Fire and Deer Resistant Plant List Las Pilitas Nursery 2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fire and Deer Resistant Plant List Las Pilitas Nursery 2017 Fire and Deer Resistant Plant List Las Pilitas Nursery 2017 Genus/Species Common Name Deer Proof by# fire (burn times, in seconds/plant height, in meters, Deer Comments 10 usually safe to max 10) 1 totally nothing is 'safe" but some are best(>60,low and/or destroyed burns poorly), better(30, medium height, medium burn), or you should think about it(<1, high and flash) Abies bracteata Santa Lucia Fir 8 2,usually safe if no fire ladder present usually safe ​ ​ Acacia Greggii Catclaw 10 20, creates a lot of debris very thorny but even gallon stock not bothered Acer circinatum Vine Maple 7 5 Japanese Maple should be similar Acer macrophyllum Big Leaf Maple 8 6, flashy protect when young Acer negundo California Box 9 female 1.5, male more like 5 bothers only seedlings on Elder really bad years Achillea millefolium Yarrow 9 5, if regularly mowed 60 usually dormant when deer californica worst Adenostoma Chamise 6 15, yes, it's really not that bad they browse but don't fasciculatum destroy Adiantum jordanii 9 60(disappears in summer) Aesculus calif Buckeye 7 8 poisonous to all (but gophers & deer have eaten) Agave deserti Century Plant 8 600 on bad years they roll out new plants and eat bottom Agave utahensis Century Plant 10 600 " Alnus rhombifolia White Alder 2 1.5, ok if no fire ladder present water lover, eat the poo out ​ ​ of them on bad years Amelanchier Western Service 5 Great bird plant alnifolia Berry Amorpha californica False Indigo 10 smelly chaparral plant Aquilegia eximia Red Columbine 6 100+ unless you let the debris build up Pretty perennial Aquilegia formosa Western 6 100+ unless you let the debris build up Pretty perennial Columbine Aquilegia pubescens Sierra 6 100+ unless you let the debris build up Pretty perennial Columbine Aquilegia shockleyi Desert 6 100+ unless you let the debris build up Pretty perennial Columbine Arbutus Menziesii Madrone 9 4.5 Structure safe Arctostaphylos spp. Manzanitas 9 ( if native in are much more deer area) resistant in their native areas, gray ones more deer proof Arctostaphylos Brittleleaf 5 crustacea Manzanita Arctostaphylos 'Harmony' 4 60 Only eaten on bad years in densiflora some locales Arctostaphylos 'Howard 4 12 They will eat every leaf,but densiflora McMinn' no stems in bad areas Arctostaphylos 'Sentinel' 8 30 not bothered densiflora Arctostaphylos Sur Manzanita 7 300 very low plant Edmundsii Arctostaphylos 'Danville' 4 probably 100 Edmundsii Arctostaphylos Big Berry 9 5 They usually don't bother glauca Manzanita this Arctostaphylos 'Monterey 4 They will eat every leaf, but Hookeri Carpet' leave stems in bad areas Arctostaphylos 'Wayside' 4 120 They will eat every leaf, but Hookeri leave stems in bad areas Arctostaphylos 'Dr. Hurd' 9 3 They usually don't bother manzanita this Arctostaphylos Morro Bay 7 3 morroensis manzanita Arctostaphylos Pajaro 4 7 pajaroensis Manzanita Arctostaphylos Parry Manzanita 6 20 parryana Arctostaphylos La Panza 6 1 pilosula Manzanita Arctostaphylos Dune Manzanita 4 pumila Arctostaphylos Bear Berry 5 600 uva-ursi Point Reyes Arctostaphylos 'Emerald Carpet' 4 Arctostaphylos 'Greensphere' 4 4 Arctostaphylos 'Sunset' 4 60 Argemone munita Prickly Poppy 5 Armeria maritima Thrift 4 var. calif. Arnica Parryi Sonnei Frog flower 5 Artemisia californica California 5 60, do not allow debris to build up about September they (and Sagebrush the wabbits) eat the new plants to the ground Artemisia Sandhill Sage 4 pycnocephala Artemisia tridentata Big Basin 9 45 Sagebrush Asarum caudatum Wild Ginger 7 100+* Asclepias eriocarpa Monarch 9 60 Milkweed Asclepias speciosa Showy Milkweed 9 55 Aster adscendens Purple Aster 6 600 flat Atriplex lentiformis Brewers Salt 4 20 rabbits will eat until 3' tall Brewer Bush Atriplex canescens Fourwing 4 30 Saltbush Atriplex Desert Holly 5 600 hymenelytra Atriplex polycarpa Alkali Saltbrush 5 30 Baccharis pilularis "Pigeon Point "or 6 600 after first year browsing is 'Santa Ana' great! Keeps plant low, but first year they rip them out Baccharis pilularis Coyote Bush 9 8 consanguinea Beloperone Chuparosa 7 100+* californica Betula occidentalis River Birch 4 Brodiaea puchella Blue Dicks 8 off season with deer Calycanthus Spice Bush 9 30 ccidentalis Carpenteria Bush Anemone 7 25 californica Ceanothus species are relatively hard to burn and respond well to light overhead watering once every two weeks. A dust- off once every two weeks makes them really hard to burn. Water very much at all and the deer will eat. Ceanothus arboreus Island Mountain 2 3 they eat as high as they can Lilac reach Ceanothus cuneatus Buckbrush 9 15 Ceanothus foliosus Scented-leaf 8 Ceanothus gloriosus Hearts Desire 7 20 Ceanothus griseus Big Sur 1 Ceanothus Ceanothus griseus 'Louis Edmunds' 1 Ceanothus griseus Yankee Point 1 60 var. horizon Ceanothus Carpet Mountain 7 150 hearstiorum Lilac Ceanothus Santa Barbara 7 12 will eat new grow in bad impressus Ceanothus years, bucks can do a number on it with antlers Ceanothus Deer Brush 4 integerrimus Ceanothus Lemmon's 6 Lemmonii Ceanothus Ceanothus Whitebark 7 leucodermis Ceanothus Ceanothus 'L.T. Blue' 8 20 Ceanothus Maritime 8 300 nearly flat maritimus Ceanothus Ceanothus Bigpod 8 40 megacarpus Ceanothus Ceanothus Wartleaf 8 papillosus Ceanothus Ceanothus Squaw Carpet 8 600 prostratus Ceanothus 'Mills Glory' 10 30 one of the most deer proof purpureus plants we have seen Ceanothus Jim Bush 7 15 sorediatus Ceanothus Blue Blossom 5 20 thyrsiflorus Ceanothus Romona Lilac 8 tomentosus olivaceus Ceanothus Wartystem 8 38 verrucosus Ceanothus Ceanothus 'Blue Jeans' 10 30 Ceanothus 'Concha' 7 30 will eat new growth in bad years Ceanothus 'Dark Star' 8 Ceanothus gloriosus 'Emily Brown' 9 exaltatus Ceanothus gloriosus 9 600 ​ porrectus Ceanothus 'Frosty Blue' 7 10 Ceanothus 'Joyce Coulter' 7 60 Ceanothus 'Julia Phelps' 8 30 Ceanothus 'Mountain Haze' 7 30 Ceanothus 'Ray Hartman' 2 20 Ceanothus cyaneus 'Sierra Blue' 2 5 Ceanothus rigidus 'Snowball' 10 60 Celtis reticulata Hackberry 8 Cephalanthus Buttonwillow 7 15 occidentalis californica Cercidium floridium Palo Verde 5 15 Cercidium Little Leaf Horse 5 15 microphyllum Bean Cercis occidentalis Western Redbud 7 15 Cercocarpus Alder Leaf 1 15 alnifolius Mountain Mahogany Cercocarpus Mountain 3 15 betuloides Mahogany Cercocarpus Desert Mountain 6 ledifolius Mahogany Chilopsis linearis Desert Willow 7 10 Chlorogalum Soap Plant 7 5 flower stalks are tasty for pomeridianum deer Clematis Virgin's Bower 7 10 ligusticifolia Clematis lasiantha Virgin's Bower 7 10 Comarostaphylis Summer Holly 6 1.5 diversifolia Cornus glabrata Brown Stem 7 5 Dogwood Cornus Nuttallii Mountain 6 Dogwood Cornus sessilis Forest Dogwood 6 Cornus stolonifera Redtwig 6 2 Dogwood Cowania mexicana Cliff Rose 5 stansburiana Crossosoma Crabapple bush 5 californicum Cupressus Bakeri Modoc Cypress 10 Cupressus Forbesii Tecate Cypress 10 8 Cupressus Gowen Cypress 10 Goveniana ssp. goveniana Cupressus McNab Cypress 10 macnabiana Cupressus Piute Cypress 10 4 nevadensis Cupressus Sargentii Sargent Cypress 10 Delphinium Scarlet Larkspur 9 cardinale Delphinium Parishii Sky-Blue 9 Larkspur Dendromecon rigida Bush Poppy 5 20 Dicentra chrysantha Golden Ear 8 Drops Diplacus Sticky Monkey 9 60 aurantiacus Flower Diplacus Azalea-flowered 8 1 not favorites but will eat fasciculatus monkey Diplacus longiflorus Southern 8 90 Monkey Flower Diplacus calycinus Rock Monkey 8 Flower Diplacus puniceus Mission Monkey 8 6 Hygine and a little water Flower dramtically helps the numbers on monkeys. Dodecatheon Shooting Star 4 Clevelandii Dodecatheon 4 Clevelandii var. insulare Draba oligosperma Yellow Flowered 9 Moss Dudleya cymosa Liveforever 7(ducks love) Dudleya edulis Narrow Leaf 7(ducks love) Liveforever Dudleya lanceolata Liveforever 6 600 Dudleya Chalk Dudleya 8 600 pulverulenta Dyssodia thurberi Dainty Yellow 8 Composite Encelia farinosa Incienso 5 60 Erigeron glaucus Seaside Daisy 7 300 Eriodictyon Yerba Santa 8 20 californicum Eriodictyon Wooly Yerba 8 20 tomentosum Santa Eriogonum Santa Cruz 3 60 arborescens Island Buckwheat Eriogonum Silver Buckwheat 3 caespitosum Eriogonum Ash-Leaf 3 cinereum Buckwheat Eriogonum Dry Mountain 4 compositum Buckwheat Eriogonum Saffron 4 crocatum Buckwheat Eriogonum California 6 60 fasciculatum Buckwheat Eriogonum Gray Calif. Buck 6 60 fasciculatum polifolium Eriogonum Saint Catherine's 6 60 The fire numbers suprised giganteum Lace us also. Eriogonum grande Red Buckwheat 5 180 rubescens Eriogonum Sulfur Flower 5 100 umbellatum Eriogonum Wrightii High Mountain 5 300 var. subscaposum Eriophyllum Golden Yarrow 6 4 confertiflorum Eriophyllum Spider Yarrow 6 lanatum var. arachnoideum Erysimum Scented 5 concinnum Wallflower Erysimum menziesii Menzes's 5 Wallflower Fallugia paradoxa Apache Plume 5 30 Ferocactus Barrel Cactus 7 9 on bad years they will eat acanthodes from bottom up, thorns burn like small twigs Forestiera Desrt Olive 5 neomexicana Fragaria californica Wood 9 600 Strawberry Fragaria chiloensis Beach 9 600 Strawberry Fraxinus dipetala Flowering Ash 7 2 Fremontodendron California 4 15 californicum Flannel Bush Fremontodendron 4 1 Hybrid (PACIFIC SUNSET) Fremontodendron Mexican Flannel 7 mexicanum Galvezia speciosa Island 1 Snapdragon Garrya elliptica 'James Roof' 7 4 SilkTassel Haplopappus Narrowleaf 7 linearifolius Golden Bush Helenium hoopsii Owlclaws 7 500 Heteromeles Toyon 7 12 arbutifolia Heuchera micrantha Alum Root 8 Heuchera Hairy Alum Root 8 pilosissima Heuchera rubescens Dwarf Alum 8 var. glandulosa Holodiscus discolor Cream Bush 6 Hyptis Emoryi Desert-Lavender 7 Iris Douglasiana
Recommended publications
  • The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks Bioblitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks BioBlitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event Natural Resource Report NPS/GOGA/NRR—2016/1147 ON THIS PAGE Photograph of BioBlitz participants conducting data entry into iNaturalist. Photograph courtesy of the National Park Service. ON THE COVER Photograph of BioBlitz participants collecting aquatic species data in the Presidio of San Francisco. Photograph courtesy of National Park Service. The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks BioBlitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event Natural Resource Report NPS/GOGA/NRR—2016/1147 Elizabeth Edson1, Michelle O’Herron1, Alison Forrestel2, Daniel George3 1Golden Gate Parks Conservancy Building 201 Fort Mason San Francisco, CA 94129 2National Park Service. Golden Gate National Recreation Area Fort Cronkhite, Bldg. 1061 Sausalito, CA 94965 3National Park Service. San Francisco Bay Area Network Inventory & Monitoring Program Manager Fort Cronkhite, Bldg. 1063 Sausalito, CA 94965 March 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Plum Crazy: Rediscovering Our Lost Prunus Resources W.R
    Plum Crazy: Rediscovering Our Lost Prunus Resources W.R. Okie1 U.S. Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service, Southeastern Fruit and Tree Nut Research Laboratory, 21 Dunbar Road, Byron, GA 31008 Recent utilization of genetic resources of peach [Prunus persica (‘Quetta’ from India, ‘John Rivers’ from England, and ‘Lippiatts’ (L.) Batsch] and Japanese plum (P. salicina Lindl. and hybrids) has from New Zealand) were critical to the development of modern been limited in the United States compared with that of many crops. nectarines in California (Taylor, 1959). However, most fresh-market Difficulties in collection, importation, and quarantine throughput have peach breeding programs in the United States have used germplasm limited the germplasm available. Prunus is more difficult to preserve developed in the United States for cultivar development (Okie, 1998). because more space is needed than for small fruit crops, and the shorter Only in New Jersey was there extensive hybridization with imported life of trees relative to other tree crops because of disease and insect clones, and most of these hybrids have not resulted in named cultivars problems. Lack of suitable rootstocks has also reduced tree life. The (Blake and Edgerton, 1946). trend toward fewer breeding programs, most of which emphasize In recent years, interest in collecting and utilizing novel germplasm “short-term” (long-term compared to most crops) commercial cultivar has increased. For example, non-melting clingstone peaches from development to meet immediate industry needs, has also contributed Mexico and Brazil have been used in the joint USDA–Univ. of to reduced use of exotic material. Georgia–Univ. of Florida breeding program for the development of Probably all modern commercial peaches grown in the United early ripening, non-melting, fresh-market peaches for low-chill areas States are related to ‘Chinese Cling’, a peach imported from China (Beckman and Sherman, 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Qty Size Name 6 1G Abies Bracteata 10 1G Abutilon Palmeri 1 1G Acaena Pinnatifida Var
    REGIONAL PARKS BOTANIC GARDEN, TILDEN REGIONAL PARK, BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA Celebrating 76 years of growing California native plants: 1940-2016 **FINAL**PLANT SALE LIST **FINAL** (9/30/2016 @ 6:00 PM) visit: www.nativeplants.org for the most up to date plant list FALL PLANT SALE OF CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANTS SATURDAY, OCTOBER 1, 2016 PUBLIC SALE: 10:00 AM TO 3:00 PM MEMBERS ONLY SALE: 9:00 AM TO 10:00 AM MEMBERSHIPS ARE AVAILABLE AT THE ENTRY TO THE SALE AT 8:30 AM Qty Size Name 6 1G Abies bracteata 10 1G Abutilon palmeri 1 1G Acaena pinnatifida var. californica 18 1G Achillea millefolium 10 4" Achillea millefolium - Black Butte 28 4" Achillea millefolium 'Island Pink' 8 4" Achillea millefolium 'Rosy Red' - donated by Annie's Annuals 2 4" Achillea millefolium 'Sonoma Coast' 7 4" Acmispon (Lotus) argophyllus var. argenteus 9 1G Actea rubra f. neglecta (white fruits) 25 4" Adiantum x tracyi (A. jordanii x A. aleuticum) 5 1G Aesculus californica 1 2G Agave shawii var. shawii 2 1G Agoseris grandiflora 8 1G Alnus incana var. tenuifolia 2 2G Alnus incana var. tenuifolia 5 4" Ambrosia pumila 5 1G Amelanchier alnifolia var. semiintegrifolia 9 1G Anemopsis californica 5 1G Angelica hendersonii 3 1G Angelica tomentosa 1 1G Apocynum androsaemifolium x Apocynum cannabinum 7 1G Apocynum cannabinum 5 1G Aquilegia formosa 2 4" Aquilegia formosa 4 4" Arbutus menziesii 2 1G Arctostaphylos andersonii 2 1G Arctostaphylos auriculata 3 1G Arctostaphylos 'Austin Griffith' 11 1G Arctostaphylos bakeri 5 1G Arctostaphylos bakeri 'Louis Edmunds' 2 1G Arctostaphylos canescens 2 1G Arctostaphylos canescens subsp.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plants at Fort Ross State Historic Park
    19005 Coast Highway One, Jenner, CA 95450 ■ 707.847.3437 ■ [email protected] ■ www.fortross.org Title: Vascular Plants at Fort Ross State Historic Park Author(s): Dorothy Scherer Published by: California Native Plant Society i Source: Fort Ross Conservancy Library URL: www.fortross.org Fort Ross Conservancy (FRC) asks that you acknowledge FRC as the source of the content; if you use material from FRC online, we request that you link directly to the URL provided. If you use the content offline, we ask that you credit the source as follows: “Courtesy of Fort Ross Conservancy, www.fortross.org.” Fort Ross Conservancy, a 501(c)(3) and California State Park cooperating association, connects people to the history and beauty of Fort Ross and Salt Point State Parks. © Fort Ross Conservancy, 19005 Coast Highway One, Jenner, CA 95450, 707-847-3437 .~ ) VASCULAR PLANTS of FORT ROSS STATE HISTORIC PARK SONOMA COUNTY A PLANT COMMUNITIES PROJECT DOROTHY KING YOUNG CHAPTER CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY DOROTHY SCHERER, CHAIRPERSON DECEMBER 30, 1999 ) Vascular Plants of Fort Ross State Historic Park August 18, 2000 Family Botanical Name Common Name Plant Habitat Listed/ Community Comments Ferns & Fern Allies: Azollaceae/Mosquito Fern Azo/la filiculoides Mosquito Fern wp Blechnaceae/Deer Fern Blechnum spicant Deer Fern RV mp,sp Woodwardia fimbriata Giant Chain Fern RV wp Oennstaedtiaceae/Bracken Fern Pleridium aquilinum var. pubescens Bracken, Brake CG,CC,CF mh T Oryopteridaceae/Wood Fern Athyrium filix-femina var. cyclosorum Western lady Fern RV sp,wp Dryopteris arguta Coastal Wood Fern OS op,st Dryopteris expansa Spreading Wood Fern RV sp,wp Polystichum munitum Western Sword Fern CF mh,mp Equisetaceae/Horsetail Equisetum arvense Common Horsetail RV ds,mp Equisetum hyemale ssp.affine Common Scouring Rush RV mp,sg Equisetum laevigatum Smooth Scouring Rush mp,sg Equisetum telmateia ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • Piedra Blanca Trail Middle Sespe Creek/Pine Mountain Ridge, Ventura County, California by David L
    Vascular Plants of the Piedra Blanca Trail Middle Sespe Creek/Pine Mountain Ridge, Ventura County, California By David L. Magney Botanical Name Common Name Habit Family Acer macrophyllum Bigleaf Maple T Sapindaceae Acmispon ? Lotus AH Fabaceae Acmispon glaber var. glaber Deerweed S Fabaceae Acmispon strigosus var. strigosus Strigose Lotus AH Fabaceae Acourtia microcephala Sacapellote PH Asteraceae Adenostoma fasciculatum Chamise S Rosaceae Agoseris ? Mountain Dandelion PH Asteraceae Alnus rhombifolia White Alder T Betulaceae Amorpha californica False Indigo S Fabaceae Antirrhinum multiflorum Sticky Snapdragon S Veronicaceae Aquilegia formosa Columbine PH Ranunculaceae Arctostaphylos glauca Bigberry Manzanita S Ericaceae Artemisia douglasiana Mugwort S Asteraceae Artemisia tridentata ssp. tridentata Great Basin Sagebrush S Asteraceae Asclepias eriocarpa Woolly Milkweed AH Apocynaceae Astragalus ? Milkvetch AH Fabaceae Avena barbata* Slender Wild Oat AG Poaceae Baccharis salicifolia Mulefat S Asteraceae Boechera arcuata Few-flowered Rock Cress PH Brassicaceae Brickellia californica California Brickellbush S Asteraceae Bromus ? Brome PG Poaceae Bromus madritensis ssp. rubens* Red Brome AG Poaceae Bromus tectorum var. tectorum* Downy Brome AG Poaceae Calocedrus decurrens Incense-cedar T Cupressaceae Calyptridium monandrum Common Calyptridium AH Montiaceae Calystegia malacophylla ssp. cf pedicellata Sierra Morning-glory PH Convolvulaceae Camissonia boothii ssp. decorticans Shreading Evening Primrose AH Onagraceae Camissonia campestris ssp. campestris? Mojave Sun-cup AH Onagraceae Camissoniopsis micrantha Tiny Primrose AH Onagraceae Camissoniopsis pallida ssp. pallida Pale Primrose AH Onagraceae Carex ? Sedge PG Cyperaceae Carex senta Rough Sedge PG Cyperaceae Castilleja ? Indian Paintbrush PH Orobanchaceae Castilleja affinis ssp. affinis Lay-and-Collie's Indian Paintbrush PH Orobanchaceae Castilleja foliolosa Woolly Indian Paintbrush PH Orobanchaceae Castilleja subinclusa ssp. subinclusa Long-leaved Indian Paintbrush PH Orobanchaceae Caulanthus coulteri var.
    [Show full text]
  • Botany Biological Evaluation
    APPENDIX I Botany Biological Evaluation Biological Evaluation for Threatened, Endangered and Sensitive Plants and Fungi Page 1 of 35 for the Upper Truckee River Sunset Stables Restoration Project November 2009 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE – FOREST SERVICE LAKE TAHOE BASIN MANAGEMENT UNIT Upper Truckee River Sunset Stables Restoration Project El Dorado County, CA Biological Evaluation for Threatened, Endangered and Sensitive Plants and Fungi PREPARED BY: ENTRIX, Inc. DATE: November 2009 APPROVED BY: DATE: _____________ Name, Forest Botanist, Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit SUMMARY OF EFFECTS DETERMINATION AND MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS AND/OR REQUIREMENTS One population of a special-status bryophyte, three-ranked hump-moss (Meesia triquetra), was observed in the survey area during surveys on June 30, 2008 and August 28, 2008. The proposed action will not affect the moss because the population is located outside the project area where no action is planned. The following species of invasive or noxious weeds were identified during surveys of the Project area: cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum); bullthistle (Cirsium vulgare); Klamathweed (Hypericum perforatum); oxe-eye daisy (Leucanthemum vulgare); and common mullein (Verbascum Thapsus). The threat posed by these weed populations would not increase if the proposed action is implemented. An inventory and assessment of invasive and noxious weeds in the survey area is presented in the Noxious Weed Risk Assessment for the Upper Truckee River Sunset Stables Restoration Project (ENTRIX 2009). Based on the description of the proposed action and the evaluation contained herein, we have determined the following: There would be no significant effect to plant species listed as threatened, endangered, proposed for listing, or candidates under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA), administered by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Stuart, Trees & Shrubs
    Excerpted from ©2001 by the Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. May not be copied or reused without express written permission of the publisher. click here to BUY THIS BOOK INTRODUCTION HOW THE BOOK IS ORGANIZED Conifers and broadleaved trees and shrubs are treated separately in this book. Each group has its own set of keys to genera and species, as well as plant descriptions. Plant descriptions are or- ganized alphabetically by genus and then by species. In a few cases, we have included separate subspecies or varieties. Gen- era in which we include more than one species have short generic descriptions and species keys. Detailed species descrip- tions follow the generic descriptions. A species description in- cludes growth habit, distinctive characteristics, habitat, range (including a map), and remarks. Most species descriptions have an illustration showing leaves and either cones, flowers, or fruits. Illustrations were drawn from fresh specimens with the intent of showing diagnostic characteristics. Plant rarity is based on rankings derived from the California Native Plant Society and federal and state lists (Skinner and Pavlik 1994). Two lists are presented in the appendixes. The first is a list of species grouped by distinctive morphological features. The second is a checklist of trees and shrubs indexed alphabetically by family, genus, species, and common name. CLASSIFICATION To classify is a natural human trait. It is our nature to place ob- jects into similar groups and to place those groups into a hier- 1 TABLE 1 CLASSIFICATION HIERARCHY OF A CONIFER AND A BROADLEAVED TREE Taxonomic rank Conifer Broadleaved tree Kingdom Plantae Plantae Division Pinophyta Magnoliophyta Class Pinopsida Magnoliopsida Order Pinales Sapindales Family Pinaceae Aceraceae Genus Abies Acer Species epithet magnifica glabrum Variety shastensis torreyi Common name Shasta red fir mountain maple archy.
    [Show full text]
  • Qty Size Name Price 10 1G Abies Bracteata 12.00 $ 15 1G Abutilon
    REGIONAL PARKS BOTANIC GARDEN, TILDEN REGIONAL PARK, BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA Celebrating 78 years of growing California native plants: 1940-2018 **PRELIMINARY**PLANT SALE LIST **PRELIMINARY** Preliminary Plant Sale List 9/29/2018 visit: www.nativeplants.org for the most up to date plant list, updates are posted until 10/5 FALL PLANT SALE OF CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANTS SATURDAY, October 6, 2018 PUBLIC SALE: 10:00 AM TO 3:00 PM MEMBERS ONLY SALE: 9:00 AM TO 10:00 AM MEMBERSHIPS ARE AVAILABLE AT THE ENTRY TO THE SALE AT 8:30 AM Qty Size Name Price 10 1G Abies bracteata $ 12.00 15 1G Abutilon palmeri $ 11.00 1 1G Acer circinatum $ 10.00 3 5G Acer circinatum $ 40.00 8 1G Acer macrophyllum $ 9.00 10 1G Achillea millefolium 'Calistoga' $ 8.00 25 4" Achillea millefolium 'Island Pink' OUR INTRODUCTION! $ 5.00 28 1G Achillea millefolium 'Island Pink' OUR INTRODUCTION! $ 8.00 6 1G Actea rubra f. neglecta (white fruits) $ 9.00 3 1G Adenostoma fasciculatum $ 10.00 1 4" Adiantum aleuticum $ 10.00 6 1G Adiantum aleuticum $ 13.00 10 4" Adiantum shastense $ 10.00 4 1G Adiantum x tracyi $ 13.00 2 2G Aesculus californica $ 12.00 1 4" Agave shawii var. shawii $ 8.00 1 1G Agave shawii var. shawii $ 15.00 4 1G Allium eurotophilum $ 10.00 3 1G Alnus incana var. tenuifolia $ 8.00 4 1G Amelanchier alnifolia var. semiintegrifolia $ 9.00 8 2" Anemone drummondii var. drummondii $ 4.00 9 1G Anemopsis californica $ 9.00 8 1G Apocynum cannabinum $ 8.00 2 1G Aquilegia eximia $ 8.00 15 4" Aquilegia formosa $ 6.00 11 1G Aquilegia formosa $ 8.00 10 1G Aquilegia formosa 'Nana' $ 8.00 Arabis - see Boechera 5 1G Arctostaphylos auriculata $ 11.00 2 1G Arctostaphylos auriculata - large inflorescences from Black Diamond $ 11.00 1 1G Arctostaphylos bakeri $ 11.00 15 1G Arctostaphylos bakeri 'Louis Edmunds' $ 11.00 2 1G Arctostaphylos canescens subsp.
    [Show full text]
  • Life History Type and Water Stress Tolerance in Nine California Chaparral Species (Rhamnaceae)
    Ecological Monographs, 77(2), 2007, pp. 239–253 Ó 2007 by the Ecological Society of America LIFE HISTORY TYPE AND WATER STRESS TOLERANCE IN NINE CALIFORNIA CHAPARRAL SPECIES (RHAMNACEAE) 1,5 2 3 4 2 3 R. B. PRATT, A. L. JACOBSEN, K. A. GOLGOTIU, J. S. SPERRY, F. W. EWERS, AND S. D. DAVIS 1Department of Biology, California State University, Bakersfield, 9001 Stockdale Highway, Bakersfield, California 93311 USA 2Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824 USA 3Natural Science Division, Pepperdine University, Malibu, California 90263 USA 4University of Utah, Department of Biology, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 USA Abstract. Chaparral species of California, USA, exhibit three life history types in response to fire: non-sprouters (NS), facultative sprouters (FS), and obligate sprouters (OS). Adult non-sprouters are killed by fire; thus populations reestablish only through fire- stimulated seed germination and seedling recruitment. Facultative sprouters reestablish by both vegetative sprouting and seed germination. Obligate sprouters reestablish only by vegetative sprouting and do not recruit seedlings post-fire. Previous data suggest that post-fire NS and FS seedlings reestablish as open-canopy gap specialists, whereas OS seedlings primarily reestablish in deep shade during fire-free intervals. Their non-refractory seeds are killed by fire. We hypothesized that these differences in life history, compared within the same taxonomic group, would result in a range of relative resistance to water stress such that NS . FS . OS. To test our hypothesis, we estimated resistance to water stress using resistance to xylem cavitation (the water potential at 50% loss in hydraulic conductivity; W50) for stems and roots in nine species of the family Rhamnaceae: Ceanothus megacarpus, C.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Ecological Classifications
    INTERNATIONAL ECOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION STANDARD: TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATIONS Alliances and Groups of the Central Basin and Range Ecoregion Appendix Accompanying Report and Field Keys for the Central Basin and Range Ecoregion: NatureServe_2017_NVC Field Keys and Report_Nov_2017_CBR.pdf 1 December 2017 by NatureServe 600 North Fairfax Drive, 7th Floor Arlington, VA 22203 1680 38th St., Suite 120 Boulder, CO 80301 This subset of the International Ecological Classification Standard covers vegetation alliances and groups of the Central Basin and Range Ecoregion. This classification has been developed in consultation with many individuals and agencies and incorporates information from a variety of publications and other classifications. Comments and suggestions regarding the contents of this subset should be directed to Mary J. Russo, Central Ecology Data Manager, NC <[email protected]> and Marion Reid, Senior Regional Ecologist, Boulder, CO <[email protected]>. Copyright © 2017 NatureServe, 4600 North Fairfax Drive, 7th floor Arlington, VA 22203, U.S.A. All Rights Reserved. Citations: The following citation should be used in any published materials which reference ecological system and/or International Vegetation Classification (IVC hierarchy) and association data: NatureServe. 2017. International Ecological Classification Standard: Terrestrial Ecological Classifications. NatureServe Central Databases. Arlington, VA. U.S.A. Data current as of 1 December 2017. Restrictions on Use: Permission to use, copy and distribute these data is hereby granted under the following conditions: 1. The above copyright notice must appear in all documents and reports; 2. Any use must be for informational purposes only and in no instance for commercial purposes; 3. Some data may be altered in format for analytical purposes, however the data should still be referenced using the citation above.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoring Western Ranges and Wildlands
    United States Department of Agriculture Restoring Western Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station General Technical Ranges and Wildlands Report RMRS-GTR-136-vol. 3 September 2004 Volume 3 Chapters 24–29, Appendices, Index Abstract ______________________________________ Monsen, Stephen B.; Stevens, Richard; Shaw, Nancy L., comps. 2004. Restoring western ranges and wildlands. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-136-vol-3. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. Pages 699– 884 plus appendices and index. This work, in three volumes, provides background on philosophy, processes, plant materials selection, site preparation, and seed and seeding equipment for revegetating disturbed rangelands, emphasizing use of native species. The 29 chapters include guidelines for planning, conducting, and managing, and contain a compilation of rangeland revegetation research conducted over the last several decades to aid practitioners in reestablishing healthy communities and curbing the spread of invasive species. Volume 3 contains chapters 24-29 plus appendices and index. Keywords: rehabilitation, revegetation, plant ecology, seed, plant communities, wildlife habitat, invasive species, equipment, plant materials, native plants A B A—Hand-harvesting grass seed. B—Certification tag. C—Native plant propagation in greenhouse. D—Brush machine. E—Flail-vac harvesting needle-and thread grass. Restoring Western Ranges and Wildlands Compilers Stephen B. Monsen Volume 3 Richard Stevens Nancy L. Shaw Chapters 24–29, Appendices, Index D C E i The Compilers _____________________________________ Stephen B. Monsen (retired), Botanist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Shrub Sciences Laboratory, Provo, Utah Richard Stevens, Project Leader (retired), Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, Great Basin Research Center, Ephraim, Utah Nancy L.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 4.3.1 Existing Conditions Methodology
    4.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 4.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES This section identifies biological resources present on the project site and assesses the project’s impacts upon those resources. It is based on previous biological resource assessments for the site (conducted for the applicant) and a review of those assessments and supplemental field surveys and research conducted by the City’s EIR consultant. Since the Notice of Preparation was published March 9, 2010, the applicant has undertaken minimal amount of site disturbance activity for environmental research and maintenance. These activities involved conducting cultural resources investigations in March 2011, fuel maintenance as required by the County Fire Department in May 2011, and geotechnical exploration of the project site to assess possible construction design (i.e. foundation designs) on June 13-15, 2011. Each of these activities was planned and monitored to avoid any significant biological resources. Fuel modification is conducted on an ongoing basis once every three months. 4.3.1 Existing Conditions This section discusses the regional setting, project site conditions, and the existing and potentially occurring biological resources at the project site. Biological resources within the surrounding area are also discussed, when relevant. Methodology The description of existing conditions provided below is based on a literature review and site surveys. Literature Review The literature review included previous site-specific and non site-specific studies and California Department of Fish and
    [Show full text]