Lonicera Subspicata Hooker & Arnott Var. Denudata Rehder
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Botany Biological Evaluation
APPENDIX I Botany Biological Evaluation Biological Evaluation for Threatened, Endangered and Sensitive Plants and Fungi Page 1 of 35 for the Upper Truckee River Sunset Stables Restoration Project November 2009 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE – FOREST SERVICE LAKE TAHOE BASIN MANAGEMENT UNIT Upper Truckee River Sunset Stables Restoration Project El Dorado County, CA Biological Evaluation for Threatened, Endangered and Sensitive Plants and Fungi PREPARED BY: ENTRIX, Inc. DATE: November 2009 APPROVED BY: DATE: _____________ Name, Forest Botanist, Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit SUMMARY OF EFFECTS DETERMINATION AND MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS AND/OR REQUIREMENTS One population of a special-status bryophyte, three-ranked hump-moss (Meesia triquetra), was observed in the survey area during surveys on June 30, 2008 and August 28, 2008. The proposed action will not affect the moss because the population is located outside the project area where no action is planned. The following species of invasive or noxious weeds were identified during surveys of the Project area: cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum); bullthistle (Cirsium vulgare); Klamathweed (Hypericum perforatum); oxe-eye daisy (Leucanthemum vulgare); and common mullein (Verbascum Thapsus). The threat posed by these weed populations would not increase if the proposed action is implemented. An inventory and assessment of invasive and noxious weeds in the survey area is presented in the Noxious Weed Risk Assessment for the Upper Truckee River Sunset Stables Restoration Project (ENTRIX 2009). Based on the description of the proposed action and the evaluation contained herein, we have determined the following: There would be no significant effect to plant species listed as threatened, endangered, proposed for listing, or candidates under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA), administered by the U.S. -
4.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 4.3.1 Existing Conditions Methodology
4.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 4.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES This section identifies biological resources present on the project site and assesses the project’s impacts upon those resources. It is based on previous biological resource assessments for the site (conducted for the applicant) and a review of those assessments and supplemental field surveys and research conducted by the City’s EIR consultant. Since the Notice of Preparation was published March 9, 2010, the applicant has undertaken minimal amount of site disturbance activity for environmental research and maintenance. These activities involved conducting cultural resources investigations in March 2011, fuel maintenance as required by the County Fire Department in May 2011, and geotechnical exploration of the project site to assess possible construction design (i.e. foundation designs) on June 13-15, 2011. Each of these activities was planned and monitored to avoid any significant biological resources. Fuel modification is conducted on an ongoing basis once every three months. 4.3.1 Existing Conditions This section discusses the regional setting, project site conditions, and the existing and potentially occurring biological resources at the project site. Biological resources within the surrounding area are also discussed, when relevant. Methodology The description of existing conditions provided below is based on a literature review and site surveys. Literature Review The literature review included previous site-specific and non site-specific studies and California Department of Fish and -
(Lonicera L.) Genties Atstovų Genetinės Įvairovės Ir Filogenetiniai Tyrimai Dnr Ţymenų Metodais
VILNIAUS UNIVERSITETAS Donatas Naugţemys SAUSMEDŢIO (LONICERA L.) GENTIES ATSTOVŲ GENETINĖS ĮVAIROVĖS IR FILOGENETINIAI TYRIMAI DNR ŢYMENŲ METODAIS Daktaro disertacija Biomedicinos mokslai, biologija (01 B) Vilnius, 2011 Disertacija rengta 2006 – 2010 metais Vilniaus universitete. Mokslinis vadovas: prof. dr. Donatas Ţvingila (Vilniaus universitetas, biomedicinos mokslai, biologija – 01 B) Konsultantas: dr. Silva Ţilinskaitė (Vilniaus universitetas, biomedicinos mokslai, biologija – 01 B) 2 TURINYS SANTRUMPOS ..................................................................................................... 5 ĮVADAS ................................................................................................................. 7 I. LITERATŪROS APŢVALGA ......................................................................... 13 1. Sausmedţio genties apţvalga ....................................................................... 13 1.1. Lonicera L. genties sistematikos istorija ir problemos .......................... 15 1.2. Lonicera L. genties kilmė ...................................................................... 21 2. Molekuliniai ţymenys ir augalų filogenetiniai tyrimai ................................ 24 2.1. RAPD metodo taikymas augalų sistematikoje ...................................... 26 2.2. Chloroplastų DNR nekoduojančių specifinių regionų tyrimas sekoskaitos metodu .............................................................................................. 31 2.3. Lonicera L. genties filogenetikos molekuliniai tyrimai -
Franklin Canyon Trail, Carpinteria/Santa Ynez Mountains
New Franklin Trail, Carpinteria January 2015 By Andrea Adams-Morden This preliminary checklist covers the new (lower) stretch of the Franklin Canyon Trail, including only the short riparian zone after the bridge and the trail after the fence stops to the 2015 gate on the Southern California Edison easement access road. * = non-native plants Lycophites Selaginellaceae – Spike-moss Family Selaginella bigelovii Bigelow’s Spike Moss Ferns Polypodiaceae – Polypody Fern Family Pellaea andromedifolia Coffee Fern Pentagramma triangularis Goldback Fern Polypodium californicum California Polypody Polystichum munitum Western Sword Fern Eudicots Adoxaceae - Muskroot Family Sambucus nigra ssp. caerulea [S. mexicana] Blue Elderberry Anacardiaceae - Sumac Family Malosma laurina Laurel Sumac Toxicodendron diversilobum Western Poison Oak Apiaceae - Parsley Family Foeniculum vulgare Sweet Fennel* Sanicula crassicaulis Cut-leafed Sanicle Apocynaceae - Dogbane Family Araujia seicifera Bladder Pod Vine* Vinca major Periwinkle* Araliaceae - Aralia Family Hedra sp. Ivy* Asteraceae - Sunflower Family Artemisia californica California Sagebrush Baccharis pilularis ssp. consanguinea Coyote Brush Bidens pilosa Beggar's Ticks* Brickellia californica California Brickell Bush Centaurea melitensis Tocalote * Corethrogyne [Lessingia] filaginifolia California Cudweed-aster Delaria oderata Cape Ivy* Encelia californica Coastal Bush Sunflower Erigeron foliosus var. foliosus Leafy Fleabane Y:\Floras\Calif-FP\SW\TR\WTR\SantaYnezMts\New Franklin Trail Carpinteria.doc.odt 3/27/2015 -
Upper Arroyo Seco Habitat Enhancement Plan
Upper Arroyo Seco Habitat Enhancement Plan Pasadena, Los Angeles County, California Prepared for City of Pasadena Department of Water and Power 100 North Garfield Avenue, Room N306 Pasadena, California 91109 Contact: Elisa Ventura, P.E. T: (626) 744-4465 Prepared by Psomas 225 South Lake Avenue, Suite 1000 Pasadena, California 91101 Contact: Marc Blain, Senior Project Manager/Biologist T: (626) 351-2000 F: (626) 351-2030 August 2019 Upper Arroyo Seco Habitat Enhancement Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Location ..................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Relevant Plans, Policies, and Regulations ................................................................... 3 2.1 Hahamongna Watershed Park Master Plan .......................................................... 3 2.2 Arroyo Seco Watershed Management and Restoration Plan ................................ 3 2.3 Angeles National Forest Land Management Plan ................................................. 3 2.4 USDA-FS Weed Management Strategy ................................................................ 4 2.5 Integrated Regional Water Management Plan ...................................................... 4 2.6 One Arroyo Report ................................................................................................ 5 2.7 Arroyos & Foothills Conservancy ......................................................................... -
Vegetation Alliances of the San Dieguito River Park Region, San Diego County, California
Vegetation alliances of the San Dieguito River Park region, San Diego County, California By Julie Evens and Sau San California Native Plant Society 2707 K Street, Suite 1 Sacramento CA, 95816 In cooperation with the California Natural Heritage Program of the California Department of Fish and Game And San Diego Chapter of the California Native Plant Society Final Report August 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction...................................................................................................................................... 1 Methods ........................................................................................................................................... 2 Study area ................................................................................................................................... 2 Existing Literature Review........................................................................................................... 2 Sampling ..................................................................................................................................... 2 Figure 1. Study area including the San Dieguito River Park boundary within the ecological subsections color map and within the County inset map............................................................ 3 Figure 2. Locations of the field surveys....................................................................................... 5 Cluster analyses for vegetation classification ............................................................................ -
APPENDIX B Biological Resources Reports
APPENDIX B Biological Resources Reports July 10, 2020 JN 178669 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR Attn: Mr. Ryan Wright 21810 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 SUBJECT: Results of a Biological Resources Assessment of the Canyon Loop Trail Improvement Project– City of Diamond Bar, Los Angeles County, California Dear Mr. Wright: Michael Baker International (Michael Baker) is pleased to submit this report to the City of Diamond Bar documenting the results of a biological resources assessment of the Canyon Loop Trail Improvement Project (project) located in the City of Diamond Bar, Los Angeles County, California. Michael Baker conducted a literature review and a field survey to characterize existing site conditions and assess the potential for special-status1 plant and wildlife species to occur on or within the immediate vicinity of the project site that could pose a constraint to future development. Specifically, this report provides a detailed assessment of the suitability of the on-site habitat to support special-status plant and wildlife species that were identified by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) RareFind 5 (CDFW 2020a), the CNDDB Biogeographic Information and Observation System (BIOS; CDFW 2020b), the California Native Plant Society (CNPS) Online Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California (Online Inventory; CNPS 2020), and other databases as potentially occurring in the vicinity of the project site. Project Location The survey area include the project site plus a 500-foot buffer, and is generally located south of State Route 60, east of State Route 57, north of Grand Avenue, and west of Chino Hills Parkway in the City of Diamond Bar, Los Angeles County, California (refer to Figure 1, Regional Vicinity, in Attachment A). -
Checklist of the Vascular Plants of San Diego County 5Th Edition
cHeckliSt of tHe vaScUlaR PlaNtS of SaN DieGo coUNty 5th edition Pinus torreyana subsp. torreyana Downingia concolor var. brevior Thermopsis californica var. semota Pogogyne abramsii Hulsea californica Cylindropuntia fosbergii Dudleya brevifolia Chorizanthe orcuttiana Astragalus deanei by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson San Diego Natural History Museum and San Diego State University examples of checklist taxa: SPecieS SPecieS iNfRaSPecieS iNfRaSPecieS NaMe aUtHoR RaNk & NaMe aUtHoR Eriodictyon trichocalyx A. Heller var. lanatum (Brand) Jepson {SD 135251} [E. t. subsp. l. (Brand) Munz] Hairy yerba Santa SyNoNyM SyMBol foR NoN-NATIVE, NATURaliZeD PlaNt *Erodium cicutarium (L.) Aiton {SD 122398} red-Stem Filaree/StorkSbill HeRBaRiUM SPeciMeN coMMoN DocUMeNTATION NaMe SyMBol foR PlaNt Not liSteD iN THE JEPSON MANUAL †Rhus aromatica Aiton var. simplicifolia (Greene) Conquist {SD 118139} Single-leaF SkunkbruSH SyMBol foR StRict eNDeMic TO SaN DieGo coUNty §§Dudleya brevifolia (Moran) Moran {SD 130030} SHort-leaF dudleya [D. blochmaniae (Eastw.) Moran subsp. brevifolia Moran] 1B.1 S1.1 G2t1 ce SyMBol foR NeaR eNDeMic TO SaN DieGo coUNty §Nolina interrata Gentry {SD 79876} deHeSa nolina 1B.1 S2 G2 ce eNviRoNMeNTAL liStiNG SyMBol foR MiSiDeNtifieD PlaNt, Not occURRiNG iN coUNty (Note: this symbol used in appendix 1 only.) ?Cirsium brevistylum Cronq. indian tHiStle i checklist of the vascular plants of san Diego county 5th edition by Jon p. rebman and Michael g. simpson san Diego natural history Museum and san Diego state university publication of: san Diego natural history Museum san Diego, california ii Copyright © 2014 by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson Fifth edition 2014. isBn 0-918969-08-5 Copyright © 2006 by Jon P. -
A California-Friendly Guide to Native and Drought Tolerant Gardens
A California-Friendly Guide to Native and Drought Tolerant Gardens 1 Scale: 1/4” = 1’ 2 WELCOME to our newest edition of “A California-Friendly Guide to Native and Drought Tolerant Gardens”, a collection of plants featured in our customer newsletter, The Current Flow, plus useful information. This publication is intended to help beginning and experienced gardeners become familiar with the different varieties of plants that can help reduce water usage while providing a pleasing and attractive landscape. Native and drought tolerant plants are important for this region, not just because they are water efficient, but because they are the cornerstone of biological diversity and the foundations of the native ecosystems in our local Santa Monica Mountains environment. Using “California-friendly” plants for everything from backyard gardens to wide scale re-vegetation is a positive practice that will benefit the local habitat and all residents who live here. With our current climate conditions of increasing warmth and less moisture, more and more Californians are becoming interested in replacing high-maintenance, lawns that require a lot of water and fertilizers, with water-conserving plants. These can be anything from ground covers to a field of meadow flowers to stately oak trees – they all provide the benefits of lower water needs, reduced maintenance requirements, restored soil health, increased diversity that attracts birds and butterflies, as well as the aesthetic beauty of blending in with the natural landscapes. Visit www.LVMWD.com for conservation information including irrigation tips, how to obtain and use Community Compost, rebate programs, how to register for landscape and garden classes, controlling urban runoff, and more. -
Appendix D Vascular Plant Species Observed
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. CITY OF MONROVIA HILLSIDE WILDERNESS PRESERVE AND HILLSIDE RECREATION AREA AUGUST 2008 DRAFT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN CITY OF MONROVIA, CALIFORNIA APPENDIX D VASCULAR PLANT SPECIES OBSERVED P:\CNV0601\Management Plan\Final Management Plan- August 2008\Final Admin Draft.doc (08/08/08) D-1 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. CITY OF MONROVIA HILLSIDE WILDERNESS PRESERVE AND HILLSIDE RECREATION AREA AUGUST 2008 DRAFT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN CITY OF MONROVIA, CALIFORNIA APPENDIX D VASCULAR PLANT SPECIES OBSERVED The following vascular plant species were observed or documented as having a high potential to occur in the study area by various biologists during the course of on-site surveys. * Introduced nonnative species Scientific Name Common Name Observed PTERIDOPHYTA FERNS AND FERN-ALLIES Dryopteridaceae Wood Fern Family Dryopteris arguta Coastal wood fern X Polystichum munitum Canyon sword fern X Polypodiaceae Polypody Family Polypodium californicum California polypody X Pteridaceae Lip Fern Family Pellaea andromedifolia Coffee fern X Pellaea mucronata Bird’s foot cliff-brake X Pentagramma triangularis ssp. triangularis California goldenback fern X Pteridium aquilinum var. pubescens Bracken fern X Selaginellaceae Spike-Moss Family Selaginella bigelovii Bigelow’s spike-moss X GYMNOSPERMAE CONE-BEARING PLANTS Cupressaceae Cypress Family *Caloedrus sp. Cedar X Pinaceae Pine Family *Abies spp. Fir X *Pinus spp. Pine X Pseudotsuga macrocarpa Big-cone Douglas-fir X ANGIOSPERMAE: DICOTYLEDONAE DICOT FLOWERING PLANTS Aceraceae Maple Family -
TURF REPLACEMENT PROGRAM MMWD LYL Approved Plant List
LANDSCAPE YOUR LAWN (LYL) TURF REPLACEMENT PROGRAM MMWD LYL Approved Plant List Attached is the current MMWD list of approved plants for the The values are obtained by determining the area of a circle using Landscape Your Lawn (LYL) Program. the plant spread or width as the diameter. To find the area of a circle, square the diameter and multiply by .7854. Squaring the This list is taken from the Water Use Classification of Landscape diameter means multiplying the diameter by itself. For example, a Species (WUCOLS IV) – a widely accepted and commonly used plant with a 5 foot spread would be calculated as follows: source of information on landscape plant water needs. Plants that .7854 x 5 ft diameter x 5 ft diameter = 20 sq ft (values are rounded are listed in WUCOLS IV as “low” or “very low” water use for the Bay to the nearest whole number). Area have been included on this list. However, plants that are considered invasive and are found on the MMWD Invasive Plant List For values not provided, please refer to reputable gardening books are not included in this list and will not be allowed for the LYL or nurseries in order to determine the diameter of the plant at program. maturity, or conduct an internet search using the botanical name and “mature size”. Any plants used in turf conversion that are not on this plant list will not count toward the 50 percent plant coverage requirement nor CA Natives will they be eligible for a rebate under LYL Option 1. Native plants are perfectly suited to our climate, soil, and animals. -
Biological Assessment Report
APPENDIX B: BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT REPORT Biological Assessment Report 3059 Passmore Drive (APN: 2427 007 017) Los Angeles, California Prepared for July 2018 Passmore Properties, LLC P.O. Box 260394 Encino, CA 91426 Biological Assessment Report 3059 Passmore Drive (APN: 2427 007 017) Los Angeles, California Prepared for July 2018 Passmore Properties, LLC P.O. Box 260394 Encino, CA 91426 2121 Alton Parkway Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92606 949.753.7001 www.esassoc.com Bend Oakland San Francisco Camarillo Orlando Santa Monica Delray Beach Pasadena Sarasota Destin Petaluma Seattle Irvine Portland Sunrise Los Angeles Sacramento Tampa Miami San Diego 180296 Table of Contents Biological Assessment Report 3059 Passmore Drive (APN: 2427 007 017) Los Angeles, California Page 1. Introduction..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Description .................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Project Location and Site Conditions ...................................................................... 1 2. Methods ........................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Literature Review .................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Biological Assessment ............................................................................................ 4 3. Results ............................................................................................................................