-Friday) Kidlington 136 Cholsey - Wallingford - Benson - RAF Benson (up to every 30 minutes Monday-Friday, up to every hour Saturday) 143 Reading - Purley - Pangbourne - Upper Basildon - Goring (up to every 2 hours Monday-Saturday) Woodstock everywhere 2C 2D Oxford 250 Oxford - Bletchingdon - Kirtlington - Upper Heyford - Bicester (up to every hour Monday-Saturday) 500 Airport 2 ST1 Oxford - Harwell Campus (up to every 30 minutes Monday-Friday) 2B connector X2 Oxford - Abingdon - Didcot - Wallingford (up to every 30 minutes daily) for just £8 2A connector X32 Oxford - Didcot - Wantage (up to every hour daily) connector 33/X33 Abingdon - Didcot - Harwell Campus - Wantage (up to every hour Monday-Saturday, no 33 service on Saturdays) Blenheim Palace 2C With a rich heritage, hundreds of world-class historical connector 38 Wantage - Grove (up to every hour Monday-Saturday) buildings and loads of fantastic family and social connector 67 Wantage - Faringdon (up to every hour Monday-Saturday) attractions, Oxford and South Oxfordshire are great A44 A34 places to spend a day. connector 97 Didcot - Great Western Park (South) (up to every hour Monday-Friday) connector 98 Didcot - Great Western Park - Harwell Campus (up to every 15 minutes Monday-Saturday, up to every 30 minutes Sunday) From Oxford’s picturesque architecture to the Peartree connector 99 Great Western Park - Milton Park(up to every 30 minutes Monday-Friday) stylish Oracle shopping centre in Reading, your Park&Ride Oxford Parkway River Rapids X38 Oxford - Wallingford - Henley - Reading (up to every hour Monday-Saturday) Go-Anywhere day ticket will get you there.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxfordshire Archdeacon's Marriage Bond Index
    Oxfordshire Archdeacon’s Marriage Bond Index - 1634 - 1849 Alphabetized by Bride’s names Year Groom Parish Bride Parish 1686 Douglas, Wm Cromersh Gifford Wid --- Cromersh Gifford Wid 1721 Mumford, Geo Middleton Stoney --- --- 1727 Sadgrove, Wm --- --- --- 1737 Vernine, Wm Pepper --- --- 1737 Giles, Richd Islip --- --- 1738 Evans, Wm Thame --- Chinner 1739 Bolton, Wm Steeple Aston --- --- 1739 Clanfield, Henry Fifield Widr --- Culham 1739 Agar, James Charlbury --- Charlbury Wid 1739 Wells, John Oxford --- --- 1742 Groves, James Shotover Widr --- --- 1742 Buttler, John Drayton --- --- 1746 Lee, John Dunstew --- --- 1747 Blackman, Thos Oxford --- --- 1749 Milner, Henry Bletchingdon --- --- 1761 Colcutt, James Hook Norton --- --- 1761 Enock, Wm Sibford Gower --- --- 1730 Goody, Richd Newnham Murren (blank), Anne --- 1674 Everton, Wm. Burcester widr Abbot, Mary Burcester wid 1634 Kendall, John Bicester Abbott, Alice New Woodstock 1812 Moore, Jas Oxford Abbott, Joan Oxford 1705 Keat, Fras Oxford widr Abbott, Mary Oxford 1789 Bunce, Richd Tilehurst, Bks Abbott, Mary Caversham 1791 Rogers, John Oxford Abear, Sar Oxford 1708 Hastings, Edwd Shipton Abel, Hester Witney 1733 Arndell, Simon Witney Abell, Elizth Witney 1726 Marriott, Thos Witney Abell, Mary Witney 1796 Amos, Thos Arncot Abraham, Ann Arncot Oxfordshire Archdeacon’s Marriage Bond Index - 1634 - 1849 Alphabetized by Bride’s names Year Groom Parish Bride Parish 1768 Cannon, Thos Oxford Abraham, Eleanor Oxford Wid 1719 Atterton, John Burcester Abraham, Elizth Blackthorne 1729 Priest, Joseph Charlton Widr Abraham, Grace Blackthorn 1664 Redhead, William Cowley Absalom, Anne Cowley 1830 Cox, Solomon Oxford Absalum, Elizth Oxford 1690 Brooks, Ricd Marston widr Absolom, Edith Heddington wid 1757 Jones, Benjn Oxford Absolom, Hannah Wallingford, Bks 1699 Godfrey, Henry Heddington Absolom, Mary Heddington 1717 Stuart, Jas Oxford Absworth, Elizth Oxford wid 1749 Alley, Edmd Islip Acerman, Ann Oxford 1691 Carpenter, Job Oxford widr Acey, Cathe Oxford 1683 Dorman, Dan.
    [Show full text]
  • The Medieval Rural Landscape, C AD 1000–1500 by James Bond
    THE THAMES THROUGH TIME The Archaeology of the Gravel Terraces of the Upper and Middle Thames: The Thames Valley in the Medieval and Post-Medieval Periods AD 1000–2000 The Medieval Rural Landscape AD 1000–1500 THE THAMES THROUGH TIME The Archaeology of the Gravel Terraces of the Upper and Middle Thames: The Thames Valley in the Medieval and Post-Medieval Periods AD 1000-2000 The medieval rural landscape, c AD 1000–1500 by James Bond INTRODUCTION The study of the medieval rural landscape entails a long history of research. The late 19th and early 20th century saw several pioneering works by historians who aimed to shift the spotlight from matters of political and religious history towards a better understanding of the countryside (eg Seebohm 1883; Vinogradoff 1892; Maitland 1897). The work of Gray (1915) built on these early studies by emphasising the considerable evidence of regional variation in landscape character. By the 1950s, interest in the medieval rural landscape, and particularly of the medieval village, was accelerating, with research by Beresford (1954) and W G Hoskins (1955) amongst the most prominent. The emerging knowledge base was now becoming founded on archaeological research and this was increasingly complemented by architectural (eg Long 1938–1941; Faulkner 1958; Currie 1992) and place/field-name studies (Gelling 1954; 1976; Bond 1982; Faith 1998) which added further detail and context to understanding of medieval settlements. Broader appreciation of the wider landscape, in terms of how it was used, organised and perceived by its medieval inhabitants have also been examined from the perspective of the elite (eg Creighton 2009; Langton 2010) and increasingly from the point of view of the peasant (eg Faith 1997; Dyer 2014).
    [Show full text]