DOCSLIB.ORG

Operations Security for Patriot Units to Successfully Accomplish Their

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Operations Security for Patriot Units to Successfully Accomplish Their CHAPTER 8 Operations Security For Patriot units to successfully accomplish their mission on the air-land battlefield, information about friendly unit activities, plans, and operations must be denied to enemy forces until it is too late for these forces to effectively react. Operations security (OPSEC) and ADA survivability are synonymous for all practical purposes. Generally, OPSEC includes the coordinated application of a wide range of techniques and procedures to deny information to an enemy. It is primarily common sense systematically applied to a unit's situation and mission. Coun- tersuppression actions are taken to protect friendly operations from attack. OPSEC and countersuppression actions and procedures fall into four catego- ries, the first three of which are OPSEC areas: * Countersurveillance - action to protect the true status of friendly operations. * Countermeasures -actions to remove or reduce the enemy intelligence and electronic warfare threat. * Deception - actions to create a false picture of friendly activities and operations. * Countersuppression - actions taken to directly defend or enhance the defensive capability of the unit. CONTENTS page page Section I - COUNTERSURVEILLANCE Section III - DECEPTION AREAS OF COUNTERSURVEILLANCE ..... 8-2 DECEPTION OPERATIONS ............... 8-10 8-10 STANDINGOPERATING PROCEDURES ... 8-6 DUMMY POSITIONS...................... DECOYS ... ... ....................... 8-11 Section II - COUNTERMEASURES Section IV - COUNTERSUPPRESSION MOVEMENT..8-9STINGER AND SMALL ARMS FIRES...... 8-11 RADAR EMISSION CONTROL ............. 8-9 NBC DEFENSE TECHNIQUES.............8-12 8-1 FM 44-15 Section I - COUNTERSURVEILLANCE AREAS OF COUNTERSURVEILLANCE Measures and actions in this subcate- the KG-27 used with the AN/GRC-103 UHF gory are those takei to prevent location of the radio, and the VINSON family of speech unit by visual, electronic, or photographic secure devices. means. Countersurveillance encompasses the following four areas: This equipment sends an unintelligible signal to receivers not having the same equip- 1. Signal security (SIGSEC). ment. If the enemy has a limited SIGINT capacity, monitoring these secure nets will 2. Electronic counter-countermeasures. probably be of lower priority than nets oper- 3. Information security. ating in the clear. 4. Physical security. These secured radio nets allow easy, rapid communications and are not as vulner- Countersurveillance measures comprise able to certain forms of electronic counter- the bulk of the actions available to the unit measures. To maintain secure nets, it is commander when incorporating OPSEC into essential that proper encryption codes and his operations. authenticators are used. Codes are changed SIGNAL SECURITY regularly as prescribed. Signal security encompasses actions units can use to minimize enemy interception and Transmission Security. When using direc- analysis of radar and radio signals. Catego- tional antennas (dipole, flyswatter, dish), ries of SIGSEC are electronic security units should position antennas to keep trans- (ELSEC), communications security, and mission lobes from facing directly toward the TEMPEST. enemy. This will decrease vulnerability to ESM and ECM. Whenever possible, emplace Electronic Security equipment where terrain will mask transmit- ELSEC is the protection of transmis- ters from the enemy. sions from noncommunication devices. It includes measures such as approved operat- Emission Security. Brevity is also one of ing procedures, proper siting techniques, the keys to COMSEC. Unless a need exists to maintenance procedures, and training pro- transmit, radios should remain silent. Neces- grams. Radar emission control is the princi- sary AM and FM transmissions should be pal ELSEC measure and is addressed in sec- kept short, 20-30 seconds to include short tion II. concise RATT messages. As much reporting as is tactically feasible should be transmitted (Ccmriunications Security via written reports and courier. The remainder COM()SEDrinc udes meas ires taken to should be channelled into the UHF system deny the nem info:mation from friendly because that system normally operates 24 comm oic.ltions.tu This includeb crypto secur- hours a day. ity, trar smissicn security, emission security, physical security of COMSEC information, Physical Security of COMSEC Informa- and mE asulres to ir_ sure the authenticity of tion. COMSEC materials must be very closely commuylicati< n .. controlled. Limited dissemination is very important. Generally, radio operators should Crypto Security. Crypto security centers on not have more than two or three changes of the use ar d cor trol of speech secure equip- secure codes. If operations lend themselves to ment and codes. This equipment currently closer control, the new codes should be issued consists of buik encryption devices, such as on an "as. needed" basis. 8-2 FM 44-15 Additionally, physical security of radio or away from enemy forces. This will reduce encryption equipment is of great importance. their vulnerability to jamming and detection. If a properly coded KY-57, for example, fell into enemy hands, the enemy would have Power Levels access to the most sensitive unit communica- Sometimes it is possible to burn through tions. Therefore, speech secure devices should ECM by stepping up the power of the trans- be guarded much the same as classified mitter. To preserve this option, always oper- paper; properly stored, accounted for, and ate on the lowest power level that will suffice. used. This will also reduce the range at which the Authenticity of Communications. In cases threat can detect Patriot transmissions. when secure nets are not available, tactical Antennas operations (TACOPS) codes must be used. To Radar antennas prove are directional by design, authenticity of clear text messages, as are certain radio antennas. Directional authentication tables are required. It is radio antennas should be used whenever imperative that all radio transmissions be possible. They will also channelize the signal secured or authenticated. and have the effect of boosting the radiated power in the desired direction. TEMPEST Hazards This addresses those SIGSEC considera- INFORMATION SECURITY tions that are less obvious. For example, radios and telephones may "leak" transmis- Compromise of information security is the primary means sions, known as TEMPEST hazards. If radio- whereby enemy forces receive the bulk of frequency shielding of radio and command their intelligence. Some sources are lost documents, classified waste shelters (ECS, CRG, and ICC) is damaged, improperly disposed, passing sensitive infor- the unit may be transmitting in directions mation in the clear, discussing classified that are unplanned. Another common matters in unsecured areas, TEMPEST hazard is collocating secured and generally wirelines with nonsecured ones. These lines failing to follow proper plans and procedures. must have, as a minimum, a 6-foot separation. Control ELECTRONIC COUNTER- The most important area is document COUNTERMEASURES control. Not only do documents contain a Electronic counter-countermeasures are wealth of information, but, in addition, their taken to protect friendly electronic emitters compromise almost always affects more than from enemy detection, location, and identifi- one organization. cation. ECCM, in this OPSEC context, Considerations Two things to consider in includes use of proper power settings, antenna document control are administrative control siting, masking and remoting radio anten- and physical security. Administrative con- nas, equipment checks for radiation leakage, trol is the use of access rosters and classifica- and proper training. tion markings. Physical security is the pro- tection of documents during storage, use, and Siting transportation. Units should attempt to emplace the radar set and radio antennas so that side and Dissemination. Custodians should verify backlobes are absorbed or blocked. If this is clearances and the need-to-know of everyone not possible, try to orient these lobes parallel requesting access to classified information. 8-3 FM 44-15 Only the minimum information necessary to certain addition procedures should be imple- the mission should be extracted or distrib- mented as the conditions are not always the uted to verified using personnel. same. Denial. Units must always be prepared to Storage. In many cases, regular four-drawer deny their classified material to enemy safes are too heavy to transport or are unavail- forces. Measures range from simple evacua- able. Usually, field safes or field filing cabi- tion to the destruction of materials. Since nets are used. These containers are generally rapid destruction may become necessary, too small for the number of documents in a documents should be maintained in central Patriot unit. Additionally, a field filing cabinet storage facilities. If documents and equip- is not secure. Therefore, documents should be ment must be destroyed use document de- kept in a continually manned location (CP, stroyers and thermite grenades. Document staff operations vans). destroyers are placed in file drawers while Classified waste. These papers (carbons, thermite may be placed on the outside of the typewriter ribbon, extra or superceded mate- container. It is better to overuse flame devices rial) must be securely stored until destroyed. than to leave classified materials for the It is recommended that this material be enemy. burned daily. Field Security Procedures Site Police. A thorough clean up of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Steganography As a Means of Attacking Information Systems
    Scientific and Practical Cyber Security Journal (SPCSJ) 2(4): 75-80 ISSN 2587-4667 Scientific Cyber Security Association (SCSA) STEGANOGRAPHY AS A MEANS OF ATTACKING INFORMATION SYSTEMS Anna Romanova 1, Sergiy Toliupa 2 1Taras Shevchenko University of Kyiv, Faculty of Information Technology, 2 Taras Shevchenko University of Kyiv, Faculty of Information Technology ABSTRACT. An analysis of steganography methods that are can be potentially used as instruments in attacks on information and communication systems is presented. The possible solutions to ensure resilience to such attacks are presented. Keywords: steganography, TEMPEST, covert channel, information protection Cryptography is widely used as one of the most efficient and approbated methods of critical information resources protection. Nevertheless, in particular cases it might be more effective to hide the communication channel itself instead of making the information within it unreadable. Such a practice, namely concealing data within unsuspicious, innocent-looking containers, is called steganography. Any concept might have a double application. While being primarily considered a means of information protection, steganography can be used with ill intentions, as well. In fact, several high-tech attacks are based on the hidden data transmission, and contemporary methods of counteraction do not provide satisfactory level of resilience to those. These attacks are not always considered to be steganography-based, as they, for the most part, use a variety of features, characteristic for information and communication systems – physical effects, transmission protocols, communication infrastructure, specific features of software, cryptography etc. Nevertheless, the attack requires a classical statement of the task of steganography – how to transmit data so that a potential attacker could not acquire them due to not knowing about the presence of a transmission channel, even if he or she has a suspicion about one and the possible methods are known.
    [Show full text]
  • NSA's Efforts to Secure Private-Sector Telecommunications Infrastructure
    Under the Radar: NSA’s Efforts to Secure Private-Sector Telecommunications Infrastructure Susan Landau* INTRODUCTION When Google discovered that intruders were accessing certain Gmail ac- counts and stealing intellectual property,1 the company turned to the National Security Agency (NSA) for help in securing its systems. For a company that had faced accusations of violating user privacy, to ask for help from the agency that had been wiretapping Americans without warrants appeared decidedly odd, and Google came under a great deal of criticism. Google had approached a number of federal agencies for help on its problem; press reports focused on the company’s approach to the NSA. Google’s was the sensible approach. Not only was NSA the sole government agency with the necessary expertise to aid the company after its systems had been exploited, it was also the right agency to be doing so. That seems especially ironic in light of the recent revelations by Edward Snowden over the extent of NSA surveillance, including, apparently, Google inter-data-center communications.2 The NSA has always had two functions: the well-known one of signals intelligence, known in the trade as SIGINT, and the lesser known one of communications security or COMSEC. The former became the subject of novels, histories of the agency, and legend. The latter has garnered much less attention. One example of the myriad one could pick is David Kahn’s seminal book on cryptography, The Codebreakers: The Comprehensive History of Secret Communication from Ancient Times to the Internet.3 It devotes fifty pages to NSA and SIGINT and only ten pages to NSA and COMSEC.
    [Show full text]
  • Prism Vol. 9, No. 2 Prism About Vol
    2 021 PRISMVOL. 9, NO. 2 | 2021 PRISM VOL. 9, NO. 2 NO. 9, VOL. THE JOURNAL OF COMPLEX OPER ATIONS PRISM ABOUT VOL. 9, NO. 2, 2021 PRISM, the quarterly journal of complex operations published at National Defense University (NDU), aims to illuminate and provoke debate on whole-of-government EDITOR IN CHIEF efforts to conduct reconstruction, stabilization, counterinsurgency, and irregular Mr. Michael Miklaucic warfare operations. Since the inaugural issue of PRISM in 2010, our readership has expanded to include more than 10,000 officials, servicemen and women, and practi- tioners from across the diplomatic, defense, and development communities in more COPYEDITOR than 80 countries. Ms. Andrea L. Connell PRISM is published with support from NDU’s Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS). In 1984, Secretary of Defense Casper Weinberger established INSS EDITORIAL ASSISTANTS within NDU as a focal point for analysis of critical national security policy and Ms. Taylor Buck defense strategy issues. Today INSS conducts research in support of academic and Ms. Amanda Dawkins leadership programs at NDU; provides strategic support to the Secretary of Defense, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, combatant commands, and armed services; Ms. Alexandra Fabre de la Grange and engages with the broader national and international security communities. Ms. Julia Humphrey COMMUNICATIONS INTERNET PUBLICATIONS PRISM welcomes unsolicited manuscripts from policymakers, practitioners, and EDITOR scholars, particularly those that present emerging thought, best practices, or train- Ms. Joanna E. Seich ing and education innovations. Publication threshold for articles and critiques varies but is largely determined by topical relevance, continuing education for national and DESIGN international security professionals, scholarly standards of argumentation, quality of Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Soft Tempest: Hidden Data Transmission Using Electromagnetic Emanations
    Soft Tempest: Hidden Data Transmission Using Electromagnetic Emanations Markus G. Kuhn? and Ross J. Anderson University of Cambridge, Computer Laboratory, New Museums Site, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3QG, United Kingdom {mgk25,rja14}@cl.cam.ac.uk Abstract. It is well known that eavesdroppers can reconstruct video screen content from radio frequency emanations. We discuss techniques that enable the software on a computer to control the electromagnetic radiation it transmits. This can be used for both attack and defence. To attack a system, malicious code can encode stolen information in the machine’s RF emissions and optimise them for some combination of reception range, receiver cost and covertness. To defend a system, a trusted screen driver can display sensitive information using fonts which minimise the energy of these emissions. There is also an interesting po- tential application to software copyright protection. 1 Introduction It has been known to military organizations since at least the early 1960s that computers generate electromagnetic radiation which not only interferes with ra- dio reception, but also leaks information about the data being processed. Known as compromising emanations or Tempest radiation, a code word for a U.S. gov- ernment programme aimed at attacking the problem, the electromagnetic broad- cast of data has been a significant concern in sensitive computer applications. In his book ‘Spycatcher’ [1], former MI5 scientist Peter Wright recounts the origin of Tempest attacks on cipher machines. In 1960, Britain was negotiating to join the European Economic Community, and the Prime Minister was worried that French president De Gaulle would block Britain’s entry.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) Is a Department of Defense Combat-Support Agency and a Member of the Intelligence Community (IC)
    Approved for public release, 19-380 MESSAGE FROM THE INSPECTOR GENERAL I am pleased to present this National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) Office of Inspector General (OIG) report summarizing our work for the reporting period ending 31 March 2018. OIG conducted audit and inspection oversight, produced recommendations for improvements in a wide variety of agency programs , and pursued allegations of fraud, waste, and abuse. Working closely with the NGA directorates and offices, we closed 38 of 127 (30 percent) audit and inspection recommendations during this period. Under the Inspector General Empowerment Act of 2016, we will continue to expand our collection of metrics (see appendix A, page 22) resulting from our recommendations to the Agency. The Audit Division examined the NGA's oversight of the acquisition of a consolidated production environment. The division identified $46 million in questioned costs and $104.5 million in funds put to better use. The auditors made recommendations to improve compliance with laws and regulations related to contract and program requirements, and to enhance controls over acquisition strategy, development of program requirements, and contract oversight. The government auditors provided oversight of the independent auditors' work on the NGA financial statement audits and the annual evaluation of the NGA Information Security Program. The Inspections Division reviewed NGA's approach to capture, store, standardize, and serve GEOINT observations and determined that NGA did not adequately plan and establish sufficient governance for the program. The inspectors identified $26.6 million in questioned costs and offered recommendations to improve program implementation, focusing on oversight requirements; agency plans, goals, and milestones; and customer requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Cryptologic Quarterly, 2019-01
    Cryptologic Quarterly NSA’s Friedman Conference Center PLUS: Vint Hill Farms Station • STONEHOUSE of East Africa The Evolution of Signals Security • Mysteries of Linguistics 2019-01 • Vol. 38 Center for Cryptologic History Cryptologic Quarterly Contacts. Please feel free to address questions or comments to Editor, CQ, at [email protected]. Disclaimer. All opinions expressed in Cryptologic PUBLISHER: Center for Cryptologic History Quarterly are those of the authors. Th ey do not neces- CHIEF: John A. Tokar sarily refl ect the offi cial views of the National Security EXECUTIVE EDITOR: Pamela F. Murray Agency/Central Security Service. MANAGING EDITOR: Laura Redcay Copies of Cryptologic Quarterly can be obtained by ASSOCIATE EDITOR: Jennie Reinhardt sending an email to [email protected]. Editorial Policy. Cryptologic Quarterly is the pro- fessional journal for the National Security Agency/ Central Security Service. Its mission is to advance knowledge of all aspects of cryptology by serving as a forum for issues related to cryptologic theory, doc- trine, operations, management, and history. Th e pri- mary audience for Cryptologic Quarterly is NSA/CSS professionals, but CQ is also distributed to personnel in other United States intelligence organizations as well as cleared personnel in other federal agencies and departments. Cryptologic Quarterly is published by the Center for Cryptologic History, NSA/CSS. Th e publication is de- signed as a working aid and is not subject to receipt, control, or accountability. Cover: “Father of American cryptology” William Friedman’s retirement ceremony in the Arlington Hall Post Theater, Arlington, VA, 1955. Lieutenant General Ralph Canine is at left, Solomon Kullback is seated left, Friedman is second from right, and Director of Central Intelligence Allen Dulles is at far right.
    [Show full text]
  • A Democratic Licence to Operate Report of the Independent Surveillance Review
    A Democratic Licence to Operate Report of the Independent Surveillance Review Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies A Democratic Licence to Operate Report of the Independent Surveillance Review Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies ii A Democratic Licence to Operate Over 180 years of independent defence and security thinking The Royal United Services Institute is the UK’s leading independent think-tank on international defence and security. Its mission is to be an analytical, research-led global forum for informing, influencing and enhancing public debate on a safer and more stable world. Since its foundation in 1831, RUSI has relied on its members to support its activities, sustaining its political independence for over 180 years. London | Brussels | Nairobi | Doha | Tokyo | Washington, DC The views expressed in this publication are the authors’ own, and do not reflect the views of RUSI or any other institution. Published in 2015 by the Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – No-Derivatives 4.0 International Licence. For more information, see <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/>. Whitehall Report 2-15, July 2015. ISSN 1750-9432 Printed in the UK by Stephen Austin and Sons, Ltd. Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies Whitehall London SW1A 2ET United Kingdom +44 (0)20 7747 2600 www.rusi.org RUSI is a registered charity (No. 210639) Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations v Preface ix Executive Summary xi Recommendations xv Introduction 1 I. The Digital Society in an Information Age 5 II.
    [Show full text]
  • CIS Secure Computing
    C a s e Study M i l / A e r o CIS Secure Computing Relies on Falcon® Electric to Applications Power Electronics Inside Military Aircraft “With Falcon, we IS Secure Computing is the fastest growing The DO-160E military specification, developed CTEMPEST manufacturing company in the by the Radio Technical Commission for have found a solid United States specializing in rugged and secure Aeronautics, focuses on the performance technology partner communications solutions for the United States characteristics and environmental testing Federal Government. CIS has one of the largest for airborne equipment, computers and with a similar portfolios of products in the market, including communications gear. In particular, the DO- customer-focused numerous DO-160E qualified solutions. Their 160E governs how well the equipment handles quality standard that newest plant, a 23,000 square foot facility, is the vibration, shock and the ability to remain intact first TEMPEST-certified manufacturing facility should it be subjected to a high number of makes our business since the early 1990s, making CIS the most G-Forces in a crash. This is an area that CIS better and our contemporary TEMPEST product manufacturer has a great deal of expertise. in the industry. Located in Dulles, Va., this plant customers happy.” is home to their computer and communications “A recent project for the Air Force required a specialists who have a combined industry rugged rackmount uninterruptible power system – John Turner experience of over 90 years and includes (UPS) to protect sophisticated TEMPEST electronics housed inside an aircraft,” said John VP and General Manager certified TEMPEST professionals, electrical, and Turner, vice president and general manager CIS Secure Computing mechanical engineers.
    [Show full text]
  • TEMPEST: a Signal Problem
    S£CR£'f' (b) (3)-P.L. 86-36 TEMPEST: A Signal Problem The story of the discovery of various compromising radiations from communications and Comsec equipment. In 1962, an officer assigned to a very smaJl intelligence found with microphones for? Why was there a large metal detachment in Japan was performing the routine duty of grid carefully buried in the cement of the ceiling over the inspecting the area around his little cryptocenter. As Department of State communications area? A grid with a required, he was examining a zone 200 ft. in radius to see wire leading off somewhere. And what was the purpose of if there was any "clandestine technical surveillance." the wire that terminated in a very fine mesh of smaller hair. Across the street. perhaps a hundred feet away, was a like wires? And. while we were at it, how did these finds ,i., hospital controlled by the Japanese government. He relate to other mysterious finds and reports from behind "i sauntered past a kind of carport jutting out from one side of the Curtain-reports dating clear back to 1953? the building and, up under the eaves, noticed a peculiar Why, way back in 19:54, when the Soviets published a 1 thing-a carefully concealed dipole antenna, horizontally 1 polarized. with wires leading through the solid cinderblock rather comprehensive set of standards for the suppression wall to which the carport abutted. He moseyed back to his of radio frequency interference, were those standards much more stringent for their teletypewriters and other headquarters, then quickly notified the counter-intelligence I communications equipment than for such things as \ people and fired off a report of this "find" to Army Securi­ diathermy machines, industrial motors, and the like, even ! ty Agency, who.
    [Show full text]
  • Dodi 8523.01, "Communications Security," January 6, 2021
    DOD INSTRUCTION 8523.01 COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY Originating Component: Office of the DoD Chief Information Officer Effective: January 6, 2021 Releasability: Cleared for public release. Available on the Directives Division Website at https://www.esd.whs.mil/DD/. Reissues and Cancels: DoD Instruction 8523.01, “Communications Security (COMSEC),” April 22, 2008 Approved by: Dana Deasy, DoD Chief Information Officer Purpose: In accordance with the authority in DoD Directive 5144.02, DoD Instruction 8500.01, and the Committee on National Security Systems Policy (CNSSP) No. 1, this issuance establishes policy, assigns responsibilities, and provides procedures for managing communications security (COMSEC). DoDI 8523.01, January 6, 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1: GENERAL ISSUANCE INFORMATION .............................................................................. 3 1.1. Applicability. .................................................................................................................... 3 1.2. Policy. ............................................................................................................................... 3 SECTION 2: RESPONSIBILITIES ......................................................................................................... 4 2.1. DoD Chief Information Officer (DoD CIO). .................................................................... 4 2.2. Director, Defense Information Systems Agency. ............................................................. 4 2.3. Director, Defense Counterintelligence
    [Show full text]
  • (ITNOVA) Program Management Office (PMO) Execution
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY TASK ORDER FOR Information Technology Network Operations Virtual Alliance (ITNOVA) Program Management Office (PMO) Execution APRIL 11, 2008 PROCUREMENT SENSITIVE TABLE OF CONTENTS C.1 GENERAL INFORMATION ........................................................................................... 1 C.1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 C.1.2 Background ................................................................................................................... 1 C.1.3 Span of Support ............................................................................................................ 2 C.1.4 General Requirements .................................................................................................. 3 C.1.4.1 Contractor Responsibilities ...................................................................................... 3 C.1.5 Layout of Section C ....................................................................................................... 5 C.1.5.1 Section C Contents .................................................................................................. 5 C.1.5.20ther Document Information .................................................................................... 5 C.1.6 Required Reports and Meetings .................................................................................... 6 C.1.6.1 Contract Administration ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The National Cybersecurity Workforce Framework (“The Framework”) to Provide a Analyze Investigate Common Understanding of and Lexicon for Cybersecurity Work
    NATIONAL INITIATIVE FOR CYBERSECURITY EDUCATION (NICE) introduction The ability of academia and public and private employers to prepare, educate, recruit, train, develop, and retain a diverse, to our nation’s security and prosperity. [full text version] operate and defining cybersecurity maintain Defining the cybersecurity population using common, standardized labels and protect definitions is an essential step in ensuring securely and provision that our country is able to educate, defend recruit, train, develop, and retain a highly-qualified workforce. The National Initiative for Cybersecurity Education oversight (NICE), in collaboration with federal and government agencies, public and private development experts and organizations, and industry partners, has published version 1.0 of the National Cybersecurity Workforce Framework (“the Framework”) to provide a analyze investigate common understanding of and lexicon for cybersecurity work. [full text version] collect and The Call To ACTION operate Only in the universal adoption of the National Cybersecurity Workforce Framework can we ensure our nation’s enduring capability to prevent and defend against an ever-increasing threat. Therefore, it is imperative that organizations in the public, private, and academic sectors begin using the Framework’s lexicon (labels and definitions) as soon as possible. [full text version] Using This Sample Securely Operate and Protect and Collect and Oversight and Home Document Job Titles Provision Maintain Defend Investigate Operate Analyze Development NATIONAL INITIATIVE FOR CYBERSECURITY EDUCATION (NICE) introduction The ability of academia and public and private employers to These challenges are exacerbated by the unique aspects of prepare, educate, recruit, train, develop, and retain a highly-qualified cybersecurity work. For example, the cybersecurity workforce must cybersecurity workforce is vital to our nation’s security and prosperity.
    [Show full text]