DOCSLIB.ORG

Anayasa Yargisi 31

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Anayasa Yargisi 31 Anayasa Mahkemesi Yayınları: 65 ANAYASA YARGISI 31 Anayasa Mahkemesinin 52. Kuruluş Yıldönümü Etkinlikleri Kapsamında Düzenlenen “Asya Anayasa Mahkemeleri ve Muadili Kurumlar Birliği 2. Kongresi”nde Sunulan Bildiriler 28 Nisan 2014 Hilton Otel İstanbul Anayasa Mahkemesi Yayınları ISSN 1301 - 1200 ISBN 978-975-7427-85-8 Anayasa Yargısı - 31 © 2016, Anayasa Mahkemesi Anayasa Mahkemesinin yazılı izni olmaksızın, kitabın tümünün veya bir kısmının elektronik, mekanik ya da fotokopi yoluyla basımı, yayımı, çoğaltılması ve dağıtımı yapılamaz. Dergide yayımlanan yazılar, kaynak gösterilmeden başka bir yerde yayımlanamaz. Dergide yayımla- nan yazı ve tebliğlerde ileri sürülen görüşler yalnızca yazarlarına aittir; Anayasa Mahkemesini bağlamaz. Sempozyumda sunulan tebliğler üzerinde yayın ilkeleri doğrultusunda biçimsel düzeltmeler yapılabilir. İletişim ve İstem Adresi Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı Yayın ve Halkla İlişkiler Müdürlüğü Ahlatlıbel Mahallesi İncek Şehit Savcı Mehmet Selim Kiraz Bulvarı No: 4 06805 Çankaya/Ankara Telefon : (312) 463 73 00 Faks : (312) 463 74 00 www.anayasa.gov.tr Tasarım ve Baskı EPAMAT Basın Yayın Promosyon San. Tic. Ltd. Şti. Tel: (0312) 394 48 63 Faks: (0312) 394 48 65 www.epamat.com.tr Basım Tarihi Kasım 2016 II İÇİNDEKİLER Kongre Programı ........................................................................................................................................................... VI Katılımcı Listesi .............................................................................................................................................................. X Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanı Sayın Haşim Kılıç‘ın Töreni Açış Konuşması .................. 1 Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanı Sayın Haşim Kılıç‘ın Kongre Açış Konuşması................ 11 ULUSLARARASI KURULUŞLARIN BAŞKAN VE TEMSİLCİLERİNİN AÇILIŞ KONUŞMALARI Mogoeng Mogoeng Asya Anayasa Mahkemeleri ve Muadili Kurumlar Birliğinin İkinci Kongresi Açılış Konuşması ...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................25 Prof. Dr. Gerhart Holzinger Asya Anayasa Mahkemeleri ve Muadili Kurumlar Birliğinin İkinci Kongresi Açılış Konuşması..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................37 Park Han-Chul Asya’da Barış ve İnsan Haklarının Korunmasına Yönelik Uluslararası İşbirliği .......45 Dr. Gianni Buquicchio Anayasal Düzenin Korunmasında Anayasa Mahkemelerinin ve Yüksek Mahkemelerin Rolü ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................57 BİLDİRİ VE TARTIŞMALAR BİRİNCİ OTURUM “Sosyal Hakların Anayasa Mahkemeleri Tarafından Korunması” “İnsan Haklarının Bireysel Başvuru Yoluyla Korunması” Prof. Gulraman Qazi Sosyal Hakların Anayasa Mahkemeleri Tarafından Korunması: Afganistan Örneği .........................................................................................................................................................................................................................75 Dr. Hamdan Zoelva Adat Law (Örf ve Adet Hukukunun Uygulandığı) Topluluklarının Sosyal Haklarının Korunmasında Endonezya Cumhuriyeti Anayasa Mahkemesinin Rolü ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................89 Jinsung Lee Sosyal Hakların Kore Anayasa Mahkemesince Korunması Sosyal Refah Haklarına Odaklanma .........................................................................................................................................................109 III Kalyan Shrestha Sosyal Hakların Anayasa Mahkemelerince Korunması ................................................................................125 Charoon Intachan Tayland Anayasa Mahkemesince İnsan Haklarının Korunması ................................................141 Prof. Dr. Engin Yıldırım Sosyal Hakların Dava Edilebilirliği/Edilemezliği ve Anayasa Mahkemeleri: Türk Bakış Açısı (Genişletilmiş Özet) ..................................................................................................................................................153 Soru-Cevap ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................161 Prof. Dr. Zühtü Arslan Türkiye’de Anayasa Şikâyeti: Fırsatlar ve Sorunlar ................................................................................................167 Dr. Feras Milhem Bireysel Başvuru Yoluyla İnsan Haklarının Korunması Filistin’den Dersler ........185 Soru-Cevap ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................201 İKİNCİ OTURUM “Anayasa Mahkemeleri, Yüksek Mahkemeler ve Parlamento İlişkileri” Valerija Galić Bosna Hersek Anayasa Mahkemesi ve Bosna Hersek Parlamenterler Meclisi Arasındaki İlişki .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................217 Dr. Igor Rogov Kazakistan Cumhuriyeti Anayasa Konseyinin Anayasal Meşruiyeti Temin Etme Hususunda Devlet Erkleri ile Olan İşbirliği .....................................................................................................225 Jugnee Amarsanaa Anayasa Mahkemesi ve Parlamento Arasındaki İlişkiler: Mevcut Durum ve Çözüm Yaklaşımları ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................235 Gadis Gadzhiev Bir Halkın Kendisi Olma Hakkının Felsefi ve Hukuki Anlamları Konusunda .........................................................................................................................................................................................................249 Soru-Cevap ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................269 ÜÇÜNCÜ OTURUM “Anayasa Yargısında Yorum Yöntemleri” Dato Seri Paduka Hj Kifrawi bin Dato Paduka Hj Kifli Anayasa’nın Yorumlanmasında Yüksek Mahkeme’nin Rolü ...........................................................279 IV Doç. Dr. Ali Rıza Çoban Anayasa Mahkemesi: Anayasanın Yorumlayıcısı mı Yoksa Bireysel Hakların Koruyucusu mu? ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................291 Dr. Serdar Gülener Bireysel Başvuru ve Anayasal Denetimde Anayasal Yorum: Anayasa Yargısı Sistemini İki Farklı Boyut Aracılığıyla Anlama ................................................................................................................311 Tun Arifin bin Zakaria Anayasa Yargısında Yorum Yöntemleri ............................................................................................................................................327 Soru-Cevap ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................383 DÖRDÜNCÜ OTURUM “Anayasal Düzenin Korunmasında Anayasa ve Yüksek Mahkemelerin Rolü” George Papuashvili Gürcistan’ın Anayasal Düzeninin Temel Taşı olarak Adalete Erişim ..............................393 Mogoeng Mogoeng Anayasal Düzenin Korunmasında Anayasa Mahkemelerinin ve Yüksek Mahkemelerin Rolü ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................401 Fared Al Jallad Anayasal Sistemi Korumada Anayasa Mahkemesinin Rolü / Filistin Modeli ..........417 Mohan Peiris Yargının Temel Hakların Korunmasındaki Rolü ..........................................................................................................429 Soru-Cevap ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................453 KAPANIŞ KONUŞMALARI Park Han-Chul Asya Anayasa Mahkemeleri ve Muadili Kurumlar Birliğinin İkinci Kongresi Kapanış Konuşması .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................467
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transformation from Tent to Room: Room of Traditional Turkish House
    IJASOS- International E-Journal of Advances in Social Sciences, Vol. III, Issue 9, December 2017 TRANSFORMATION FROM TENT TO ROOM: ROOM OF TRADITIONAL TURKISH HOUSE Deniz Demirarslan Ass.Prof Dr.,Kocaeli University, TURKEY, [email protected] Abstract The room has a function of nucleus in the formation of Turkish House which has an important place in the sense of traditional residence features in the world and the planning of this residence begins with room. Therefore, this residence is a phenomenon that develops from inner space through outer space. The formation of the room of traditional Turkish house is influenced by various elements. On top of them there come the requirements of nomads and Turkish-Islamic life style. The effects of these are clearly observed in the architectural design and decoration of the room which is shaped by the features of traditional life and bestows its design characteristics from nomad tent. Before immigrating to Anatolia from 11th century A.D., Turks have lived mostly a nomadic life in Middle Asia. Therefore, just like in other Middle Asia cultures; Turks have lived in temporary shelters. After settling in Anatolia and before that after accepting Islam; Turks have started to lead a sedentary life and formed a new living culture with the effect of various Anatolian civilizations, notably the Byzantines. In this way, a type of residence which is built in Anatolia, Balkans and Caucasus in the period of Ottoman Empire has emerged. The room of this type of house which lasted from 15th century to the second half of 19th century forms the nucleus of design.
    [Show full text]
  • European Court of Human Rights Leyla Sahin Decision
    EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS UNDER THE LIGHT OF LEYLA SAHIN DECISION Attorney Fatma Benli Translated by Bengül Altaş, Maryam Al Zoubi, Hüseyin Erkaya, Dilek Gölet, Ayşe Maden, Jonathan Sugden, Melek Hilal Yazıcı 2010 İSTANBUL I With my endless thanks to my family who are always supporting me limitlessly. Fatma Benli Preface Though during the 80s it is a time-to time recurring food of controversy; “headscarf in the Turkish Universities”, become a material problem after the February 28 Post- Modern coup d’Etat. First the sentence of “Behaviors about the apparel which are emerged against law, push the Turkey into an outdated image; shall be banned; the law and Constitutional Court Decisions about this subject shall be applied without any exception especially on the public instutions and associations.” had been added to the well-known MGK (National Security Council) decisions. Approximately a year later, The Constitutional Court had cited the Party’s defence for freedom of headscarf in Universities as a reason of their decision of the ban of Refah Party. (Welfare Party) After the Ban decision, while wearing headscarf was completely free, a retired military officer who had a duty at the MGK, had given briefings on “how the headscarf would be banned”, to firstly university rectors, then to Judges. After then, Committee of Rectors, had published a declaration with the title of “The regulations governing the apparel at the Higher Education Institutions and Legal Comments” –which is probably had been prepared during those briefings-. After that declaration of Committee of rectors, “the rectors that are taken the briefing” had understood that the headscarf is banned at the universities and they applied the headscarf ban at this direction.
    [Show full text]
  • Female Silences, Turkey's Crises
    Female Silences, Turkey’s Crises Female Silences, Turkey’s Crises: Gender, Nation and Past in the New Cinema of Turkey By Özlem Güçlü Female Silences, Turkey’s Crises: Gender, Nation and Past in the New Cinema of Turkey By Özlem Güçlü This book first published 2016 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2016 by Özlem Güçlü All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-9436-2 ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-9436-4 To Serhan Şeşen (1982-2008) and Onur Bayraktar (1979-2010) TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures .......................................................................................... viii Acknowledgements ..................................................................................... ix Notes on Translations ................................................................................. xi Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 And Silence Enters the Scene Chapter One ............................................................................................... 30 New Cinema of Turkey and the Novelty of Silence Chapter Two .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Turkish Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care (TJFMPC) Is Published Online 4 Times a Year; March, June, September and December
    The Turkish Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care (TJFMPC) is published online 4 times a year; March, June, September and December. The peer-reviewed journal's chief objective is to provide high- quality continuing medical education for family physicians and other primary care professionals. Turkish Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care (TJFMPC) dergisi yılda 4 kez(Mart, Haziran, Eylül ve Aralık) sadece online olarak 2007 yılından bu yana yayınlanmaktadır. Hakemli derginin ana amacı aile hekimleri ve diğer birinci basamakta görev alan meslek grupları için iyi kalitede sürekli mesleki gelişimi sağlamaktır. Electronic Journal (e-ISSN: 1307-2048) Contact us: Nafiz Bozdemir Çukurova Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Aile Hekimliği Anabilim Dalı 01330, Balcalı- Sarıçam- Adana Türkiye E mail: [email protected] [email protected] Tel: 90-322-3386060-3087 Turkish Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care Editor in Chief Nafiz Bozdemir, Çukurova University, Turkey Editors Language Editors Sevgi Özcan (Çukurova University, Turkey) English Language: Hatice Kurdak (Çukurova University, Turkey) Hatice Çubukcu (Çukurova University, Turkey) Dilek Güldal (Dokuz Eylül University, Turkey) Tolga Günvar (Dokuz Eylül University, Turkey) M. Mümtaz Mazıcıoğlu (Erciyes University, Turkey) Özden Gökdemir (İzmir Ekonomi University,Turkey) Erkan Melih Şahin (Onsekizmart University, Turkey) Yusuf Çetin Doğaner (SBÜ Gülhane Tıp Fakültesi) Recep Erol Sezer (Yeditepe University, Turkey) Çiğdem Gereklioğlu (Cukurova University, Turkey) Ruhuşen Kutlu (NE Üniversity,
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey: Minorities, Othering and Discrimination, Citizenship Claims
    Turkey: Minorities, Othering and Discrimination, Citizenship Claims Document Identifier D4.9 Report on 'Turkey: How to manage a sizable citezenry outside the country across the EU'. Version 1.0 Date Due 31.08.2016 Submission date 27.09.2016 WorkPackage WP4 Rivalling citizenship claims elsewhere Lead Beneficiary 23 BU Dissemination Level PU Change log Version Date amended by changes 1.0 26.09.2016 Hakan Yilmaz Final deliverable sent to coordinator after implementing review comments. Partners involved number partner name People involved 23 Boğaziçi University Prof. dr. Hakan Yilmaz and Çağdan Erdoğan Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................... 4 PART I) MINORITIES IN TURKEY: HISTORICAL EVOLUTION AND CONTEMPORARY SITUATION ...................... 5 1) A Brief History of Minority Groups in Turkey .................................................................................... 5 2) The End of the Ottoman Millet System ............................................................................................ 5 3) Defining the Minority Groups in the Newly Emerging Nation- State ................................................ 6 4) What Happened to the Non-Muslim Population of Turkey? ............................................................. 7 5) What Happened to the Unrecognized Minorities in Turkey? .......................................................... 10 PART II) THE KURDISH QUESTION: THE PINNACLE OF THE
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey Page 1 of 8
    Turkey Page 1 of 8 Turkey International Religious Freedom Report 2005 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor The Constitution provides for freedom of religion, and the Government generally respects this right in practice; however, the Government imposes some restrictions on Muslim and other religious groups and on Muslim religious expression in government offices and state-run institutions, including universities. There was some deterioration in respect for religious freedom during the reporting period. The Government's Directorate of Religious Affairs (Diyanet) initiated a public campaign against Christian missionary activity in the country. High-level government officials made statements depicting missionaries as a threat. There was also an increase in anti-Christian media coverage. Threats and vandalism against Christians and church facilities increased. In addition, some Muslims, Christians, and Baha'is faced some restrictions and occasional harassment for alleged proselytizing or holding unauthorized meetings. The State continued to oppose "Islamic fundamentalism." Authorities continued their broad ban on wearing Muslim religious dress in government facilities, including universities, schools, and workplaces. The generally tolerant relationship among religions in society contributed to religious freedom in principle; however, a sharp debate continued over the country's definition of "secularism," the proper role of religion in society, and the potential influence of the country's small minority of Islamists. According to the general perception, Turkish identity is based on the Turkish language and the Islamic faith. Religious minorities say they are effectively blocked from careers in state institutions, a claim supported in a report by a government human rights body. Christians, Baha'is, and some Muslims faced societal suspicion and mistrust, and more radical Islamist elements continued to express anti-Semitic sentiments.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. ProQuest Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ILL-FATED’ SONS OF THE ‘NATION’: OTTOMAN PRISONERS OF WAR IN RUSSIA AND EGYPT, 1914-1922 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Yucel Yarukdag.
    [Show full text]
  • Mustafa Kemal Atatürk 1 Mustafa Kemal Atatürk
    Mustafa Kemal Atatürk 1 Mustafa Kemal Atatürk Mustafa Kemal Atatürk [[file:MustafaKemalAtaturk.jpg alt=]] President Atatürk 1st President of Turkey In office 29 October 1923 – 10 November 1938 (15 years, 12 days) Prime Minister Ali Fethi Okyar İsmet İnönü Celâl Bayar Succeeded by İsmet İnönü 1st Prime Minister of Turkey In office 3 May 1920 – 24 January 1921 (0 years, 266 days) Succeeded by Fevzi Çakmak 1st Speaker of the Parliament of Turkey In office 24 April 1920 – 29 October 1923 (3 years, 219 days) Succeeded by Ali Fethi Okyar 1st Leader of the Republican People's Party In office 9 September 1923 – 10 November 1938 (15 years, 62 days) Succeeded by İsmet İnönü Personal details Born 19 May 1881 (Conventional. This date was adopted by the president himself for official purposes in the absence of precise knowledge concerning the real date.)Salonica, Ottoman Empire (present-day Thessaloniki, Greece) Died 10 November 1938 (aged 57)Dolmabahçe Palace Istanbul, Turkey Resting place Anıtkabir Ankara, Turkey Nationality Turkish Political party Committee of Union and Progress, Republican People's Party Spouse(s) Lâtife Uşaklıgil (1923–25) Religion See Mustafa Kemal Atatürk's religious views. Signature Military service Mustafa Kemal Atatürk 2 Allegiance Ottoman Empire (1893 – 8 July 1919) Republic of Turkey (9 July 1919 – 30 June 1927) Army Service/branch Rank Ottoman Empire: General (Pasha) Republic of Turkey: Mareşal (Marshal) Commands 19th Division – 16th Corps – 2nd Army – 7th Army – Yildirim Army Group – commander-in-chief of Army of the
    [Show full text]
  • ANAYASA MAHKEMESİ (Tarihsel Perspektiften Olaylar, Kişiler, Kararlar) İÇİNDEKİLER ÖNSÖZ
    Prof. Dr. Dr. Öğr. Üyesi SERDAR GÜLENER CEM DURAN UZUN TÜRKİYE CUMHURİYETİ ANAYASA MAHKEMESİ (Tarihsel Perspektiften Olaylar, Kişiler, Kararlar) İÇİNDEKİLER ÖNSÖZ ....................................................................................................................V İÇİNDEKİLER ...................................................................................................VII ŞEKİLLER LİSTESİ ........................................................................................XIII GİRİŞ .........................................................................................................................1 BİRİNCİ BÖLÜM KANUNLARIN ANAYASAYA UYGUNLUK DENETİMİ VE 1961 ANAYASASI ÖNCESİ DÖNEMDE TÜRKİYE’DEKİ ARAYIŞLAR I. Siyasal İktidarın Sınırlandırılması Arayışları (Anayasacılık Hareketleri) ve Anayasaya Uygunluk Denetiminin Ortaya Çıkışı .....5 A. Siyasal İktidarın Sınırlandırılması Fikri ve 1787 Amerika Birleşik Devletleri Anayasası .................................................................5 1. “Üstün Hukuk”a Bağlılık Fikrinin Tarihselliği ve Yargısal Denetimin İlk Örnekleri ..................................................7 2. Amerikan Modelinin Ortaya Çıkışı ve Anayasa Yargısının Birinci Dalgası ..............................................................12 3. Avrupa (Kelsen) Modelinin Ortaya Çıkışı ve Anayasa Yargısının İkinci Dalgası ...............................................................16 4. Sovyetler Birliğinin Dağılması ve Anayasa Yargısının Üçüncü Dalgası ................................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • Huitième Président De La République De Turquie: Turgut Özal
    La République de Turquie a 66 ans Citation d’Atatürk: ‘Paix dans le pays, paix dans le monde. C’est l’un des plus fondamentaux principes et idéaux de la République de Turquie” ANKARA (A.A)-Le 66ème anniver­ saire de la proclamation de la République a été célébré avec enthousiasme par le peu­ ple turc, dans les représentations turques à l’étranger et en République turque de Chypre Nord le 29 octobre. Le président de la République M.Kenan Evren s’est rendu au mausolée d’Atatürk et a observé une minute de silence à la mémoire du fondateur de la Républi­ que; y étaient présents le président de la Grande Assemblée Nationale de Turquie, M.Yildirim Akbulut, le premier ministre M.Turgut Ôzal, les membres du conseil de la présidence, le chef de l’état-major géné­ ral, le général Necip Torumtay, les leaders ç des partis politiques et les ministres. & “ Nous sommes fiers de célébrer un g nouvel anniversaire de la République turque o que vous avez considérée comme la forme g su ite page 7 Troisième tour de scrutin à la GANT Huitième président de la République de Turquie: Turgut Özal ANKARA (DGPI)-Le premier minis­ de la République mardi par 263 voix des 450 tre et président du parti de la mère-patrie députés de la Grande Assemblée Nationale (ANAP) M.Turgut Ozal a été élu président su ite page 7 Biographie de M.Ozal Il est né le 13 octobre 1927 à Malatya. // fonte et forge. En 1977, il a été nommé au a été diplômé en 1950 de l’Université techni­ Conseil d ’administration et à la présidence du que d ’Istanbul en tant qu’ingénieur électricien.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Court of Turkey
    Constitutional Court of Turkey Constitutional Court of Turkey www.constitutionalcourt.gov.tr 3 THE PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE First of all, I would like to extend my heartfelt greetings to all readers of this booklet and express my thanks for their genuine interest in the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Turkey. This booklet pro- vides brief information on the general structure, the jurisdiction and proceedings as well as the physical properties of the Constitutional Court. The Turkish Constitutional Court, being one of the oldest constitu- tionality review organs established in Europe, has accumulated a sizeable amount of experience in its history of more than fifty years. You will find reflections of the development of constitutional justice in our country and the Court’s transformation process up to present in this booklet. Prof. Dr. Zühtü Arslan The basic function of the Constitutional Court of Turkey can be sum- President marized as safeguarding and promoting democracy, rule of law and the fundamental rights and freedoms. In performing this crucial function, the Court has learned a lot from its past experiences and continuously developed its jurisprudence to better address the needs of the time. I am more than happy to express that Turkish Constitutional Court has shown a significant progress to achieve a paradigm shift and adopted a “rights-based paradigm” in the recent years. Our Court strives to establish con- stitutional and individual justice through constitutionality review and individual application. Consequently, the Constitutional Court has become the bulwark of fundamental rights and freedoms to a considerable extent. This paradigm shift can be tracked down especially in our judgments concerning individual applications.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Atatürk Reforms in Early Turkish Republic Between 1923-1946 from an Educational Perspective
    The Case of Atatürk Reforms in Early Turkish Republic Between 1923-1946 From an Educational Perspective The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Akgul, Ahmet. 2019. The Case of Atatürk Reforms in Early Turkish Republic Between 1923-1946 From an Educational Perspective. Master's thesis, Harvard Extension School. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:42004235 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Atatürk Reforms in the Early Turkish Republic, 1923-1946: An Educational Perspective Ahmet Selçuk Akgül A Thesis in the Field of International Relations for the Degree of Master of Liberal Arts in Extension Studies Harvard University March 2019 © 2019 Ahmet Selçuk Akgül Abstract As of this writing (2019), many Muslim-majority countries face critical problems of authoritarianism, fundamentalism, violence, corruption, and poverty. The Jasmine Revolution of 2011, which many hoped would result in peace and democracy in the Arab world, instead brought chaos and violence, eventually dragging Syria into a still-ongoing civil war. One of the most worrying issues centers on Muslim youth who are grappling with problems in their respective countries but they have no inspiring role models. These youth are seeking viable alternatives, a “way out” of their accumulated anger and frustration. In the absence of such alternatives, some fall prey to extremist groups like ISIS.
    [Show full text]