DOCSLIB.ORG

Sentinel-1A Flight Dynamics Leop Operational Experience

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sentinel-1A Flight Dynamics Leop Operational Experience SENTINEL-1A FLIGHT DYNAMICS LEOP OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE M. A. Martín Serrano(1), M. Catania(2), J. Sánchez(3), A. Vasconcelos(4), D. Kuijper(5) and X. Marc(6) (1)(4)SCISYS Deutschland GmbH at ESA/ESOC, Robert-Bosch-Straße 5, 64293 Darmstadt Germany, telephone: +496151902273, E-mail: [email protected], telephone: +496151902235, E-mail: [email protected], (2)(5)CGI at ESA/ESOC, Robert-Bosch-Straße 5, 64293 Darmstadt Germany, telephone: +496151903215, E-mail: [email protected], +496151902376, E-mail: [email protected], (3)GMV at ESA-ESOC, Robert-Bosch-Straße 5, 64293 Darmstadt Germany, telephone: +496151902416, E-mail: [email protected], (6) ESA/ESOC, Robert-Bosch-Straße 5, 64293 Darmstadt Germany, telephone: +496151902210, E-mail: [email protected], Abstract: Sentinel-1 is a two-satellite mission with each satellite carrying a C-Band Synthetic Aperture Radar. The Sentinel-1 satellites are part of the Sentinels fleet, which has been developed for the European Earth Observation Copernicus Programme. Sentinel-1A was launched on April 03 2014 by a Soyuz from Europe’s Space port in French Guiana into a 700 km altitude, frozen eccentricity, dusk-dawn sun-synchronous orbit with a ground-track repeat cycle of 12 days. This paper presents a report of the most relevant Flight Dynamics operations that were conducted at the European Space Control Centre (ESOC) in Darmstadt, Germany during the Sentinel-1A three day LEOP. These activities included the assessment of the injection orbit achieved by the launcher using S-band radiometric measurements during the first hours of LEOP, the monitoring of the Spacecraft appendages deployment sequence, monitoring and supporting the Spacecraft mode transitions and the implementation and execution of the first collision avoidance manoeuvre for this mission during the second day of LEOP. Keywords: Copernicus, Earth Observation, LEOP operations, LEO, Sentinels. 1. Introduction Sentinel-1A was launched by a Russian Soyuz-ST launcher equipped with a Fregat-M upper stage on April 03 2014 at 21:02:26 UTC from Europe’s Space port in French Guiana. Sentinel-1A is the first in-orbit spacecraft (S/C) from the new ESA Sentinels fleet developed for the European Earth observation Copernicus Programme, previously known as GMES (Global Monitoring for Environment and Security). It is also the first of a two-satellite System (Sentinel-1B currently planned for launch in April 2016), each carrying a C-band Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) as well as a laser communication payload to transmit data to the geostationary European Data Relay System for continual data delivery. The Sentinel-1 mission provides continuity of crucial data for user services initiated with the ERS and Envisat missions. This data is already benefiting numerous services. For example, services that relate to the monitoring of Arctic sea-ice extent, routine sea-ice mapping, surveillance of the marine environment, including oil-spill monitoring and ship detection for maritime security, monitoring 1 land-surface for motion risks, mapping for forest, water and soil management and mapping to support humanitarian aid and crisis situations. Sentinel-1A is controlled around a sun-synchronous reference orbit with a ground-track repeat pattern of 175 orbital revolutions in 12 days and a Mean Solar Local Time of the Ascending Node (MSLTAN) of 18:00 h. Figure 1. Sentinel-1A stowed representation (in RDM and SHM). +X S/C axis points towards the flight direction. S/C Y axis is aligned with the Sun direction. Solar Array –Y illuminated when stowed. The S/C Attitude and Orbit Control System (AOCS) consists of the following sensors and actuators: fine sun sensors, magnetometers, gyroscopes, star trackers, GPS receivers, magnetic torquers, a reaction wheels assembly and a monopropellant (hydrazine) propulsion system. The propulsion system has 3 pairs of 1 N Orbit Control Thrusters and 4 pairs of Reaction Control Thrusters for attitude correction. Every pair is made up of a prime and a redundant component. The attitude control thrusters are fired when the S/C enters Rate Damping Mode (RDM) after separation, damping any residual rotation left by the launcher upper stage and achieving a S/C pitch rotation of -8 times the orbital period. In the subsequent AOCS mode called Safe Hold Mode (SHM) magnetotorquers and reaction wheels maintain the attitude and reduce the pitch rotation rate to twice the orbital period. The periodic behavior of the Earth’s magnetic field in a polar orbit and the polarization of the angular momentum with the loading of the reaction wheels allow the magnetotorquers to maintain this pitch rate while aligning the S/C –Y axis with the orbit normal, which in a dusk-dawn orbit coincides with the direction to the Sun (see Figure 1). When the appendages deployment commences, the effect of the gravity gradient torque dominates over the magnetic torque, resulting in the alignment of the S/C X axis (appendages axis) with the nadir direction, maintaining thus a pitch rate equal to the orbital period. Upon ground telecommand a transition into the Normal Pointing Mode (NPM) occurs, where the S/C performs a fine attitude control based on the use of reaction wheels in close loop with star trackers, gyroscopes and GPS, and magnetotorquers for wheel unloading. 2 Sentinel-1A operations are conducted at the European Space Operations Centre (ESOC) in Darmstadt, Germany. During the three-day LEOP the main activities of the Flight Dynamics (FD) team as part of the ESOC Mission Control Team were: • Determine the injection orbit achieved by Soyuz/Fregat and support the Ground Station Network in acquiring the S/C signal at every scheduled visibility. Antennas were located in Svalbard (Norway), Alaska, Kiruna (Sweden) and Troll (Antarctica). • Monitor the AOCS telemetry during the deployment of the SAR wings and the Solar arrays as well as the S/C mode transitions ranging from Rate Damping Mode to its final Normal Pointing Mode required for operating the S/C during the Commissioning and Routine Phases. • Generate the AOCS commands required to re-initialise the on-board orbit propagation throughout its different accuracy modes to allow the S/C mode transitions. • Start the preparation of a manoeuvre sequence to acquire the Mission Reference Orbit. The manoeuvre sequence selection was driven by the overall duration of the acquisition period and the fuel consumption. This paper presents the FD operational activities conducted during the three-day LEOP. 2. Separation and first acquisition Figure 2. Sentinel-1A LEOP Ground Stations Network and S/C ground-track evolution during the first 4 hours after separation. 3 The Russian Soyuz launch vehicle was released from its launch pad at the Europe’s Space Port in French Guyana on April 03 2014 at 21:02:26 UTC. Sentinel-1A separation from the Fregat-M upper stage took place 1404 seconds after lift-off, following a nominal ascending flight sequence which included separation of the Soyuz two main stages, payload fairing jettisoning, third stage boost, nose module separation and Fregat-M main burn. Separation occurred within visibility of KSAT ground station at Svalbard (see Figure 2) and three minutes before entering visibility from the SSC/USN antenna in Alaska. Approximately one minute after physical separation, the on-board automatic sequence started, switching on the S-band transponder and setting the S/C mode to RDM. The first TM frames were successfully received at Svalbard station and forwarded to ESOC at 21:27:15 UTC. At the end of the first Svalbard-Alaska combined ground pass the S/C rates had been damped as expected (see Figure 3) and auto-convergence to the next AOCS mode SHM had occurred. The received TM indicated a fully nominal S/C behavior and all commanding activities could be completed as planned. Figure 3. First pass (shaded region) S/C rates measured by the gyroscopes. The S/C follows the planned damping in X and Z axes and achieves a rate equal to -8 times the orbital period in Y axis. The S-band transponder was set to incoherent mode to avoid noisy signal at initial acquisition. This implies that no 2-way Doppler measurements were performed during the first pass. Both ground stations acquired the S/C signal and remained in auto-track during the whole pass duration; the carrier uplink was performed first at Svalbard and it was passed to Alaska before the end of the combined pass. Svalbard station reported time offset values (TOV) of 0.3 seconds and 1 second S/C late at the start and end of the pass respectively. Alaska reported 1.5 seconds S/C early at the beginning of the pass. The FD Orbit Determination Team performed an injection orbit assessment at the end of the first ground pass using angular and ranging data retrieved from both stations. 4 A coarse orbit determination employing this set of tracking data did not lead to a conclusive state vector determination. Solutions with a semi-major axis difference with respect to the nominal injection varying from -4.0 to -8.0 km were obtained with similar goodness-of-fit. The reported TOVs by the two stations were contradicting and therefore could not be trusted to decide which orbit solution could be used to generate TOV predictions for the upcoming pass. Consequently FD did not provide a TOV for the subsequent Troll pass but only an indication to expect AOS earlier than predicted. Troll station acquired the Sentinel-1A signal without difficulties, reporting a 1 second early TOV at the beginning of the pass, evolving to 2 seconds early before LOS. At the end of the pass a new assessment of the orbit injection was performed using the ranging and angular tracking data retrieved after the Troll pass.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • OUFTI-1 Environmental Impact Assessment
    Date: 11/02/2016 Issue: 1 Rev: 1 Page: 1 of 11 OUFTI-1 Environmental Impact Assessment Reference 3_OUF_ENV_IMPACT_1.0 Issue/Rev Issue 1 Rev 0 Date 11/02/2016 Distribution OUFTI-1 team OUFTI-1 Environmental Impact Assessment Date: 11/02/2016 Issue: 1 Rev: 1 Page: 2 of 11 AUTHORS Name Email Telephone X. Werner [email protected] +32 4 366 37 38 S. De Dijcker [email protected] +32 4 366 37 38 RECORD OF REVISIONS Iss/Rev Date Author Section/page Change description 1/0 11/02/2016 X.Werner, All Initial issue S. De Dijcker Copyright University of Liège [2016]. OUFTI-1 Environmental Impact Assessment Date: 11/02/2016 Issue: 1 Rev: 1 Page: 3 of 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS Authors ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Record of revisions ..................................................................................................................... 2 1. Activities and Objectives ................................................................................................... 4 1.1. Project description ....................................................................................................... 4 1.2. Soyuz launch vehicle ................................................................................................... 5 1.3. Arianespace ................................................................................................................. 7 1.4. Conclusion ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Exploration of the Moon
    Exploration of the Moon The physical exploration of the Moon began when Luna 2, a space probe launched by the Soviet Union, made an impact on the surface of the Moon on September 14, 1959. Prior to that the only available means of exploration had been observation from Earth. The invention of the optical telescope brought about the first leap in the quality of lunar observations. Galileo Galilei is generally credited as the first person to use a telescope for astronomical purposes; having made his own telescope in 1609, the mountains and craters on the lunar surface were among his first observations using it. NASA's Apollo program was the first, and to date only, mission to successfully land humans on the Moon, which it did six times. The first landing took place in 1969, when astronauts placed scientific instruments and returnedlunar samples to Earth. Apollo 12 Lunar Module Intrepid prepares to descend towards the surface of the Moon. NASA photo. Contents Early history Space race Recent exploration Plans Past and future lunar missions See also References External links Early history The ancient Greek philosopher Anaxagoras (d. 428 BC) reasoned that the Sun and Moon were both giant spherical rocks, and that the latter reflected the light of the former. His non-religious view of the heavens was one cause for his imprisonment and eventual exile.[1] In his little book On the Face in the Moon's Orb, Plutarch suggested that the Moon had deep recesses in which the light of the Sun did not reach and that the spots are nothing but the shadows of rivers or deep chasms.
    [Show full text]
  • Spacex CRS-4 National Aeronautics and Fourth Commercial Resupply Services Flight Space Administration
    SpaceX CRS-4 National Aeronautics and Fourth Commercial Resupply Services Flight Space Administration to the International Space Station September 2014 OVERVIEW The Dragon spacecraft will be filled with more than 5,000 pounds of supplies and payloads, including critical materials to support 255 science and research investigations that will occur during Expeditions 41 and 42. Dragon will carry three powered cargo payloads in its pressurized section and two in its unpressurized trunk. Science payloads will enable model organism research using rodents, fruit flies and plants. A special science payload is the ISS-Rapid Scatterometer to monitor ocean surface wind speed and direction. Several new technology demonstrations aboard will enable bone density studies, test how a small satellite moves and positions itself in space using new thruster technology, and use the first 3-D printer in space for additive manufacturing. The mission also delivers IMAX cameras for filming during four increments and replacement batteries for the spacesuits. After four weeks at the space station, the spacecraft will return with about 3,800 pounds of cargo, including crew supplies, hardware and computer resources, science experiments, space station hardware, and four powered payloads. DRAGON CARGO LAUNCH ITEMS RETURN ITEMS TOTAL CARGO: 4885 lbs / 2216 kg 3276 lbs / 1486 kg · Crew Supplies 1380 lbs / 626 kg 132 lbs / 60 kg Crew care packages Crew provisions Food · Vehicle Hardware 403 lbs / 183 kg 937 lbs / 425 kg Crew Health Care System hardware Environment Control & Life Support equipment Electrical Power System hardware Extravehicular Robotics equipment Flight Crew Equipment Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency equipment · Science Investigations 1644 lbs / 746 kg 2075 lbs / 941 kg U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • NUCLEAR SAFETY LAUNCH APPROVAL: MULTI-MISSION LESSONS LEARNED Yale Chang the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
    ANS NETS 2018 – Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space Las Vegas, NV, February 26 – March 1, 2018, on CD-ROM, American Nuclear Society, LaGrange Park, IL (2018) NUCLEAR SAFETY LAUNCH APPROVAL: MULTI-MISSION LESSONS LEARNED Yale Chang The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Rd, Laurel, MD 20723 240-228-5724; [email protected] Launching a NASA radioisotope power system (RPS) trajectory to Saturn used a Venus-Venus-Earth-Jupiter mission requires compliance with two Federal mandates: Gravity Assist (VVEJGA) maneuver, where the Earth the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) Gravity Assist (EGA) flyby was the primary nuclear safety and launch approval (LA), as directed by Presidential focus of NASA, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), the Directive/National Security Council Memorandum 25. Cassini Interagency Nuclear Safety Review Panel Nuclear safety launch approval lessons learned from (INSRP), and the public alike. A solid propellant fire test multiple NASA RPS missions, one Russian RPS mission, campaign addressed the MPF finding and led in part to two non-RPS launch accidents, and several solid the retrofit solid propellant breakup systems (BUSs) propellant fire test campaigns since 1996 are shown to designed and carried by MER-A and MER-B spacecraft have contributed to an ever-growing body of knowledge. and the deployment of plutonium detectors in the launch The launch accidents can be viewed as “unplanned area for PNH. The PNH mission decreased the calendar experiments” that provided real-world data. Lessons length of the NEPA/LA processes to less than 4 years by learned from the nuclear safety launch approval effort of incorporating lessons learned from previous missions and each mission or launch accident, and how they were tests in its spacecraft and mission designs and their applied to improve the NEPA/LA processes and nuclear NEPA/LA processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Design for Demise Analysis for Launch Vehicles
    A first design for demise analysis for launch vehicles Henrik Simon, Stijn Lemmens Space debris: Inactive, manmade objects in space Source: ESA Overview Introduction Fundamentals Modelling approach Results and discussion Summary and outlook What is the motivation and task? INTRODUCTION Motivation . Mitigation: Prevention of creation and limitation of long-term presence . Guidelines: LEO removal within 25 years . LEO removal within 25 years after mission end . Casualty risk limit for re-entry: 1 in 10,000 Rising altitude Decay & re-entry above 2000 km Source: NASA Source: NASA Solution: Design for demise Source: ESA Scope of the thesis . Typical design of upper stages . General Risk assessment . Design for demise solutions to reduce the risk ? ? ? Risk A Risk B Risk C Source: CNES How do we assess the risk and simulate the re-entry? FUNDAMENTALS Fundamentals: Ground risk assessment Ah = + 2 Ai � ℎ = =1 � Source: NASA Source: NASA 3.5 m 5.0 m 2 2 ≈ ≈ Fundamentals: Re-entry simulation tools SCARAB: Spacecraft-oriented approach . CAD-like modelling . 6 DoF flight dynamics . Break-up / fragmentation computed How does a rocket upper stage look like? MODELLING Modelling approach . Research on typical design: . Elongated . Platform . Solid Rocket Motor . Lack of information: . Create common intersection . Deliberately stay top-level and only compare effects Modelling approach Modelling approach 12 Length [m] 9 7 5 3 2 150 300 500 700 800 1500 2200 Mass [kg] How much is the risk and how can we reduce it? SIMULATIONS Example of SCARAB re-entry simulation 6x Casualty risk of all reference cases Typical survivors Smaller Smaller fragments fragments Pressure tanks Pressure tanks Main tank Engine Main structure + tanks Design for Demise .
    [Show full text]
  • Enabling Interstellar Probe
    This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit: http://www.elsevier.com/copyright Author's personal copy Acta Astronautica 68 (2011) 790–801 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Acta Astronautica journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/actaastro Enabling interstellar probe Ralph L. McNutt Jr.a,n, Robert F. Wimmer-Schweingruber b,1, the International Interstellar Probe Team a The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Road, M/S MP3-E128, Laurel, MD 20723, USA b Institut fuer Experimentelle und Angewandte Physik, University of Kiel, Leibnizstrasse 11, D-24118 Kiel, Germany article info abstract Article history: The scientific community has advocated a scientific probe to the interstellar medium for Received 15 February 2010 over 30 years. While the Voyager spacecraft have passed through the termination shock Received in revised form of the solar wind, they have limited lifetimes as their radioisotope power supplies 16 June 2010 decay. It remains unclear whether they can reach the heliopause, the boundary between Accepted 2 July 2010 shocked solar wind and interstellar plasmas, and, in any case, they will not reach the Available online 17 August 2010 undisturbed interstellar medium.
    [Show full text]
  • Sentinel-1A Launch
    SENTINEL-1A LAUNCH Arianespace’s seventh Soyuz launch from the Guiana Space Center will orbit Sentinel-1A, the first satellite in Europe’s Earth observation program, Copernicus. The European Space Agency (ESA) chose Thales Alenia Space to design, develop and build the satellite, as well as perform related tests. Copernicus is the new name for the European program previously known as GMES (Global Monitoring for Environment and Security), and is the European Commission’s second major space program, following Galileo. Copernicus is designed to give Europe continuous, independent and reliable access to Earth observation data. With the Soyuz, Ariane 5 and Vega launchers at the Guiana Space Center (CSG), Arianespace is the only launch services provider in the world capable of launching all types of payloads into all orbits, from the smallest to the largest geostationary satellites, from satellite clusters for constellations to cargo missions for the International Space Station (ISS). Arianespace sets the launch services standard for all operators, whether commercial or governmental, and guarantees access to space for scientific missions. Sentinel-1A is the 50th satellite with an Earth observation payload to be launched by Arianespace. Arianespace has seven more Earth observation missions in its order book, including four commercial missions (signed in 2013 and 2014). The Copernicus program is designed to give Europe complete independence in the acquisition and management of environmental data concerning our planet. ESA’s Sentinel programs comprise five satellite families: Sentinel-1, to provide continuity for radar data from ERS and Envisat. Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-3, dedicated to the observation of the Earth and its oceans.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Paper
    GIOVE-A’S FREGAT DISPOSAL ASSESSMENT D. Navarro-Reyes(1), R. Zandbergen(2), D. Escobar(3) (1)ESA/ESTEC, Keplerlaan 1, 2200 AG Noordwijk, The Netherlands, Email: [email protected] (2) ESA/ESOC, Robert-Bosch-Str. 5, D-64293 Darmstadt, Germany, Email: [email protected] (3)GMV at ESOC, ESA/ESOC Robert-Bosch-Str. 5, D-64293 Darmstadt, Germany, Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT dedicated stations deployed around the world. The Galileo constellation is defined as a Walker 27/3/1 and is composed of 3 equally-spaced orbital planes with a Galileo will be Europe’s own global navigation satellite nominal inclination of 56 degrees and a semi-major axis system, providing a highly accurate, guaranteed global of 29,600 km. Each plane will contain nine equally- positioning service under civilian control. Following the spaced satellites plus a spare satellite. The first launches approval of Galileo in 1999, a demonstration element are foreseen in 2010, with the full constellation was added – the Galileo System Test Bed (GSTB) with deployed by end 2013. the GIOVE-A and GIOVE-B satellites – to allow early experimentation with the navigation signals and services Following the approval of Galileo in 1999, a before committing to the final constellation design. demonstration element was added – the Galileo System Test Bed (GSTB) with the GIOVE-A and GIOVE-B GIOVE-A (launched on 28 Dec 2005) and GIOVE-B satellites, whose mission was: (launched on 26 April 2008) were injected in the Galileo operational orbit (semi-major axis 29600 km, x To secure use of the frequencies allocated by the circular orbit, inclination 56 degrees) by direct injection International Telecommunications Union (ITU) for with Soyuz/FREGAT launch vehicle.
    [Show full text]
  • Please Type Your Paper Title Here In
    Estimating the Reliability of a Soyuz Spacecraft Mission Michael G. Lutomskia*, Steven J. Farnham IIb, and Warren C. Grantb aNASA-JSC, Houston, TX – [email protected] bARES Corporation, Houston, TX Abstract: Once the US Space Shuttle retires in 2010, the Russian Soyuz Launcher and Soyuz Spacecraft will comprise the only means for crew transportation to and from the International Space Station (ISS). The U.S. Government and NASA have contracted for crew transportation services to the ISS with Russia. The resulting implications for the US space program including issues such as astronaut safety must be carefully considered. Are the astronauts and cosmonauts safer on the Soyuz than the Space Shuttle system? Is the Soyuz launch system more robust than the Space Shuttle? Is it safer to continue to fly the 30 year old Shuttle fleet for crew transportation and cargo resupply than the Soyuz? Should we extend the life of the Shuttle Program? How does the development of the Orion/Ares crew transportation system affect these decisions? The Soyuz launcher has been in operation for over 40 years. There have been only two loss of life incidents and two loss of mission incidents. Given that the most recent incident took place in 1983, how do we determine current reliability of the system? Do failures of unmanned Soyuz rockets impact the reliability of the currently operational man-rated launcher? Does the Soyuz exhibit characteristics that demonstrate reliability growth and how would that be reflected in future estimates of success? NASA’s next manned rocket and spacecraft development project is currently underway.
    [Show full text]
  • Securing Japan an Assessment of Japan´S Strategy for Space
    Full Report Securing Japan An assessment of Japan´s strategy for space Report: Title: “ESPI Report 74 - Securing Japan - Full Report” Published: July 2020 ISSN: 2218-0931 (print) • 2076-6688 (online) Editor and publisher: European Space Policy Institute (ESPI) Schwarzenbergplatz 6 • 1030 Vienna • Austria Phone: +43 1 718 11 18 -0 E-Mail: [email protected] Website: www.espi.or.at Rights reserved - No part of this report may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or for any purpose without permission from ESPI. Citations and extracts to be published by other means are subject to mentioning “ESPI Report 74 - Securing Japan - Full Report, July 2020. All rights reserved” and sample transmission to ESPI before publishing. ESPI is not responsible for any losses, injury or damage caused to any person or property (including under contract, by negligence, product liability or otherwise) whether they may be direct or indirect, special, incidental or consequential, resulting from the information contained in this publication. Design: copylot.at Cover page picture credit: European Space Agency (ESA) TABLE OF CONTENT 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background and rationales ............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Objectives of the Study ................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Methodology
    [Show full text]
  • The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017
    Federal Aviation Administration The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 January 2017 Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 i Contents About the FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 51 United States Code, Subtitle V, Chapter 509 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). FAA AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA AST is directed to encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found on FAA AST’s website: http://www.faa.gov/go/ast Cover art: Phil Smith, The Tauri Group (2017) Publication produced for FAA AST by The Tauri Group under contract. NOTICE Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. ii Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 GENERAL CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 Introduction 5 Launch Vehicles 9 Launch and Reentry Sites 21 Payloads 35 2016 Launch Events 39 2017 Annual Commercial Space Transportation Forecast 45 Space Transportation Law and Policy 83 Appendices 89 Orbital Launch Vehicle Fact Sheets 100 iii Contents DETAILED CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment and Combination of SMAP and Sentinel-1A/B-Derived Soil Moisture Estimates with Land Surface Model Outputs in the Mid-Atlantic Coastal Plain, USA
    This article has been accepted for inclusion in a future issue of this journal. Content is final as presented, with the exception of pagination. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING 1 Assessment and Combination of SMAP and Sentinel-1A/B-Derived Soil Moisture Estimates With Land Surface Model Outputs in the Mid-Atlantic Coastal Plain, USA Hyunglok Kim , Sangchul Lee, Michael H. Cosh , Senior Member, IEEE, Venkataraman Lakshmi , Yonghwan Kwon, and Gregory W. McCarty Abstract— Prediction of large-scale water-related natural further evaluation of the three SM products, and the maximize-R disasters such as droughts, floods, wildfires, landslides, and method was applied to combine SMAP and NoahMP36 SM data. dust outbreaks can benefit from the high spatial resolution CDF-matched 9-, 3-, and 1-km SMAP SM data showed reliable soil moisture (SM) data of satellite and modeled products performance: R and ubRMSD values of the CDF-matched SMAP because antecedent SM conditions in the topsoil layer govern products were 0.658, 0.626, and 0.570 and 0.049, 0.053, and the partitioning of precipitation into infiltration and runoff. 0.055 m3/m3, respectively. When SMAP and NoahMP36 were SM data retrieved from Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) combined, the R-values for the 9-, 3-, and 1-km SMAP SM data have proved to be an effective method of monitoring SM content were greatly improved: R-values were 0.825, 0.804, and 0.795, at different spatial resolutions: 1) radiometer-based product and ubRMSDs were 0.034, 0.036, and 0.037 m3/m3, respectively.
    [Show full text]