DOCSLIB.ORG

Maribyrnong River

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Maribyrnong River Environmental Flow Determination for the Maribyrnong River Final Recommendations Revision C July 2006 Environmental Flow Determination for the Maribyrnong River –Final Recommendations Environmental Flow Determination for the Maribyrnong River FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS L:\work\NRG\PROJECTS\2005\034 Maribyrnong E-flows\02\03 Recommendations Paper\Recommendations RevC.doc Document History: ISSUE REVISION AUTHOR CHECKED APPROVED DESCRIPTION DATE NUMBER Preliminary Draft 30.11.2005 A A Wealands C Arnott C Arnott for Comment Final Draft for 18.01.2006 B A Wealands C Arnott C Arnott Comment Inclusion of 31.01.2006 B1 A Wealands C Arnott C Arnott estuary recommendations 18.07.2006 C A Wealands C Arnott C Arnott Final Report Natural Resources Group Earth Tech Engineering Pty Ltd ABN 61 089 482 888 Head Office 71 Queens Road Melbourne VIC 3004 Tel +61 3 8517 9200 Environmental Flow Determination for the Maribyrnong River –Final Recommendations Contents Contents .................................................................................................................. i Tables....................................................................................................................... i 1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 4 Outline of this Report.............................................................................................5 The Maribyrnong River Catchment .......................................................................6 2 Environmental Flow Analysis....................................................................... 7 2.1 Surveys of selected reaches ........................................................................7 2.2 Hydraulic and Hydrologic Modelling ...........................................................7 2.2.1 Representativeness of the Model .......................................................................... 9 2.2.2 Hydraulic Model Sensitivity Assessment and Analysis ........................................ 10 2.3 Rates of Rise and Fall.................................................................................12 3 Reach Recommendations........................................................................... 13 4 Estuary Recommendations ........................................................................ 61 5 Supporting Recommendations .................................................................. 66 6 Conclusion .................................................................................................. 67 7 References................................................................................................... 68 Tables Table 2-1 Upper and lower error limits for a 25% change in boundary conditions at the same water elevation for the recommended low flow and bankfull flow. ....11 Table 2-2 Recommended maximum rates of rise and fall (expressed as a percentage of the previous days flow) for all reaches of the Maribyrnong River catchment. ......................................................................................................12 Table 3-1 Flow Processes and Flow Components for Reach One – Deep Creek Upper Catchment ............................................................................................15 Table 3-2. Flow Recommendations for Reach One – Deep Creek Upper Catchment ........................................................................................................................18 Table 3-3 Comparison of Flow Recommendations to Current and Natural Flow Regimes – Reach One....................................................................................18 Table 3-4 Flow Processes and Flow Components for Reach Two – Deep Creek Mid Catchment.......................................................................................................20 Table 3-5. Flow Recommendations for Reach Two – Deep Creek Mid Catchment 23 Table 3-6 Comparison of Flow Recommendations to Current and Natural Flow Regimes – Reach Two ....................................................................................23 Page i Recommendations RevC.doc July 2006 Rev C Environmental Flow Determination for the Maribyrnong River –Final Recommendations Table 3-7 Flow Processes and Flow Components for Reach Three – Emu Creek.25 Table 3-8. Flow Recommendations for Reach Three – Emu Creek .......................27 Table 3-9 Comparison of Flow Recommendations to Current and Natural Flow Regimes – Reach Three .................................................................................27 Table 3-10 Flow Processes and Flow Components for Reach 4 – Deep Creek Lower Catchment ............................................................................................29 Table 3-11. Flow Recommendations for Reach Four – Deep Creek Lower Catchment.......................................................................................................32 Table 3-12 Comparison of Flow Recommendations to Current and Natural Flow Regimes – Reach Four ...................................................................................32 Table 3-13 Flow Processes and Flow Components for Reach 5 – Riddells Creek.35 Table 3-14. Flow Recommendations for Reach Five – Riddells Creek ..................38 Table 3-15 Comparison of Flow Recommendations to Current and Natural Flow Regimes – Reach Five....................................................................................39 Table 3-16 Flow Processes and Flow Components for Reach Six – Jacksons Creek Upper Catchment ............................................................................................41 Table 3-17. Flow Recommendations for Reach Six – Jacksons Creek Upper Catchment.......................................................................................................44 Table 3-18 Comparison of Flow Recommendations to Current Flow Regime – Reach Six........................................................................................................46 Table 3-19 Flow Processes and Flow Components for Reach 7 – Jacksons Creek Lower Catchment ............................................................................................49 Table 3-20. Flow Recommendations for Reach Seven – Jacksons Creek Lower Catchment.......................................................................................................52 Table 3-21 Comparison of Flow Recommendations to Current Flow Regime – Reach Seven...................................................................................................53 Table 3-22 Flow Processes and Flow Components for Reach 8 – Maribyrnong River Freshwater Reach..................................................................................56 Table 3-23. Flow Recommendations for Reach Eight – Maribyrnong River Freshwater Reach...........................................................................................59 Table 3-24 Comparison of Flow Recommendations to Current and Natural Flow Regimes – Reach Eight...................................................................................60 Please cite this document as: Earth Tech (2006) Environmental Flow Determination for the Maribyrnong – Draft Final Recommendations Paper . Unpublished Report to Melbourne Water Corporation by the Maribyrnong River Environmental Water Requirements Technical Panel. Page ii Recommendations RevC.doc July 2006 Rev C Environmental Flow Determination for the Maribyrnong River –Final Recommendations Acknowledgements: The Maribyrnong River Environmental Water Requirements Technical Panel (the Technical Panel) consists of (in alphabetical order, with fields of expertise): Michael Aberton Riparian vegetation Chris Arnott Chair of the technical panel Tim Doeg Macroinvertebrate ecology and Fish Brian Finlayson Geomorphology Jeremy Hindell Estuarine processes Geoff Vietz Hydrology and Hydraulic modelling The Earth Tech project management team consists of: Chris Arnott Project Manager Amanda Wealands Project Support The Technical Panel wishes to acknowledge the assistance of Christine Hughes (MW) and the Steering Committee and Advisory Group for their assistance in this phase of the project. The Steering Committee for the project consisted of: Jamie Ewert Melbourne Water Corporation Paul Louws Western Water Phil Mitchell Department of Sustainability and the Environment Cameron Welsh Southern Rural Water The Advisory Group consisted of: Arnie Azaris Sunbury Conservation Society Wade Bland Hume City Council David Blicblau Deep Creek Landcare Christina Cheers Friends of Emu Bottom Reserve Garrett Hall EPA Gary Lawes MW Diverter Lachlan Milne Shire of Macedon Ranges Bill Mole SRW Diverter John Robinson Port Phillip and Westernport Catchment Management Authority Chris Ryan SRW Diverter Leon Stackpole EPA Fiona Stevens Department of Sustainability and the Environment (Coast Action Coast Care) Ian Sutherland Friends of Emu Bottom Reserve Ian Taylor Sunbury Landcare Zoe Thomson Brimbank City Council Eddie Tsyrlin Melbourne Water Page i Recommendations RevC.doc July 2006 Rev C Environmental Flow Determination for the Maribyrnong River –Final Recommendations Acronyms/Abbreviations used in this report: CRC Co-operative Research Centre DSE Department of Sustainability and Environment EVC Ecological Vegetation Class EWR Environmental Water Requirements FLOWS The “Statewide Method for Determining Environmental Water Requirements” IFU Internal Floodplain Unit LWD Large Woody Debris MW Melbourne Water Corporation Technical
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rivers Monitoring and Evaluation Plan V1.0 2020
    i Rivers Monitoring and Evaluation Plan V1.0 2020 Contents Acknowledgement to Country ................................................................................................ 1 Contributors ........................................................................................................................... 1 Abbreviations and acronyms .................................................................................................. 2 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 3 Background and context ........................................................................................................ 3 About the Rivers MEP ............................................................................................................. 7 Part A: PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES ..................................................................................... 18 Habitat ................................................................................................................................. 24 Vegetation ............................................................................................................................ 29 Engaged communities .......................................................................................................... 45 Community places ................................................................................................................ 54 Water for the environment ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Fire Dynamics of Cool Temperate Rainforest in the O'shannassy Catchment
    Post-fire dynamics of Cool Temperate Rainforest in the O’Shannassy Catchment A. Tolsma, R. Hale, G. Sutter and M. Kohout July 2019 Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Technical Report Series No. 298 Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning PO Box 137 Heidelberg, Victoria 3084 Phone (03) 9450 8600 Website: www.ari.vic.gov.au Citation: Tolsma, A., Hale, R., Sutter, G. and Kohout, M. (2019). Post-fire dynamics of Cool Temperate Rainforest in the O’Shannassy Catchment. Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Technical Report Series No. 298. Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, Heidelberg, Victoria. Front cover photo: Small stand of Cool Temperate Rainforest grading to Cool Temperate Mixed Forest with fire-killed Mountain Ash, O’Shannassy Catchment, East Central Highlands (Arn Tolsma). © The State of Victoria Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning 2019 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. You are free to re-use the work under that licence, on the condition that you credit the State of Victoria as author. The licence does not apply to any images, photographs or branding, including the Victorian Coat of Arms, the Victorian Government logo, the Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning logo and the Arthur Rylah Institute logo. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en Printed by Melbourne Polytechnic Printroom ISSN 1835-3827 (Print) ISSN 1835-3835 (pdf/online/MS word) ISBN 978-1-76077-589-6 (Print) ISBN 978-1-76077-590-2 (pdf/online/MS word) Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • ASSESSMENT of the FISHERY for SNAPPER (Pagrus Auratus) in QUEENSLAND and NEW SOUTH WALES
    ASSESSMENT OF THE FISHERY FOR SNAPPER (Pagrus auratus) IN QUEENSLAND AND NEW SOUTH WALES Principal Investigators D. Ferrell and W. Sumpton FRDC 93/074 Final Report, FRDC Project 93/074 Assessment of the Snapper fishery in Qld and NSW 93/074 Assessment of the fishery for snapper (Pagrus auratus) in Queensland and NSW. PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS: Wayne Sumpton1 and Doug Ferrell2 ADDRESS: 1. QLD Department of Primary Industries Southern Fisheries Centre PO Box 76 DECEPTION BAY Q 4508 Telephone: 07 3817 9584 Fax: 07 3817 9584 ` 2. NSW Fisheries Research Institute 202 Nicholson Parade Cronulla NSW 2230 Telephone: 02 9527 8514 Fax: 02 9527 8576 OBJECTIVES To estimate the recreational snapper catch in the Moreton Region and evaluate methodologies for estimating offshore recreational effort. To provide fisheries managers with models for assessing the impact on yield of proposed changes to the legislated minimum legal size of snapper. To provide fisheries managers with information on the genetic relationship between snapper populations in south Queensland, Northern New South Wales and east of the Swains Reefs (Southern Great Barrier Reef). To develop methods of estimating relative abundance and year class strength of juvenile snapper. Queensland Department of Primary Industries 2 New South Wales Fisheries Research Institute Final Report, FRDC Project 93/074 Assessment of the Snapper fishery in Qld and NSW NON TECHNICAL SUMMARY Previous work to validate snapper age estimates was supported but this validation is still suspect in northern NSW and Queensland. The reason the validation is called into question is that the clarity of interpretation of otolith edges changed with latitude.
    [Show full text]
  • Seine River Temperature Project
    SEINE RIVER TEMPERATURE PROJECT A multi-year project designed to determine environmental and traditional ecological knowledge indicators for lake sturgeon spawning windows A Five-Year Summary of Work Conducted from 2011 to 2015 March 2016 Prepared by Ryan Haines, Kenora Resource Consultants Inc. for Seine River First Nation In Memory of Myron Johnson As a co-worker and friend…you will be missed. i Executive Summary In 1926, the Sturgeon Falls Generating Station was constructed along the Seine River to create hydroelectric power and this facility is currently operated by H2O Power. One of the major threats to lake sturgeon is the impact of peaking hydroelectric developments on the water levels during the spring spawning season. The purpose of the Seine River Temperature Project is to help define the spring spawn for Seine River sturgeon through surrogate environmental indicators and note any effects of peaking on spawning. In addition, a goal of the project was to determine if the increases in water levels at the Seine River First Nation community are due solely to the flow from the Seine River, or if the dam at the outlet of Rainy Lake affects the water levels resulting in the Seine River functioning as a reservoir. Between 2011 and 2015, Seine River First Nation community technicians studied the spawning timing of lake sturgeon at two important spawning sites in Seine River below the Sturgeon Falls dam to help determine the environmental indicators (temperature, photoperiod, flows) for lake sturgeon spawning. In addition, work was done with Seine River First Nation Elders and knowledge holders in the fall of 2012 to identify Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) indicators for lake sturgeon spawning in Seine River.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecting the Bendigo Region to Melbourne Airport
    Connecting the Bendigo region to Melbourne Airport For the first time passengers along the Bendigo Line will be able to catch a train to Melbourne Airport, with a single interchange at Sunshine Station. Bendigo Kangaroo Flat Harcourt To and from Melbourne Airport Bendigo Castlemaine — Seamless interchange between V/Line and airport services at Sunshine. KangarooMalmsbury Flat — Trains running from Sunshine to Melbourne KynetonHarcourt Airport every 10 minutes. CastlemaineWoodend — Easy access for interstate and international Macedon visitors, with a journey time from Melbourne Malmsbury Airport to Bendigo of around two hours. Gisborne Kyneton Melbourne Riddells Creek Airport ClarkefieldWoodend To CBD SunburyMacedon via Metro Tunnel WatergardensGisborne Melbourne Riddells Creek Sunshine Southern Airport Clarkefield Cross To CBD Sunbury via Metro Tunnel Legend Watergardens Melbourne Airport Rail Sunbury, Cranbourne and Pakenham (Metro Tunnel) Sunshine Southern Regional connections Cross Project timeline Legend Further engagementMelbourne Airport and detailed Rail planningSunbury, and development Cranbourne and Pakenham (Metro Tunnel) Regional connections 2020 onwards 2020-2021 2022 2029 Community and Statutory planning Construction Target stakeholder approval process commencement* opening engagement Market engagement date* Business case and Procurement process design development *Subject to relevant Victorian and Federal planning, environmental and other government approvals. About Melbourne Airport Rail Melbourne Airport Rail The Australian and Victorian The final project budget will be governments have agreed that confirmed once all major contracts is a transformational Melbourne Airport Rail will run on are awarded, with construction to public transport project dedicated, new tracks from a new begin in 2022 and a target opening premium station at Melbourne date for Melbourne Airport Rail connecting Melbourne Airport to Sunshine Station, where of 2029.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wolfram Mine at Wilks Creek, Victoria by PETER S
    Journal of Australasian Mining History, Vol. 13, October 2015 The Wolfram Mine at Wilks Creek, Victoria By PETER S. EVANS ungsten, a hard, steel-grey metal is an important strategic commodity. Historic uses included textile printing and the production of hard alloys for engineering T purposes. In the twentieth century it was an essential element in the heavy manufacturing and armaments industry, and was also used in incandescent lamps, radio valves, electric furnaces, and spark plugs. Steels alloyed with tungsten are especially hard and fine-grained and retain their working properties at high temperatures. The principle ores of tungsten are scheelite and wolframite. Scheelite (calcium tungstate, CaWO4) is a tetragonal crystalline ore named after its discoverer Carl Wilhelm Scheele, a Swedish chemist. Wolframite (a mixture of ferrous tungstate, FeWO4; and manganese tungstate, MnWO4) has a monoclinic crystal structure and takes its name from the early word for tungsten, wolfram.1 Both of these minerals occur worldwide but more than 75 per cent of current world production comes from China.2 The existence of tungsten ores in Victoria was well known by 1869. Wolframite was noted in association with gold reefs at Sandhurst (Bendigo), Smythesdale, Tarrengower and in the basin of the River Yarra.3 Contemporary values for the mineral in England were from £5 to £6 per ton ‘at grass’. A method of refining the ore was known but, with the mining industry in Victoria largely focussed on gold production, little was done to exploit this resource.4 Towards the end of the nineteenth century, industrialised European nations showed an interest in buying Australian ores of tungsten, with well-dressed scheelite fetching £30 or more per ton on the European market.
    [Show full text]
  • Riddells Creek Town Structure Plan Issues Paper Introduction Planning
    Riddells Creek Town Structure Plan Issues Paper Introduction Macedon Ranges Shire Council is preparing a new Town Structure Plan for Riddells Creek. This is a major plan that will shape the future growth and development of the town through to the year 2036. The preparation of the Riddells Creek Town Structure Plan is a Council Plan indicator for the 2012-13 financial year. Council has prepared an Issues Paper to inform the Structure Plan process. The Issues Paper is a consultation tool and does not purport to be a definite list of all issues or rank issues in terms or importance. Issues that are similar or relate to a specific topic are grouped under broad headings such as Transport. The purpose of the Issues Paper is to give the community an understanding of the types of issues that can be considered and help shape the preparation of a Draft Town Structure Plan. Comments received will assist Council in gaining an understanding of the issues that are important to the community and will feed into the preparation of a project brief to guide the process of preparing a Town Structure Plan. Planning The Macedon Ranges Settlement Strategy 2011 recommends growth of Riddells Creek from a current population of 3,500 to a population of 6,100 people in 2036. The justification for the recommended level of growth is based on the existing railway infrastructure and the level of community facilities. However, Riddells Creek currently has limited local employment opportunities and lacks some of the infrastructure that might be expected to deliver a sustainable town.
    [Show full text]
  • BENDIGO EC U 0 10 Km
    Lake Yando Pyramid Hill Murphy Swamp July 2018 N Lake Lyndger Moama Boort MAP OF THE FEDERAL Little Lake Boort Lake BoortELECTORAL DIVISION OF Echuca Woolshed Swamp MITIAMO RD H CA BENDIGO EC U 0 10 km Strathallan Y RD W Prairie H L O Milloo CAMPASPE D D I D M O A RD N Timmering R Korong Vale Y P Rochester Lo d d o n V Wedderburn A Tandarra N L R Greens Lake L E E M H IDLAND Y ek T HWY Cre R O Corop BENDIGO Kamarooka East N R Elmore Lake Cooper i LODDON v s N H r e W e O r Y y r Glenalbyn S M e Y v i Kurting N R N E T Bridgewater on Y Inglewood O W H Loddon G N I Goornong O D e R N D N p C E T A LA s L B ID a H D M p MALLEE E E R m R Derby a Huntly N NICHOLLS Bagshot C H Arnold Leichardt W H Y GREATER BENDIGO W Y WIMM Marong Llanelly ERA HWY Moliagul Newbridge Bendigo M Murphys CIVOR Tarnagulla H Creek WY Redcastle STRATHBOGIE Strathfieldsaye Knowsley Laanecoorie Reservoir Lockwood Shelbourne South Derrinal Dunolly Eddington Bromley Ravenswood BENDIGO Lake Eppalock Heathcote Tullaroop Creek Ravenswood South Argyle C Heathcote South A L D locality boundary E Harcourt R CENTRAL GOLDFIELDS Maldon Cairn Curran Dairy Flat Road Reservoir MOUNT ALEXANDER Redesdale Maryborough PYRENEES Tooborac Castlemaine MITCHELL Carisbrook HW F Y W Y Moolort Joyces Creek Campbells Chewton Elphinstone J Creek Pyalong o Newstead y c Strathlea e s Taradale Talbot Benloch locality MACEDON Malmsbury boundary Caralulup C RANGES re k ek e re Redesdale Junction C o Kyneton Pastoria locality boundary o r a BALLARAT g Lancefield n a Clunes HEPBURN K Woodend Pipers Creek
    [Show full text]
  • Central Region
    Section 3 Central Region 49 3.1 Central Region overview .................................................................................................... 51 3.2 Yarra system ....................................................................................................................... 53 3.3 Tarago system .................................................................................................................... 58 3.4 Maribyrnong system .......................................................................................................... 62 3.5 Werribee system ................................................................................................................. 66 3.6 Moorabool system .............................................................................................................. 72 3.7 Barwon system ................................................................................................................... 77 3.7.1 Upper Barwon River ............................................................................................... 77 3.7.2 Lower Barwon wetlands ........................................................................................ 77 50 3.1 Central Region overview 3.1 Central Region overview There are six systems that can receive environmental water in the Central Region: the Yarra and Tarago systems in the east and the Werribee, Maribyrnong, Moorabool and Barwon systems in the west. The landscape Community considerations The Yarra River flows west from the Yarra Ranges
    [Show full text]
  • Aboriginal Heritage Impact Assessment Lancefield Road Precinct Structure Plan 1075 Sunbury, Victoria
    Aboriginal Heritage Impact Assessment Lancefield Road Precinct Structure Plan 1075 Sunbury, Victoria Report Prepared for Metropolitan Planning Authority August 2015 Matt Chamberlain Executive Summary This report presents the results of an Aboriginal heritage impact assessment of a Precinct Structure Plan areas – PSP 1075 – situated at Sunbury, just north of Melbourne. The area is known as the Lancefield Road PSP (1075), covering an area of 1100 hectares on the east and north eastern side of Sunbury. The location of the study area is shown in Map 1. The purpose of the study is to provide findings and advice with regard to the Aboriginal heritage values of the PSP area. As part of this a range of tasks were outlined by Metropolitan Planning Authority, including: • Identifying the location of known Aboriginal sites (within 10 km radius of the PSP) and any natural features in the landscape that remain places of cultural importance today; • Collecting, documenting and reviewing oral histories and Aboriginal cultural values relating to the precinct; • Identifying Areas or landforms which are likely to be of high, medium and low cultural heritage sensitivity; • Identifying locations that are considered to be significantly disturbed as defined by the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006; • Undertaking an archaeological field survey with the Registered Aboriginal Party (RAP) (the Wurundjeri Tribe Land and Compensation Cultural Heritage Council Incorporated) to locate known and anticipated Aboriginal places within the precinct, with particular focus directed
    [Show full text]
  • Governance Issues in Developing and Implementing Offsets for Water Management Benefits: Can Preliminary Evaluation Guide Implementation Effectiveness? David L
    Focus Article Governance issues in developing and implementing offsets for water management benefits: Can preliminary evaluation guide implementation effectiveness? David L. Feldman,1∗ Ashmita Sengupta,2 Lindsey Stuvick,3 Eric Stein,2 Vin Pettigrove4 and Meenakshi Arora5 This article explores governance issues in developing innovative pollutant offset programs by focusing on a case study being piloted at the Gisborne Recycled Water Plant in Jackson Creek, a rural subcatchment of the Maribyrnong River north of Melbourne, Australia. The article offers preliminary lessons from the ongoing design and anticipated challenges facing this innovative program based on reflec- tions from the literature and project progress to-date. This case exemplifies a form of adaptive governance—an approach well suited to achieving broad sustainabil- ity objectives—and for which an early assessment is both appropriate and oppor- tune. Adaptive governance is characterized by governmental collaboration with civil society groups, social learning through public participation, and experimen- tation leading to more flexible policy outcomes. Early assessment affords the pos- sibility of midcourse corrections, drawing on experience acquired elsewhere. We contend that the approach being developed in Victoria through this pilot program has implications beyond the use of recycled wastewater for achieving various social objectives. It may also contribute to the development of an expansive water quality offset framework applicable to point source discharges, nonpoint source pollution, and sewerage overspills. Moreover, the approach can be applied to design of off- set systems elsewhere—with appropriate economic savings and effective applica- tion to multiple water quality challenges if potential problems are discerned early. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Map of Region
    A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T Daylesford & Hepburn Springs r t - Street Index Maldon Harc ou A 300 Redesdale Places of Interest Map of Region Mar ybor ough Cairn C 282 1 Curran Pyrenees Hwy Homebush Reservoir Castlemaine 6 Anderson’s Mill G6 First St F8 Hospital St H12 7 Blackwood Spring L8 Second St F7 Houston St H15, J15 Carisbr Craigieook Welshmans Third St F7 Howe St H13 Reef 8 Daylesford Cemetary J6 Fourth St F7 Ingrow Ln G10 Avoca B 180 Chewt on tElphins one Fifth St E7 Isset St I 18 B 180 Metcalfe 9 Firth Park M7 2 B 180 Pyalong Sixth St E6 Jamieson St H11 A 300 10 Hanging Rock P6 Seventh St E6 Jubilee Lake Rd H18 Bung Bong Tullaroop Green Eighth St E5 Kidds Gully Rd H9 New st ead 11 Kingston Avenue of Honour G6 Reservoir Gully Ninth St E5 Strathlea Yapeen King St G15 Fryerstown Taradale Tenth St E5 Knox St J12 C 287 Strangways Vaughn 12 Leitches Creek Spring K6 Eleventh St E4 Lake Rd H17 Lost Children’s Monument J6 Guildf or d 13 Twelfth St D4 Lakeside Dr E5 Sandon C 794 C C 326 3 a Fourteenth St D4 l 14 Lyonville Spring K6 Langdon Crt E12 Talbot d e y Fifteenth St D4 Leggatt St F16 C 283 r w F Clydesdale Malmsbur y w 15 Mt Beckworth D5 H Sixteenth St C3 Little St H11 y d n 16 Mt Franklin J4 Seventeenth St C3 Lone Pine Ave F3 Ctampbell own a l d Eighteenth St C3 Caralulup Yandoit i Lyman St K17 Dunach M 17 Newlyn Reservoir H7 Nineteenth St C2 Main Rd C2 Drummond 4 Burnbank 18 Sailors Falls Mineral Spring I6 Twentieth St C2 Malmsbury Rd J12 C 287 Franklinford Lauriston Cobaw Ajax Rd C5 Macadam St G16 C 316 19 Trentham
    [Show full text]