DOCSLIB.ORG

Editorial 1662 and All That

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Editorial 1662 and All That ECCLESIOLOGY Ecclesiology 9 (2013) 157–160 brill.com/ecso Editorial 1662 and All That The first two articles in this issue of Ecclesiology (those by the Revd Canon Professor David M. Thompson and the Revd Canon Professor Paul Fiddes: both being Nonconformist ministers with honorary canonries in Church of England cathedrals, Ely and Oxford respectively) tackle issues arising from the turbulent events of mid-seventeenth century Britain, the aftermath of the English Civil War of the 1640s. They examine the reception and legacy of those events, especially of the Great Ejection of 1662, and the ecumenical fall-out from them. Earlier versions of these articles were given as papers at the conference ‘The Great Ejection: Historical and Ecumenical Perspectives’, which I helped to organise at the University of Exeter, England, in August 2012. The conference was sponsored by the Department of Theology, University of Exeter, and Churches Together in England and was subsidised by the St Luke’s College Foundation. Historians still argue over the relative importance of the constitutional, religious, and social factors in the Civil War. What is clear is that the Parliament summoned in 1640 to provide finance for King Charles I’s policy in Scotland was originally united in rejecting what it regarded as the King’s unconstitutional actions in the eleven years since Parliament had last met, the years of the King’s ‘Personal Rule’. However, when those who thought that the process of Reformation, leading to the Elizabethan Settlement of 1559, was incomplete and were offended at that, tried to press for further reforms on the model of Calvin’s and Beza’s Geneva, that original parlia- mentary unity evaporated. With Scottish assistance, the Puritans (who were at this time within the Church of England) pressed their demands and a civil war followed. The Westminster Assembly of Divines (1643-49), which was appointed by Parliament, produced a new Confession of Faith (which was never adopted by Parliament) and a Directory of Worship (which was not a liturgy) to replace the Prayer Book. The Christian calendar disappeared © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2013 DOI 10.1163/17455316-00902002 <UN> 158 P. Avis / Ecclesiology 9 (2013) 157–160 with its feasts and fasts. Episcopacy was abolished and the bishops went abroad or lay low. Cathedral foundations were dissolved. The Archbishop of Canterbury, William Laud (who had antagonised the Puritans by his high church measures), and later the King, Charles I, fell to the executioner’s axe. Large numbers of traditional Anglican clergy suffered deprivation and hardship, and ministers of Presbyterian and Independent views took their places in the parish churches, cathedrals, and universities. However, the Independents and the Presbyterians were not a united front and had their own ways of worship and church government. For example, Exeter Cathedral was divided into two by a brick wall at the chancel arch (where the Golden Gates are now): Presbyterians worshipped in the Choir, while Independents worshipped in the nave (so the Presbyterians had seats and perhaps heating, while the Independents, though probably more numer- ous, had to stand and in winter shiver). Many ordinary people were bewildered by what was happening and missed the festivals of the Christian year, especially Christmas and Easter. ‘Merry England’ was not so any more, if it ever really existed. The exiled Charles II’s promise of liberty to tender consciences in the Declaration of Breda encouraged Parliament to invite him to return, and the monarchy was restored in 1660. But the new Parliament elected in that year was less willing to compromise; and after the failure of churchmen to agree at the Savoy Conference, the Act of Uniformity was approved in 1662. The Prayer Book and with it episcopal ordination and jurisdiction, was re-imposed in what became its definitive form. (So for Anglicans, 1662 is a date that is commemorated with thanksgiving for the restoration of the Anglican liturgy, the Christian calendar and episcopal polity.) Anglican churchmen, who had been ejected from their parishes and college fellowships and who had lived in exile abroad or in obscurity at home, were in no mood for compromise. Charles I was commemorated liturgically as a martyr every 30th of January (and still is by some). Those ministers who, on theological grounds, could not accept the requirements of the Act of Uniformity were forced to leave and many hundreds did so, including some who had been episcopally ordained, such as Richard Baxter, who could have stayed. Many clergy suffered hardship in what became known as The Great Ejection (in the Nonconformist tradition this is sometimes known as the Great Ejectment). The Church of England suffered too, by the loss of approximately one fifth of its clergy, many of them ministers of the highest calibre, while the ejected ministers (some of whom later conformed) increasingly threw their lot in with those <UN>.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Empowering Popularity: the Fuel Behind a Witch-Hunt
    EMPOWERING POPULARITY: THE FUEL BEHIND A WITCH-HUNT ________________________________ A Thesis Presented to The Honors Tutorial College Ohio University ________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for Graduation From the Honors Tutorial College With the degree of Bachelor of Arts in History ________________________________ Written by Grace Konyar April 2017 Table of Contents List of Figures ……………………………………………………………………….2 Introduction………………………………………………………………………….3 Chapter One………………………………………………………………………..10 Who Lives, Who Dies, Who Tells Your Story: The Development of Witchcraft as a Gendered Crime Chapter Two………………………………………………………………………………...31 The World Turned Upside Down: The Fragility of the Suffolk and Essex Witch-Hunts Chapter Three ……………………………………………………………………………...52 That Would Be Enough: The Tipping Point of Spectral Evidence Chapter Four………………………………………………………………………74 Satisfied: The Balance of Ethics and Fame Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………….93 Bibliography………………………………………………………………………………..97 1 List of Figures Image 1: Frontispiece, Matthew Hopkins, The Discovery of Witches, London, 1647…...........................................................................................................................40 Image 2: Indictment document 614 of the Essex Summer Sessions for Maria Sterling. Courtesy of The National Archives- Kew, ASSI 35/86/1/72. Photograph by the author………………………………………………………………………………....41 Image 3: Frontispiece, A True Relation of the Araignment of eighteen Witches, London, 1945……………………………………...……….…………………………48
    [Show full text]
  • Come, Holy Ghost
    Come, Holy Ghost John Cosin and 17th Century Anglicanism Notes from sabbatical study leave, Summer 2016 Donald Allister Come, Holy Ghost Sabbatical study Copyright © Donald Allister 2017 2 Come, Holy Ghost Sabbatical study Contents Come, Holy Ghost 4 Personal Interest 5 The Legacy of the 16th Century 8 Arminianism and the Durham House Group 10 The Origins of the Civil War 13 Cosin’s Collection of Private Devotions 14 Controversy, Cambridge, Catastrophe 16 Exile, Roman Catholicism, and the Huguenots 18 Breda, Savoy, the Book of Common Prayer, and the Act of Uniformity 22 Cosin’s Other Distinctive Views 25 Reflections 26 Collects written by Cosin and included in the 1662 Prayer Book 29 Cosin’s Last Testament 30 Some key dates 33 Bibliography 35 3 Come, Holy Ghost Sabbatical study Come, Holy Ghost, our souls inspire, and lighten with celestial fire. Thou the anointing Spirit art, who dost thy sevenfold gifts impart. Thy blessed unction from above is comfort, life, and fire of love. Enable with perpetual light the dullness of our blinded sight. Anoint and cheer our soiled face with the abundance of thy grace. Keep far from foes, give peace at home: where thou art guide, no ill can come. Teach us to know the Father, Son, and thee, of both, to be but One, that through the ages all along, this may be our endless song: Praise to thy eternal merit, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Amen.1 Original Latin ascribed to Rabanus Maurus (died AD 856), traditionally sung at Pentecost, Confirmations, and Ordinations: Veni, creator Spiritus, / mentes tuorum visita, / imple superna gratia, / quae tu creasti, pectora.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Introduction Other Voices: Dissenting Women Mary Franklin (d. 1711) was the wife of the Reverend Robert Franklin (1630–1703), one of some two thousand Nonconformist ministers who were “ejected” from their pulpits and their livings on Black Bartholomew’s Day,1 August 24, 1662, following the Restoration of Charles II (1630–1685). In May 1660, Charles returned from exile in Europe, beginning the Restoration of the monarchy. He was crowned on April 23, 1661. Though for many English subjects the Restoration was a joyous occasion, for the Dissenters,2 and especially for ministers and their relations, these became times that tried their souls. Mary Franklin wrote a narrative of her experi- ence of these times, taking up, late in life, one of her husband’s incomplete sermon notebooks, turning it upside down, and using its blank pages for her purposes.3 She wrote about her life as a minister’s wife and her family’s suffering under a govern- ment that exacted religious conformity to the Church of England as a measure of loyalty to the crown. She also recorded the triumph of God’s providences through it all. She did not seek publication of her brief, detailed, and moving testimony but rather seems to have kept the notebook within her family until her death, after 1. The name Black Bartholomew’s Day harkens back to a day of infamy for the Protestant godly, St. Bartholomew’s Day massacre, August 24, 1572, when tens of thousands of French Huguenots (Calvinists) were slaughtered by the Catholic King Charles IX. See N.
    [Show full text]
  • Desatando La Verdad De Dios, Un Versículo a La Vez
    Gracia a Vosotros :: desatando la verdad de Dios, un versículo a la vez The Danger of Calling the Church to Repent Code: B181008 Have you ever heard of a church that repented? Not individuals, but an entire church that collectively recognized its congregational transgressions and openly, genuinely repented, with biblical sorrow and brokenness. Sadly, you probably have not. For that matter, have you ever heard of a pastor who called his church to repent and threatened his congregation with divine judgment if they failed to do so? It’s not likely. Pastors today seem to have a hard enough time calling individuals to repent, let alone calling the whole church to account for their corporate sins. In fact, if a pastor were so bold as to lead his own church to repent, he might not be the pastor for much longer. At minimum, he would face resistance and scorn from within the congregation. That inevitable backlash is likely strong enough to generate a kind of preemptive fear, keeping most church leaders from ever considering a call for corporate repentance. On the other hand, if a pastor or church leader has the temerity to call for another church—rather than his own—to repent, he will almost certainly be accused of being critical, divisive, and overstepping his authority. He’ll face a chorus of voices telling him to mind his own business. Vilifying him, therefore, clears a path for the confronted church to sidestep his admonition altogether. The fact is, churches rarely repent. Churches that start down a path of worldliness, disobedience, and apostasy typically move even further from orthodoxy over time.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1641 Lords' Subcommittee on Religious Innovation
    A “Theological Junto”: the 1641 Lords’ subcommittee on religious innovation Introduction During the spring of 1641, a series of meetings took place at Westminster, between a handful of prominent Puritan ministers and several of their Conformist counterparts. Officially, these men were merely acting as theological advisers to a House of Lords committee: but both the significance, and the missed potential, of their meetings was recognised by contemporary commentators and has been underlined in recent scholarship. Writing in 1655, Thomas Fuller suggested that “the moderation and mutual compliance of these divines might have produced much good if not interrupted.” Their suggestions for reform “might, under God, have been a means, not only to have checked, but choked our civil war in the infancy thereof.”1 A Conformist member of the sub-committee agreed with him. In his biography of John Williams, completed in 1658, but only published in 1693, John Hacket claimed that, during these meetings, “peace came... near to the birth.”2 Peter Heylyn was more critical of the sub-committee, in his biography of William Laud, published in 1671; but even he was quite clear about it importance. He wrote: Some hoped for a great Reformation to be prepared by them, and settled by the grand committee both in doctrine and discipline, and others as much feared (the affections of the men considered) that doctrinal Calvinism being once settled, more alterations would be made in the public liturgy... till it was brought more near the form of Gallic churches, after the platform of Geneva.3 A number of Non-conformists also looked back on the sub-committee as a missed opportunity.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses The Eucharistic liturgy in the English independent, or congregational, tradition: a study of its changing structure and content 1550 - 1974 Spinks, Bryan D. How to cite: Spinks, Bryan D. (1978) The Eucharistic liturgy in the English independent, or congregational, tradition: a study of its changing structure and content 1550 - 1974, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/9577/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 BRYAN D. SPINKS THE EUCHARISTIC LITURGY. IN THE ENGLISH INDEPENDENT. OR CONGREGATIONAL,. TRADITION: A STUDY OF ITS CHANGING- STRUCTURE AND CONTENT 1550 - 1974 B.D.-THESIS 1978' The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. Chapter .17 of this thesis is based upon part of an unpublished essay 1 The 1'apact of the Liturgical Movement on ii'ucharistic Liturgy of too Congregational Church in Jiu gland and Wales ', successfully presented for the degree of Master of Theology of the University of London, 1972.
    [Show full text]
  • Anglican Worship and Sacramental Theology 1
    The Beauty of Holiness: Anglican Worship and Sacramental Theology 1 THE CONGRESS OF TRADITIONAL ANGLICANS June 1–4, 2011 - Victoria, BC, Canada An Address by The Reverend Canon Kenneth Gunn-Walberg, Ph.D. Rector of St. Mary’s, Wilmington, Delaware After Morning Prayer Friday in Ascensiontide, June 3, 2011 THE BEAUTY OF HOLINESS: ANGLICAN WORSHIP AND SACRAMENTAL THEOLOGY When I was approached by Fr. Sinclair to make this presentation, he suggested that the conceptual framework of the lectures would be that they be positive presentations of traditional Anglican principles from both a biblical and historical perspective and in the light of the contemporary issues in contrast to traditional Anglicanism, especially as expressed in the Affirmation of St. Louis and in the 39 Articles. The rubrics attached to this paper were that Anglican worship should be examined in the light of contemporary liturgies, the Roman Rite, and the proposed revision of the Book of Common Prayer to bring it in line with Roman views. This perforce is a rather tall order; so let us begin. The late Pulitzer Prize winning poet W.H. Auden stated that the Episcopal Church “seems to have gone stark raving mad…And why? The Roman Catholics have had to start from scratch, and as any of them with a feeling for language will admit, they have made a cacophonous horror of the mass. Whereas we had the extraordinary good fortune in that our Prayer Book was composed at exactly the right historical moment. The English language had become more or less what it is today…but the ecclesiastics of the 16 th century still professed a feeling for the ritual and ceremonies which today we have almost entirely lost.” 1 While one might quibble somewhat with what he said, he certainly would have been more indignant had he witnessed me little more than a decade after his death celebrating the Eucharist before the Dean and Canons of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Matthew Henry Was Born Was a Momentous One for the Religious History of England
    CHAPTER 1 The Puritan Environment The year in which Matthew Henry was born was a momentous one for the religious history of England. In that year, 1662, over 2000 pastors were ejected from their parishes in the Church of England because they refused to conform to the requirements laid upon them by the Act of Uniformity. This meant that those pastors who were labelled as nonconformists, and who became Presbyterian, Baptist or Congregational, were deprived of oppor- tunities to minister publicly, and nonconformist students were ex- cluded from Oxford and Cambridge Universities. The fact that Matthew Henry’s father, Philip Henry, was one of those ejected brought the religious issues of the day right into the family circle. But the Great Ejection, as it was called, was only one of sev- eral important events in seventeenth-century England. It was marked by the overthrow of the monarchy and the Church of England, and then their subsequent re-establishment. The rift between Charles I and the Parliament became so great that two civil wars eventuated (1642-48), in which Royalists were pitted against Roundheads, the nickname for supporters of the Parlia- ment. The Parliament’s New Model Army was victorious and Charles I was executed in January 1649. Previously executed were Thomas Wentworth, Earl of Strafford, the Lord Lieuten- ant of Ireland (May 1641), and William Laud, the Archbishop of 11 MMatthewatthew HHenry-enry- AAllanllan HHarmanarman - CCopy.inddopy.indd 1111 009/01/20129/01/2012 115:14:335:14:33 Matthew Henry Canterbury (January 1645). Episcopal rule in the church was set aside, and use of the Book of Common Prayer outlawed.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoration, Religion, and Revenge Heather Thornton Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2005 Restoration, religion, and revenge Heather Thornton Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Thornton, Heather, "Restoration, religion, and revenge" (2005). LSU Master's Theses. 558. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/558 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RESTORATION, RELIGION AND REVENGE A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of History By Heather D. Thornton B.A., Lousiana State University, 1999 M. Div., Golden Gate Baptist Theological Seminary, 2002 December 2005 In Memory of Laura Fay Thornton, 1937-2003, Who always believed in me ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank many people who both encouraged and supported me in this process. My advisor, Dr. Victor Stater, offered sound criticism and advice throughout the writing process. Dr. Christine Kooi and Dr. Maribel Dietz who served on my committee and offered critical outside readings. I owe thanks to my parents Kevin and Jorenda Thornton who listened without knowing what I was talking about as well as my grandparents Denzil and Jo Cantley for prayers and encouragement.
    [Show full text]
  • Anglican Principles for Liturgical Revision
    ATR/92:3 Expressing What Christians Believe: Anglican Principles for Liturgical Revision J. Barrington Bates* What principles have guided liturgical revision in the Anglican Communion? This essay attempts to address that question for each of four historical periods, as well as offer suggestions for fu- ture revision. The author asserts that we cannot simply forge ahead with more experimental texts and trial liturgies if we truly endeavor both to value the inherited tradition and to move where the Spirit is leading us. By working toward a shared understand- ing of principles for liturgical revision, the Episcopal Church and other entities in the Anglican Communion can potentially avoid fractious conflict, produce better quality liturgical texts, and foster confidence that we are following divine guidance. “Liturgy expresses what Christians believe. To change the liturgy therefore runs the risk of changing doctrine—or at least those doctrines which worshippers regularly hear and absorb and which become part of their Christian identity.”1 Since the formal establishment of a separate identity for the Church of England from that of Rome in the sixteenth century, the various church entities that now form the Anglican Communion have made numerous revisions to their liturgy. What principles have guided these efforts? This essay attempts to address that question for each of four historical periods: (1) the reforms of the sixteenth cen- tury, focusing on the claims made by Thomas Cranmer and Richard * J. Barrington Bates currently serves as rector of the Church of the Annunciation in Oradell, New Jersey (www.annunciationoradell.org). He holds a Ph.D. in liturgical studies from Drew University, as well as master’s degrees from the Church Divin- ity School of the Pacific, the Graduate Theological Union, the General Theological Seminary, and Drew.
    [Show full text]
  • Baxter to Cummins: the Debate Over the Language of Baptismal Regeneration in the Book of Common Prayer, 1662 – 1873
    Baxter to Cummins: The Debate Over The Language of Baptismal Regeneration In The Book of Common Prayer, 1662 – 1873 The Rev. S. Gregory Jones, Associate Rector St. James’s Episcopal Church Richmond, Virginia Accepted for Master of Divinity with Honors The General Theological Seminary of the Episcopal Church May 1999 Preface Added July 2001 1 Table of Contents Baxter to Cummins: 1 July 2001 Preface 4 Introduction 5 What this thesis will do 6 Prayer Book Language of Regeneration: The Heart of the Matter 6 Puritan Baptismal Theology 7 Catholic Doctrine of Baptismal Regeneration 8 The Savoy Conference 10 The Exceptions 11 The Textual Objections 16 The Glorious Revolution and Prayer Book Revision 20 Eighteenth Century Developments 22 Evolution of Anglican Evangelicalism 25 Whitefield’s Neo-Puritanism 26 Daniel Waterland on Baptism 29 The Proposed American Prayer Book 32 The Decades Before the Tracts 35 Waterland Loses Ground to Higher Sacramentalism 39 The General Convention Proposal of 1826 40 The Oxford Movement 42 The Baptism of Puseyism 44 The Gorham Case 46 John Henry Hopkins on the Gorham Case 47 Evangelical Calls for Revision in the 1860's 52 Cheney Case 54 2 The “Nine” and Evangelical Calls for Revision 55 Bishop Horatio Potter’s Response to the “Nine” 56 The Evangelical Response to Potter 58 C.W. Andrews 59 1871 General Convention Proposal 61 Then Why the Schism of the Reformed Episcopal Church? 62 Epilogue 65 3 July 2001 Preface It is now more than two years since I put this thesis to rest, and much has happened in the Episcopal Church to rekindle my interest in this debate.
    [Show full text]
  • 13Enjamtn 1Anel? : the LAUDIAN SCHOOL and the NONCONFORMIST
    BENJAMIN LANEY :13enjamtn 1anel? : THE LAUDIAN SCHOOL AND THE NONCONFORMIST. ENJAMIN LANEY, Bishop of Lincoln, enjoyed the B privilege of preaching before the King at Whitehall on March 12, 1665, and he took the opportunity thus afforded of expressing his thoughts on the ecclesiastical situation of the moment. Laney was a scholar of repute, a High Churchman of the Laudian school, and a devoted Royalist. It goes therefore without saying that he found no favour when Parliament, in its struggle with King and Church, gained the ascendancy. He was driven from his rectory at Buriton, from his residentiary canonry at Westminster, and from the mastership of Pembroke Hall, Cambridge. Deprived of all preferment, he attached himself to the person of Charles I., whose chaplain he was; serving Charles I I. in the same capacity after his father's execution. As one of the victims of the reign of nonconformity he had suffered much, and it was only reasonable that at the Restora­ tion he should receive a measure of compensation. Accordingly, he was at once made Dean of Rochester, and later in the same year (1660) he was consecrated to the See of Peterborough. On the death of Bishop Sanderson in 1662 he was translated to Lincoln, and on the death of Bishop Wren in 1667 to Ely, where he remained until his death in 167 5 at the age of eighty­ four. He never married, and he enjoyed the reputation of great generosity in the use of his substance for works of piety and philanthropy. No biographer has told the story of Laney's life, and for this reason little has come down to us of his personal history; but (independently of his rapid promotion after the return of the King) that his reputation for scholarship and influence stood high among his contemporaries is vouched for by the fact that on two impt>rtant occasions he , was put forward to BENJAMIN LANEY 347 represent the interests of the Church of England.
    [Show full text]