Burroughs 1 the Republican Threat

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Burroughs 1 the Republican Threat Burroughs 1 The Republican Threat: How Protestant Anxieties and Republican Plotting Destabilized Northern Ireland By Kimberly Burroughs Advised by Professor Harland-Jacobs April 16, 2012 Burroughs 2 Table of Contents Introduction 1 Chapter 1: Republican Conspiracy 5 Chapter 2: The Civil Rights Movement Begins 13 Chapter 3: A Turn to Mass Demonstration 20 Chapter 4: The Real Republican Threat 29 Chapter 5: Internment 41 Conclusion 51 Burroughs 3 I would like to thank Professor Jessica Harland-Jacobs for her invaluable guidance and support throughout this project. I would also like to thank my family for always encouraging me to pursue my passions. Burroughs 4 Introduction The British occupation of Ireland began in the twelfth century and persisted until 1921. Over eight hundred years of British rule, imperial policies segmented the island into distinct cultural regions. The residents of the northern Ulster province strongly identified with British culture (and Protestantism), while southern Irish Catholics, exploited economically by centuries of British rule, rejected the Empire. By the early twentieth century the regions had established imagined communities based on these opposing ideologies. Southern nationalists (frequently Catholic) increasingly agitated for Irish independence, while Northern Protestants desperately clung to union with Britain, fearing absorption into an alienating Catholic state. Tensions between Unionists (who wanted to remain within the British Empire) and Nationalists would prompt violence as these two communities, feeling intrinsically at odds with each other, clashed over the future of Ireland. In 1916 a small band of Irish nationalists in the city of Dublin launched an uprising now known as the Easter Rising. Aware of the high-likelihood of failure, the revolutionaries martyred themselves in an effort to galvanize Irish Nationalists into revolution. Their ploy worked. The British brutally mistreated the rebels, exciting the passions of Catholic sympathizers and setting the stage for revolution. The island erupted into war from 1919-1921, which produced the Irish Republican Army, a militant Nationalist organization designed to defend Catholic communities and bring about an independent Irish Republic entirely free of British interference. Acknowledging the potency of nationalist resistance, which was largely concentrated in the southern portion of the island, the British ended the war in 1921 with the Anglo-Irish Treaty. The treaty partitioned the island into a two separate entities, the Irish Free State, composed of the 26 southern counties, and Northern Ireland, home to the Unionist Protestant ascendancy that had Burroughs 5 maintained a strong hold of the region since the first serious British efforts to colonize the island. Thus Britain attempted to ease Protestant/Catholic tensions by appeasing both parties. It granted Irish Nationalists many of their demands and secured for Unionists the protection of a cultural majority in the province of Northern Ireland, which would remain within the United Kingdom. However, a large portion of the Republican movement, which had demanded freedom for the entire island, viewed Anglo-Irish Treaty and partition as a failure. In 1922 militant sections of the Irish Republican Army launched a civil war against Irish political leaders who had accepted the terms of the 1921 treaty. Although anti-partition forces were defeated and the border remained, Republicans continued to threaten the region without success for the next forty years. After decades of relative peace in which the Unionist ascendancy secured its position in the North and the southern Republic struggled to gain its footing, Northern Ireland devolved into a guerilla war that would take over three thousands lives from1969 to 2003. How did this war begin? Who was responsible? How did conflicting interest groups change the course of Irish history, and how might they have avoided violence? In an attempt to answer these questions, this paper focuses on the Catholic civil rights movement of 1962-1971 to ascertain how sectarian divisions emerging from Ireland’s colonial history promoted the misunderstandings, suspicions, and mistrust that ultimately led to violence. Three key ideologies are fundamental to understanding the communal differences that would instigate this violence. The first is Unionism, a political persuasion held by residents of Northern Ireland who wish to remain within United Kingdom. Unionism is largely associated with Protestantism and Britishness. It corresponds to the Protestant Ascendancy of the sixteenth century, which reaped most of the benefits from participating in Britain’s colonial program. The Burroughs 6 second is Irish Nationalism, which largely but not exclusively corresponds to Irish Catholicism.1 Nationalists agitated for the increased autonomy of colonized Irish people through cultural movements like the Gaelic revival of the nineteenth century and through armed uprisings against colonial rule. The third and perhaps the most important ideology relevant to twentieth century Irish history is Republicanism, which emerged during the late 1800s and is largely associated with the Irish Republican Army. Republicanism, an extreme form of Nationalism, calls for the complete dismantling of all British influence over the island of Ireland and the establishment of a unified Irish republic under exclusive Irish sovereignty. The term “Republican” would become inextricably linked to militarism throughout the 1900s. Republicanism represented the most alarming threat to Unionists because it explicitly and violently opposed the existence of Northern Ireland, its Protestant Ascendancy and its neo-colonialism. This paper makes two related arguments concerning the sectarian divisions of the civil rights movement. First, to an artificially constructed and anxious Protestant majority, the Catholic civil rights movement appeared to be another iteration of Republican plotting. Fearing imprisonment within a Catholic republic, which would represent the antithesis of Protestant beliefs, Unionists reacted to the civil rights movement with fearful anxiety, leading extremist elements to engage in terrorism and violence. As a result, Protestant Unionists and their radical constituents ultimately brought about the very Republican threat they so feared by alienating the Catholic population, producing similarly beleaguered sentiments and prompting an embrace of Republican militarism. While this cyclic model of oppositional tension is not remarkably original, most scholars fail to acknowledge the validity of initial Protestant anxieties and construe Unionists as irrational. 1 Nationalist sentiments would also attract Labor movements, Socialists, and Communists who, like Catholic Nationalists, rejected the status quo. Socialists and Communists would apply a Marxist formula to the Northern Ireland situation that would call for proletarian resistance. They were a key factor in civil rights agitation. Burroughs 7 This historiographical failure introduces the second argument of this paper. An autobiography of Roy H.W. Johnston released in 2004 reveals that Unionists’ fears were not entirely groundless.2 While Republicans never exercised unilateral control over the civil rights movement, they did maintain a constant presence within it, exerting indirect influence over its leadership and pushing it in certain directions. While Protestants grossly overestimated the power of the Irish Republican Army, a persistent Republican presence within the movement did reinforce Unionist anxieties. This paper further develops the neglected elements of the Protestant anxiety thesis by juxtaposing both Republican and Unionist source material, including political pamphlets, speeches, and declassified government documents, in an effort to trace the co- evolution of communal tensions. To make these arguments, this paper explores the narrative of events from 1964-1971. Chapter One consults Johnston’s autobiography and demonstrates the real (although weak) Republican threat emanating from the civil rights movement. Chapter Two unpacks the nature of Protestant anxieties at the time, noting their consequences at both a grass roots and parliamentary level. Chapter Three traces the first political demonstrations of the civil rights movement. Chapter Four explores the consequences these demonstrations, noting that that they were integral to solidifying sectarian tensions and radicalizing the conflict. Five reveals how this sectarianism infiltrated the upper echelons of Stormont governance and led to the fatal error of internment. This final misstep sealed the fate of Northern Ireland, making a non-violent solution impossible in the wake of insurmountable communal tension. 2 Roy H.W. Johnston, Century of Endeavour: A Biographical and Autobiographical View of the 20th Century in Ireland (Bethesda: Academica Press, 2004). Johnston’s book is an anomaly among historical texts. Johnston himself was a Republican insider throughout the crisis with access a variety of documents that remain inaccessible to the general public. In his book, Johnston has attempted to synthesize these documents into an internal narrative of Republican activities throughout the civil rights movement. It remains one of the few sources in existence that allow scholars access into the internal events of Republican circles at the time. Burroughs 8 Chapter 1: Republican Conspiracy Following the partition of Ireland in 1921, Republicans fixated on the border issue.3 For the
Recommended publications
  • John F. Morrison Phd Thesis
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by St Andrews Research Repository 'THE AFFIRMATION OF BEHAN?' AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE POLITICISATION PROCESS OF THE PROVISIONAL IRISH REPUBLICAN MOVEMENT THROUGH AN ORGANISATIONAL ANALYSIS OF SPLITS FROM 1969 TO 1997 John F. Morrison A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2010 Full metadata for this item is available in Research@StAndrews:FullText at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/3158 This item is protected by original copyright ‘The Affirmation of Behan?’ An Understanding of the Politicisation Process of the Provisional Irish Republican Movement Through an Organisational Analysis of Splits from 1969 to 1997. John F. Morrison School of International Relations Ph.D. 2010 SUBMISSION OF PHD AND MPHIL THESES REQUIRED DECLARATIONS 1. Candidate’s declarations: I, John F. Morrison, hereby certify that this thesis, which is approximately 82,000 words in length, has been written by me, that it is the record of work carried out by me and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree. I was admitted as a research student in September 2005 and as a candidate for the degree of Ph.D. in May, 2007; the higher study for which this is a record was carried out in the University of St Andrews between 2005 and 2010. Date 25-Aug-10 Signature of candidate 2. Supervisor’s declaration: I hereby certify that the candidate has fulfilled the conditions of the Resolution and Regulations appropriate for the degree of Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Previous Attempts to Bring Peace to Northern Ireland Have Failed. What Problems Need to Be Overcome So Devolution and Peace Can Succeed in Northern Ireland?
    Previous attempts to bring peace to Northern Ireland have failed. What problems need to be overcome so devolution and peace can succeed in Northern Ireland? So what are the problems? Paramilitaries – Loyalist and Republican terrorists are fighting a war against each other. Unionist and Nationalist politicians find it hard to discuss peace when the other side is killing their people. Partition – Both sides want different things. Nationalists want a Free and independent Ireland. Unionists want Northern Ireland to remain part of the UK. British and Irish governments – There was a great deal of mistrust between Dublin and London until 1985. Distrust – Unionists/Protestants and Nationalists/Catholics do not trust each other. Economic and Social problems. Poor schooling, housing and amenities need investment. Who gets the investment first. High Unemployment is caused by lack of companies and businesses willing to invest in Northern Ireland whilst the Troubles continue. America was funding the IRA and Sinn Fein. Weapon decommissioning and the end of violence. The arrest and detainment of innocent Catholics. Orange Marches and RUC seen as offensive to Nationalists. Civil Rights. Different opinions amongst the Unionists and Nationalists. DUP vs UUP. Sinn Fein vs SDLP. Obstacles to Peace - Politics During the Troubles, the media reports of bombs and shootings gave people outside Northern Ireland the impression that Northern Ireland was a war zone. It seemed to have no normal life and no normal politics either. This was not the case. There were 'normal' political parties in Northern Ireland, and most people supported them. All the parties had views and policies relating to a wide range of 'normal' issues such as education, health care and housing.
    [Show full text]
  • 5.IRL Politics and Society in Northern Ireland |Sample Answer Would You Agree That Terence O'neill And/Or Brian Faulkner Failed As a Political Leader?
    5.IRL Politics and Society in Northern Ireland | Sample answer Would you agree that Terence O’Neill and/or Brian Faulkner failed as a political leader? Argue your case. (2018) Brian Faulkner became Prime Minister of Northern Ireland in March 1971 after Chichester-Clarke’s resignation. During his time as Prime Minister the IRA intensified their campaign. In an effort to stem the violence, Faulkner introduced internment in April 1971. The policy was a disaster. It increased nationalist grievances and won support for the republican cause. After Bloody Sunday, 30th January 1972, the British government lost faith in Faulkner’s ability to restore order in Northern Ireland and introduced direct rule, suspending the Stormont Government. This essay aims to examine how Brian Faulkner failed as a political leader. Brian Faulkner was born in Co. Down in 1921. He was elected to Stormont as MP for East Down in 1949; he was appointed Minister for Health Affairs in 1959. Following the resignation of Lord Brookeborough as Prime Minister in 1963, Faulkner was seen as a likely candidate to succeed him. However, he lost out to Terence O’Neill. Faulkner served under O’Neill as Minister for Commerce and excelled in stimulating economic growth. Faulkner resigned from the cabinet in January 1969 in protest of O’Neill’s intention to reform local government, particularly the one man one vote. He finally became Prime Minister in March 1971. While his career ended in failure, Faulkner’s strengths saw him successfully manoeuvre between demands from Unionists and Nationalists. He worked efficiently to strike a balance between the demands of ordinary unionists and the demands of the British for concessions to nationalists.
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Political Review, January, 2011
    Of Morality & Corruption Ireland & Israel Another PD Budget! Brendan Clifford Philip O'Connor Labour Comment page 16 page 23 back page IRISH POLITICAL REVIEW January 2011 Vol.26, No.1 ISSN 0790-7672 and Northern Star incorporating Workers' Weekly Vol.25 No.1 ISSN 954-5891 Economic Mindgames Irish Budget 2011 To Default or Not to Default? that is the question facing the Irish democracy at present. In normal circumstances this would be Should Ireland become the first Euro-zone country to renege on its debts? The bank debt considered an awful budget. But the cir- in question has largely been incurred by private institutions of the capitalist system, cumstances are not normal. Our current which. made plenty money for themselves when times were good—which adds a budget deficit has ballooned to 11.6% of piquancy to the choice ahead. GDP (Gross Domestic Product) excluding As Irish Congress of Trade Unions General Secretary David Begg has pointed out, the bank debt (over 30% when the once-off Banks have been reckless. The net foreign debt of the Irish banking sector was 10% of bank recapitalisation is taken into account). Gross Domestic Product in 2003. By 2008 it had risen to 60%. And he adds: "They lied Our State debt to GDP is set to increase to about their exposure" (Irish Times, 13.12.10). just over 100% in the coming years. A few When the world financial crisis sapped investor confidence, and cut off the supply of years ago our State debt was one of the funds to banks across the world, the Irish banks threatened to become insolvent as private lowest, but now it is one of the highest, institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • From Deference to Defiance: Popular Unionism and the Decline of Elite Accommodation in Northern Ireland
    From Deference to Defiance: Popular Unionism and the Decline of Elite Accommodation in Northern Ireland Introduction On 29 November, 2003, The Ulster Unionist Party (UUP), the party that had governed Northern Ireland from Partition in 1921 to the imposition of Direct Rule by Ted Heath in 1972, lost its primary position as the leading Unionist party in the N.I. Assembly to the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) of Reverend Ian Paisley. On 5 May, 2005, the electoral revolution was completed when the DUP trounced the UUP in the Westminster elections, netting twice the UUP's popular vote, ousting David Trimble and reducing the UUP to just one Westminster seat. In March, 2005, the Orange Order, which had helped to found the UUP exactly a century before, cut its links to this ailing party. What explains this political earthquake? The press and most Northern Ireland watchers place a large amount of stress on short-term policy shifts and events. The failure of the IRA to show 'final acts' of decommissioning of weapons is fingered as the main stumbling block which prevented a re-establishment of the Northern Ireland Assembly and, with it, the credibility of David Trimble and his pro-Agreement wing of the UUP. This was accompanied by a series of incidents which demonstrated that the IRA, while it my have given up on the ‘armed struggle’ against the security forces, was still involved in intelligence gathering, the violent suppression of its opponents and a range of sophisticated criminal activities culminating in the robbery of £26 million from the Northern Bank in Belfast in December 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • New Prime Minister 1969
    Author: Anne-Marie Ryan Curriculum links: Politics and society in Northern Ireland, 1949-1993 - civil rights movement RTÉ Archives, Online exhibition: Violence in Northern Ireland 1969 - New prime minister, 1969 Access the online exhibition here. Terence O’Neill resigned as leader of the Unionist Party and prime minister of Northern Ireland in April 1969. On 1 May 1969, O’Neill’s cousin, James Chichester- Clarke, was elected as leader of the Unionist Party and became prime minister. Activity 1 Watch the video clip ‘Chichester-Clarke, New Prime Minister’ (1969) and answer the following discussion questions: • Chichester-Clarke was elected by a margin of how many votes? What does this result tell you about the state of the Unionist Party in 1969? • In general, those who had supported Terence O’Neill voted for Chichester-Clarke and those who had opposed him voted for Brian Faulkner. What does this tell you about the type of prime minister Chichester-Clarke was likely to be? Activity 2 Listen to the clip, ‘Reaction from Derry on Chichester-Clarke’ where residents of the Catholic Bogside and Protestant Fountain Street areas of Derry give their views on the election of James Chichester-Clarke as prime minister of Northern Ireland. Make notes on their views in the boxes below: Catholics from the Bogside Author: Anne-Marie Ryan Protestants from Fountain Street Based on the views expressed by the people in this audio clip, do you think that James Chichester- Clarke will be an effective prime minister of Northern Ireland? Why/why not?.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Irish Republicanism: 1962-1972
    Official Irish Republicanism: 1962-1972 By Sean Swan Front cover photo: Detail from the front cover of the United Irishman of September 1971, showing Joe McCann crouching beneath the Starry Plough flag, rifle in hand, with Inglis’ baker in flames in the background. This was part of the violence which followed in reaction to the British government’s introduction of internment without trial on 9 August 1971. Publication date 1 February 2007 Published By Lulu ISBN 978-1-4303-0798-3 © Sean Swan, 2006, 2007 The author can be contacted at [email protected] Contents Acknowledgements 6 Chapter 1. Introduction 7 Chapter 2. Context and Contradiction 31 Chapter 3. After the Harvest 71 Chapter 4. 1964-5 Problems and Solutions 119 Chapter 5. 1966-1967: Control and 159 Reaction Chapter 6: Ireland as it should be versus Ireland as it is, January 1968 to August 203 1969 Chapter 7. Defending Stormont, Defeating the EEC August 1969 to May 283 1972 Chapter 8. Conclusion 361 Appendix 406 Bibliography 413 Acknowledgements What has made this book, and the thesis on which it is based, possible is the access to the minutes and correspondence of Sinn Fein from 1962 to 1972 kindly granted me by the Ard Comhairle of the Workers’ Party. Access to the minutes of the Wolfe Tone Society and the diaries of C. Desmond Greaves granted me by Anthony Coughlan were also of tremendous value and greatly appreciated. Seamus Swan is to be thanked for his help with translation. The staff of the Linen Hall Library in Belfast, especially Kris Brown, were also very helpful.
    [Show full text]
  • Irish W 6° Democrat
    HERE IS THE PROBE GRIM TRUTH IRISH W 6° OCCUPIED DEMOCRAT No. 208 APRIL 1962 IRELAND Damning facts indict the Brookeborough Police State IRISH MARCHERS TELL ENGLAND yHE "Irish Democrat" has just carried out the most far- reaching independent enquir> into the Six Counties since 1936. The damning facts of today are exposed in a four- page supplement to this issue. Four reporters spent ten They were headed by Des- days travelling all over the mond Greaves, Editor of the area, Belfast, Newry, Derry, "Irish Democrat," with Sean Strabane, Omagh, Enniskillen, Redmond, Antony Coughlan Dungannon, bringing up-to- and Tom Redmond of Man- the-minute reports for "Irish Democrat" readers. chester. CHALLENGE \JL/E now issue a challenge to ** every British newspaper: send your reporters there; go and meet the people; talk to those the armed B-men can't intimidate; see the ctiy where a majority of two t» one gets only one-third of the CHRIS SULLIVAN council seats; find out about the refusal of jobs to Catholics; meet the businessmen who have SIX VOTES EACH, and report what BRUM'S they see without fear. The four reporters decided to walk the 265 miles from Liverpool BOGUS to London via Manchester and TONY COUGHLAN The third Irish Freedom March enters Manchester. Birmingham, In order to tell the British working olass what is be- FLAG IS ing done by the Tory Party in DEFEND OUR NEUTRALITY! occupied Ireland. FURLED OLLOWING the exposure in F the March "Irish Democrat" of how the microscopic minority DUBLIN C.N.D. CONFERENCE of Birmingham Irish who belong to manufacture or receive them.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sunningdale Agreement and Power Sharing Executive, 1973
    History Support Service Supporting Leaving Certificate History www.hist.ie Later Modern Ireland Topic 5, Politics and society in Northern Ireland, 1949-1993 Documents for case study: The Sunningdale Agreement and the power-sharing executive, 1973-1974 Contents Preface page 2 Introduction to the case study page 3 Biographical notes page 4 Glossary of key terms page 8 List of documents page 12 The documents page 13 This material is intended for educational/classroom use only and is not to be reproduced in any medium or forum without permission. Efforts have been made to trace and acknowledge copyright holders. In cases where a copyright has been inadvertently overlooked, the copyright holders are requested to contact the History Support Service administrator, Angela Thompson, at [email protected] ©2009 History Support Service, County Wexford Education Centre, Enniscorthy, Co. Wexford. Ph. 353 53 923 9121, Fax 353 53 923 9132, Email [email protected], Website www.hist.ie PREFACE The topic, Politics and society in Northern Ireland, 1949-1993, is prescribed by the State Examinations Commission (SEC) for the documents-based study for the 2010 and 2011 Leaving Certificate examinations. The case studies for the topic are: • The Coleraine University controversy • The Sunningdale Agreement and the power-sharing executive, 1973-1974 • The Apprentice Boys of Derry The set of documents selected for each of the case studies, and presented herein, is varied in nature and represents varying points of view, enabling students to look at the case study from different perspectives. Each set of documents is accompanied by an introduction which gives an outline of the case study and the relevance of each of the documents to the different aspects of the case study.
    [Show full text]
  • The Republic
    THE REPUBLIC A JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY AND HISTORICAL DEBATE No 4 Spring 2005 Editors: Finbar Cullen Aengus Ó Snodaigh Published by the Ireland Institute, 2005 Copyright © The Republic and the contributors, 2005 ISSN 1393 - 9696 Cover design: Robert Ballagh The Republic aims to provide a forum for discussion, debate and analysis of contemporary and historical issues. Irish and international matters across a range of disciplines will be addressed. Republican ideas and principles will shape and inform the contents of the journal. Our aim is to serve a general rather than a specialist readership. The opinions expressed in the articles do not necessarily represent those of the Ireland Institute. Correspondence to: The Editors, The Republic, The Ireland Institute, 27 Pearse Street, Dublin 2 or e-mail [email protected] Visit the journal's web site at http://www.republicjournal.com Cover photograph by Robert Ballagh 1916 Monument at Arbour Hill, Dublin, with Proclamation carved by Michael Biggs Layout and design by Éamon Mag Uidhir Printed by CRM Design & Print, Dublin CONTENTS Editorial 5 In Praise of ‘Hibernocentricism’: Republicanism, Globalisation and Irish Culture 7 P. J. MATHEWS Multiculturalism, Secularism, and the State 15 TARIQ MODOOD Why France, Why the Nation? 31 JULIA KRISTEVA Cultúr an Phoblachtánachais faoi Léigear 46 TOMÁS MAC SÍOMÓIN The Cultural Turn versus Economic Returns: The Production of Culture in an Information Age 60 PASCHAL PRESTON Peadar O’Donnell, ‘Real Republicanism’ and The Bell 80 LAWRENCE WILLIAM WHITE Exploding the Continuum: The Utopia of Unbroken Tradition 100 RAYMOND DEANE ‘Our songs are our laws …’—Music and the Republic (Part 2) 116 PATRICK ZUK Debate Culture, Politics and Civil Society: The Role of the Critical Journal 133 ROY JOHNSTON The Contributors 151 CULTURE IN THE REPUBLIC (PART 2) EDITORIAL EASY ASSUMPTIONS about Ireland’s sense of itself and Irish exceptionalism have not stood up well to recent developments.
    [Show full text]
  • The Troubles in Northern Ireland in the Late 1960S
    DEMOCRATIC AND POPULAR REPUBLIC OF ALGERIA MINISTARY OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH UNIVERLSITY OF ORAN ES- SENIA Faculty of Letters, Languages, & Arts Department Of Anglo- Saxon Languages, Section Of English Magister Dissertation in British Civilization The Troubles in Northern Ireland in the Late 1960s Presented by : Supervised by : Mrs. DARRAB. LAHOUARIA Dr. BOUHADIBA. ZOULIKHA The members of the Jury : Chairperson: Dr. Belmekki Belkacem Supervisor: Dr. Bouhadiba Zoulikha Examiner: Dr. Moulfi Leila Academic Year 2011-2012 E.D 2007-2008 THE TROUBLES IN NORTHERN IRELAND IN THE LATE 1960S CONTENTS Dedication ..................................................................................................................... I Acknowledgement ........................................................................................................II Abstract ........................................................................................................................III List of Abbreviations ..................................................................................................IV List of Maps ..................................................................................................................V List of Tables ................................................................................................................VI General Introduction ...................................................................................................1 CHAPTER ONE: Ireland from the Norman Invasion to the
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Evolution of the B&ICO
    Encyclopedia of Anti-Revisionism On-Line Sam Richards Notes on the evolution of the B&ICO [Written 2011: Posted 2014 Encyclopedia of Anti-Revisionism On-Line] As the Russian-Chinese ideological dispute moved towards an open breach, anti-revisionist sympathisers emerged in other Communist parties. In Britain, the first public anti-revisionist group came out of the Communist Party of Great Britain in September 1963 — the Committee to Defeat Revisionism for Communist Unity (CDRCU) — and started to publish a well produced typeset monthly paper, Vanguard. A number of Irish emigrant radicals became involved in radical left politics in London in the early Sixties. Some were former republican prisoners such as Gerry Lawless, others young northern students like Eamonn McCann and Mike Farrell. Another young emigrant who entered the milieu was from the County Cork/County Kerry borderland, Brendan Clifford. Like other Irish émigré politics in London in the early anti-revisionist struggle, Brendan Clifford was once part of the Communist Party of Great Britain. He left them in October 1963 and joined Michael McCreey’s Committee to Defeat Revisionism for Communist Unity. Elements of the London Irish left rallied to the anti-revisionist politics of the CDRCU (including Noel Jenkinson, who, as a member of the Official IRA, would be convicted for bombing the officers’ mess of the 16th Parachute Brigade at Aldershot army barracks on February 22, 1972.1) Liam Daltun2 had initiated a series of on-going discussions involving a wide spread of Irish leftists
    [Show full text]