DOCSLIB.ORG

Report of the Plant Diagnostic Laboratory at North Dakota State

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2017 Annual Report for the North Dakota State University Extension Plant Diagnostic Lab January 1 through December 31, 2017 Available on-line at http://www.ag.ndsu.edu/pdl Compiled by Jesse Ostrander, Alexander Knudson, and Presley Mosher NDSU Plant Diagnostic Lab Department of Plant Pathology College of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Natural Resources Table of Contents About the Lab ................................................................................................................ 3 PERSONNEL ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 NATIONAL PLANT DIAGNOSTIC NETWORK AND NPDN FIRST DETECTOR TRAINING ........................................ 3 ACTIVITIES OF THE NDSU PLANT DIAGNOSTIC LAB ......................................................................................... 4 2017 ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND HIGHLIGHTS ...................................................................................................... 4 Services and Fees ......................................................................................................... 5 Fee Waivers for Extension Personnel ......................................................................... 5 Turn-Around Time ......................................................................................................... 6 Lab Statistics ................................................................................................................. 7 TOTAL SAMPLES RECEIVED BY YEAR, 1991 THROUGH 2017 .............................................................................. 7 MONTHLY SAMPLE SUBMISSION 2013 THROUGH 2017 ...................................................................................... 8 NORTH DAKOTA SAMPLES BY COUNTY 2017 .................................................................................................... 9 OUT-OF-STATE SAMPLES 2017 ........................................................................................................................... 9 TOTAL NUMBER OF SAMPLES RECEIVED BY SAMPLE CATEGORY, 2017.......................................................... 10 ROUTINE DIAGNOSES RECEIVED IN 2017 ......................................................................................................... 11 DUTCH ELM DISEASE IN ND AND MN ............................................................................................................. 12 SEED HEALTH AND PHYTOSANITARY SAMPLES OF 2017 ................................................................................. 13 2017 Sample Details .................................................................................................... 13 Specialists consulted .................................................................................................. 26 Page 2 of 27 NDSU Plant Diagnostic Lab Annual Report 2017 About the Lab Since 1962, the NDSU Plant Diagnostic Lab has helped individuals and professionals in agriculture and horticulture identify plant pests, diseases, cultural and environmental problems. While the majority of our samples come from the local community, samples originated from 27 different states and Canada in 2017. Before submitting a sample to the NDSU Plant Diagnostic Lab, consider calling or emailing us. In many cases we are able to offer assistance without receiving a physical sample. In other instances, it might be necessary to aide in sample collection. For more information, please visit our webpage: https://www.ag.ndsu.edu/pdl If you submit a sample to the NDSU Plant Diagnostic Lab for seed health testing or phytosanitary testing, a modest fee may apply to offset the costs of lab technicians and supplies. Routine diagnostic fees are waived for some services for some clients. Commercial entities are not exempt from fees; homeowners may be in the event that no third-party supplies are used and samples are not received in bulk. For more information, please refer to page 5 or contact the lab directly. Current fee rates for commonly requested services are available online at https://www.ag.ndsu.edu/pdl/services-and-fees. Other services not listed or bulk pricing may be available on request. We consider it our mission to serve the agricultural/horticultural/forestry community on all levels. Doing so requires a flexible and responsive work ethic. Personnel The lab supports a lead diagnostician/director and up to three full-time support personnel. The lab also employs several hourly students at various times throughout the year. Lab technicians and hourly help (as well as supplies and equipment) are supported with funds generated by the lab. Since 2016, Jesse Ostrander (MS, Plant Pathology) is the current director of the lab and previously, plant diagnostician (since 2013). Aimee Thapa (BS, Horticulture) is the extension administrative assistant who supports the lab. Christine Ngoan (MS, Botany) joined the lab as the Seed Health Technician in 2017. Alex Knudson (MS, Entomology) is the acting entomological diagnostician. The assistant diagnostician position was vacant for all of 2017. National Plant Diagnostic Network and NPDN First Detector Training The National Plant Diagnostic Network (NPDN) was established in 2002 and consists of five regions. The NDSU Plant Diagnostic Lab is a member of the Great Plains Diagnostic Network (GPDN), a 9-state region of the NPDN. The NPDN provides critical diagnostic training for plant diagnosticians around the country as well as a means of secure communication among plant diagnosticians and regulatory personnel if high risk plant pest threats occur. Its mission stresses the importance of early detection of pests that can negatively impact our agricultural, forestry, natural, or horticultural resources, and to this end the NPDN, via the NDSU PDL, offers NPDN First Detector training in North Dakota through face-to-face training events or online training. NPDN website: https://www.npdn.org/ GPDN website: https://www.npdn.org/gpdn County extension agents: For a programming idea for your county, consider offering NPDN First Detector training. Learn how by contacting the Plant Diagnostic Lab. A registered NPDN First Detector is any individual in agriculture, horticulture, or forestry who has undergone NPDN First Detector training and who has volunteered to become registered with the NPDN. Professionals and master gardeners who are involved in some way with agriculture, forestry, or horticulture are especially encouraged to consider becoming registered NPDN First Detectors. Self-directed training, via on-line training modules, is available at http://firstdetector.org/. After successfully completing three or more of the online modules, Page 3 of 27 individuals may call the NDSU Plant Diagnostic Lab to become registered in the NPDN First Detector national database, although registration is optional/not required. Face-to-face NPDN First Detector training is an option, and it may be possible to arrange a session near you if interest exists. Contact the lab if you would like to become a registered NPDN First Detector (phone: 701-231-7854; email: [email protected]). Activities of the NDSU Plant Diagnostic Lab Our goal is to provide economical, unbiased plant and pest diagnostic services to agricultural professionals, the horticulture/turf/forestry industries, homeowners, and individuals in North Dakota. We can accept samples of plants, soil, and insects from throughout the United States including Alaska and Hawaii. 2017 Accomplishments and Highlights • The lab once again processed a higher-than average number of samples in 2017. • The lab maintained USDA certification to test for bacterial ring rot to fulfill requirements of the Canadian Seed Potato Certification Program, for seed destined to be sold as certified seed in Canada. • We continued to support the Master Gardener program and other horticultural community programs. • Christine Ngoan (MS, Botany) joined the lab as the Seed Health Technician this year. • The lab expanded its seed health testing to include Dickeya spp. and PMTV/TRV screening services. • In addition to offering routine diagnostic services, we continued to provide: o seed health testing for seed growers o phytosanitary testing to support the efforts of the North Dakota Department of Agriculture to facilitate exportation of ND crops o research support services for faculty and private entities Page 4 of 27 NDSU Plant Diagnostic Lab Annual Report 2017 Services and Fees By nature we are flexible and adaptable, and it is not possible to list everything we can do. For a list of our most common services and their current fee rates, please visit our webpage at: https://www.ag.ndsu.edu/pdl/services-and-fees or contact us by phone. Please contact the lab (phone: 701.231.7854; email [email protected]) for information on special tests, bulk pricing, or research/survey support options not listed – we are flexible and may be able to offer the services necessary to fulfill your needs. Fee Waivers for Extension Personnel The lab offers fee waivers for Extension Personnel. In 2017, samples referred (or submitted) to the lab by Extension Personnel for non-commercial clients usually qualified for a fee waiver. The purpose of these waivers is to help foster relationships between extension personnel and their stakeholders. These waivers were used to waive the following fees: • routine diagnosis • culture (including the Dutch elm disease culture test) • herbicide injury evaluation (visual
Recommended publications
  • Insects of Western North America 4. Survey of Selected Insect Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma 2

    Insects of Western North America 4. Survey of Selected Insect Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma 2

    Insects of Western North America 4. Survey of Selected Insect Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma 2. Dragonflies (Odonata), Stoneflies (Plecoptera) and selected Moths (Lepidoptera) Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Survey of Selected Insect Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma 2. Dragonflies (Odonata), Stoneflies (Plecoptera) and selected Moths (Lepidoptera) by Boris C. Kondratieff, Paul A. Opler, Matthew C. Garhart, and Jason P. Schmidt C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 March 15, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration (top to bottom): Widow Skimmer (Libellula luctuosa) [photo ©Robert Behrstock], Stonefly (Perlesta species) [photo © David H. Funk, White- lined Sphinx (Hyles lineata) [photo © Matthew C. Garhart] ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 Copyrighted 2004 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY……………………………………………………………………………….…1 INTRODUCTION…………………………………………..…………………………………………….…3 OBJECTIVE………………………………………………………………………………………….………5 Site Descriptions………………………………………….. METHODS AND MATERIALS…………………………………………………………………………….5 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION………………………………………………………………………..…...11 Dragonflies………………………………………………………………………………….……..11
  • Title Development of Simple Detection Methods of Plant Pathogenic Oomycetes( 本文(Fulltext) ) Author(S) FENG, WENZHUO Report N

    Title Development of Simple Detection Methods of Plant Pathogenic Oomycetes( 本文(Fulltext) ) Author(S) FENG, WENZHUO Report N

    Development of Simple Detection Methods of Plant Pathogenic Title Oomycetes( 本文(Fulltext) ) Author(s) FENG, WENZHUO Report No.(Doctoral Degree) 博士(農学) 甲第708号 Issue Date 2019-03-13 Type 博士論文 Version ETD URL http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12099/77944 ※この資料の著作権は、各資料の著者・学協会・出版社等に帰属します。 Development of Simple Detection Methods of Plant Pathogenic Oomycetes （植物病原性卵菌類の簡易検出法の開発） 2018 The United Graduate School of Agriculture Science, Gifu University Science of Biological Environment (Gifu University) FENG WENZHUO Development of Simple Detection Methods of Plant Pathogenic Oomycetes （植物病原性卵菌類の簡易検出法の開発） FENG WENZHUO INDEX PREFACE .......................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 1 Establishment of simple LAMP procedures with detection of Pythium irregulare in field samples ................................................................... 12 MATERIALS AND METHODS ..................................................................................... 13 RESULTS ................................................................................................................... 17 1. Primer design and specificity ............................................................................... 17 2. Sensitivity of LAMP ............................................................................................. 18 3. Practical detection of P. irregulare in field samples .............................................. 18 DISCUSSION ............................................................................................................
  • Natural Features Inventory and Management Recommendations for Huron Meadows and Lake Erie Metroparks

    Natural Features Inventory and Management Recommendations for Huron Meadows and Lake Erie Metroparks

    Natural Features Inventory and Management Recommendations for Huron Meadows and Lake Erie Metroparks Prepared by: Michael A. Kost, Joshua G. Cohen, Ryan P. O’Connor, and Helen D. Enander Michigan Natural Features Inventory P.O. Box 30444 Lansing, MI 48909-7944 For: Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority 13000 High Ridge Drive Brighton, MI 48114 March 31, 2005 Report Number 2005-05 Cover photograph: Joshua Cohen, MNFI Ecologist, in a prairie fen with tamarack swamp in the background at Huron Meadows Metropark (Photo by Michael Kost). TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Landscape Context ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Vegetation circa 1800.................................................................................................................................. 2 Present Land Cover ..................................................................................................................................... 3 METHODS .................................................................................................................................................... 13 Natural Communities ................................................................................................................................ 13 Rare Plant Inventories ..............................................................................................................................
  • Reptiles and Amphibians

    Reptiles and Amphibians

    A good book for beginners is Himmelman’s (2002) book “Discovering Moths’. Winter Moths (2000) describes several methods for By Dennis Skadsen capturing and observing moths including the use of light traps and sugar baits. There are Unlike butterflies, very little fieldwork has a few other essential books listed in the been completed to determine species suggested references section located on composition and distribution of moths in pages 8 & 9. Many moth identification northeast South Dakota. This is partly due guides can now be found on the internet, the to the fact moths are harder to capture and North Dakota and Iowa sites are the most study because most adults are nocturnal, and useful for our area. Since we often identification to species is difficult in the encounter the caterpillars of moths more field. Many adults can only be often than adults, having a guide like differentiated by studying specimens in the Wagners (2005) is essential. hand with a good understanding of moth taxonomy. Listed below are just a few of the species that probably occur in northeast South Although behavior and several physiological Dakota. The list is compiled from the characteristics separate moths from author’s personnel collection, and specimens butterflies including flight periods (moths collected by Gary Marrone or listed in Opler are mainly nocturnal (night) and butterflies (2006). Common and scientific names diurnal (day)); the shapes of antennae and follow Moths of North Dakota (2007) or wings; each have similar life histories. Both Opler (2006). moths and butterflies complete a series of changes from egg to adult called metamorphosis.
  • Are Pollinating Hawk Moths Declining in the Northeastern United States? an Analysis of Collection Records

    Are Pollinating Hawk Moths Declining in the Northeastern United States? an Analysis of Collection Records

    RESEARCH ARTICLE Are pollinating hawk moths declining in the Northeastern United States? An analysis of collection records Bruce E. Young1*, Stephanie Auer1☯, Margaret Ormes1☯, Giovanni Rapacciuolo1,2☯, Dale Schweitzer1,3☯, Nicole Sears1☯ 1 NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia, United States of America, 2 Department of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America, 3 Port Norris, New Jersey, United States of America a1111111111 a1111111111 ☯ These authors contributed equally to this work. a1111111111 * [email protected] a1111111111 a1111111111 Abstract Increasing attention to pollinators and their role in providing ecosystem services has revealed a paucity of studies on long-term population trends of most insect pollinators in OPEN ACCESS many parts of the world. Because targeted monitoring programs are resource intensive and Citation: Young BE, Auer S, Ormes M, Rapacciuolo G, Schweitzer D, Sears N (2017) Are pollinating unlikely to be performed on most insect pollinators, we took advantage of existing collection hawk moths declining in the Northeastern United records to examine long-term trends in northeastern United States populations of 26 spe- States? An analysis of collection records. PLoS cies of hawk moths (family Sphingidae) that are presumed to be pollinators. We compiled ONE 12(10): e0185683. https://doi.org/10.1371/ over 6,600 records from nine museum and 14 private collections that spanned a 112-year journal.pone.0185683 period, and used logistic generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) to examine long-term Editor: Maohua Chen, Northwest A&F University, population trends. We controlled for uneven sampling effort by adding a covariate for list CHINA length, the number of species recorded during each sampling event.
  • Species and Habitat Profiles Prepared by Terwilliger Consulting Inc

    Species and Habitat Profiles Prepared by Terwilliger Consulting Inc

    Rhode Island Wildlife Action Plan Species and Habitat Profiles Prepared by Terwilliger Consulting Inc. for The Rhode Island Chapter of The Nature Conservancy for The Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management Division of Fish and Wildlife Rhode Island Wildlife Action Plan Species and Habitat Profiles Table of Contents Introduction to the Species and Habitat Profiles...................................................................... ii Key to Status Ranks .................................................................................................................iv Mammal Table of Contents ....................................................................................................vii Bird Species Table of Contents...............................................................................................viii Herpetofauna Table of Contents.............................................................................................xii Fish Species Table of Contents...............................................................................................xiii Invertebrate Table of Contents...............................................................................................xv Key Habitat Table of Contents .............................................................................................. xxii i Rhode Island Wildlife Action Plan Species and Habitat Profiles Introduction to the Species and Habitat Profiles New to the 2015 Rhode Island Wildlife Action Plan Revision are the Species and Habitat
  • 1 Modern Threats to the Lepidoptera Fauna in The

    1 Modern Threats to the Lepidoptera Fauna in The

    MODERN THREATS TO THE LEPIDOPTERA FAUNA IN THE FLORIDA ECOSYSTEM By THOMSON PARIS A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2011 1 2011 Thomson Paris 2 To my mother and father who helped foster my love for butterflies 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First, I thank my family who have provided advice, support, and encouragement throughout this project. I especially thank my sister and brother for helping to feed and label larvae throughout the summer. Second, I thank Hillary Burgess and Fairchild Tropical Gardens, Dr. Jonathan Crane and the University of Florida Tropical Research and Education center Homestead, FL, Elizabeth Golden and Bill Baggs Cape Florida State Park, Leroy Rogers and South Florida Water Management, Marshall and Keith at Mack’s Fish Camp, Susan Casey and Casey’s Corner Nursery, and Michael and EWM Realtors Inc. for giving me access to collect larvae on their land and for their advice and assistance. Third, I thank Ryan Fessendon and Lary Reeves for helping to locate sites to collect larvae and for assisting me to collect larvae. I thank Dr. Marc Minno, Dr. Roxanne Connely, Dr. Charles Covell, Dr. Jaret Daniels for sharing their knowledge, advice, and ideas concerning this project. Fourth, I thank my committee, which included Drs. Thomas Emmel and James Nation, who provided guidance and encouragement throughout my project. Finally, I am grateful to the Chair of my committee and my major advisor, Dr. Andrei Sourakov, for his invaluable counsel, and for serving as a model of excellence of what it means to be a scientist.
  • ABSTRACT REEVES, ELLA ROBYN. Pythium Spp. Associated with Root

    ABSTRACT REEVES, ELLA ROBYN. Pythium Spp. Associated with Root

    ABSTRACT REEVES, ELLA ROBYN. Pythium spp. Associated with Root Rot and Stunting of Winter Field and Cover Crops in North Carolina. (Under the direction of Dr. Barbara Shew and Dr. Jim Kerns). Soft red winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) was valued at over $66 million in North Carolina in 2019, but mild to severe stunting and root rot limit yields in the Coastal Plain region during years with above-average rainfall. Pythium irregulare, P. vanterpoolii, and P. spinosum were previously identified as causal agents of stunting and root rot of winter wheat in this region. Annual double-crop rotation systems that incorporate winter wheat, or other winter crops such as clary sage, rapeseed, or a cover crop are common in the Coastal Plain of North Carolina. Stunting and root rot reduce yields of clary sage, and limit stand establishment and biomass accumulation of other winter crops in wet soils, but the role that Pythium spp. play in root rot of these crops is not understood, To investigate species prevalence, isolates of Pythium were collected from stunted winter wheat, clary sage, rye, rapeseed, and winter pea plants collected in eastern North Carolina during the growing season of 2018-2019, and from all crops except winter wheat again in 2019-2020. A total of 534 isolates were identified from all hosts. P. irregulare (32%), P. vanterpoolii (17%), and P. spinosum (16%) were the species most frequently recovered from wheat. P. irregulare (37% of all isolates) and members of the species complex Pythium sp. cluster B2A (28% of all isolates) comprised the majority of isolates collected from clary sage, rye, rapeseed, and winter pea.
  • Pollination of Western Prairie Fringed Orchid, Platanthera Praeclara Sheviak & Bowles: Implications for Restoration and Management

    Pollination of Western Prairie Fringed Orchid, Platanthera Praeclara Sheviak & Bowles: Implications for Restoration and Management

    Pollination of Western Prairie Fringed Orchid, Platanthera praeclara Sheviak & Bowles: implications for restoration and management Laura Phillips Introduction The beautiful western prairie fringed orchid, Platanthera praeclara, was once widespread in the tallgrass prairies across the upper Midwest (Sheviak and Bowles 1986). As Europeans settled North America, they discovered the fertile soils that lay beneath tallgrass prairies and began converting these vast grasslands into agricultural cropland. Some prairie lands were spared the plow only to be altered instead by suppression of the historic fire regimes that had maintained the prairie community for thousands of years. Today, only one percent of original tallgrass prairie remains, mostly in small, relatively isolated fragments, often surrounded by agricultural lands and urban development, and many are further threatened by invasion of non-native species and native woody species that now thrive in the fire-free environment (Kline 1997). Many of the unique plant species of the tallgrass prairie community, including P. praeclara, have also suffered great population declines in response to the loss of suitable habitat. The western and eastern prairie fringed orchids, P. praeclara and P. leucophaea, have declined by more than 70%, according to original county records (Bowles 1983), and therefore in 1989 they were listed as a federally threatened species under the Endangered Species Act (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1996). Habitat loss is considered the greatest threat to the prairie fringed orchids, therefore current management plans focus primarily on maintaining quality prairie habitat using standard restoration techniques, such as burning and mowing (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1996). Although the survival of P.
  • Caracterización De Especies Fitopatógenas De

    Caracterización De Especies Fitopatógenas De

    CARACTERIZACIÓN DE ESPECIES FITOPATÓGENAS DE PYTHIUM Y PHYTOPHTHORA (PERONOSPOROMYCETES) EN CULTIVOS ORNAMENTALES DEL CINTURÓN VERDE LA PLATA-BUENOS AIRES Y OTRAS ÁREAS Y CULTIVOS DE INTERÉS TESIS PARA OPTAR AL TÍTULO DE DOCTOR EN CIENCIAS NATURALES FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS NATURALES Y MUSEO UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE LA PLATA HEMILSE ELENA PALMUCCI DIRECTOR: ING. AGR. SILVIA WOLCAN CODIRECTOR: DRA MÓNICA STECIOW AÑO 2015 1 AGRADECIMIENTOS A la Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo (FCNYM) por brindarme la posibilidad de realizar este trabajo A la Ing Agr Silvia Wolcan y a la Dra Mónica Steciow por sus sugerencias y comentarios en la ejecución y escritura de esta tesis. A la Dra Gloria Abad, investigadora líder en Oomycetes en el “USDA- Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory (MDL)”, por su invalorable y generosa colaboración en mi formación a través de sus conocimientos, por brindarme la posibilidad de llevar a cabo los trabajos moleculares en el MDL-Maryland-USA y apoyar mi participación en workshops internacionales y reuniones de la especialidad. A la Ing Wolcan por aportar su valiosa colección para realizar parte de las tareas de identificación y por los significativos aportes realizados desde su experiencia. A la Dra Gloria Abad, a la Ing. Agr. Silvia Wolcan, al Dr R. Dehley y al Ing. Agr. Carlos Carloni por la provisión de valiosas referencias bibliográficas. Al Ing Agr M Sc Pablo Grijalba por acompañarme en la ardua tarea de introducirnos al mundo de los Oomycetes a través de nuestras tesis doctorales y los proyectos de investigación que compartimos, y por sus consejos y colaboración en aspectos biomoleculares. A mis compañeros del Proyecto Ubacyt, Lic.
  • Metalaxyl-M-Resistant Pythium Species in Potato Production Areas of the Pacific Northwest of the U.S.A

    Metalaxyl-M-Resistant Pythium Species in Potato Production Areas of the Pacific Northwest of the U.S.A

    Am. J. Pot Res (2009) 86:315–326 DOI 10.1007/s12230-009-9085-z Metalaxyl-M-Resistant Pythium Species in Potato Production Areas of the Pacific Northwest of the U.S.A. Lyndon D. Porter & Philip B. Hamm & Nicholas L. David & Stacy L. Gieck & Jeffery S. Miller & Babette Gundersen & Debra A. Inglis Published online: 3 April 2009 # Potato Association of America 2009 Abstract Several Pythium species causing leak on potato information is lacking on the distribution of MR isolates in are managed by the systemic fungicide metalaxyl-M. the Pacific Northwest. Soil samples from numerous fields Metalaxyl-M-resistant (MR) isolates of Pythium spp. have (312) cropped to potatoes in Idaho (140), Oregon (59), and been identified in potato production areas of the U.S.A., but Washington (113) were assayed using metalaxyl-M- amended agar for the presence of MR isolates of Pythium in 2004 to 2006. Altogether, 1.4%, 42.4% and 32.7% of the L. D. Porter (*) fields from these states, respectively, were positive for MR Vegetable and Forage Crops Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Pythium. Isolates of Pythium ultimum that were highly 24106 N. Bunn Road, Prosser, WA 99350, USA resistant to metalaxyl were recovered from 53 fields e-mail: [email protected] representing ID, OR, and WA. Greater than 50% of the : Pythium soil population consisted of MR isolates in ten of P. B. Hamm S. L. Gieck 64 fields from Oregon and Washington. Nine species of Department of Botany & Plant Pathology, Hermiston Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Pythium were recovered from soil samples, of which MR P.
  • Illustration Sources

    Illustration Sources

    APPENDIX ONE ILLUSTRATION SOURCES REF. CODE ABR Abrams, L. 1923–1960. Illustrated flora of the Pacific states. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA. ADD Addisonia. 1916–1964. New York Botanical Garden, New York. Reprinted with permission from Addisonia, vol. 18, plate 579, Copyright © 1933, The New York Botanical Garden. ANDAnderson, E. and Woodson, R.E. 1935. The species of Tradescantia indigenous to the United States. Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Reprinted with permission of the Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University. ANN Hollingworth A. 2005. Original illustrations. Published herein by the Botanical Research Institute of Texas, Fort Worth. Artist: Anne Hollingworth. ANO Anonymous. 1821. Medical botany. E. Cox and Sons, London. ARM Annual Rep. Missouri Bot. Gard. 1889–1912. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis. BA1 Bailey, L.H. 1914–1917. The standard cyclopedia of horticulture. The Macmillan Company, New York. BA2 Bailey, L.H. and Bailey, E.Z. 1976. Hortus third: A concise dictionary of plants cultivated in the United States and Canada. Revised and expanded by the staff of the Liberty Hyde Bailey Hortorium. Cornell University. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York. Reprinted with permission from William Crepet and the L.H. Bailey Hortorium. Cornell University. BA3 Bailey, L.H. 1900–1902. Cyclopedia of American horticulture. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York. BB2 Britton, N.L. and Brown, A. 1913. An illustrated flora of the northern United States, Canada and the British posses- sions. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York. BEA Beal, E.O. and Thieret, J.W. 1986. Aquatic and wetland plants of Kentucky. Kentucky Nature Preserves Commission, Frankfort. Reprinted with permission of Kentucky State Nature Preserves Commission.