DOCSLIB.ORG

Isamaa Stands for Estonian Interests Isamaa Programme for the European Parliament Elections

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Isamaa Stands for Estonian Interests Isamaa Programme for the European Parliament Elections ISAMAA STANDS FOR ESTONIAN INTERESTS ISAMAA PROGRAMME FOR THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ELECTIONS 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS BASIC PRINCIPLES 3 ISAMAA PROTECTS IN EUROPE 4 1. LESS BUREAUCRACY 5 2. ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND JOBS 5 2.1 Common market 7 2.2 Financial policy 7 2.3 Regulaons promong entrepreneurship 8 2.4 Research and development acvies 9 2.5 Digital Europe 9 2.6 Infrastructure and transport connecons 10 3. ENERGY POLICY 11 4. FUTURE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION 12 5. EDUCATION AND YOUTH 13 6. DEFENCE POLICY 14 7. EUROPEAN GOVERNANCE 15 8. AGRICULTURE AND FISHERY 15 9. ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY 17 10. INTERNAL SECURITY AND IMMIGRATION POLICY 17 11. SOCIAL POLICY 20 11.1 Labour market and social protecon 20 11.2 Health care 21 12. FOREIGN POLICY 22 12.1 United States of America 23 12.2 Asia 23 12.3 Russia 23 12.4 Partnerships with the neighbours of the European Union and third countries. 24 !2 BASIC PRINCIPLES ISAMAA PROTECTS EUROPE OF INDEPENDENT COUNTRIES We see the European Union as the union of states, not as the state union. For Isamaa the European Union is based on the European values, Chrisan tradion and enlightenment ideals that should be preserved. Europe can be successful and sustainable only if it could maintain its unity and address the challenges it faces. The persistence and cooperaon of the European Union of naon states is also the best guarantor of security and prosperity for Estonia. ISAMAA PROTECTS THE EUROPEAN WAY OF LIFE AND CULTURAL HERITAGE The European uniqueness lies in rich cultural heritage, shared history and common Chrisan roots combined with different naonal peculiaries and tradions. Radical Islamism, uncontrolled immigraon, risk of terror and authoritarian governance are a threat to the foundaons of the European way of life. European identy, way of life and common tradions should be protected. ISAMAA PROTECTS THE FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION By protecng the European values and stable sociees, we should not set limits to the freedom of expression. We stand for the freedom of expression. ISAMAA PROTECTS AGAINST THE RECURRENCE OF THE PAST If you do not remember your past, you can never build a future – the crimes of Communism and Nazism should be equalized. !3 ISAMAA PROTECTS IN EUROPE … Estonian na9onal interests. The Estonian representaves should dare to stand just for the Estonian viewpoints in creang the European common posions. The European praccal cooperaon is necessary in the interests of Estonia, thus Estonia should be influenal and not to fear to represent its interests. … interests of naNon states. We see European Union as the union of sovereign naNon states, not as state union. We do not support the changing of the treaes for restricng the competences of the member states. Centralizaon is not a soluon. Soluon is a cooperaon of equal states. … right to decide independently upon migraNon issues. The European borders should prevent illegal migraon. … equal rights of the Estonian people to study, travel and work in Europe. … more effecve European Union. We are opposed to unnecessary bureaucracy. Together with the partners from the European People`s Party we cancel 1000 bureaucrac rules that restrict our entrepreneurship. … more efficient defence cooperaNon between the countries of the European Union For that purpose we support cooperaon with the USA, exclusion of Russia`s aggression with sancons, NATO membership of all countries of the European Union and coordinated and supported development of the member states of the European Union. … development of fair free market of goods and services. The Estonian entrepreneurs should have an access to the markets of other countries and the income of our people should increase. … preservaNon of the value space to protect the way of life established by the history of naNons. For that purpose it is essenal to control immigraon, honour tradions, value European cultural and intelligent heritage and pass it on to the future generaons. … more efficient cooperaNon in the economic interests of the European countries. This is presumed in energy, transport as well as innovaon and roboc sectors and in development of digital technology to make Europe globally more compeve. … regionally more consistent development of Estonia. We prefer to channel the funds of the European Union foremost outside Tallinn and to the rural districts to ensure the more even development of Estonia. !4 1. LESS BUREAUCRACY The rules of the European Union should be simplified. The simpler rules are easier to understand, improve legal certainty, prevent the misuse of the funds of the European Union and decrease bureaucracy. Isamaa considers it important... • to improve and simplify the rules for grants of the European Union to ensure the targeted investment of funds. • to harmonise the rules for the support funds of the European Union to make the applicaon process more consistent and comprehensive. • to create more flexibility to the cohesion policy programmes to combine the financing of the objects of the member states easier with the European Union support measures. • to raonalise the provisions regulang the control of means of the funds of the European Union and project management so that the scope of control in case of lower risk for misuse of means can be decreased at the level of the member state as well as European Commission. • to simplify the mechanisms for the receipt of support amounts and reporng in order to decrease the administrave burden of applicants. • to implement electronic project applicaon through the exisng public registries to decrease the follow-up control of applicaons and save the administrave resource. • to simplify and enhance cooperaon between the member states in implementaon of the cross-border projects. • decrease of bureaucracy related to e-commerce. 2. ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND JOBS The key issue in Estonia as well as Europe is how to create well-paid jobs and ensure beLer incoMe. We cannot increase incoMe of the people pursuant to order, but we can create more favourable business environment. Strong and prosperous European econoMic area is one of the presump9ons of security, thus this an important polical aim for us too. The European Union should have an open and efficient coMMon market without restricons that is created for entrepreneurship. We should favour and protect free coMpe99on and develop the spirit of business which is a precondion for well-paid jobs. !5 Isamaa considers it important… • decrease of proteconism that is common in the member states of the European Union. The closure of markets is not a soluon for the European economic problems, but impairs the long-term compeveness. To favour trade, it is essenal to eliminate the invisible market barriers between the member states. • full implementaon of the Services Direcve of the European Union. The European Commission should map the problems that currently hinder the provision of cross-border services and provide soluons. • close cooperaon with the Estonian business associaons to ensure the protecon of interests and trust of entrepreneurs in the European Union and other markets. • enforcement of the rules of common market also in online commerce. • reaching of the Estonian companies to the top of internaonal value chain. The economic growth should be based on the new knowledge and skills, thus we support knowledge-based development projects, wish to deal with business, internaonal cooperaon projects, fair compeon and low taxes. • greater financing opportunies for innovave small and medium-sized companies so that they could develop economic models of new generaon. • dealing with eliminaon of differences hindering the acve sale of cross- border goods and provision of services in sale and consumer law, copyright, data protecon rules, company law and tax law. • to connue the development of the EU company law which facilitates the transboundary movement of companies. The single legal area should be created at the level of the European Union which would enable to transfer the company established in one member state to another without involving an obligaon to liquidate the company in the desnaon country of the company and re-establish it in the target country. • as uniform rules and consumer rights as possible established for the sales law, provision of goods and services in the whole European Union to increase consumer confidence. This favours the development of e-commerce and thus expands the possibilies of the entrepreneurs in markeng their goods and services. • take advantage of the opportunies of new business models. The entrepreneurs of the European Union should be able to apply innovave ideas as easy as possible. The new business models should involve digital soluons simplifying the tax collecon. • to set the implementaon of innovave-friendly internal market as an objecve. For that purpose the hindrances of innovaon should be specified and removed from the legal acts of the European Union as well as keep the reasonability principle in mind in their take-over. !6 2.1 CoMMon market Our aim is the well-opera9ng coMMon market. The laLer can be achieved by as free Movement of services, goods and labour as possible. The sectors deserving priority aLen9on involve health, private security services, social services, banking and coMMunica9on services. Isamaa considers it important… • expansion of the scope of the Services Direcve to several sectors (e.g. health care services, gambling, provision of security services etc), in case of which the interests of entrepreneurs exist towards the foundaon of the companies in another member state as well as the provision of cross-border services. • loss of unjusfied restricons from the free movement of health care services and detailed noficaon of the paents and the public in the topic of cross- border health care services. To favour the provision of cross-border health care services and movement of paents the transnaonal digital data exchange capability should be improved.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article
    5 Comment & Analysis CE JISS 2008 Czech Presidential Elections: A Commentary Petr Just Again after fi ve years, the attention of the Czech public and politicians was focused on the Presidential elections, one of the most important milestones of 2008 in terms of Czech political developments. The outcome of the last elections in 2003 was a little surprising as the candidate of the Civic Democratic Party (ODS), Václav Klaus, represented the opposition party without the necessary majority in both houses of Parliament. Instead, the ruling coalition of the Czech Social Democratic Party (ČSSD), the Christian-Democratic Union – Czecho- slovak Peoples Party (KDU-ČSL), and the Union of Freedom – Democratic Union (US-DEU), accompanied by some independent and small party Senators was able – just mathematically – to elect its own candidate. However, a split in the major coalition party ČSSD, and support given to Klaus by the Communist Party of Bohemia and Moravia (KSČM), brought the Honorary Chairman of the ODS, Václav Klaus, to the Presidential offi ce. In February 2007, on the day of the forth anniversary of his fi rst elec- tion, Klaus announced that he would seek reelection in 2008. His party, the ODS, later formally approved his nomination and fi led his candidacy later in 2007. Klaus succeeded in his reelection attempt, but the way to defending the Presidency was long and complicated. In 2003 members of both houses of Parliament, who – according to the Constitution of the Czech Republic – elect the President at the Joint Session, had to meet three times before they elected the President, and each attempt took three rounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Cultural Heritage As a Common Good of Humanity: a Challenge for Criminal Justice
    International Scientific and Professional Advisory Council of the United Nations Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Programme PROTECTING CULTURAL HERITAGE AS A COMMON GOOD OF HUMANITY: A CHALLENGE FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE Edited by Stefano Manacorda Arianna Visconti Selected papers and contributions from the international Conference on «Protecting Cultural Heritage as a Common Good of Humanity: A Challenge for Criminal Justice» Courmayeur Mont Blanc, Italy 13-15 December 2013 STEFANO MANACORDA Professor of Criminal Law, University of Naples II, Italy; Visiting Professor, Queen Mary University of London, UK; ISPAC Deputy Chair and Director ARIANNA VISCONTI Researcher in Criminal Law, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy ISBN 978-88-96410-03-5 © ISPAC, 2014 Via Palestro 12, 20121 Milano, Italy; phone: +39-02-86460714; E-mail: [email protected] ; Web Site: http://ispac.cnpds.org/ The views and opinions expressed in this volume are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the United Nations or the organizations with which the authors are affiliated. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by print, photocopy, microfilm or any other means without prior written permission from CNPDS/ISPAC. Acknowledgements ISPAC wishes to thank the “Fondazione Centro Internazionale su Diritto, Società e Economia” and its President, Dr. Lodovico Passerin d’Entrèves, for their generous contribution towards the publication of this book. CONTENTS Preface STEFANO MANACORDA p. 9 Keynote Address JOHN SANDAGE p. 17 Part I – Illegal Traffic in Cultural Property: The Need for Reform Patrimonio culturale e beni comuni: un nuovo compito per la comunità internazionale UGO MATTEI p.
    [Show full text]
  • Far from Stability: the Post-Election Landscape in Bulgaria Dariusz Kałan
    No. 50 (503), 15 May 2013 © PISM Editors: Marcin Zaborowski (Editor-in-Chief) . Katarzyna Staniewska (Managing Editor) Jarosław Ćwiek-Karpowicz . Artur Gradziuk . Piotr Kościński Roderick Parkes . Marcin Terlikowski . Beata Wojna Far from Stability: The Post-Election Landscape in Bulgaria Dariusz Kałan Early parliamentary elections not only will not help restore political stability in Bulgaria but also could further deepen the chaos because of the high dispersion of votes and the expected difficulties with creating a coalition. For a country immersed in crisis, maintaining the post-election stalemate is particularly not beneficial because of the deteriorating economic situation and growing public pressure. Regardless of which party will return to power, one should not expect a significant improvement in Bulgaria’s image in the EU or a positive settlement of the most important issues, including the country’s rapid accession to the Schengen area. Although the winner of the early parliamentary elections of 12 May was the centre-right Citizens for European Development of Bulgaria (GERB, 30% of votes), for all four parties that exceeded the 4% electoral threshold, the results can be seen as satisfactory. GERB, the ruling party in 2009–2013, won for the second time in a row during unfavourable economic and social situations. The similar support for the Bulgarian Socialist Party (27%), which received more than 600,000 additional votes than in 2009, is because of the mobilisation of its permanent electorate and generational changes in the party. Also, for the Movement for Rights and Freedoms (11%), which represents the Turkish minority, and the nationalist Attack party (7%), the results are a confirmation of their stable positions on the political scene.
    [Show full text]
  • WHY COMPETITION in the POLITICS INDUSTRY IS FAILING AMERICA a Strategy for Reinvigorating Our Democracy
    SEPTEMBER 2017 WHY COMPETITION IN THE POLITICS INDUSTRY IS FAILING AMERICA A strategy for reinvigorating our democracy Katherine M. Gehl and Michael E. Porter ABOUT THE AUTHORS Katherine M. Gehl, a business leader and former CEO with experience in government, began, in the last decade, to participate actively in politics—first in traditional partisan politics. As she deepened her understanding of how politics actually worked—and didn’t work—for the public interest, she realized that even the best candidates and elected officials were severely limited by a dysfunctional system, and that the political system was the single greatest challenge facing our country. She turned her focus to political system reform and innovation and has made this her mission. Michael E. Porter, an expert on competition and strategy in industries and nations, encountered politics in trying to advise governments and advocate sensible and proven reforms. As co-chair of the multiyear, non-partisan U.S. Competitiveness Project at Harvard Business School over the past five years, it became clear to him that the political system was actually the major constraint in America’s inability to restore economic prosperity and address many of the other problems our nation faces. Working with Katherine to understand the root causes of the failure of political competition, and what to do about it, has become an obsession. DISCLOSURE This work was funded by Harvard Business School, including the Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness and the Division of Research and Faculty Development. No external funding was received. Katherine and Michael are both involved in supporting the work they advocate in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Baltic Unity Within European Unity – Why Myth, Not Reality?
    1 Baltic Unity within European Unity – why Myth, not Reality? In recent years a debate about development of the European Union (EU) has become hugely important. There are diverse views on the direction of federalism, which the President of the European Commission J. M. D. Barroso is passionately promoting: “Let’s not be afraid of the words: we will need to move towards a federation of nation states. This is what we need. This is our political horizon.”1 As a consequence of such ambitious plans, the question of national identity and independence has become crucial. However, less attention has been paid to the problem of regional cooperation and the effects of already existing European integration on it, which is exactly what this report aims at. In mass media one can often hear about an entity called ‘the Baltic States‘. This union of three states Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania has cooperated quite a lot in the two last decades of 20th century, however, now the importance of cooperation seems to be in decline. The Baltic unity in the European unity (i.e. EU) is a myth because of two reasons: passive effect of the integration in the EU, when the European unity indirectly and unintentionally influences the cooperation among the Baltic States, and active effect of the policies of the EU, when they have deliberate impact on the Baltic Unity. Baltic Unity before the EU In order to indicate why Baltic unity is impossible in the context of integrated Europe, it is necessary to recall the common aim of Baltic cooperation before the accession to the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunism Not Ideology: Fidesz's Campaign Against Sexual Minorities
    Opportunism not Ideology: Fidesz’s Campaign Against Sexual Minorities Article by Kata Benedek July 23, 2021 A new law targeting LGBTQI+ people in Hungary is just the latest move in the ruling party’s history of stigmatising sexual minorities and rolling back their rights. While the European Union finally seems willing to send a signal that the Hungarian government’s agenda is in defiance of European values and fundamental rights, its leader Viktor Orbán seems determined to pursue this illiberal course. Kata Benedek looks back at the path which has brought Hungary to this point, and the prospects for a change of direction. “I am defending the rights of the homosexual guys.” This is how Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán answered a journalist’s question as he arrived at the European Council as part of a visit to Brussels in late June 2021. The remark came after an hours-long debate had taken place in the European Council about the new Hungarian law discriminating against the LGBTQI+ community. The controversial law – that was passed on 15 June on the grounds of child protection – conflates LGBTQI+ people with the sexual abuse of children. The new bill simultaneously introduces a US-style registry of paedophile sex offenders combined with a Russian-style ban on exposing minors to so-called LGBTQI+ propaganda in the context of sexual education and general representation in education and media. The law was widely criticised both domestically and abroad for undermining equality, fundamental rights, freedom of expression, rights to information, and for treating sexual minorities in a manner similar to criminals, by suggesting that both categories deserve the same social judgement and treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenger Party List
    Appendix List of Challenger Parties Operationalization of Challenger Parties A party is considered a challenger party if in any given year it has not been a member of a central government after 1930. A party is considered a dominant party if in any given year it has been part of a central government after 1930. Only parties with ministers in cabinet are considered to be members of a central government. A party ceases to be a challenger party once it enters central government (in the election immediately preceding entry into office, it is classified as a challenger party). Participation in a national war/crisis cabinets and national unity governments (e.g., Communists in France’s provisional government) does not in itself qualify a party as a dominant party. A dominant party will continue to be considered a dominant party after merging with a challenger party, but a party will be considered a challenger party if it splits from a dominant party. Using this definition, the following parties were challenger parties in Western Europe in the period under investigation (1950–2017). The parties that became dominant parties during the period are indicated with an asterisk. Last election in dataset Country Party Party name (as abbreviation challenger party) Austria ALÖ Alternative List Austria 1983 DU The Independents—Lugner’s List 1999 FPÖ Freedom Party of Austria 1983 * Fritz The Citizens’ Forum Austria 2008 Grüne The Greens—The Green Alternative 2017 LiF Liberal Forum 2008 Martin Hans-Peter Martin’s List 2006 Nein No—Citizens’ Initiative against
    [Show full text]
  • EPP MEMBER PARTIES : Ordinary, Associate, Observer and Partners Status : 19 March 2021
    EPP MEMBER PARTIES : Ordinary, Associate, Observer and Partners Status : 19 March 2021 COUNTRY FULL NAME ABBR. ADDRESS ZIP CODE CITY PRESIDENT TYPE 1 Austria Die neue Volkspartei ÖVP - AT Lichtenfelsgasse 7 1010 Wien KURZ Sebastian Ordinary Member Party 2 Belgium Christen-Democratisch en Vlaams CD&V - BE Wetstraat 89 1040 Brussel COENS Joachim Ordinary Member Party 3 Belgium Centre Démocrate Humaniste CDH - BE Rue du Commerce 123 1000 Bruxelles PREVOT Maxime Ordinary Member Party 4 Bulgaria Bulgaria of the Citizens Movement BCM - BG 7 Georgi Benkovski 1000 Sofia DELCHEV Dimitar Ordinary Member Party 5 Bulgaria Democrats for a Strong Bulgaria DSB - BG 18 Vitosha Blvd 1000 Sofia ATANASOV Atanas Ordinary Member Party 6 Bulgaria GERB - Citizens for European Development of Bulgaria GERB - BG Pl.Bulgaria1, NDK Administrativna sgrada, et.17 1000 Sofia BORISSOV Boyko Ordinary Member Party 7 Bulgaria Union of Democratic Forces UDF - BG 134 Rakovski Street 1000 Sofia HRISTOV Rumen Ordinary Member Party 8 Croatia Croatian Democratic Union HDZ - HR Trg zrtava fasizma 4 10 000 Zagreb PLENKOVIC Andrej Ordinary Member Party 9 Cyprus Democratic Rally of Cyprus DR - CY Pindarou 25 P.O. Box 25305 1308 Nicosia NEOFYTOU Averof Ordinary Member Party 10 Czech Republic The Christian and Democratic Union-Czech People's Party KDU-CSL - CZ Palac Charitas, Karlovo namesti 5 12800 Prague 2 JURECKA Marian Ordinary Member Party 11 Czech Republic TOP09 TOP09 - CZ Opletalova 1603/57 11000 Prague 1 ADAMOVA Marketa Ordinary Member Party 12 Denmark Det Konservative Folkeparti DKF - DK Christiansborg 1240 Copenhagen K PAPE POULSEN Soren Ordinary Member Party 13 Denmark Kristendemokraterne KD - DK Vermlandsgade 51 2300 Copenhagen ARENDT Isabella Ordinary Member Party 14 Estonia Pro Patria - Isamaa Isamaa - EE Paldiski mnt 13 10137 Tallinn SEEDER Helir-Valdor Ordinary Member Party 15 Finland Kansallinen Kokoomus KK - FI Kansakoulukuja 3 A 00100 Helsinki ORPO Petteri Ordinary Member Party 16 Finland Suomen Kristillisdemokraatit SK(KD) - FI Karjalankatu 2 C 7krs.
    [Show full text]
  • Representations of Unity in Soviet State Symbols
    Soiuz and Symbolic Union: Representations of Unity in Soviet State Symbols Anne M. Platoff ff fvast Defining the Soviet Union representatives of four republics signed the During its nearly 70-year existence from 1922- ‘Treaty of the Creation of the Union of Soviet 1991, the Soviet Union was the world’s largest Socialist Republics’ and the ‘Declaration of the country. From the end of World War II through the Creation of the USSR’, officially reuniting the breakup of the USSR, this vast state spanned an Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic area of 22,402,200 square kilometres (8,649,500 (Russian SFSR), the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist sq. mi.) across 11 time zones in north-eastern Republic (Ukrainian SSR), the Byelorussian Soviet Europe and northern Asia. The borders of the Socialist Republic (Byelorussian SSR), and the country measured more than 60,000 km (37,282 Transcaucasian Socialist Federative Soviet miles) and were adjacent to 12 countries, 12 seas, Republic (Transcaucasian SFSR; comprised of as well as the Arctic, Atlantic, and Pacific Oceans. Armenia, Georgia, and Azerbaijan) into one In terms of population (285,743,000 in 1989), the multinational state. Throughout the history of the USSR ranked third in the world behind China and country some republics were subdivided, others India. The full name of the country in Russian was were added, and one became an autonomous Soiuz Sovetskikh Sotsialisticheskikh Respublik, republic of the RSFSR, with the total number which translated into English as ‘Union of Soviet ranging from four to sixteen. From 1956 through Socialist Republics.’ The word ‘Soviet’ (which in 1991, there were fifteen Soviet republics.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Heritage in the Realm of the Commons: Conversations on the Case of Greece
    Stelios Lekakis Stelios Lekakis Edited by Edited by CulturalCultural heritageheritage waswas inventedinvented inin thethe realmrealm ofof nation-states,nation-states, andand fromfrom EditedEdited byby anan earlyearly pointpoint itit waswas consideredconsidered aa publicpublic good,good, stewardedstewarded toto narratenarrate thethe SteliosStelios LekakisLekakis historichistoric deedsdeeds ofof thethe ancestors,ancestors, onon behalfbehalf ofof theirtheir descendants.descendants. NowaNowa-- days,days, asas thethe neoliberalneoliberal rhetoricrhetoric wouldwould havehave it,it, itit isis forfor thethe benefitbenefit ofof thesethese tax-payingtax-paying citizenscitizens thatthat privatisationprivatisation logiclogic thrivesthrives inin thethe heritageheritage sector,sector, toto covercover theirtheir needsneeds inin thethe namename ofof socialsocial responsibilityresponsibility andand otherother truntrun-- catedcated viewsviews ofof thethe welfarewelfare state.state. WeWe areare nownow atat aa criticalcritical stage,stage, wherewhere thisthis doubledouble enclosureenclosure ofof thethe pastpast endangersendangers monuments,monuments, thinsthins outout theirtheir socialsocial significancesignificance andand manipulatesmanipulates theirtheir valuesvalues inin favourfavour ofof economisticeconomistic horizons.horizons. Conversations on the Case of Greece Conversations on the Case of Greece Cultural Heritage in the Realm of Commons: Cultural Heritage in the Realm of Commons: ThisThis volumevolume examinesexamines whetherwhether wewe cancan placeplace
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Political Data Set, 1960-2019 Codebook
    1 Codebook: Comparative Political Data Set, 1960-2019 Codebook: COMPARATIVE POLITICAL DATA SET 1960-2019 Klaus Armingeon, Sarah Engler and Lucas Leemann The Comparative Political Data Set 1960-2019 (CPDS) is a collection of political and institutional data which have been assembled in the context of the research projects “Die Handlungsspielräume des Nationalstaates” and “Critical junctures. An international comparison” directed by Klaus Armingeon and funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation. This data set consists of (mostly) annual data for 36 democratic OECD and/or EU- member countries for the period of 1960 to 2019. In all countries, political data were collected only for the democratic periods.1 The data set is suited for cross-national, longitudinal and pooled time-series analyses. The present data set combines and replaces the earlier versions “Comparative Political Data Set I” (data for 23 OECD countries from 1960 onwards) and the “Comparative Political Data Set III” (data for 36 OECD and/or EU member states from 1990 onwards). A variable has been added to identify former CPDS I countries. For additional detailed information on the composition of government in the 36 countries, please consult the “Supplement to the Comparative Political Data Set – Government Composition 1960-2019”, available on the CPDS website. The Comparative Political Data Set contains some additional demographic, socio- and economic variables. However, these variables are not the major concern of the project and are thus limited in scope. For more in-depth sources of these data, see the online databases of the OECD, Eurostat or AMECO. When using data from this data set, please quote both the data set and, where appropriate, the original source.
    [Show full text]