A Barcode for the Authentication of the Snappers (Lutjanidae) of the Western Atlantic: Rdna 5S Or Mitochondrial COI?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Barcode for the Authentication of the Snappers (Lutjanidae) of the Western Atlantic: Rdna 5S Or Mitochondrial COI? Food Control 38 (2014) 116e123 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Food Control journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foodcont A barcode for the authentication of the snappers (Lutjanidae) of the western Atlantic: rDNA 5S or mitochondrial COI? Ivana Veneza a, Bruna Felipe a, Joiciane Oliveira a, Raimundo Silva a, Iracilda Sampaio b, Horacio Schneider b, Grazielle Gomes a,b,* a Laboratório de Genética Aplicada, Instituto de Estudos Costeiros, Universidade Federal do Pará, Campus Universitário de Bragança, Alameda Leandro Ribeiro s/n, Aldeia, Bragança, Pará, Brazil b Laboratório de Genética and Biologia Molecular, Instituto de Estudos Costeiros, Universidade Federal do Pará, Campus Universitário de Bragança, Brazil article info abstract Article history: The increasing demand for fishery resources in recent years has stimulated a growth in the output of Received 5 February 2013 processed products, which has made the fraudulent substitution of species a common practice. In the Received in revised form present study two different protocols were evaluated for the molecular authentication of lutjanid species, 8 October 2013 one based on the banding pattern of the nuclear rDNA 5S gene, and the other on the sequences of the Accepted 9 October 2013 mitochondrial Cytochrome Oxidase subunit I (COI) gene. A total of 132 samples were analyzed from specimens identified previously as belonging to seven lutjanid species (Lutjanus purpureus, Lutjanus Keywords: synagris, Lutjanus vivanus, Lutjanus jocu, Lutjanus analis, Ocyurus chrysurus,andRhomboplites aurorubens), COI fi fi rDNA 5S as well as unidenti ed individuals. The results indicate the absence of a species-speci c rDNA 5S banding fi Snappers pattern in lutjanids. However, the 1131 bp fragment of the COI gene not only discriminated the identi ed Barcode lutjanid species systematically, but also defined the species of the unidentified specimens, identifying Lutjanids another two species from the database, Lutjanusbucanella and Lutjanuscyanopterus. The species were represented by well-defined consensual clades in the phylogenetic trees, supported by the interspecific distances and the mutations characteristic of each species. This segment of the COI gene proved to be a robust tool for the molecular authentication of lutjanid species. Ó 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction processing can remove distinguishing features, and impede the diagnosis of species recognized solely on the basis of morphological The trade in fishery products has expanded significantly in traits (Carvalho, Neto, Brasil, & Oliveira, 2011; Céspedes et al., 1999; recent years, with a total worldwide harvest of 154 million tons in Filonzi, Chiesa, Vaghi, & Marzano, 2010; Sales, Rodrigues-Filho, 2011, including both wild-caught and farmed produce (FAO, 2012). Haimovici, Sampaio, & Schneider, 2011; Sotelo, Piñeiro, Gallardo, At the same time, there has been an ever-increasing tendency for & Pérez-Martín, 1993). the diversification of the products being marketed, including fillets Inadequate product labeling can have serious consequences in and steaks, smoked fish and canned goods, derived from a wide terms of public health, as well as having ecological and economic range of different fish species. implications. In addition to entailing potential risks for the con- This growth in trade has been accompanied by an increase in the sumer (Van Leeuwen et al., 2009), including financial costs e as fraudulent substitution of more valuable species by inferior ones shown by Marko et al. (2004) in the case of the snappers e it may (Ward, 2000). In addition to the marked morphological similarities impact management programs designed for the conservation of the of species of some fish families, such as the Sciaenidae, Mugilidae, stocks of certain species (Ward, 2000). and Lutjanidae (Allen, 1985; Cervigón, 1993; Cervigón et al., 1993), The lutjanids fishes known as snappers represent an important fishery resource in all the regions where they occur (Allen, 1985; Cervigón, 1993; Matos-Caraballo, 2000; Mendoza & Larez, 1996; Prescod, Oxenford, & Taylor, 1996; Zhang & Liu, 2006). These me- * Corresponding author. Instituto de Estudos Costeiros, Universidade Federal do dium to large-sized fishes are widely distributed in the Atlantic, Pará e Bragança, Alameda Leandro Ribeiro s/n, Aldeia, Bragança, CEP: 68.600-000 fi PA, Brazil. Tel.: þ55 091 3425 1593. Indian, and Paci c oceans. The family is composed of approximately E-mail addresses: [email protected], [email protected] (G. Gomes). 108 species distributed among 17 genera, organized in four 0956-7135/$ e see front matter Ó 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.10.012 I. Veneza et al. / Food Control 38 (2014) 116e123 117 subfamilies, the Etelinae, Apsilinae, Paradicichthyinae, and Lutja- cases (see Céspedes et al., 1999; Rodrigues-Filho et al., 2010; Sales ninae (Allen, 1985; Cervigón, 1993; Froese & Pauly, 2012; Moura & et al., 2011). Lindeman, 2007; Nelson, 2006). Given the marked morphological similarities among the Many lutjanids, such as the red snappers (Lutjanus vivanus, L. different lutjanid species and the fact that snappers are typically purpureus, L. campechanus, L. bucanella, and L. peru), are highly marketed in fillet form, which facilitates the illicit substitution of similar morphologically (Cervigón, 1993; Cervigón et al., 1993; species, an effective molecular species identification protocol Nelson, 2006) and are difficult to identify reliably based on which is both fast and inexpensive is urgently needed. In an external characteristics. This problem is exacerbated by the in- attempt to provide an appropriate approach to this problem, the dustrial processing of catches, which typically involves the removal present study evaluated two different molecular methods e one of the fillets. based on the banding patterns of the amplified rDNA 5S gene Based on the analysis of a fragment of the mitochondrial Cyto- resolved on an agarose gel, and the other, a more conventional chrome b gene, Marko et al. (2004) discovered that approximately approach, which has been shown to be effective in snappers (see 80% of the fillets sold in the United States as red snapper Victor, Hanner, Shivji, Hyde, & Caldow, 2009), based on the analysis (L. campechanus) were actually derived from other lutjanid species, of the sequences of a fragment of the mitochondrial COI gene. This presumably as a result of errors in the identification of specimens comparative analysis will provide an initial step towards the during the production process and/or the intentional substitution development of rapid and low-cost molecular protocols that pro- with less popular and/or cheaper species. vide an unambiguous identification of snapper species. Molecular studies based on nucleotide sequences have become increasingly popular for the identification of fishes and/ 2. Material and methods or fishery products (Brown et al., 1996; Carrera et al., 2000; Chiu, Su, Pai, & Chang, 2012; De Salle & Birstein, 1996; Filonzi et al., 2.1. Samples 2010; Mackie et al., 1999; Rasmussen & Morrissey, 2008; Wen, Hu, Zhang, & Fan, 2011). One genomic region that has been A total of 132 lutjanid specimens (Table 1) were analyzed in the used successfully for molecular diagnosis is the Cytochrome present study. The samples were obtained from the Lutjanidae Oxidase subunit I (COI) gene, which is considered to be a “bio- tissue bank held by the Applied Genetics Laboratory at the Coastal logical barcode” (Hebert, Cywinska, Ball, & de Waard, 2003). A Studies Institute of the Federal University of Pará in Bragança, number of studies have demonstrated the usefulness of different Brazil. In all, 37 of the specimens had been identified previously fragments of this gene for the identification of fish species and (Allen, 1985; Cervigón, 1993; Cervigón et al., 1993; Menezes & the products derived from them (Carvalho, Neto, et al., 2011; Figueiredo, 1980), representing seven species, belonging to three Carvalho, Oliveira, et al., 2011; Filonzi et al., 2010; Haye, genera e Lutjanus (L. purpureus, L. synagris, L. jocu, L. analis, and Segovia, Vera, Gallardo, & Gallardo-Escárate, 2012; Rasmussen, L. vivanus), and the monotypic Rhomboplites aurorubens and Morrissey, & Hebert, 2009; Silva-Oliveira et al., 2011; Ward, Ocyurus chrysurus. The remaining 95 specimens, which were Zemlak, Innes, Last, & Hebert, 2005; Yang, Huang, Hsieh, Huang, collected at a number of different locations around the Brazilian & Chen, 2012). coast, were considered to be “unidentified snappers” or UISs for In addition to DNA sequences, a number of alternatives have this analysis. A number of additional specimens were included in been tested, based on faster and more practicable approaches, the analysis to provide a comparative perspective of rDNA 5S which allow for the analysis of PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) banding patterns at the family level. These specimens include three products directly in agarose gels (see Rodrigues-Filho et al., 2010), individuals representing two haemulidae species (Conodon nobilis such as the banding pattern provided by the amplification of the and Genyatremus luteus), a scombridae (Scomberomorus brasi- rDNA 5S gene. This marker is a multigenic family composed of liensis), a centropomidae (Centropomus undecimalis), and a sciae- repeated units in a conserved coding region with approximately nidae, Cynoscion sp. (Table 1). 120 base pairs arranged in tandem, separated by non-transcribed The approach adopted here
Recommended publications
  • Dedication Donald Perrin De Sylva
    Dedication The Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Mangroves as Fish Habitat are dedicated to the memory of University of Miami Professors Samuel C. Snedaker and Donald Perrin de Sylva. Samuel C. Snedaker Donald Perrin de Sylva (1938–2005) (1929–2004) Professor Samuel Curry Snedaker Our longtime collaborator and dear passed away on March 21, 2005 in friend, University of Miami Professor Yakima, Washington, after an eminent Donald P. de Sylva, passed away in career on the faculty of the University Brooksville, Florida on January 28, of Florida and the University of Miami. 2004. Over the course of his diverse A world authority on mangrove eco- and productive career, he worked systems, he authored numerous books closely with mangrove expert and and publications on topics as diverse colleague Professor Samuel Snedaker as tropical ecology, global climate on relationships between mangrove change, and wetlands and fish communities. Don pollutants made major scientific contributions in marine to this area of research close to home organisms in south and sedi- Florida ments. One and as far of his most afield as enduring Southeast contributions Asia. He to marine sci- was the ences was the world’s publication leading authority on one of the most in 1974 of ecologically important inhabitants of “The ecology coastal mangrove habitats—the great of mangroves” (coauthored with Ariel barracuda. His 1963 book Systematics Lugo), a paper that set the high stan- and Life History of the Great Barracuda dard by which contemporary mangrove continues to be an essential reference ecology continues to be measured. for those interested in the taxonomy, Sam’s studies laid the scientific bases biology, and ecology of this species.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Authentication of Pargo Fillets Lutjanus Purpureus (Perciformes: Lutjanidae) by DNA Barcoding Reveals Commercial Fraud
    Neotropical Ichthyology, 16(1): e170068, 2018 Journal homepage: www.scielo.br/ni DOI: 10.1590/1982-0224-20170068 Published online: 26 March 2018 (ISSN 1982-0224) Copyright © 2018 Sociedade Brasileira de Ictiologia Printed: 31 March 2018 (ISSN 1679-6225) Original article Molecular authentication of Pargo fillets Lutjanus purpureus (Perciformes: Lutjanidae) by DNA barcoding reveals commercial fraud Ivana Veneza1, Raimundo Silva1, Leilane Freitas1, Sâmia Silva1, Kely Martins1, Iracilda Sampaio2, Horacio Schneider2 and Grazielle Gomes1,2 The Caribbean Red Snapper (Pargo) Lutjanus purpureus is the most economically important snapper in Brazil, which is sold, among other forms, as frozen fillets. During the process of transformation into fillets there is the removal of the distinctive morphological traits, being able to favor the substitution by less valued species. In addition, there is no national legislation requiring the insertion of the specific name on the product label. However, according to a Normative Instruction (IN N ° 29/2015 MAPA) that correlates the common and specific names of the products destined to the national trade, in Brazil only L. purpureus and L. campechanus can be denominated “Pargo”. Thus, the DNA barcode tool was used to identify the fillets sold in north of Brazil, labeled “Pargo”, with the aid of sequences from the public and control databases. The results showed that among 142 fillets examined, 78% was identified as L. purpureus and 22% as Rhomboplites aurorubens, a snapper with low commercial value in the country, revealing commercial fraud. The molecular identification method successfully used in this study to authenticate fillets snappers may also be used by surveillance authorities in the quality control of processed fish products, towards ensuring consumer rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Seafood Watch Seafood Report
    Seafood Watch Seafood Report Commercially Important Gulf of Mexico/South Atlantic Snappers Red snapper, Lutjanus campechanus Vermilion snapper, Rhomboplites aurorubens Yellowtail snapper, Ocyurus chrysurus With minor reference to: Gray snapper, Lutjanus griseus Mutton snapper, Lutjanus analis Lane snapper, Lutjanus synagris Lutjanus campechanus Illustration ©Monterey Bay Aquarium Original Report dated April 20, 2004 Last updated February 4, 2009 Melissa M Stevens Fisheries Research Analyst Monterey Bay Aquarium Seafood Watch® Gulf of Mexico/South Atlantic Snappers Report February 4, 2009 About Seafood Watch® and the Seafood Reports Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Seafood Watch® program evaluates the ecological sustainability of wild-caught and farmed seafood commonly found in the United States marketplace. Seafood Watch® defines sustainable seafood as originating from sources, whether wild-caught or farmed, which can maintain or increase production in the long-term without jeopardizing the structure or function of affected ecosystems. Seafood Watch® makes its science-based recommendations available to the public in the form of regional pocket guides that can be downloaded from the Internet (seafoodwatch.org) or obtained from the Seafood Watch® program by emailing [email protected]. The program’s goals are to raise awareness of important ocean conservation issues and empower seafood consumers and businesses to make choices for healthy oceans. Each sustainability recommendation on the regional pocket guides is supported by a Seafood Report. Each report synthesizes and analyzes the most current ecological, fisheries and ecosystem science on a species, then evaluates this information against the program’s conservation ethic to arrive at a recommendation of “Best Choices”, “Good Alternatives” or “Avoid.” The detailed evaluation methodology is available upon request.
    [Show full text]
  • High-Resolution Acoustic Cameras Provide Direct and Efficient
    applied sciences Article High-Resolution Acoustic Cameras Provide Direct and Efficient Assessments of Large Demersal Fish Populations in Extremely Turbid Waters Céline Artero 1,2,* , Simon Marchetti 3, Eric Bauer 3, Christophe Viala 4, Claire Noël 3, Christopher C. Koenig 2, Rachel Berzins 1 and Luis Lampert 5 1 Office Français de la Biodiversité (ex Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage), 97338 Cayenne CEDEX, French Guiana; [email protected] 2 Coastal and Marine Laboratory, Florida State University, St Teresa Beach, FL 32358, USA; [email protected] 3 SEMANTIC T.S., 83110 Sanary-sur-Mer, France; [email protected] (S.M.); [email protected] (E.B.); [email protected] (C.N.) 4 Seaviews, 13600 La Ciotat, France; [email protected] 5 Institut Français de Recherche Pour l’Exploitation de la MER, Dyneco/Pelagos, 29280 Plouzané, France; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +33-(0)-676038745 Abstract: Monitoring fish species populations in very turbid environments is challenging. Acoustic cameras allow work in very poor visibility but are often deployed as a fixed observation point, limiting the scope of the survey. A BlueView P900-130 acoustic camera was deployed in rocky marine habitats off the coast of French Guiana in order to assess the total abundance, size structure and spatial Citation: Artero, C.; Marchetti, S.; distribution of a demersal fish population. The relevancy of using an acoustic camera to achieve these Bauer, E.; Viala, C.; Noël, C.; Koenig, three objectives was evaluated by comparing acoustic data to those obtained from fishing surveys.
    [Show full text]
  • Perciformes: Haemulidae) Inferred Using Mitochondrial and Nuclear Genes
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256288239 A molecular phylogeny of the Grunts (Perciformes: Haemulidae) inferred using mitochondrial and nuclear genes Article in Zootaxa · June 2011 DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.2966.1.4 CITATIONS READS 35 633 3 authors, including: Millicent D Sanciangco Luiz A Rocha Old Dominion University California Academy of Sciences 26 PUBLICATIONS 1,370 CITATIONS 312 PUBLICATIONS 8,691 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Mesophotic Coral Reefs View project Vitória-Trindade Chain View project All content following this page was uploaded by Luiz A Rocha on 20 May 2014. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Zootaxa 2966: 37–50 (2011) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2011 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) A molecular phylogeny of the Grunts (Perciformes: Haemulidae) inferred using mitochondrial and nuclear genes MILLICENT D. SANCIANGCO1, LUIZ A. ROCHA2 & KENT E. CARPENTER1 1Department of Biological Sciences, Old Dominion University, Mills Godwin Building, Norfolk, VA 23529 USA. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 2Marine Science Institute, University of Texas at Austin, 750 Channel View Dr., Port Aransas, TX 78373, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract We infer a phylogeny of haemulid genera using mitochondrial COI and Cyt b genes and nuclear RAG1, SH3PX3, and Plagl2 genes from 56 haemulid species representing 18 genera of the expanded haemulids (including the former inermiids) and ten outgroup species. Results from maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood, and Bayesian analyses show strong support for a monophyletic Haemulidae with the inclusion of Emmelichthyops atlanticus.
    [Show full text]
  • 39 DIETA ALIMENTAR DE Genyatremus Luteus
    DIETA ALIMENTAR DE Genyatremus luteus. DIETA ALIMENTAR DE Genyatremus luteus (BLOCH, 1790) - (TELEOSTEI, PERCIFORMES: HAEMULIDAE) NA BAÍA DE SÃO JOSÉ, MARANHÃO, BRASIL ZAFIRA DA SILVA DE ALMEIDA 1, JORGE LUIZ SILVA NUNES 2 & MARIA DAS GRAÇAS FERREIRA SANTIAGO ALVES. 1 UEMA – Depto. de Química e Biologia, Centro de Ciências Exatas e Naturais, Cidade Universitária Paulo VI, CEP 65.000-000, São Luís, Maranhão – Brasil. e-mail: [email protected]. 2 Programa de Pós-Graduação em Oceanografia, Depto. de Oceanografia da UFPE, Av. da Arquitetura, s/n, Cid. Universitária, CEP 50740-550, Recife, Pernambuco - Brasil. E-mail: [email protected]. 3 Bacharel em Ciências Biológicas. RESUMO Neste trabalho foi estudado a dieta de Genyatremus luteus , aumentando o conhecimento disponível para compreensão da teia trófica em águas costeiras do município de São José de Ribamar – Maranhão. Os indivíduos foram capturados entre os meses de abril e setembro de 1999, utilizando como arte de pesca a linha de mão, lançada a partir de uma biana a motor, embarcação comumente usada pelos pescadores locais. Em laboratório foram realizadas análises quali-quantitativas dos itens alimentares relacionando-os com as estações de coleta e com a fase lunar. Os resultados obtidos demonstraram que a maioria dos tubos digestivos encontrava-se “totalmente cheio” não havendo diferenças estatísticas significativas com relação às estações de coleta e as fases da lua. Os grupos de itens mais freqüentes neste estudo foram Algas (39,2%), Crustacea (21,8%), Bivalvia (15,2%) e Echinodermata (8,0%). Os Crustacea identificados foram: Decapoda, Isopoda, Tanaidacea e Amphipoda, além de quelípodos, télson e carapaça.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Snapper, Vermilion Snapper, Yellowtail Snapper Gulf of Mexico
    Red Snapper, Vermilion Snapper, Yellowtail Snapper Lutjanus campechanus, Rhomboplites aurorubens, Ocyurus chrysurus ©Monterey Bay Aquarium Gulf of Mexico/South Atlantic Vertical Line: Hydraulic/Electric Reel, Rod and Reel, Hand Line January 9, 2013 Rachelle Fisher, Consulting Researcher Disclaimer Seafood Watch® strives to ensure all our Seafood Reports and the recommendations contained therein are accurate and reflect the most up-to-date evidence available at time of publication. All our reports are peer- reviewed for accuracy and completeness by external scientists with expertise in ecology, fisheries science or aquaculture. Scientific review, however, does not constitute an endorsement of the Seafood Watch program or its recommendations on the part of the reviewing scientists. Seafood Watch is solely responsible for the conclusions reached in this report. We always welcome additional or updated data that can be used for the next revision. Seafood Watch and Seafood Reports are made possible through a grant from the David and Lucile Packard Foundation. 2 Final Seafood Recommendation Although there are many snappers caught in the U.S., only the three most commercially important species relative to landed weight and value (red snapper (Lutjanus campechanus), vermilion snapper (Rhomboplites aurorubens), and yellowtail snapper (Ocyurus chrysurus) are discussed here. This report discusses snapper caught in the South Atlantic (SA) and Gulf of Mexico (GOM) by vertical gear types including hydraulic/electric reel, rod and reel, and handline. Snapper caught by bottom longline in the GOM and SA will not be discussed since it makes up a statistically insignificant proportion of the total snapper catch in the GOM and in the SA bottom longline fishing in waters shallower than 50 fathoms, where snapper are generally caught, is prohibited.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 RED SNAPPER – Lutjanus Spp. Depending on Language And
    RED SNAPPER – Lutjanus spp. Depending on language and location, the name Red Snapper applies to a number of fish species across the globe within the Lutjanidae family, and refers to those snappers that exhibit a red coloration as adults. Species falling under the title “red snapper” include: • Lutjanus campechanus (Northern red snapper; found in the Western Atlantic from the Gulf of Mexico and southeastern USA to the northern coast of South America) • Lutjanus argentimaculatus (Mangrove red snapper; found in the Indo-West Pacific from East Africa to Southeast Asia and south to the northern coasts of Australia) • Lutjanus purpureus (Southern red snapper; found in the Caribbean Sea to the northeast coast of South America) • Lutjanus buccanella (Blackfin snapper; found in the Western Atlantic from the Gulf of Mexico and southeastern USA to the northern coast of South America) • Lutjanus bohar (Two-spot red snapper; found in the Indo-Pacific from East Africa to the Pacific islands south to Australia. • Lutjanus erhrytropterus (Crimson red snapper; found in the Western Pacific and Indian Oceans, from the Gulf of Oman to Japan and northern Australia) • Lutjanus malabaricus (Malabar blood snapper; found in the Western Pacific, where it is found east to Fiji and Japan, and Indian Ocean, where it occurs west to the Persian Gulf and Arabian Sea). Snappers are an extremely important fishery resource in the geographies where they are found, contributing to production for both local consumption as well as export markets. Red snappers are one of the most valuable and widely recognized members among the Lutjanidae, although the common name “red snapper” pertains to, and are sometimes used indistinctively for, several distinct species.
    [Show full text]
  • Vi Iberian Congress of Murcia 2016 Ichthyology
    Financiación: GOBIERNO MINISTERIO CONFEDERACIÓN DE ESPAÑA DE AGRICULTURA, ALIMENTACIÓN HIDROGRÁFICA Y MEDIO AMBIENTE DEL SEGURA / MURCIA VI IBERIAN CONGRESS OF MURCIA 2016 ICHTHYOLOGY BOOK SUMMARIES VI IBERIAN CONGRESS OF ICHTHYOLOGY / MURCIA 21st to 24th June 2016 Auditorium and Congress Centre Victor Villegas Murcia (Spain) VI IBERIAN CONGRESS OF ICHTHYOLOGY / MURCIA PRESIDENTA DEL VI CONGRESO IBÉRICO DE ICTIOLOGÍA Mar Torralva Forero, Universidad de Murcia COORDINA • Mar Torralva Forero, Universidad de Murcia • Ana Sánchez Pérez, Universidad de Murcia • José Manuel Zamora Marín, Universidad de Murcia • Antonio Zamora López, Universidad de Murcia • Fátima Amat Trigo, Universidad de Murcia • Eduardo Lafuente Sacristán, Confederación Hidrográfica del Segura • Francisco José Oliva Paterna, Universidad de Murcia EDITA Sociedad Ibérica de Ictiología, SIBIC Este trabajo es resultado de la ayuda 19940/OC/15 financiada por la Fundación Séneca-Agencia de Ciencia y Tecnología de la Región de Murcia con cargo al Programa “Jiménez de la Espada” de Movilidad, Cooperación e Internacionalización. COMITÉ ORGANIZADOR Secretaria • Ana Sánchez Pérez, Universidad de Murcia Vocales • Ana Ruiz Navarro, Universidad de Murcia • Cristina González Muñoz, Confederación Hidrográfica del Segura • Eduardo Lafuente Sacristán, Confederación Hidrográfica del Segura • Fátima Amat Trigo, Universidad de Murcia • Filipe Martinho, Universidad de Coimbra • Francisco José Oliva Paterna, Universidad de Murcia • Frederic Casals Martí, Universidad de Lleida • Jaime Fraile Jiménez
    [Show full text]
  • Lutjanus Vivanus (Cuvier, 1828) LTJ Frequent Synonyms / Misidentifications: None / Lutjanus Campechanus (Poey, 1860), Lutjanus Purpureus (Poey, 1866)
    click for previous page Perciformes: Percoidei: Lutjanidae 1499 Lutjanus vivanus (Cuvier, 1828) LTJ Frequent synonyms / misidentifications: None / Lutjanus campechanus (Poey, 1860), Lutjanus purpureus (Poey, 1866). FAO names: En - Silk snapper; Fr - Vivaneau soie; Sp - Pargo de lo alto. Diagnostic characters: Vomer and palatines with teeth, those on vomer in anchor-shaped patch with posterior extension on median line; no teeth on ectopterygoids. Maxilla without scales. Gill rakers on first arch 6 to 9 on upper limb and 16 or 17on lower limb, total 22 to 25. Dorsal fin single, spinous portion of fin not deeply incised at its junction with soft portion. Last soft ray of both dorsal and anal fins not elongated. Anal fin angulated in specimens more than about 6 cm standard length. Caudal fin lunate. Dorsal fin with 10 spines and 14, occasionally 13, soft rays. Anal fin with 3 spines and 8, rarely 7, soft rays.Pectoral fin with 16 to 18, usually 17, rays. Membranes of soft dorsal and anal fins with scales. Tubed scales in lateral line 47 to 50. Rows of lateral scales 50 to 53, most frequently 51; scales above lateral line 10 to 12; scales below lateral line 20 to 24; sum of rows of lateral scales and scales above and below lateral line 82 to 87, rarely 81 or 88. Colour: back and upper sides red to pink;lower sides and belly lighter;body sometimes with alter- nating red and white bars; iris of eye bright yellow; dark spot below anterior part of soft dorsal fin (per- sisting to about 20 to 25 cm standard length), spot usually black, occasionally red; fins mostly reddish, dorsal and anal fins with some yellow, posterior margin of caudal fin sometimes deep red or dusky, pectoral fins pale yellow.
    [Show full text]
  • Lack of Spatial Subdivision for the Snapper Lutjanus Purpureus (Lutjanidae – Perciformes) from Southwest Atlantic Based on Multi-Locus Analyses
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Lack of Spatial Subdivision for the Snapper Lutjanus purpureus (Lutjanidae – Perciformes) from Southwest Atlantic Based on Multi-Locus Analyses Raimundo da Silva1☯, Iracilda Sampaio2‡, Horacio Schneider2‡, Grazielle Gomes1☯* 1 Laboratório de Genética Aplicada, Campus Bragança, Universidade Federal do Pará, Bragança, Pará, Brasil, 2 Laboratório de Genética e Biologia Molecular, Campus Bragança, Universidade Federal do Pará, Bragança, Pará, Brasil a11111 ☯ These authors contributed equally to this work. ‡ These authors also contributed equally to this work. * [email protected] Abstract OPEN ACCESS The Caribbean snapper Lutjanus purpureus is a marine species fish commonly found associ- Citation: da Silva R, Sampaio I, Schneider H, Gomes ated with rocky seabeds and is widely distributed along of Western Atlantic. Data on stock G (2016) Lack of Spatial Subdivision for the Snapper Lutjanus purpureus (Lutjanidae – Perciformes) from delineation and stock recognition are essential for establishing conservation measures for Southwest Atlantic Based on Multi-Locus Analyses. commercially fished species. However, few studies have investigated the population genetic PLoS ONE 11(8): e0161617. doi:10.1371/journal. structure of this economically valuable species, and previous studies (based on only a portion pone.0161617 of the mitochondrial DNA) provide an incomplete picture. The present study used a multi- Editor: Michael Knapp, University of Otago, NEW locus approach (12 segments of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA) to elucidate the levels of ZEALAND genetic diversity and genetic connectivity of L. purpureus populations and their demographic Received: March 7, 2016 history. L. purpureus has high levels of genetic diversity, which probably implies in high effec- Accepted: August 9, 2016 tive population sizes values for the species.
    [Show full text]
  • Composition of the Fish Fauna in a Tropical Estuary: the Ecological Guild Approach
    SCIENTIA MARINA 83(2) June 2019, 133-142, Barcelona (Spain) ISSN-L: 0214-8358 https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.04855.25A Composition of the fish fauna in a tropical estuary: the ecological guild approach 1 2 3 1 Valdimere Ferreira , François Le Loc’h , Frédéric Ménard , Thierry Frédou , Flávia L. Frédou 1 1 Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE), Rua Dom Manuel de Medeiros, s/n, 52171-900, Recife, Brazil. (VF) (Corresponding author) E-mail: [email protected]. ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5051-9439 (TF) E-mail: [email protected]. ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0510-6424 (FLF) E-mail: [email protected]. ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5492-7205 2 IRD, Univ. Brest, CNRS, Ifremer, UMR LEMAR, F-29280 Plouzané, France. (FLL) E-mail: [email protected]. ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3372-6997 3 Aix Marseille Univ., Université de Toulon, CNRS, IRD, UMR MIO, Marseille, France. (FM) E-mail: [email protected]. ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1162-660X Summary: Ecological guilds have been widely applied for understanding the structure and functioning of aquatic ecosys- tems. This study describes the composition and the spatio-temporal changes in the structure of the fish fauna and the move- ments between the estuary and the coast of a tropical estuary, the Itapissuma/Itamaracá Complex (IIC) in northeastern Brazil. Fish specimens were collected during the dry and rainy seasons in 2013 and 2014. A total of 141 species of 34 families were recorded. Almost half of the species (66 species, 47%) were exclusive to the estuary and 50 species (35%) to the coast; 25 (18%) were common to both environments.
    [Show full text]