DOCSLIB.ORG

6Th Annual Earth System Grid Federation Face-To-Face Conference December 5–9, 2016 Washington, D.C

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
6Th Annual Earth System Grid Federation Face-To-Face Conference December 5–9, 2016 Washington, D.C DOE/SC-0188 6th Annual Earth System Grid Federation Face-to-Face Conference December 5–9, 2016 Washington, D.C. Convened by U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) Infrastructure for the European Network for Earth System Modelling (IS-ENES) National Computational Infrastructure (NCI) Australia Workshop and Report Organizers Dean N. Williams (Chair; DOE Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) Michael Lautenschlager (Co-Chair; German Climate Computing Centre) Sébastien Denvil (Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace) Luca Cinquini (NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory) Robert Ferraro (NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory) Daniel Duffy (NASA Goddard Space Flight Center) Ben Evans (NCI) Claire Trenham (NCI) ESGF Steering Committee Justin (Jay) Hnilo (DOE, U.S.) Sylvie Joussaume (IS-ENES2, Europe) Tsengdar Lee (NASA, U.S.) Ben Evans (NCI, Australia) Dean N. Williams (DOE, U.S.; Ex-officio member) This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, nor any of their employees makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is operated by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. Suggested citation for this report: U.S. DOE. 2017. 6th Annual Earth System Grid Federation Face-to-Face Conference Report. DOE/SC-0188. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science. DOE/SC-0188 6th Annual Earth System Grid Federation Face-to-Face Conference Report December 5–9, 2016 Washington, D.C. Publication Date: February 2017 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration U.S. National Science Foundation Infrastructure for the European Network for Earth System Modelling National Computational Infrastructure Australia December 2016 6th Annual ESGF Face-to-Face Conference i Earth System Grid Federation ii 6th Annual ESGF Face-to-Face Conference December 2016 Contents Preface by ESGF Executive Committee Chair ....................................................................................................................v Executive Summary ..............................................................................................................................................................ix 1. Stakeholders’ Summary by Steering Committee .........................................................................................................1 2. User Survey Results (2016) ...............................................................................................................................................3 3. Usage Demographics (2016) ......................................................................................................................................... 11 3.1 Statistics Overview.................................................................................................................................................................................................11 3.2 Registered Users and Downloads by Project ...............................................................................................................................................12 3.3 Downloads by Continent ....................................................................................................................................................................................12 3.4 Registered Users by Continent ..........................................................................................................................................................................12 3.5 Registered Users by Site .......................................................................................................................................................................................12 4. Conference Findings ....................................................................................................................................................... 17 4.1 CMIP6 Data Archive ...............................................................................................................................................................................................17 4.2 CMIP6 Tier 1 Node ..................................................................................................................................................................................................17 4.3 CMIP6 Tier 2 Node ..................................................................................................................................................................................................17 4.4 Software Security ...................................................................................................................................................................................................17 4.5 Server-Side Computing ........................................................................................................................................................................................18 4.6 Provenance Capture ..............................................................................................................................................................................................19 4.7 Search and Metadata ............................................................................................................................................................................................19 4.8 Metrics ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................20 4.9 Survey .........................................................................................................................................................................................................................20 4.10 Modularity ..............................................................................................................................................................................................................20 4.11 Installation ..............................................................................................................................................................................................................21 4.12 Container Software .............................................................................................................................................................................................21 4.13 Data Replication and Test Federation ...........................................................................................................................................................21 4.14 Network ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................22 4.15 Persistent Identifiers for Data Identification ..............................................................................................................................................23 4.16 Digital Object Identifiers ...................................................................................................................................................................................24 4.17 Training and Documentation ..........................................................................................................................................................................24 5. Scientific Challenges and Motivating Use Cases ....................................................................................................... 25 5.1 Open Science Cloud Challenge .........................................................................................................................................................................25 5.2 Data Challenge ........................................................................................................................................................................................................25 5.3 Data Integration Challenge ................................................................................................................................................................................25 5.4 Computational Environment
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Exploration of the Moon
    Exploration of the Moon The physical exploration of the Moon began when Luna 2, a space probe launched by the Soviet Union, made an impact on the surface of the Moon on September 14, 1959. Prior to that the only available means of exploration had been observation from Earth. The invention of the optical telescope brought about the first leap in the quality of lunar observations. Galileo Galilei is generally credited as the first person to use a telescope for astronomical purposes; having made his own telescope in 1609, the mountains and craters on the lunar surface were among his first observations using it. NASA's Apollo program was the first, and to date only, mission to successfully land humans on the Moon, which it did six times. The first landing took place in 1969, when astronauts placed scientific instruments and returnedlunar samples to Earth. Apollo 12 Lunar Module Intrepid prepares to descend towards the surface of the Moon. NASA photo. Contents Early history Space race Recent exploration Plans Past and future lunar missions See also References External links Early history The ancient Greek philosopher Anaxagoras (d. 428 BC) reasoned that the Sun and Moon were both giant spherical rocks, and that the latter reflected the light of the former. His non-religious view of the heavens was one cause for his imprisonment and eventual exile.[1] In his little book On the Face in the Moon's Orb, Plutarch suggested that the Moon had deep recesses in which the light of the Sun did not reach and that the spots are nothing but the shadows of rivers or deep chasms.
    [Show full text]
  • Spacex CRS-4 National Aeronautics and Fourth Commercial Resupply Services Flight Space Administration
    SpaceX CRS-4 National Aeronautics and Fourth Commercial Resupply Services Flight Space Administration to the International Space Station September 2014 OVERVIEW The Dragon spacecraft will be filled with more than 5,000 pounds of supplies and payloads, including critical materials to support 255 science and research investigations that will occur during Expeditions 41 and 42. Dragon will carry three powered cargo payloads in its pressurized section and two in its unpressurized trunk. Science payloads will enable model organism research using rodents, fruit flies and plants. A special science payload is the ISS-Rapid Scatterometer to monitor ocean surface wind speed and direction. Several new technology demonstrations aboard will enable bone density studies, test how a small satellite moves and positions itself in space using new thruster technology, and use the first 3-D printer in space for additive manufacturing. The mission also delivers IMAX cameras for filming during four increments and replacement batteries for the spacesuits. After four weeks at the space station, the spacecraft will return with about 3,800 pounds of cargo, including crew supplies, hardware and computer resources, science experiments, space station hardware, and four powered payloads. DRAGON CARGO LAUNCH ITEMS RETURN ITEMS TOTAL CARGO: 4885 lbs / 2216 kg 3276 lbs / 1486 kg · Crew Supplies 1380 lbs / 626 kg 132 lbs / 60 kg Crew care packages Crew provisions Food · Vehicle Hardware 403 lbs / 183 kg 937 lbs / 425 kg Crew Health Care System hardware Environment Control & Life Support equipment Electrical Power System hardware Extravehicular Robotics equipment Flight Crew Equipment Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency equipment · Science Investigations 1644 lbs / 746 kg 2075 lbs / 941 kg U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • NUCLEAR SAFETY LAUNCH APPROVAL: MULTI-MISSION LESSONS LEARNED Yale Chang the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
    ANS NETS 2018 – Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space Las Vegas, NV, February 26 – March 1, 2018, on CD-ROM, American Nuclear Society, LaGrange Park, IL (2018) NUCLEAR SAFETY LAUNCH APPROVAL: MULTI-MISSION LESSONS LEARNED Yale Chang The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Rd, Laurel, MD 20723 240-228-5724; [email protected] Launching a NASA radioisotope power system (RPS) trajectory to Saturn used a Venus-Venus-Earth-Jupiter mission requires compliance with two Federal mandates: Gravity Assist (VVEJGA) maneuver, where the Earth the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) Gravity Assist (EGA) flyby was the primary nuclear safety and launch approval (LA), as directed by Presidential focus of NASA, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), the Directive/National Security Council Memorandum 25. Cassini Interagency Nuclear Safety Review Panel Nuclear safety launch approval lessons learned from (INSRP), and the public alike. A solid propellant fire test multiple NASA RPS missions, one Russian RPS mission, campaign addressed the MPF finding and led in part to two non-RPS launch accidents, and several solid the retrofit solid propellant breakup systems (BUSs) propellant fire test campaigns since 1996 are shown to designed and carried by MER-A and MER-B spacecraft have contributed to an ever-growing body of knowledge. and the deployment of plutonium detectors in the launch The launch accidents can be viewed as “unplanned area for PNH. The PNH mission decreased the calendar experiments” that provided real-world data. Lessons length of the NEPA/LA processes to less than 4 years by learned from the nuclear safety launch approval effort of incorporating lessons learned from previous missions and each mission or launch accident, and how they were tests in its spacecraft and mission designs and their applied to improve the NEPA/LA processes and nuclear NEPA/LA processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Sentinel-1A Launch
    SENTINEL-1A LAUNCH Arianespace’s seventh Soyuz launch from the Guiana Space Center will orbit Sentinel-1A, the first satellite in Europe’s Earth observation program, Copernicus. The European Space Agency (ESA) chose Thales Alenia Space to design, develop and build the satellite, as well as perform related tests. Copernicus is the new name for the European program previously known as GMES (Global Monitoring for Environment and Security), and is the European Commission’s second major space program, following Galileo. Copernicus is designed to give Europe continuous, independent and reliable access to Earth observation data. With the Soyuz, Ariane 5 and Vega launchers at the Guiana Space Center (CSG), Arianespace is the only launch services provider in the world capable of launching all types of payloads into all orbits, from the smallest to the largest geostationary satellites, from satellite clusters for constellations to cargo missions for the International Space Station (ISS). Arianespace sets the launch services standard for all operators, whether commercial or governmental, and guarantees access to space for scientific missions. Sentinel-1A is the 50th satellite with an Earth observation payload to be launched by Arianespace. Arianespace has seven more Earth observation missions in its order book, including four commercial missions (signed in 2013 and 2014). The Copernicus program is designed to give Europe complete independence in the acquisition and management of environmental data concerning our planet. ESA’s Sentinel programs comprise five satellite families: Sentinel-1, to provide continuity for radar data from ERS and Envisat. Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-3, dedicated to the observation of the Earth and its oceans.
    [Show full text]
  • Securing Japan an Assessment of Japan´S Strategy for Space
    Full Report Securing Japan An assessment of Japan´s strategy for space Report: Title: “ESPI Report 74 - Securing Japan - Full Report” Published: July 2020 ISSN: 2218-0931 (print) • 2076-6688 (online) Editor and publisher: European Space Policy Institute (ESPI) Schwarzenbergplatz 6 • 1030 Vienna • Austria Phone: +43 1 718 11 18 -0 E-Mail: [email protected] Website: www.espi.or.at Rights reserved - No part of this report may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or for any purpose without permission from ESPI. Citations and extracts to be published by other means are subject to mentioning “ESPI Report 74 - Securing Japan - Full Report, July 2020. All rights reserved” and sample transmission to ESPI before publishing. ESPI is not responsible for any losses, injury or damage caused to any person or property (including under contract, by negligence, product liability or otherwise) whether they may be direct or indirect, special, incidental or consequential, resulting from the information contained in this publication. Design: copylot.at Cover page picture credit: European Space Agency (ESA) TABLE OF CONTENT 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background and rationales ............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Objectives of the Study ................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Methodology
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment and Combination of SMAP and Sentinel-1A/B-Derived Soil Moisture Estimates with Land Surface Model Outputs in the Mid-Atlantic Coastal Plain, USA
    This article has been accepted for inclusion in a future issue of this journal. Content is final as presented, with the exception of pagination. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING 1 Assessment and Combination of SMAP and Sentinel-1A/B-Derived Soil Moisture Estimates With Land Surface Model Outputs in the Mid-Atlantic Coastal Plain, USA Hyunglok Kim , Sangchul Lee, Michael H. Cosh , Senior Member, IEEE, Venkataraman Lakshmi , Yonghwan Kwon, and Gregory W. McCarty Abstract— Prediction of large-scale water-related natural further evaluation of the three SM products, and the maximize-R disasters such as droughts, floods, wildfires, landslides, and method was applied to combine SMAP and NoahMP36 SM data. dust outbreaks can benefit from the high spatial resolution CDF-matched 9-, 3-, and 1-km SMAP SM data showed reliable soil moisture (SM) data of satellite and modeled products performance: R and ubRMSD values of the CDF-matched SMAP because antecedent SM conditions in the topsoil layer govern products were 0.658, 0.626, and 0.570 and 0.049, 0.053, and the partitioning of precipitation into infiltration and runoff. 0.055 m3/m3, respectively. When SMAP and NoahMP36 were SM data retrieved from Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) combined, the R-values for the 9-, 3-, and 1-km SMAP SM data have proved to be an effective method of monitoring SM content were greatly improved: R-values were 0.825, 0.804, and 0.795, at different spatial resolutions: 1) radiometer-based product and ubRMSDs were 0.034, 0.036, and 0.037 m3/m3, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia Commercial Space Flight Authority Financial Statements Report for the Year Ended June 30, 2014
    Financial Statements Year Ended June 30, 2014 Virginia Commercial Space Flight Authority Virginia Commercial Space Flight Authority Contents Page Independent Auditors' Report 1 - 2 Management's Discussion and Analysis 3 - 8 Financial Statements Statement of Net Position 9 Statement of Revenue, Expenses and Changes in Net Position 10 Statement of Cash Flows 11 Notes to Financial Statements 12 - 16 Compliance Section Independent Auditors' Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on 17 - 18 Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards Other Information Authority Officials 19 Independent Auditors’ Report Board of Directors Virginia Commercial Space Flight Authority Report on the Financial Statements We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the Virginia Commercial Space Flight Authority as of and for the year ended June 30, 2014, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the Virginia Commercial Space Flight Authority’s basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents. Management’s Responsibility for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from
    [Show full text]
  • Failures in Spacecraft Systems: an Analysis from The
    FAILURES IN SPACECRAFT SYSTEMS: AN ANALYSIS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF DECISION MAKING A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Purdue University by Vikranth R. Kattakuri In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering August 2019 Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana ii THE PURDUE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL STATEMENT OF THESIS APPROVAL Dr. Jitesh H. Panchal, Chair School of Mechanical Engineering Dr. Ilias Bilionis School of Mechanical Engineering Dr. William Crossley School of Aeronautics and Astronautics Approved by: Dr. Jay P. Gore Associate Head of Graduate Studies iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am extremely grateful to my advisor Prof. Jitesh Panchal for his patient guidance throughout the two years of my studies. I am indebted to him for considering me to be a part of his research group and for providing this opportunity to work in the fields of systems engineering and mechanical design for a period of 2 years. Being a research and teaching assistant under him had been a rewarding experience. Without his valuable insights, this work would not only have been possible, but also inconceivable. I would like to thank my co-advisor Prof. Ilias Bilionis for his valuable inputs, timely guidance and extremely engaging research meetings. I thank my committee member, Prof. William Crossley for his interest in my work. I had a great opportunity to attend all three courses taught by my committee members and they are the best among all the courses I had at Purdue. I would like to thank my mentors Dr. Jagannath Raju of Systemantics India Pri- vate Limited and Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Dragon Spacecraft, and Commentary on the Launch and Flight Sequences
    SpaceX CRS-3 Mission Press Kit CONTENTS 3 Mission Overview 7 Mission Timeline 9 Graphics – Rendezvous, Grapple and Berthing, Departure and Re-Entry 11 International Space Station Overview 13 Falcon 9 Overview 16 Dragon Overview 18 SpaceX Facilities 20 SpaceX Overview 22 SpaceX Leadership SPACEX MEDIA CONTACT Emily Shanklin Senior Director, Marketing and Communications 310-363-6733 [email protected] NASA PUBLIC AFFAIRS CONTACTS Trent Perrotto Michael Curie Josh Byerly Public Affairs Officer News Chief Public Affairs Officer Human Exploration and Operations Launch Operations International Space Station NASA Headquarters NASA Kennedy Space Center NASA Johnson Space Center 202-358-1100 321-867-2468 281-483-5111 Rachel Kraft George Diller Public Affairs Officer Public Affairs Officer Human Exploration and Operations Launch Operations NASA Headquarters NASA Kennedy Space Center 202-358-1100 321-867-2468 1 HIGH RESOLUTION PHOTOS AND VIDEO SpaceX will post photos and video throughout the mission. High-resolution photographs can be downloaded from: spacex.com/media Broadcast quality video can be downloaded from: vimeo.com/spacexlaunch/ MORE RESOURCES ON THE WEB For SpaceX coverage, visit: For NASA coverage, visit: spacex.com www.nasa.gov/station twitter.com/elonmusk www.nasa.gov/nasatv twitter.com/spacex twitter.com/nasa facebook.com/spacex facebook.com/ISS plus.google.com/+SpaceX plus.google.com/+NASA youtube.com/spacex youtube.com/nasatelevision WEBCAST INFORMATION The launch will be webcast live, with commentary from SpaceX corporate headquarters in Hawthorne, CA, at spacex.com/webcast and NASA’s Kennedy Space Center at www.nasa.gov/nasatv. Web pre-launch coverage will begin at approximately 3:00 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • China Dream, Space Dream: China's Progress in Space Technologies and Implications for the United States
    China Dream, Space Dream 中国梦，航天梦China’s Progress in Space Technologies and Implications for the United States A report prepared for the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission Kevin Pollpeter Eric Anderson Jordan Wilson Fan Yang Acknowledgements: The authors would like to thank Dr. Patrick Besha and Dr. Scott Pace for reviewing a previous draft of this report. They would also like to thank Lynne Bush and Bret Silvis for their master editing skills. Of course, any errors or omissions are the fault of authors. Disclaimer: This research report was prepared at the request of the Commission to support its deliberations. Posting of the report to the Commission's website is intended to promote greater public understanding of the issues addressed by the Commission in its ongoing assessment of U.S.-China economic relations and their implications for U.S. security, as mandated by Public Law 106-398 and Public Law 108-7. However, it does not necessarily imply an endorsement by the Commission or any individual Commissioner of the views or conclusions expressed in this commissioned research report. CONTENTS Acronyms ......................................................................................................................................... i Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... iii Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Commercial Space Transportation Forecasts
    Federal Aviation Administration 2014 Commercial Space Transportation Forecasts May 2014 FAA Commercial Space Transportation (AST) and the Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee (COMSTAC) 2014 Commercial Space Transportation Forecasts $ERXWWKH)$$2IÀFHRI&RPPHUFLDO6SDFH7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ 5IF'FEFSBM"WJBUJPO"ENJOJTUSBUJPOT0GmDFPG$PNNFSDJBM4QBDF5SBOTQPSUBUJPO '"" "45 MJDFOTFTBOESFHVMBUFT64DPNNFSDJBMTQBDFMBVODIBOESFFOUSZBDUJWJUZ BTXFMMBT UIFPQFSBUJPOPGOPOGFEFSBMMBVODIBOESFFOUSZTJUFT BTBVUIPSJ[FECZ&YFDVUJWF0SEFS BOE5JUMF6OJUFE4UBUFT$PEF 4VCUJUMF7 $IBQUFS GPSNFSMZUIF$PNNFSDJBM 4QBDF-BVODI"DU '"""45TNJTTJPOJTUPFOTVSFQVCMJDIFBMUIBOETBGFUZBOEUIFTBGFUZ PGQSPQFSUZXIJMFQSPUFDUJOHUIFOBUJPOBMTFDVSJUZBOEGPSFJHOQPMJDZJOUFSFTUTPGUIF6OJUFE 4UBUFTEVSJOHDPNNFSDJBMMBVODIBOESFFOUSZPQFSBUJPOT*OBEEJUJPO '"""45JTEJSFDUFE UPFODPVSBHF GBDJMJUBUF BOEQSPNPUFDPNNFSDJBMTQBDFMBVODIFTBOESFFOUSJFT"EEJUJPOBM JOGPSNBUJPODPODFSOJOHDPNNFSDJBMTQBDFUSBOTQPSUBUJPODBOCFGPVOEPO'"""45T XFCTJUF IUUQXXXGBBHPWHPBTU $PWFS5IF0SCJUBM4DJFODFT$PSQPSBUJPOT"OUBSFTSPDLFUJTTFFOBTJUMBVODIFTGSPN1BE "PGUIF.JE"UMBOUJD3FHJPOBM4QBDFQPSUBUUIF/"4"8BMMPQT'MJHIU'BDJMJUZJO7JSHJOJB 4VOEBZ "QSJM *NBHF$SFEJU/"4"#JMM*OHBMMT NOTICE 6TFPGUSBEFOBNFTPSOBNFTPGNBOVGBDUVSFSTJOUIJTEPDVNFOUEPFTOPU DPOTUJUVUF BO PGmDJBM FOEPSTFNFOU PG TVDI QSPEVDUT PS NBOVGBDUVSFST FJUIFS FYQSFTTFE PS JNQMJFE CZ UIF 'FEFSBM "WJBUJPO "ENJOJTUSBUJPO L )HGHUDO$YLDWLRQ$GPLQLVWUDWLRQҋV2IÀFHRI&RPPHUFLDO6SDFH7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................1 COMSTAC 2014 COMMERCIAL GEOSYNCHRONOUS
    [Show full text]
  • Small Spacecraft in Small Solar System Body Applications
    Small Spacecraft in Small Solar System Body Applications Jan Thimo Grundmann Jan-Gerd Meß DLR Institute of Space Systems DLR Institute of Space Systems Robert-Hooke-Strasse 7 Robert-Hooke-Strasse 7 28359 Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany Germany +49-421-24420-1107 +49-421-24420-1206 [email protected] [email protected] Jens Biele Patric Seefeldt DLR Space Operations and Astronaut DLR Institute of Space Systems Training – MUSC Robert-Hooke-Strasse 7 51147 Cologne, 28359 Bremen, Germany Germany +49-2203-601-4563 +49-421-24420-1609 [email protected] [email protected] Bernd Dachwald Peter Spietz Faculty of Aerospace Engineering DLR Institute of Space Systems FH Aachen Univ. of Applied Sciences Robert-Hooke-Strasse 7 Hohenstaufenallee 6 28359 Bremen, 52064 Aachen, Germany Germany +49-241-6009-52343 / -52854 +49-421-24420-1104 [email protected] [email protected] Christian D. Grimm Tom Spröwitz DLR Institute of Space Systems DLR Institute of Space Systems Robert-Hooke-Strasse 7 Robert-Hooke-Strasse 7 28359 Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany Germany +49-421-24420-1266 +49-421-24420-1237 [email protected] [email protected] Caroline Lange Stephan Ulamec DLR Institute of Space Systems DLR Space Operations and Astronaut Robert-Hooke-Strasse 7 Training – MUSC 28359 Bremen, 51147 Cologne, Germany Germany +49-421-24420-1159 +49-2203-601-4567 [email protected] [email protected] Abstract— In the wake of the successful PHILAE landing on environment has led to new methods which transcend comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko and the launch of the traditional evenly-paced and sequential development.
    [Show full text]