PDF Download Discipline and Punish: the Birth of the Prison
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
DISCIPLINE AND PUNISH: THE BIRTH OF THE PRISON PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Michel Foucault,Alan Sheridan | 352 pages | 25 Apr 1991 | Penguin Books Ltd | 9780140137224 | English | London, United Kingdom Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison PDF Book I will develop this idea at greater length when I have finished the book. How to read Foucault's discipline and punish. You probably think it sounds like something a paranoid person would say? More by Michel Foucault See more. This fourth volume--which posits that the origins of totalitarian self-surveillance began with the Christian practice of confession--has long been secreted away, in accordance with Foucault's stated wish that there be no posthumous publication of his work. I can reassure you: he is not. I get the feeling that, like me, Mikey also requested a replica panopticon in the form of a cake in honor of his 12th birthday. Journal of Management and Governance, 13 3 , The general thrust is that under the guise of humanism, Europeans decided on punishing the soul rather than the body. Taking pages out of the Philebus of Plato, Foucault loves to talk about the minute parts, exhaustive, continuous, almost infinite divisions and partitions into which his moral continua and the physical continua, like body, as well can be partitioned, divided, apportioned, etc. The instituions use this control of time to develop discipline. Community Reviews. Docile bodies -- The art of distributions -- The control of activity -- The organization of geneses -- The composition of forces -- 2. Mikey's History of Sexuality books are much more closely reasoned, or at least Introduction is and what I've read of Uses of Pleasure. In this book he points out that the word discipline has always had the dual meaning it has today — a discipline as an area of study and discipline as in being forced to behave correctly. Namespaces Article Talk. The problem was that this expression of state power was far too often arbitrary and grossly overwrought. Foucault is best known for his critical studies of social institutions, most notably psychiatry, medicine, the human sciences and the prison system, as well as for his work on the history of human sexuality. Flag as inappropriate. As in the example above, the vengeance of the state seems to know no bounds. Top charts. Foucault suggests this individuality can be implemented in systems that are officially egalitarian , but use discipline to construct non-egalitarian power relations:. The panopticon was the ultimate realization of a modern disciplinary institution. We like to see our world as one on a kind of slow incline towards progress. He looks at the development of highly refined forms of discipline, of discipline concerned with the smallest and most precise aspects of a person's body. He talks about monastic community and how the church condemned some people in the past. C Foucault begins this book by recounting the fate of a man called Damien the regicide, who attempted to assassinate King Louis XV of France in Open Preview See a Problem? In that case, we can't First I have to admit that I was probably provoked to read this because Steven Pinker said it was 'unconvincing' in his particularly unconvincing book 'The Better Angels of our Nature'. But not physically violent repression that's about as far as Pinker and Foucault agree. More precisely put, Foucault presents the utopian ideals of eighteenth-century prison reformers, most of which were never realized, as though they were the actual reforms of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. The principal thrust of the book is to present a view on how the punishment of felon's has evolved in western society from brutal, pain-filled tortures and executions meant to punish the victim for their effrontery to the monarch - stressing a personal offense on the part of the transgressor - to a very systematic and abstract approach meant to remove the convict from society and allow them to be kept under observation. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Harold Bloom rightly complains of Foucault that he tended to forget that the historical ironies he uncovered were just metaphors, and aren't as all- encompassing as his many followers in academe suppose. The theater of public torture gave way to public chain gangs. It will be enough and more than enough. Apr 29, Elie F rated it really liked it Shelves: french , non-fiction , politics-related. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison Writer The fact that the left embraced this book, which was a grand critique of l The first two chapters are interesting, although his defense of public torture is idiotic. That is, discipline must come about without excessive force through careful observation, and molding of the bodies into the correct form through this observation. Three new models of penality helped to overcome resistance to it. I did get some useful and interesting information from this book, and it made me see a few things from a new perspective, but everything I gained was only through toil and slog. Also, about the protestant army and the early hand the church had on the kind of discipline insured at schools, which he join to certain religious values from which discipline stem. Is this not an outright indictment of the social sciences? Ok, that might sound like rubbish — but I think it is a remarkably interesting point. Whether or not its his writing style or an effect of the translation, Discipline and Punish is a dense and at times frustratingly opaque book. Virtually everything is determined by power. As a precise history, I have few quibbles with his reporting, and his theory seems completely vali Having previously been exposed to Foucault through a reader, it was nice to see a book-length context for his meditations on the birth of the prison. And a basic premise of all of this is that prison style mass organization can only work by objectifying the people who are cogs in the machine and is therefore a large scale violation of Kant's categorical imperative that we should always treat other people as ends not means. Michel Foucault. This architectural model, though it was never adopted by architects according to Bentham's exact blueprint, becomes an important conceptualization of power relations for prison reformers of the 19th century, and its general principle is a recurring theme in modern prison construction. Institutions modeled on the panopticon begin to spread throughout society. To Foucault, the panopticon was not just a model for the ideal prison, but also for the ideal hospital, factory and school. He points out that this surveillance has meant turning our lives into texts. No wonder a lot of people in the modern world are alienated and suicidal. Once the power of the state is created, in the form of prisons, courts, police, a strong incentive forms to continue, if not grow, that power. Crime and rebellion are akin to a declaration of war. The next day the arm was cut off, and, since it fell at his feet, he was constantly kicking it up and down the scaffold; on the third day, red-hot pincers were applied to his breasts and the front of his arm; on the fourth day, the pincers were applied similarly on the back of his arm and on his buttocks; and thus, consecutively, this man was tortured for eighteen days. To understand how to be good requires a particular kind of knowledge. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison Reviews A glorious example: "The moment that saw the transition from historico-ritual mechanisms for the formation of individuality to the scientifico- disciplinary mechanisms, when the normal took over from the ancestral, and measurement from status, thus substituting for the individuality of the memorable man that of the calculable man, that moment when the sciences of man became possible is the moment when a new technology of power and a new political anatomy of the body were implemented. But the most surprising thing is that all this ended rather suddenly in the 19th century, which is when the modern prison system was born. That was a surprise part of the book that isn't communicated by discipline, and a part that is VERY relevant to the world we exist in. Some of them are schools, prisons, hospitals or others. It's obvious Foucault was channeling Marx, Rousseau, and de Sade in this book he never talks about de Sade, but it reminded me of de Sade's philosophy. So, I still want to read his sexy books, his book on madness, and his book on the clinic, so I guess that makes this a four-star book. It was a ritual in which the audience was important. Foucault also rejected the poststructuralist and postmodernist labels later attributed to him, preferring to classify his thought as a critical history of modernity rooted in Immanuel Kant. No wonder a lot of people in the modern world are alienated and suicidal. Goodreads Librari It would range from pedagogical institutions from the home and childrearing, to schools and education. He has many more related insights which are developed in an engaging and accessibly written history of the penal system. Foucault argues that prison did not become the principal form of punishment just because of the humanitarian concerns of reformists. But he suggests that the shift towards prison that followed was the result of a new "technology" and ontology for the body being developed in the 18th century, the "technology" of discipline, and the ontology of "man as machine. Discipline and Punish is first of all a history of changing attitudes toward and practices of punishing crime in the late s through mid s.