John F. Morrison Phd Thesis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk

brought to you by

CORE

provided by St Andrews Research Repository

'THE AFFIRMATION OF BEHAN?'

AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE POLITICISATION PROCESS OF THE
PROVISIONAL IRISH REPUBLICAN MOVEMENT THROUGH AN ORGANISATIONAL ANALYSIS OF SPLITS FROM 1969 TO 1997

John F. Morrison

A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the
University of St Andrews

2010
Full metadata for this item is available in
Research@StAndrews:FullText at:

http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10023/3158

This item is protected by original copyright

‘The Affirmation of Behan?’

An Understanding of the Politicisation Process of the Provisional Irish Republican Movement
Through an Organisational Analysis of
Splits from 1969 to 1997.

John F. Morrison
School of International Relations
Ph.D. 2010

SUBMISSION OF PHD AND MPHIL THESES REQUIRED DECLARATIONS 1. Candidate’s declarations:

I, John F. Morrison, hereby certify that this thesis, which is approximately 82,000 words in length, has been written by me, that it is the record of work carried out by me and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree.

I was admitted as a research student in September 2005 and as a candidate for the degree of Ph.D. in May, 2007; the higher study for which this is a record was carried out in the University of St Andrews between 2005 and 2010. Date 25-Aug-10 Signature of candidate

2. Supervisor’s declaration:

I hereby certify that the candidate has fulfilled the conditions of the Resolution and Regulations appropriate for the degree of Ph.D. in the University of St Andrews and that the candidate is qualified to submit this thesis in application for that degree. Date 25-Aug-10 Signature of supervisor

3. Permission for electronic publication: (to be signed by both candidate and supervisor)

In submitting this thesis to the University of St Andrews we understand that we are giving permission for it to be made available for use in accordance with the regulations of the University Library for the time being in force, subject to any copyright vested in the work not being affected thereby. We also understand that the title and the abstract will be published, and that a copy of the work may be made and supplied to any bona fide library or research worker, that my thesis will be electronically accessible for personal or research use unless exempt by award of an embargo as requested below, and that the library has the right to migrate my thesis into new electronic forms as required to ensure continued access to the thesis. We have obtained any third-party copyright permissions that may be required in order to allow such access and migration, or have requested the appropriate embargo below. The following is an agreed request by candidate and supervisor regarding the electronic publication of this thesis:

(iii) Embargo on both all of printed copy and electronic copy for the same fixed period of 1 year on the following ground(s):

Publication would be in breach of law or ethics

  • Date 25-Aug-10 Signature of candidate
  • Signature of supervisor

Table of Contents

List of Tables vii List of Figures ix
Abstract x
Acknowledgements xi
Introduction P.1

Chapter 1: Function of an Organisation

1.1 Introduction P.7
1.2 The Organisation p.8
1.3 The Terrorist Group as a Political Organisation: Public Goods and Externalities P.10
1.4 Survival and Maintenance P.14
1.5 Support P.19 1.6 Loyalty P.26
1.7 External Factors P.28
1.8 Chapter Summary P.29

Chapter 2: Intra-Organisational Conflict

2.1 Introduction P.30
2.2 Reasoning for Intra-Organisational Conflict P.31
2.3 Alternative Hypotheses p.33

2.3.2 March and Simon Model of Organisational Conflict P.33
2.3.2 The Pondy Model P.35
23.3 Weinberg and Richardson Model P.36

2.4 Intra-Organisational Conflict in Terrorist Organisations P. 38
2.5 Chapter Summary P.41

Chapter 3: Exit, Voice and Entry

3.1 Introduction P.42
3.2 Voice P.43

ii
3.3 Exit P.48
3.4 Entry P.53
3.5 Chapter Summary P.57

Chapter 4: Theory of Splits

4.1 Introduction P.58
4.2 Organisational Splits P.59
4.3 Process Model of Split P.63

4.3.1 Dyck and Starke Process Model of Breakaway Group Formation P.63

4.4 Splits in the Terrorism Literature P.67

4.4.1 Application of the Hirschman Model P.70
4.4.2 Application of the Irvin Model P.73
4.4.3 Application of the Miller Model P.74

4.5 Splits: How Terrorism Ends? P.75
4.4 Post-Split Competition P.79
4.5 Hypothesised Process Model P.83
4.6 Chapter Summary P.84

Chapter 5: Aims of the Present Study and Hypotheses

5.1 Introduction P.86
5.2 Organisational Aims and Hypotheses P.87
5.3 Individual Hypotheses and Aims P.92
5.4 The Functionality of Splits as a Process P.93
5.5 Chapter Summary P.94

Chapter 6: Methodology

6.1 Introduction to Methodology P.95
6.2 Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis P.96
6.3 Interviewing P.98

6.3.1 Sampling Procedure P.99
6.3.2 Participants P.101
6.3.3 Interview Methodology P.103

iii
5.4 Interpretative Data Analysis P.105
5.6 Validity P.106
5.7 Chapter Summary P.108

Chapter 7: Introduction to Interview Analysis: The Macro-Process of Irish
Republican Involvement in the ‘Troubles’

7.1 Introduction P.110
7.2 Splits in the Irish Republican Movement P.112
7.3 Splits as a Process P.115 7.4 Chapter Summary P.117

Chapter 8(a): 1969/70 The Origin of the Macro-Process

8a.1 Introduction P.118
8a.2 Stage 1: The Origins of 1969/70 P.120

8a.2.1 Public Support: Weakened P.121
8a.2.2 Membership: Exit, Weakening and Disillusionment P.123
8a.2.3 The Origins of Factionalism P.125

8a.3 Stage 2: Factional Development P.130

8a.3.1 Policy Changes: Too Much Too Soon? P.134
8a.3.1.1 Armed to Political P.136
8a.3.1.2 Politically Left-Wing P.138
8a.3.1.3 Abstentionism P.141
8a.3.1.4 National Leadership P.143

8a.4 Stage 3: Inevitability of and Preparation for Split P.145

8a.4.1Preparation for Split P.147
8a.4.2 Republican Expectations and Leadership Disconnect P.150
8a.4.2 External Influence: Fianna Fail P.157

8a.5 Stage 4: Organisational Exit and Breakaway Group Formation P.158

8a.5.1 The Split P.159
8a.5.2 Competition for Support P.161
8a.5.3 Personality Clashes and Trust P.164
8a.5.4 Overview of Split P.166

iv
8a.6 Stage 5 and Stage 1: Aftermath of Split: Competition and Re-Organisation P.167

8a.6.1 Competition P.169
8a.6.1.1 Competition for Membership and Support P.170
8a.6.1.2 New Enemy: Violent Feuds P.172

Chapter 8(b) 1986: The Beginning of the End

8b.1 Introduction P.176
8b.2 Stage 2: Factional Development P.178

8b.2.1 Voice: Questioning of Strategy P.183
8b.2.2 IRA Restructuring and Northern Prominence P.189

8b.3 Successful Application of Voice: Transition of Power: One Step at a Time P.192

8b.3.1 Strengthening in Alternative Support: Benefits of Circumstance P.194
8b.3.2 Control of Voice P.196
8b.3.3 Strategy Change: One Step at a Time: Armed to Armed and Political P.198
8b.3.4 Leadership Change P.203

8b.4 Stage 4: Organisational Exit and Breakaway Group Formation P.207

8b.4.1 Change in Political Strategy: Abstentionism P.211
8b.4.2 Preparation for Split P.215

8b.5 Stage 5 and Stage 1: Aftermath of Split P.219

Chapter 8(c) 1997: The Steps into Peace

8c.1 Introduction P.226
8c.2 Historical Analysis of 1997 Split P.229
8c.3 Change in Strategy: Armed and Political to Political P.238
8c.4 Factionalism P.240
8c.5 Gradualism: One Step at a Time P.244 8c.6: Preparation for Change: Support P.249

Chapter 9 Discussion and Conclusions

9.1 Introduction P.256
9.2 Present Study Findings P.257

v

9.2.1 Testing of Stage-Based Process Models P.258
9.2.1.1 1969/70 P.259
9.2.1.2 1974 P.260 9.2.1.3 1986 P.260 9.2.1.4 1997 P.261
9.2.2 Organisational Perspective P.261
9.2.3 Individual Perspective P.266

9.3 Contribution P.268
9.4 Future Research P.270
9.5 Conclusions P.272

Bibliography P.273
Appendix A Table of Interview P.287
Appendix B Complete Interview Schedule P.291 Appendix C Ethical Issues in the Research P.298
Appendix D Consent Form P.302
Appendix E The Stage-Based Data Analysis Process P.303
Appendix F 1974: The Officials Divide Again P.311 Appendix G Why Do People Become Dissidents? P.335

vi

List of Tables

Table 6.1: Participants involved at the time of the 1969/70 split P.102 Table 6.2: Participants involved at the time of the 1974 split P.102 Table 6.3: Participants involved at the time of the 1986 split P.102 Table 6.4: Participants involved at the time of the 1997 split. P.102 Table 6.5: Participants who exited the Movement at a time other than a split. P.103 Table 8a.1: Participants who discussed 1969/70 split P.119 Table 8a.2: Factionalism due to Armed Strategy P.131 Table 8a.3: Factionalism due to Political Strategy P.132 Table 8a.4: Factionalism due to Political Strategy P.132 Table 8a.5: Factionalism due to Left-Wing Political Strategy P.132 Table 8a.6: Factionalism due to Abstentionism P.133 Table 8a.7: Factionalism in National Leadership P.133 Table 8a.8: Intra-organisational conflicts between Left-Wing Politicisers and Religious Old-Guard p.134 Table 8a.9: Membership Expectations: Weapons P.152 Table 8a.10: Membership Expectations: Defence P.152 Table 8a.11: Public Expectations: Defence P.153 Table 8a.12: Disconnect between membership expectations and Leadership strategy P.153 Table 8a.13: Leadership Unprepared P.153 Table 8a.14: Influence of Fianna Fail in developing the Provisionals P.157 Table 8a.15: Significance of Personality Clashes P.165 Table 8a.16: Influential Individuals: Old-Guard P.165 Table 8a.17: Influential Individuals: Local Leadership P.166 Table 8a.18: Violent Feuds P.172 Table 8b.1: Participants who discussed 1986 split P.177 Table 8b.2: 1974/5 ceasefire beginning of 1986 process P.179 Table 8b.3: The importance of debates within the Prisons P.184 Table 8b.4: North/South Factionalism P.191 Table 8b.5: Old Guard/New Guard Factionalism P.191

vii
Table 8b.6: National Leadership Factionalism P.192 Table 8b.7: Strengthened Public Support P.196

Table 8b.8: Merger of papers P.197 Table 8b.9: Leadership Distancing P.199 Table 8b.10: Change from Armed to Armed and Political Strategy P.202 Table 8b.11: Change of Abstentionist Policy to Dail Eireann P.212 Table 8b.12: Adams/McGuinness Leadership Preparation for Change P.216 Table 8b.13: Pre-Change Securing of Support P.216 Table 8b.14: Old-Guard Influential Individuals P.218 Table 8b.15: Lessons learned P.223 Table 8c.1: Participants who discussed the 1997 split. P.228 Table 8c.2: Change in Strategy from Armed and Political to Armed P.238 Table 8c.3: Factionalism: Armed/Political P.240 Table 8c.4: Factionalism: North/South Divide P.241 Table 8c.5: Gradualism: One Step at a Time P.245 Table 8c.6: Preparation for Change P.249 Table 8c.7: The Importance of Internal Support P.250 Table 8c.8: The Importance of Timing P.250 Table 8c.9: The Application of Leadership Distancing. P.250 Table 8c.10: Usage of ‘internal methods’ in 1996 Army Convention. P.254 Table F.1: Participants who discussed the 1974 split P.312 Table F.2: Change of Armed Strategy P.314 Table F.3: Centrality of Seamus Costello to the 1974 Split P.320 Table F.4: Post Split Violent Feuds P.330

viii

List of Figures

Figure C.2: Row from the Stage 3 ‘Group’ analysis results table of ‘Denis’ P.307 Figure C.3: Extract from the super-ordinate table for the theme of Voice. P.309

ix

Abstract

One of the foremost reasons for the success of the Northern Irish Peace Process has been the ability of the national leadership of the Provisional Republican Movement to bring the majority of their membership away from the armed campaign and towards the acceptance of peaceful politics. This dissertation analyses how they were able to achieve this. This is carried out by considering the processes of the four major splits in modern day Irish republicanism from 1969 to 1997. Each split was analysed so as to derive why the split took place and why one side was more successful than the other in the aftermath. The cases were used to test a stage-based process model of split designed by the author. The data from thirty-eight semi-structured interviews were analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). This analysis treated the three Provisional splits as three micro-processes within the macro-process of Provisional Republican involvement in the ‘Troubles’, as it did the two Official splits with respect to the Official macroprocess of involvement. The results of the analysis showed that the success of the later Provisional leadership was significantly tied to their method of changing strategies, tactics and policies one step at a time rather than by attempting to implement a variety of substantial changes within a short space of time as the leadership of the 1960s endeavoured to. This research outlines how the acceptance of peaceful politics for a terrorist organisation is a gradual stage-based process and that in order to be successful that the significant changes must be implemented in a patient manner.

x

Acknowledgements

The process of this PhD has been long, and at times arduous. There was no way that I would have been able to make it through it without the help, friendship and support of so many amazing people. I would first of all like to thank Dr. John Horgan for encouraging me to move over to St. Andrews to do this PhD, and for his constant support when things weren’t running so smoothly at the beginning. Similarly I would like to give the warmest thanks to Dr. Michael Boyle for his insightful, thorough, and often times witty supervision. I have the utmost respect for any man who can calmly tackle what was initially a 150 page first chapter on organisations and split, and come out the either side laughing and joking while still pointing me in the right direction. Without either of these men I would never have been able to finish this.

I would similarly like to thank all those who were not officially affiliated with this dissertation but gave me academic guidance and support through. I would especially like to thank all the staff within the School of International Relations, St. Andrews and the librarians at the Northern Irish Political Collection in the Linen Hall Library, Belfast.

To my friends and colleagues in St. Andrews, Edinburgh, Sligo, Dublin, Belfast and all around the globe. I am very lucky to have met each and every one of you. You are now free to comfortably ask me “when are you going to be finished that ‘essay’?” without fear of a backlash. It’s done at last! I thank you all for your friendship, support, humour and interest in my work. Two people deserve a particular mention. Faye Donnelly I will never forget how you calmed me down all those years ago when I was about to drop out of this whole PhD. Thank you. Alison Careless and everyone in 5 Union St. you went out of your way to welcome me into you home in the last stressful few weeks of this work. It made it so much easier. Thank you.

Throughout my four and a bit years doing this work I have lived with a variety of amazing people. I would love to thank them all personally. However, there are three people who deserve special thanks in this regard. David Miles for making my move from

xi
Ireland to Scotland so easy and Ricky and Janette my comrades in ‘Team Channing’ my time in Belfast with you guys was one of the best years I have ever had.

To everyone who agreed to give up their time to meet or be interviewed by me I will forever be grateful. There would be no PhD without you. Similarly I am forever indebted to all those who helped arrange interviews and meetings for me. In this regard I would especially like to thank Tommie Gorman of RTE for both welcoming me to Belfast and allowing me to ‘use his name’ in my attempts to meet with numerous people. This opened so many doors for me, doors which would have stayed shut without you.

I have the most amazing family, both immediate and extended, and they have excelled themselves in support and love throughout these years. This is especially true of my three siblings Una, Kevin and Brendan. You are more than my brothers and sister, you are my best friends. Also to Grandma, Ita Stephens, you have always shown nothing but love and support to me in this and all of my endeavours down through the years. Gra Mor. However, above all others who have been mentioned in these acknowledgements I don’t know how to thank my amazing parents Barbara and Peter Morrison enough. You have gone beyond the call of parenting in your support of me throughout these years. I love you both so much, and will never forget what you have done for me.

I would finally like to acknowledge the pain and suffering which so many people in Northern Ireland, Great Britain and the Republic of Ireland have endured throughout the years, be it at the hands of paramilitaries, security forces or governments. Nothing is worth the death, injury and permanent trauma which has been endured. It is up to us all to make sure that we never return to those days.

John F. Morrison June 10th, 2010 University of St. Andrews, Scotland.

xii

Introduction

The Northern Irish peace process is internationally recognised as having brought an end to the conflict commonly referred to as ‘The Troubles.’1 The involvement of the British and Irish governments as well as their American allies is rightly credited as playing a major role in achieving a lasting peace. However, without the positive actions and compromises of the Northern Irish actors, both those violent and peaceful actors, the achievement of peace would have been impossible. Central to this was the movement of the Irish Republican Movement, in particular the Provisional Irish Republican Army (PIRA), from the employment of terrorism2 as a tactic towards the exclusive adoption of peaceful politics. 3 Without this action and their continued commitment to peaceful politics any progress in the peaceful development of the six counties of Northern Ireland would have been extremely difficult.4

The continued success of the peace process is reliant on the commitment of the leaders of the various Northern Irish organisations, both violent and non-violent, to the utilisation

1 While this is the case there have been significant failures of the process and consequently there are those who are highly critical of the process. See Dingley, J. (2002). Peace in Our Time? The Stresses and Strains on the Northern Ireland Peace Process. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 25(6), pp.357-382 2For the purpose of this work there will not be an extensive discussion outlining the ins and outs of the debate. For the purpose of this dissertation any use of the word ‘terrorism’ refers to the employment of violence or the threat of repeated violence by the individual or group intent on bringing about a social or political effect. The aim of this action is to bring about a state of fear in a wider audience than the direct physical victims of the initial act or threat of violence. A terrorist incident should be defined by the use of violence or the threat of violence to bring about social or political change, not by the specific motive of the perpetrators. Therefore terrorism is a tactic which can be employed by any individual or group, whether they be state or non-state actors. See for example, Schmid, A. & Jongman (2005). Political Terrorism: A

New Guide to Actors, Authors, Concepts, Data Bases, Theories and Literature. (New Brunswick, NJ:

Transaction), pp.1-38; Richardson, L. (2007). What Terrorists Want.  (London: John Murray), pp.19-39; Horgan, J. (2005). The Psychology of Terrorism.  (London: Routledge), pp. 1-47; Hoffman, B. (2006). Inside Terrorism. (New York: Columbia University Press), pp. 1-41; Weinberg, L., Pedahzur, A. & HirschHoefler, S. (2004). The Challenges of Conceptualising Terrorism, Terrorism and Political Violence, 16(4), pp. 777-794; Silke, A. (1996). Terrorism and the Blind Man’s Elephant, Terrorism and Political Violence, 8(3), pp. 12-28; English, R. (2009). Terrorism How to Respond.  (New York: Oxford University Press). Pp.1-26. 3 This belief that the Republican change in strategy was a dominant factor in the success of the peace process is supportive of the position taken in Hayes, M. (1998). The Evolution of Republican Strategy and the ‘Peace Process’ in Ireland. In Race & Class, 39(3), pp.21-39 4 The same is true for those other Republican groups as well as the Loyalist paramilitaries who renounced violence.

1and promotion of peaceful politics.5 However, what is more important is that the majority of their organisational membership similarly ascribe to the power of politics as opposed to the employment of the gun and the bomb. A leadership promoting peaceful politics is only constructive if they convince their internal membership and support of its benefits. It has been the ability of the leadership of the modern day Provisional IRA and Sinn Fein to successfully convince the majority of its membership of the benefits of peaceful politics which has ensured their continued involvement in the continuing peace process.

Recommended publications
  • The Counter-Aesthetics of Republican Prison Writing

    The Counter-Aesthetics of Republican Prison Writing

    Notes Chapter One Introduction: Taoibh Amuigh agus Faoi Ghlas: The Counter-aesthetics of Republican Prison Writing 1. Gerry Adams, “The Fire,” Cage Eleven (Dingle: Brandon, 1990) 37. 2. Ibid., 46. 3. Pat Magee, Gangsters or Guerillas? (Belfast: Beyond the Pale, 2001) v. 4. David Pierce, ed., Introduction, Irish Writing in the Twentieth Century: A Reader (Cork: Cork University Press, 2000) xl. 5. Ibid. 6. Shiela Roberts, “South African Prison Literature,” Ariel 16.2 (Apr. 1985): 61. 7. Michel Foucault, “Power and Strategies,” Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977, ed. Colin Gordon (New York: Pantheon, 1980) 141–2. 8. In “The Eye of Power,” for instance, Foucault argues, “The tendency of Bentham’s thought [in designing prisons such as the famed Panopticon] is archaic in the importance it gives to the gaze.” In Power/ Knowledge 160. 9. Breyten Breytenbach, The True Confessions of an Albino Terrorist (New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 1983) 147. 10. Ioan Davies, Writers in Prison (Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1990) 4. 11. Ibid. 12. William Wordsworth, “Preface to Lyrical Ballads,” The Norton Anthology of English Literature vol. 2A, 7th edition, ed. M. H. Abrams et al. (New York: W. W. Norton, 2000) 250. 13. Gerry Adams, “Inside Story,” Republican News 16 Aug. 1975: 6. 14. Gerry Adams, “Cage Eleven,” Cage Eleven (Dingle: Brandon, 1990) 20. 15. Wordsworth, “Preface” 249. 16. Ibid., 250. 17. Ibid. 18. Terry Eagleton, The Ideology of the Aesthetic (Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1990) 27. 19. W. B. Yeats, Essays and Introductions (New York: Macmillan, 1961) 521–2. 20. Bobby Sands, One Day in My Life (Dublin and Cork: Mercier, 1983) 98.
  • Mary Macswiney Was First Publicly Associated

    Mary Macswiney Was First Publicly Associated

    MacSwiney, Mary by Brian Murphy MacSwiney, Mary (1872–1942), republican, was born 27 March 1872 at Bermondsey, London, eldest of seven surviving children of an English mother and an Irish émigré father, and grew up in London until she was seven. Her father, John MacSwiney, was born c.1835 on a farm at Kilmurray, near Crookstown, Co. Cork, while her mother Mary Wilkinson was English and otherwise remains obscure; they married in a catholic church in Southwark in 1871. After the family moved to Cork city (1879), her father started a snuff and tobacco business, and in the same year Mary's brother Terence MacSwiney (qv) was born. After his business failed, her father emigrated alone to Australia in 1885, and died at Melbourne in 1895. Nonetheless, before he emigrated he inculcated in all his children his own fervent separatism, which proved to be a formidable legacy. Mary was beset by ill health in childhood, her misfortune culminating with the amputation of an infected foot. As a result, it was at the late age of 20 that she finished her education at St Angela's Ursuline convent school in 1892. By 1900 she was teaching in English convent schools at Hillside, Farnborough, and at Ventnor, Isle of Wight. Her mother's death in 1904 led to her return to Cork to head the household, and she secured a teaching post back at St Angela's. In 1912 her education was completed with a BA from UCC. The MacSwiney household of this era was an intensely separatist household. Avidly reading the newspapers of Arthur Griffith (qv), they nevertheless rejected Griffith's dual monarchy policy.
  • Irish History Links

    Irish History Links

    Irish History topics pulled together by Dan Callaghan NC AOH Historian in 2014 Athenry Castle; http://www.irelandseye.com/aarticles/travel/attractions/castles/Galway/athenry.shtm Brehon Laws of Ireland; http://www.libraryireland.com/Brehon-Laws/Contents.php February 1, in ancient Celtic times, it was the beginning of Spring and later became the feast day for St. Bridget; http://www.chalicecentre.net/imbolc.htm May 1, Begins the Celtic celebration of Beltane, May Day; http://wicca.com/celtic/akasha/beltane.htm. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ February 14, 269, St. Valentine, buried in Dublin; http://homepage.eircom.net/~seanjmurphy/irhismys/valentine.htm March 17, 461, St. Patrick dies, many different reports as to the actual date exist; http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/11554a.htm Dec. 7, 521, St. Columcille is born, http://prayerfoundation.org/favoritemonks/favorite_monks_columcille_columba.htm January 23, 540 A.D., St. Ciarán, started Clonmacnoise Monastery; http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/04065a.htm May 16, 578, Feast Day of St. Brendan; http://parish.saintbrendan.org/church/story.php June 9th, 597, St. Columcille, dies at Iona; http://www.irishcultureandcustoms.com/ASaints/Columcille.html Nov. 23, 615, Irish born St. Columbanus dies, www.newadvent.org/cathen/04137a.htm July 8, 689, St. Killian is put to death; http://allsaintsbrookline.org/celtic_saints/killian.html October 13, 1012, Irish Monk and Bishop St. Colman dies; http://www.stcolman.com/ Nov. 14, 1180, first Irish born Bishop of Dublin, St. Laurence O'Toole, dies, www.newadvent.org/cathen/09091b.htm June 7, 1584, Arch Bishop Dermot O'Hurley is hung by the British for being Catholic; http://www.exclassics.com/foxe/dermot.htm 1600 Sept.
  • These Are the Future Leaders of Ulster If the St Andrews Agreement Is Endorsed

    These Are the Future Leaders of Ulster If the St Andrews Agreement Is Endorsed

    The Burning Bush—Online article archive These are the future leaders of Ulster if the St Andrews Agreement is endorsed “The Burning Bush” has only two more issues to go after this current edition, before its witness concludes. It has sought to warn its readers of the wickedness and com- promise taking place within “church and state”, since its first edition back in March 1970. The issues facing Christians were comparatively plain and simple back then, or so it seems now on reflection. Today, however, the confusion that we sought to combat McGuinness (far right) in IRA uniform at the funeral of fellow within the ranks of the ecumenical churches and organi- IRA man and close friend Colm sations, seems to have spread to the ranks of those who, Keenan in 1972 over the years, have been engaged in opposing the reli- gious and political sell-out. The reaction to the St Andrews Agreement has shown that to be so. It is an agreement, when stripped of all its legal jargon and political frills, that will place an unrepentant murderer in co-leadership of Northern Ireland. How unthinkable such a notion was back in 1970! Today we are told, it is both thinkable and exceeding wise! In an effort to refocus the minds and hearts of Christians we publish some well- established facts about those whom the St Andrews Agreement would have us choose and submit to and make masters of our destiny and that of our children. By the blessing of God, may a consideration of these facts awaken the slumbering soul of Ulster Protestantism.
  • New Media, Free Expression, and the Offences Against the State Acts

    New Media, Free Expression, and the Offences Against the State Acts

    Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2020 New Media, Free Expression, and the Offences Against the State Acts Laura K. Donohue Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/2248 https://ssrn.com/abstract=3825722 Laura K. Donohue, New Media, Free Expression, and the Offences Against the State Acts, in The Offences Against the State Act 1939 at 80: A Model Counter-Terrorism Act? 163 (Mark Coen ed., Oxford: Hart Publishing 2021). This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, European Law Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, International Law Commons, Internet Law Commons, Legislation Commons, and the National Security Law Commons New Media, Free Expression, and the Offences Against the State Acts Laura K. Donohue1 Introduction Social media has become an integral part of modern human interaction: as of October 2019, Facebook reported 2.414 billion active users worldwide.2 YouTube, WhatsApp, and Instagram were not far behind, with 2 billion, 1.6 billion, and 1 billion users respectively.3 In Ireland, 3.2 million people (66% of the population) use social media for an average of nearly two hours per day.4 By 2022, the number of domestic Facebook users is expected to reach 2.92 million.5 Forty-one percent of the population uses Instagram (65% daily); 30% uses Twitter (40% daily), and another 30% uses LinkedIn.6 With social media most prevalent amongst the younger generations, these numbers will only rise.
  • Ireland and the Basque Country: Nationalisms in Contact, 1895-1939

    Ireland and the Basque Country: Nationalisms in Contact, 1895-1939

    Ireland and the Basque Country: Nationalisms in Contact, 1895-1939 Kyle McCreanor A Thesis in the Department of History Presented in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts (History) at Concordia University Montréal, Québec, Canada March 2019 © Kyle McCreanor, 2019 CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY School of Graduate Studies This is to certify that the thesis prepared By: Kyle McCreanor Entitled: Ireland and the Basque Country: Nationalisms in Contact, 1895-1939 and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts (History) complies with the regulations of the University and meets the accepted standards with respect to originality and quality. Signed by the final Examining Committee: _________________________________ Chair Dr. Andrew Ivaska _________________________________ Examiner Dr. Ted McCormick _________________________________ Examiner Dr. Cameron Watson _________________________________ Supervisor Dr. Gavin Foster Approved by _________________________________________________________ Chair of Department or Graduate Program Director _______________ 2019 _________________________________________ Dean of Faculty iii Abstract Ireland and the Basque Country: Nationalisms in Contact, 1895-1939 Kyle McCreanor This thesis examines the relationships between Irish and Basque nationalists and nationalisms from 1895 to 1939—a period of rapid, drastic change in both contexts. In the Basque Country, 1895 marked the birth of the Partido Nacionalista Vasco (Basque Nationalist Party), concurrent with the development of the cultural nationalist movement known as the ‘Gaelic revival’ in pre-revolutionary Ireland. In 1939, the Spanish Civil War ended with the destruction of the Spanish Second Republic, plunging Basque nationalism into decades of intense persecution. Conversely, at this same time, Irish nationalist aspirations were realized to an unprecedented degree during the ‘republicanization’ of the Irish Free State under Irish leader Éamon de Valera.
  • A Comparative Study of Extremism Within Nationalist Movements

    A Comparative Study of Extremism Within Nationalist Movements

    A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EXTREMISM WITHIN NATIONALIST MOVEMENTS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM AND SPAIN by Ashton Croft Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Departmental Honors in the Department of History Texas Christian University Fort Worth, Texas 22 April 2019 Croft 1 A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EXTREMISM WITHIN NATIONALIST MOVEMENTS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM AND SPAIN Project Approved: Supervising Professor: William Meier, Ph.D. Department of History Jodi Campbell, Ph.D. Department of History Eric Cox, Ph.D. Department of Political Science Croft 2 ABSTRACT Nationalism in nations without statehood is common throughout history, although what nationalism leads to differs. In the cases of the United Kingdom and Spain, these effects ranged in various forms from extremism to cultural movements. In this paper, I will examine the effects of extremists within the nationalism movement and their overall effects on societies and the imagined communities within the respective states. I will also compare the actions of extremist factions, such as the Irish Republican Army (IRA), the Basque Euskadi Ta Askatasuna (ETA), and the Scottish National Liberation Army (SNLA), and examine what strategies worked for the various nationalist movements at what points, as well as how the movements connected their motives and actions to historical memory. Many of the groups appealed to a wider “imagined community” based on constructing a shared history of nationhood. For example, violence was most effective when it directly targeted oppressors, but it did not work when civilians were harmed. Additionally, organizations that tied rhetoric and acts back to actual histories of oppression or of autonomy tended to garner more widespread support than others.
  • The Hungerstrikes

    The Hungerstrikes

    anIssue 5 Jul-Sept 2019 £2.50/€3.00 spréachIndependent non-profit Socialist Republican magazine THE HUNGERSTRIKES PIVOTAL MOMENTS IN OUR HISTORY Where’s the Pleasure? Examining Sexual Morality Under Capitalism An EU Immigrant The Craigavon 2 More Than A I’m Irish and Pro- A Miscarriage of Beautiful Game Leave Justice Soccer and Politics DIGITAL BACK ISSUES of anspréach Magazine are available for download via our website. Just visit www.anspreach.org ____ Dear reader, An Spréach is an independent Socialist Republican magazine formed by a collective of political activists across Ireland. It aims to bring you, the read- er, a broad swathe of opinion from within the Irish Socialist Republican political sphere, including, but not exclusive to, the fight for national liberation and socialism in Ireland and internationally. The views expressed herein, do not necesserily represent the publication and are purely those of the author. We welcome contributions from all political activists, including opinion pieces, letters, historical analyses and other relevant material. The editor reserves the right to exclude or omit any articles that may be deemed defamatory or abusive. Full and real names must be provided, even in instances where a pseudonym is used, including contact details. Please bear in mind that you may be asked to shorten material if necessary, and where we may be required to edit a piece to fit within these pages, all efforts will be made to retain its balance and opinion, without bias. An Spréach is a not-for-profit magazine which only aims to fund its running costs, including print and associated platforms.
  • The Irish Diaspora in Britain & America

    The Irish Diaspora in Britain & America

    Reflections on 1969 Lived Experiences & Living history (Discussion 6) The Irish Diaspora in Britain & America: Benign or Malign Forces? compiled by Michael Hall ISLAND 123 PAMPHLETS 1 Published January 2020 by Island Publications 132 Serpentine Road, Newtownabbey BT36 7JQ © Michael Hall 2020 [email protected] http://cain.ulst.ac.uk/islandpublications The Fellowship of Messines Association gratefully acknowledge the assistance they have received from their supporting organisations Printed by Regency Press, Belfast 2 Introduction The Fellowship of Messines Association was formed in May 2002 by a diverse group of individuals from Loyalist, Republican and other backgrounds, united in their realisation of the need to confront sectarianism in our society as a necessary means of realistic peace-building. The project also engages young people and new citizens on themes of citizenship and cultural and political identity. Among the different programmes initiated by the Messines Project was a series of discussions entitled Reflections on 1969: Lived Experiences & Living History. These discussions were viewed as an opportunity for people to engage positively and constructively with each other in assisting the long overdue and necessary process of separating actual history from some of the myths that have proliferated in communities over the years. It was felt important that current and future generations should hear, and have access to, the testimonies and the reflections of former protagonists while these opportunities still exist. Access to such evidence would hopefully enable younger generations to evaluate for themselves the factuality of events, as opposed to some of the folklore that passes for history in contemporary society.
  • Socialist Fight No.10

    Socialist Fight No.10

    Socialist Fight Issue No. 10 Autumn 2012 Price: Concessions: 50p, Waged: £2.00 €3 Editorial: “Basic national loyalty and patriotism” and the US proxy war in Syria Ali Zein Al-Abidin Al-barri, summarily murdered with 14 of his men by the FSA for defending Aleppo against pro- imperialist reaction funded by Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar in another US-sponsored counter-revolution in the region Page 10-11: The Counihan-Sanchez family; Page 24: What really is imperialism? Contents a story of Cameron’s Britain. By Farooq Sulehria. Page 2: Editorial: “Basic national loyalty Page 12: FREE The MOVE 9; Ona MOVE for Page 26: Thirty Years in a Turtle-Neck and patriotism” and the US proxy war. our Children! By Cinead D and Patrick Sweater, Review by Laurence Humphries. Page 4: Rank and file conference Conway Murphy. Page 27: Revolutionary communist at Hall 11th August, By Laurence Humphries. Page 13: Letters page, The French Elec- work: a political biography of Bert Ramel- Page 4: London bus drivers Olympics’ bo- tions. son, Review by Laurence Humphries. nus: Well done the drivers! - London GRL, Page 14: Response to Jim Creggan's By Ray Page 29: Queensland: Will the Unions Step On Diversions and ‘Total Victory’ By a Rising. Up? By Aggie McCallum – Australia London bus driver. Page 17: The imperialist degeneration of Page 30: LETTER FROM TPR TO LC AND Page 6: Questions from the IRPSG . sport, By Yuri Iskhandar and Humberto REPLY. Christian Armenteros and Hum- Page 7: REPORT OF THE MEETING AT THE Rodrigues. berto Rodrigues. IRISH EMBASSY 31st JULY 2012 Page 20: A materialist world-view, Face- Page 31: Cosatu – Tied to the Alliance and Page 8: Irish Left ignores plight of Irish book debate.
  • LIST of POSTERS Page 1 of 30

    LIST of POSTERS Page 1 of 30

    LIST OF POSTERS Page 1 of 30 A hot August night’ feauturing Brush Shiels ‘Oh no, not Drumcree again!’ ‘Sinn Féin women demand their place at Irish peace talks’ ‘We will not be kept down easy, we will not be still’ ‘Why won’t you let my daddy come home?’ 100 years of Trade Unionism - what gains for the working class? 100th anniversary of Eleanor Marx in Derry 11th annual hunger strike commemoration 15 festival de cinema 15th anniversary of hunger strike 15th anniversary of the great Long Kesh escape 1690. Educate not celebrate 1969 - Nationalist rights did not exist 1969, RUC help Orange mob rule 1970s Falls Curfew, March and Rally 1980 Hunger Strike anniversary talk 1980 Hunger-Strikers, 1990 political hostages 1981 - 1991, H-block martyrs 1981 H-block hunger-strike 1981 hunger strikes, 1991 political hostages 1995 Green Ink Irish Book Fair 1996 - the Nationalist nightmare continues 20 years of death squads. Disband the murderers 200,000 votes for Sinn Féin is a mandate 21st annual volunteer Tom Smith commemoration 22 years in English jails 25 years - time to go! Ireland - a bright new dawn of hope and peace 25 years too long 25th anniversary of internment dividedsociety.org LIST OF POSTERS Page 2 of 30 25th anniversary of the introduction of British troops 27th anniversary of internment march and rally 5 reasons to ban plastic bullets 5 years for possessing a poster 50th anniversary - Vol. Tom Williams 6 Chontae 6 Counties = Orange state 75th anniversary of Easter Rising 75th anniversary of the first Dáil Éireann A guide to Irish history
  • Accounting and Discounting for the International Contacts of the Provisional Irish Republican Army by Michael Mckinley

    Accounting and Discounting for the International Contacts of the Provisional Irish Republican Army by Michael Mckinley

    Conflict Quarterly Of "Alien Influences": Accounting and Discounting for the International Contacts of the Provisional Irish Republican Army by Michael McKinley NATURE OF INTERNATIONAL CONTACTS In a world where nation states are unanimous in their disavowal of terrorism — even if they are incapable of unanimously agreeing on a defini­ tion of what it is they are disavowing — and in a Western Europe which regards separatist and irredentist claims as anathema, mere is a natural ten­ dency for those who are so excluded to make common cause where they might Disparate as these groups are, they really have only themselves to meet as equals; though they might wish to be nation states or represent nation states in the fullness of time, they exist until then as interlopers in the relations between states: seldom invited and then almost always disappointed by their reception. It is a world with which the Provisional Irish Republican Army and its more political expression, Sinn Fein, are entirely familiar and also one in which, given their history, political complexion, strategy and objectives, it would be extraordinarily strange for them not to have a wide range of inter­ national contacts. But potent as the reflex of commonality by exclusion is, it does not completely determine these linkages because to argue this is to argue on the basis of default rather than purpose. For the Provisionals there is a utility not only of making such contacts but also in formalizing them where possible within the movements' organizational structure. Thus, in 1976 the Sinn Fein Ard Fheis moved to establish, under the directorship of Risteard Behal, a Foreign Affairs Bureau, with Behal as its first "sort of roving Euro­ pean ambassador .