DOCSLIB.ORG

Iran-Iraq War(1980-1988) ○ Both US and USSR Support Saddam Hussein

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Iran-Iraq War(1980-1988) ○ Both US and USSR Support Saddam Hussein Week 5: Proxy Wars Non-Ideological Interventions “My enemy’s enemy is my friend” ● Ogaden War (1977-1978) US supports Maoists in Somalia ● Iran-Iraq War(1980-1988) ○ Both US and USSR support Saddam Hussein. Ogaden: Sino-Soviet Split ● Chinese mainland becomes communist in 1949 under Mao Zedong. ● Diverge from Soviet model ○ Still dependent on industrial aid ● Denunciation and split in 1959. Border War in 1969 ● Chinese demand return of border territories. ● China initiates conflict. ● Soviets respond, imply larger war. Chinese Rapprochement with US ● China sees USSR as primary security threat. ● Tacit alliance with US after 1972. Ethiopian Revolution ● Ruled by Emperor Haile Selassie until 1974. ● Selassie overthrown by Army officers (Derg). Internal Fighting in Derg ● Marxists prevail by 1977. ● Seek Soviet aid and support. ● Soviets support Somalia prior to 1977. Why were the Soviets reluctant to support the Derg? What changed their minds? Why were the Soviets reluctant to support the Derg? ● Division in the Derg. ● Support in rival Somalia What changed their minds? ● Mengistu’s rise to power. ● Somali distance. Somalia under Siad Barre ● Took power in coup in 1969. ● Maoist leaning. ● Soviet-backed until 1977. Somalia supports WSLF ● Barre seeks Greater Somalia ● Supports Western Somali Liberation Front in Ogaden in revolt. ● Somali troops join fighting Soviets back Mengistu; US and China support Somalia ● Soviet aid flows to new government in Ethiopia. ● Somalia invades with US and Chinese support The Ogaden War Supported by: Course of the War ● Initial success for Somalia ● Soviet, Cuban and South Yemeni troops intervene. ● Somali troops expelled Post-Ogaden War Ethiopia Somalia ● 15-year civil war ● Barre overthrown after ● Mengistu overthrown in civil war. 1991. ● State collapse and ● Federal state disintegration. established. Ba’athist Iraq ● Secular nationalist Ba’ath (renaissance) Party comes to power in coup. ● Dominated by Sunni Arabs. ● Saddam Hussein absolute ruler by 1978. Saddam’s Rule ● Cult of personality ● Shia opposition ● Soviet client state Iranian Revolution ● Opposition to Shah’s rule widespread. ● Protests in 1977 and 1978. ● Shah overthrown by coalition in 1979. Ayatollah Khomeini establishes theocracy Iraq invades Iran; why? Iraq invades Iran; why? ● Threat from Shia theocracy. ● Expansion of territory; oil reserves. ● Uniting domestic opponents. Both US and USSR initially neutral Why? Both US and USSR initially neutral US ● Courted Iran ● Distrust Iraq USSR ● Also, courted Iran Iran recovers; invades Iraq in 1982 Military Support to Warring Parties US and USSR back Iraq; Why? US US and USSR back Iraq; Why? US USSR ● Contain spread of Shia theocracy. ● Hostage crisis in Lebanon. US and USSR back Iraq; Why? US USSR ● Contain spread of ● Anti-communism in Shia theocracy. Iran. ● Retain influence in ● Hostage crisis in Middle East. Lebanon. ● Unrest in Soviet Central Asia + Afghanistan Iran-Iraq War: devastating stalemate ● No territorial changes. ● Almost 1 million dead (soldiers + civilians) Effects ● Emboldened Iraq invades Kuwait. ● Shia uprising in Iraq after Gulf War. ● Regional Sunni-Shia schism. Discussion Did superpowers obtain favorable outcomes from using proxies? Short term? Long term? Are there problems in using proxy armies/states? If so, would these problems have occurred without superpower intervention? Summary ● Ideology dissipates by 1970s and 1980s. ● Both superpowers willing to support ideological antagonists or mutual friends. ● Proxy wars are instrumental Next Week: Military Action: The Good + Proposals due on November 8.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Chair of the African Union
    Th e Chair of the African Union What prospect for institutionalisation? THE EVOLVING PHENOMENA of the Pan-African organisation to react timeously to OF THE CHAIR continental and international events. Th e Moroccan delegation asserted that when an event occurred on the Th e chair of the Pan-African organisation is one position international scene, member states could fail to react as that can be scrutinised and defi ned with diffi culty. Its they would give priority to their national concerns, or real political and institutional signifi cance can only be would make a diff erent assessment of such continental appraised through a historical analysis because it is an and international events, the reason being that, con- institution that has evolved and acquired its current trary to the United Nations, the OAU did not have any shape and weight through practical engagements. Th e permanent representatives that could be convened at any expansion of the powers of the chairperson is the result time to make a timely decision on a given situation.2 of a process dating back to the era of the Organisation of Th e delegation from Sierra Leone, a former member African Unity (OAU) and continuing under the African of the Monrovia group, considered the hypothesis of Union (AU). the loss of powers of the chairperson3 by alluding to the Indeed, the desirability or otherwise of creating eff ect of the possible political fragility of the continent on a chair position had been debated among members the so-called chair function. since the creation of the Pan-African organisation.
    [Show full text]
  • 9/11 Report”), July 2, 2004, Pp
    Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page i THE 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page v CONTENTS List of Illustrations and Tables ix Member List xi Staff List xiii–xiv Preface xv 1. “WE HAVE SOME PLANES” 1 1.1 Inside the Four Flights 1 1.2 Improvising a Homeland Defense 14 1.3 National Crisis Management 35 2. THE FOUNDATION OF THE NEW TERRORISM 47 2.1 A Declaration of War 47 2.2 Bin Ladin’s Appeal in the Islamic World 48 2.3 The Rise of Bin Ladin and al Qaeda (1988–1992) 55 2.4 Building an Organization, Declaring War on the United States (1992–1996) 59 2.5 Al Qaeda’s Renewal in Afghanistan (1996–1998) 63 3. COUNTERTERRORISM EVOLVES 71 3.1 From the Old Terrorism to the New: The First World Trade Center Bombing 71 3.2 Adaptation—and Nonadaptation— ...in the Law Enforcement Community 73 3.3 . and in the Federal Aviation Administration 82 3.4 . and in the Intelligence Community 86 v Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page vi 3.5 . and in the State Department and the Defense Department 93 3.6 . and in the White House 98 3.7 . and in the Congress 102 4. RESPONSES TO AL QAEDA’S INITIAL ASSAULTS 108 4.1 Before the Bombings in Kenya and Tanzania 108 4.2 Crisis:August 1998 115 4.3 Diplomacy 121 4.4 Covert Action 126 4.5 Searching for Fresh Options 134 5.
    [Show full text]
  • FBI054535 ~~N Diaspora Customs Traditions :··
    ACLURM055018 FBI054535 US Somali Diaspora 8 Clan I0 Islamic Traditions II Flag . 12 Cultural Customs 16 Language ··13 .1ega[.Jssues .. :.... :"'. :·· .•... ;Appendix :,:·.\{ ... ~~N FBI054536 ACLURM055019 ~~ ~A~ History (U) 21 October. 1969: Corruption and a power vacuum in the Somali government Somalia, located at the Horn of Africa (U) culminate in a bloodless coup led by Major near the Arabian Peninsula, has been a General Muhammad Siad Barre. crossroads of civilization for thousands of years. Somalia played an important role in (U) 1969-1991: Siad Barre establishes the commerce of ancient Egyptians, and with a military dictatorship that divides and later Chinese, Greek, and Arab traders. oppresses Somalis. (U) 18th century: Somalis develop a (U) 27 January J99J: Siad Barre flees culture shaped by pastoral nomadism and Mogadishu, and the Somali state collapses~ adherence to Islam. Armed dan-based militias fight for power. (U) 1891-1960: European powers create (U) 1991-199S:The United Nations five separate Somali entities: Operation in Somalia (UNISOM) I and II- initially a US-led, UN-sanctioned multilateral » British Somaliland (north central). intervention-attempts to resolve the » French Somaliland (east and southeast). civil war and provide humanitarian aid. » Italian Somaliland (south). The ambitious UNISOM mandate to rebuild » Ethiopian Somaliland (the Ogaden). a Somali government threatens warlords' >> The Northern Frontier District (NFD) interests and fighting ensues. UN forces of Kenya. depart in 1995, leaving Somalia in a state (U) ., 960: Italian and British colonies of violence and anarchy. Nearly I million merge into the independent Somali Republic. refugees and almost 5 million people risk starvation and disease. Emigration rises (U} 1960-1969: Somalia remains sharply.
    [Show full text]
  • Refugee Exodus from Somalia: Revisiting the Causes Hassan A
    Refugee Exodus from Somalia: Revisiting the Causes Hassan A. Mohamed Rhmc? needed to be rescued from themselves Cet article se propose d'exarniner les causes du conflit Somalien qui a (Rakia 1992). provoque l'exode de plus de deux millions de rkfugies. Par une approche It is unfortunate that the discourse historique du developpement de la tra@die, l'auteur offre une perspective on the crisis in Somalia has so far ig- plus complexe et tres differente de celle offerte par les medias qui se nored the complex historical develop- cantonnent dans des discussions simplistes et superficielles des symptbmes ment of the tragedy. Abdi Samatar actuels. Pour Hassan Mohammed, les causes de la crise Somalienne sont liees (1992, 626) aptly described the prob- Bun processus de desintegration de la societe civile et de ses valeurs sociales, lem: culturelleset politiques, une desintegration qui resulte de quatre evhements One of the casualties of the gruesome historiques: le decoupage de la nation et du territoire Somalien en plusieurs nightmare that is gripping Somalia entites; l'impact de la guerre froide; l'imposition de systemes politique, has been the capacity to thinkhistori- culture1 et educatif &rangers B la culture Somalienne; et enfin, la manipula- cally and systematically about the nature of the malady, and to find tion et l'exploitation des divisions claniques par l'elite politique afin de practical ways of controlling the demeurer au pouvoir. present in order to build a more sus- tainable future. Introduction stream explanations. The severity of the crisis in Somalia was largely un- The failure of "Operation Restore The most recent and probably the larg- known to the outside world prior to Hope" is an apt illustration of this est refugee exodus in the history of the the televised images of starving multi- point; the good intentionsof the opera- Horn of Africa started in Somalia in tudes and marauding armed young- tion made many innocent Somalis vic- 1988.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating Another Imagined “Great Satan” Will Not Absolve Iran Mr. Zarif by Dr
    Creating Another Imagined “Great Satan” Will Not Absolve Iran Mr. Zarif By Dr. Majid Rafizadeh [email protected] The more the west and the world reaches out to Iran in an attempt to reintroduce it to the international community, the more Iran finds itself under pressure at home to sustain its revolution, a revolution that is built around creating and fighting off great “Satanic” enemies, be they real or imagined, in order to sustain its theocratic legitimacy. The effects of this pressure is reflected by Iran’s antagonistic and belligerent behavior since the signing of the Nuclear deal, where they have on numerous occasion harassed US patrols (to the extent that US warships had to fire warning shots towards revolutionary guard warships), to holding US sailors hostage and embarrassing the US government, to the continuous inflammatory and contradictory remarks made by Khamenei and his inner circle against the west and the Unites States, all of which is meant to sustain the hatred and fanaticism that fuel the legitimacy of the Iranian theocracy and “the revolution” that is being exported regionally at an unprecedented level, leaving exceptional carnage and destruction in its wake. The United States of America, better known in Iran as the “Great Satan”, the quintessential bogyman, and according to the Iranian theocracy the global patron of global terrorism, has served Iran very well in the past. It provided the all-encompassing enemy that could be blamed for all Iran’s ills and failures to the Iranian people, while providing the “religiously cloaked” narrative that fueled regional recruitment of militias based on religious and sectarian ideals as part of a divine holy mission to defeat this Great Satan; be it in Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Shia militias in Iraq, Syria, and Yemen, in addition to breeding sectarian hate in the Kingdom of Bahrain and elsewhere.
    [Show full text]
  • Martin Amis on the Beginning of the End for Iran's Ayatollahs | World News | the Guardian
    Martin Amis on the beginning of the end for Iran's ayatollahs | World news | The Guardian Martin Amis: The end of Iran's ayatollahs? In 1979, the return to Iran of an exiled cleric marked the start of the Islamic Republic. The death in June of Neda Soltan may herald the long-overdue fall of this moribund regime Martin Amis The Guardian, Friday 17 July 2009 larger | smaller An Iranian protester during an opposition rally in Tehran on 9 July 2009 Photograph: -/AFP/Getty Images The following correction was printed in the Guardian's Corrections and clarifications column, Monday 20 July 2009 An essay exploring whether Iran's Islamic republic is in its death throes – referred to President Jimmy Carter's "failed Entebbe raid of April 1980" to rescue US hostages in Iran. The failed 1980 mission was Operation Eagle Claw. The rescue of airline passengers at Entebbe, Uganda, was carried out with almost complete success by the Israeli military in July 1976. The writer Jason Elliot called his recent and resonant Iranian travelogue Mirrors of the Unseen; and I am aware of the usual dangers associated with writing about the future. But what we seem to be witnessing in Iran is the first spasm of the death agony of the Islamic Republic. In this process, which will be very long and very ugly, Mir Hossein Mousavi is likely to play a lesser role than Neda Agha Soltan, whose transformation (from youth, hope, and beauty, in a matter of seconds, to muddy death) unforgettably crystallised the core Iranian idea – the Shia tragedy and passion – of martyrdom in the face of barbaric injustice.
    [Show full text]
  • Armed Conflict in Somalia Reviewed from Armed Conflict and Peace Mission Perspective
    International Journal of Arts and Social Science www.ijassjournal.com ISSN: 2581-7922, Volume 4 Issue 4, July-August 2021 Armed Conflict in Somalia Reviewed From Armed Conflict and Peace Mission Perspective Yoga Rosmanto1, Rivaldo Noval Putra Santosa2 1(Peace and Conflict Resolution Department, Indonesia Defense University, Indonesia) 2(Peace and Conflict Resolution Department, Indonesia Defense University, Indonesia) ABSTRACT: Somalia is a failed state that is unable to perform its security and defense functions. Military coups and uprisings could not be suppressed, instead causing international conflicts that penetrated the civilian realm. This conflict which led to violence did not discourage the warring parties to immediately stop their actions. Most of the victims who fell were civilians who did not even know what the real purpose of war was. The research methods and approaches used are qualitative and literature studies. After analyzing, the results of this study found that when viewed from the historical timeline of the conflict in Somalia, this conflict has been going on for quite a long time, from 1991 to the present. Then, referring to the type of armed conflict, the conflict in Somalia is included in the type of Non-International Armed conflict, this is based on Article 1 Additional Protocol II of the Geneva Conventions. Furthermore, the result of the conflict in Somalia has resulted in the emergence of structural violence and direct violence. Where the violence is triggered by the presence of actors who make the conflict more heated, these actors include provocateurs, functional groups, and vulnerable groups. KEYWORDS -armed conflict, civil war, type of conflict, sources of conflict, conflict actors I.
    [Show full text]
  • “Buried in the Sands of the Ogaden”: the United States, the Horn of Africa and the Demise of Detente
    “Buried in the Sands of the Ogaden”: The United States, The Horn of Africa and The Demise of Detente. Louise Prentis Woodroofe London School of Economics and Political Science PhD International History UMI Number: U615656 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615656 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Abstract The decade of the 1970s, despite representing the era of detente, superficially appeared to be one of Soviet successes and American setbacks. From Vietnam to Angola, the USSR seemed to be gaining Marxist friends in the Third World. Because of this, the Soviet Union wanted the United States to recognize it as an equal power in the world. With such acknowledgement, the Kremlin believed that negotiations to limit the arms race would then be mutually beneficial. On the other hand, President Nixon and Secretary of State Kissinger interpreted detente as a series of agreements and compromises to draw Moscow into an international system through which the United States could exercise some control over Soviet foreign relations, particularly with the Third World.
    [Show full text]
  • Mohamed Osman Omar Somaliasomalia a Nation Driven to Despair
    SOMALIA : A Nation Driven to Despair Qaran La Jah-Wareeriyay MOHAMED OSMAN OMAR SOMALIASOMALIA A NATION DRIVEN TO DESPAIR A Case of Leadership Failure SOMALI PUBLICATIONS Mogadishu 2002 SOMALIA: A NATION DRIVEN TO DESPAIR Published in 1996 Reprint 2002 SOMALI PUBLICATIONS e-mail: [email protected] mosman [email protected] © Mohamed Osman Omar, 1996 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy or any information storage and retrieval system, with- out permission in writing from the publishers. Typeset by Digigrafics, D-69 Gulmohar Park, New Delhi, 110049 Printed in India by Somali Publications at Everest Press, New Delhi Sources which have been consulted in the preparation of this book are referenced in footnotes on the appropriate text pages. Cover design: Nirmal Singh, Graphic Designer, New Delhi. Cover photo: Somalis on boat by UNHCR/P. Moumtzis-July 1992 Dedicated To The Somali People Contents Acknowledgement viii Foreword ix Preface xiii Prologue xvii After the Fall of Siad Chapter 1 Djibouti Conferences One & Two 1 Chapter 2 The Destructive War 9 Chapter 3 The World is Horror-Struck 19 Chapter 4 Attempts to End the Crisis 56 Chapter 5 Reconciliation Steps 67 Chapter 6 Addis Ababa Conference 81 Chapter 7 To Say Good-bye 109 Chapter 8 The Aftermath 142 Chapter 9 From Cairo to Nairobi 163 Chapter 10 Leadership Failure in Africa 168 Chapter 11 The African Initiative! 210 Chapter 12 Addis Ababa and Mogadishu: A Comparison 223 Chapter 13 Caught in the Fire 238 Chapter 14 Deepening the Crisis 257 Chapter 15 The Confrontation 278 Chapter 16 Conclusion 294 Songs of a Nomad Son 297 Appendices 299 Addis Ababa Agreements Interview UN Resolutions Index 379 ACKNOWLEDGMENT First and foremost I would like to express my profound gratitude to my mother, Sitey Sharif, my wife Mana Moallim, my children, my brothers and my sister for their moral support, although we are scattered, due to the difficult circumstances, in many places.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Shia Democracy': Myth Or Reality? by Sreeram Chaulia the Other Islam
    ‘Shia Democracy’: Myth or Reality? By Sreeram Chaulia The Other Islam Discussions about the democracy-deficit in the Muslim world tend to conflate Sunnis and Shias as culturally homogeneous groups. Nuances about diversity within Islam only come up related to the regional variation in practices and political institutions (e.g. Middle Eastern Islam, North African Islam, South Asian Islam, Central Asian Islam and Southeast Asian Islam).1 Some scholars make the distinction between Arab and non-Arab countries with regard to their political culture and regime type.2 The unspoken assumption in studies proving the proclivity of Muslim countries toward authoritarianism is that sectarian schisms within Islam do not matter much when it comes to attitude and receptivity to democracy. Whether there are well-delineated differences between Shias and Sunnis in the way they conceive of – and construct – political authority has not been given much serious research. This is a surprising omission in contrast to the extent to which political scientists have debated the impact of the Catholic-Protestant schism 1 The classic exposition of cross-national differences in Islam and its impact on society and politics is V.S.Naipaul’s book comparing Indonesia, Iran, Pakistan and Malaysia. Cf. 1999. Beyond Belief: Islamic Excursions Among the Converted Peoples, New York: Random House. 2 Alfred Stepan and Graeme Robertson argue that the 31 Muslim majority but non-Arab countries are over-achievers for GDP per capita levels in terms of holding competitive elections, while the 16 Arab countries are under-achievers. Cf. 2003. ‘An “Arab” More Than “Muslim” Electoral Gap’, Journal of Democracy, Volume 14, Number 3.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER = SOMALIA for the Past 20 Years, Somali President Mohamed Siad Barre Has Presided Over a One-Party Military Dictatorship
    @CHAPTER = SOMALIA For the past 20 years, Somali president Mohamed Siad Barre has presided over a one-party military dictatorship. His reign has been characterized by vicious discrimination against certain ethnic groups -- currently the Isaaqs in northern Somalia -- as well as political imprisonment, torture and summary executions, in an effort to suppress all dissent in Somalia. A long-simmering war in northern Somalia between the Somali National Movement ("SNM") and government forces erupted in May 1988 when the SNM launched military operations from Ethiopia. The army responded with a savage counterinsurgency campaign. Throughout the rest of 1988 and 1989, the Somali armed forces engaged in extensive efforts to deprive the SNM of civilian support -- members of the Isaaq clam make up most SNM combatants -- by driving Isaaq noncombatants from the country through such means as indiscriminate aerial bombardment, the widespread killings of civilians, the destruction of crops, cattle and food-storage facilities, the poisoning of wells, and the jailing of hundreds of political prisoners. Some 450,000 Somalis fled such attacks for Ethiopia, Djibouti and Kenya, and an additional 600,000 were displaced within Somalia. Until September 1989, the Bush administration's policy toward Somalia was largely a continuation of that of the Reagan administration. That policy was based on interest in the Berbera port as a strategic location -- it is viewed as an important staging area for the Indian Ocean, the Red Sea and the Persian Gulf. That interest provided the rationale to extend economic, military and diplomatic support to the U.S. ally in Mogadishu. At the same time, paradoxically, the administration went to considerable lengths to investigate the human rights situation in Somalia, and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Part H Background to the Somali War 1 Introduction
    PART H BACKGROUND TO THE SOMALI WAR 1 INTRODUCTION TO SOMALIA 1.1 The Somali People Somalia1 covers almost 640,000 square kilometres in the north-eastern tip of the Horn of Africa. In the main this is a semi-desert region, with a vegetation cover and water resources that dictate a pastoral nomadic existence for the majority of the population. The exception is the area between the two southern rivers, the Shabelle and Juba, and in valleys of the northern escarpments, where higher rainfall and richer soils provide land suitable for agriculture. r The Somali-speaking people form one of the largest ethnic groups in Africa, living dispersed throughout the Horn, from the Awash Valley, through the Ethiopian Ogaden, and into northern Kenya as far as the Tana river. A Cushitic-speaking family or 'nation' of people, Somalis belong to the Hamitic group of peoples, which includes the Afar, Oromo, Saho and Beja peoples of the Horn. The Somali are distinguished by a shared common ancestry, a single language, an Islamic (sunni) heritage and a way of life that is overwhelmingly pastoral. The Somali are divided into six 'clan families' — Dir, Issaq, Darod, Hawiye, Digil, and Rahanweyne — which are further divided, according to agnatic descent, into subsidiary clans or lineage groups (see diagram 1) (Lewis, 1961). The Somali kinship system and the flexible and shifting alliances of clan kinship groups are fundament- ally entrenched in the social, political, and economic culture of the Somali people. Until the colonial period the Somali 'nation' did not form a single political unit; any concept of political identity was based on clan affiliation.
    [Show full text]