AFILIADOSFILIADOS Aa Loslos PARTIDOSPARTIDOS POLPOLÍÍTICOSTICOS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

AFILIADOSFILIADOS Aa Loslos PARTIDOSPARTIDOS POLPOLÍÍTICOSTICOS AAFILIADOSFILIADOS aa loslos PARTIDOSPARTIDOS POLPOLÍÍTICOSTICOS ESTADESTADÍÍSTICASTICA --PrimerPrimer SemestreSemestre 20102010-- CÁMARA NACIONAL ELECTORAL Registro Nacional de Afiliados a los Partidos Políticos Inicio ESTADESTADÍÍSTICASTICA AfiliadosAfiliados aa loslos PartidosPartidos PolPolííticosticos PrimerPrimer SemestreSemestre 20102010 z DATOS GENERALES z PARTIDOS NACIONALES z PARTIDOS DE DISTRITO NOTA: En este informe se incluyen partidos con sentencia de caducidad apelada ante la Cámara Nacional Electoral con fecha anterior al cierre del primer semestre (30/06/10), algunos de los cuales tienen sentencia de caducidad confirmada con fecha posterior. Se informa la situación de esos partidos, al final de la presentación. Volver DATOSDATOS GENERALESGENERALES z Partidos Políticos z Conformación del electorado z Distribución de afiliados (a partidos de distrito según integren o no nacionales) z Mayor y menor cantidad de afiliados Volver PARTIDOSPARTIDOS POLPOLÍÍTICOSTICOS -- TotalesTotales alal 30/06/1030/06/10 -- PARTIDOS POLÍTICOS 708 PARTIDOS NACIONALES PARTIDOS DE DISTRITO 33 675 integran partidos nacionales no integran partidos nacionales 372 303 Volver CONFORMACICONFORMACIÓÓNN DELDEL ELECTORADOELECTORADO AFILIADOS NO AFILIADOS ELECTORES Mujeres 4.400.212 10.057.042 14.457.254 Varones 4.079.584 9.731.770 13.811.354 Totales 8.479.796 19.788.812 28.268.608 Porcentajes 30,00% 70,00% 100% Gráfico Volver CONFORMACICONFORMACIÓÓNN DELDEL ELECTORADOELECTORADO Total del electores: 28.268.608 AFILIADOS 8.479.796 (30,00%) NO AFILIADOS 19.788.812 (70,00%) Volver DISTRIBUCIDISTRIBUCIÓÓNN DEDE AFILIADOSAFILIADOS a partidos de distrito a partidos de distrito no AFILIADOS integrantes de partidos integrantes de partidos nacionales nacionales Mujeres 3.812.457 587.755 Varones 3.515.761 563.823 Totales 7.328.218 1.151.578 Porcentajes 86,42% 13,58% Gráficos Volver DISTRIBUCIDISTRIBUCIÓÓNN DEDE AFILIADOSAFILIADOS Total del país: 8.479.796 Afiliados a partidos de distrito no integrantes de partidos nacionales 1.151.578 (13,58%) Afiliados a partidos de distrito integrantes de partidos nacionales 7.328.218 (86,42%) Siguiente Volver DISTRIBUCIÓN DE AFILIADOS Y NO AFILIADOS Total de electores: 28.268.608 AFILIADOS a partidos de distrito integrantes de partidos nacionales 7.328.218 (25,93%) AFILIADOS No afiliados a partidos de distrito no integrantes 19.788.812 de partidos nacionales (70,00%) 1.151.578 (4,07%) Volver 75 70 65 60 INTEGRAN ORDEN NACIONAL: 372 55 PARTIDOS POL 50 45 39 40 35 30 33 25 20 15 Í 10 TICOS DE DISTRITO 31 Total: 675 5 11 0 30 BUENOS AIRES 12 24 21 CAPITAL FEDERAL 15 CATAMARCA NO INTEGRAN ORDEN NACIONAL: 303 4 CHACO 23 8 5 CHUBUT 17 10 19 CORRIENTES 11 11 15 16 FORMOSA 5 8 12 JUJUY 9 13 LA PAMPA 12 15 LA RIOJA 9 MENDOZA 13 13 MISIONES 4 9 11 12 13 11 17 SALTA 12 15 SAN JUAN 17 3 SAN LUIS 7 21 SANTA CRUZ 18 12 SANTA FE 7 SANTIAGO DEL ESTERO 8 TIERRA DEL FUEGO 14 Volver MAYOR Y MENOR CANTIDAD DE AFILIADOS Con relación al total del país: 8.479.796 PARTIDOS DE ORDEN NACIONAL Total de % CON MAYOR CANTIDAD afiliados Partido Justicialista N° 2 3.780.651 44,58 Unión Cívica Radical N° 3 2.348.384 27,69 Partido Frente Grande N° 41 169.353 2,00 Partido Socialista N° 50 125.194 1,48 Pro – Propuesta Republicana N° 64 94.730 1,12 Total de % CON MENOR CANTIDAD afiliados Movimiento por la Dignidad y la Independencia N° 37 4.168 0,05 Es Posible N° 63 9.420 0,11 Partido Popular de la Reconstrucción N° 51 9.542 0,11 Partido Unión y Libertad N° 52 10.053 0,12 Movimiento de Acción Vecinal N° 57 13.181 0,16 Siguiente Volver MAYOR Y MENOR CANTIDAD DE AFILIADOS Con relación al total del país: 8.479.796 DISTRITOS ELECTORALES Total de CON MAYOR CANTIDAD afiliados % Buenos Aires 2.790.542 32,91 Córdoba 711.775 8,39 Santa Fe 679.086 8,01 Capital Federal 490.321 5,78 Tucumán 385.597 4,55 Total de CON MENOR CANTIDAD afiliados % Tierra del Fuego 33.241 0,39 Santa Cruz 47.059 0,55 La Pampa 77.858 0,92 Chubut 81.802 0,96 La Rioja 84.609 1,00 Volver PARTIDOSPARTIDOS NACIONALESNACIONALES z Totales generales y porcentajes z Afiliados por partido nacional z 4‰ de electores afiliados por distrito Volver Totales generales y porcentajes % con relación al total de % con afiliados a relación % con TOTAL DE partidos de al total relación al PARTIDO NACIONAL distrito de total de AFILIADOS integrantes de partidos afiliados electores del pais nacionales ACCIÓN POR LA REPÚBLICA (AR) N° 44 39.764 0,54% 0,47% 0,14% COALICIÓN CÍVICA - AFIRMACIÓN PARA UNA REPÚBLICA IGUALITARIA (ARI) N° 47 51.282 0,70% 0,60% 0,18% ES POSIBLE Nº 63 9.420 0,13% 0,11% 0,03% IZQUIERDA SOCIALISTA Nº 61 17.399 0,24% 0,21% 0,06% MOVIMIENTO DE ACCIÓN VECINAL Nº 57 13.181 0,18% 0,16% 0,05% MOVIMIENTO DE INTEGRACIÓN Y DESARROLLO (MID) N° 1 48.318 0,66% 0,57% 0,17% MOVIMIENTO INDEPENDIENTE DE JUBILADOS Y DESOCUPADOS (MIJD) Nº 60 23.573 0,32% 0,28% 0,08% MOVIMIENTO LIBRES DEL SUR N° 40 29.634 0,40% 0,35% 0,10% MOVIMIENTO POR LA DIGNIDAD Y LA INDEPENDENCIA (MODIN) N° 37 4.168 0,06% 0,05% 0,01% MOVIMIENTO SOCIALISTA DE LOS TRABAJADORES (MST) N° 38 30.437 0,42% 0,36% 0,11% PARTIDO AUTONOMISTA N° 36 40.003 0,55% 0,47% 0,14% PARTIDO COMUNISTA N° 12 30.750 0,42% 0,36% 0,11% PARTIDO CONSERVADOR POPULAR (PCP) N° 19 22.775 0,31% 0,27% 0,08% PARTIDO DE LA VICTORIA N° 54 44.397 0,61% 0,52% 0,16% PARTIDO DE LOS TRABAJADORES SOCIALISTAS (PTS) N° 45 20.929 0,29% 0,25% 0,07% PARTIDO DEMÓCRATA CRISTIANO (PDC) N° 5 48.637 0,66% 0,57% 0,17% Siguiente Volver % con relación al % con total de afiliados % con de partidos de relación al PARTIDO NACIONAL TOTAL DE distrito total de relación al AFILIADOS integrantes de total de partidos afiliados electores nacionales del país PARTIDO DEMÓCRATA PROGRESISTA (PDP ) N° 9 33.646 0,46% 0,40% 0,12% PARTIDO FEDERAL (PF) N° 8 20.895 0,29% 0,25% 0,07% PARTIDO FRENTE GRANDE N° 41 169.353 2,31% 2,00% 0,60% PARTIDO HUMANISTA (PH) N° 22 33.027 0,45% 0,39% 0,12% PARTIDO INTRANSIGENTE (PI) N° 6 54.593 0,74% 0,64% 0,19% PARTIDO JUSTICIALISTA (PJ) N° 2 3.780.651 51,59% 44,58% 13,37% PARTIDO NACIONALISTA CONSTITUCIONAL UNIR (UNIR) N° 33 24.915 0,34% 0,29% 0,09% PARTIDO OBRERO (PO) N° 14 22.615 0,31% 0,27% 0,08% PARTIDO POPULAR DE LA RECONSTRUCCIÓN (PPR) N° 51 9.542 0,13% 0,11% 0,03% PARTIDO SOCIALISTA (PS) N° 50 125.194 1,71% 1,48% 0,44% PARTIDO SOCIALISTA AUTÉNTICO (PSA) N° 30 13.747 0,19% 0,16% 0,05% PARTIDO UNIÓN Y LIBERTAD (PUL) N° 52 10.053 0,14% 0,12% 0,04% POLÍTICA ABIERTA PARA LA INTEGRIDAD SOCIAL (PAIS) N° 42 21.162 0,29% 0,25% 0,07% PRO - PROPUESTA REPUBLICANA N° 64 94.730 1,29% 1,12% 0,34% UNIÓN CÍVICA RADICAL (UCR) N° 3 2.348.384 32,05% 27,69% 8,31% UNIÓN DEL CENTRO DEMOCRÁTICO (UCeDe) N° 20 73.234 1,00% 0,86% 0,26% UNIÓN POPULAR N° 23 17.810 0,24% 0,21% 0,06% TOTAL: 7.328.218 100% 86,42% 25,93% Gráfico Anterior AFILIADOSAFILIADOS AA LOSLOS PARTIDOSPARTIDOS POLPOLÍÍTICOSTICOS -- OrdenOrden nacionalnacional –– Total:Total: 7.328.2187.328.218 Partido Justicialista (PJ) N° 2 60,00% Unión Cívica Radical (UCR) N° 3 51,59% Partido Frente Grande N° 41 50,00% Partido Socialista (PS) N° 50 Pro - Propuesta Republicana N° 64 40,00% Unión del Centro Democrático (UCeDe) N° 20 32,05% Partido Intransigente (PI) N° 6 30,00% Coalición Cívica - Afirmación para una República Igualitaria (ARI) N° 47 Partido Demócrata Cristiano (PDC) N° 5 20,00% Movimiento de Integración y Desarrollo (MID) N° 1 Partido de la Victoria N° 54 10,00% 5,59% 2,31% Partido Autonomista N° 36 1,29% 0,74% 0,66% 0,61% 0,54% Acción por la República (AR) N° 44 0,00% 1,71% 1,00% 0,70% 0,66% 0,55% Partidos Nacionales con menos del 0,50% (total 20) Volver PARTIDOS NACIONALES - 4‰ de electores afiliados por distrito Partidos Nacionales: 33 N° 1 N° 2 N° 3 N° 5 N° 6 N° 8 N° 9 N° 12 N° 14 N° 19 N° 20 4‰ de MID DISTRITOS electores PJ UCR PDC PI PF PDP PC PO PCP UCD BUENOS AIRES 4.000 16.846 1.464.750 760.791 20.600 30.242 7.004 5.532 4.483 3.724 10.715 23.099 CAPITAL FEDERAL 4.000 3.355 116.164 151350 4.988 5.490 2.478 4.004 2.953 3.996 17.128 CATAMARCA 1.010 212 50.966 55.766 1.602 1.054 79 1.005 253 CHACO 2.899 154.252 107.764 1.038 751 284 1.605 CHUBUT 1.388 34.878 36.512 409 CÓRDOBA 4.000 4.145 234.685 280.924 4.001 3.816 3.933 4.214 22.301 CORRIENTES 2.745 2.760 85.494 92.688 2.816 3.215 2.719 1.090 1.611 3.102 ENTRE RÍOS 3.620 157.666 72.560 1.553 497 FORMOSA 1.428 3.454 120.916 35.256 422 1.557 1.404 1.067 JUJUY 1.714 265 131.077 39.620 421 896 904 1.348 646 LA PAMPA 982 755 55.510 13.472 215 LA RIOJA 889 51.943 15.054 221 220 791 MENDOZA 4.000 81.403 121.519 3.033 4.440 3.842 MISIONES 2.853 3.011 85.662 61.592 634 369 319 1.352 NEUQUÉN 1.582 351 24.015 11.571 253 284 1.071 RÍO NEGRO 1.699 655 38.270 49.574 1.296 561 188 228 1.792 SALTA 3.174 704 135.761 44.519 2.321 2.422 SAN JUAN 1.838 1.894 53.014 25.423 641 686 442 1.654 3.073 SAN LUIS 1.199 1.232 44.709 28.924 436 339 1.198 SANTA CRUZ 757 29.839 12.248 SANTA FE 4.000 6.667 289.409 222.353 3.180 4.099 19.799 4.155 3.193 2.922 5.999 SGO.
Recommended publications
  • South America List of Political Parties
    Manifesto Project Dataset: South America List of Political Parties [email protected] Website: https://manifesto-project.wzb.eu/ Version 2018b from December 7, 2018 Manifesto Project Dataset: South America - List of Political Parties Version 2018b 1 Coverage of the Dataset including Party Splits and Merges The Manifesto Data Collection: South America covers parliamentary and presidential elections in South America. The following list documents all the parties, candidates and elections contained in the dataset. The list includes the name of the party or (candidate) alliance in the original language and in English, the party/alliance abbreviation, the name of the presidential candidate (if this applies) as well as the corresponding party identification number. In the case of an alliance, it also documents the member parties it comprises. Within the list of alliance members, parties are represented only by their id and abbreviation if they are also part of the general party list. If the composition of an alliance has changed between elections this change is reported as well. If parliamentary and presidential elections occur at roughly the same time (not necessarily on the same date but within a time frame of one or two months) parties and candidates usually run on the same manifesto. In these cases we report the party/alliance that backed a candidate and the candidate’s name. The same information is provided for presidential elections. If a parliamentary election occurred independently from a presidential election we only report parties and alliances but no candidates. Furthermore, the list records renames of parties and alliances. It shows whether a party has split from another party or a number of parties has merged and indicates the name (and the party id if it exists) of this split or merger parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Las Características Personales De Los Legisladores Argentinos: Un Estudio Exploratorio
    Universidad de San Andrés Departamento de Ciencias Sociales Licenciatura en Ciencia Política Las características personales de los legisladores argentinos: un estudio exploratorio Autor: Martín E. De Simone Legajo: 21077 Mentor: Mariano Tommasi Victoria, Mayo de 2013 Agradecimientos A mi mentor, Mariano Tommasi, por su ayuda y consejos. A María Barón, Directora de la Fundación Directorio Legislativo, por sus valiosos comentarios. A mi novia, Luciana Ramírez, por su incondicional apoyo y eterno aguante. A aquellos profesores que me marcaron durante la carrera. A quienes en mi familia nunca dejaron de confiar en mí. A los miembros de las Oficinas de Admisión, Orientación al Alumno y Asistencia Financiera por su constante respaldo. A Fernando Cafferata y Natalia dos Santos Claro, por su comprensión y apoyo. Finalmente, a mi mamá y a mi papá, que desde el cielo me han dado fuerzas a lo largo de todos estos años. 2 ÍNDICE Abreviaturas y Acrónimos……………………………………………………………………………4 Introducción…………………………………………………………………………………………...6 Justificación del Tema de Investigación…………………………………………………..6 Capítulo I: Estado de la Cuestión………………………………………………………………….10 Un primer acercamiento…………………………………………………………………...10 Estudios sobre el perfil de los legisladores……………………………………………...12 Carencias de la Literatura…………………………………………………………………18 Capítulo II: Enfoque Teórico y Metodológico…………………………………………………….21 Marco Teórico………………………………………………………………………………21 Marco Metodológico………………………………………………………………………..23 La selección de los legisladores argentinos……………………………………………..24
    [Show full text]
  • Presidents Versus Federalism in the National Legislative Process
    Presidents versus Federalism in the National Legislative Process The Argentine Senate in Comparative Perspective Hirokazu Kikuchi IDE-JETRO Series Te Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization (IDE-JETRO) series explores the economic issues faced in developing regions globally, providing new research and analysis of these economies, with the aim of creating a more comprehensive understanding of the issues and conditions they are experiencing. With a wide range of volumes cover- ing key economic issues in developing economies, as well as examining the challenges faced as East Asia continues to integrate, the titles in this series are essential companions for academics and policymakers interested in cut- ting-edge research and analysis of developing economies. More information about this series at http://www.palgrave.com/gp/series/14861 Hirokazu Kikuchi Presidents versus Federalism in the National Legislative Process The Argentine Senate in Comparative Perspective Hirokazu Kikuchi Institute of Developing Economies Japan External Trade Organization Chiba, Japan IDE-JETRO Series ISBN 978-3-319-90112-1 ISBN 978-3-319-90113-8 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90113-8 Library of Congress Control Number: 2018942211 © Te Editor(s) (if applicable) and Te Author(s) 2018, corrected publication 2018 Tis work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifcally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microflms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.LA DEMOCRACIA EN PARAGUAY Un Breve Repaso Sobre
    Revista Enfoques: Ciencia Política y Administración Pública ISSN: 0718-0241 [email protected] Universidad Central de Chile Chile LÓPEZ, Magdalena LA DEMOCRACIA EN PARAGUAY Un breve repaso sobre los partidos políticos tradicionales, el sistema electoral y el triunfo de Fernando Lugo Méndez Revista Enfoques: Ciencia Política y Administración Pública, vol. VIII, núm. 13, 2010, pp. 89-106 Universidad Central de Chile Santiago, Chile Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=96016546007 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto LA DEMOCRACIA EN PARAGUAY Un breve repaso sobre los partidos políticos tradicionales, el sistema electoral y el triunfo de Fernando Lugo Méndez The democracy in Paraguay A brief review of the traditional political parties, the electoral system and Fernando Lugo Mendez’s victory Magdalena LÓPEZ1 Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina [email protected] Vol. VIII Nº 13, 2010, 89-106 Fecha de recepción: 30 de septiembre de 2010 Fecha de aceptación: 4 de octubre de 2010 Versión final: 20 de diciembre de 2010 RESUMEN: Este trabajo intentará caracterizar la historia política reciente del Paraguay, para comprender la importancia política y originalidad que supone el triunfo del ex obispo Fernando Armindo Lugo Méndez, después de 61 años ininterrumpidos del Partido Colorado en la Presidencia de dicho país. Además, pretenderá explicar cómo la actual disposición del Congreso dificulta la acción presidencial, puesto que las modificaciones electorales y constitucionales post dictadura stronista, dieron como resultado un escenario de “presidencialismo atenuado”.
    [Show full text]
  • Direct Democracy in Latin America: Between Delegation and Participation
    DOCUMENTO DE TRABAJO Nº 17 Direct democracy in Latin America: between delegation and participation Alicia Lissidini Marzo 2007 SERIE “DOCUMENTO DE TRABAJO” DE LA ESCUELA DE POLITICA Y GOBIERNO DE LA UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE SAN MARTIN La serie de Documentos de Trabajo refleja parte de las actividades de investigación de la Escuela de Política y Gobierno. Los documentos difunden productos parciales y preliminares de investigación, propuestas de trabajo y ponencias presentadas en congresos nacionales e internacionales. Para obtener copias de la Serie solicitarlas a [email protected] Direct democracy in Latin America: between delegation and participation1 Alicia Lissidini Escuela de Política y Gobierno Universidad Nacional de San Martín [email protected] The objective of this paper is to analyze the inclusion of mechanisms of direct democracy in the constitutions of Latin America and identify its reasons and trends. To this end I studied the constitutional reforms of each Latin American country, describing the social and political context of the inclusion along two fundamental axes: the prerogative of the executive power and the powers of citizens. The hypothesis is that mechanisms of direct democracy, incorporated mostly in the 1990s, are political tools that may promote citizen participation and involvement in public life as well as expand the influence of the executive powers in detriment of representative tools (such as political parties) and therefore, foster delegation. First of all it is imperative to explain that the concept of “direct democracy” admits a variety of definitions and gradations: ranging from “minimalists” conceptions that consider as direct democracy only a referendum, that is a popular consultation promoted by citizens with the purpose of approving or vetoing a law; others define direct democracy as any mechanism of civilian participation that involves voting (with the exception of elections) in other words popular consultation in their different juridical forms (referendum, plebiscite and recall).
    [Show full text]
  • THE CASE of the ARGENTINE SENATE By
    FEDERALISM AND THE LIMITS OF PRESIDENTIAL POWERS: THE CASE OF THE ARGENTINE SENATE by Hirokazu Kikuchi LL.B. in Political Science, Keio University, 2001 LL.M. in Political Science, Keio University, 2003 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2012 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH THE DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Hirokazu Kikuchi It was defended on November 2, 2012 and approved by Ernesto F. Calvo, Associate Professor, Department of Government and Politics, University of Maryland Scott Morgenstern, Associate Professor, Department of Political Science Jennifer Nicoll Victor, Assistant Professor, Department of Public and International Affairs, George Mason University Dissertation Advisor: Aníbal S. Pérez-Liñán, Associate Professor, Department of Political Science ii Copyright © by Hirokazu Kikuchi 2012 iii FEDERALISM AND THE LIMITS OF PRESIDENTIAL POWERS: THE CASE OF THE ARGENTINE SENATE Hirokazu Kikuchi, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2012 Under what conditions can subnational governments be national veto players? Many studies of federal countries have regarded governors as national veto players even though they do not have such a constitutional status. However, the statistical tests of comparative legislative studies and those of comparative federalism have not succeeded in showing gubernatorial effects on a national political arena. In this dissertation, I study the conditions under which governors can be national veto players by focusing on the treatment of presidential bills between 1983 and 2007 in the Argentine Senate. The dissertation shows that the Senate serves as an arena for subnational governments to influence national politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Pension System Reforms in Argentina
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Open Digital Archive at Oslo and Akershus University College Silvia I. Reyna Rickert ________________________________ Pension System Reforms in Argentina Why the U-Turn? Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences Abstract The 2008 Argentine pension reform represented a new change of paradigm in the country’s pension policy. It encompassed the elimination of the fully funded, defined contribution (DC), private tier of the so-called Integrated Retirement and Pensions System (SIJP) – a two- tiered arrangement implemented in 1994 and inspired by the World Bank’s recommendations contained in the work Averting the Old Age Crisis (World Bank 1994). And the shift back to a publicly managed, single-tiered pension system provided in a pay-as-you-go defined benefit (PAYG-DB) basis: the Argentine Integrated Retirement System (SIPA). In order to finally explain these events, in this thesis I present a detailed account of the events that took place in 2008, divided into six chapters. The first chapter introduces the topic, its background and the research question: Why did Argentina change its pension system back to a one-tiered, pay as you go DB system in 2008? The second explains the appropriateness of the research strategy and the design chosen for this study. In the third chapter, the reader is introduced to the events under analysis and the possible explanations or “suspects” to be explored upon. The fourth chapter provides the framework and settings to understand Argentina’s policy making process.
    [Show full text]
  • Anexo Ii Orden Nacional Deuda En Partidos Politicos Pesos
    República Argentina - Poder Ejecutivo Nacional 2018 - Año del Centenario de la Reforma Universitaria Anexo Disposicion Número: Referencia: ANEXO II PARTIDOS CADUCOS DEUDORES ANTE EL FONDO PARTIDARIO PERMANENTE ANEXO II ORDEN NACIONAL DEUDA EN PARTIDOS POLITICOS PESOS ($) ACCION POR LA REPUBLICA 32.668,92 AUTONOMISTA 55.434,19 DEL CAMPO POPULAR 10.171,75 EL MOVIMIENTO DE LAS PROVINCIAS UNIDAS 322.783,71 FRENTE DE LOS JUBILADOS 7.406,82 POPULAR DE LA RECONSTRUCCION 130.730,44 PROGRESO SOCIAL 51.008,88 UNION DEL CENTRO DEMOCRATICO 683.553,95 UNION Y LIBERTAD 52.121,81 DISTRITO: CAPITAL FEDERAL DEUDA EN PARTIDOS POLITICOS PESOS ($) ACCION POR LA REPUBLICA 23.218,05 ALTERNATIVA SOCIAL 39.224,88 ASAMBLEAS DEL PUEBLO POR EL SOCIALISMO Y LA 5.165,22 LIBERTAD ASAMBLEAS POPULARES 4.539,34 CAMBIO CON JUSTICIA SOCIAL 10.934,72 CONFEDERACION LABORISTA 4.013,14 CONVERGENCIA SOCIALISTA 9.595,37 CONVOCATORIA DE INTEGRACION CIUDADANA 185,62 DE LA CULTURA LA EDUCACION Y EL TRABAJO 18.464,92 DE LA GENERACION INTERMEDIA 18.672,54 DEL CAMPO POPULAR 38.525,11 ENCUENTRO CIVICO POR LA IGUALDAD Y LA JUSTICIA 4.539,34 FRENTE DE LOS TRABAJADORES DESOCUPADOS Y 13.454,72 JUBILADOS P/LA UNION CIUDAD DE BS. AS. FRENTE UNIDAD TRABAJADORA 3.333,20 FUERZA INDEPENDIENTE DE CENTRO 4.539,34 GESTA 11.271,03 DISTRITO: CAPITAL FEDERAL DEUDA EN PARTIDOS POLITICOS PESOS ($) INICIATIVA VERDE POR BS. AS. 5.165,22 LIGA SOCIALISTA REVOLUCIONARIA 1.186,79 MOVIMIENTO PARA LA PARTICIPACION DEL PUEBLO 1.811,36 MOVIMIENTO POR LA DIGNIDAD Y LA INDEPENDENCIA 4.132,18 PODER AUTONOMO 18.443,91 POLITICA ABIERTA PARA LA INTEGRIDAD SOCIAL 22.060,22 POPULAR DE LA RECONSTRUCCION 151,52 POPULAR DE LA RESTAURACION 34.804,46 RECONQUISTA 22.298,42 RECONSTRUCCION REPUBLICANA 11.418,98 TODOS POR LOS JUBILADOS 4.013,14 DISTRITO: BUENOS AIRES DEUDA EN PARTIDOS POLITICOS PESOS ($) AUTENTICO DE LOS CRISTIANOS DE LA PROV.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Local Politics and the Fall of Bolivia's Party System
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Faguet, Jean-Paul Working Paper Revolution from below: The rise of local politics and the fall of Bolivia's party system Working Paper Series, No. 17-180 Provided in Cooperation with: Department of International Development, London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) Suggested Citation: Faguet, Jean-Paul (2017) : Revolution from below: The rise of local politics and the fall of Bolivia's party system, Working Paper Series, No. 17-180, London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), Department of International Development, London This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/224806 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made
    [Show full text]
  • Crisis in Bolivia: the Elections of 2002 and Their Aftermath
    UNIVERSITY OF LONDON INSTITUTE OF LATIN AMERICAN STUDIES RESEARCH PAPERS Crisis in Bolivia: The Elections of 2002 and their Aftermath Willem Assies and Ton Salman CRISIS IN BOLIVIA: THE ELECTIONS OF 2002 AND THEIR AFTERMATH Willem Assies and Ton Salman Institute of Latin American Studies 31 Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9HA Willem Assies works at the Centre for Rural Studies of El Colegio de Michoacan in Zamora, Michoacan, Mexico ([email protected]). Ton Salman works at the Department of Social and Cultural Anthropology of the Free University in Amsterdam, The Netherlands ([email protected]). British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 1 900039 60 5 ISSN 0957 7947 © Institute of Latin American Studies University of London, 2003 ACRONYMS ADN Accion Democratica Nacionalista AP Acuerdo Patriotico APDHB Asamblea Permanente de Derechos Humanos de Bolivia ASP Asamblea por la Soberania de los Pueblos CAO Camara Agropecuaria del Oriente CIDOB Confederacion Indigena del Oriente, Chaco y Amazonia de Bolivia COMUNAL Coordinadora de Movilizaciones Unica Nacional COB Central Obrera Boliviana CONDEPA Conciencia de Patria CSUTCB Confederacion Sindical Unica de Trabajadores Campesinos de Bolivia GANPI Gran Asamblea Nacional de los Pueblos Indigenas IU Izquierda Unida LyJ Libertad y Justicia MAS Movimiento al Socialismo MBL Movimiento Bolivia Libre MIP Movimiento Indigenista Pachacuti MIR Movimiento de Izquierda Revolucionaria MNR Movimiento Nacionalista Revolucionario MRTKL Movimiento Revolucionario Tupaj Katari de Liberacion MST Movimiento Sin Tierra NFR Nueva Fuerza Republicana PS-1 Partido Socialista-Uno UCS Unidad Civica Solidaridad UDP Union Democratica y Popular PREFACE Bolivia's president Gonzalo Sanchez de Lozada stepped down on 17 October 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges of Party-Building in Latin America Steven Levitsky James
    CHAPTER 1 Introduction: Challenges of Party-Building in Latin America Steven Levitsky James Loxton Brandon Van Dyck Political parties are the pillars of representative democracy. Political scientists have long argued that democracy is “unworkable” (Aldrich 1995: 3) or even “unthinkable” (Schattschneider 1942: 1) without them. Yet four decades into the third wave of democratization, parties remain weak in much of Latin America. Since 1990, major parties have weakened dramatically or collapsed altogether in Argentina, Bolivia, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Guatemala, Peru, and Venezuela.1 At the same time, most efforts to build new parties have failed. The regional landscape is littered with the corpses of new parties that either failed to take off or experienced brief electoral success but then fizzled out or collapsed.2 Consequently, most Latin American party systems are more fluid today than they were two decades ago. Of the six party systems scored as “institutionalized” in Mainwaring and Scully’s (1995) seminal work, one (Venezuela) has collapsed fully, three (Argentina, Colombia, Costa Rica) have collapsed partially, and a fifth (Chile) has arguably been “uprooted” (Luna and Altman 2011).3 Of the four party systems that Mainwaring and Scully (1995) classified as “inchoate,” only Brazil’s has 1 On party weakness and party system collapse in Latin America, see Roberts and Wibbels (1999); Sánchez (2009); Morgan (2011); Seawright (2012); and Lupu (2014, 2016). 2 Examples include the United Left (IU), Liberty Movement, Independent Moralizing Front (FIM), and Union for Peru (UPP) in Peru; the Front for a Country in Solidarity (FREPASO), the Union of the Democratic Center (UCEDE), the Movement for Dignity and Independence (MODIN), and Action for the Republic in Argentina; the National Encounter Party (PEN) in Paraguay; the Guatemalan Republican Front (FRG), National Advancement Party (PAN), and Guatemalan National Revolutionary Unity (URNG) in Guatemala; and the M-19 Democratic Alliance (AD M-19) in Colombia.
    [Show full text]
  • Amrica Latina: Balance Electoral 2002
    An Assessment of Latin America’s Elections in 2002 Daniel Zovatto and Julio Burdman1 Working Paper nº 31/2004 Introduction Before entering into a detailed examination of the elections that were held in Latin America in 2002, it is worth noting the unique historical situation in the region since the start of the ‘third wave’ of democratization. The past 25 years have seen the longest and most far-reaching process of democratization in the region2. Despite the unequal results achieved by the democratic process in terms of both development and quality, it is in the area of civil liberties that perhaps the greatest change has taken place. The historical context, experiences at home and the international situation have led democracy to be the only viable option during the entire period. Any government hoping to retain a hold on power must declare itself openly democratic and adhere to the results of the ballot box. It must institutionalize the political process, guarantee human rights, maintain an independent judicial system, plurality and freedom of expression, ie, introduce democratic practices that are absent in authoritarian regimes. Never before have there been so many elected democratic governments, nor as many transitions towards democracy. This has not necessarily implied full satisfaction with democracy; indeed, even in those countries where democracy has been firmly established, much of the population is still disappointed with the economic and social results. As the United Nations Development Program3 notes, many engaged in the fight for democracy in the hope that it would bring with it social justice, greater participation 1 The authors would like to thank Silvia Pizarro and Ileana Aguilar for their help in preparing this article.
    [Show full text]