English Walnut Rootstocks Help Avoid Blackline Disease, but Produce Less Than ‘Paradox’ Hybrid

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

English Walnut Rootstocks Help Avoid Blackline Disease, but Produce Less Than ‘Paradox’ Hybrid RESEARCH ARTICLE ▼ English walnut rootstocks help avoid blackline disease, but produce less than ‘Paradox’ hybrid Joseph A. Grant Gale H. McGranahan ▼ While ‘Paradox’ hybrid seedlings are often the rootstocks of choice for California walnut orchards, there is a resurgence of interest in using English walnut seedlings because walnut blackline disease, which is endemic in many California walnut production districts, does not affect them. We compared the growth and productivity of walnuts on English rootstocks from a variety of sources to those on Paradox rootstock. The growth and productivity of ‘Chandler’ walnut trees were similar among trees on seedling English rootstocks in one trial, but trees on English rootstocks were smaller and had lower production than Paradox John M. Mircetich John M. hybrid–rooted trees in the other. alifornia’s first walnut trees and orchards were planted during the SpanishC mission period (around 1800), using seedlings of early varieties of Persian or English walnut (Juglans regia) chosen for their superior growth and nut quality. Since the 1890s, walnut trees in California have been propagated by grafting or budding desired cultivars onto rootstocks chosen for their adapta- tion to different physical, chemical or biological soil conditions at individual orchard sites. From the early to mid- Blackline-infected trees on, above left, black walnut, and, above right, ‘Paradox’ rootstocks are slowly girdled by the death of rootstock tissue at the graft union. Top, over time, wal- 20th century, seedlings of Northern nut trees with blackline decline in vigor, leading to dieback of branches and, ultimately, California black walnut (Juglans hindsii) death of the tree. Trees on English rootstocks develop no graft union symptoms and escape were used as rootstocks because they the debilitating effects of blackline infection. grew vigorously and were more tolerant of saline and saturated soil and more used occasionally. Paradox seedlings on black or English walnut rootstocks, resistant to soil-borne pests than English are hybrids of black and English wal- are more resistant to Phythophthora walnut seedlings. nuts, and the rootstocks are grown by root and crown rot disease, and are Since the 1950s, ‘Paradox’ hybrid nurseries using seed nuts collected more tolerant of lesion nematode seedlings have supplanted black and from black walnut trees, particularly J. (Pratylenchus vulnus), both of which English walnut as rootstocks of choice hindsii (Potter et al. 2002) pollinated by are widely distributed and problem- for California orchards, though black English walnut pollen. Paradox-rooted atic in California orchards (Browne et walnut (J. hindsii and others) is still trees grow more vigorously than those al. 1977; McGranahan and Catlin 1987; http://CaliforniaAgriculture.ucop.edu • OCTOBER–DECEMBER 2005 249 TABLE 1. English seedling rootstocks used in the study came from a variety of commercial nursery sources Seedling rootstock Source Site 1 Eureka Visalia, Calif. Manregian Davis, Calif. Spanish Tarragona, Spain Ronde de Montignac France Corne France Site 2 Paradox Modesto, Calif. Carpathian Loomis, Wash. Russian Loomis, Wash. Waterloo Modesto, Calif. Sunland Modesto, Calif. Eureka Gridley, Calif. Chandler Modesto, Calif. Serr and Rizzi 1964). Because of their generally poor performance, both in Fig. 1. Average trunk diameter (top) and nut production (bottom) of experimental controlled experiments and limited trees at site 1 (left) and site 2 (right). Columns headed by common letters indicate commercial orchard use, English seed- cumulative yields that are not significantly different (Fisher’s protected LSD, P ≤ 0.05). lings are now used only occasionally as walnut rootstocks in California. English walnut sources as rootstocks for suppliers (McGranahan and Leslie The recent resurgence of interest walnuts in California. The identifica- 1990), and Paradox hybrid seedlings in using English walnut seedlings as tion of a source of English walnut with from a California nursery. Experimental rootstocks in California is a result of superior vigor, productivity and pest plots were in five alternate rows in a the discovery in the 1970s that walnut tolerance could provide walnut growers solid Chandler planting. blackline disease, caused by cherry in areas of high CLRV incidence with an The trials at both sites were config- leafroll virus (CLRV), was endemic in acceptable alternative to the hypersensi- ured as randomized complete block many California walnut production tive rootstocks currently in use. designs, with three 5-tree plots at site districts. CLRV infection kills tissue at 1 and five 8-tree plots at site 2. Trees Rootstock trials the graft union of trees grown on black for both sites were nursery-propagated walnut and Paradox rootstocks, but Two trials were established in a com- and planted as grafted 2-year-old trees. not those on English walnut rootstock mercial walnut orchard near Linden in Nursery seedlings for both sites were because it is naturally tolerant of CLRV. San Joaquin County. Soil at both test sites tested for CLRV, and infected trees This reaction gradually girdles and kills was Archerdale clay loam. The trials were discarded to prevent the intro- black walnut– and Paradox-rooted trees were in 12-feet-by-24-feet high-density duction of blackline virus disease to (Mircetich et al. 1980; Mircetich and “hedgerow” plantings, which were the test orchard. Rowhani 1984). There is some evidence sprinkler-irrigated. Formerly planted to Tree growth was evaluated at both from Europe of adverse impacts due to walnuts, both sites were fumigated with sites by annual trunk-diameter mea- systemic CLRV infection on the growth methyl bromide prior to planting. surements made 12 inches above the of English-rooted trees (Mircetich et al. Site 1 was planted in 1989 and graft union. Yield (in-shell, 8% wet basis 1998). But these effects are not as well consisted of three rows of ‘Chandler’ moisture) was measured at site 1 in 1993, documented as other disadvantages of this trees that had been nursery-grafted 1995, 1997 and 2003, and at site 2 in an- rootstock and, thus, are not considered det- on English walnut seedlings from nually from 1997 through 2003. Growth rimental enough to preclude its use where Manregian and Eureka from California, and yield data from the experimental otherwise indicated. ‘Ronde de Montignac’ and ‘Corne’ from plots were analyzed using two-way Seedlings of ‘Manregian’ and France, and a source collected from analysis of variance and Fisher’s pro- ‘Eureka’ English walnuts have been Tarragona, Spain. Experimental plots tected LSD for mean separation. available to California growers for many were within pollenizer rows planted Tree growth and productivity years. In the 1980s, commercial nurs- every eighth row in a ‘Vina’ orchard eries began offering seedlings from a (table 1). At site 1, there were no significant variety of other English walnut sources Site 2 was planted in 1994 and differences among English-rooted in response to renewed interest stimu- included seedlings from Eureka, trees in annual trunk diameter or nut lated by the discovery and prevalence ‘Waterloo’, Chandler and ‘Sunland’ production (fig. 1). Similarly, at site 2, of blackline disease. We undertook this provided by a California nursery, two English-rooted trees from all sources study to compare the orchard perfor- English walnut sources named ‘Russian’ were similar in trunk diameter dur- mance of seedlings from some of these and ‘Carpathian’ by their respective ing most of the study years (1995 250 CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURE • VOLUME 59, NUMBER 4 Walnut blackline disease, caused by cherry leafroll virus, through 1998, and 2001 through 2003) is endemic in many California walnut-producing districts. (fig. 1). The only significant difference in trunk diameter recorded among This has spurred renewed interest in using English walnut English-rooted trees was in 1999 and seedlings as rootstocks. 2000 at site 2, when trees on Chandler seedlings were smaller than those on Waterloo seedlings. In contrast, trees and nut production as a result of plant- References on Paradox seedlings had significantly ing English seedling rootstocks. Browne LT, Brown LC, Ramos DE. 1977. Walnut rootstocks compared. Cal Ag larger trunk diameters than those on However, it remains to be deter- 31(7):14–5. any of the English rootstocks from 1996 mined — in this trial as well as in com- McGranahan GH, Catlin PB. 1987. Juglans through 2003. mercial practice — whether the growth rootstocks. In: Rom RC, Carlson RF (eds.). Individual year yields at site 2 were and yield advantages of Paradox-rooted Rootstocks for Fruit Crops. New York: Wiley. p 411–50. not significantly different among root- trees will be outweighed by the po- McGranahan GH, Leslie C. 1990. Walnuts stocks in 1997, 1999 or 2003. Paradox- tentially longer life of English-rooted (Juglans L.). In: Moore JN, Ballington JR rooted trees had significantly greater trees, since blackline incidence increases (eds.). Genetic Resources of Temperate Fruit yields than trees on all English root- over the life of the orchard. In addi- & Nut Crops. Acta Hort 290(2). Int Soc Hort Sci, Wageningen. p 907–51. stock sources in 2000 and 2001, and all tion, because English-rooted trees are Mircetich SM, Rowhani A. 1984. The rela- but those on Carpathian seedlings in still considered more susceptible to tionship of cherry leafroll virus and blackline 1998 and Russian and Carpathian seed- Phytophthora root and crown rot, and disease of English walnut trees. Phytopath 74:423–8. lings in 2002. Individual year yields to damage by lesion nematode, growers Mircetich SM, Rowhani A, Civerolo EL, Ra- were similar among English sources must carefully evaluate all the ramifi- mos DE. 1998. Blackline disease. In: Ramos DE except for in 2000 and 2001, when cations of their rootstock choice when (ed.). Walnut Orchard Management. UC ANR Chandler-rooted trees had significantly planning a new orchard. Pub 3373, Oakland, CA. p 233–41. Mircetich SM, Sanborn RR, Ramos DE. lower yields than Carpathian-rooted 1980.
Recommended publications
  • Heterodichogamy.Pdf
    Research Update TRENDS in Ecology & Evolution Vol.16 No.11 November 2001 595 How common is heterodichogamy? Susanne S. Renner The sexual systems of plants usually Heterodichogamy differs from normal (Zingiberales). These figures probably depend on the exact spatial distribution of dichogamy, the temporal separation of underestimate the frequency of the gamete-producing structures. Less well male and female function in flowers, in heterodichogamy. First, the phenomenon known is how the exact timing of male and that it involves two genetic morphs that is discovered only if flower behavior is female function might influence plant occur at a 1:1 ratio. The phenomenon was studied in several individuals and in mating. New papers by Li et al. on a group discovered in walnuts and hazelnuts5,6 natural populations. Differential of tropical gingers describe differential (the latter ending a series of Letters to movements and maturation of petals, maturing of male and female structures, the Editor about hazel flowering that styles, stigmas and stamens become such that half the individuals of a began in Nature in 1870), but has gone invisible in dried herbarium material, population are in the female stage when almost unnoticed7. Indeed, its recent and planted populations deriving from the other half is in the male stage. This discovery in Alpinia was greeted as a vegetatively propagated material no new case of heterodichogamy is unique new mechanism, differing ‘from other longer reflect natural morph ratios. The in involving reciprocal movement of the passive outbreeding devices, such as discovery of heterodichogamy thus styles in the two temporal morphs. dichogamy…and heterostyly in that it depends on field observations.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Phylogenetic Relationships in the Walnut Family Based on Internal Transcribed Spacer Sequences and Secondary Structures(ITS2)
    Analysis of Phylogenetic Relationships in The Walnut Family Based on Internal Transcribed Spacer Sequences and Secondary Structures(ITS2) Zhongzhong Guo Tarim University Qiang Jin Tarim University Zhenkun Zhao Tarim University Wenjun Yu Tarim University Gen Li Tarim University Yunjiang Cheng Tarim University Cuiyun Wu Tarim University rui Zhang ( [email protected] ) Tarim University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4360-5179 Research Article Keywords: Base sequence, Evolution, Juglandaceae, Ribosomal spacer, Secondary structure Posted Date: May 13th, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-501634/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/23 Abstract This study aims to investigate the phylogenetic relationships within the Juglandaceae family based on the Internal Transcribed Spacer's primary sequence and secondary structures (ITS2). Comparative analysis of 51 Juglandaceae species was performed across most of the dened seven genera. The results showed that the ITS2 secondary structure's folding pattern was highly conserved and congruent with the eukaryote model. Firstly, Neighbor-joining (N.J.) analysis recognized two subfamilies: Platycaryoideae and Engelhardioideae. The Platycaryoideae included the Platycaryeae (Platycarya+ (Carya+ Annamocarya)) and Juglandeae (Juglans-(Cyclocarya + Pterocarya)). The Engelhardioideae composed the (Engelhardia+Oreomunnea+Alfaroa)). The Rhoiptelea genus was generally regarded as an outgroup when inferring the phylogeny of Juglandaceae. However, it is clustered into the Juglandaceae family and showed a close relationship with the Platycaryoideae subfamily. Secondly, the folded 3-helices and 4-helices secondary structure of ITS2 were founded in the Juglandaceae family. Therefore, these ITS2 structures could be used as formal evidence to analyze Juglandaceae's phylogeny relationship.
    [Show full text]
  • Walnut Jardin Botanique´ – Montreal, Quebec
    Juglans nigra – Black Walnut Jardin Botanique´ – Montreal, Quebec THE JUGLANDACEAE – WALNUTS AND HICKORIES By Susan McDougall 1 Daddy’s work was physically demanding. He was a builder of houses – “spec” houses, as they were known – meaning he bought land, acquired a bank loan, and built houses one at a time, selling them to repay the loan and provide his family with a modest living. After selling one or sometimes before a sale, he would move on to the next project. It was an uncertain life, for then as now, quality homes had to compete with mass production. And, to keep costs down, Daddy performed nearly all the work himself. Occasionally I would visit the construction site, but the most meaningful memories are of daddy arriving home, parking the car out front (no garage or truck in the early years), and coming into a warm house in winter and a shaded one in summer. He worked the year round in the Pacific Northwest - winter rains and summer heat were no deterrent. After greetings and dinner, I would return to my room and daddy would head for his rocking chair in the corner of the living room, happy to read the newspaper or a book. But as I played or studied, occasionally I would hear another sound besides the occasional slow breathing of a tired man nodding off, or the turning of the newspaper pages. It was a cracking/crunching and comforting, reassuring sound. Daddy was eating walnuts, fresh from the shell. Old nutcracker used by my Dad The walnut shells did not give up the kernel within easily, but they could be broken open along a suture line with the simplest of tools.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Impact of Walnut Twig Beetle in Urban Forest, Orchard, and Native Forest Ecosystems
    J. For. 117(2):152–163 BARK BEETLE SPECIAL SECTION doi: 10.1093/jofore/fvy081 Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of American Foresters 2019. Tis work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US. entomology Status and Impact of Walnut Twig Beetle in Urban Forest, Orchard, and Native Forest Ecosystems Steven J. Seybold, William E. Klingeman III, Stacy M. Hishinuma, Tom W. Coleman, and Andrew D. Graves The walnut twig beetle, a native phloem-boring bark beetle originating on Arizona walnut, has invaded urban, is fatal to walnut trees (Figure 2) and was frst orchard, and native forest habitats throughout the USA as well as in Italy. Although the beetle has been associated noted in the late 2000s for its involvement with dead and dying walnut trees indigenous to riparian forests of the Southwest, the primary impact appears to in the gradual deterioration and mortality of have been on the health of landscape black walnut trees in urban and peri-urban sites in western US states, and several species of black walnut in the west- in Pennsylvania, Tennessee, and Virginia. This has been refected in numbers of trees removed and tree removal ern United States (Graves et al. 2009, Flint costs. In addition, trees have been killed in the primary US Juglans germplasm repository in northern California, et al. 2010, Tisserat et al. 2011, Seybold and low, but measureable, tree mortality has occurred in some English walnut orchards in California’s Central Valley. et al. 2013b).
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Genome Based Insights Into the Phylogeny and Evolution of the Juglandaceae
    Whole Genome based Insights into the Phylogeny and Evolution of the Juglandaceae Huijuan Zhou Northwest A&F University: Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University Yiheng Hu Northwestern University Aziz Ebrahimi Purdue University Peiliang Liu Northwestern University Keith Woeste Purdue University Shuoxin Zhang Northwest A&F University: Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University Peng Zhao ( [email protected] ) Northwest University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3033-6982 Research article Keywords: Diversication, Divergence time, Genome, Juglandaceae, Phylogenomics, Plastome Posted Date: May 24th, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-495294/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/23 Abstract Background: The walnut family (Juglandaceae) contains commercially important woody trees commonly called walnut, wingnut, pecan and hickory. Phylogenetic relationships in the Juglandaceae are problematic, and their historical diversication has not been claried, in part because of low phylogenetic resolution and/or insucient marker variability. Results: We reconstructed the backbone phylogenetic relationships of Juglandaceae using organelle and nuclear genome data from 27 species. The divergence time of Juglandaceae was estimated to be 78.7 Mya. The major lineages diversied in warm and dry habitats during the mid-Paleocene and early Eocene. The plastid, mitochondrial, and nuclear phylogenetic analyses all revealed three subfamilies, i.e., Juglandoideae, Engelhardioideae, Rhoipteleoideae. Five genera of Juglandoideae were strongly supported. Juglandaceae were estimated to have originated during the late Cretaceous, while Juglandoideae were estimated to have originated during the Paleocene, with evidence for rapid diversication events during several glacial and geological periods. The phylogenetic analyses of organelle sequences and nuclear genome yielded highly supported incongruence positions for J.
    [Show full text]
  • International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants
    E TG/JUGLA(proj.5) ORIGINAL: English DATE: 2019-14-06 INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NEW VARIETIES OF PLANTS Geneva Inexpert red revisionJune 2019 by Spanish DRAFT * BLACK WALNUT UPOV Code(s): JUGLA_HIN; JUGLA_HRE; JUGLA_MAJ; JUGLA_MRG; JUGLA_NIG; JUGLA_NRE Juglans hindsii (Jeps.) R. E. Sm.; Juglans hindsii × Juglans regia; Juglans major (Torr.) A. Heller; Juglans major x Juglans regia; Juglans nigra L.; Juglans nigra Juglans regia x L. GUIDELINES FOR THE CONDUCT OF TESTS FOR DISTINCTNESS, UNIFORMITY AND STABILITY to be considered by the Technical Working Party for Fruit Crops at its fiftieth session, to be held in Budapest, Hungary, from 2019-06-24 to 2019-06-28 Disclaimer: this document does not represent UPOV policies or guidance * These names were correct at the time of the introduction of these Test Guidelines but may be revised or updated. [Readers are advised to consult the UPOV Code, which can be found on the UPOV Website (www.upov.int), for the latest information.] TG/JUGLA(proj.5) Black Walnut, 2019-06-14 2 Alternative names:* Botanical name English French German Spanish Juglans hindsii (Jeps.) Hinds's black walnut; kalifornische Walnuß R. E. Sm. Hinds's walnut; northern California black walnut; northern California walnut Juglans hindsii × Juglans regia; Juglans ×paradox Burbank Juglans major (Torr.) Arizona walnut A. Heller Juglans major x Juglans regia Juglans nigra L. Black Walnut Noyer noir Schwarznuss Nogal negro Juglans nigra x Juglans regia L.; Juglans ×intermedia Jacques The purpose of these guidelines (“Test Guidelines”) is to elaborate the principles contained in the General Introduction (document TG/1/3), and its associated TGP documents, into detailed practical guidance for the harmonized examination of distinctness, uniformity and stability (DUS) and, in particular, to identify appropriate characteristics for the examination of DUS and production of harmonized variety descriptions.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Material
    Xiang et al., Page S1 Supporting Information Fig. S1. Examples of the diversity of diaspore shapes in Fagales. Fig. S2. Cladogram of Fagales obtained from the 5-marker data set. Fig. S3. Chronogram of Fagales obtained from analysis of the 5-marker data set in BEAST. Fig. S4. Time scale of major fagalean divergence events during the past 105 Ma. Fig. S5. Confidence intervals of expected clade diversity (log scale) according to age of stem group. Fig. S6. Evolution of diaspores types in Fagales with BiSSE model. Fig. S7. Evolution of diaspores types in Fagales with Mk1 model. Fig. S8. Evolution of dispersal modes in Fagales with MuSSE model. Fig. S9. Evolution of dispersal modes in Fagales with Mk1 model. Fig. S10. Reconstruction of pollination syndromes in Fagales with BiSSE model. Fig. S11. Reconstruction of pollination syndromes in Fagales with Mk1 model. Fig. S12. Reconstruction of habitat shifts in Fagales with MuSSE model. Fig. S13. Reconstruction of habitat shifts in Fagales with Mk1 model. Fig. S14. Stratigraphy of fossil fagalean genera. Table S1 Genera of Fagales indicating the number of recognized and sampled species, nut sizes, habits, pollination modes, and geographic distributions. Table S2 List of taxa included in this study, sources of plant material, and GenBank accession numbers. Table S3 Primers used for amplification and sequencing in this study. Table S4 Fossil age constraints utilized in this study of Fagales diversification. Table S5 Fossil fruits reviewed in this study. Xiang et al., Page S2 Table S6 Statistics from the analyses of the various data sets. Table S7 Estimated ages for all families and genera of Fagales using BEAST.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded From
    UCLA UCLA Previously Published Works Title Threats of future climate change and land use to vulnerable tree species native to Southern California Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4sp094dn Journal Environmental Conservation, 42(2) ISSN 0376-8929 Authors Riordan, EC Gillespie, TW Pitcher, LH et al. Publication Date 2014-08-20 DOI 10.1017/S0376892914000265 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Environmental Conservation (2015) 42 (2): 127–138 C Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2014 doi:10.1017/S0376892914000265 Threats of future climate change and land use to vulnerable tree species native to Southern California ERIN C. RIORDAN1 , THOMAS W. GILLESPIE2 ∗, LINCOLN PITCHER2 , STEPHANIE S. PINCETL3 , G. DARREL JENERETTE4 AND DIANE E. PATAKI5 1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA, 2Department of Geography, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA, 3Institute of the Environment and Sustainability, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA, 4Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, USA and 5Department of Biology, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA Date submitted: 11 November 2013; Date accepted: 16 June 2104; First published online 20 August 2014 SUMMARY loss in Mediterranean-climate ecosystems by the end of this century (Sala et al. 2000), successful conservation planning Climate and land-use changes are expected to drive needs to address the potential future impacts of both drivers. high rates of environmental change and biodiversity While many studies focus on projected climate change impacts loss in Mediterranean ecosystems this century.
    [Show full text]
  • Hybridization Between Native and Non-Native Plant Species in the Riparian Ecosystem Project Information
    Hybridization between native and non-native plant species in the riparian ecosystem Project Information 1. Proposal Title: Hybridization between native and non-native plant species in the riparian ecosystem 2. Proposal applicants: Kristina Schierenbeck, California State University, Chico 3. Corresponding Contact Person: Kristina Schierenbeck Calif. State Univ. Chico Dept. of Biological Sciences Chico, CA 95929-0515 530 898-6410 [email protected] 4. Project Keywords: At-risk species, plants Genetic Conservation and Engineering Nonnative Invasive Species 5. Type of project: Research 6. Does the project involve land acquisition, either in fee or through a conservation easement? No 7. Topic Area: Non-Native Invasive Species 8. Type of applicant: University 9. Location - GIS coordinates: Latitude: 40.0 Longitude: -121.5 Datum: Describe project location using information such as water bodies, river miles, road intersections, landmarks, and size in acres. in riparian corridors along Sacramento River and its tributaries 10. Location - Ecozone: 3.3 Chico Landing to Colusa, 4.1 Clear Creek, 7.3 Mill Creek, 7.4 Deer Creek, 7.5 Big Chico Creek, 7.6 Butte Creek, 8.1 Feather River, 9.2 Lower American River, 10.1 Cache Creek, 10.2 Putah Creek 11. Location - County: Butte, Colusa, Glenn, Plumas, Tehama, Yolo 12. Location - City: Does your project fall within a city jurisdiction? Yes If yes, please list the city: Chico 13. Location - Tribal Lands: Does your project fall on or adjacent to tribal lands? No 14. Location - Congressional District: second 15. Location: California State Senate District Number: 1 California Assembly District Number: 3 16. How many years of funding are you requesting? 3 17.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Temperate Species of Juglans John M. Grimshaw
    Notes on the temperate species of Juglans John M. Grimshaw Introduction The walnuts have always excited interest for their combination of util- ity and beauty, but despite this, most species of Juglans remain little known in cultivation and poorly described in the literature, while specimens in many collections are incorrectly named. This paper aims to clarify the situation with regard to the 11 hardy species and their hybrids. It should be regarded as a supplement to the information provided in the works of Elwes and Henry (1906-1913: vol. II), Bean (1973) and Krüssmann (1985). The taxonomy of Juglans is confused. To a considerable extent this can be attributed to Louis-Albert Dode (1875-1943), a French enthusiast who published his revisions of Juglans in 1906 and 1909, recognizing 44 species. Keen to find differences, he was accordingly prolific in nam- ing new taxa. Walnuts are difficult to study in the herbarium, as the massive stems, large leaves and bulky fruits do not make good dried specimens. Furthermore, the position and vigour of the shoot makes a considerable difference to the size and appearance of the foliage, and a young shoot, perhaps with flowers, looks quite different with its pubescent, unexpanded leaves, to one collected when the foliage has matured. Dode based many of his taxa on fruit characters, but this is again a dangerous area, as although each species has certain parame- ters of variation, there is considerable difference in nut shape and sur- face texture (evident even in commercial supplies of J. regia nuts). Dode, however, did establish the four sections within the genus that are recognized today: Section Juglans (syn.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Phylogeny of Juglans (Juglandaceae): a Biogeographic Perspective
    Tree Genetics & Genomes DOI 10.1007/s11295-006-0078-5 ORIGINAL PAPER Molecular phylogeny of Juglans (Juglandaceae): a biogeographic perspective Mallikarjuna K. Aradhya & Daniel Potter & Fangyou Gao & Charles J. Simon Received: 14 June 2006 /Revised: 23 October 2006 /Accepted: 17 November 2006 # Springer-Verlag 2007 Abstract The eastern Asian and eastern North American bined analyses. Overall, the results suggest that: (1) the disjunction in Juglans offers an opportunity to estimate the NCS sequence divergence observed within and between time since divergence of the Eurasian and American sections of Juglans is low and the addition of matK data lineages and to compare it with paleobotanical evidence. only marginally improved resolution within Rhysocaryon; Five chloroplast DNA noncoding spacer (NCS) sequences: (2) the early divergence of section Juglans in both MP and trnT−trnF, psbA−trnH, atpB−rbcL, trnV-16S rRNA, and ML analyses of NCS and combined data implies its ancient trnS-trnfM and data from earlier studies (matK, ITS, and origin in contrast to fossil evidence, which suggests the nuclear RFLP) were used to reconstruct phylogeny and to earliest divergence of sections Rhysocaryon and Cardio- estimate the divergence time of major lineages. Seventeen caryon; and (3) the extant taxa may not hold the footprints taxa from four sections of Juglans and two outgroup taxa, to unravel the evolutionary history of the genus. Pterocarya stenoptera and Carya illinoiensis were includ- ed. NCS data was congruent only with matK data. Both Keywords Biogeography. Chloroplast DNA . maximum parsimony (MP) and maximum likelihood (ML) Cladogenesis . Disjunction . Juglandaceae . Juglans . cladograms were concordant at the sectional level and Noncoding spacer sequence .
    [Show full text]
  • Walnut Origins, Breeding, and Choosing Varieties
    Walnut Origins, Breeding, and Choosing Varieties UC Davis Walnut Improvement Program Chuck Leslie Patrick J. Brown Walnut evolution Species and geography Breeding varieties Program history Objectives/traits of interest Breeding process Choosing varieties Rootstock development Walnuts Wingnut Pecan 60 Million Years Ago Manos et al. 2007 Early Walnuts of North America Juglans clarnensis John Day, Oregon Walnut Family PterocaryaWingnut Carya J. re gia J. s igillata Persian walnut Juglans 38.73 mya J. hopiensis J. a ilantifolia Asian butternuts J. cathayensisAsian butternuts J. m a ndshuric a Cardiocaryon 29.15 mya J. c alifornica J. c ine rea N. Amer. Butternut J. a us tra lis Trachycaryon J. neotropica J. nigra Four Sections of the Genus J. hindsii J. m a jor Black walnuts J. olanchana Rhysocaryon J. guatemalensis J. m ic roc arpa J. m ollis M. Aradhya 5 changes USDA - NCGR - Davis USDA - NCGR - Davis Rhysocaryon Butternut (J. cinerea) Butternut Canker North American Black Walnuts Northern California Black (Juglans. hindsii) Eastern Black Walnut (J. nigra) Texas Black Walnut (J. microcarpa) South American Black Walnuts J. neotropica –grows at high elevations J. mollis in January – nearly evergreen Asian butternuts J. mandshurica J. ailantifolia J. cathayensis Persian or “English” walnut (J. regia) Native Range of Persian Walnut Collecting Material for Breeding USDA Walnut Germplasm Collection Winters, CA J. major J. hindsii J. ailantifolia J. californica J. microcarpa J. regia Walnut evolution Species and geography Breeding varieties
    [Show full text]