DOCSLIB.ORG

Extrinsic Effects of Cranial Modification

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Extrinsic Effects of Cranial Modification Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Anthropology Theses Department of Anthropology Spring 5-9-2015 Extrinsic Effects of Cranial Modification: A Case Study of Cranial Porosity and Cranial Modification Intensity in Late Intermediate Period (AD 1000 - AD 1400) Andahuaylas, Peru Davette N. Gadison Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/anthro_theses Recommended Citation Gadison, Davette N., "Extrinsic Effects of Cranial Modification: A Case Study of Cranial Porosity and Cranial Modification Intensity in Late Intermediate Period (AD 1000 - AD 1400) Andahuaylas, Peru." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2015. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/anthro_theses/95 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Anthropology at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EXTRINSIC EFFECTS OF CRANIAL MODIFICATION: A CASE STUDY OF CRANIAL POROSITY AND CRANIAL MODIFICATION INTENSITY IN LATE INTERMEDIATE PERIOD (AD 1000 – AD 1400) ANDAHUAYLAS, PERU by DAVETTE NICHOLE GADISON Under the Direction of Bethany L. Turner-Livermore, PhD ABSTRACT Body alterations such as artificial cranial modification are permanent irreversible changes to the body that become a powerful, constant visual “salient” indicator (Torres-Rouff 2002) or life-long affiliation or demarcation of social identity (Kurin 2014). Most studies have focused on the social implications as well as typology and classification methods. Very few studies have investigated the extrinsic pathological consequences of external compression caused by the boards, pads, and bands used to create pressure at various points on the skull in order to achieve the desired modified shape. This study investigates the relationship between porotic lesions on the external cranial vault and the degree of modification intensity of the predominant cranial modification forms in the Chanka and Quechua societies from the Late Intermediate Period (AD 1000 to AD 1400) in Andahuaylas, Peru. INDEX WORDS: artificial cranial modification, porotic hyperostosis, cribra orbitalia, Andahuaylas EXTRINSIC EFFECTS OF CRANIAL MODIFICATION: A CASE STUDY OF CRANIAL POROSITY AND CRANIAL MODIFICATION INTENSITY IN LATE INTERMEDIATE PERIOD (AD 1000 – AD 1400) ANDAHUAYLAS, PERU by DAVETTE NICHOLE GADISON A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the College of Arts and Sciences Georgia State University 2015 Copyright by Davette Nichole Gadison 2015 EXTRINSIC EFFECTS OF CRANIAL MODIFICATION: A CASE STUDY OF CRANIAL POROSITY AND CRANIAL MODIFICATION INTENSITY IN LATE INTERMEDIATE PERIOD (AD 1000 – AD 1400) ANDAHUAYLAS, PERU by DAVETTE NICHOLE GADISON Committee Chair: Bethany L. Turner-Livermore Committee: Danielle S. Kurin Nicola O. Sharratt Electronic Version Approved: Office of Graduate Studies College of Arts and Sciences Georgia State University May 2015 iv DEDICATION To my family: Rosalind, David, and Dathan. Thank you for your support. v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my deepest gratitude to Dr. Danielle Kurin for allowing me to do this research and for encouraging and pushing me to be a better scholar. It has been an honor to be able to take part in this research. To Dr. Bethany Turner-Livermore, thank you for being a great adviser and allowing me the freedom gain additional field experience and field work during the semester. You have provided me with confidence throughout this process. Thank you for everything. I thank Dr. Nicola Sharratt for her encouragement, as well as providing great advice during this process. I would also like to thank my cohort; for their support, friendship, and good laughs. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................ v LIST OF TABLES .............................................................................................................. x LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................... xi 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Research Objective ................................................................................................ 1 1.1.1 Research Questions and Hypotheses ............................................................... 2 1.2 Expected Results ................................................................................................... 3 2 CRANIAL MODIFICATION ...................................................................................... 4 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Artificial Cranial Modification in the Prehistoric Andes ...................................... 7 2.3 Artificial Cranial Modification in Andahuaylas.................................................... 9 2.4 Consequences of Artificial Cranial Modification ............................................... 11 2.4.1 Changes to Bone Structure ............................................................................ 11 2.4.2 External Reactions ......................................................................................... 13 2.4.3 Social Violence............................................................................................... 14 2.5 Summary ............................................................................................................. 14 3 CRANIAL GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT ........................................................ 16 3.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 16 3.2 Developmental Anatomy..................................................................................... 17 vii 3.3 The Ossification Process ..................................................................................... 22 3.4 Postnatal Growth ................................................................................................. 23 3.5 Brain Expansion, Cranial Growth, and Cultural Compression ........................... 24 3.6 Intrinsic and Extrinsic Cranial Expansion ........................................................... 25 3.6.1 Intrinsic Adjustments of Cranial Growth ....................................................... 29 3.7 Extrinsic Alterations of Cranial Vault Expansion ............................................... 31 3.8 Summary ............................................................................................................. 33 4 CRANIAL LESIONS ................................................................................................. 34 4.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 34 4.2 Porotic Hyperostosis and Cribra Orbitalia .......................................................... 35 4.3 Parasites ............................................................................................................... 38 4.4 Infection .............................................................................................................. 39 4.5 Cranial Porosity and Modification ...................................................................... 39 4.6 Case Study ........................................................................................................... 40 4.7 Summary ............................................................................................................. 44 5 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................ 45 5.1 Geography ........................................................................................................... 45 5.2 Culture History .................................................................................................... 47 5.3 Wari in Andahuaylas ........................................................................................... 52 5.4 After Collapse ..................................................................................................... 53 viii 5.4.1 Ethnogenesis in Andahuaylas ........................................................................ 54 5.4.2 Cranial Modification and Ethnogenesis in Andahuaylas .............................. 56 5.5 Summary ............................................................................................................. 58 6 RESEARCH DESIGN ................................................................................................ 60 6.1 Overview ............................................................................................................. 60 6.2 Research Question ............................................................................................... 61 6.3 Methodology ....................................................................................................... 61 6.3.1 Assessing Cranial Modification ..................................................................... 62 6.3.2 Age Estimation ............................................................................................... 63 6.3.3 Sex Estimation ...............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Descriptive Analysis of Human Remains from the Fuller and Fanning Mounds
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF David Stepp for the degree of Master of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies in the co- departments of Anthropology, Zoology, and Statistics presented onFebruary 2, 1994. Title :Descriptive Analysis of Human Remains from the Fuller and Fanning Mounds, Yamhill River, Willamette Valley, Oregon Redacted for Privacy Abstract Approved : Roberta Hall The study presents the results of a descriptive analysis of the skeletal remains of 66 individuals recovered from the Fuller and Fanning Mound sites, located on the Yamhill River, Willamette Valley, Oregon, excavated in 1941-42 by W. T. Edmundson and William S. Laughlin. The literature and original field notes have been analyzed, and a description of burial type, side, orientation, grave type, associations, original preservation, and other information has been compiled for each individual. A tally of each of these burial attributes for the Yamhill population as a whole is also completed. In addition, an assessment of age, sex, and stature, a series of craniometric measurements, and non-metric traits, a dental analysis, and general description of obvious pathologic and morphologic condition of each individual and the group as a whole have been accomplished. Differences in trade item associations between deformed and non-deformed individuals suggest either a later arrival of cranial deformation practices (and possibly another cultural group) to the area, and possibly a multiple occupation of the Fuller and Fanning sites, or an elite class separation defined in part by artificial deformation of crania. Cranial deformation is also associated with the frequency of certain cranial discrete traits. Sexual dimorphism was noted in metric but not in non-metric analyses.
    [Show full text]
  • The Neanderthal ''Chignon'': Variation, Integration, and Homology
    Journal of Human Evolution 52 (2007) 262e274 The Neanderthal ‘‘chignon’’: Variation, integration, and homology Philipp Gunz, Katerina Harvati* Department of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany Received 10 May 2006; accepted 31 August 2006 Abstract The occipital bun (‘‘chignon’’) is cited widely as a Neanderthal derived trait. It encompasses the posterior projection/convexity of the occipital squama and is associated with lambdoid flattening on the parietal. A ‘hemibun’ in some Upper Paleolithic Europeans is thought by some authors to indicate interbreeding between Neanderthals and early modern Europeans. However, ‘bunning’ is difficult to measure, and the term has been applied to a range of morphological patterns. Furthermore, its usefulness in phylogenetic reconstruction and its homologous status across modern and fossil humans have been disputed. We present a geometric morphometric study that quantitatively evaluates the chignon, assesses its usefulness in separating Neanderthals from modern humans, and its degree of similarity to Upper Paleolithic ‘hemibuns.’ We measured the three-dimensional coordinates of closely spaced points along the midsagittal plane from bregma to inion and of anatomical landmarks in a large series of recent human crania and several Middle and Late Pleistocene European and African fossils. These coordinate data were processed using the techniques of geometric morphometrics and analyzed with relative warps, canonical variates, and singular warps. Our results show no separation between Neanderthals and modern humans, including early modern Europeans, when the shape of the occipital plane midsagittal-profile is considered alone. On the other hand, Neanderthals are well separated from both recent and fossil modern humans when information about the occipital’s relative position and relative size are also included.
    [Show full text]
  • What's in a Neanderthal
    WHAT’S IN A NEANDERTHAL: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS Taylorlyn Stephan Oberlin College Dept. of Anthropology Advised by Prof. Amy Margaris TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Abstract – pg. 3 II. Introduction – pg. 3-4 III. Historical Background – pg. 4-5 a. Fig. 1 – pg. 5 IV. Methods – pg. 5-8 a. Figs. 2 and 3 – pg. 6 V. Genomic Definitions – pg. 8-9 VI. Site Introduction – pg. 9-10 a. Fig 4 – pg. 10 VII. El Sidron – pg. 10-14 a. Table – pg. 10-12 b. Figs. 5-7 – pg. 12 c. Figs. 8 and 9 – pg. 13 VIII. Mezmaiskaya – pg. 14-18 a. Table – pg. 14-16 b. Figs. 10 and 11 – pg. 16 IX. Shanidar – pg. 18-22 a. Table – pg. 19-20 b. Figs. 12 and 13 – pg.21 X. Vindija – pg. 22-28 a. Table – pg. 23-25 b. Fig. 14 – pg. 25 c. Figs. 15-18 – pg. 26 XI. The Neanderthal Genome Project – pg. 28-32 a. Table – pg. 29 b. Fig. 19 – pg. 29 c. Figs. 20 and 21 – pg. 30 XII. Discussion – pg. 32- 36 XIII. Conclusion – pg. 36-38 XIV. Bibliography – pg. 38-42 2 ABSTRACT In this analysis, I seek to understand how three separate lines of evidence – skeletal morphology, archaeology, and genomics – are used separately and in tandem to produce taxonomic classifications in Neanderthal and paleoanthropological research more generally. To do so, I have selected four sites as case studies: El Sidrón Cave, Mezmaiskaya Cave, Shanidar Cave, and Vindija Cave. El Sidrón, Mezmaiskaya, and Vindija all have detailed archaeological records and have yielded Neanderthal DNA.
    [Show full text]
  • J. L. Arsuaga, I. Martínez, A. Gracia & C. Lorenzo the Sima De Los Huesos Crania (Sierra De Atapuerca, Spain). a Comparativ
    J. L. Arsuaga, The Sima de los Huesos crania (Sierra I. Martínez, A. Gracia de Atapuerca, Spain). A comparative & C. Lorenzo study Departamento de Paleontología, U.A. de Paleoantropología UCM-CSIC, The Sima de los Huesos (Sierra de Atapuerca) cranial remains found up to and Instituto de Geología Económica including the 1995 field season are described and compared with other fossils UCM-CSIC; Facultad de Ciencias in order to assess their evolutionary relationships. The phenetic affinities of the Geológicas, Universidad Complutense de Sima de los Huesos crania and a large sample of Homo fossils are investigated Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria, through principal component analyses. Metrical comparisons of the Sima de 28040 Madrid, Spain los Huesos and other European and African Middle Pleistocene fossils with Neandertals are performed using Z-scores relative to the Neandertal sample Received 16 April 1996 statistics. The most relevant cranial traits are metrically and morphologically Revision received 11 October analyzed and cladistically evaluated. The Sima de los Huesos crania exhibit a 1996 and accepted 19 January number of primitive traits lost in Upper Pleistocene Neandertals (especially in 1997 the braincase, but also in the facial skeleton), as well as other traits that are transitional to the Neandertal morphology (particularly in the occipital bone), Keywords: Sima de los Huesos, and features close to what is found in Neandertals (as the supraorbital Atapuerca, Middle Pleistocene, morphology and midfacial prognathism). Different combinations of primitive morphometrics, crania. and derived traits (shared with Neandertals) are also displayed by the other European Middle Pleistocene fossils. In conclusion, the Sima de los Huesos sample is evolutionarily related to Neandertals as well as to the other European Middle Pleistocene fossils.
    [Show full text]
  • Basicranial Influence on Overall Cranial Shape
    Daniel E. Lieberman Basicranial influence on overall cranial Department of Anthropology, shape The George Washington University, 2110 G St, NW, This study examines the extent to which the major dimensions of the Washington, DC 20052, cranial base (maximum length, maximum breadth, and flexion) U.S.A. E-mail: interact with brain volume to influence major proportions of the [email protected] and Human neurocranium and face. A model is presented for developmental Origins Program, National interactions that occur during ontogeny between the brain and the Museum of National History, cranial base and neurocranium, and between the neurobasicranial Smithsonian Institution, complex (NBC) and the face. The model is tested using exocranial Washington, DC 20560, and radiographic measurements of adult crania sampled from five U.S.A. geographically and craniometrically diverse populations. The results indicate that while variations in the breadth, length and flexion of the Osbjorn M. Pearson cranial base are mutually independent, only the maximum breadth of Department of Anthropology, the cranial base (POB) has significant effects on overall cranial University of New Mexico, proportions, largely through its interactions with brain volume which Albuquerque, NM 87131, influence NBC breadth. These interactions also have a slight influ- U.S.A. ence on facial shape because NBC width constrains facial width, and because narrow-faced individuals tend to have antero-posteriorly Kenneth M. longer faces relative to facial breadth than wide-faced individuals. Finally, the model highlights how integration between the cranial Mowbray base and the brain may help to account for the developmental basis of Department of Anthropology, some morphological variations such as occipital bunning.
    [Show full text]
  • Biomechanics of the Hominine Cranium with Speical Reference To
    National Library Bibliotheque nationale 1+1 of Canada du Canada Acquisitions and Direction des acquisitions et Bibliographic Services Branch des services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa, Ontario Ottawa (Ontario) K1A ON4 KIA ON4 The quality of this microform is La qualit6 de cette microforme heavily dependent upon the depend grandement de la quali" quality of the original thesis de la these soumise au submitted far microfilming. microfilmage. Nous avons tout Every effort has been made to fait pour assurer une qualit6 ensure the highest quality of superieure de reproduction. reproduction possible. If pages are missing, contact the S'il manque des pages, veuillez university which granted the communiquer avec I'universite degree. qui a confere le grade. Some pages may have indistinct La qualite d'impression de print especially if the original certaines pages peut laisser a pages were typed with a poor desirer, surtout si les pages typewriter ribbon or if the originales ont 6te university sent us an inferior dactylographiees a I'aide d'un photocopy. ruban us6 ou si I'universite nous a fait parvenir une photocopie de qualit4 inferieure. Reproduction in full or in part of La reproduction, mBme partielle, this microform is governed by de eette microforme est soumise the Canadian Copyright Act, la Loi canadienne sw le droit R.S.C. 1970, c. C-30, and d'auteur, SRC 1970, c. C-30, et subsequent amendments. ses amendements subsequents. BIOMECHANICS OF THE HOMlNlNE CRANIUM WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO HOMQ ERECTUS AND THE ARCHAIC HOMO SAPIENS Christopher John Kniisel B.A.(Hon.) University of Wisconsin-Madison 1984 M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Internal Cranial Anatomy of the Middle Pleistocene Broken Hill 1 Cranium Antoine Balzeau A,B, Laura T. Buck C, D, E, Lou
    The internal cranial anatomy of the middle Pleistocene Broken Hill 1 cranium Antoine Balzeau a,b, Laura T. Buck c, d, e, Lou Albessard a, Gaël Becam a, Dominique Grimaud- Hervé a, Todd C. Rae e, Chris B. Stringer c a Équipe de Paléontologie Humaine, UMR 7194 du CNRS, Département Homme et Environnement, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, France. b Department of African Zoology, Royal Museum for Central Africa, B-3080 Tervuren, Belgium. c Earth Sciences Department, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, UK d Division of Biological Anthropology, University of Cambridge, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 3QG, UK e Centre for Evolutionary, Social and InterDisciplinary Anthropology, University of Roehampton, Holybourne Avenue, London, SW15 4JD, UK Running title: Anatomy of the Broken Hill 1 cranium Abstract The cranium (Broken Hill 1 or BH1) from the site previously known as Broken Hill, Northern Rhodesia (now Kabwe, Zambia) is one of the best preserved hominin fossils from the mid- Pleistocene. Its distinctive combination of anatomical features, however, makes its taxonomic attribution ambiguous. High resolution microCT, which has not previously been employed for gross morphological studies of this important specimen, allows a precise description of the internal anatomical features of BH1, including the distribution of cranial vault thickness and its 1 internal composition, paranasal pneumatisation, pneumatisation of the temporal bone and endocranial anatomy. Relative to other chronologically and taxonomically relevant specimens, BH1 shows unusually marked paranasal pneumatisation and a fairly thick cranial vault. For many of the features analysed, this fossil does not exhibit the apomorphic conditions observed in either Neandertals or Homo sapiens.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Souvenir Aveocon
    TABLE OF CONTENTS S.N. CONTENTS PAGE NO. (Click here) 1 ORGANIZING COMITTEE 1 2 ABOUT TEERTHANKER MAHAVEER UNIVERSITY 2 3 ABOUT TEERTHANKER MAHAVEER MEDICAL COLLEGE & 3 RESEARCH CENTRE ABOUT 4 VISION 5 MISSION 5 OBJECTIVES 6 INFRASTRUCTURE 6-7 MUSEUM 7-8 DISSECTION HALL 8 CADAVERIC COMPLEX 9 4 DEPARTMENT OF ANATOMY HISTOLOGY LAB 9-10 LIBRARY 10 RESEARCH LABORATORY 11 DEMONSTRATION ROOM 11 OSTEOLOGY LAB 12 DISSECTION INSTRUMENTS 13 RADIOLOGICAL ANATOMY 13 LECTURE IN PROGRESS 14 PUBLIC AWARENESS ON BODY 15-16 DONATION AETCOM SESSIONS 17 CADAVERIC OATH CEREMONY 17 ACHIEVER’S AWARD 18 CEREMONY 5 RECENT ACTIVITIES OF ANATOMY DEPARTMENT POSTER COMPETITION 19-20 PANEL DISCUSSION ON 20-21 AETCOM CULTURAL & ACADEMIC 21-23 ACTIVITIES MODEL PRESENTATION BY PG 23-24 STUDNETS GALLERY OF HISTORY OF 24 ANATOMY 6 PHOTOGRAPHS MBBS BATCH (2020-21) 25 DR. S. K. JAIN 25-26 DR. NIDHI SHARMA 27-29 DR. HINA NAFEES 29 7 RESEARCH ARENA DR. SUPRITI BHATNAGAR 29 DR. DILSHAD USMANI 29 DR. RASHMI BHARADWAJ 29 DR. SONIKA SHARMA 29 THESIS TOPIC OF PG STUDENTS 30 8 PHOTOGRAPH OF FACULTIES OF DEPARTMENT OF 31 ANATOMY 9 PHOTOGRAPH OF FACULTIES OF DEPARTMENT OF 32 ANATOMY WITH PG STUDENTS 10 WELCOME OF DELEGATES 33 SHRI SURESH JAIN 34 (CHANCELLOR) PROF. RAGHUVIR SINGH 35 ( VICE-CHANCELLOR) SHRI ABHISHEK KAPOOR 36 ( DIRECTOR-ADMIN.) DR. SHYMOLI DUTTA 37 ( PRINCIPAL) 11 MESSAGES DR. KULDEEP SINGH 38 ( GENERAL SECRETARY-ASI) DR. S. K. JAIN-ORGANIZING 39 CHAIRPERSON HOD ANATOMY VICE-PRINCIPAL DR. NIDHI SHARMA 40 (ORGANIZING SECRETARY) DAY 1 41 12 PROGRAMME AT A GLANCE DAY 2 42 13 DETAILS OF DAY 1 43-54 14 DETAILS OF DAY 2 55-66 DR.
    [Show full text]