DOCSLIB.ORG

The 2019-20 Grand Jury Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

FINAL CONSOLIDATED REPORT A Report for the Citizens of Yolo County, California Arcade Arroz Beatrice Brooks Browns Corner Cadenasso Capay Central 2019-20 Yolo County Citrona Kiesel Clarksburg Kings Farms Conaway Knights Landing Grand Jury Coniston Lovdal Daisie Lund Davis Madison Tancred Dufour Merritt Tyndall Landing Dunnigan Monument Hills University of California Davis El Macero Norton Valdez El Rio Villa Peethill Vin Esparto Plainfield Webster Fremont Riverview West Sacramento Green Rumsey Willow Point Greendale Saxon Winters Guinda Sorroca Woodland September 24, 2020 Hershey Sugarfield Yolo Jacobs Corner Swingle Zamora Woodland, California 2019-2020 YOLO COUNTY GRAND JURY FINAL CONSOLIDATED REPORT A Report for the Citizens of Yolo County, California September 24, 2020 Woodland, California i Acknowledgements Special thanks to jurors Lisa DeSanti, Ann Kokalis, Richard Kruger, Sherwin Lee, Lynn Otani, and Laurel Sousa for their extra time and effort in performing important officer duties during our term. Thanks also to all the jurors during our tenure who gathered information, contributed to the writing of the various individual committee reports, and worked the many hours required for thorough investigations. Cover Art by Judy Wohlfrom, 2017-2018 Foreperson ii Table of Contents Acknowledgements .......................................................................................... ii Honorable Sonia Cortés .................................................................................... vi The 2019-2020 Yolo County Grand Jury ......................................................... vii About The Grand Jury ..................................................................................... viii Investigations .................................................................................................. 1 Monitoring Compliance with 2017-2018 Yolo County Grand Jury Recommendations Summary ......................................................................................................... 2 Discussion ....................................................................................................... 4 Findings .......................................................................................................... 17 Recommendations ........................................................................................... 17 Every School is Vulnerable: Staff and Students Must Feel Safe for Learning to Occur Summary ......................................................................................................... 21 Discussion ....................................................................................................... 23 Findings .......................................................................................................... 28 Recommendations ........................................................................................... 29 Reorganization of the Public Guardian and Public Administrator: Needed Change and Continuing Challenges Summary ......................................................................................................... 34 Discussion ....................................................................................................... 37 Findings .......................................................................................................... 43 Recommendations ........................................................................................... 44 The Hawk, the Beetle, and the Budget: An Evaluation of the Approved Yolo Habitat Conservation Plan in its First 16 Months Summary ......................................................................................................... 51 Discussion ....................................................................................................... 55 Findings .......................................................................................................... 66 Recommendations ........................................................................................... 67 Election Security in Yolo County Summary ......................................................................................................... 74 Discussion ....................................................................................................... 78 Findings .......................................................................................................... 89 Recommendations ........................................................................................... 90 iii The Davis Police Accountability Commission, SB 1421, and Residual Questions from the Picnic Day 2017 Incident Summary ......................................................................................................... 93 Discussion ....................................................................................................... 99 Findings .......................................................................................................... 117 Recommendations ........................................................................................... 119 Striving to Make a Difference: Responses to the 2018-2019 Yolo County Grand Jury Report .................... 134 Flood Management in the Urban Environment – Yolo LAFCo and the Role of Reclamation Districts 537 and 900 within the City of West Sacramento .................................................................................. 135 Missed Funding Opportunities: West Sacramento Flood Control Projects ....... 140 Health and Human Services: The Drug Medi-Cal Organized Delivery 143 System – A Watershed Moment ........................................................................ 143 Sci-Tech Academy: A Model For The Future? ................................................. 144 Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) Report: ORR Places Youth In Yolo County Detention – What Can Be Improved? ........................................... 145 iv v GRAND JURY County of Yolo P.O. Box 2142 Woodland, California 95776 Honorable Sonia Cortés Judge, Superior Court of California 1000 Main Street Woodland, CA 95776 Dear Judge Cortés, The 2019-2020 Yolo County Grand Jury is honored to prepare and present our Final Consolidated Report to you and to the citizens of Yolo County. In early March 2020, the Grand Jury ceased meeting in person and went to remote meetings and interviews due to COVID-19. In May 2020, with consultation from the Court, the Yolo County Board of Supervisors voted to extend our term from June 30, 2020 to December 31, 2020. This unprecedented extension allowed the Grand Jury time to finish our investigations and reports under these challenging circumstances. The Grand Jury received and reviewed 19 citizen complaints. Of those complaints, four were referred to the different Grand Jury Committees, and two were declined. Due to the timing of some submitted complaints, five are being forwarded to the incoming Grand Jury so the complaints may receive adequate review and investigation. The Grand Jury inspected the Yolo County Monroe Detention Facility (Women’s section) as stipulated by the California Penal Code. In its Final Consolidated Report, the Grand Jury presents six reports based on investigations initiated by the Grand Jury, and one based on citizen complaints. The 2019-2020 Yolo County Grand Jury is composed of a diverse group of selfless volunteers from throughout the county. The Final Consolidated Report represents the commitment and hard work of the Jurors, who were dedicated to finding the truth and improving the county community. I personally wish to express my sincere gratitude and admiration to all those who applied their various skills and interests in accomplishing this task. The Grand Jury appreciates and thanks all the Yolo County employees and officials, as well as those in Jury Services, providing us with outstanding support and guidance throughout the process. It has been our honor and privilege to serve the citizens of Yolo County. Leslie Field Leslie Field, Foreperson 2019-2020 Yolo County Grand Jury vi The 2019-2020 Yolo County Grand Jury Leslie Field, Foreperson ~ Davis Lynn Otani, Foreperson Pro Tem ~ West Sacramento John Arnold ~ Davis Lisa DeSanti ~ Davis Lisa Klotz ~ Davis Ann Kokalis ~ Davis Richard Kruger ~ Davis Sherwin Lee ~ Davis James McFarland ~ Davis Mohamed Sidahmed ~ Davis Laurel Sousa ~ Davis Alan Uota ~ Davis Rick von Geldern ~ Winters We also wish to thank those members who were unable to complete their volunteer service ~ Charlene Chick, Catherine Doherty-Handy, Adam Gardizi, Clayton Morgan, Janice Palmer, Melesio Perez, Eli Richman, Jonathan Rothman, Joe Sanchez, Stuart Williams, Enas Wilson, and Audrey Ybarra vii ABOUT THE GRAND JURY The United States Constitution’s Fifth Amendment and the California Constitution require that each county appoint a Grand Jury to guard the public interest by monitoring local government. Per California Penal Code Section (§) 888, the Yolo County Superior Court appoints 19 Grand Jurors each year from a pool of volunteers. These Yolo County citizens, with diverse and varied backgrounds, serve their community as Grand Jurors from July 1st to June 30th. The Yolo County Grand Jury is an official, independent body of the court, not answerable to administrators or to the Board of Supervisors. FUNCTION The California Grand Jury has three basic functions: to weigh criminal charges and determine whether indictments should be returned (Penal Code §917); to weigh allegations of misconduct
Recommended publications
  • Yolo County Cannabis Land Use Ordinance Draft Environmental

    Yolo County Cannabis Land Use Ordinance Draft Environmental

    Ascent Environmental Cultural Resources 3.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES This section analyzes and evaluates the potential impacts of the project on known and unknown cultural resources as a result of adoption and implementation of the proposed CLUO, including issuance of subsequent Cannabis Use Permits pursuant to the adopted CLUO. Cultural resources include districts, sites, buildings, structures, or objects generally older than 50 years and considered to be important to a culture, subculture, or community for scientific, traditional, religious, or other reasons. They include prehistoric resources, historic-era resources, and tribal cultural resources (the latter as defined by AB 52, Statutes of 2014, in PRC Section 21074). This section also analyzes archaeological, historical, and tribal cultural resources. Paleontological resources are discussed in Section 3.7, “Geology and Soils.” Archaeological resources are locations where human activity has measurably altered the earth or left deposits of prehistoric or historic-era physical remains (e.g., stone tools, bottles, former roads, house foundations). Historical (or architectural or built environment) resources include standing buildings (e.g., houses, barns, outbuildings, cabins), intact structures (e.g., dams, bridges, wells), or other remains of human’s alteration of the environment (e.g., foundation pads, remnants of rock walls). Tribal cultural resources were added as a distinct resource subject to review under CEQA, effective January 1, 2015, under AB 52. Tribal cultural resources are sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American tribe that are either included or determined to be eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) or local registers of historical resources.
  • Final Report

    Final Report

    2011 – 2012 Yolo COUnty GranD JUryP FINAL REPORT A Report for the Citizens of Yolo County, California Grand Jury June 30, 2012 Woodland, California 2011–2012 YOLO COUNTY GRAND JUry FINAL REPORT 2 2011–2012 YOLO COUNTY GRAND JUry FINAL REPORT Table of Contents Letter from Yolo County Grand Jury Foreperson . 5 2011–2012 Yolo County Grand Jury Members . 6 About the Grand Jury . 7–8 Investigations & Reviews . 9–30 Yolo County Jail, 9–12 Yolo County Juvenile Detention Facility, 13–15 Yolo County Probation Department, 16–19 Dunnigan Fire Protection District, 20–22 Yolo County Adult Literacy Program, 23–25 Yolo County Workforce Investment Board, 26–29 Appendix . 31–80 Responses to the 2010–2011 Grand Jury Report, 31 Yolo County Department of Employment and Social Services, 33–36 City of Woodland Fire Department, 37–44 Washington Unified School District, 45–48 Esparto Community Services District, 49–54 City of Davis Affordable Housing Program, 55–58 Winters Joint Unified School District, 59–70 Responses to the 2011–2012 Grand Jury Report, 71 Dunnigan Fire Protection District, 73–80 3 2011–2012 YOLO COUNTY GRAND JUry FINAL REPORT Grand Jury 4 2011–2012 YOLO COUNTY GRAND JUry FINAL REPORT GRAND JURY County of Yolo P.O. Box 2142 Woodland, CA 95776 June 29, 2012 The Honorable David W. Reed Advising Judge to the Grand Jury Superior Court of California, County of Yolo 725 Court Street Woodland, CA 95695 Dear Judge Reed, The 2011-2012 Yolo County Grand Jury is pleased to present to you and the citizens of Yolo County our Comprehensive Final Report.
  • Cultural, Paleontological, and Tribal Cultural Resources

    Cultural, Paleontological, and Tribal Cultural Resources

    Chapter 7—Cultural, Paleontological, and Tribal Cultural Resources 7.1 Introduction This chapter describes the existing conditions (environmental and regulatory) and assesses the potential cultural, paleontological, and tribal resources impacts of the 2020 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (proposed MTP/SCS). Where necessary and feasible, mitigation measures are identified to reduce these impacts. The information presented in this chapter is based on review of existing and available information and is regional in scope. Data, analysis, and findings provided in this chapter were considered and prepared at a programmatic level. For consistency with the 2016 MTP/SCS EIR, paleontological resources are addressed in this chapter even though these resources are grouped with geology and soils in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines (SACOG 2016). Impacts to unique geologic features are addressed in Chapter 9 – Geology, Soils, Seismicity, and Mineral Resources. Cultural resources include archaeological sites or districts of prehistoric or historic origin, built environment resources older than 50 years (e.g., historic buildings, structures, features, objects, districts, and landscapes), and traditional or ethnographic resources, including tribal cultural resources, which are a separate category of cultural resources under CEQA. Paleontological resources include mineralized, partially mineralized, or unmineralized bones and teeth, soft tissues, shells, wood, leaf impressions, footprints, burrows, and microscopic remains that are more than 5,000 years old and occur mainly in Pleistocene or older sedimentary rock units. In response to the Notice of Preparation (NOP), SACOG received comments related to cultural and tribal cultural resources from the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) and United Auburn Indian Community of the Auburn Rancheria.
  • The Politics of Urban Cultural Policy Global

    The Politics of Urban Cultural Policy Global

    THE POLITICS OF URBAN CULTURAL POLICY GLOBAL PERSPECTIVES Carl Grodach and Daniel Silver 2012 CONTENTS List of Figures and Tables iv Contributors v Acknowledgements viii INTRODUCTION Urbanizing Cultural Policy 1 Carl Grodach and Daniel Silver Part I URBAN CULTURAL POLICY AS AN OBJECT OF GOVERNANCE 20 1. A Different Class: Politics and Culture in London 21 Kate Oakley 2. Chicago from the Political Machine to the Entertainment Machine 42 Terry Nichols Clark and Daniel Silver 3. Brecht in Bogotá: How Cultural Policy Transformed a Clientist Political Culture 66 Eleonora Pasotti 4. Notes of Discord: Urban Cultural Policy in the Confrontational City 86 Arie Romein and Jan Jacob Trip 5. Cultural Policy and the State of Urban Development in the Capital of South Korea 111 Jong Youl Lee and Chad Anderson Part II REWRITING THE CREATIVE CITY SCRIPT 130 6. Creativity and Urban Regeneration: The Role of La Tohu and the Cirque du Soleil in the Saint-Michel Neighborhood in Montreal 131 Deborah Leslie and Norma Rantisi 7. City Image and the Politics of Music Policy in the “Live Music Capital of the World” 156 Carl Grodach ii 8. “To Have and to Need”: Reorganizing Cultural Policy as Panacea for 176 Berlin’s Urban and Economic Woes Doreen Jakob 9. Urban Cultural Policy, City Size, and Proximity 195 Chris Gibson and Gordon Waitt Part III THE IMPLICATIONS OF URBAN CULTURAL POLICY AGENDAS FOR CREATIVE PRODUCTION 221 10. The New Cultural Economy and its Discontents: Governance Innovation and Policy Disjuncture in Vancouver 222 Tom Hutton and Catherine Murray 11. Creating Urban Spaces for Culture, Heritage, and the Arts in Singapore: Balancing Policy-Led Development and Organic Growth 245 Lily Kong 12.
  • YOLO COUNTY HISTORIC COURTHOUSE DUE DILIGENCE REPORT Page | 1 012383 | June 5, 2013

    YOLO COUNTY HISTORIC COURTHOUSE DUE DILIGENCE REPORT Page | 1 012383 | June 5, 2013

    TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS SECTION 2 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. Page 4 SECTION 3 ASSESSMENTS .............................................................................................................................. Page 6 SECTION 4 APPENDIX A - PLANS ................................................................................................................. Page 20 APPENDIX B - SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR’S STANDARDS FOR REHABILITATION .... Page 23 APPENDIX C - PHOTOGRAPHS ................................................................................................. Page 25 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study was prepared by Lionakis in collaboration with the Yolo County Administration Office the Yolo County Facilities Division, and with input and assistance from the consultant team listed below. PREPARED FOR: Yolo County Administration Office 625 Court Street, Room 202 Woodland, CA 95695 ARCHITECT: Lionakis 1919 19TH Street Sacramento, CA 958181 (916) 558-1900 Contact: Mike Davey CONSULTANTS HISTORICAL STRUCTURAL ARG Lionakis Pier 9, The Embarcadero, 191 19th Street Suite 107 1 (916) 558-1900 1 (415) 421-1680 Contact: Bill Anders Contact: Aaron Hyland MECHANICAL/PLUMBING ELECTRICAL Glumac Glumac 910 Glenn Drive 910 Glenn Drive 1 (916) 934-5103 1 (916) 934-5103 Contact:
  • Final Report

    Final Report

    FINAL REPORT A Report for the Citizens of Yolo County, California Arcade Arroz Beatrice Brooks Browns Corner Cadenasso Capay 2017-18 Yolo County Central Citrona Kiesel Clarksburg Kings Farms Grand Jury Conaway Knights Landing Coniston Lovdal Daisie Lund Davis Madison Tancred Dufour Merritt Tyndall Landing Dunnigan Monument Hills University of California Davis El Macero Norton Valdez El Rio Villa Peethill Vin Esparto Plainfield Webster Fremont Riverview West Sacramento Green Rumsey Willow Point Greendale Saxon Winters Guinda Sorroca Woodland Hershey Sugarfield Yolo June 30, 2018 Jacobs Corner Swingle Zamora Woodland, California 2017-2018 YOLO COUNTY GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT A Report for the Citizens of Yolo County, California June 30, 2018 Woodland, California Acknowledgements Thanks to Judy Wohlfrom, 2017-18 Foreperson of the Yolo County Grand Jury, for her excellent leadership and the beautiful original artwork on the cover of this report. Thanks also to jurors Phillip Shaver, Brian Scaccia, Claudia Morain, Lynn DeLapp, and Geoffrey Engel for their extra effort in bringing the final report to completion. Thanks to all of the other jurors who gathered information all year and contributed to writing the various specific reports. 2017-2018 Yolo County Grand Jury i Table of Contents PAGE Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................... i Letter from Foreperson Judy Wohlfrom to Honorable David W. Reed .................... vi The 2017-2018 Yolo County Grand Jury ..................................................................
  • 6Healthy Community Element

    6Healthy Community Element

    HEALTHY COMMUNITY 6 ELEMENT CITY OF WOODLAND GENERAL PLAN 2035 6.1 Introduction and Purpose The City of Woodland is embracing the opportunity to bring health-related perspectives to long-range planning with the Healthy Community Element. This Element is centered on the concept that the health of the community is a direct reflection of the health of the residents living within the community. The Element reviews current health conditions in Woodland and sets forth goals and policies to promote the individual and collective health of those living in Woodland, particularly pertaining to access to medical and health services and facilities, active lifestyles, healthy food, commu- nity services, and arts and culture. The Woodland Public Library offers a story time for children. HC 6-2 HEALTHY COMMUNITY ELEMENT 6 The Healthy Community Element is organized as follows: • Section 6.1: Introduction and Purpose. Introduces the topics covered in this Element and outlines the Element’s rela- tionship to State law and the Visioning Statement and Guiding Principles. It also defines what healthy community means for Woodland. • Section 6.2: Physical Health and Environmental Jus- tice. Discusses physical health conditions in Woodland; access to medical and health facilities and services; and environmental justice as it relates to health. • Section 6.3: Active Lifestyles. Presents information related to current physical activity levels in Woodland and promotes opportunities and improvements related to an active lifestyle for the Woodland community. • Section 6.4: Healthy Food. Discusses current nutrition data in the Woodland community. Promotes access to healthy foods and urban agriculture in Woodland. • Section 6.5: Community Facilities and Services.
  • West Portland

    West Portland

    Happy Holidays december 09 VOLUME 24, ISSUE 4 FREE Serving Portland’s Northwest Neighborhoods since 1986 The urban renewal question Does spiking growth, adding public projects, the question in terms of whether urban renewal would advance the association’s long-established goals, spelled out in the 240’ outweigh the burdens of density? 2003 Northwest District Plan. Height “We have a plan already,” Limit said NWDA Secre- tary Steve Pinger. “If a URA helps Code-compliant option us reach that goal, great.” 6:1 FAR* He asks this question: “Does urban renewal help achieve things that the market wouldn’t, and is that enough of a Pettygrove reason to bring it into being? … If all we’re doing is accelerating the 3:1 FAR* development process, is 65’ NW 21st that a good thing?” Height Since the idea of a Limit new urban renewal area was first floated early Pettygrove proposed concept option in the year, Northwest neighborhood activists have been highly critical of the whole concept, NW 21st Urban renewal will have a substantial bearing on whether the Con- *FAr= from its excesses and floor-area ratio way area develops to the level envisioned by the Northwest District inequities to its unpre- Plan (left) or to perhaps twice that density, as intended by Con-way dictability. One board itself. (The company, which prepared these renderings, recently revised member likened the sys- its position and is no longer circulating the image at right.) tem to pigs feeding at a trough. By allan Classen President Juliet Hyams. “However, it could uation committee created by the Portland But when pushed to take a firm either/ also invite development that does not Development Commission to consider if or position, most neighborhood represen- he siren song of urban renewal fit the character of the neighborhood.
  • The Plumed Serpant

    The Plumed Serpant

    The Plumed Serpant D H Lawrence Chapter 1 - Beginnings Of A Bull-Fight It was the Sunday after Easter, and the last bull-fight of the season in Mexico City. Four special bulls had been brought over from Spain for the occasion, since Spanish bulls are more fiery than Mexican. Perhaps it is the altitude, perhaps just the spirit of the western Continent which is to blame for the lack of 'pep', as Owen put it, in the native animal. Although Owen, who was a great socialist, disapproved of bull- fights, 'We have never seen one. We shall have to go,' he said. 'Oh yes, I think we must see it,' said Kate. 'And it's our last chance,' said Owen. Away he rushed to the place where they sold tickets, to book seats, and Kate went with him. As she came into the street, her heart sank. It was as if some little person inside her were sulking and resisting. Neither she nor Owen spoke much Spanish, there was a fluster at the ticket place, and an unpleasant individual came forward to talk American for them. It was obvious they ought to buy tickets for the 'Shade.' But they wanted to economize, and Owen said he preferred to sit among the crowd, therefore, against the resistance of the ticket man and the onlookers, they bought reserved seats in the 'Sun.' The show was on Sunday afternoon. All the tram-cars and the frightful little Ford omnibuses called camions were labelled Torero, and were surging away towards Chapultepec. Kate felt that sudden dark feeling, that she didn't want to go.
  • EXPOSE YOURSELF to ART Towards a Critical Epistemology of Embarrassment

    EXPOSE YOURSELF to ART Towards a Critical Epistemology of Embarrassment

    EXPOSE YOURSELF TO ART Towards a Critical Epistemology of Embarrassment Gwyneth Siobhan Jones Goldsmiths University of London PhD Thesis 2013 1 I declare that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Gwyneth Siobhan Jones 2 ABSTRACT This thesis investigates the negative affect of ‘spectatorial embarrassment’, a feeling of exposure and discomfort sometimes experienced when looking at art. Two particular characteristics of embarrassment figure in the methodology and the outcome of this enquiry; firstly that embarrassment is marginal, of little orthodox value, and secondly, it is a personal experience of aversive self-consciousness. The experiential nature of embarrassment has been adopted throughout as a methodology and the embarrassments analysed are, for the most part, my own and based on ‘true’ experience. Precedent for this is drawn from ‘anecdotal theory’, which uses event and occasion in the origination of a counter-theory that values minor narratives of personal experience in place of the generalising and abstract tendencies of theory-proper. The context is a series of encounters with artworks by Gilbert & George, Jemima Stehli, Franko B, Adrian Howells, and Sarah Lucas. They are connected by their contemporaneity, their ‘British-ness’, and that they allow the spectator no comfortable position to look from. This enquiry engages with theories of ‘the gaze’ (as both aesthetic disinterest and a dubious sign of cultural competence) and the challenge to aesthetic disinterest made by ‘transgressive art’ which may provoke a more engaged, even embodied response. Each encounter sparks consideration of differing causes and outcomes of embarrassment that resonate beyond art to broader sociocultural territories particularly in terms of gender and class.
  • Appendix A: Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties

    Appendix A: Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties

    A Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties Appendix A: Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties Table of Contents A.1 Early Notification Announcement A-1 A.1.1 Early Notification Letter, December 4, 2012 ................................................................................ A-3 A.1.2 Legal Notice Publication, December 9, 2012 ............................................................................. A-13 A.1.3 Comments .................................................................................................................................. A-19 A.2 Project Information Meetings A-35 A.2.1 Project Meeting Notification Letters, August 27, 2013 ............................................................... A-37 A.2.2 Dates, Locations and Attendance .............................................................................................. A-57 A.2.3 Comments .................................................................................................................................. A-59 A.3 Section 106 Consultation A-65 A.3.1 Section 106 Consultation Letters, November 2013 ................................................................... A-67 A.3.2 Comments from the November 2013 Letters ........................................................................... A-107 A.3.3 Section 106 Consultation Letters, April 8, 2014 ....................................................................... A-115 A.3.4 Section 106 Concurrence Letters............................................................................................
  • Planning Context of the Street and Dead Cat Alley

    Planning Context of the Street and Dead Cat Alley

    22 PPllaannnniinngg CCoonntteexxtt n order to prepare an effective plan for Wyckoff built a small wooden store near the Downtown area, it is vital to what is now the southeast corner of First Iunderstand the planning context of the Street and Dead Cat Alley. Wycoff built a area. The following sections provide an second store located at the corner of Sixth overview of the Downtown organized and Court Streets. Wyckoff named his under the following headings: general store "Yolo City." It became a stopping point for travelers riding through § History the small village on the trail heading north along the west side of the valley or on the § Economic development trail heading east to Sacramento. Yolo § Housing City also served pioneer farmers who began settling in Yolo County. § Circulation § Infrastructure § Environmental resources § Policy framework Information on existing land use within the Downtown area is provided in Chapter 3, “Land Use and Development.” 2.1 HISTORY Freeman House The City of Woodland has a strong historic Franklin S. Freeman, the founder of the heritage, which is reflected in an City of Woodland, first settled in Yolo impressive stock of historic buildings in its County, north of Cache Creek, in 1850. Downtown area and surrounding In 1857, Freeman purchased the two neighborhoods. Woodland area stores owned by Henry Wyckoff. He built agricultural is largely responsible for the a simple wooden house just north of the community's distinct identity and still plays store (still standing) and also acquired 160 and important economic role in acres of land which he envisioned Woodland. becoming a prosperous town.