DOCSLIB.ORG

The Evolutionary Blackbird

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Evolutionary Blackbird spring books and arts behaviour only after development in a C57 uterus. Ridley’s historical tour of several disci- plines is a delight: the pivotal players in ethology, neurobiology, anthropology and psychology are brought to life in engaging pen-portraits. We encounter anthropologist Franz Boas in 1884 during his first field season among the Inuit of Baffin Island as he notes in his diary: “These are the ‘savages’ whose lives are supposed to be worth noth- ing compared with a civilized European. I do not believe that we, if living under the same conditions, would be so willing to work or be so cheerful and happy.” Konrad Lorenz appears both in his best-remembered guise, pursued by a string of adoring ducklings, and in an altogether more sinister one. While working as a military psychologist in Poland in 1942, Lorenz participated in SS-sponsored research designed to distinguish between inferior Polish and superior German Books by vertebrate palaeontologists are of knowledge about life, from the fauna of characteristics in ‘half-breeds’. Nor does dominated by animals with bones, despite hydrothermal vents to the anatomy of plant- J. B. Watson of behaviourism fame fare too the fact that vertebrates make up a tiny pro- eating birds’ digestive tracts. For the most well in retrospect: his fall from grace was portion of the world’s biodiversity today — part, he has kept abreast of the latest develop- occasioned by an extramarital love affair, not to mention the fact that they didn’t ments in evolutionary research, although and he ended up, appropriately enough, exist for the first 3 billion years or so of life’s from time to time he slips back into comfort- applying his skills in pavlovian conditioning history. The Precambrian expert Andrew able textbook explanations. Describing the to advertising Johnson’s baby powder. The Knoll has looked at those first 3 billion great domains of life, for example, he writes: human detail enriches Nature via Nurture, years in great detail in his new book Life on “The Archaebacteria also fall into two but Ridley by no means subscribes to the a Young Planet (to be reviewed in Nature groups, both of which have lifestyles that are modern dumb-it-down school of science shortly), leaving the details of dinosaurs very unusual, but which could have been writing, in which the science itself becomes a and mastodons to others. For yet another maintained on the ancient earth.” These sideshow to the serious business of prying take, try The Major Transitions in Evolution microbes (which are now generally called into the scientists’ personal lives. by John Maynard Smith and Eörs Szathmáry. Archaea, not Archaebacteria) can indeed be Ridley’s book reminds us of the impor- For them, the essence of life’s history is the found in strange places, such as geysers and tance of good science writing. Because he emergence of new kinds of complexity. oxygen-free swamps. But they can also be is not a professional scientist, Ridley is not Instead of fossils, you get equations. found in ordinary places, such as grassland stuck deep in a disciplinary trench and has In The Story of Life, Oxford ecologist soil and the open ocean, where they out- the freedom to range across huge swathes Richard Southwood takes his own look at number bacteria. Archaea got a reputation of intellectual territory. In doing so, he has the evolutionary blackbird. Southwood is a for being bizarre only because scientists dis- given us a rich overview and a compellingly leading figure in ecology, thanks to his covered their more unusual members first. integrated picture of a great deal of science, seminal work on insects and his landmark A more serious shortcoming in The Story both old and new. Make Nature via Nurture book Ecological Methods. For 18 years he of Life is the scant attention paid to DNA, part of your nurture. I taught an introductory course on the history which has revolutionized our understanding Andrew Berry is at the Museum of Comparative of life, and out of that experience has sprung of evolution’s course. The ecological changes Zoology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford Street, The Story of Life. Not surprisingly, South- that Southwood details were made possible Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA. wood sees the history of life in an ecological by changes to genes, and scientists are start- light, not as a single-file parade of new life ing to get some hints of what those changes forms but as a network of species whose links were, from the promiscuous gene swapping are being perpetually reworked. between early microbes to the recruitment This network first took shape over 3 billion of old genes to make new structures such as The evolutionary years ago, as early microbes cooperated to jaws and fingers. harness the energy in their environment. Despite these grumbles, I recommend blackbird The network grew more complex as animals The Story of Life to those looking for a The Story of Life and other multicellular organisms evolved, swift, efficient delivery of the most impor- by Richard Southwood and as reefs offered new ecospaces for tant information we have on how life has Oxford University Press: 2003. 272 pp. £19.99 species to colonize. Southwood recounts blossomed on Earth. Southwood is succinct Carl Zimmer how dry land was transformed over hun- and clear, and his narrative rarely gets dreds of millions of years, as bacterial crusts bogged down with historical digressions or The poet Wallace Stevens wrote about 13 gave way to forests that offered a new eco- personal anecdotes. Although this style has ways of looking at a blackbird. Perhaps space as vast as that of coral reefs. Over its strengths, it also has its weaknesses. At the someday another poet will write about 13 time, ecosystems change like gently tapped beginning of his book, Southwood claims ways of looking at the history of life. I can kaleidoscopes, Southwood writes, although that the story of life “provides a bench- certainly think of 13 different scientists who mass extinctions give them a good shake mark for judgments on the environmental have written books on the subject, each of from time to time. problems of today”. But when Southwood which is coloured by its author’s expertise. Southwood displays an impressive sweep finally reaches our own age, he seems almost NATURE | VOL 422 | 24 APRIL 2003 | www.nature.com/nature © 2003 Nature Publishing Group 815 spring books and arts indifferent as he zips through the ways that Because of ill-health and hearing difficulties, we are altering the climate and the planet’s Mitchell preferred to carry out discussions ecosystems. A little more passion would by lengthy correspondence, which is have been welcome. After all, these days the extensively quoted in this book. The evolutionary blackbird is beginning to look title refers to Mitchell’s comparison more like a canary in a coal mine. I of the human mind to a garden in Carl Zimmer is a freelance writer who lives in which are planted facts and ideas, New York. His most recent book is Evolution: which one keeps on rearranging, even The Triumph of an Idea. when asleep. Mitchell worked in the University of Cambridge as an undergraduate, research student and staff member for 16 years from 1939 to 1955. Metabolic He did not have a particularly distinguished academic gardening record, nor does he seem Wandering in the Gardens of the to have been completely at Mind: Peter Mitchell and the home in the biochemistry depart- Making of Glynn ment, despite its wealth of talent. by John Prebble and Bruce Weber However, in his last few years Oxford University Press: 2003. 344 pp. there he published, together with $65, £45.50 Jennifer Moyle, experiments on E. C. Slater the transport of phosphate into the bacterial cell that foreshadowed the Peter Mitchell was an outstanding theoreti- work for which he became famous. Moyle cal biologist who had what Leslie Orgel remained his scientific collaborator until has characterized as a counterintuitive idea her retirement in 1983. that led to a fundamental shift in the way There are some errors in the description that biochemists viewed energy metabolism. of the Cambridge environment concerning The story of the gradual replacement of the the Molteno Institute of Parasitology and is surprising, considering that I worked chemical hypothesis of energy transduc- Biology, headed by David Keilin, where there from late 1946 to 1955, during which tion, which involved a non-phosphorylated Mitchell is described as having found “shel- time I published the chemical hypothesis of high-energy intermediate (not a phosphate ter” (possibly in late 1945 to early 1946). E. F. oxidative phosphorylation in Nature in 1953. compound, as stated in this book), with Hartree was not a member of the technical It is the overthrow of this hypothesis by the chemiosmotic theory has become, for staff, as stated in this book, but a PhD from Mitchell that is a major theme of this book. historians of science, a classic example of the University of London and co-author of In 1955, Mitchell moved to the Univer- how a paradigm shift occurs. most of Keilin’s classic papers for over 20 sity of Edinburgh, where he developed the In this biography, the story is related years. I am described as an “occasional post- first version of the chemiosmotic theory, again, primarily from Mitchell’s viewpoint. doctoral researcher” in the institute, which which was published in Nature in 1961. Ill- ness soon caused him to move to Cornwall, where he converted a derelict manor house History in the making called Glynn House into a private laboratory as “a quiet haven for untrammelled scientific It was one of the most momentous work and thought”, as he wrote to me in moments in the history of science, 1964.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Insight from the Sociology of Science
    CHAPTER 7 INSIGHT FROM THE SOCIOLOGY OF SCIENCE Science is What Scientists Do It has been argued a number of times in previous chapters that empirical adequacy is insufficient, in itself, to establish the validity of a theory: consistency with the observable ‘facts’ does not mean that a theory is true,1 only that it might be true, along with other theories that may also correspond with the observational data. Moreover, empirical inadequacy (theories unable to account for all the ‘facts’ in their domain) is frequently ignored by individual scientists in their fight to establish a new theory or retain an existing one. It has also been argued that because experi- ments are conceived and conducted within a particular theoretical, procedural and instrumental framework, they cannot furnish the theory-free data needed to make empirically-based judgements about the superiority of one theory over another. What counts as relevant evidence is, in part, determined by the theoretical framework the evidence is intended to test. It follows that the rationality of science is rather different from the account we usually provide for students in school. Experiment and observation are not as decisive as we claim. Additional factors that may play a part in theory acceptance include the following: intuition, aesthetic considerations, similarity and consistency among theories, intellectual fashion, social and economic influences, status of the proposer(s), personal motives and opportunism. Although the evidence may be inconclusive, scientists’ intuitive feelings about the plausibility or aptness of particular ideas will make it appear convincing. The history of science includes many accounts of scientists ‘sticking to their guns’ concerning a well-loved theory in the teeth of evidence to the contrary, and some- times in the absence of any evidence at all.
    [Show full text]
  • The Joys and Burdens of Our Heroes 12/05/2021
    More Fun Than Fun: The Joys and Burdens of Our Heroes 12/05/2021 An iconic photo of Konrad Lorenz with his favourite geese. Photo: Willamette Biology, CC BY-SA 2.0 This article is part of the ‘More Fun Than Fun‘ column by Prof Raghavendra Gadagkar. He will explore interesting research papers or books and, while placing them in context, make them accessible to a wide readership. RAGHAVENDRA GADAGKAR Among the books I read as a teenager, two completely changed my life. One was The Double Helix by Nobel laureate James D. Watson. This book was inspiring at many levels and instantly got me addicted to molecular biology. The other was King Solomon’s Ring by Konrad Lorenz, soon to be a Nobel laureate. The study of animal behaviour so charmingly and unforgettably described by Lorenz kindled in me an eternal love for the subject. The circumstances in which I read these two books are etched in my mind and may have partly contributed to my enthusiasm for them and their subjects. The Double Helix was first published in London in 1968 when I was a pre-university student (equivalent to 11th grade) at St Joseph’s college in Bangalore and was planning to apply for the prestigious National Science Talent Search Scholarship. By then, I had heard of the discovery of the double-helical structure of DNA and its profound implications. I was also tickled that this momentous discovery was made in 1953, the year of my birth. I saw the announcement of Watson’s book on the notice board in the British Council Library, one of my frequent haunts.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery of DNA Structure and Function: Watson and Crick By: Leslie A
    01/08/2018 Discovery of DNA Double Helix: Watson and Crick | Learn Science at Scitable NUCLEIC ACID STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION | Lead Editor: Bob Moss Discovery of DNA Structure and Function: Watson and Crick By: Leslie A. Pray, Ph.D. © 2008 Nature Education Citation: Pray, L. (2008) Discovery of DNA structure and function: Watson and Crick. Nature Education 1(1):100 The landmark ideas of Watson and Crick relied heavily on the work of other scientists. What did the duo actually discover? Aa Aa Aa Many people believe that American biologist James Watson and English physicist Francis Crick discovered DNA in the 1950s. In reality, this is not the case. Rather, DNA was first identified in the late 1860s by Swiss chemist Friedrich Miescher. Then, in the decades following Miescher's discovery, other scientists--notably, Phoebus Levene and Erwin Chargaff--carried out a series of research efforts that revealed additional details about the DNA molecule, including its primary chemical components and the ways in which they joined with one another. Without the scientific foundation provided by these pioneers, Watson and Crick may never have reached their groundbreaking conclusion of 1953: that the DNA molecule exists in the form of a three-dimensional double helix. The First Piece of the Puzzle: Miescher Discovers DNA Although few people realize it, 1869 was a landmark year in genetic research, because it was the year in which Swiss physiological chemist Friedrich Miescher first identified what he called "nuclein" inside the nuclei of human white blood cells. (The term "nuclein" was later changed to "nucleic acid" and eventually to "deoxyribonucleic acid," or "DNA.") Miescher's plan was to isolate and characterize not the nuclein (which nobody at that time realized existed) but instead the protein components of leukocytes (white blood cells).
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge's 92 Nobel Prize Winners Part 2 - 1951 to 1974: from Crick and Watson to Dorothy Hodgkin
    Cambridge's 92 Nobel Prize winners part 2 - 1951 to 1974: from Crick and Watson to Dorothy Hodgkin By Cambridge News | Posted: January 18, 2016 By Adam Care The News has been rounding up all of Cambridge's 92 Nobel Laureates, celebrating over 100 years of scientific and social innovation. ADVERTISING In this installment we move from 1951 to 1974, a period which saw a host of dramatic breakthroughs, in biology, atomic science, the discovery of pulsars and theories of global trade. It's also a period which saw The Eagle pub come to national prominence and the appearance of the first female name in Cambridge University's long Nobel history. The Gender Pay Gap Sale! Shop Online to get 13.9% off From 8 - 11 March, get 13.9% off 1,000s of items, it highlights the pay gap between men & women in the UK. Shop the Gender Pay Gap Sale – now. Promoted by Oxfam 1. 1951 Ernest Walton, Trinity College: Nobel Prize in Physics, for using accelerated particles to study atomic nuclei 2. 1951 John Cockcroft, St John's / Churchill Colleges: Nobel Prize in Physics, for using accelerated particles to study atomic nuclei Walton and Cockcroft shared the 1951 physics prize after they famously 'split the atom' in Cambridge 1932, ushering in the nuclear age with their particle accelerator, the Cockcroft-Walton generator. In later years Walton returned to his native Ireland, as a fellow of Trinity College Dublin, while in 1951 Cockcroft became the first master of Churchill College, where he died 16 years later. 3. 1952 Archer Martin, Peterhouse: Nobel Prize in Chemistry, for developing partition chromatography 4.
    [Show full text]
  • AMNH Digital Library
    ^^<e?& THERE ARE THOSE WHO DO. AND THOSE WHO WOULDACOULDASHOULDA. Which one are you? If you're the kind of person who's willing to put it all on the line to pursue your goal, there's AIG. The organization with more ways to manage risk and more financial solutions than anyone else. Everything from business insurance for growing companies to travel-accident coverage to retirement savings plans. All to help you act boldly in business and in life. So the next time you're facing an uphill challenge, contact AIG. THE GREATEST RISK IS NOT TAKING ONE: AIG INSURANCE, FINANCIAL SERVICES AND THE FREEDOM TO DARE. Insurance and services provided by members of American International Group, Inc.. 70 Pine Street, Dept. A, New York, NY 10270. vww.aig.com TODAY TOMORROW TOYOTA Each year Toyota builds more than one million vehicles in North America. This means that we use a lot of resources — steel, aluminum, and plastics, for instance. But at Toyota, large scale manufacturing doesn't mean large scale waste. In 1992 we introduced our Global Earth Charter to promote environmental responsibility throughout our operations. And in North America it is already reaping significant benefits. We recycle 376 million pounds of steel annually, and aggressive recycling programs keep 18 million pounds of other scrap materials from landfills. Of course, no one ever said that looking after the Earth's resources is easy. But as we continue to strive for greener ways to do business, there's one thing we're definitely not wasting. And that's time. www.toyota.com/tomorrow ©2001 JUNE 2002 VOLUME 111 NUMBER 5 FEATURES AVIAN QUICK-CHANGE ARTISTS How do house finches thrive in so many environments? By reshaping themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction and Historical Perspective
    Chapter 1 Introduction and Historical Perspective “ Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. ” modified by the developmental history of the organism, Theodosius Dobzhansky its physiology – from cellular to systems levels – and by the social and physical environment. Finally, behaviors are shaped through evolutionary forces of natural selection OVERVIEW that optimize survival and reproduction ( Figure 1.1 ). Truly, the study of behavior provides us with a window through Behavioral genetics aims to understand the genetic which we can view much of biology. mechanisms that enable the nervous system to direct Understanding behaviors requires a multidisciplinary appropriate interactions between organisms and their perspective, with regulation of gene expression at its core. social and physical environments. Early scientific The emerging field of behavioral genetics is still taking explorations of animal behavior defined the fields shape and its boundaries are still being defined. Behavioral of experimental psychology and classical ethology. genetics has evolved through the merger of experimental Behavioral genetics has emerged as an interdisciplin- psychology and classical ethology with evolutionary biol- ary science at the interface of experimental psychology, ogy and genetics, and also incorporates aspects of neuro- classical ethology, genetics, and neuroscience. This science ( Figure 1.2 ). To gain a perspective on the current chapter provides a brief overview of the emergence of definition of this field, it is helpful
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Article in PDF Format
    BIO Web of Conferences 4, 00014 (2015) DOI: 10.1051/bioconf/20150400014 C Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2015 From neonts to filionts and their progenies... Biodiversity draws its origins from the origins of life itself Marie-Christine Maurela Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB - UMR 7205 – CNRS, MNHN, UPMC, EPHE), Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Sorbonne Universités, 45 rue Buffon, CP. 50, 75005 Paris, France “Should the question of the priority of the egg over the chicken, or of the chicken over the egg disturb you, it is because you assume that animals were originally what they are to-day; what madness!" The dream of d’Alembert, 1760, Denis Diderot Abstract. Since the origins, different modes of life exist. Indeed it is difficult to imagine how things could have been constructed by a single event that would have marked the birth of life. A brief historical background of the subject will be presented here. Then, we shall wander through the history of the discoveries that have led the way of experimental science over the last 150 years and shall dwell on one of the major paradigms, that of the RNA World. This paradigm illustrates the path followed by the living that tries all possible means when expressed at the molecular level as simple free molecule leading to RNA fragments and to modern subviral particles such as viroids then to ramifications and compartments. Between the ancient and the modern RNA world we underline how environment talks to molecules leading to the global living tissus which establish the ground of biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Biography (Modified, After Festetics 1983)
    Konrad Lorenz’s Biography (modified, after Festetics 1983) 1903: Konrad Zacharias Lorenz (KL) was born in Altenberg /Austria on Nov. 7 as the last of three children of Emma Lorenz and Dr. Adolf Lorenz, professor for orthopedics at the Medical branch of the University of Vienna. In the same year the representative and spacious Altenberg family home was finished. 1907: KL starts keeping animals, such as spotted newts in aquaria, raises some ducklings and is not pleased by his first experiences with a dachshound. Niko Tinbergen, his lifelong colleague and friend, is born on April 15 in Den Haag, The Netherlands. 1909: KL enters elementary school and engages in systematic studies in crustaceans. 1910: Oskar Heinroth, biologist and founder of "Vergleichende Verhaltensforschung" (comparative ethology) from Berlin and fatherlike scientific mentor of the young KL publishes his classical paper on the ethology of ducks. 1915: KL enters highschool (Schottengymnasium Wien), keeps and breeds songbirds. 1918: Wallace Craig publishes the comparative ethology of Columbidae (pigeons), a classics of late US biologist Charles O. Whitman, who was like O. Heinroth, a founding father of comparative ethology. 1921: KL excels in his final exams. Together with friend Bernhard Hellmann, he observes and experiments with aggression in a cichlid (Herichthys cyanoguttatum). This was the base for KL's psychohydraulic model of motivation. 1922: Father Adolf sends KL to New York to take 2 semesters of medicine courses at the ColumbiaUniversity, but mainly to interrupt the relationship of KL with longterm girlfriend Gretl Gebhart, his later wife. This paternal attempt to influence the mate choice of KL failed.
    [Show full text]
  • Creation, Design and Evolution: Can Science Discover Or Eliminate God?
    University of St. Thomas Journal of Law and Public Policy Volume 4 Issue 1 Fall 2009 Article 5 January 2009 Creation, Design and Evolution: Can Science Discover or Eliminate God? Peter M.J. Hess Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.stthomas.edu/ustjlpp Part of the First Amendment Commons, Law and Philosophy Commons, and the Religion Law Commons Recommended Citation Peter M. Hess, Creation, Design and Evolution: Can Science Discover or Eliminate God?, 4 U. ST. THOMAS J.L. & PUB. POL'Y 102 (2009). Available at: https://ir.stthomas.edu/ustjlpp/vol4/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UST Research Online and the University of St. Thomas Journal of Law and Public Policy. For more information, please contact the Editor-in-Chief at [email protected]. CREATION, DESIGN AND EVOLUTION: CAN SCIENCE DISCOVER OR ELIMINATE GOD? PETER M. J. HESS, PH.D.* NATIONAL CENTER FOR SCIENCE EDUCATION "The heavens declare the glory of God, and the firmament shows forth his handiwork." Psalms 19:1 INTRODUCTION: THE PLAYING OUT OF THE DESIGN ARGUMENT IN THE WEST Every culture has its views about the universe, about the human person, and about the great metaphysical questions that confront us. How ought we to think about the relationship between cosmology, anthropology, and theology? This may be a challenge for us in our increasingly secular post- modem culture, but for most of human history it was not an issue. In the Judeo-Christian tradition these areas of human reflection were naturally bound up together, as in the Hebrew psalmist's proto-statement of the argument from design: "the heavens declare the glory of God, and the firmament shows forth his handiwork."' The scholastic university culture of the High Middle Ages held as its ideal the "unity of knowledge," or unitas scientiae, approaching the study of the universe as a coherent and knowable whole.
    [Show full text]
  • 2862 001 OCR DBL ZIP 0.Pdf
    , , .- GREAT SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENTS Twenty Experiments that Changed our View of the World ROM HARRE Oxford New York OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS 1983 Whi'te Oalt OXford Um'wrsity Press, Waftoff Street, OXfordOX'2 6DP LondonGlasgov) New Yorn Toronto Delhi &mbay Calcutta Madras Knrachi Kuala'LumpurSingapore HangKnng·Tokyo Nairobi Dar es Salaam Cape Town Mel~urne Auckland and associates in Beirut Berlin [hac/an Mexico City Nicosia © Phaidon Press limited 1981 First published by Phaidon Press Limited /981 First issued as an Oxford University Press Paperback 1983 All n'ghts reserved. No port of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by atiy means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without ., the prior permission oj Oxford University Press This book is sold subject to the condition that it shall n(Jt,~by way oftrade or otherwise, be Jent, re-sold, hired out or otheruxse circulated without the pilblisher's prior consent in any fonn of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and ulithout a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Ham, Rom Great scientific experiments.-{Oxford paperbacks) 1. Science-experiments-History 1. Title SfJ1'.24 Q125 ISBN 0-19-286036-4 library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data , Harrl, Rmnimo. Great scientific experimetus. (Oxford paperbacks) " Biblwgraphy: p. Includes index. 1. Scieni:e-MethodlJ~(Ue studies. 2.-Science-Expen"men/$-PhI1osopf!y. 3. Science-Histo1y--Sources. 4. Scientists_Biograpf!y. I. Title. QI75.H32541983 507'.2 82';'19035 ISBN 0-19-286036-4 (pbk.) Printed in Great Britain by R.
    [Show full text]
  • Synapses, Sea Slugs, and Psychiatry
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001;70:1–3 1 J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.70.1.1 on 1 January 2001. Downloaded from EDITORIAL Synapses, sea slugs, and psychiatry This year’s Nobel Prize in physiology or medicine, announced literature than medicine. However, his Austrian contempo- on 9 October 2000, has gone to Arvid Carlsson, Paul Green- rary, Wagner von Jauregg, became the first psychiatrist lau- gard, and Eric Kandel. The citation states that the prize is reate in 1927 for his observations on the beneficial eVects shared for pioneering discoveries in slow synaptic transmis- of induced fever (for example, malaria) on the symptoms of sion, which are “crucial for an understanding of how the nor- neurosyphillis—not, it has to be said, a treatment that has mal functioning of the brain and how disturbances in this sig- stood the test of time. But European psychiatry at the fin de nal can give rise to neurological and psychiatric diseases” siecle was resolutely biological. Egaz Moniz, the Portu- (www.nobel.se/announcement/2000/medicine.html). Carls- guese neurosurgeon who developed psychosurgery, shared son proved the importance of dopamine as a neurotransmitter the prize in 1949, although the invention of arterial angio- and subsequently its role in Parkinson’s disease and graphy was perhaps a more enduring legacy. Neuroscien- schizophrenia. The strongest pillar of the dopamine theory of tists have been so rewarded on many occasions—but as in schizophrenia is the linear relation between potency of anti- this year, the contributions tended to be at the “basic” psychotic drugs and their dopamine antagonist potential.
    [Show full text]
  • MCDB 5220 Methods and Logics April 21 2015 Marcelo Bassalo
    Cracking the Genetic Code MCDB 5220 Methods and Logics April 21 2015 Marcelo Bassalo The DNA Saga… so far Important contributions for cracking the genetic code: • The “transforming principle” (1928) Frederick Griffith The DNA Saga… so far Important contributions for cracking the genetic code: • The “transforming principle” (1928) • The nature of the transforming principle: DNA (1944 - 1952) Oswald Avery Alfred Hershey Martha Chase The DNA Saga… so far Important contributions for cracking the genetic code: • The “transforming principle” (1928) • The nature of the transforming principle: DNA (1944 - 1952) • X-ray diffraction and the structure of proteins (1951) Linus Carl Pauling The DNA Saga… so far Important contributions for cracking the genetic code: • The “transforming principle” (1928) • The nature of the transforming principle: DNA (1944 - 1952) • X-ray diffraction and the structure of proteins (1951) • The structure of DNA (1953) James Watson and Francis Crick The DNA Saga… so far Important contributions for cracking the genetic code: • The “transforming principle” (1928) • The nature of the transforming principle: DNA (1944 - 1952) • X-ray diffraction and the structure of proteins (1951) • The structure of DNA (1953) How is DNA (4 nucleotides) the genetic material while proteins (20 amino acids) are the building blocks? ? DNA Protein ? The Coding Craze ? DNA Protein What was already known? • DNA resides inside the nucleus - DNA is not the carrier • Protein synthesis occur in the cytoplasm through ribosomes {• Only RNA is associated with ribosomes (no DNA) - rRNA is not the carrier { • Ribosomal RNA (rRNA) was a homogeneous population The “messenger RNA” hypothesis François Jacob Jacques Monod The Coding Craze ? DNA RNA Protein RNA Tie Club Table from Wikipedia The Coding Craze Who won the race Marshall Nirenberg J.
    [Show full text]