Perspective Tourism Development on the European Coast Russia
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Assessment of Renewable Energy Potentials Based on GIS. a Case Study in Southwest Region of Russia
Assessment of renewable energy potentials based on GIS. A case study in southwest region of Russia. by Alisa Melnikova (M. Sc., M. Sc.) from Bendery, Moldova Accepted Dissertation thesis for the partial fulfilment of the requirements for a Doctor of Political Sciences (Dr. rer. pol.) Fachbereich 7: Natur- und Umweltwissenschaften University Koblenz-Landau Thesis examiners: Prof. Dr. Oliver Frör, Universität Koblenz-Landau, 1st examiner Dr. Stefan Jergentz, Universität Koblenz-Landau, 2nd examiner Date of the oral examination: 28.03.2018 Declaration I hereby declare that I autonomously conducted the work presented in this PhD thesis entitled “Assessment of renewable energy potentials based on GIS. A case study in south- west region of Russia”. All used assistances and involved contributors are clearly de- clared. This thesis has never been submitted elsewhere for an exam, as a thesis or for evaluation in a similar context to any department of this University or any scientific in- stitution. I am aware that a violation of the aforementioned conditions can have legal consequences. Landau in der Pfalz, 10.04.2018 Place, date Signature Acknowledgements Foremost, I would like to gratefully acknowledge my supervisor Prof. Dr. Oliver Frör for providing me a chance to pursue a doctoral degree at the University of Koblenz-Landau. He has given me valuable comments on my study and supervised this PhD thesis. I am sincerely grateful for his patience, motivation and immense knowledge. Furthermore, I am also very thankful to Dr. Stefan Jergentz for his support and valuable suggestions on my final thesis and being second examiner. I gratefully acknowledge the scholarships, which gave me the financial support for 3 years of my PhD thesis, the DAAD (Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst) for the first scholarship from October 2014 to July 2015 and an additional scholarship from August 2017 to October 2017 as well as Lotto Rheinland-Pfalz – Stiftung Sozial-Stipendien for providing a 2-years scholarship from July 2015 to July 2017. -
Geodiagnostics of Lithogydrogenic Systems for Forecasting Exoggeodynamic Processes
MATEC Web of Conferences 265, 03008 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201926503008 GCCETS 2018 Geodiagnostics of lithogydrogenic systems for forecasting exoggeodynamic processes Anatoliy Yamashkin1, Stanislav Yamashkin1,*, Vladimir Erofeev1, and Anna Piksaykina1 1National Research Mordovia State University, Saransk, Republic of Mordovia, 430005, Russia Abstract. The landscape indication, based on the automated analysis of remote sensing data, is one of the key methods of research and mapping of lithohydrogene geosystems. The article describes a set of methods for effective detection of types of lithohydrogene systems, including a set of modules for identifying dynamic and invariant descriptors of the territory; assessment of geophysical diversity of landscapes; analysis of the geophysical shell through the calculation of the descriptors of the neighborhood; ensemble-analysis of remote sensing data for monitoring the state of geosystems and forecasting of natural processes. The system of methods for detecting types of landscapes made it possible to conduct geodiagnostics of lithohydrogene systems of the Privolzhskaya Upland and the marginal part of the Oka-Don lowland reservoir within the boundaries of the Republic of Mordovia in order to predict the development of exogeodynamic processes. 1 Introduction The most important directions of modern research in the Earth sciences are the development of a methodology and methods for searching for patterns of development of exogeodynamic processes (EGP) for forecasting development and minimizing -
Russian Oil and Gas Challenges
Order Code RL33212 Russian Oil and Gas Challenges Updated June 20, 2007 Robert Pirog Specialist in Energy Economics and Policy Resources, Science, and Industry Division Russian Oil and Gas Challenges Summary Russia is a major player in world energy markets. It has more proven natural gas reserves than any other country, is among the top ten in proven oil reserves, is the largest exporter of natural gas, the second largest oil exporter, and the third largest energy consumer. Energy exports have been a major driver of Russia’s economic growth over the last five years, as Russian oil production has risen strongly and world oil prices have been very high. This type of growth has made the Russian economy dependent on oil and natural gas exports and vulnerable to fluctuations in oil prices. The Russian government has moved to take control of the country’s energy supplies. It broke up the previously large energy company Yukos and acquired its main oil production subsidiary. The Duma voted to give Gazprom, the state- controlled natural gas monopoly the exclusive right to export natural gas; Russia moved to limit participation by foreign companies in oil and gas production and Gazprom gained majority control of the Sakhalin energy projects. Russia has agreed with Germany to supply Germany and, eventually, the UK by building a natural gas pipeline under the Baltic Sea, bypassing Ukraine and Poland. In late 2006 and early 2007, Russia cut off and/or threatened to cut off gas or oil supplies going to and/or through Ukraine, Moldova, Georgia, and Belarus in the context of price and/or transit negotiations — actions that damaged its reputation as a reliable energy supplier. -
Investment in Production Development: Leading Industries
Yaroslavl region INVESTMENT IN PRODUCTION DEVELOPMENT: LEADING INDUSTRIES CONTENTS The Yaroslavl region 01 The Yaroslavl region: general information 5 02 The Yaroslavl region: economic potential 7 The Yaroslavl region: leading industries 8 03 Leading industries: prospective sectors for localization 04 and technology partnership in the region 11 Ship building and marine equipment 12 Power engineering, electrical and cable industries 16 Engine building 20 Chemical engineering complex 22 CLUSTERS Production of road building and municipal machinery 26 Personnel training and education 30 05 Investment in production development 35 06 Prepared investment projects 35 Investor supporting measures 40 The government of the Yaroslavl region provides facilities for development of real economy industry sectors and for implementation of investment projects focusing on improving industrial competitiveness and export potential. Strengthening cooperation with large state corporations ensures intensive development of high-tech manufacture, innovative ventures and region’s economic development. In recent years the Yaroslavl region has demonstrated a steady industrial production growth; in the first quarter of 2019 industrial production index was almost 123% (102% for Russia). Pharmaceutical cluster enterprises that constantly expand participating companies significantly contribute to the industrial development. Large projects are being implemented in the Yaroslavl region by Takeda Pharmaceuticals, R-Farm, NT Pharma, Vita Pharma and Teva companies. Drug quality test laboratory of the Federal Service for Surveillance in Healthcare is to be put in operation in 2019. Last year production of the Ninlaro innovative drug began, promoting Russian pharmaceutical industry to a fundamentally new development level. Previously such drugs were released into civil circulation only in five countries (Japan, France, USA, Germany, and Austria). -
Information About the Authors
Ярославский педагогический вестник – 2015 – № 6 INFORMATION ABOUT THE AUTHORS Abaturova Vera Sergeevna – Candidate of Peda- Belkina Tamara Leonidovna – Candidate of gogical Sciences, Head of the Educational and In- Philosophic Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor formation Technologies Department of the Southern of the Philosophy and Political Science Department Mathematical Institute of Vladikavkaz Scientific of FSBEI HPE «Kostroma State University named Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, the Re- after N. A. Nekrasov». 156961, Kostroma, 1-st May public of Noth Ossetia – Alania. 362027, Vladikav- Street, 14. kaz, Markus Street, 22. E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Belova Irina Sergeevna – Candidate of Philo- Azov Andrey Vadimovich – Doctor of Philosoph- sophic Sciences, Professor of the General Humani- ic Sciences, Professor, Head of the Philosophy De- ties and Study of Theatre Department of FSBEI HPE partment of FSBEI HPE «Yaroslavl State Pedagogi- «Yaroslavl State Theatrical Institute». 150000, Ya- cal University named after K. D. Ushinsky». roslavl, Pervomayskaya Street, 43. 150000, Yaroslavl, Respublikanskaya Street, 108. E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Budakhina Nadezhda Leonidovna – Candidate Bazikov Mikhail Vasilievich – an applicant of of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor of the the General and Social Psychology Department of Economics and Management Department of FSBEI FSBEI HPE «Yaroslavl State Pedagogical Universi- HPE «Yaroslavl State Pedagogical University -
Obtaining World Heritage Status and the Impacts of Listing Aa, Bart J.M
University of Groningen Preserving the heritage of humanity? Obtaining world heritage status and the impacts of listing Aa, Bart J.M. van der IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2005 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Aa, B. J. M. V. D. (2005). Preserving the heritage of humanity? Obtaining world heritage status and the impacts of listing. s.n. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 23-09-2021 Appendix 4 World heritage site nominations Listed site in May 2004 (year of rejection, year of listing, possible year of extension of the site) Rejected site and not listed until May 2004 (first year of rejection) Afghanistan Península Valdés (1999) Jam, -
Confirmed Soc Reports List 2015-2016
Confirmed State of Conservation Reports for natural and mixed World Heritage sites 2015 - 2016 Nr Region Country Site Natural or Additional information mixed site 1 LAC Argentina Iguazu National Park Natural 2 APA Australia Tasmanian Wilderness Mixed 3 EURNA Belarus / Poland Bialowieza Forest Natural 4 LAC Belize Belize Barrier Reef Reserve System Natural World Heritage in Danger 5 AFR Botswana Okavango Delta Natural 6 LAC Brazil Iguaçu National Park Natural 7 LAC Brazil Cerrado Protected Areas: Chapada dos Veadeiros and Natural Emas National Parks 8 EURNA Bulgaria Pirin National Park Natural 9 AFR Cameroon Dja Faunal Reserve Natural 10 EURNA Canada Gros Morne National Park Natural 11 AFR Central African Republic Manovo-Gounda St Floris National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 12 LAC Costa Rica / Panama Talamanca Range-La Amistad Reserves / La Amistad Natural National Park 13 AFR Côte d'Ivoire Comoé National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 14 AFR Côte d'Ivoire / Guinea Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve Natural World Heritage in Danger 15 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Garamba National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 16 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Kahuzi-Biega National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 17 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Okapi Wildlife Reserve Natural World Heritage in Danger 18 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Salonga National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 19 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Virunga National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 20 AFR Democratic -
New Records of Lichens and Allied Fungi from the Kostroma Region, Russia
Folia Cryptog. Estonica, Fasc. 56: 53–62 (2019) https://doi.org/10.12697/fce.2019.56.06 New records of lichens and allied fungi from the Kostroma Region, Russia Irina Urbanavichene1 & Gennadii Urbanavichus2 1Komarov Botanical Institute RAS, Professor Popov Str. 2, 197376 St Petersburg, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] 2Institute of North Industrial Ecology Problems, Kola Science Centre RAS, Akademgorodok 14a, 184209 Apatity, Murmansk Region, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: 29 species of lichens, 3 non-lichenized calicioid fungi and 3 lichenicolous fungi are reported for the first time from the Kostroma Region. Among them, 15 species are new for the Central Federal District, including Myrionora albidula – a rare species with widely scattered locations, previously known only from the Southern Urals Mts in European Russia. The most important discoveries are confined to old-growth coniferous Picea sp. and Abies sibirica forests in the Kologriv Forest Nature Reserve. Two species (Leptogium burnetiae and Menegazzia terebrata) are included in the Red Data Book of Russian Federation. The distribution, ecology, taxonomic characters and conservation status of rare species and of those new for the Central Federal District are provided. Keywords: Biatora mendax, Myrionora albidula, old-growth forests, southern taiga, Kologriv Forest Reserve, Central European Russia INTRODUCTION The Kostroma Region is a large (60,211 km2), berniya, listing 39 and 54 taxa, respectively. most northeastern part of the Central Federal The recent published additions to the Kostroma District in European Russia situated between lichen flora are from the Kologriv District by Ivanovo, Yaroslavl, Vologda, Kirov and Nizhniy Novgorod regions (Fig. -
Current Tourism Trends on the Black Sea Coast
CURRENT TOURISM TRENDS ON THE BLACK SEA COAST Minenkova Vera, Kuban State University, Russia Tatiana Volkova, Kuban State University, Russia Anatoly Filobok, Kuban State University, Russia Anna Mamonova, Kuban State University, Russia Sharmatava Asida, Kuban State University, Russia [email protected] The article deals with current trends of development of tourism on the Black Sea coast, related to geographical, economic, geopolitical factors. Key words: Black Sea coast, tourism and recreation complex, tourism, current trends. I. INTRODUCTION Black Sea coast has a number of natural features that define the high tourism and recreation potential of the territory. The unique combination of different resources defines the high tourism and recreation potential of the territory and creates conditions for the development of various forms of tourist activity. In view of the existing tourism industry (accommodation facilities, entertainment companies, etc.) and infrastructure we can talk about conditions for the development of almost all types of tourism: − cultural, educational and historical − health and resort − children − ecological − business − ethnographic − religious − agritourism (rural) − gastronomic and wine − active forms of tourism (diving, kitesurfing, hang-gliding, biking, caving, jeeping, rafting, horse riding, skiing and snowboarding, mountain climbing). II. TOURISM DEVELOPMENT FACTORS In general, current trends in the development of tourism on the Black Sea coast are determined by several factors: 1. The presence of significant historical and cultural potential and the unique culture of the local communities. According to archaeological evidence, the Caucasus is really to be considered one of the main points related to the "Cradle places of human civilization" (a series of sites of ancient human settlements in the Caucasus extends back over 300-350 thousand years). -
Vol 67-Uus.Indd
Forestry Studies | Metsanduslikud Uurimused, Vol. 67, Pages 109–115 Population density of the Eurasian beaver (Castor fi ber L.) (Castoridae, Rodentia) in the Middle Volga of Russia Alexey Andreychev Andreychev, A. 2017. Population density of the Eurasian beaver (Castor fi ber L.) (Cas- toridae, Rodentia) in the Middle Volga of Russia. – Forestry Studies | Metsandusli- kud Uurimused 67, 109–115. ISSN 1406-9954. Journal homepage: http://mi.emu.ee/ forestry.studies Abstract. The article presents research on the population density of the Eurasian beaver in the large, medium and small rivers of the Republic of Mordovia. The population density of the beaver in the large rivers of the region varies from 0.45 to 0.62 colonies per km (average 0.52). The population density in medium rivers ranges from 0.36 to 0.48 colonies per km (average 0.4). In small rivers, population density ranges from 0.2 to 0.94 colonies per km (average 0.46). The total number of beavers in the region is about 17,000 individuals as at 2016. Key words: Eurasian beaver, Castor fi ber, density population, colonies, European Russia, Mordovia. Author’s address: Department of Zoology, Mordovian State University, Bolshevist- skaya str. 68, 430005, Saransk, Republic of Mordovia, Russia; e-mail: andreychev1@ rambler.ru on re-acclimatisation. In total, 34 beavers Introduction were released. The Eurasian beaver was imported from the Voronezh Game Re- Currently, the populations of the Eurasian serve. The release into the wild was carried beaver (Castor fi ber L.) are being restored or out in small batches. The beavers were re- will be restored in many regions in Russia. -
2007 UNEP-WCMC Global List of Transboundary Protected Areas Lysenko I., Besançon C., Savy C
2007 UNEP-WCMC Global List of Transboundary Protected Areas Lysenko I., Besançon C., Savy C. No TBPA Name Country Protected Areas Sitecode Category PA Size, km 2 TBPA Area, km 2 Ellesmere/Greenland 1 Canada Quttinirpaaq 300093 II 38148.00 Transboundary Complex Greenland Hochstetter Forland 67910 RAMSAR 1848.20 Kilen 67911 RAMSAR 512.80 North-East Greenland 2065 MAB-BR 972000.00 North-East Greenland 650 II 972000.00 1,008,470.17 2 Canada Ivvavik 100672 II 10170.00 Old Crow Flats 101594 IV 7697.47 Vuntut 100673 II 4400.00 United States Arctic 2904 IV 72843.42 Arctic 35361 Ia 32374.98 Yukon Flats 10543 IV 34925.13 146,824.27 Alaska-Yukon-British Columbia 3 Canada Atlin 4178 II 2326.95 Borderlands Atlin 65094 II 384.45 Chilkoot Trail Nhp 167269 Unset 122.65 Kluane 612 II 22015.00 Kluane Wildlife 18707 VI 6450.00 Kluane/Wrangell-St Elias/Glacier Bay/Tatshenshini-Alsek 12200 WHC 31595.00 Tatshenshini-Alsek 67406 Ib 9470.26 United States Admiralty Island 21243 Ib 3803.76 Chilkat 68395 II 24.46 Chilkat Bald Eagle 68396 II 198.38 Glacier Bay 1010 II 13045.50 Glacier Bay 22485 V 233.85 Glacier Bay 35382 Ib 10784.27 Glacier Bay-Admiralty Island Biosphere Reserve 11591 MAB-BR 15150.15 Kluane/Wrangell-St Elias/Glacier Bay/Tatshenshini-Alsek 2018 WHC 66796.48 Kootznoowoo 101220 Ib 3868.24 Malaspina Glacier 21555 III 3878.40 Mendenhall River 306286 Unset 14.57 Misty Fiords 21247 Ib 8675.10 Misty Fjords 13041 IV 4622.75 Point Bridge 68394 II 11.64 Russell Fiord 21249 Ib 1411.15 Stikine-LeConte 21252 Ib 1816.75 Tetlin 2956 IV 2833.07 Tongass 13038 VI 67404.09 Global List of Transboundary Protected Areas ©2007 UNEP-WCMC 1 of 78 No TBPA Name Country Protected Areas Sitecode Category PA Size, km 2 TBPA Area, km 2 Tracy Arm-Fords Terror 21254 Ib 2643.43 Wrangell-St Elias 1005 II 33820.14 Wrangell-St Elias 35387 Ib 36740.24 Wrangell-St. -
Lake Baikal (Russian Federation) (N 754)/ Lac Baïkal (Fédération De Russie) (N754)
World Heritage 30 COM Patrimoine mondial Paris, 5 May / mai 2006 Original: English / anglais Distribution limited / limitée UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION ORGANISATION DES NATIONS UNIES POUR L'EDUCATION, LA SCIENCE ET LA CULTURE CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE CONVENTION CONCERNANT LA PROTECTION DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL, CULTUREL ET NATUREL WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE / COMITE DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL Thirtieth session / Trentième session Vilnius, Lithuania / Vilnius, Lituanie 08-16 July 2006 / 08-16 juillet 2006 Item 7 of the Provisional Agenda: State of conservation of properties inscribed on the World Heritage List and/or on the List of World Heritage in Danger. Point 7 de l’Ordre du jour provisoire: Etat de conservation de biens inscrits sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial et/ou sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial en péril REPORT OF THE JOINT UNESCO-IUCN REACTIVE MONITORING MISSION RAPPORT DE MISSION DE SUIVI REACTIF CONJOINTE DE L’UNESCO ET DE L’IUCN Lake Baikal (Russian Federation) (N 754)/ Lac Baïkal (Fédération de Russie) (N754) 21-31 October 2005 / 21-31 octobre 2005 This mission report should be read in conjunction with Document: Ce rapport de mission doit être lu conjointement avec le document suivant: WHC-06/30.COM/7A WHC-06/30.COM/7A.Add WHC-06/30.COM/7B WHC-06/30.COM/7B.Add 1 World Heritage Centre – IUCN Joint Mission to Lake Baikal World Heritage Property MISSION REPORT Reactive Monitoring Mission to Lake Baikal Russian Federation 21 – 31 October 2005 Pedro Rosabal (IUCN) Guy Debonnet (UNESCO) 2 Executive summary Following previous World Heritage Committee’s discussions on the State of Conservation of this property and, prompted by reports that works on a new oil pipeline started in May 2004 within the boundaries of the property, the World Heritage Committee at its 29th session (Durban, South Africa) requested a new monitoring mission to the property.