The Best of Both Worlds: a Critical Pedagogy of Place by Davida
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
American Educational Research Association http://www.jstor.org/stable/3700002 . Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. American Educational Research Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Educational Researcher. http://www.jstor.org The Best of Both Worlds: A Critical Pedagogy of Place by DavidA. Gruenewald Takingthe position that "criticalpedagogy" and "place-basededu- analyzinghow economicand politicaldecisions impact particu- cation" are mutuallysupportive educationaltraditions, this author lar places (Berry, 1992; Haas & Nachtigal, 1998; Orr, 1992; arguesfor a conscious synthesisthat blendsthe two discourses into Theobald,1997). Place,in otherwords, foregrounds a narrative of local and that is attunedto the a critical pedagogy of place. An analysisof critical pedagogy is pre- regionalpolitics particularities of wherepeople actually live, and that is connectedto globalde- sented that emphasizesthe spatialaspects of social experience. This velopmenttrends that impactlocal places.Articulating a critical examinationalso asserts the general absence of ecological thinking pedagogyof place is thus a responseagainst educational reform demonstrated in critical social analysisconcerned exclusively with policies and practicesthat disregardplaces and that leave as- humanrelationships. Next, a discussionof ecologicalplace-based ed- sumptions about the relationshipbetween education and the ucation is offered. Finally,a criticalpedagogy of place is defined.This politicsof economicdevelopment unexamined. Unlike critical which evolves from the well- pedagogyseeks the twin objectives of decolonizationand "reinhab- pedagogy, establisheddiscourse of criticaltheory (Aronowitz& Giroux, itation" criticaland A through synthesizing place-basedapproaches. 1993; Burbules& Berk,1999; Freire,1970/1995; Giroux, 1988; of all educators to reflect on the criticalpedagogy place challenges McLaren,2003), place-basededucation lacks a specifictheoretical relationshipbetween the kindof educationthey pursue and the kind tradition,though this is partlya matterof naming.Its practices and of places we inhabitand leave behindfor future generations. purposescan be connectedto experientiallearning, contextual learning,problem-based learning, constructivism, outdoor educa- tion, indigenouseducation, environmental and ecologicaleduca- tion, bioregionaleducation, democratic education, multicultural "Place+ people = politics."-Williams (2001, p. 3) education,community-based education, critical pedagogy itself, as n this article I analyze and synthesize elements of two distinct well as otherapproaches that areconcerned with contextand the literatures, critical pedagogy and place-based education, and valueof learningfrom and nurturing specific places, communities, argue that their convergence into a critical pedagogy of place or regions. In recent literature,educators claiming place as a offers a much needed framework for educational theory, research, guidingconstruct associate a place-basedapproach with outdoor policy, and practice. Place-basedpedagogies are needed so that the (Woodhouse & Knapp, 2000), environmentaland ecological education of citizens might have some direct bearing on the well- (Orr, 1992, 1994; Sobel, 1996; Thomashow,1996), and rural being of the social and ecological places people actually inhabit. education(Haas & Nachtigal, 1998; Theobald, 1997). One re- Critical pedagogies are needed to challenge the assumptions, prac- sult of theseprimarily ecological and ruralassociations has been tices, and outcomes taken for granted in dominant culture and in that place-basededucation is frequentlydiscussed at a distance conventional education. Chief among these are the assumptions fromthe urban,multicultural arena, territory most often claimed that education should mainly support individualistic and na- by criticalpedagogues. If place-basededucation emphasizes eco- tionalistic competition in the global economy and that an edu- logical and ruralcontexts, criticalpedagogy-in a near mirror cational competition of winners and losers is in the best interest image-emphasizes socialand urbancontexts and often neglects of public life in a diverse society.' The current educational re- the ecologicaland ruralscene entirely.As leadingcritical peda- form era of standards and testing that began nearly 20 years ago goguesMcLaren and Giroux(1990) themselvesobserve, this em- with the publication ofA Nation at Risk is perhaps reaching a cli- phasisrepresents a "profoundirony": max in the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. One result of new Whilecritical pedagogy in itsearly stages largely grew out of theef- federal mandates for accountability is an increasing emphasis on fortsof PauloFreire and his literacycampaigns among peasants in standards, testing, and classroom pedagogies that "teach to the ruralareas of Brasiland other Third World countries, subsequent test" while denying students and teachers opportunities to expe- generationsof NorthAmerican teachers and cultural workers in- rience critical or place-based education.2 fluencedby Freire'swork have directedmost of their attentionto Currently, educational concern for local space is overshad- urbanminority populations in majormetropolitan centers. Very owed by both the discourse of accountability and by the dis- littlewriting exists that deals with criticalpedagogy in the rural course of economic competitiveness to which it is linked. Place schoolclassroom and community. (p. 154) becomes a critical construct not because it is in opposition to eco- By pointingout distinctiveemphases of eachtradition, I do not nomic well-being (it is not), but because it focuses attention on mean to set up a falsedichotomy between them or to chargeei- thercamp with a narrowvision of appropriatecontext. Certainly EducationalResearcher, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp.3-12 beforeand since McLarenand Giroux (1990) were "struck"by Z AY2O3Z~I the ironyof Freirean,rural pedagogy taking a chieflyurban turn, to reflecton how thesetwin agendas,and the critical,place-based educatorshave applied constructs and approachestypically asso- traditionsthey represent,challenge all of our work. ciated with critical to examinerural education pedagogy (e.g., Critical Pedagogy's Sociological Context Theobald, 1990).3Especially with the recentgrowth of interest With roots in Marxistand neo-Marxistcritical theory, critical in migranteducation, issues of race,class, gender, and corporate pedagogyrepresents a transformationaleducational response to hegemonyhave become centralto interrogatingrural commu- institutionaland ideologicaldomination, especially under capi- nity life and education (Lopez, Scribner,& Mahitivanichcha, talism.Burbules and Berk(1999) write that criticalpedagogy is 2001; Weyer,2002). Similarly,some place-basededucators are undoubtedlyFreirian "cultural workers" (Freire, 1998); these ed- aneffort to workwithin educational institutions and other media ucatorsoften embraceurban contexts and areinvolved in ecolog- to raise questions about inequalitiesof power, about the false andabout the icalprojects such as redressingenvironmental racism, organizing mythsof opportunityand merit for many students, belief become internalizedto the where indi- communitygardens, and initiatingother communitydevelop- way systems point viduals and abandon the very aspirationto question or ment activitiesthat make urbanand rural,social and groups ecological changetheir lot in life.(p. 50) connections(Hart, 1997; Smith, 2002; Smith& Williams,1999). However,despite clear areas of overlapbetween critical pedagogy The leadersof the movement, including Freire,Giroux, and andplace-based education (such as the importanceof situatedcon- McLaren,insist that educationis alwayspolitical, and that ed- text and the goalof socialtrans- ucators and students should formation),significant strands become "transformative intel- exist within each traditionthat lectuals" (Giroux, 1988), "cul- do not always recognize the Place-based pedagogies tural workers" (Freire, 1998) potential contributionsof the capable of identifying and re- other. On the one hand, criti- are needed so that the dressing the injustices, inequal- cal pedagogy often betrays a ities, and myths of an often sweepingdisinterest in the fact oppressiveworld. that human culture has been, education of citizens For Freire (1970/1995), crit- ical with rec- is, and alwayswill be nested in pedagogy begins that human ecological systems (Bowers, ognizing beings, might have some direct and learners, exist in a cultural 1997, In a 2001).4 parallelstory context: of neglect, place-basededuca- bearing on the well-being tion hasdeveloped an ecological People as beings "in a sit- and ruralemphasis that is often uation," find themselves insulatedfrom the culturalcon- of the social and rooted in temporal-spatial flicts inherent in dominant conditionswhich markthem Americanculture. Additionally, and which they also mark. ecological places people They will tend to reflect on in its focus on local, ecological their own "situationality"to experience, place-based