DOCSLIB.ORG

Assessment of Environmental Flow Requirements for the Gellibrand River

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Assessment of Environmental Flow Requirements for the Gellibrand River Assessment of Environmental Flow Requirements for the Gellibrand River RECOMMENDATIONS Revision E July 2006 Assessment of Environmental Flow Requirements for the Gellibrand River – Recommendations Assessment of Environmental Flow Requirements for the Gellibrand River RECOMMENDATIONS L:\work\NRG\PROJECTS\2005\042 Gellibrand\02\03 Recommendations Paper\Recommendations_RevE.doc Document History: ISSUE REVISION AUTHOR CHECKED APPROVED DESCRIPTION DATE NUMBER Dec 2005 A C.Stephenson L.Roach C.Arnott Preliminary Draft Draft Jan 2006 B C.Stephenson L.Roach C.Arnott Recommendations Draft Feb 2006 C C.Stephenson L.Roach C.Arnott Recommendations Revised May 2006 D C.Stephenson L.Roach C.Arnott Recommendations – Reach 3 July 2006 E C.Stephenson L.Roach L.Roach CCMA Comments Natural Resources Group Earth Tech Engineering Pty Ltd ABN 61 089 482 888 Head Office 71 Queens Road Melbourne VIC 3004 Tel +61 3 8517 9200 All Rights Reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, transmitted, stored in a retrieval system, or translated into any language in any form by any means without the written permission of Corangamite Catchment Management Authority. Intellectual Property Rights All Rights Reserved. All methods, processes, commercial proposals and other contents described in this document are the confidential intellectual property of Corangamite Catchment Management Authority and may not be used or disclosed to any party without the written permission of Corangamite Catchment Management Authority. © Corangamite Catchment Management Authority Assessment of Environmental Flow Requirements for the Gellibrand River – Recommendations Contents Contents .................................................................................................................. i Tables....................................................................................................................... i 1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Outline of this Report ...................................................................................................................4 2 Approach to EWR Analysis .......................................................................... 5 2.1 Flow Analysis ...............................................................................................................................5 2.2 Philosophy of Flow Determination................................................................................................5 2.3 Rates of Rise and Fall..................................................................................................................6 3 Reach Recommendations............................................................................. 7 Reach One – Love Creek Catchment .......................................................................................... 8 Reach Two A – Gellibrand River at James Access Bridge......................................................... 13 Reach Two B – Upper Gellibrand River (downstream of 2A) ..................................................... 18 Reach Three – Carlisle River Catchment................................................................................... 23 Reach Four – Gellibrand River Mid Reach................................................................................. 28 Reach Five – Kennedys Creek Catchment ................................................................................ 33 Reach Six – Estuary................................................................................................................... 38 4 Flow Recommendation Comparison.......................................................... 42 5 Supporting Recommendations .................................................................. 44 6 Conclusion .................................................................................................. 45 7 References................................................................................................... 46 Appendix A Environmental Flow Needs of the Gellibrand River Estuary Tables Table 3-1 Flow Processes and Components – Reach One .....................................9 Table 3-2. Flow recommendations for Reach 1 – Love Creek Catchment .............12 Table 3-3 Recommended average and maximum rates of rise and fall (expressed as the change in discharge of the event divided by the length of the event, ML/day/day) ....................................................................................................12 Table 3-4 Flow Processes and Components – Reach Two A ................................14 Table 3-5. Flow recommendations for Reach 2A – Gellibrand River at James Access Bridge .................................................................................................17 Table 3-6 Recommended average and maximum rates of rise and fall (expressed as the change in discharge of the event divided by the length of the event, ML/day/day) ....................................................................................................17 Table 3-7 Flow Processes and Components – Reach Two B ................................19 Table 3-8. Flow recommendations for Reach 2B – Upper Gellibrand River (downstream of 2A).........................................................................................22 Page i Recommendations_Final.doc July 2006 Assessment of Environmental Flow Requirements for the Gellibrand River – Recommendations Table 3-9 Recommended average and maximum rates of rise and fall (expressed as the change in discharge of the event divided by the length of the event, ML/day/day) ....................................................................................................22 Table 3-10 Flow Processes and Components – Reach Three...............................24 Table 3-11. Flow recommendations for Reach 3 – Carlisle River ..........................27 Table 3-12. Recommended average and maximum rates of rise and fall (expressed as the change in discharge of the event divided by the length of the event, ML/day/day) ....................................................................................................27 Table 3-13 Flow Processes and Components – Reach Four.................................29 Table 3-14. Flow recommendations for Reach 4 – Gellibrand River Mid Reach ....32 Table 3-15. Recommended average and maximum rates of rise and fall (expressed as the change in discharge of the event divided by the length of the event, ML/day/day) ....................................................................................................32 Table 3-16 Flow Processes and Components - Reach Five .................................34 Table 3-17. Flow recommendations for Reach 5 – Kennedys Creek Catchment ...37 Table 3-18. Recommended average and maximum rates of rise and fall (expressed as the change in discharge of the event divided by the length of the event, ML/day/day) ....................................................................................................37 Table 3-19. Risk Matrix for Flow-related Environmental Risks...............................38 Table 3-20. Major ecological processes by which reduced estuary flows can impact estuarine ecosystems (based on Pierson et al , 2002 and cited in Sherwood, 2005)...............................................................................................................39 Table 3-21. Comparison of Flow Recommendations for the Estuary and Reach 4 (immediately upstream of the Estuary) ............................................................41 Table 4-1 Flow Comparison ..................................................................................42 Please cite this document as: Earth Tech (2005). Assessment of Environmental Flow Requirements for the Gellibrand River – Recommendations . Unpublished report to the Corangamite Catchment Management Authority. Page ii Recommendations_Final.doc July 2006 Assessment of Environmental Flow Requirements for the Gellibrand River – Recommendations The Gellibrand River Environmental Water Requirements Technical Panel (the Technical Panel) consists of (in alphabetical order, with fields of expertise): Chris Arnott Chair of the Technical Panel & Project Manager Tim Doeg Macroinvertebrate ecology and fish Ross Hardie Geomorphology James Kaye Riparian vegetation Lisa Roach Hydraulic modelling John Sherwood Estuarine processes The Steering Committee for the project consisted of: Mee Teng Barwon Water Greg Williams Corangamite Catchment Management Authority Steve Nicol Department of Sustainability and the Environment John Whitewood Wannon Water Cameron Welsh Southern Rural Water The Advisory Group consisted of: Ivan Sharp Irrigator Ian Vesey Irrigator Kevin Ferrari Irrigator Robert Maxwell Irrigator Terry Harris Irrigator Gavin Bone Irrigator Steve Theodore Recreational angler Chris Tipler Environment Victoria Peter Gstrein Southern Rural Water Jill Fleming on behalf of Ian Voigt Department of Sustainability and Environment Gary Summers on behalf of Darren Shiell Parks Victoria Troy Duthrie on behalf of Graeme Hannel Fisheries Victoria Denis Lovric Corangamite Catchment Management Authority Anne-Marie McCarthy on behalf of Environment Protection Authority Alexander Jovcic Page iii Recommendations_Final.doc July 2006 Assessment of Environmental Flow Requirements for the Gellibrand River – Recommendations Acronyms/Abbreviations Used in this report: BE Bulk water Entitlements CMA Catchment Management
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Victorian Historical Journal
    VICTORIAN HISTORICAL JOURNAL VOLUME 87, NUMBER 2, DECEMBER 2016 ROYAL HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF VICTORIA VICTORIAN HISTORICAL JOURNAL ROYAL HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF VICTORIA The Royal Historical Society of Victoria is a community organisation comprising people from many fields committed to collecting, researching and sharing an understanding of the history of Victoria. The Victorian Historical Journal is a fully refereed journal dedicated to Australian, and especially Victorian, history produced twice yearly by the Publications Committee, Royal Historical Society of Victoria. PUBLICATIONS COMMITTEE Jill Barnard Marilyn Bowler Richard Broome (Convenor) Marie Clark Mimi Colligan Don Garden (President, RHSV) Don Gibb David Harris (Editor, Victorian Historical Journal) Kate Prinsley Marian Quartly (Editor, History News) John Rickard Judith Smart (Review Editor) Chips Sowerwine Carole Woods BECOME A MEMBER Membership of the Royal Historical Society of Victoria is open. All those with an interest in history are welcome to join. Subscriptions can be purchased at: Royal Historical Society of Victoria 239 A’Beckett Street Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia Telephone: 03 9326 9288 Email: [email protected] www.historyvictoria.org.au Journals are also available for purchase online: www.historyvictoria.org.au/publications/victorian-historical-journal VICTORIAN HISTORICAL JOURNAL ISSUE 286 VOLUME 87, NUMBER 2 DECEMBER 2016 Royal Historical Society of Victoria Victorian Historical Journal Published by the Royal Historical Society of Victoria 239 A’Beckett Street Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia Telephone: 03 9326 9288 Fax: 03 9326 9477 Email: [email protected] www.historyvictoria.org.au Copyright © the authors and the Royal Historical Society of Victoria 2016 All material appearing in this publication is copyright and cannot be reproduced without the written permission of the publisher and the relevant author.
    [Show full text]
  • ASSESSMENT of the FISHERY for SNAPPER (Pagrus Auratus) in QUEENSLAND and NEW SOUTH WALES
    ASSESSMENT OF THE FISHERY FOR SNAPPER (Pagrus auratus) IN QUEENSLAND AND NEW SOUTH WALES Principal Investigators D. Ferrell and W. Sumpton FRDC 93/074 Final Report, FRDC Project 93/074 Assessment of the Snapper fishery in Qld and NSW 93/074 Assessment of the fishery for snapper (Pagrus auratus) in Queensland and NSW. PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS: Wayne Sumpton1 and Doug Ferrell2 ADDRESS: 1. QLD Department of Primary Industries Southern Fisheries Centre PO Box 76 DECEPTION BAY Q 4508 Telephone: 07 3817 9584 Fax: 07 3817 9584 ` 2. NSW Fisheries Research Institute 202 Nicholson Parade Cronulla NSW 2230 Telephone: 02 9527 8514 Fax: 02 9527 8576 OBJECTIVES To estimate the recreational snapper catch in the Moreton Region and evaluate methodologies for estimating offshore recreational effort. To provide fisheries managers with models for assessing the impact on yield of proposed changes to the legislated minimum legal size of snapper. To provide fisheries managers with information on the genetic relationship between snapper populations in south Queensland, Northern New South Wales and east of the Swains Reefs (Southern Great Barrier Reef). To develop methods of estimating relative abundance and year class strength of juvenile snapper. Queensland Department of Primary Industries 2 New South Wales Fisheries Research Institute Final Report, FRDC Project 93/074 Assessment of the Snapper fishery in Qld and NSW NON TECHNICAL SUMMARY Previous work to validate snapper age estimates was supported but this validation is still suspect in northern NSW and Queensland. The reason the validation is called into question is that the clarity of interpretation of otolith edges changed with latitude.
    [Show full text]
  • Seine River Temperature Project
    SEINE RIVER TEMPERATURE PROJECT A multi-year project designed to determine environmental and traditional ecological knowledge indicators for lake sturgeon spawning windows A Five-Year Summary of Work Conducted from 2011 to 2015 March 2016 Prepared by Ryan Haines, Kenora Resource Consultants Inc. for Seine River First Nation In Memory of Myron Johnson As a co-worker and friend…you will be missed. i Executive Summary In 1926, the Sturgeon Falls Generating Station was constructed along the Seine River to create hydroelectric power and this facility is currently operated by H2O Power. One of the major threats to lake sturgeon is the impact of peaking hydroelectric developments on the water levels during the spring spawning season. The purpose of the Seine River Temperature Project is to help define the spring spawn for Seine River sturgeon through surrogate environmental indicators and note any effects of peaking on spawning. In addition, a goal of the project was to determine if the increases in water levels at the Seine River First Nation community are due solely to the flow from the Seine River, or if the dam at the outlet of Rainy Lake affects the water levels resulting in the Seine River functioning as a reservoir. Between 2011 and 2015, Seine River First Nation community technicians studied the spawning timing of lake sturgeon at two important spawning sites in Seine River below the Sturgeon Falls dam to help determine the environmental indicators (temperature, photoperiod, flows) for lake sturgeon spawning. In addition, work was done with Seine River First Nation Elders and knowledge holders in the fall of 2012 to identify Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) indicators for lake sturgeon spawning in Seine River.
    [Show full text]
  • Governance of the Great Ocean Road Region Issues Paper
    Governance of the Great Ocean Road Region Issues Paper Governance of the GREAT OCEAN ROAD REGION Issues Paper i Dormant Tower Hill Volcano Over Moyjil - Point Ritchie 14 public entities Aboriginal site possibly up to 2/3 80,000 journeys are years old day trips Nearly 170,000 hectares of Crown land Up to 11,000 visitors Over a day to the 12 Apostles 200 shipwrecks 5.4m visitors spent $1.3b 2cm/yr generating the rate at which the cliffs are being eroded Traditional 2 Owner groups From 1846, the 12 Apostles were once known as limestone Traditional lands of “The Sow and Piglets” 7 stacks (out of Eastern Maar (western and the original 9), middle stretches) and the known as the Wadawurrung (eastern end) 12 Apostles B100 The Great Ocean Road 8.1m is the world’s visitors projected largest war Infographic In in the next memorial 2011 decade Added to the National Heritage List Rip Curl Pro at Bells Beach is the world’s longest running 2 surfing competition National Parks 24,000 Number of people in Lorne during the Pier to Pub (up from normal population of 1,000) 9,200 jobs 2 in the year 1983 Ash Wednesday bushfires destroyed Marine National ending June 2017 Parks 42,000 and 729 hectares houses 3 2015 Wye River bushfire destroyed Marine National Sanctuaries and Rare polar dinosaur 2,260 115 fossil sites hectares houses The Great Ocean Road Taskforce proudly acknowledges the Eastern Maar and Wadawurrung people as the traditional custodians of the Great Ocean Road Region1.
    [Show full text]
  • Rivers and Streams Special Investigation Final Recommendations
    LAND CONSERVATION COUNCIL RIVERS AND STREAMS SPECIAL INVESTIGATION FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS June 1991 This text is a facsimile of the former Land Conservation Council’s Rivers and Streams Special Investigation Final Recommendations. It has been edited to incorporate Government decisions on the recommendations made by Order in Council dated 7 July 1992, and subsequent formal amendments. Added text is shown underlined; deleted text is shown struck through. Annotations [in brackets] explain the origins of the changes. MEMBERS OF THE LAND CONSERVATION COUNCIL D.H.F. Scott, B.A. (Chairman) R.W. Campbell, B.Vet.Sc., M.B.A.; Director - Natural Resource Systems, Department of Conservation and Environment (Deputy Chairman) D.M. Calder, M.Sc., Ph.D., M.I.Biol. W.A. Chamley, B.Sc., D.Phil.; Director - Fisheries Management, Department of Conservation and Environment S.M. Ferguson, M.B.E. M.D.A. Gregson, E.D., M.A.F., Aus.I.M.M.; General Manager - Minerals, Department of Manufacturing and Industry Development A.E.K. Hingston, B.Behav.Sc., M.Env.Stud., Cert.Hort. P. Jerome, B.A., Dip.T.R.P., M.A.; Director - Regional Planning, Department of Planning and Housing M.N. Kinsella, B.Ag.Sc., M.Sci., F.A.I.A.S.; Manager - Quarantine and Inspection Services, Department of Agriculture K.J. Langford, B.Eng.(Ag)., Ph.D , General Manager - Rural Water Commission R.D. Malcolmson, M.B.E., B.Sc., F.A.I.M., M.I.P.M.A., M.Inst.P., M.A.I.P. D.S. Saunders, B.Agr.Sc., M.A.I.A.S.; Director - National Parks and Public Land, Department of Conservation and Environment K.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Victoria Government Gazette No
    Victoria Government Gazette No. S 126 Friday 5 May 2006 By Authority. Victorian Government Printer ROAD SAFETY (VEHICLES) REGULATIONS 1999 Class 2 Notice – Conditional Exemption of Heavier and Longer B-doubles with Road Friendly Suspension from Certain Mass Limits 1. Purpose To exempt certain class 2 vehicles from certain mass and dimension limits subject to complying with certain conditions. 2. Authorising provision This Notice is made under regulation 510 of the Road Safety (Vehicles) Regulations 1999. 3. Commencement This Notice comes into operation on the date of its publication in the Government Gazette. 4. Revocation The Notices published in Government Gazette No. S134 of 17 June 2004 and Government Gazette No. S236 of 25 November 2005 are revoked. 5. Expiration This Notice expires on 1 March 2011. 6. Definitions In this Notice – “Regulations” means the Road Safety (Vehicles) Regulations 1999. “road friendly suspension” has the same meaning as in the Interstate Road Transport Regulations 1986 of the Commonwealth. “Approval Plate” means a decal, label or plate issued by a Competent Entity that is made of a material and fixed in such a way that they cannot be removed without being damaged or destroyed and that contains at least the following information: (a) Manufacturer or Trade name or mark of the Front Underrun Protection Vehicle, or Front Underrun Protection Device, or prime mover in the case of cabin strength, or protrusion as appropriate; (b) In the case of a Front Underrun Protection Device or protrusion, the make of the vehicle or vehicles and the model or models of vehicle the component or device has been designed and certified to fit; (c) Competent Entity unique identification number; (d) In the case of a Front Underrun Protection Device or protrusion, the Approval Number issued by the Competent Entity; and (e) Purpose of the approval, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Maribyrnong River
    Environmental Flow Determination for the Maribyrnong River Final Recommendations Revision C July 2006 Environmental Flow Determination for the Maribyrnong River –Final Recommendations Environmental Flow Determination for the Maribyrnong River FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS L:\work\NRG\PROJECTS\2005\034 Maribyrnong E-flows\02\03 Recommendations Paper\Recommendations RevC.doc Document History: ISSUE REVISION AUTHOR CHECKED APPROVED DESCRIPTION DATE NUMBER Preliminary Draft 30.11.2005 A A Wealands C Arnott C Arnott for Comment Final Draft for 18.01.2006 B A Wealands C Arnott C Arnott Comment Inclusion of 31.01.2006 B1 A Wealands C Arnott C Arnott estuary recommendations 18.07.2006 C A Wealands C Arnott C Arnott Final Report Natural Resources Group Earth Tech Engineering Pty Ltd ABN 61 089 482 888 Head Office 71 Queens Road Melbourne VIC 3004 Tel +61 3 8517 9200 Environmental Flow Determination for the Maribyrnong River –Final Recommendations Contents Contents .................................................................................................................. i Tables....................................................................................................................... i 1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 4 Outline of this Report.............................................................................................5 The Maribyrnong River Catchment .......................................................................6 2 Environmental
    [Show full text]
  • Great Ocean Road Action Plan
    B100 GREAT OCEAN ROAD ACTION PLAN Protecting our iconic coast and parks Dormant Tower Hill Volcano 30 responsible organisations 8.6m visitors a year 2/3 within ten years journeys are day trips Nearly 170,000 hectares of Crown land Up to 12,000 visitors Over a day to the 12 Apostles 200 shipwrecks 5.8m visitors spent $1.3b 2cm/yr generating the rate at which the cliffs are being eroded From 1846, the 12 Apostles were once known as limestone “The Sow and Piglets” 7 stacks (out of the original 9), known as the 12 Apostles Great Ocean Road Action Plan Eastern Maar and B100 The Great Wadawurrung Ocean Road People have known is the world’s and cared for this largest war CountryInfographic for at least In 2011 memorial 35,000 Added to the years National Heritage List Rip Curl Pro at Bells Beach is the world’s longest running 2 surfing competition National Parks 24,000 Number of people in Lorne during the Pier to Pub (up from normal population of 1,100) 11,200 jobs 2 in the region in 1983 Ash Wednesday bushfires destroyed Marine National the year ending June 2017 Parks 42,000 and 729 hectares houses 3 2015 Wye River bushfire destroyed Marine National Sanctuaries and Rare polar dinosaur 2,260 115 fossil sites hectares houses Protecting our iconic coast and parks Purpose Acknowledgement This Action Plan is the Victorian Government’s response to the Great Ocean Road Taskforce Co-Chairs The Victorian Government proudly acknowledges the Report recommended reforms to Eastern Maar and Wadawurrung People as the traditional management arrangements of the custodians of the Great Ocean Road region.
    [Show full text]
  • Drought Impact on Fish Communities and River Health in the Corangamite Region
    Drought impact on fish communities and river health in the Corangamite Region An isolated pool in Painkalac Creek. Tom Ryan and John McGuckin Report prepared for Corangamite Catchment Management Authority August 2007 Drought impact on fish communities and river health in the Corangamite Region Executive Summary This study provides a rapid assessment of river condition and aims to determine the key issues affecting aquatic health including the relative impact of drought. It is designed to help prioritise potential management actions in the drought response plan. Pre-existing catchment issues, such as water extraction, extensive land clearing and lack of riparian vegetation can directly affect river health and compounds impacts caused directly by drought. Where catchments have been degraded by past management practices, the severity of the drought upon stream health has been the most extreme. Waters examined in this study have been classified into 3 distinct classes of river health, streams with minor stress, streams with moderate stress and streams that have severe stress. Waterways with minor drought stress had lower streamflows than normal as a result of the drought but were in no immediate threat of becoming severely stressed by the drought. Waters classified as having moderate stress are ones in which the existing aquatic fauna is expected to be experiencing some stress, however, the stress is unlikely to have caused the loss of species. Streamflow may have ceased in freshwater reaches and water deterioration may have occurred in remaining refuge habitat, however, the duration of the stress upon aquatic fauna has only been for a relatively short period.
    [Show full text]
  • The Journal of the Catfish Study Group
    Volume 15, Issue 3. September 2014 THE JOURNAL OF THE CATFISH STUDY GROUP Furthering the study of catfish Notes on Corydoras melanistius Convention 2014 Lecture notes Spawning Ancistrus sp. L183 Spawning Pseudacanthicus L114 Hopliancistrus – Haakon Haagensen National Catfish Championship Notes on Corydoras kanei and C. crimmeni What’s New? Catfish by Post Rhinelepis strigosa Volume 15, Issue 3. September 2014 Catfish Study Group Committee President – Ian Fuller Secretary – Ian Fuller [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Editor – Mark Walters Vice-President – Dr. Peter Burgess [email protected] Chairman – Bob Barnes BAP Secretary – Brian Walsh [email protected] [email protected] Treasurer – Danny Blundell Show Secretary – Brian Walsh [email protected] [email protected] Membership Secretary – Mike O’Sullivan Assistant Show Secretary – Ann Blundell [email protected] Website Manager – Allan James Auction Manager – David Barton [email protected] [email protected] Floor Member – Bill Hurst Assistant Auction Manager – Roy Barton [email protected] Scientific Advisor – Dr. Michael Hardman Diary Dates - 2014 Date Meeting Venue September 21st Annual Open Show and Auction Derwent Hall October 19th Discussion on ‘L’ numbers Derwent Hall November 16th Autumn auction Derwent Hall December 14th Christmas meeting Derwent Hall Monthly meetings are held on the third Sunday of each month except, where stated. Meetings start at 1.00 pm: Auctions, Open Show and Spring and Summer Lectures All Meeting are held at: Derwent Hall, George Street, Darwen, BB3 0DQ. The Annual Convention is held at The Kilhey Court Hotel, Chorley Road, Standish, Wigan, WN1 2XN. Volume 15, Issue 3. September 2014 Contents Editorial …………………..……………………………….…….……….......................................... 2 From the Chair …………………..……………………………….…….……….........................
    [Show full text]
  • Working Draft WAP for the Marne-Saunders PWRA
    Water Allocation Plan for the Marne Saunders Prescribed Water Resources Area Prepared by the South Australian Murray-Darling Basin Natural Resources Management Board 2010 ii Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Objectives of the Marne Saunders Water Allocation Plan ............................................ 1 1.2 Structure of the Plan .................................................................................................... 2 1.2.1 Supply and demand .............................................................................................. 2 1.2.2 Policy framework .................................................................................................. 2 1.2.3 Monitoring and evaluation ..................................................................................... 3 1.3 Allocation of water to existing users ............................................................................. 3 1.4 Legislative history of water regulation in the Marne Saunders ...................................... 3 2 Physical characteristics of the Marne Saunders PWRA ...................................................... 5 2.1 Landscape and geology ............................................................................................... 5 2.2 Climate ........................................................................................................................ 5 2.3 Prescribed water resources ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • V I F M & P V I F M & P
    VMPi VIICTORIAN NITIATIVE FMOR INERALS &P ETROLEUM HYDROCARBON P ROSPECTIVITY P ACKAGE F OR VIC/O-01(1), VIC/O-01(2) andVIC/O-01(3) , E ASTERN O NSHORE O TWAY B ASIN, VAICTORIA, USTRALIA: 2001 ACREAGE R ELEASE VIMP REPORT 70 A.E. CONSTANTINE N. LIBERMAN November 2001 KYNETON PEP160 BALLARAT AREA OF INTEREST HAMILTON MELBOURNE PEP151 PEP150 LARA PEP159 GEELONG VIC/O-01(1) VIC/O-01(3) PEP152 (b) COBDEN 200m COLAC PORTLAND PEP154(a) VIC/P46 1000m PEP153 VIC/O-01(2) VIC/P44 2000m 3000m VIC/P43 0 10 20 30 40 50 Km 4000m 2001 acreage release . VIMP Report 70 Hydrocarbon prospectivity package for VIC/O-01(1), VIC/O-01(2) and VIC/O-01(3), Eastern Onshore Otway Basin, Victoria, Australia 2001 Acreage Release A. Constantine and N. Liberman November 2001 Bibliographic reference: CONSTANTINE, A. and LIBERMAN, N., 2001. Hydrocarbon Prospectivity Package for VIC/O-01(1), VIC/O-01(2) and VIC/O-01(3), Eastern Onshore Otway Basin, Victoria, Australia. 2001 Acreage Release. Victorian Initiative for Minerals and Petroleum Report 70. Department of Natural Resources and Environment. © Crown (State of Victoria) Copyright 2001 Petroleum Development ISSN 1323 4536 ISBN 0 7306 9472 0 (Hard Copy) ISBN 0 7306 9473 9 (CD-ROM) This report may be purchased from: Business Centre Minerals & Petroleum Department of Natural Resources and Environment 8th Floor, 240 Victoria Parade East Melbourne, Victoria 3002, Australia For further technical information contact: Manager Petroleum Development Department of Natural Resources and Environment PO Box 500 East Melbourne, Victoria 3002, Australia Website: www.nre.vic.gov.au/minpet/index.htm Authorship and Acknowledgments: The package was compiled and collated by the Basin Studies Group of the Petroleum Development Unit.
    [Show full text]