DOCSLIB.ORG

What Is Collaborative Consumption? Platforms and Participation of People in Collaborative Consumption – Impact of the New Technologies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
What Is Collaborative Consumption? Platforms and Participation of People in Collaborative Consumption – Impact of the New Technologies International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, Vol. 9, No. 6, December 2018 What is Collaborative Consumption? Platforms and Participation of People in Collaborative Consumption – Impact of the New Technologies Benson Nwaorgu own automobiles who do not have any services of cars. In Abstract—Collaborative consumption is an emerging new this way, this process has a benefit of the usage of the concept that is based on sharing, renting and borrowing. product by sharing. It also gives a positive impact on the Involvement of a large number of individuals and service surroundings. Additionally, it gives a profit to users who do agencies in collaborative consumption shows the success of it In not need to spend any money on purchase and maintenance this paper, we will focus on what platforms of collaborative of anything. consumption are, which ones are available and who are the In a reshuffling of products, products are reshuffled from participants. The paper also discusses the impact of new technologies on collaborative consumption and we proposed a one place where they are not needed in any other place hypothesis that the concept of CC is evolving with the where they are in a deficiency. This type of service evolvement and the expansion of modern technology systems. remained always present in the market but now the modern New world technologies changed our daily life and additionally technologies have enhanced it in much better ways. changed our ways of consumption. Online web system has Compensation system differs in this new market. Some are changed almost everything in recent years. This paper will totally free while some costs. There are several examples in propose both advantages and disadvantages of technology evolvement and its impact on collaborative consumption. which products are exchanged with other products that have similar worth. Typically the interchange of products occurs Index Terms—Collaborative consumption, sharing among strangers. However, there are some forums where economy, sustainability, internet, new technologies, peer to individuals have a relation with neighbors. peer business. Cooperative lifestyles, some tactile resources are shared like time, space or any skill. However, the web allows individuals to harmonize with each other so a cooperative I. INTRODUCTION lifestyle takes place globally. Community-based peer to peer Collaborative consumption had become too much ejection is an example. important for several entrepreneurs, financial experts, and Collaborative Consumption totally depends upon the retailers. Thus, it became a subject of many researches and customer self-seeking while at the same time it offers studies. It was observed by Roo Rogers and Rachel Botsman several community, financial and surrounding based benefits [1] that people provide to each other a sleeping space using as well. These advantages match up with the causes of the platform and they concluded that this cannot be solely collaborative consumption defined previously [1]. called collaborative consumption. For example, a web Socially collaborative consumption increases individual’s platform named Couchsurfing is a community where people interaction with each other as a result of people meeting are offering hospitality by sharing a home with travelers. each other. Individuals are connected with neighbors or Collaborative consumption as a concept was defined as relatives so that way they get low-cost shares and rides. The follows [1]: social cause of collaborative consumption is marked as the ―Traditional sharing, bartering, lending, trading, renting, renewal of community. People save their money as they gifting, and swapping redefined through technology and need to get fewer products whereas still having access to the peer communities- that is remodeling business, services of this product. As an instance, people do not need consumerism, and also the means we tend to live‖. to get an automobile to own the quality of an automobile Collaborative consumption has three basic directions and people not ought to get a drill machine to induce a hole named as cooperative lifestyles, reshuffling of products, in any wall. products and products usage system (PUS). There are several environmental benefits of collaborative Products usage system tends makes people to change their consumption where individual creates a lot of use of mindset from owning products to actually using them. So, resources and products which already existed. In people get an advantage of products usage although they are collaborative consumption employment ration per product is not their own. In product usage system products that are high so fewer products are required to be made [2]. Besides owned by an individual or any organization are shared. Ride collaborative consumption will enhance the productivity of sharing is a good example of products usage system where services such as adaptability. For example, in vehicle people make a contribution of those people in seats of their sharing platforms customers are allowed to use the empty seats of vehicles so in this way overall fewer automobiles have used this results in better environment conditions. Manuscript received September 5, 2018; revised November 7, 2018. Benson Nwaorgu is with Digitalization Research group, School of The fourth runner of collaborative consumption is Peer to Economics and Business, Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Peer technology. In modern era ancient approaches to Lithuania (e-mail: [email protected]). doi: 10.18178/ijimt.2018.9.6.819 240 International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, Vol. 9, No. 6, December 2018 trading are reappearing in such ways and manners which include consumption. This definition of collaborative were never possible before. In short, collaborative consumption is boundless and it is not adequately consumption provides an alternate resolution to the universe emphasized on the accession and dispensation of the financial, communal and environmental disaster. resource. Moreover, it is totally based on the concept of Collaborative consumption also has four basic principles conjoint consumption. besides the four runners and works on the base of these For instance, in a group of people drinking beer together, principles. The first is the trust among the newcomers. To every individual spends money on their own beer. In this develop online trust among the newcomers is one of the way, their consumption is correlated at a particular time and main challenges of the collaborative consumption. The place. However, this way of consumption is one of the second is the belief among the individuals. Some scholars [3] marketplace exchanges. If a pitcher of beer is bought by one signified that straightforward orders will permit for a of them for consumption then it would be considered as competently self-coordinated commons, which people can sharing as it includes ―the act and process of distributing collaborate to act within the good, even in capitalist what is ours to others for their use‖ [7]. societies. The third is the futile potential. Futile products If there are two friends and they want to drink beer but become appropriate for the collaborative consumption and they do not want to get a full pitcher of beer also they do not are used with vital prices. An automobile that is used for want to pay the inflated price by buying full glass. They only one hour in a month costs too much [1] The fourth and might persuade a couple at the second table to split a pitcher final principle is the specific number of users that is attained. of beer with them. In this way, the cost and beer will be Sharing cars, open libraries, renting rooms or digital divided between both tables. This type of deal includes such learning communities – many forms of collaborative kind of collaborative consumption in which both the consumption are becoming more and more popular and acquisition and distribution of the product is conjointly represent excellent alternatives to traditional markets. organized. In this paper, we seek to access the ways what platforms If a football game is watched by a group of people then it of collaborative consumption are available and explain what would compose collaborative consumption [6]. However, in impact new technologies have on this new form of this situation, no event distribution is acquired by fans (the consumption. game will be played at it's fixing time and venue regardless of whether the fans have bought tickets or not). They also didn’t cooperate in its acquisition to get any discount by II. MATERIALS AND METHODS buying their tickets together. This too would not be an This paper was approached by a comparative method and example of collaborative consumption as the term that we the conclusions were made by analytical and syntactical used. analysis of different web platforms, their data, services and We also observed the misspecified use of the concept of impact. The main purpose was to discuss impact of new ―collaborative consumption‖ by argues [1] which defined it technologies on collaborative consumption. In the purpose as ―traditional sharing, bartering, lending, trading, renting, of research relevant studies, articles, books and web blogs gifting, and swapping‖. This definition is very broad and has were used. The paper also consists of author’s personal mixes between concepts like market exchange and sharing. observance regarding the collaborative consumption. The term ―collaborative consumption‖ is more clearly explained when
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Friedrich Chasin, Moritz Von Hoffen, Benedikt Hoffmeister, and Jörg Becker September 2018
    Reasons for Failures of Sharing Economy Businesses FRIEDRICH CHASIN, MORITZ VON HOFFEN, BENEDIKT HOFFMEISTER, AND JÖRG BECKER SEPTEMBER 2018 REASONS FOR FAILURES OF SHARING ECONOMY BUSINESSES CHASIN, VON HOFFEN, HOFFMEISTER, & BECKER – SEPTEMBER 2018 Agenda • Sharing Businesses Ceasing to Operate • Different Types of Sharing • Research into Failed Sharing Businesses • Sharing Business Landscape • Profile of Failed Sharing Businesses • Reasons for Platforms Ceasing to Operate • Recommendations for Success • Concluding Comments REASONS FOR FAILURES OF SHARING ECONOMY BUSINESSES CHASIN, VON HOFFEN, HOFFMEISTER, & BECKER – SEPTEMBER 2018 Sharing Businesses Ceasing to Operate • Hundreds of sharing businesses have emerged during the last ten years .Accommodations and cars/transportation are the best known .AirBnB, Uber • Many lesser known platforms have failed REASONS FOR FAILURES OF SHARING ECONOMY BUSINESSES CHASIN, VON HOFFEN, HOFFMEISTER, & BECKER – SEPTEMBER 2018 Different Types of Sharing • Peer to Peer (P2P) sharing .AirBnB, Uber • Sharing can be done with or without compensation to the provider • With either immaterial or physical resources • With resources owned by either private individuals or businesses REASONS FOR FAILURES OF SHARING ECONOMY BUSINESSES CHASIN, VON HOFFEN, HOFFMEISTER, & BECKER – SEPTEMBER 2018 Figure 1: Transactions in the Sharing Economy Reliance on Ownership Physical Selling Transfer of Gifting Ownership Resource Redistributing P2P SCC Physical Renting Lending Resource Servicing No Transfer of Ownership Immaterial Participating Servicing Resource Volunteering Level of Free Compensated Compensated Commercialization Private Enterprise Setting Setting REASONS FOR FAILURES OF SHARING ECONOMY BUSINESSES CHASIN, VON HOFFEN, HOFFMEISTER, & BECKER – SEPTEMBER 2018 Research into Failed Sharing Businesses • No single source of failure • 17 businesses examined in depth • 521 sharing platforms tracked over 35 months Launch No.
    [Show full text]
  • Jakamistalouden Ilmiöt Helsingissä
    Jakamistalouden ilmiöt Helsingissä Sara Jäntti 4.1.2016 Tiivistelmä Tekijä Sara Jäntti Koulutusohjelma Matkailun liikkeenjohdon koulutusohjelma Raportin/Opinnäytetyön nimi Sivu- ja lii- tesivumäärä Jakamistalouden ilmiöt Helsingissä 46 + 8 Terminä jakamistalous on vielä suomalaisille melko tuntematon, mutta yritykset kuten Airbnb, Uber ja tapahtumat kuten Ravintolapäivä ovat jo paljon tunnetumpia. Jakamistalous on syn- tynyt maailman finanssikriisin aikoihin ja se on muutamassa vuodessa kasvanut räjähdys- mäisesti, mutta myös jo ehtinyt muuttua matkan varrella. Aihe on herättänyt paljon keskuste- lua puolesta ja vastaan. Jakamistalous on jo muuttanut perinteistä liiketoimintaa ja tulevaisuudessa ne yritykset, jotka pystyvät mukautumaan muutoksiin, tulevat pärjäämään parhaiten. Oleellinen kysymys päät- tävien tahojen pohdittavaksi on kuinka integroida jakamistalous vallitsevaan lainsäädäntöön, sekä miten mukautua uudenlaisten työmuotojen tuomaan ongelmaan esimerkiksi työn vero- tuksen osalta. Tämä opinnäytetyö on tehty Haaga-Helian toimeksiannosta ja on osa Sharing City – Helsin- gistä jakamistalouden edelläkävijä -hanketta. Selvityksen teoreettinen viitekehys avaa käsit- teitä kuten jakamistalous, Sharing City, resurssiviisaus sekä kiertotalous. Päätutkimuskysy- mys on selvittää millaisia jakamistalouden palveluita, yrityksiä ja ilmiöitä Helsingissä on. Ala- tutkimuskysymyksissä keskitytään jakamistalouden palveluihin alakategorioissa: liikenne, asuminen ja tilat, ruoka sekä tavarat ja palvelut. Oheinen selvitys on kvalitatiivinen tutkimus,
    [Show full text]
  • Road4fame Catalogue of Business Models
    Deliverable 4.1 Catalogue of Future Business Services and Associated Business Opportunities DISSEMINATION LEVEL PU Public X PP Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission Services) RE Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services) CO Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services) COVER AND CONTROL PAGE OF DOCUMENT Project Acronym: Road4FAME Project Full Name: Development of a Strategic Research and Innovation Roadmap for Future Architectures and Services for Manufacturing in Europe and Derivation of Business Opportunities Grant Agreement No.: 609167 Programme ICT – Challenge 7: ICT for the Enterprise and Manufacturing Instrument: Coordination Action Start date of project: 01.06.2013 Duration: 29 months Deliverable No.: D 4.1 Document name: Catalogue of Future Business Services and Associated Business Opportunities Work Package 4 Associated Task 4.1; 4.2 Nature 1 R Dissemination Level 2 PU Version: Issued 1.0 Actual Submission Date: 2015-05-30 Contractual Submission Date 2015-05-30 Editor: Haydn Thompson Institution: THHINK E-mail: [email protected] The Road4FAME project is co-funded by the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme under grant agreement n o 609167. The author is solely responsible for its content, it does not represent the opinion of the European Community and the Community is not responsible for any use that might be made of data appearing therein. 1 R=Report, P=Prototype, D=Demonstrator, O=Other 2 PU =Public,
    [Show full text]
  • 1. the Changing Notions of Materialism and Status in an Increasingly Dematerialized World Russell Belk
    1. The changing notions of materialism and status in an increasingly dematerialized world Russell Belk THE DIGITAL WORLD One of the first things we do each morning – for some of us even before we get out of bed – is to check how our digital self is doing. What messages have we received on WhatsApp or WeChat? Who has tagged us in photos on Facebook? [What are those whose tweets we are] following saying? What is [the weather today?] How is our bank account doing? Who has shown an interest in our dating profile? How does our Fitbit or Apple Watch say we have slept? Rather than directly taking stock of our body to see how we are doing, we increasingly turn to our digital devices to see how we are. More accurately, we seek to find out how our digital doppelgänger is doing (Bode and Kristensen 2016). This estranged other or second self is our digital self, a self that is increasingly displacing our corporeal flesh and blood self in terms of its importance in our lives. Our avatars, selfies, and social media profiles are also who we are to those we encounter online. We would rather communicate through these doppelgängers than face-to-face, sometimes even when we are in the same room with someone. And we increasingly talk to Artificial Intelligence (AI) digital assistants in our homes, vehi- cles, and phones. We get our news, music, films, and messages through our digital devices. We feel naked without these extensions of self (Belk 2013). Our world is becoming more and more digital.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of the Sharing City
    IIIEE Thesis 2014:22 The Rise of the Sharing City Examining Origins and Futures of Urban Sharing Patrycja Maria Długosz Supervisors Professor Oksana Mont International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics (IIIEE), Lund University & Ms Susanne Salz Project Manager, Collaborating Centre on Sustainable Consumption and Production (CSCP) Thesis for the fulfilment of the Master of Science in Environmental Management and Policy Lund, Sweden, September 2014 © You may use the contents of the IIIEE publications for informational purposes only. You may not copy, lend, hire, transmit or redistribute these materials for commercial purposes or for compensation of any kind without written permission from IIIEE. When using IIIEE material you must include the following copyright notice: ‘Copyright © Patrycja M. Długosz, IIIEE, Lund University. All rights reserved’ in any copy that you make in a clearly visible position. You may not modify the materials without the permission of the author. Published in 2014 by IIIEE, Lund University, P.O. Box 196, S-221 00 LUND, Sweden, Tel: +46 – 46 222 02 00, Fax: +46 – 46 222 02 10, e-mail: [email protected]. ISSN 1401-9191 The Rise of the Sharing City Acknowledgements I would like to thank my supervisors Professor Oksana Mont and Ms Susanne Salz for their dedication, thoughtful guidance, and constructive feedback throughout this thesis process. I also extend my gratitude towards all my interviewees and discussants for their generosity in sharing their time, expertise and thoughts. A big thank you to all the faculty and staff at the IIIEE for their enthusiasm, and passion. A special thank you to Birgitta, who is the greatest student coordinator there is.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward a Sustainable Marketplace: Expanding Options and Benefits for Consumers
    W&M ScholarWorks Mason School of Business Articles Mason School of Business 2011 Toward a Sustainable Marketplace: Expanding Options and Benefits for Consumers Michael G. Luchs College of William and Mary, [email protected] Rebecca W. Naylor Ohio State University - Main Campus Randall L. Rose University of South Carolina Jesse R. Catlin University of California, Irvine Roland Gau Tulane University See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/businesspubs Part of the Other Business Commons Recommended Citation Luchs, Michael G., Rebecca Walker Naylor and Randall L. Rose (2011), “Toward a Sustainable Marketplace: Expanding Options and Benefits for Consumers,” Journal of Research for Consumers, 19: 1-12. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Mason School of Business at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mason School of Business Articles by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Michael G. Luchs, Rebecca W. Naylor, Randall L. Rose, Jesse R. Catlin, Roland Gau, Sommer Kapitan, Jenny Mish, Lucie Ozanne, Marcus Phipps, and Bonnie Simpson This article is available at W&M ScholarWorks: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/businesspubs/1 Issue: 19, 2011 ________________________________________________ Toward a Sustainable Marketplace: Expanding Options and Benefits for Consumers AUTHOR(S)*: Michael Luchs1, Rebecca Walker Naylor2, Randall L. Rose3, Jesse R. Catlin4, Roland Gau5, Sommer Kapitan6, Jenny Mish7, Lucie Ozanne8, Marcus Phipps9, Bonnie Simpson10, Saroja Subrahmanyan11, and Todd Weaver12 * Order of authorship is alphabetical amongst the first three co-authors, who served as co-chairs of the Sustainable Consumption Track of the 3rd Transformative Consumer Research conference held at Baylor University’s Hankamer School of Business in the summer of 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Success Factors for Peer-To-Peer Platforms in the Sharing Economy
    Critical Success Factors for Peer-to-Peer platforms in the Sharing Economy Thesis MSc. Business Administration Entrepreneurship & Innovation Author Tim de Jong Student number 10599185 Date 04-11-2015 Version Final Supervisor dr. W. van der Aa 1 With the limited resources we have on the earth, the next step for conservation is instead of just buying stuff, sharing stuff Zilok CEO On the whole, you find wealth much more in use than in ownership Aristotle 2 Statement of originality This document is written by Student Tim de Jong who declares to take full responsibility for the contents of this document. I declare that the text and the work presented in this document is original and that no sources other than those mentioned in the text and its references have been used in creating it. The Faculty of Economics and Business is responsible solely for the supervision of completion of the work, not for the contents. 3 Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................ 6 Abstract .................................................................................................................................................. 7 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Environmental degradation ........................................................................................................... 8 1.2 Sharing Economy - The Resource
    [Show full text]
  • Summer Dresses Britain Sees Soviet Attempt to Create Siege Inside
    MARY CHENEY UBRARY FETOAT, JUNE tf, 194B pakOC T o n rrE E !t Avsngs M y Nst Pi I 4 iBattfl|ggter Cuntteg fm tU i W. R BrtatM of tbs Fasttag- house Corporation, win coinsome to Sales Improve o About Town Msnchestsr Monday to spook to " '" 5 3 9 ths Monchsatsr Kiwonlt Cnih. Mis Charming llr . and Idra. Hamilton Grant of oubjsct win hsvs to do with houM At Berry Marl Iff canter stm t an learlnf to­ elsctrie wiring. His talk win bs Cky ef rmege Oimm morrow for a ten-day vacaUon at illustrated with pictuns. Ha eomoo Cape Cod. here umn Invltotlon of Everett Largent.^ Far Thi* Sea- OB fsso IS) (TWILYB PAGES) Keith. The mttendonoe prim oiU be ^ 0 VOL. LZVm NO. IM MANCHKSnR, CONN., SATURDAY, JUNE 16, 1946 Konegunda M. Baetla hae eold nirnished by Roy Blocomb. •on Reported^ 607 Summer bar aeven-room elngle house at M Darning straat to Robert and Irene The June meeting of tbs Board of Craten A n Offered JacquiUi. The transfer was made Trustees of the Monchsstcr Ms- Family Man W i FRESHNESS through Arthur Knolls, realtor. morisl hospital will be held at the Tsstsrday ths sales st ths Msn­ hospital next Monday sventng at chestsr Auction Market wen the Republican Campaign^ ^ . x » . CONTROL 1 Britain Sees Soviet Edward T. Lucas, Fireman, UBN. 7:30. The meeting was postponed larg est so tsr this sesaon, accord­ !>•*- Dresses T m mr son of Mr. and M rs C. Lucas of from an esilier date beesuss of ths ing to the rep<<rt of Raymond Reid lit North School street, Manches­ absence from town of Superinten­ of R M.
    [Show full text]
  • Berlin Auf Dem Weg Zu Einer Sharing City Potenzialanalyse Der Share Und Collaborative Economy in Berlin
    Von der geteilten zur teilenden Stadt – Berlin auf dem Weg zu einer Sharing City Potenzialanalyse der Share und Collaborative Economy in Berlin POTENZIALANALYSE DER SHARE & COLLABORATIVE ECONOMY IN BERLIN Einleitung ................................................................................................................... 4 Abschnitt I: Kontextualisierung der Share Economy .................................................... 5 Begriffsklärung .............................................................................................................................. 5 1) Kollaborativer Konsum ............................................................................................................... 7 2) Kollaborative Produktion ............................................................................................................ 8 3) Kollaborative Finanzierung ....................................................................................................... 89 4) Kollaboratives Wissen .............................................................................................................. 89 Weltweite Entwicklung der Share & Collaborative Economy ........................................................... 9 Blick in die globale Zukunft ....................................................................................................... 1011 Indikatoren der Share & Collaborative Economy ........................................................................ 1112 Blick in die urbane Zukunft .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Besser (Und) Weniger
    Broschüre_Ressourcenschutz_verbraucher 7_Nano in Lebensmitteln RZ 09.11.16 11:46 Seite 1 Besser (und) weniger Ansätze für ressourcenschonendes und abfallarmes Handeln Broschüre_Ressourcenschutz_verbraucher 7_Nano in Lebensmitteln RZ 09.11.16 11:46 Seite 2 Inhalt 1. Einleitung 3 2. Ressourcenschutz 4 3. Entscheidungen nicht nur des Verbrauchers 5 4. Recycling, Möglichkeiten und Grenzen 7 5. Verpackungsreduzierung (Verzicht, Mehrfachnutzung) 9 6. Die Ressource Wasser 10 7. Lebensmittel 13 8. Wiederverwendung 15 9. Reparaturkultur und offene Werkstätten 17 10. Tauschen, Leihen, Schenken 20 11. Transition Towns 22 12. Solidargemeinschaften 23 13. Ökodörfer und alternative Lebensgemeinschaften 24 14. Wertewandel: Gutes leben heißt nicht Wirtschaftswachstum 25 15. Schlussbemerkung 26 16. Quellen und Informationsmaterial für Verbraucher 27 2 Broschüre_Ressourcenschutz_verbraucher 7_Nano in Lebensmitteln RZ 09.11.16 11:46 Seite 3 1. Einleitung Die Ressourcen der Erde sind begrenzt. Süßwasser, Boden, Die vorliegende Broschüre will keine Handlungsanweisung Rohstoffe und die Fähigkeit, CO2 aufzu nehmen werden heu- sein. Sie möchte Beispiele aufzeigen, was möglich ist und te weltweit in einem Maße in Anspruch genommen, das sich wichtig wäre. Zeigen, dass an vielen Orten Initiativen und langfristig nicht aufrechterhal ten lässt. Oder, anders formu- Projekte vorhanden sind, die nach Alternativen zum „immer liert: Wir leben heute auf Kosten der kommenden Genera- mehr“ suchen. Sie möchte also anregen, darüber nachzu - tionen. Nachhaltigkeit würde dagegen
    [Show full text]
  • Ufsc Centro Sócioeconômico Departamento De Economia
    1 UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA CATARINA – UFSC CENTRO SÓCIOECONÔMICO DEPARTAMENTO DE ECONOMIA E RELAÇÕES INTERNACIONAIS CURSO DE GRADUAÇÃO EM CIÊNCIAS ECONÔMICAS MONAH IDALINA MOREIRA DA SILVA A ECONOMIA COLABORATIVO/COMPARTILHADA COMO INSTRUMENTO DE DESENVOLVIMENTO ECONÔMICO FLORIANÓPOLIS- SC 2019 2 UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA CATARINA CENTRO SÓCIOECONÔMICO DEPARTAMENTO DE ECONOMIA E RELAÇÕES INTERNACIONAIS CURSO DE GRADUAÇÃO EM CIÊNCIAS ECONÔMICAS A ECONOMIA COLABORATIVA/COMPARTILHADA COMO INSTRUMENTO DE DESENVOLVIMENTO ECONÔMICO Trabalho de conclusão de curso apresentado à Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, como requisito para o recebimento do grau de Bacharel em Ciências Econômicas. Orientador: Prof. Dr. Armando de Melo FLORIANÓPOLIS – SC 2019 3 UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA CATARINA CENTRO SÓCIOECONÔMICO DEPARTAMENTO DE ECONOMIA E RELAÇÕES INTERNACIONAIS CURSO DE GRADUAÇÃO EM CIÊNCIAS ECONÔMICAS A Banca Examinadora resolveu atribuir a nota 9,0 ao aluno Monah Idalina Moreira da Silva na disciplina CNM 7107 – Monografia, pela apresentação deste trabalho. Banca Examinadora: ------------------------------------------------- Prof. Armando de Mello Lisboa -------------------------------------------------- Prof. Carmen Gelinski -------------------------------------------------- Prof. Jonatan Lautenschlage 4 Dedico esse trabalho a minha avó Iracema (in memorian), que me ensinou valores importantes para toda a vida e, que sempre será um grande exemplo de dignidade e caráter. 5 AGRADECIMENTOS Agradeço: A minha mãe, por não ter medido esforços para me proporcionar tantas oportunidades, e apesar das dificuldades, sempre me apoiando ao longo de todos estes anos de estudo. Obrigada por demonstrar tanto amor, preocupação e dedicação incondicional, pelas palavras de carinho e de acalento, pela calma, ouvindo meus anseio e por estar sempre disposta a me ajudar, sempre torcendo pela minha felicidade acima de tudo. Sua simplicidade, fé e otimismo me fazem querer ser sempre uma pessoa melhor.
    [Show full text]
  • Carmel Pine Cone, June 26, 2015
    VolumeThe 101 No. 26 Carmel On the Internet: www.carmelpinecone.com Pine Cone June 26 - July 2, 2015 TRUSTED BY LOCALS AND LOVED BY VISITORS SINCE 1915 Potter calls for investigation of Grand jury blames ‘vandalism’ at landmark P.B. house city’s problems By KELLY NIX untouched.” “What I saw last week was to the point where there should A MONTEREY County supervisor Tuesday called for be some criminal prosecution on this,” Potter said. “And I on Pine Cone, the district attorney’s office to open an investigation of van- hope the district attorney’s office gets involved.” dalism that was reported in February to an historic Pebble Beach house that’s at the center of a dispute between its See DAMAGED page 16A residents, mayor wealthy Silicon Valley owner and a group of preservationists. In comments made at Tuesday’s board of supervisors meeting, 5th District Supervisor Dave Potter said whoever and council damaged the Richard Neutra-designed house at 1170 Signal Hill owned by Massy Mehdipour should be “criminally pros- By MARY SCHLEY ecuted.” Mehdipour is trying to get approval to raze the 1958 mid- A REPORT that was widely expected to condemn the century modern house and replace it with a new one, but actions of former city administrator Jason Stilwell and sec- preservationists and neighbors are trying to stop her. ond-in-command Susan Paul instead lambasted longtime Though Mehdipour reported to sheriff’s deputies that van- employees, The Carmel Pine Cone, the mayor and the city dals had badly damaged the house, Potter rejected the claim.
    [Show full text]