Introduction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Introduction Title: Daring Missions of World War II Author: William B. Breuer ISBN: 0-471-40419-5 Introduction World war ii, the mightiest endeavor that history has known, was fought in many arenas other than by direct confrontation between opposing forces. One of the most significant of these extra dimensions was a secret war-within-a-war that raged behind enemy lines, a term that refers to actions taken a short dis- tance to the rear of an adversary’s battlefield positions or as far removed as a foe’s capital or major headquarters. Relentlessly, both sides sought to penetrate each other’s domain to dig out intelligence, plant rumors, gain a tactical advantage, spread propaganda, create confusion, or inflict mayhem. Many ingenious techniques were employed to infiltrate an antagonist’s territory, including a platoon of German troops dressed as women refugees and pushing baby carriages filled with weapons to spearhead the invasion of Belgium. Germans also wore Dutch uniforms to invade Holland. The Nazi attack against Poland was preceded by German soldiers dressed as civilians and by others wearing Polish uniforms. In North Africa, British sol- diers masqueraded as Germans to strike at enemy airfields, and both sides dressed as Arabs on occasion. One British officer in Italy disguised himself as an Italian colonel to get inside a major German headquarters and steal vital information. In the Pacific, an American sergeant of Japanese descent put on a Japan- ese officer’s uniform, sneaked behind opposing lines, and brought back thir- teen enemy soldiers who had obeyed his order to lay down their weapons. Near the end of the conflict in Europe, Germans wearing American garb and riding in American jeeps, trucks, and tanks created enormous panic in the Allied camp during the Battle of the Bulge. Other than infiltration by foot, during the war both sides used a wide variety of conveyances to get behind enemy lines: folding canoes, two-man sub- marines, human torpedoes, fishing trawlers, trucks, frogmen, jeeps, horses, mules, parachutes, gliders, and even a train. Not all ventures behind enemy lines were planned. Often individuals and groups were cut off to the rear of an opposing force and had to utilize clever methods for escaping, including eight GIs who got back through Ger- man lines dressed as French policemen. Escapes from prisoner-of-war camps and holdovers far to the rear of the front were not uncommon, but in most instances, the escapers were recap- tured. There were amazing exceptions, however, including a French general in 1 2 Introduction his sixties who fled in civilian garb and three GIs who spent eight days trapped in an attic of a small house without food or water with German soldiers occu- pying the first floor. Spies were integral components of the war-within-a-war. Many of these bold people were caught and executed. Women played a key role in espionage activities, including several who organized and directed underground escape lines that saved hundreds of downed Allied airmen in Nazi-occupied Europe. Many books have been published relating to high-level strategic designs and episodes of heroism on the battlefield, in the air, and at sea during World War II. This volume helps fill a reportorial void: a comprehensive focus on capers behind enemy lines, many of which were so bizarre or illogical that their telling would have been rejected by Hollywood as implausible—yet they happened. Part One Darkness Falls over Europe Post Office Shoot-Out Launches a War During the first half of 1939, an atmosphere of foreboding hovered over Europe. There was the sense of an approaching storm. A revered British figure, Winston S. Churchill, who had held a number of cabinet posts but was now out of politics, warned that “ferocious passions” were “rife in Europe.” He was referring to Adolf Hitler and his Nazi cohorts in Berlin. The preparations for war were everywhere in England, and in London, the high-pitched moans of air-raid sirens were heard for the first time as defense officials tested the nation’s early warning system against attack by the powerful Luftwaffe. At the same time, another force was at work, this one invisible to the eye. For many months, Admiral Wilhelm Canaris, chief of the Abwehr, Germany’s intelligence agency, had been feeding a stream of accurate reports on the mil- itary and political situation in the Third Reich to MI-6, Great Britain’s secret service for foreign operations. Canaris was a leader of the Schwarze Kapelle (Black Orchestra), the conspiracy of prominent Germans pledged to curb or halt Hitler’s dream of conquest. Soon after the führer sent his booted legions to gobble up defenseless Czechoslovakia in March 1939, Canaris implemented a new strategy in an effort to prod Great Britain into taking action against the Reich. Now he ceased sending factual reports and planted false information on MI-6. On April 3, Canaris, a small, nervous man, stated that Hitler might send his Luftwaffe to attack the Royal Navy, Great Britain’s first line of defense. A second haunting report “disclosed” that German U-boats were prowling in the English Channel and even penetrating far up the Thames Estuary, the water passage to London. This time, the crafty German master spy got action, minimal as it may have been. Lord Stanhope, the first lord of the Admiralty, swallowed the bait. That same day, he gave orders for the fleet to “man the antiaircraft guns” and “be ready for anything that might happen.” Yet another false report planted by Canaris stated that Hitler planned to launch a war against Great Britain by a sneak bombing raid on London. This 5 6 Darkness Falls over Europe time, the wily admiral overplayed his hand. When none of his concocted scenarios developed, he lost credibility with MI-6 and other British leaders. Many in London believed, wrongly, that the admiral was hatching these fanci- ful tales as part of a devious Hitler deception scheme to mask the führer’s true intentions. Meanwhile in early 1939, Hitler was preparing to launch Fall Weiss (Case White), the code name for a massive invasion of neighboring Poland. Army ranks were swelled by new men called up for “summer training.” The great German armament works were humming, turning out guns, tanks, air- planes, and ships. The führer’s highly capable general staff had put together an invasion plan which could be spearheaded by the infiltration of a large number of Ger- mans behind Polish lines to create confusion, sabotage key facilities, and pro- tect bridges needed for the advancing panzers. Earlier, notice had gone out from the Heer (army) that volunteers were being accepted for a special commando-type unit. It was headed by Oberst (Colonel) Theodor von Hippel, head of Section II, the intelligence branch responsible for clandestine operations. Within a few weeks, Hippel organized a force of picked men, who were chosen not only for their combat skills, but also for their resourcefulness and fluency in at least one foreign language. This project was designated top secret. To mask the true function of this crack outfit, it was designated Lehr und Bau Kompagnie (Special Duty Training and Construction Company). Its head- quarters was in the old Prussian city of Brandenburg, giving the organization the name it would carry during the war—the Brandenburgers. Specific mis- sions for the outfit would be decided by the high command, Oberkommando der Wehrmacht. On a large country estate outside Brandenburg, the future commandos were taught the techniques of stealth and individual sufficiency, how to move silently through woods, live off the land, and navigate by the stars. They learned to handle parachutes, kayaks, and skis, and how to create explosives from potash, flour, and sugar. The first real test of the Brandenburgers came in mid-1939 when small parties of these men, disguised as coal miners and laborers, began stealing into Poland and infiltrating the mines, factories, and electric power stations. Hitler, in essence, had a large covert sabotage force deep behind Polish lines along the frontier. X-Day for Case White was set for September 1, 1939, but the conflict that would become known as World War II erupted a half hour ahead of the scheduled kickoff. Curiously, participants on both sides in this opening round would be wearing civilian clothes, not military uniforms. On the evening of August 31, a group of Brandenburgers in civilian dis- guise prepared to go into action in the Baltic port of Danzig, which the victors Wiping Out Hitler’s Spy Network 7 of the First World War had awarded to Poland to prevent that country from being landlocked. At 4:17 A.M. on X-Day, the Brandenburgers surrounded the Danzig post office and demanded its surrender. The Polish postal workers were armed, and a shoot-out erupted that would rage all day. While the gunfire was in progress at the post office, the German battle- ship Schleswig-Hohlstein, supposedly in the harbor on a goodwill visit, began blasting targets in Danzig at point-blank range. It may have been the only instance in history where a warship, in essence, got behind enemy lines on a combat mission. By nightfall, Danzig—and its post office—were in German hands. At the same time, Brandenburgers who had been working as civilians inside Poland collected the explosives smuggled in from Germany in recent weeks and blew up the key facilities where they had been employed. Elsewhere, other Brandenburgers slipped across the frontier from Ger- many, got behind Polish defensive positions, and seized the crucial Vistula River bridges. At five o’clock in the morning, five German armies plunged across the border with the panzer spearheads charging over the Vistula spans secured by the Brandenburgers.
Recommended publications
  • Stony Brook University
    SSStttooonnnyyy BBBrrrooooookkk UUUnnniiivvveeerrrsssiiitttyyy The official electronic file of this thesis or dissertation is maintained by the University Libraries on behalf of The Graduate School at Stony Brook University. ©©© AAAllllll RRRiiiggghhhtttsss RRReeessseeerrrvvveeeddd bbbyyy AAAuuuttthhhooorrr... Invasions, Insurgency and Interventions: Sweden’s Wars in Poland, Prussia and Denmark 1654 - 1658. A Dissertation Presented by Christopher Adam Gennari to The Graduate School in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Stony Brook University May 2010 Copyright by Christopher Adam Gennari 2010 Stony Brook University The Graduate School Christopher Adam Gennari We, the dissertation committee for the above candidate for the Doctor of Philosophy degree, hereby recommend acceptance of this dissertation. Ian Roxborough – Dissertation Advisor, Professor, Department of Sociology. Michael Barnhart - Chairperson of Defense, Distinguished Teaching Professor, Department of History. Gary Marker, Professor, Department of History. Alix Cooper, Associate Professor, Department of History. Daniel Levy, Department of Sociology, SUNY Stony Brook. This dissertation is accepted by the Graduate School """"""""" """"""""""Lawrence Martin "" """""""Dean of the Graduate School ii Abstract of the Dissertation Invasions, Insurgency and Intervention: Sweden’s Wars in Poland, Prussia and Denmark. by Christopher Adam Gennari Doctor of Philosophy in History Stony Brook University 2010 "In 1655 Sweden was the premier military power in northern Europe. When Sweden invaded Poland, in June 1655, it went to war with an army which reflected not only the state’s military and cultural strengths but also its fiscal weaknesses. During 1655 the Swedes won great successes in Poland and captured most of the country. But a series of military decisions transformed the Swedish army from a concentrated, combined-arms force into a mobile but widely dispersed force.
    [Show full text]
  • Guides to German Records Microfilmed at Alexandria, Va
    GUIDES TO GERMAN RECORDS MICROFILMED AT ALEXANDRIA, VA. No. 32. Records of the Reich Leader of the SS and Chief of the German Police (Part I) The National Archives National Archives and Records Service General Services Administration Washington: 1961 This finding aid has been prepared by the National Archives as part of its program of facilitating the use of records in its custody. The microfilm described in this guide may be consulted at the National Archives, where it is identified as RG 242, Microfilm Publication T175. To order microfilm, write to the Publications Sales Branch (NEPS), National Archives and Records Service (GSA), Washington, DC 20408. Some of the papers reproduced on the microfilm referred to in this and other guides of the same series may have been of private origin. The fact of their seizure is not believed to divest their original owners of any literary property rights in them. Anyone, therefore, who publishes them in whole or in part without permission of their authors may be held liable for infringement of such literary property rights. Library of Congress Catalog Card No. 58-9982 AMERICA! HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION COMMITTEE fOR THE STUDY OP WAR DOCUMENTS GUIDES TO GERMAN RECOBDS MICROFILMED AT ALEXAM)RIA, VA. No* 32» Records of the Reich Leader of the SS aad Chief of the German Police (HeiehsMhrer SS und Chef der Deutschen Polizei) 1) THE AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION (AHA) COMMITTEE FOR THE STUDY OF WAE DOCUMENTS GUIDES TO GERMAN RECORDS MICROFILMED AT ALEXANDRIA, VA* This is part of a series of Guides prepared
    [Show full text]
  • Dokumentation Das Letzte Duell. Die
    Dokumentation Horst Mühleisen Das letzte Duell. Die Auseinandersetzungen zwischen Heydrich und Canaris wegen der Revision der »Zehn Gebote« I. Die Bedeutung der Dokumente Admiral Wilhelm Franz Canaris war als Chef der Abwehr eine der Schlüsselfigu- ren des Zweiten Weltkrieges. Rätselhaftes umgibt noch heute, mehr als fünfzig Jah- re nach seinem gewaltsamen Ende, diesen Mann. Für Erwin Lahousen, einen sei- ner engsten Mitarbeiter, war Canaris »eine Person des reinen Intellekts«1. Die Qua- lifikationsberichte über den Fähnrich z.S. im Jahre 1907 bis zum Kapitän z.S. im Jahre 1934 bestätigen dieses Urteü2. Viele Biographen versuchten, dieses abenteu- erliche und schillernde Leben zu beschreiben; nur wenigen ist es gelungen3. Un- 1 Vgl. die Aussage des Generalmajors a.D. Lahousen Edler von Vivremont (1897-1955), Dezember 1938 bis 31.7.1943 Chef der Abwehr-Abteilung II, über Canaris' Charakter am 30.11.1945, in: Der Prozeß gegen die Hauptkriegsverbrecher vor dem Internationalen Mi- litärgerichtshof (International Military Tribunal), Nürnberg, 14.11.1945-1.10.1946 (IMT), Bd 2, Nürnberg 1947, S. 489. Ders., Erinnerungsfragmente von Generalmajor a.D. Erwin Lahousen über das Amt Ausland/Abwehr (Canaris), abgeschlossen am 6.4.1948, in: Bun- desarchiv-Militärarchiv (BA-MA) Freiburg, MSg 1/2812, S. 64. Vgl. auch Ernst von Weiz- säcker, Erinnerungen, München, Leipzig, Freiburg i.Br. 1952, S. 175. 2 Vgl. Personalakte Wilhelm Canaris, in: BA-MA, Pers 6/105, fol. 1Γ-105Γ, teilweise ediert von Helmut Krausnick, Aus den Personalakten von Canaris, in: Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte (VfZG), 10 (1962), S. 280-310. Eine weitere Personalakte, eine Nebenakte, in: BA-MA, Pers 6/2293.
    [Show full text]
  • A Counterintelligence Reader, Volume 2 Chapter 1, CI in World
    CI in World War II 113 CHAPTER 1 Counterintelligence In World War II Introduction President Franklin Roosevelts confidential directive, issued on 26 June 1939, established lines of responsibility for domestic counterintelligence, but failed to clearly define areas of accountability for overseas counterintelligence operations" The pressing need for a decision in this field grew more evident in the early months of 1940" This resulted in consultations between the President, FBI Director J" Edgar Hoover, Director of Army Intelligence Sherman Miles, Director of Naval Intelligence Rear Admiral W"S" Anderson, and Assistant Secretary of State Adolf A" Berle" Following these discussions, Berle issued a report, which expressed the Presidents wish that the FBI assume the responsibility for foreign intelligence matters in the Western Hemisphere, with the existing military and naval intelligence branches covering the rest of the world as the necessity arose" With this decision of authority, the three agencies worked out the details of an agreement, which, roughly, charged the Navy with the responsibility for intelligence coverage in the Pacific" The Army was entrusted with the coverage in Europe, Africa, and the Canal Zone" The FBI was given the responsibility for the Western Hemisphere, including Canada and Central and South America, except Panama" The meetings in this formative period led to a proposal for the organization within the FBI of a Special Intelligence Service (SIS) for overseas operations" Agreement was reached that the SIS would act
    [Show full text]
  • Full List of Files Released L C P First Date Last Date Scope/Content
    Full list of files released L C P First Date Last Date Scope/Content Former Ref Note KV 2 WORLD WAR II KV 2 German Intelligence Agents and Suspected Agents KV 2 3386 06/03/1935 18/08/1953 Greta Lydia OSWALD: Swiss. Imprisoned in PF 45034 France on grounds of spying for Germany in 1935, OSWALD was said to be working for the Gestapo in 1941 KV 2 3387 12/11/1929 12/01/1939 Oscar Vladimirovich GILINSKY alias PF 46098 JILINSKY, GILINTSIS: Latvian. An arms dealer VOL 1 in Paris, in 1937 GILINSKY was purchasing arms for the Spanish Popular Front on behalf of the Soviet Government. In November 1940 he was arrested by the Germans in Paris but managed to obtain an exit permit. He claimed he achieved this by bribing individual Germans but, after ISOS material showed he was regarded as an Abwehr agent, he was removed in Trinidad from a ship bound for Buenos Aires and brought to Camp 020 for interrogation. He was deported in 1946 KV 2 3388 13/01/1939 16/02/1942 Oscar Vladimirovich GILINSKY alias PF 46098 JILINSKY, GILINTSIS: Latvian. An arms dealer VOL 2 in Paris, in 1937 GILINSKY was purchasing arms for the Spanish Popular Front on behalf of the Soviet Government. In November 1940 he was arrested by the Germans in Paris but managed to obtain an exit permit. He claimed he achieved this by bribing individual Germans but, after ISOS material showed he was regarded as an Abwehr agent, he was removed in Trinidad from a ship bound for Buenos Aires and brought to Camp 020 for interrogation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Round Tablette October 2006
    The Round Tablette November 2006 Volume 15 Number 3 Published by WW II History Roundtable a glowing report to his government after Edited by Jim Gerber meeting Oshima, the designated military attaché to Germany, in March 1934. Colonel Welcome to the November meeting of Oshima “belongs to the inner circle of the Dr. Harold C. Deutsch World War Two Japan’s military…and therefore is very well History Roundtable. As is our usual practice, informed about everything connected with tonight is the annual Dr. Deutsch lecture. the militarists and their plans for the Tonight’ guest speaker is author Carl Boyd. future.” Oshima arrived in Berlin in May His topic is: The Relations Between Nazi 1934 to take up his post. Germany and Imperial Japan. Oshima initially started working with The following overview is taken from Wilhelm Canaris, head of the German material provided by Mr. Boyd. central military intelligence service, but soon exceeded his military orders by becoming Relations Between Nazi Germany and secretly engaged in political discussions Imperial Japan. leading to the highest levels in the German government. These discussions included What could possibly enable such two Joachim von Ribbentrop, Hitler’s personal decidedly different societies as Japan and ambassador at large, in the spring of 1935, Germany to come together in an axis alliance and Hitler himself in the autumn of 1935, by and fight on the same side during the Second which point Oshima was a major general. World War? They were, after all, on opposite sides of the globe; furthermore, they The growing military climate in were separated by racial differences, major Japan was eroding the influence of civilian religious differences, vast cultural forces in government.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Analysis of German Operational Intelligence Part II
    UNCLASSIFIED Critical Analysis of German Operational Intelligence Part II Sources of Intelligence work, and many German field orders stress the impor­ tance of the capture, preservation, and quick evalua­ The study of sources and types of intelligence tion of enemy documents; but they paid scant atten­ available to the Germans shows clearly how the inher­ tion to adequate training of personnel, and no ent weaknesses· of their intelligence system extended outstanding work seems to have been done. During the to their detailed work. The insufficient importance second half of the war, the amount of captured they attributed to intelligence meant that all its documents in German hands decreased, owing to the branches suffered from shortage of personnel and nature of their defensive warfare, and the opportunity equipment; and, although in some fields there was an for good document work became fewer. approach to German thoroughness, in the main the That the Germans were capable of good detailed lack of attention to detail was surprising. work is shown by their practice in the Internment The interrogation of prisoners of war, which they Center for Captured Air Force Personnel at Oberursel, regarded as one of their most fruitful sources of where all Allied air crews were first interrogated. The information, is a good example. In the beginning of German specialists here realized the value of combined the war, their need for detailed and comprehensive document and interrogation work, and devised an interrogation was small; but even later, a standard excellent system of analysis. In order to identify the OKH questionnaire was still being used and at no time units of their prisoners - a matter of the highest was much initiative shown on the part of interrogators.
    [Show full text]
  • The Abwehr : from German Espionage Agency, to Centre of Resistance Against Hitler Student: Greg Elder Sponsor: Dr
    The Abwehr : From German espionage agency, to centre of resistance against Hitler Student: Greg Elder Sponsor: Dr. Vasilis Vourkoutiotis The Project: About the Abwehr: My research for Dr. Vourkoutiotis has mainly involved searching the microfilmed finding-aids for the German The name “Abwehr” in German can be translated literally as Captured Records archive located in Washington, D.C. The task requires me to scan the microfilmed data sheets “defence.” However, despite its name, the Abwehr became one of for information relevant to the project, and then summarize that info for the Professor. The process has greatly the forefront intelligence gathering establishments in Nazi Germany. familiarized me with the everyday work of a professional historian, and some of the necessary research steps for The organization was tasked with gathering information on the a historical monograph. The project has also furthered my knowledge of German history, especially regarding country’s enemies, primarily using field-based agents. The Abwehr the different espionage organizations at work during World War II. fell under the administration of the Oberkommando der Wehrmacht (Supreme Command of the Armed Forces) and interacted heavily This work is in preparation for Dr. Vourkoutiotis’s eventual trip to the archives in Washington D.C. where he will with other German espionage agencies such as the locate the important documents relating to the Abwehr. The research completed by myself in Ottawa will enable Sicherheitsdienst (Security Service of the SS and Nazi Party). him to visit the archives already aware of what relevant documents exist, and where to begin in his search for primary sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Emancipation? Women in Modern European History
    s University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Department of History HIST / WMST / EURO 259: TOWARDS EMANCIPATION? WOMEN IN MODERN EUROPEAN HISTORY Syllabus – Spring 2018 Instructor: Prof. Karen Hagemann TIME OF THE COURSE: TUESDAY & THURSDAY: 11:00 AM - 12:15 PM ROOM: TBA Office Hours: Tuesday: 1:00 - 3:00 PM or by appointment Office: Hamilton Hall 562 Email: [email protected] 17 October 2017 HISTORY / WMST 259: Spring 2018 2 AIMS OF THE COURSE In this course we will study women's lives, work and the history of the women’s movement in modern Europe from the era of the late Enlightenment and the French Revolution to the period of the two World Wars, the Holocaust, and the Cold War. We will explore how the major political, economic, social, and cultural changes affected the lives of women from different social backgrounds and how they responded to these changes. The struggle of the women’s movement that emerged everywhere in Europe during the nineteenth century to improve the working and living conditions of women, achieve eQual civil and political rights for women and increase their social, cultural, and political influence, will thus be one central theme. We will ask how the aims and forms of this struggle for female emancipation varied between different groups and countries and changed over time. We also will examine the ways in which women were involved in wars and revolutions and experienced them. The course is organized chronologically, but as we move through time we will concentrate on the following themes: • Gender images and dominant ideas about the gender order and how they affected women’s lives • Women’s role(s) and experiences in the household, the family, and the workforce • Women’s and men’s role(s) in the ‘public spheres’ of nation, state and civil society • Women’s struggle for eQual rights in the family, society, the workforce and politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Canaris-Tagebücher - Legenden Und Wirklichkeit
    Dokumentation Horst Mühleisen Die Canaris-Tagebücher - Legenden und Wirklichkeit Kein Historiker hat sie je gesehen. Forscher, Journalisten und Staatsanwälte suchten sie nach dem Ende der nationalsozialistischen Herrschaft vergebens: die verschol- lenen Tagebücher des Admirals Wilhelm Canaris (1887-1945), für nicht wenige der Fahnder »eine ungeheuere historische Quelle«1, die Auskünfte über die Natur die- ses außergewöhnlichen, von Geheimnissen und Rätseln umgebenen Mannes hätten geben können, der einst als Chef des Amtes Ausland/Abwehr von November 1939 bis Februar 1944 Beschützer des konservativen Widerstandes gewesen war. Das Schicksal der Canaris-Papiere beschäftigt die historische Forschung, seit ein SS-Standgericht im Konzentrationslager Flossenbürg den ehemaligen Abwehr- chef am 8. April 1945 wegen angeblichen Hochverrats zum Tode verurteilte und ihn in den frühen Morgenstunden des folgenden Tages erhängen ließ. Mit dem Ende von Canaris verlor sich auch die Spur seiner geheimen Tagebücher und Reise- berichte, die Walter Huppenkothen, Ankläger von Canaris im Prozess, führender Funktionär der Geheimen Staatspolizei, restlos verbrannt hat, wenn man seine Aussagen glauben will. Einige, meist Canaris' Getreue der einstigen Abwehr, taten es nicht. Sie glaubten hartnäckig daran, dass ihr listiger Chef doch Wege gefunden hatte, eine bis dahin unbekannte Kopie seiner Tagebücher an einem entlegenen Ort in Sicherheit zu bringen; und das rasch aufkommende Gerücht, die Geheime Staatspolizei habe keineswegs alle Canaris-Papiere verbrannt, bestärkte
    [Show full text]
  • Living Rules Nov 2010 
    The Caucasus Campaign 1942 — Living Rules Nov 2010 JULY–NOVEMBER, 1942 Living Rules — November 2010 T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S 1. Introduction. 2 14. Supply. 13 2. Contents. 2 15. Special Units. 14 3. Sequence of Play Outline. 4 16. Air and Naval Support. 15 4. The Initial Phase . 4 17. Replacements. 16 5. Stacking. 6 18. Special Rules. 16 6. Zones of Control. 6 19. How to Win. 17 7. Movement. 6 20. The Campaign Game. 17 8. Combat. 8 21. The Tournament Scenario. 17 9. Combat Modifiers . 9 Extended Example of Play. 18 10. Combat Results. 10 Hints on Play. 22 11. Retreats . 11 Historical Summary . 22 12. Advance After Combat . 12 Designer’s Notes and Credits. 23 13. Mobile Assaults. 12 Index. 24 © 2009 GMT Games, LLC • P.O. Box 1308, Hanford, CA 93232-1308 • www.GMTGames.com © 2009 GMT Games, LLC The Caucasus Campaign 1942 — Living Rules Nov 2010 . INTRODUCTION . How to Read the Units The Caucasus Campaign is a game covering the Axis invasion of Attack Strength: is the strength the unit contributes when attacking. the Caucasus during the year 1942. The game starts after the capture A number in a yellow box means the unit provides an Armor Shift of Rostov and ends in the middle of November when the Soviet in both attack and defense. Superscript number is used for Mountain Offensive to the north, at Stalingrad, starts. One player controls the and Forest combat. Axis forces, the other the Soviet forces. Defense Strength: is the strength the unit contributes when defend- Scale: One hex = 18 miles (29 kilometers).
    [Show full text]
  • Dirty-Little-Secrets
    DIRTY LITTLE SECRETS OF WORLD WAR II ALSO BY JAMES F. DUNNIGAN AND ALBERT A. NOFI Dirty Little Secrets ALSO BY JAMES F. DUNNIGAN How to Stop a War (with William Martel) A Quick and Dirty Guide to War (with Austin Bay) How to Make War The Complete Wargames Handbook Getting It Right (with Raymond M. Macedonia) ALSO BY ALBERT A. NOFI The Alamo and the Texas War for Independence The Civil War Treasury Eyewitness History of the Civil War The Gettysburg Campaign Napoleon at War The War Against Hitler: Military Strategy in the West DIRTY LITTLE SECRETS OF WORLD WAR II Military Information No One Told You About the Greatest, Most Terrible War in History James F. Dunnigan and Albert A. Nofi QUILL WILLIAM MORROW New York Copyright © 1994 by James F. Dunnigan and Albert A. Nofi All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the Publisher. Inquiries should be addressed to Permissions Department, William Morrow and Company, Inc., 1350 Avenue of the Americas, New York, N.Y. 10019. It is the policy of William Morrow and Company, Inc., and its imprints and affiliates, recognizing the importance of preserving what has been written, to print the books we publish on acid-free paper, and we exert our best efforts to that end. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Dunnigan, James F. Dirty little secrets of World War II / James F.
    [Show full text]