DOCSLIB.ORG

Scarborough Rapid Transit Benefits Case

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Scarborough Rapid Transit Benefits Case SCARBOROUGH RAPID TRANSIT BENEFITS CASE January 2009 Scarborough RT Benefits Case Final Report 28th January 2009 Prepared for: Prepared by: Metrolinx Steer Davies Gleave 20 Bay Street, Suite 901 1000 - 355 Burrard Street Toronto ON M5J 2N8 Vancouver, BC V6C 2G8 In Association with: Economic Development Research Group Metropolitan Knowledge International 2 SRT Benefits Case CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................. 1 PART A PROJECT RATIONALE ........................................................................... 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose of Report ........................................................................................................................................ 1 Report Structure........................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Rationale............................................................................................................................................ 2 Context and Need ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Project Objectives ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Project Overview............................................................................................................................................ 4 Replacement and Upgrade ......................................................................................................................... 4 Extension ....................................................................................................................................................... 5 PART B OPTIONS................................................................................................ 6 Project Options ............................................................................................................................................... 6 Base Case....................................................................................................................................................... 6 Option 1 – Upgrade and Extend SRT to Malvern...................................................................................... 7 Option 2 – Extend SRT and Connect with Sheppard East LRT............................................................... 9 Option 3 – Segregated LRT Kennedy Station to Malvern Town Centre.............................................. 10 Option 4 – Segregated LRT Kennedy Station to McCowan, At-Grade LRT to Malvern Town Centre ...................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Summary of Options................................................................................................................................... 14 PART C ASSESSMENT ....................................................................................... 15 Evaluation Framework................................................................................................................................. 15 Transportation User Benefits..................................................................................................................... 16 Travel Time Benefits ................................................................................................................................. 16 Automobile Operating Cost Savings ........................................................................................................ 17 Safety Benefits ........................................................................................................................................... 17 Other Qualitative Transportation User Benefits................................................................................... 17 Summary...................................................................................................................................................... 18 1 SRT Benefits Case Financial Account ......................................................................................................................................... 19 Capital and Operating Costs..................................................................................................................... 19 Ridership and Revenues ............................................................................................................................ 21 Summary...................................................................................................................................................... 22 Comparing Benefits and Costs ................................................................................................................... 23 Environmental Impacts................................................................................................................................24 Greenhouse Gas Emissions........................................................................................................................ 24 Other Environmental Issues...................................................................................................................... 25 Economic Impacts ......................................................................................................................................... 26 Temporary Economic Impacts Generated by Construction................................................................. 26 Long-term Economic Impacts................................................................................................................... 27 Land Value Changes................................................................................................................................... 27 Summary...................................................................................................................................................... 31 Social Community Impacts.......................................................................................................................... 32 Land Use Changes....................................................................................................................................... 32 Health........................................................................................................................................................... 32 Accessibility ................................................................................................................................................ 33 Visual Impacts............................................................................................................................................. 33 Noise Impacts.............................................................................................................................................. 33 Summary...................................................................................................................................................... 35 Sensitivity Analysis....................................................................................................................................... 36 Summary Results........................................................................................................................................... 37 FIGURES Figure 1 SRT Upgrade and Extension to Malvern Town Centre 8 Figure 2 SRT Extension to Connect to SHeppard East LRT 9 Figure 3 Replace SRT with LRT Technology and Extend to Malvern Town Centre 11 Figure 4 Modified Option 3 with Partially Exclusive LRT to Malvern Town Centre 12 2 SRT Benefits Case TABLES Table 1 General Characteristics of SRT Options 14 Table 2 Incremental Transportation User Benefits (NPV) 18 Table 3 Capital and Operating Costs 20 Table 4 Incremental Capital and Operating Costs (NPV) 20 Table 5 Incremental Annual Ridership (New Riders) 21 Table 6 Incremental Costs and Revenues (NPV) 22 Table 7 Comparison Benefits and Costs (NPV) 23 Table 8 Reduction In CO2 Emissions 24 Table 9 Employment And Income Impacts During Construction 26 Table 10 Long-Term Employment and income Impacts 27 Table 11 Transit Influence on Property Values 28 Table 12 Potential Property value Uplift by Option 30 Table 13 Summary of Broader Economic Impacts 31 Table 14 Incremental Social Community Impacts 35 Table 15 Sensitivity Analysis 36 Table 16 MAE Summary 38 APPENDICES INPUT VARIABLES AND ASSUMPTIONS LAND VALUE ANALYSIS 3 SRT Benefits Case Executive Summary In 2006 the Province of Ontario created the Greater Toronto Transportation Authority, renamed to Metrolinx in December 2007. The primary responsibility of the new organisation is to provide leadership in the planning, financing and development of the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area’s (GTHA) multi-modal transportation network and to conform to the objectives and vision set out in the Places to Grow Act, 2005. Part of Metrolinx’ mandate and one of its first deliverables is the development of the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), a 25-year plan that presents the road map for the implementation of the Province’s MoveOntario
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MASTER EPR FINAL Sept.28.2010
    SCARBOROUGH RAPID TRANSIT ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT REPORT CHAPTER 2 – PROJECT DESCRIPTION circuit panels to support the systems listed above. Substations are usually constructed at-grade and are located within stations or underneath the running structure (for elevated sections). Exhibit 2-53: Potential Substation Locations for SRT Extension TTC traction power requirements typically result in a distance between substations of about 1.5 km to 2 km. Due to the power requirements for lights and equipment at stations, these substations are usually located in the vicinity of stations. The existing traction power substations at Kennedy, Lawrence East, Ellesmere, Scarborough Centre and McCowan Stations will remain part of each station but will undergo changes to accommodate the new vehicle requirements. New substations are proposed along the extension with an average of 1.5 kilometre spacing. Exhibit 2-53 presents the proposed location of the traction power substations: • At the south end of Production Drive; • Centennial College; • Sheppard Avenue; • Bellamy Station; and • Malvern Town Centre. The typical substation structures (Exhibit 2-54) are approximately 11 metres by 4.6 metres and 4 metres high. Additional length and width may be required for providing access for maintenance and an attractive façade. These structures will be carefully sited so that they do not obstruct existing and future developments along the SRT corridor. The Sheppard East LRT will also require substation in this general vicinity according to the approved Sheppard East LRT Class EA. As such, the substation located on Sheppard Avenue will be co-ordinated between the SRT and the Sheppard East LRT during design. The final locations of the electrical substations will be further investigated in the detailed design stage.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Toronto — Detached Homes Average Price by Percentage Increase: January to June 2016
    City of Toronto — Detached Homes Average price by percentage increase: January to June 2016 C06 – $1,282,135 C14 – $2,018,060 1,624,017 C15 698,807 $1,649,510 972,204 869,656 754,043 630,542 672,659 1,968,769 1,821,777 781,811 816,344 3,412,579 763,874 $691,205 668,229 1,758,205 $1,698,897 812,608 *C02 $2,122,558 1,229,047 $890,879 1,149,451 1,408,198 *C01 1,085,243 1,262,133 1,116,339 $1,423,843 E06 788,941 803,251 Less than 10% 10% - 19.9% 20% & Above * 1,716,792 * 2,869,584 * 1,775,091 *W01 13.0% *C01 17.9% E01 12.9% W02 13.1% *C02 15.2% E02 20.0% W03 18.7% C03 13.6% E03 15.2% W04 19.9% C04 13.8% E04 13.5% W05 18.3% C06 26.9% E05 18.7% W06 11.1% C07 29.2% E06 8.9% W07 18.0% *C08 29.2% E07 10.4% W08 10.9% *C09 11.4% E08 7.7% W09 6.1% *C10 25.9% E09 16.2% W10 18.2% *C11 7.9% E10 20.1% C12 18.2% E11 12.4% C13 36.4% C14 26.4% C15 31.8% Compared to January to June 2015 Source: RE/MAX Hallmark, Toronto Real Estate Board Market Watch *Districts that recorded less than 100 sales were discounted to prevent the reporting of statistical anomalies R City of Toronto — Neighbourhoods by TREB District WEST W01 High Park, South Parkdale, Swansea, Roncesvalles Village W02 Bloor West Village, Baby Point, The Junction, High Park North W05 W03 Keelesdale, Eglinton West, Rockcliffe-Smythe, Weston-Pellam Park, Corso Italia W10 W04 York, Glen Park, Amesbury (Brookhaven), Pelmo Park – Humberlea, Weston, Fairbank (Briar Hill-Belgravia), Maple Leaf, Mount Dennis W05 Downsview, Humber Summit, Humbermede (Emery), Jane and Finch W09 W04 (Black Creek/Glenfield-Jane
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Rapid Transit Service Breaks Ground in Mississauga
    No. H0xx/10 For release August 20, 2010 BUS RAPID TRANSIT SERVICE BREAKS GROUND IN MISSISSAUGA MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO — Bob Dechert, Member of Parliament, Mississauga-Erindale, the Honourable Kathleen Wynne, Ontario’s Transportation Minister, Her Worship Hazel McCallion, Mayor of Mississauga and Gary McNeil, GO Transit Managing Director participated in a groundbreaking ceremony today to mark the start of construction of the Mississauga Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) corridor. This project, which is expected to be completed in spring 2013, will improve local and inter-regional bus operations across the City of Mississauga. It involves constructing an 11-kilometre east-west busway across the City of Mississauga between Winston Churchill Boulevard and Renforth Drive in the City of Toronto and a total of 12 stations along the route with related commuter facilities. “Investments in public transit creates jobs and boosts the Canadian economy,” said MP Dechert. “This rapid transit system will provide commuters in Mississauga with a more efficient transit option, while cutting commute times and taking more cars off the road.” “This is great news for Mississauga residents,” said Ontario Transportation Minister Kathleen Wynne. “When the new bus rapid transit line is finished, more commuters will be able to leave their cars at home and take public transit. Investing in public transit is part of the McGuinty government’s Open Ontario plan. Better public transit means a better quality of life for Ontario families.” (TBC) “We are doing everything we can to make Mississauga a transit-oriented city and show our commitment to ensure we meet the needs of residents and businesses,” said Mayor Hazel McCallion.
    [Show full text]
  • Area Transportation System Problems and Opportunities Report
    GTA West Corridor Planning and Environmental Assessment Study Revised Draft Area Transportation System Problems and Opportunities Report GTA West Corridor Planning and Environmental Assessment Study Revised Draft Area Transportation System Problems and Opportunities Report PREFACE The Area Transportation System Problems and Opportunities Report – Draft for Consultation (2009) is one of several interim reports which depicts the study process culminating in the Transportation Development Strategy. The Area Transportation System Problems and Opportunities Report – Draft for Consultation (2009) was first issued in July 2009. The reports purpose was to summarize the process and methodology that was used to identify transportation problems and opportunities, and to document the key findings of this work. In the consultation period following its release, the study team received comments relating to a range of issues, including municipal planning policy, transportation modelling, and planned transportation initiatives within the preliminary study area. The purpose of this revised draft report (December 2010) is to ensure that all comments received have been adequately addressed; where appropriate, the content of the report has been revised accordingly. Appendix C provides a Summary of the Input Received on the draft Problems and Opportunities Report, and details each comment received, the study team’s response, and any changes incorporated into the revised draft report. www.gta-west.com GTA West Corridor Planning and Environmental Assessment Study
    [Show full text]
  • City of Toronto: Get Involved
    City of Toronto: Get involved http://www.toronto.ca/involved/projects/malvern_lrt/faq.htm Scarborough-Malvern Light Rail Transit (LRT) Transit City Updated of November 13, 2009 Malvern Light Rail in 51 languages Transit Frequently Asked Questions Frequently asked questions General Contact us When is the earliest that construction could start and finish? How will Transit City help Toronto? How is Light Rail Transit (LRT) superior to existing streetcar service in Toronto? What work has been completed since the last round of Open Houses in 2008? What specific transit connections is the LRT aiming to address? Existing Bus Routes What will happen to existing bus routes in the area after the LRT is built / Which routes will be changed or removed? Connections and Service How will a connection be made at Kennedy Station? How does the Scarborough-Malvern LRT relate/connect to the proposed extension of the Scarborough Rapid Transit (SRT)? Are both projects (Malvern and SRT) needed north of Sheppard Avenue? What are the future plans for TTC connections at the Guildwood GO / VIA Rail Station? Could GO / TTC increase parking spots at Guildwood GO/ VIA Rail Station? Could the Eglinton Crosstown LRT and Scarborough-Malvern LRT terminate at Guildwood GO / VIA Rail Station instead of Kennedy Station? How will the Scarborough-Malvern LRT connect with the Kingston Rd transit project? How frequently will vehicles serve the Scarborough-Malvern LRT route? (e.g. every 10 minutes)? Protecting Green Space How will green spaces and trees (Morningside Park) be protected?
    [Show full text]
  • Round 2 Consultation Report 2020-2021, TO360
    Consultation Report TO360 Wayfinding Strategy 2020-2021 Public Consultation Round Two March 2021 Table of Contents Background .................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of the local map consultation ................................................................................... 2 Outreach and notification ........................................................................................................... 5 Summary of engagement statistics ........................................................................................... 9 Detailed feedback by local map area....................................................................................... 10 Other feedback about TO360 maps, in general ..................................................................... 19 Next steps ................................................................................................................................... 19 Attachment A: List of organizations invited to participate Attachment B: Round Two Draft Wayfinding Maps Background The Toronto 360 (“TO360”) Wayfinding project is a pedestrian wayfinding system which is a central component of the City’s ambition to make Toronto a more walkable, welcoming and understandable place for visitors and residents alike. TO360 provides consistent wayfinding information through a unified signage and mapping system delivered by the City and project partners. Following the successful completion of
    [Show full text]
  • Commission Report Macro
    Form Revised: February 2005 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO. MEETING DATE: JUNE 18, 2008 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF THE SHEPPARD EAST LRT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT STUDY ACTION ITEM: x RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that the Commission: 1. Approve the recommendation of the joint City/TTC Sheppard East LRT Environmental Assessment (EA) study, that a Light Rail Transit (LRT) line be constructed on Sheppard Avenue East, between Don Mills Station and Meadowvale Road, to provide transit service in that corridor, as outlined in this report; 2. Forward this report to the City of Toronto, and request that City Council, at it’s meeting on July 15, 2008, approve the recommendations of the Sheppard East LRT EA study to allow staff to begin detailed design as soon as possible, and be in a position to begin construction of this first Transit City light rail line in 2009; 3. Request that City Council: i) authorise staff to submit the final Environmental Assessment Study report for the 30-day public review period, as required to complete the EA process for this project; ii) advise the Province of Ontario of its approval of this EA study; 4. Note that City Planning is proceeding to amend the Toronto Official Plan so that Sheppard Avenue East, from McCowan Road to Meadowvale Road, is included as a Transit Priority Corridor, in support of this project; 5. Note that City Planning staff have been full participants in the preparation of this environmental assessment. They have reviewed this report, and they concur with its recommendations; and 6. Forward this report to Metrolinx, to confirm previous information that the Sheppard East light rail line is ready to proceed to implementation and, therefore, should be included in Metrolinx’s forthcoming ‘first wave’ funding approval.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Toronto Transportation Authority)
    AGENDA ITEM NO: 3 AGENDA TITLE: APPROVAL OF NOVEMBER 23, 2007 MINUTES METROLINX (GREATER TORONTO TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY) BOARD MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF BOARD NO. 8 DATE OF MEETING: Friday, November 23, 2007 PLACE OF MEETING: Westin Harbour Castle One Harbour Square, Marine Room Toronto, ON 10:00 a.m. CHAIR: Rob MacIsaac MEMBERS PRESENT: Adam Giambrone Roger Anderson Paul Bedford Gary Carr Fred Eisenberger Bill Fisch Norm Kelly Hazel McCallion David Miller Peter Smith STAFF PRESENT: Michael Fenn, CEO Mary Martin, Corporate Secretary Metrolinx Staff Page 1 of 8 AGENDA ITEM NO: 3 AGENDA TITLE: APPROVAL OF BOARD MINUTES CALL TO ORDER: Chair MacIsaac called the meeting to order at 10:05 am. Chair MacIsaac welcomed the municipal partners who joined the meeting to assist with the Quick Wins report. Chair MacIsaac confirmed there was quorum and that the required notice of the meeting as stipulated under the By-Law of the Corporation had been sent. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: The Chair requested declarations of potential conflicts of interest and none were declared. CONFIRMATION OF PREVIOUS MINUTES: RESOLVED: THAT the minutes of the Board meeting of October 26, 2007 be approved. Carried AGENDA REVIEW There were no further additions or changes to the Agenda. CHAIR’S REMARKS: Chair MacIsaac acknowledged the very full agenda before the Board members and the significance of substantive issues, including a second tranche of transit projects and the first green paper in the Regional Transportation Plan. The chair also recognized the representatives from the successful consortium of consulting firms that have combined their talent and expertise for the development of the Regional Transportation Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Master Plan
    A NEW PATH TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN November 2012 Table of Contents page 1. Introduction ......................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Historical Patterns of Growth ..................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Planning Background and Regional Context.............................................................. 1-2 1.3 Study Purpose ........................................................................................................... 1-4 1.3.1 Addressing Future Transportation Needs ....................................................... 1-5 1.3.2 Satisfying Class EA Requirements ................................................................. 1-5 1.4 Study Process ........................................................................................................... 1-7 1.5 Public Engagement ................................................................................................... 1-9 1.5.1 Public Open Houses ...................................................................................... 1-9 1.5.2 Workshop Series .......................................................................................... 1-10 1.5.3 Technical Advisory Committee ..................................................................... 1-10 1.6 Transportation Issues and Challenges ..................................................................... 1-11 2. Vaughan Today – Existing Conditions .............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Potential Impacts of an Inclusionary Zoning Policy in the City of Toronto
    The City of Toronto Evaluation of Potential Impacts of an Inclusionary Zoning Policy in the City of Toronto May 2019 The City of Toronto Evaluation of Potential Impacts of an Inclusionary Zoning Policy in the City of Toronto Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. ii 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Housing Prices and Costs – Fundamental Factors ...................................................................... 2 3.0 Market Context ........................................................................................................................... 8 4.0 The Conceptual Inclusionary Zoning Policy .............................................................................. 12 5.0 Approach to Assessing Impacts ................................................................................................ 14 6.0 Analysis ..................................................................................................................................... 21 7.0 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................... 34 Disclaimer: The conclusions contained in this report have been prepared based on both primary and secondary data sources. NBLC makes every effort to ensure the data is correct but cannot guarantee
    [Show full text]
  • Toronto Municipal Election Campaign Literature (Including the Former Metropolitan Toronto Municipalities)
    TORONTO MUNICIPAL ELECTION CAMPAIGN LITERATURE (INCLUDING THE FORMER METROPOLITAN TORONTO MUNICIPALITIES) NAME INDEX The following index covers the campaign literature held by the library for the municipal elections from 1969 - 2010 and also includes the by-elections for Toronto Ward 4, 1979; Wards 2 and 6, 1981; Ward 6, 1984; Wards 5 and 7, 1987; Wards 8, 11 and 12, 1990, Ward 16, 1999 and Ward 31, 2001. As of 1997 municipal election, wards refer to the amalgamated City of Toronto. For a list of campaign literature held in the City of Toronto Archives please see the section at the end of the book. MABLEY, Margaret Toronto, School Trustee, Wards 5 & 6, 1991 MACARAIG. Marvin Toronto, Councillor, Ward 36, 2010 MacDONALD, A. H. (Andy) Etobicoke, Controller, 1974 MacDONALD, Chris Toronto, Councillor, Ward 7, 2010 MacDONALD, Roy Toronto, Councillor, Ward 16, 2010 MacGILCHRIST, Robert Toronto, Alderman, Ward 11, 1969 MacGRAY, Martha Etobicoke, Councillor, Ward 3, 1988 MACHLIS, Vlad North York, School Trustee, Ward 6, 1978 MACK, Cliff Toronto, School Trustee, Ward 6, 1972 (See also Jacqui Henderson, Mayor, 1972, TORONTO) MACKAY, Jim Scarborough, School Trustee, Ward 14, 1988 Toronto, Councillor, Ward 18 – Scarborough Malvern, 1997 MacKENZIE, Bob East York, Alderman, Ward 2, 1976 MacKENZIE, Milt North York, School Trustee, Ward 7, 1972 MACKIE, John Scarborough, Alderman, Ward 9, 1980 Scarborough, Alderman, Ward 9, 1982 Scarborough, Alderman, Ward 9, 1985 Scarborough, Councillor, Ward 9, 1988 MacLEAN, Thomas Etobicoke, School Trustee, Ward 2,
    [Show full text]
  • STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 8304 Sheppard Avenue East
    STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 8304 Sheppard Avenue East - Official Plan & Rezoning Applications - Preliminary Report Date: February 16, 2010 To: Planning and Growth Management Committee From: Chief Planner and Executive Director Wards: Ward 42 – Scarborough-Rouge River Reference 10 102286 ESC 42 OZ Number: SUMMARY These applications were made on or after January 1, 2007 and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006. These applications propose a Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) Light Rail Vehicle (LRV) Maintenance and Storage Facility at 8304 Sheppard Avenue East. This facility is intended to serve the Sheppard East, Eglinton Crosstown and Scarborough Malvern Light Rail Transit (LRT) lines which are all part of the Transit City Plan. This report provides preliminary information on the above-noted applications and seeks Planning and Growth Management Committee’s direction on the further processing of the applications and on the community consultation process. These applications seeks to permit a maintenance and storage facility which is a key component of the Transit City Plan. Accordingly, staff is of the view that the application should be deemed a matter of City-wide interest and that all planning reports be routed through and the public Staff report for action – Preliminary Report - 8304 Sheppard Avenue East 1 meeting held before the Planning and Growth Management Committee. The applications should proceed through the normal planning process in terms of community consultation. Staff will attempt to combine the community consultation for these Planning Act applications with the second public open house to be held as part of the required Environmental Assessment process.
    [Show full text]