DOCSLIB.ORG

Biological Assessment Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Biological Assessment Report APPENDIX B: BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT REPORT Biological Assessment Report 3059 Passmore Drive (APN: 2427 007 017) Los Angeles, California Prepared for July 2018 Passmore Properties, LLC P.O. Box 260394 Encino, CA 91426 Biological Assessment Report 3059 Passmore Drive (APN: 2427 007 017) Los Angeles, California Prepared for July 2018 Passmore Properties, LLC P.O. Box 260394 Encino, CA 91426 2121 Alton Parkway Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92606 949.753.7001 www.esassoc.com Bend Oakland San Francisco Camarillo Orlando Santa Monica Delray Beach Pasadena Sarasota Destin Petaluma Seattle Irvine Portland Sunrise Los Angeles Sacramento Tampa Miami San Diego 180296 Table of Contents Biological Assessment Report 3059 Passmore Drive (APN: 2427 007 017) Los Angeles, California Page 1. Introduction..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Description .................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Project Location and Site Conditions ...................................................................... 1 2. Methods ........................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Literature Review .................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Biological Assessment ............................................................................................ 4 3. Results ............................................................................................................................. 5 3.1 Topography and Soils ............................................................................................. 5 3.2 Micro Climate and Wildfire ...................................................................................... 6 3.3 Plant Communities and Habitats ............................................................................ 8 3.4 Wildlife ................................................................................................................... 11 3.5 Special-Status Plants ............................................................................................ 16 3.6 Protected Trees ..................................................................................................... 20 3.7 Migration Corridors................................................................................................ 20 3.8 Jurisdictional Resources ....................................................................................... 20 3.9 CDFW Sensitive Natural Communities and Habitats ........................................... 20 4. Regulatory Setting ....................................................................................................... 20 4.1 Federal and State Endangered Species Acts ....................................................... 21 4.2 Migratory Bird Treaty Act ...................................................................................... 21 4.3 Clean Water Act .................................................................................................... 21 4.4 Native Plant Protection Act ................................................................................... 22 4.5 Section 15380 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines ............... 22 4.6 Sections 3503 and 3513 of the California Fish and Game Code ......................... 22 4.7 Section 1602 of the California Fish and Game Code ........................................... 23 5. Conclusions .................................................................................................................. 23 5.1 Special Status Plants and Wildlife ........................................................................ 23 5.2 Protected Trees ..................................................................................................... 24 5.3 Migration Corridors................................................................................................ 24 5.4 Jurisdictional Resources ....................................................................................... 24 5.5 CDFW Sensitive Natural Communities and Habitats ........................................... 24 6. Recommendations ....................................................................................................... 24 6.1 Nesting Birds ......................................................................................................... 24 6.2 Special-Status Wildlife .......................................................................................... 24 6.3 Protected Trees ..................................................................................................... 26 6.4 Wildlife Movement ................................................................................................. 26 7. References .................................................................................................................... 27 3059 Passmore Drive (APN: 2427 007 017) i ESA / 180582.01 Biological Assessment Report July 2018 Appendices A. Floral and Faunal Compendia B. Photographic Log C. CNDDB and CNPS Search Results Page Figures Figure 1 Regional Location ...................................................................................................... 2 Figure 2 Project Location ......................................................................................................... 3 Figure 3 Soils ............................................................................................................................ 7 Figure 4 Plant Communities and Land Uses ........................................................................... 9 Figure 5 Project Impacts......................................................................................................... 19 Tables Table 1 Plant Communities and Land Uses .............................................................................. 8 Table 2 Potentially Occurring Special-Status Wildlife Species Within Study Area ................. 13 Table 3 Potentially Occurring Special-Status Plant Species Within Study Area .................... 17 3059 Passmore Drive (APN: 2427 007 017) ii ESA / 180582.01 Biological Assessment Report July2018 Biological Assessment Report 3059 Passmore Drive (APN: 2427 007 017) 1. Introduction 1.1 Project Description This report documents the findings of a Biological Assessment prepared following a site reconnaissance. The proposed project will include the construction of a single-family residence located in the City of Los Angeles, California (project site). The residential construction will take place within the project site, however, some infrastructure such as retaining walls or driveway will extend offsite (development footprint). The project site, development footprint and a 200- foot buffer (study area) was assessed for sensitive biological resources during the site visit. This report provides an overview of the existing conditions documented within the study area, including conclusions and recommendations for avoiding impact to sensitive resources. 1.2 Project Location and Site Conditions The project site is located in the Mulholland Scenic Parkway Specific Plan of the Santa Monica Mountains, within the City of Los Angeles, California (Figure 1 - Regional Location). More specifically, the 0.39-acre project site is located west of Passmore Drive with adjacent residential properties (APN 2427-007-014, -013, -012) to the north and (APN 2427-007-016, 010) to the east and open space property (APN 2427-006-904) to the south and west (Figure 2 - Project Location). Mulholland Drive is located 1.0 mile to the southwest, the City of Burbank is located approximately 2 miles to the northeast, and the City of Beverly Hills is located approximately 6 miles to the southwest. U.S. Route 101 is located less than 1.0 mile to the north. Signs of historic vegetation removal was apparent within the project site and study area. Previous disturbances have resulted in the fragmentation of native tree and scrub vegetation resulting in a concentration of non-native vegetation and developed land uses including neighboring single- family residences. The study area is surrounded by residential development on the north and east, while the west and south borders abut with the approximately 17-acre Cahuenga Pass Open Space property, through which the project driveway passes within an egress-ingress easement. Access to the project site originates from Beckman Road to the south. 3059 Passmore Drive (APN: 2427 007 017) 1 ESA / 180582.01 Biological Assessment Report July 2018 S Path: U:\GIS\GIS\Projects\18xxxx\D180582_PassmoreDr\03_MXDs_Projects\Bio_Report\Fig1_RegionalLocation.mxd, sgeissler 7/20/2018 O U R L O C S C E O A : N U E N G S T E R Y L I E S A D r e e a t a o i l f N 0 M i l e L P s O R C O A J T E I C O 8 T N Ø ^ ! R e 3 g 0 5 i o 9 n P a a s l s F L m i o g o c r u e a r D t e i r o i v n 1 e Project Site 8 1 0 2 / 0 2 / 7 r e l s s i e g s , d x m . n o i t a c o L t c e j o r P _ 2 g i F \ t r o p e R _ o i B \ s t c e j o r P _ s D X M _ 3 0 \ r D e r o m s s a P _ 2 8 5 0 8 1 D \ x x x x 8 1 \ s t Study Area c e j o r P \ Project Site S I G \ S I Development Footprint G 0 200 \ : U : N h Fuel Modification Zone t Feet a P SOURCE: ESRI. 3059 Passmore Drive Figure 2 Project Location 2. Methods 2.1 Literature Review Prior to conducting the field assessment, ESA conducted a
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Phylogenetic Models Linking Speciation and Extinction to Chromosome and Mating System Evolution
    Phylogenetic Models Linking Speciation and Extinction to Chromosome and Mating System Evolution by William Allen Freyman A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Integrative Biology and the Designated Emphasis in Computational and Genomic Biology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Dr. Bruce G. Baldwin, Chair Dr. John P. Huelsenbeck Dr. Brent D. Mishler Dr. Kipling W. Will Fall 2017 Phylogenetic Models Linking Speciation and Extinction to Chromosome and Mating System Evolution Copyright 2017 by William Allen Freyman Abstract Phylogenetic Models Linking Speciation and Extinction to Chromosome and Mating System Evolution by William Allen Freyman Doctor of Philosophy in Integrative Biology and the Designated Emphasis in Computational and Genomic Biology University of California, Berkeley Dr. Bruce G. Baldwin, Chair Key evolutionary transitions have shaped the tree of life by driving the processes of spe- ciation and extinction. This dissertation aims to advance statistical and computational ap- proaches that model the timing and nature of these transitions over evolutionary trees. These methodological developments in phylogenetic comparative biology enable formal, model- based, statistical examinations of the macroevolutionary consequences of trait evolution. Chapter 1 presents computational tools for data mining the large-scale molecular sequence datasets needed for comparative phylogenetic analyses. I describe a novel metric, the miss- ing sequence decisiveness score (MSDS), which assesses the phylogenetic decisiveness of a matrix given the pattern of missing sequence data. In Chapter 2, I introduce a class of phylogenetic models of chromosome number evolution that accommodate both anagenetic and cladogenetic change.
    [Show full text]
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • A General Idea About Phytomelanin Layer in Some
    Indian Journal of Plant Sciences ISSN: 2319-3824 (Online) An Online International Journal Available at http://www.cibtech.org/jps.htm 2013 Vol. 2 (4) October-December, pp.44-48/Jana and Mukherjee Review Article A GENERAL IDEA ABOUT PHYTOMELANIN LAYER IN SOME COMPOSITAE *Jana Bidyut Kumar and Mukherjee Sobhan Kumar Taxonomy and Biosystematics Laboratory, Department of Botany, University of Kalyani, Kalyani- 741235, Nadia, West Bengal, India *Author for Correspondence ABSTRACT The present paper deals with the general idea about the phytomelanin layer, on the surface of cypsela of some Compositae, with the help of both compound light microscope and scanning electrone microscope. Phytomelanin layer is made up of hard, black, water resistant resinous or tanniniferous or polyvinyl alcohol containing disputed substance, usually found in the cypselar wall of some members of the family Compositae belonging to the tribes-Coreopsideae, Helenieae, Heliantheae, Eupatorieae, Millerieae, Perityleae etc. Key Words: Phytomelanin Layer; Cypselar Surface; Compositae INTRODUCTION The Compositae are regarded as a fairly advanced family of the dicotyledons (Takhtajan, 1997) and are one of the largest family of angiosperms, consisting of 43 tribes, 1600- 1700 genera and 24000 species (Funk et al., 2009). Many members of the Compositae are cosmopolitan, found specially in temperate or tropical montane regions and open and / or dry habitats. Phytomelanin layer is made up of a type of hard, black, water resistant resinous or tanniniferous or polyvinyl alcohol containing disputed phytomelanin substance, usually found in the cypselar wall of some members of the family Compositae belonging to the tribes Coreopsideae (Jana and Mukherjee, 2012), Heliantheae, Eupatorieae (Pandey and Dakhal, 2001) etc.
    [Show full text]
  • 2002 Sensitive Plant Survey Results for the Valencia Commerce Center
    Dudek and Associates, Inc., "2002 Sensitive Plant Survey Results for the Valencia Commerce Center, Los Angeles County, California" (January 2003; 2002C) 2002 Sensitive Plant Survey Results Valencia Commerce Center J A N U A R Y 2 0 0 3 P R E P A R E D F O R : The Newhall Land and Farming Company 23823 Valencia Blvd. Valencia, CA 91355 P R E P A R E D B Y : Dudek & Associates, Inc. 605 Third Street Encinitas, CA 92024 2002 Sensitive Plant Survey Results for the Valencia Commerce Center Los Angeles County, California Prepared for: The Newhall Land and Farming Company 23823 Valencia Boulevard Valencia, CA 91355 Contact: Glenn Adamick Prepared by: 605 Third Street Encinitas, CA 92024 Contact: Mark A. Elvin (760) 942-5147 January 23, 2003 2002 Sensitive Plant Survey Results Valencia Commerce Center TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No. 1.0 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................1 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION...................................................................................................1 2.1 Plant Communities and Land Covers ................................................................5 2.2 Geology and Soils ................................................................................................5 3.0 METHODS AND SURVEY LIMITATIONS..........................................................5 3.1 Literature Review ................................................................................................6 3.2 Field Reconnaissance Methods...........................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Botanical Survey Report Horseshoe Pond Restoration Project Point Reyes National Seashore Marin County, California
    Botanical Survey Report Horseshoe Pond Restoration Project Point Reyes National Seashore Marin County, California Prepared By: Lorraine Parsons Point Reyes National Seashore Division of Natural Resources Management Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 May 17, 2002 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 REGULATORY BACKGROUND The purpose of this report is to provide background information regarding botanical resources within the Horseshoe Pond Restoration Project area (Proposed Project Area). Point Reyes National Seashore (Seashore) is preparing an Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Proposed Project. Background information in this report will be used to guide development and assess potential environmental impacts of the Proposed Project. As part of the EA, the Seashore must consider whether the Proposed Project could impact special status plant species, as well as special status wildlife species and other sensitive biological resources such as wetlands and riparian areas. Special status plant species include those that are legally protected under the federal and California Endangered Species Acts (ESA) or other regulations and species that are considered rare by the scientific community. Special status species are defined as: • plants that are listed or proposed for listing as threatened or endangered under the California ESA (Fish and Game Code §2050 et seq.; 14 CCR §670.1 et seq.) and/or the federal ESA (50 CFR 17.11 for animals; various notices in the Federal Register [FR] for proposed species); • plants that are candidates for possible future listing as threatened or endangered under the federal ESA (61 FR 7506 February 28, 1996); • plants that meet the definition of rare or endangered under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (14 CCR §15380) which includes species not found on state or federal endangered species lists; • plants that are designated as “species of concern” (former category 2 candidates for listing) by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Design Documentation
    Appendix A: Conceptual Design Documentation APPENDIX A Conceptual Design Documentation June 2019 A-1 APPENDIX A: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN DOCUMENTATION The environmental analyses in the NEPA and CEQA documents for the proposed improvements at Oceano County Airport (the Airport) are based on conceptual designs prepared to provide a realistic basis for assessing their environmental consequences. 1. Widen runway from 50 to 60 feet 2. Widen Taxiways A, A-1, A-2, A-3, and A-4 from 20 to 25 feet 3. Relocate segmented circle and wind cone 4. Installation of taxiway edge lighting 5. Installation of hold position signage 6. Installation of a new electrical vault and connections 7. Installation of a pollution control facility (wash rack) CIVIL ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS The purpose of this conceptual design effort is to identify the amount of impervious surface, grading (cut and fill) and drainage implications of the projects identified above. The conceptual design calculations detailed in the following figures indicate that Projects 1 and 2, widening the runways and taxiways would increase the total amount of impervious surface on the Airport by 32,016 square feet, or 0.73 acres; a 6.6 percent increase in the Airport’s impervious surface area. Drainage patterns would remain the same as both the runway and taxiways would continue to sheet flow from their centerlines to the edge of pavement and then into open, grassed areas. The existing drainage system is able to accommodate the modest increase in stormwater runoff that would occur, particularly as soil conditions on the Airport are conducive to infiltration. Figure A-1 shows the locations of the seven projects incorporated in the Proposed Action.
    [Show full text]
  • Botany Biological Evaluation
    APPENDIX I Botany Biological Evaluation Biological Evaluation for Threatened, Endangered and Sensitive Plants and Fungi Page 1 of 35 for the Upper Truckee River Sunset Stables Restoration Project November 2009 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE – FOREST SERVICE LAKE TAHOE BASIN MANAGEMENT UNIT Upper Truckee River Sunset Stables Restoration Project El Dorado County, CA Biological Evaluation for Threatened, Endangered and Sensitive Plants and Fungi PREPARED BY: ENTRIX, Inc. DATE: November 2009 APPROVED BY: DATE: _____________ Name, Forest Botanist, Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit SUMMARY OF EFFECTS DETERMINATION AND MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS AND/OR REQUIREMENTS One population of a special-status bryophyte, three-ranked hump-moss (Meesia triquetra), was observed in the survey area during surveys on June 30, 2008 and August 28, 2008. The proposed action will not affect the moss because the population is located outside the project area where no action is planned. The following species of invasive or noxious weeds were identified during surveys of the Project area: cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum); bullthistle (Cirsium vulgare); Klamathweed (Hypericum perforatum); oxe-eye daisy (Leucanthemum vulgare); and common mullein (Verbascum Thapsus). The threat posed by these weed populations would not increase if the proposed action is implemented. An inventory and assessment of invasive and noxious weeds in the survey area is presented in the Noxious Weed Risk Assessment for the Upper Truckee River Sunset Stables Restoration Project (ENTRIX 2009). Based on the description of the proposed action and the evaluation contained herein, we have determined the following: There would be no significant effect to plant species listed as threatened, endangered, proposed for listing, or candidates under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA), administered by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Report for the San Fernando Valley Spineflower (Chorizanthe Parryi Var
    Comments on “Species Report for the San Fernando Valley Spineflower (Chorizanthe parryi var. fernandina)” The report presents a misleading representation of the threat of Argentine ant invasion into the areas planned for development by the Newhall Land Company and inadequate information regarding the pollination biology of the SFVS (San Fernando Valley Spineflower). For these reasons, my professional opinion, which is based on over 20 years of experience studying the Argentine ant in the field in California, is that additional research would have to be conducted to assess how the planned developments would impact the Santa Clarita populations of SFVS. In the sections of the report dealing with Argentine ant invasion, several points require clarification. (1) In the interior portions of southern California, the Argentine ant is limited by soil moisture and tends to occur primarily in riparian woodlands and irrigated areas, which can include urban, suburban and agricultural environments. That said, all of the isolated patches of SFVS in Santa Clarita, if exposed to the development illustrated in Figure 4 of the report, would likely be vulnerable to Argentine ant invasion given that they would be surrounded either by urban development or by the Santa Clarita River riparian corridor. Planned urban and suburban developments would affect (and mostly increase) soil moisture levels in unexpected ways by changing impermeable surface cover, storm water run off, flood control measures, irrigation, and landscaping. These changes will increase the risk that isolated SFVS reserves will become invaded by the Argentine ant but will likely do so in ways that are not easy to predict.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 4.3.1 Existing Conditions Methodology
    4.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 4.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES This section identifies biological resources present on the project site and assesses the project’s impacts upon those resources. It is based on previous biological resource assessments for the site (conducted for the applicant) and a review of those assessments and supplemental field surveys and research conducted by the City’s EIR consultant. Since the Notice of Preparation was published March 9, 2010, the applicant has undertaken minimal amount of site disturbance activity for environmental research and maintenance. These activities involved conducting cultural resources investigations in March 2011, fuel maintenance as required by the County Fire Department in May 2011, and geotechnical exploration of the project site to assess possible construction design (i.e. foundation designs) on June 13-15, 2011. Each of these activities was planned and monitored to avoid any significant biological resources. Fuel modification is conducted on an ongoing basis once every three months. 4.3.1 Existing Conditions This section discusses the regional setting, project site conditions, and the existing and potentially occurring biological resources at the project site. Biological resources within the surrounding area are also discussed, when relevant. Methodology The description of existing conditions provided below is based on a literature review and site surveys. Literature Review The literature review included previous site-specific and non site-specific studies and California Department of Fish and
    [Show full text]
  • Mcgrath State Beach Plants 2/14/2005 7:53 PM Vascular Plants of Mcgrath State Beach, Ventura County, California by David L
    Vascular Plants of McGrath State Beach, Ventura County, California By David L. Magney Scientific Name Common Name Habit Family Abronia maritima Red Sand-verbena PH Nyctaginaceae Abronia umbellata Beach Sand-verbena PH Nyctaginaceae Allenrolfea occidentalis Iodinebush S Chenopodiaceae Amaranthus albus * Prostrate Pigweed AH Amaranthaceae Amblyopappus pusillus Dwarf Coastweed PH Asteraceae Ambrosia chamissonis Beach-bur S Asteraceae Ambrosia psilostachya Western Ragweed PH Asteraceae Amsinckia spectabilis var. spectabilis Seaside Fiddleneck AH Boraginaceae Anagallis arvensis * Scarlet Pimpernel AH Primulaceae Anemopsis californica Yerba Mansa PH Saururaceae Apium graveolens * Wild Celery PH Apiaceae Artemisia biennis Biennial Wormwood BH Asteraceae Artemisia californica California Sagebrush S Asteraceae Artemisia douglasiana Douglas' Sagewort PH Asteraceae Artemisia dracunculus Wormwood PH Asteraceae Artemisia tridentata ssp. tridentata Big Sagebrush S Asteraceae Arundo donax * Giant Reed PG Poaceae Aster subulatus var. ligulatus Annual Water Aster AH Asteraceae Astragalus pycnostachyus ssp. lanosissimus Ventura Marsh Milkvetch PH Fabaceae Atriplex californica California Saltbush PH Chenopodiaceae Atriplex lentiformis ssp. breweri Big Saltbush S Chenopodiaceae Atriplex patula ssp. hastata Arrowleaf Saltbush AH Chenopodiaceae Atriplex patula Spear Saltbush AH Chenopodiaceae Atriplex semibaccata Australian Saltbush PH Chenopodiaceae Atriplex triangularis Spearscale AH Chenopodiaceae Avena barbata * Slender Oat AG Poaceae Avena fatua * Wild
    [Show full text]
  • December 3Rd, 2018 Eliza Laws Senior
    December 3rd, 2018 Eliza Laws Senior Environmental Analyst Albert A. Webb Associates 3788 McCray Street Riverside, CA 92506 Re: Biological Resources Constraints Assessment for the Snow Drop Road Improvements Project, Unincorporated San Bernardino County, California Dear Ms. Laws: The following letter report presents the updated results of a biological resources constraints assessment of potential sensitive natural or regulated resources located within and/or immediately adjacent to the Snow Drop Road Improvements study area (Study Area). The report has been prepared to support compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) documentation including the preparation of an Initial Study (IS), Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) or Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and environmental review process conducted by the County of San Bernardino Special Districts Department, California. As discussed below, the assessment included a thorough literature review, site reconnaissance characterizing existing conditions (including floral, faunal and dominant vegetation communities), and summary of biological resources constraints. STUDY AREA LOCATION The 15.86-acre Study Area is located within the unincorporated region of San Bernardino County, California immediately north of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as shown in Attachment A, Regional Location Map. Specifically, the Study Area includes an approximately 2-mile reach of Archibald Avenue, Haven Avenue and Snow Drop Road as shown in Attachment B, Study Area Map. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project will include road improvements throughout the Study Area including road widening, select driveway improvements, pavement, and construction and/or improvements to existing and proposed drainage features including but not limited to culverts and associated rip/rap features. METHODOLOGY The following section details the methods implemented prior and during the reconnaissance survey conducted throughout the Study Area.
    [Show full text]
  • Guideline 410 Prohibited Plant List
    VENTURA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 165 DURLEY AVENUE CAMARILLO, CA 93010 www.vcfd.org Office: 805-389-9738 Fax: 805-388-4356 GUIDELINE 410 PROHIBITED PLANT LIST This list was first published by the VCFD in 2014. It has been updated as of April 2019. It is intended to provide a list of plants and trees that are not allowed within a new required defensible space (DS) or fuel modification zone (FMZ). It is highly recommended that these plants and trees be thinned and or removed from existing DS and FMZs. In certain instances, the Fire Department may require the thinning and or removal. This list was prepared by Hunt Research Corporation and Dudek & Associates, and reviewed by Scott Franklin Consulting Co, VCFD has added some plants and has removed plants only listed due to freezing hazard. Please see notes after the list of plants. For questions regarding this list, please contact the Fire Hazard reduction Program (FHRP) Unit at 085-389-9759 or [email protected] Prohibited plant list:Botanical Name Common Name Comment* Trees Abies species Fir F Acacia species (numerous) Acacia F, I Agonis juniperina Juniper Myrtle F Araucaria species (A. heterophylla, A. Araucaria (Norfolk Island Pine, Monkey F araucana, A. bidwillii) Puzzle Tree, Bunya Bunya) Callistemon species (C. citrinus, C. rosea, C. Bottlebrush (Lemon, Rose, Weeping) F viminalis) Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar F Casuarina cunninghamiana River She-Oak F Cedrus species (C. atlantica, C. deodara) Cedar (Atlas, Deodar) F Chamaecyparis species (numerous) False Cypress F Cinnamomum camphora Camphor F Cryptomeria japonica Japanese Cryptomeria F Cupressocyparis leylandii Leyland Cypress F Cupressus species (C.
    [Show full text]