DOCSLIB.ORG

Miscellaneous Coastal Fishes Capture Production by Species, Fishing Areas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Miscellaneous Coastal Fishes Capture Production by Species, Fishing Areas 126 Miscellaneous coastal fishes Capture production by species, fishing areas and countries or areas B-33 Poissons côtiers divers Captures par espèces, zones de pêche et pays ou zones Peces costeros diversos Capturas por especies, áreas de pesca y países o áreas Species, Fishing area Espèce, Zone de pêche 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Especie, Área de pesca t t t t t t t t t t Hagfish Myxine Pez moco Myxine glutinosa 1,03(03)003,01 MYG 27 Denmark - - - - - - - - 4 58 27 Fishing area total - - - - - - - - 4 58 Species total - - - - - - - - 4 58 Broadgilled hagfish ...B ...C Eptatretus cirrhatus 1,03(03)006,03 MWC 81 New Zealand 508 347 364 1 142 307 114 144 371 247 106 81 Fishing area total 508 347 364 1 142 307 114 144 371 247 106 Species total 508 347 364 1 142 307 114 144 371 247 106 Hagfishes nei Mixynes nca Mixinos nep Myxinidae 1,03(03)XXX,XX MYX 21 USA 992 1 954 1 853 925 ... 782 1 246 894 1 000 849 21 Fishing area total 992 1 954 1 853 925 ... 782 1 246 894 1 000 849 61 Korea Rep 29 37 18 15 23 43 25 61 80 82 61 Fishing area total 29 37 18 15 23 43 25 61 80 82 67 USA 990 1 481 1 184 1 725 1 750 2 110 2 502 1 708 1 339 1 208 67 Fishing area total 990 1 481 1 184 1 725 1 750 2 110 2 502 1 708 1 339 1 208 77 USA 302 416 497 198 194 241 360 405 469 508 77 Fishing area total 302 416 497 198 194 241 360 405 469 508 Species total 2 313 3 888 3 552 2 863 1 967 3 176 4 133 3 068 2 888 2 647 Ladyfish Guinée-machète Malacho Elops saurus 1,29(01)003,02 LAD 21 USA 0 0 - - - 0 1 1 1 1 21 Fishing area total 0 0 - - - 0 1 1 1 1 31 Colombia 10 F 16 F 22 30 18 18 42 ... 1 1 Mexico 426 238 278 231 791 613 841 1 448 830 1 567 USA 538 406 271 712 146 488 652 639 647 1 065 31 Fishing area total 974 F 660 F 571 973 955 1 119 1 535 2 087 1 478 2 633 Species total 974 F 660 F 571 973 955 1 119 1 536 2 088 1 479 2 634 West African ladyfish Guinée d'Afrique occidentale Malacho de Africa occidental Elops lacerta 1,29(01)003,04 CEC 34 Benin 19 15 23 12 13 43 203 165 42 51 Comoros 35 - - 2 776 36 2 ... ... ... Gambia 962 941 982 982 1 150 F 1 320 987 1 304 1 384 1 040 Mauritania ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 8 0 0 Nigeria 442 658 732 814 978 1 192 1 202 1 249 1 227 1 217 Panama 43 - - 0 131 - - - - - Senegal 137 170 844 307 ... ... 69 83 ... ... Togo 24 10 F 1 ... ... - - - - - 34 Fishing area total 1 662 1 794 F 2 582 2 117 3 048 F 2 591 2 463 2 809 2 653 2 308 Species total 1 662 1 794 F 2 582 2 117 3 048 F 2 591 2 463 2 809 2 653 2 308 Tarpon Tarpon argenté Tarpón Megalops atlanticus 1,29(02)004,01 TAR 31 Colombia 5 F 5 F ... 20 18 30 11 8 1 1 Dominican Rp 21 37 33 35 170 166 89 86 61 43 Fr Guiana 44 30 25 24 F 30 F 35 F 26 F 27 F 27 F 25 F Mexico 1 1 1 ... 3 2 1 15 2 1 Puerto Rico 0 - 0 - - - - - - - Venezuela - - - - - - - 199 86 129 31 Fishing area total 71 F 73 F 59 79 F 221 F 233 F 127 F 335 F 177 F 199 F 41 Brazil 636 785 865 818 761 828 715 863 780 F 780 F 41 Fishing area total 636 785 865 818 761 828 715 863 780 F 780 F Species total 707 F 858 F 924 897 F 982 F 1 061 F 842 F 1 198 F 957 F 979 F Indo-Pacific tarpon Tarpon indo-pacifique Tarpón del Indo-Pacífico Megalops cyprinoides 1,29(02)004,02 TAI 57 Malaysia 36 21 29 30 19 32 19 27 33 47 57 Fishing area total 36 21 29 30 19 32 19 27 33 47 71 Malaysia 192 512 62 107 612 288 315 316 347 357 Philippines 1 281 1 326 1 388 1 542 1 522 1 438 1 315 1 189 1 137 1 178 71 Fishing area total 1 473 1 838 1 450 1 649 2 134 1 726 1 630 1 505 1 484 1 535 Species total 1 509 1 859 1 479 1 679 2 153 1 758 1 649 1 532 1 517 1 582 Bonefish Banane de mer Macabí Albula vulpes 1,30(01)005,01 BOF 31 Dominican Rp 40 35 32 34 164 160 ... 2 47 3 Venezuela - - - - - - - 159 160 132 31 Fishing area total 40 35 32 34 164 160 ... 161 207 135 34 Benin 6 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 127 Miscellaneous coastal fishes Capture production by species, fishing areas and countries or areas B-33 Poissons côtiers divers Captures par espèces, zones de pêche et pays ou zones Peces costeros diversos Capturas por especies, áreas de pesca y países o áreas Species, Fishing area Espèce, Zone de pêche 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Especie, Área de pesca t t t t t t t t t t Côte dIvoire 32 25 F 20 10 15 20 17 18 10 F 3 Gabon 0 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... Liberia 13 2 8 F 14 F 20 F 26 F 32 F 38 F 45 F 45 F Lithuania - - - - 150 - - - - - Senegal 17 38 10 10 ... 2 34 178 28 170 Sierra Leone 474 942 855 F 770 F 685 F 600 F 515 F 427 420 F 420 F 34 Fishing area total 542 1 007 F 893 F 804 F 870 F 648 F 598 F 661 F 503 F 638 F Species total 582 1 042 F 925 F 838 F 1 034 F 808 F 598 F 822 F 710 F 773 F Long snouted lancetfish Lancier longnez Lanzón picudo Alepisaurus ferox 1,31(07)022,01 ALX 27 Spain - - 5 - - - - - - - 27 Fishing area total - - 5 - - - - - - - 34 Spain - - - - 18 - - - - - 34 Fishing area total - - - - 18 - - - - - Species total - - 5 - 18 - - - - - Bombay-duck Scopelidé Bumalo Harpadon nehereus 1,31(16)001,02 BUC 04 India 321 504 634 331 314 484 680 700 F 750 F 815 F 04 Fishing area total 321 504 634 331 314 484 680 700 F 750 F 815 F 51 India 185 043 218 590 176 421 133 990 119 885 175 121 183 014 105 000 F 103 000 F 135 200 F Pakistan 45 49 44 44 38 45 48 39 46 31 51 Fishing area total 185 088 218 639 176 465 134 034 119 923 175 166 183 062 105 039 F 103 046 F 135 231 F 57 Bangladesh ... 36 980 58 263 59 374 60 750 62 817 71 745 51 673 53 950 58 545 India 26 520 15 513 17 090 21 941 16 621 12 708 13 281 7 646 F 7 417 F 9 751 F Indonesia 1 210 1 268 845 918 1 754 1 288 2 122 2 397 2 491 2 197 Malaysia ... 485 661 515 499 571 1 354 1 265 839 526 57 Fishing area total 27 730 54 246 76 859 82 748 79 624 77 384 88 502 62 981 F 64 697 F 71 019 F 71 Indonesia 4 540 5 101 5 424 6 058 5 461 2 237 2 402 2 573 1 322 1 585 Malaysia ... 1 906 2 440 2 135 2 247 2 113 2 473 2 557 2 617 2 354 71 Fishing area total 4 540 7 007 7 864 8 193 7 708 4 350 4 875 5 130 3 939 3 939 Species total 217 679 280 396 261 822 225 306 207 569 257 384 277 119 173 850 F 172 432 F 211 004 F Atlantic lizardfish ...B ...C Synodus saurus 1,31(16)010,03 SDR 37 Malta ... ... 0 2 0 0 0 ... 0 0 37 Fishing area total ... ... 0 2 0 0 0 ... 0 0 Species total ... ... 0 2 0 0 0 ... 0 0 Greater lizardfish Anoli tumbil Lagarto tumbil Saurida tumbil 1,31(16)068,01 LIG 51 Iran 2 575 2 564 3 030 3 393 2 976 4 353 6 398 4 496 5 475 5 314 51 Fishing area total 2 575 2 564 3 030 3 393 2 976 4 353 6 398 4 496 5 475 5 314 57 Indonesia 5 468 4 912 7 106 5 485 6 407 7 004 6 613 6 762 6 395 4 038 57 Fishing area total 5 468 4 912 7 106 5 485 6 407 7 004 6 613 6 762 6 395 4 038 61 China,Taiwan 1 885 1 328 1 457 1 186 1 189 908 1 096 1 158 607 301 61 Fishing area total 1 885 1 328 1 457 1 186 1 189 908 1 096 1 158 607 301 71 Indonesia 20 961 15 483 15 851 13 345 15 256 13 437 14 254 15 521 11 145 9 805 71 Fishing area total 20 961 15 483 15 851 13 345 15 256 13 437 14 254 15 521 11 145 9 805 Species total 30 889 24 287 27 444 23 409 25 828 25 702 28 361 27 937 23 622 19 458 Brushtooth lizardfish Anoli à grandes écailles Lagarto escamoso Saurida undosquamis 1,31(16)068,04 LIB 37 Israel 49 66 F 83 141 36 43 82 82 F 82 F 82 F 37 Fishing area total 49 66 F 83 141 36 43 82 82 F 82 F 82 F 51 Kuwait 23 17 28 33 15 24 9 9 12 10 51 Fishing area total 23 17 28 33 15 24 9 9 12 10 61 Korea Rep 349 102 279 - - - - - - - 61 Fishing area total 349 102 279 - - - - - - - Species total 421 185 F 390 174 51 67 91 91 F 94 F 92 F Lizardfishes nei Anolis nca Lagartos nep Synodontidae 1,31(16)XXX,XX LIX 37 Cyprus - - - - 0 1 1 4 5 6 Egypt 1 971 1 862 1 600 1 960 2 371 1 304 821 853 710 608 Palest, O.T.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Megan E
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School November 2017 Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Megan E. Hepner University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Biology Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Other Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons Scholar Commons Citation Hepner, Megan E., "Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary" (2017). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/7408 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary by Megan E. Hepner A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Marine Science with a concentration in Marine Resource Assessment College of Marine Science University of South Florida Major Professor: Frank Muller-Karger, Ph.D. Christopher Stallings, Ph.D. Steve Gittings, Ph.D. Date of Approval: October 31st, 2017 Keywords: Species richness, biodiversity, functional diversity, species traits Copyright © 2017, Megan E. Hepner ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am indebted to my major advisor, Dr. Frank Muller-Karger, who provided opportunities for me to strengthen my skills as a researcher on research cruises, dive surveys, and in the laboratory, and as a communicator through oral and presentations at conferences, and for encouraging my participation as a full team member in various meetings of the Marine Biodiversity Observation Network (MBON) and other science meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • A Practical Handbook for Determining the Ages of Gulf of Mexico And
    A Practical Handbook for Determining the Ages of Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Coast Fishes THIRD EDITION GSMFC No. 300 NOVEMBER 2020 i Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission Commissioners and Proxies ALABAMA Senator R.L. “Bret” Allain, II Chris Blankenship, Commissioner State Senator District 21 Alabama Department of Conservation Franklin, Louisiana and Natural Resources John Roussel Montgomery, Alabama Zachary, Louisiana Representative Chris Pringle Mobile, Alabama MISSISSIPPI Chris Nelson Joe Spraggins, Executive Director Bon Secour Fisheries, Inc. Mississippi Department of Marine Bon Secour, Alabama Resources Biloxi, Mississippi FLORIDA Read Hendon Eric Sutton, Executive Director USM/Gulf Coast Research Laboratory Florida Fish and Wildlife Ocean Springs, Mississippi Conservation Commission Tallahassee, Florida TEXAS Representative Jay Trumbull Carter Smith, Executive Director Tallahassee, Florida Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas LOUISIANA Doug Boyd Jack Montoucet, Secretary Boerne, Texas Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Baton Rouge, Louisiana GSMFC Staff ASMFC Staff Mr. David M. Donaldson Mr. Bob Beal Executive Director Executive Director Mr. Steven J. VanderKooy Mr. Jeffrey Kipp IJF Program Coordinator Stock Assessment Scientist Ms. Debora McIntyre Dr. Kristen Anstead IJF Staff Assistant Fisheries Scientist ii A Practical Handbook for Determining the Ages of Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Coast Fishes Third Edition Edited by Steve VanderKooy Jessica Carroll Scott Elzey Jessica Gilmore Jeffrey Kipp Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission 2404 Government St Ocean Springs, MS 39564 and Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission 1050 N. Highland Street Suite 200 A-N Arlington, VA 22201 Publication Number 300 November 2020 A publication of the Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award Number NA15NMF4070076 and NA15NMF4720399.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report Characterization of Commercial Reef Fish Catch And
    SEDAR 15-RD07 Final Report Characterization of commercial reef fish catch and bycatch off the southeast coast of the United States. CRP Grant No. NA03NMF4540416 Funding amount: $100,000 Federal $4,130 Match Patrick J. Harris and Jessica Stephen Marine Resources Research Institute South Carolina Department of Natural Resources 217 Fort Johnson Road P.O. Box 12559 Charleston, SC 29412 I. Characterization of commercial reef fish catch and bycatch off the southeast coast of the United States. Patrick J. Harris, South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, Charleston, SC 29412. Grant Number: NA03NMF4540416 July 2005. II. Abstract There is clearly a need to characterize the entire catch of commercial fishermen and compare differences in abundance and species diversity to what is caught in fishery-independent gear. As we move towards a multi-species management approach, these types of data are essential. In addition, estimates of release mortality are needed for stock assessments but currently this is not being measured for fishery-dependent data. Many reef fishes captured at depths greater than ~ 20 m often have problems submerging when released by commercial fishermen. The goal of the research project was to characterize the entire (retained and discarded) catch of reef fishes from a selected commercial fisherman including total catch composition and disposition of fishes that were released. During April- November 2004, Captain Mark Marhefka dedicated one fishing trip (5-7 day duration) each month to the collection of fishery-dependent data. Date, location and collection number were recorded for each site fished by Captain Marhefka using a PDA equipped with a GPS.
    [Show full text]
  • Golden Tilefish Interim Measures
    Specification of Annual Catch Limits for Golden Tilefish (Lopholatilus chamaeleonticeps) in the South Atlantic Region Golden Tilefish Interim Measures Environmental Assessment Regulatory Flexibility Analysis September 28, 2017 Definitions, Abbreviations, and Acronyms Used in the Document ABC acceptable biological catch M natural mortality rate ACL annual catch limits MAGNUSON-STEVENS ACT Magnuson-Stevens ACT annual catch target Fishery Conservation and Management Act ALS Accumulated Landings System MARMAP Marine Resources Monitoring Assessment and Prediction Program AM accountability measures MFMT maximum fishing mortality threshold ASFMC Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission MMPA Marine Mammal Protection Act B a measure of stock biomass in either weight or other appropriate unit MRFSS Marine Recreational Fisheries Statistics Survey BMSY the stock biomass expected to exist under equilibrium conditions when fishing at FMSY MRIP Marine Recreational Information Program BCURR the current stock biomass MSST minimum stock size threshold COUNCIL South Atlantic Fishery Management Council MSY maximum sustainable yield CS consumer surplus NARW North Atlantic Right Whale DPS distinct population segment NEPA National Environmental Policy Act EEZ exclusive economic zone NMFS National Marine Fisheries Service EFH essential fish habitat NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration EFH-HAPC essential fish habitat-habitat areas of NOR net operating revenue particular concern OY optimum yield ESA Endangered Species Act PS producer surplus
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Productivity and Susceptibility Indices to Determine the Vulnerability of a Stock: with Example Applications to Six U.S
    Use of productivity and susceptibility indices to determine the vulnerability of a stock: with example applications to six U.S. fisheries. Wesley S. Patrick1, Paul Spencer2, Olav Ormseth2, Jason Cope3, John Field4, Donald Kobayashi5, Todd Gedamke6, Enric Cortés7, Keith Bigelow5, William Overholtz8, Jason Link8, and Peter Lawson9. 1NOAA, National Marine Fisheries Service, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, 1315 East- West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910; 2 NOAA, National Marine Fisheries Service, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, 7600 Sand Point Way, Seattle, WA 98115; 3NOAA, National Marine Fisheries Service, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, 2725 Montlake Boulevard East, Seattle, WA 98112; 4NOAA, National Marine Fisheries Service, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, 110 Shaffer Road, Santa Cruz, CA 95060; 5NOAA, National Marine Fisheries Service, Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center, 2570 Dole Street, Honolulu, HI 96822; 6NOAA, National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, 75 Virginia Beach Drive, Miami, FL 33149; 7NOAA, National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, 3500 Delwood Beach Road, Panama City, FL 32408; 8NOAA, National Marine Fisheries Service, Northeast Fisheries Science Center, 166 Water Street, Woods Hole, MA 02543; 9NOAA, National Marine Fisheries Service, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, 2030 South Marine Science Drive, Newport, OR 97365. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Wesley S. Patrick, NOAA, National Marine Fisheries Service, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, 1315 East-West
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Phylogeny of Mugilidae (Teleostei: Perciformes) D
    The Open Marine Biology Journal, 2008, 2, 29-37 29 Molecular Phylogeny of Mugilidae (Teleostei: Perciformes) D. Aurelle1, R.-M. Barthelemy*,2, J.-P. Quignard3, M. Trabelsi4 and E. Faure2 1UMR 6540 DIMAR, Station Marine d'Endoume, Rue de la Batterie des Lions, 13007 Marseille, France 2LATP, UMR 6632, Evolution Biologique et Modélisation, case 18, Université de Provence, 3 Place Victor Hugo, 13331 Marseille Cedex 3, France 3Laboratoire d’Ichtyologie, Université Montpellier II, 34095 Montpellier, France 4Unité de Biologie marine, Faculté des Sciences, Campus Universitaire, 2092 Manar II, Tunis, Tunisie Abstract: Molecular phylogenetic relationships among five genera and twelve Mugilidae species were investigated us- ing published mitochondrial cytochrome b and 16S rDNA sequences. These analyses suggested the paraphyly of the genus Liza and also that the separation of Liza, Chelon and Oedalechilus might be unnatural. Moreover, all the species of the genus Mugil plus orthologs of Crenimugil crenilabis clustered together; however, molecular analyses suggested possible introgressions in Mugil cephalus and moreover, that fish identified as Mugil curema could correspond to two different species as already shown by karyotypic analyses. Keywords: Mugilidae, grey mullets, mitochondrial DNA, Mugil cephalus, introgression. INTRODUCTION We have focused this study on Mugilid species for which both cytochrome b (cytb) and 16S rDNA mtDNA sequences The family Mugilidae, commonly referred to as grey have been already published. Their geographic distributions mullets, includes several species which have a worldwide are briefly presented here. Oedalechilus labeo is limited to distribution; they inhabit marine, estuarine, and freshwater the Mediterranean Sea and the Moroccan Atlantic coast, environments at all latitudes except the Polar Regions [1]; a whereas, Liza and Chelon inhabit also the Eastern Atlantic few spend all their lives in freshwater [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Snapper Grouper Regulatory Amendment 29 and These Data Provided the Basis for the Council’S Decisions
    Photo: Brendan Runde, Department of Applied Ecology, NCSU Regulatory Amendment 29 to the Fishery Management Plan for the Snapper Grouper Fishery of the South Atlantic Region Gear Requirement Modifications Environmental Assessment | Regulatory Impact Review | Regulatory Flexibility Analysis January 2020 A publication of the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award Number FNA10NMF4410012 Definitions, Abbreviations and Acronyms Used in the FMP ABC acceptable biological catch FMP fishery management plan ACL annual catch limit FMU fishery management unit AM accountability measure M natural mortality rate ACT annual catch target MARMAP Marine Resources Monitoring Assessment and Prediction Program B a measure of stock biomass in either weight or other appropriate unit MFMT maximum fishing mortality threshold BMSY the stock biomass expected to exist under equilibrium conditions when MMPA Marine Mammal Protection Act fishing at FMSY MRFSS Marine Recreational Fisheries BOY the stock biomass expected to exist Statistics Survey under equilibrium conditions when fishing at FOY MRIP Marine Recreational Information Program BCURR The current stock biomass MSFCMA Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act CPUE catch per unit effort MSST minimum stock size threshold DEIS draft environmental impact statement MSY maximum sustainable yield EA environmental assessment NEPA National Environmental Policy Act EEZ exclusive economic zone NMFS National Marine Fisheries Service EFH
    [Show full text]
  • Flora and Fauna
    AQUIS RESORT AT THE GREAT BARRIER REEF PTY LTD ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT VOLUME 1 CHAPTER 7 FLORA AND FAUNA 7. FLORA AND FAUNA 7.1 EXISTING SITUATION 7.1.1 Scope This chapter addresses the matters listed in the ToR under the heading ‘Flora and Fauna’. These ToR include broad matters of environmental significance, ecosystems, and biodiversity and cover a wide range of often interrelated topics. These are discussed as follows: sensitive environmental areas matters of national environmental significance and state environmental significance* terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems* listed flora* listed fauna* listed migratory birds* overall biodiversity ecological processes and integrity* Ramsar wetlands and migratory bird agreements* fish and fisheries resources. Details of threats to biodiversity from pest plants and animals are provided in Chapter 19 (Biosecurity). Matters designated by an asterisk (*) can involve either or both Queensland and Commonwealth legislation. Chapter 22 (Matters of NES) deals specifically with the issues designated above from a Commonwealth perspective. Cross references between these chapters are provided as appropriate. 7.1.2 Information Sources This chapter draws heavily on technical assessments based on terrestrial and aquatic surveys as follows: July 2013 (aquatic – Appendix F; terrestrial – Appendix G) October 2013 (aquatic – Appendix F; terrestrial – Appendix G) February / March 2014 (aquatic – Addendum 1 of Appendix F; terrestrial – Appendix G); off- shore lake pipeline – Appendix H). It also refers to the protected matters search (Appendix I) and a range of government and private data sources. Aquis Resort at The Great Barrier Reef Revision: Final Environmental Impact Statement - June 2014 Page 7-1 7.1.3 Sensitive Environmental Areas Although the site is largely cleared, it is surrounded by remnant coastal vegetation and marine areas, most of which are sensitive environmental areas protected under a raft of Queensland legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • Mullets and the Impact of the Environmental Status of Burgas Bay on Their Populations
    Annual of Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski” Faculty of Biology Book 4 - Scientific Sessions of theFaculty of Biology 2019, volume 104, pp. 62-69 International Scientific Conference “Kliment’s Days”, Sofia 2018 MULLETS AND THE IMPACT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS OF BURGAS BAY ON THEIR POPULATIONS RADOSLAVA BEKOVA1*, BOGDAN PRODANOV2, TODOR LAMBEV2 1 – Department of Marine Biology and Ecology, Institute of Oceanology–BAS, Varna, Bulgaria 2 - Department of Coastal Zone Dynamics, Institute of Oceanology–BAS, Varna, Bulgaria *Corresponding author: [email protected] Keywords: environmental assessment, mullets, population parameters, Burgas Bay Abstract: An ecosystem approach has been chosen for an assessment of the status of the populations of three mullet species in Burgas Bay. The complex data requirements for all three species and physicochemical parameters plus sediment are the basis for a comparative assessment of the population status of mullets in Burgas Bay. An assessment of the local anthropogenic impact was also made using hydrochemical analyses. The present study aims to extend and deepen the knowledge of the population- biological characteristics of three species of mullets (Mugil cephalus, Chelon auratus and Chelon saliens) from Burgas Bay by using an ecosystem scale research to determine the degree of contamination with biogenic substances and their impact on the mullet populations. INTRODUCTION Environmental changes due to anthropogenic factors affect all parts of the plant and animal world in inland waters, seas and oceans. The Black Sea is close to the so-called "red line" beyond which ecosystem degradation processes may become irreversible. Commercial fishing is the most unfavorable factor as it directly destroys a significant part of the populations of certain species, which in terms affects all other species that are in strictly specific relationships with the intensely exploited ones.
    [Show full text]
  • Saltwater Fish Identification Guide
    Identification Guide To South Carolina Fishes Inshore Fishes Red Drum (Spottail, redfish, channel bass, puppy drum,) Sciaenops ocellatus May have multiple spots along dorsal surface.. RKW Black Drum Pogonias cromis Broad black vertical bars along body. Barbells on chin. Spotted Seatrout (Winter trout, speckled trout) Cynoscion nebulosus Numerous distinct black spots on dorsal surface. Most commonly encountered in rivers and estuaries. RKW Most commonly encountered just offshore around live bottom and artificial reefs. Weakfish (Summer trout, Gray trout) Cynoscion regalis RKW Silver coloration with no spots. Large eye Silver Seatrout Cynoscion nothus RKW Spot Leiostomus xanthurus Distinct spot on shoulder. RKW Atlantic Croaker (Hardhead) Micropogonias undulatus RKW Silver Perch (Virginia Perch) Bairdiella chrysoura RKW Sheepshead Archosargus probatocephalus Broad black vertical bars along body. RKW Pinfish (Sailors Choice) Lagodon rhomboides Distinct spot. RKW Southern Kingfish (Whiting) Menticirrhus americanus RKW Extended 1st dorsal filament Northern Kingfish SEAMAP- Menticirrhus saxatilis SA:RPW Dusky 1st dorsal-fin tip Black caudal fin tip Gulf Kingfish SEAMAP- Menticirrhus littoralis SA:RPW Southern flounder Paralichthys lethostigma No ocellated spots . RKW Summer flounder Paralichthys dentatus Five ocellated spots in this distinct pattern. B. Floyd Gulf flounder Paralichthys albigutta B. Floyd Three ocellated spots in a triangle pattern. B. Floyd Bluefish Pomatomus saltatrix RKW Inshore Lizardfish Synodus foetens RKW RKW Ladyfish Elops saurus Florida Pompano Trachinotus carolinus RKW Lookdown Selene vomer RKW Spadefish Chaetodipterus faber Juvenile RKW Juvenile spadefish are commonly found in SC estuaries. Adults, which look very similar to the specimen shown above, are common inhabitants of offshore reefs. Cobia Rachycentron canadum Adult D. Hammond Juvenile RKW D.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Juveniles of Grey Mullet Species (Teleostei
    Cah. Biol. Mar. (2008) 49 : 269-276 Identification of juveniles of grey mullet species (Teleostei: Perciformes) from Kuriat Islands (Tunisia) and evidence of gene flow between Atlantic and Mediterranean Liza aurata Monia TRABELSI1, Didier AURELLE2, Nawzet BOURIGA1,4, Jean-Pierre QUIGNARD3, Jean-Paul CASANOVA4 and Eric FAURE4* (1) Unité de Biologie marine, Faculté des Sciences, Campus Universitaire, 2092 Manar II, Tunis, Tunisie (2) UMR 6540 DIMAR, Station Marine d'Endoume, Rue de la batterie des Lions, 13007 Marseille, France (3) Laboratoire d’Ichtyologie, Université Montpellier II, Montpellier, France (4) LATP, CNRS-UMR 6632, Evolution biologique et modélisation, case 5, Université de Provence, Place Victor Hugo, 13331 Marseille cedex 3, France *Corresponding author: Tel: 00 (33) 491 10 61 77, Fax: 00 (33) 491 10 62 25, E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Unidentified juveniles of a grey mullet species from the Kuriat Islands (Tunisia) were compared with Mediterranean and Atlantic candidate species (Mugil spp. or Liza spp.) using a mitochondrial gene (cytochrome b). These analyses have shown that juveniles are L. aurata individuals; phylogenetic analyses supported this grouping with very high bootstrap values and also shown evidence of gene flow between Atlantic and Mediterranean populations. Moreover, phylogenetic analyses were congruent with the analyses of the number of pyloric caeca. As mugilid juveniles for aquaculture are still obtained from wild stocks, these data provided a valuable baseline for further investigations on identification of these fish. Moreover, using the polymerase chain reaction, sufficient DNA for phylogenetic analyses can be amplified from very small portions of caudal fins and these samples can be collected without sacrificing individuals, which is one important requirement for the study of species that young fry is used for stocking lagoons and lakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Training Manual Series No.15/2018
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CMFRI Digital Repository DBTR-H D Indian Council of Agricultural Research Ministry of Science and Technology Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute Department of Biotechnology CMFRI Training Manual Series No.15/2018 Training Manual In the frame work of the project: DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals 2015-18 Training Manual In the frame work of the project: DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals 2015-18 Training Manual This is a limited edition of the CMFRI Training Manual provided to participants of the “DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals” organized by the Marine Biotechnology Division of Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (CMFRI), from 2nd February 2015 - 31st March 2018. Principal Investigator Dr. P. Vijayagopal Compiled & Edited by Dr. P. Vijayagopal Dr. Reynold Peter Assisted by Aditya Prabhakar Swetha Dhamodharan P V ISBN 978-93-82263-24-1 CMFRI Training Manual Series No.15/2018 Published by Dr A Gopalakrishnan Director, Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (ICAR-CMFRI) Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute PB.No:1603, Ernakulam North P.O, Kochi-682018, India. 2 Foreword Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (CMFRI), Kochi along with CIFE, Mumbai and CIFA, Bhubaneswar within the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) and Department of Biotechnology of Government of India organized a series of training programs entitled “DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals”.
    [Show full text]