DOCSLIB.ORG

2016 Community Health Needs Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2016 Community Health Needs Assessment 2016 Community Health Needs Assessment Kaiser Foundation Hospital-South Bay License # 930000079 Approved by KFH Board of Directors September 21, 2016 To provide feedback about this Community Health Needs Assessment, email [email protected] Authors Harder+Company Community Research is a comprehensive social research and planning firm with offices in San Francisco, Davis, San Diego, and Los Angeles, California. Harder+Company’s mission is to help our clients achieve social impact through quality research, strategy, and organizational development services. Since 1986, we have assisted foundations, government agencies, and nonprofits throughout California and the country in using good information to make good decisions for their future. Our success rests on providing services that contribute to positive social impact in the lives of vulnerable people and communities. The following staff contributed to this report: Victoria Perera, Research Associate Courtney Huff, Research Associate Veronica Awan, Research Assistant Shayla Spilker, Research Assistant Loraine Park, Director Harder+Company would like to thank the following entities for their review and feedback to the report: Tara O’Brien, Public Affairs Director, Kaiser Foundation Hospital-South Bay Janae Oliver, Community Benefit Manager, Kaiser Foundation Hospital-South Bay Mehrnaz Davoudi, Community Benefit, Kaiser Permanente, Southern California Jacqueline Rangel, Community Benefit, Kaiser Permanente, Southern California Albertina Lopez, Community Benefit, Kaiser Permanente, Southern California Chris Schweidler, Research Action Design Caroline Rivas, Research Action Design Acknowledgements Conducting useful, relevant and actionable research depends upon the contributions of many stakeholders. This Community Health Needs Assessment (CHNA) would not have been possible without the concerned residents and community leaders who generously provided their time, opinions and resources towards this needs assessment. In particular, we would like to thank those who participated in the focus groups, key stakeholder interviews and prioritization session. Harder+Company and Kaiser Foundation Hospital-South Bay would also like to thank the following community organizations and partners: Angie Benton, City of Long Beach Department of Health and Human Services Cheryl Barrit, City of Long Beach Department of Health and Human Services Pamela Shaw, City of Long Beach Department of Health and Human Services Dr. Elisa Nicholas, The Children’s Clinic “Serving Children and Their Families” Penelope Leon, The Children’s Clinic “Serving Children and Their Families” Kit G. Katz, Dignity Health St. Mary Medical Center Melissa Biel, Community Benefit Consultant, Long Beach MemorialCare System 1 Table of Contents Authors .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................ 1 Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................. 2 I. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................ 4 A. Community Health Needs Assessment (CHNA Background) ..................................................... 4 B. Summary of Prioritized Needs .................................................................................................... 4 C. Summary of Needs Assessment Methodology and Process ....................................................... 5 D. Implementation Strategy Evaluation of Impact............................................................................ 7 II. Introduction/Background .................................................................................................................... 7 A. About Kaiser Permanente (KP) .................................................................................................. 7 B. About Kaiser Permanente Community Benefit............................................................................ 7 C. Purpose of the CHNA Report ..................................................................................................... 8 i. To Advance Community Health ............................................................................................... 8 ii. To Implement ACA Regulations .............................................................................................. 8 D. Kaiser Permanente Approach to CHNA...................................................................................... 8 III. Community Served ........................................................................................................................... 9 A. Kaiser Permanente’s Definition of Community Served ............................................................... 9 B. Map and Description of Community Served ............................................................................... 9 i. Map ......................................................................................................................................... 9 ii. Geographic description of community served (towns, county, and/or zip codes) ................... 10 iii. Demographic profile of community served ............................................................................. 10 IV. Who was Involved in the Assessment............................................................................................. 18 A. Identity of Hospitals that collaborated on the assessment ........................................................ 18 B. Other partner organizations that collaborated on the assessment ............................................ 19 C. Identity and qualification of consultants used to conduct the assessment ................................. 19 V. Process and Methods Used to Conduct the CHNA .......................................................................... 19 A. Secondary Data ....................................................................................................................... 19 i. Sources and dates of secondary data used in the assessment ............................................. 19 ii. Methodology for collection, interpretation and analysis of secondary data ............................. 19 B. Community Input ...................................................................................................................... 21 i. Description of the community input process .......................................................................... 21 ii. Methodology for interpretation and analysis of primary data .................................................. 21 C. Written Comments ................................................................................................................... 22 2 D. Data limitations and information gaps ....................................................................................... 23 VI. Identification and Prioritization of Community Health Needs: Process and Key Findings ................ 23 A. Identifying Community Health Needs ....................................................................................... 23 i. Definition of Health Need ....................................................................................................... 23 ii. Criteria and analytical methods used to identify the community health needs ........................ 23 B. Process and criteria used for prioritization of the health needs ................................................. 24 C. Prioritized description of all the community health needs identified through the CHNA ............. 26 i. Community Health Landscape and Trends ............................................................................ 26 D. Community assets, capacities and resources potentially available to respond to the identified health needs .................................................................................................................................... 31 VII. KFH-South Bay 2013 Implementation Strategy Evaluation of Impact............................................. 33 A. Purpose of 2013 Implementation Strategy evaluation of impact ............................................... 33 B. 2013 Implementation Strategy Evaluation of Impact Overview ................................................. 33 C. 2013 Implementation Strategy Evaluation of Impact by Health Need ....................................... 35 VIII. Appendix ...................................................................................................................................... 52 Appendix A: Secondary Data Sources and Dates ............................................................................ 52 Quantitative Secondary Data Sources .......................................................................................... 52 Other Secondary Data Sources .................................................................................................... 54 Additional Secondary Literature .................................................................................................... 54 Appendix B: Community Input Tracking Form .................................................................................. 58 Appendix C: Health Need Profiles ...................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Port Ships Are Massive L.A. Polluters. Will California Force A
    Port ships are becoming L.A.’s biggest polluters. Will California force a cleanup? In December, a barge at the Port of Los Angeles uses a system, known as a bonnet or “sock on a stack,” that’s intended to scrub exhaust. (Allen J. Schaben / Los Angeles Times) Ships visiting Southern California’s bustling ports are poised to become the region’s larg­ est source of smog­causing pollutants in coming years, one reason state regulators want to reduce emissions from thousands more of them. Air quality officials want to expand the number of ships that, while docked, must either shut down their auxiliary engines and plug into shore power or scrub their exhaust by hooking up to machines known as bonnets or “socks on a stack.” But some neighbors of the ports say the California Air Resources Board is not moving fast enough to cut a rising source of pollution. Some also fear that the shipping industry and the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach will use their clout to weaken the proposed restrictions, which the Air Resources Board will decide on in the first half of the year. “We need relief; it’s just that simple,” said Theral Golden of the West Long Beach Assn., a neighborhood group that has long fought for cleaner air in a community that is among the hardest hit by port pollution. Ruben Garcia, president of Advanced Environmental Group, points out the telescoping tube of an emissions capture system that’s attached to a barge at the Port of L.A. (Allen J.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Preservation Element
    HISTORIC PRESERVATION ELEMENT City of Long Beach, California 2030 General Plan Department of Development Services Planning Bureau, Advance Planning Division 333 West Ocean Boulevard Long Beach, California 90802 http:www.lbds.info/planning/advance_planning/ HISTORIC PRESERVATION ELEMENT Mayor and City Council Bob Foster, Mayor Val Lerch, Vice-Mayor, 9th District Robert Garcia, 1st District Suja Lowenthal, 2nd District Gary DeLong, 3rd District Patrick O’Donnell, 4th District Gerrie Schipske, 5th District Dee Andrews, 6th District Tonia Reyes Uranga, 7th District Rae Gabelich, 8th District Planning Commission Philip Saumur, Chair Melani Smith, Vice-Chair Becky Blair Charles Durnin Alan Fox Leslie Gentile Donita Van Horik Cultural Heritage Commission Laura H. Brasser Shannon Carmack Irma Hernandez Karen L. Highberger Louise Ivers Harvey Keller Richard Powers City Staff Reginald Harrison, Acting Development Services Director Michael J. Mais, Assistant City Attorney Jill Griffiths, Advance Planning Officer Pat Garrow, Project Manager/Senior Planner Derek Burnham, Current Planning Officer and Historic Resources Group Hollywood, CA ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON JUNE 22, 2010 City of Long Beach Historic Preservation Element Long Beach 2030 Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................iii PART ONE: BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT…………………………………..…………1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation 5 Identifying Working Solutions
    Implementation 5 Identifying Working Solutions “When it is obvious that the goals cannot be reached, don’t adjust the goals, adjust the action steps.” Confucius Chinese teacher, editor, politician and philosopher 5 Implementation Identifying Working Solutions • Implementation Overview ......................................................................................125 • Citywide Implementation Strategies .................................................................. 126 » Sustainable Development Patterns and Building Practices ................... 126 » Economic Development and Job Growth .................................................... 127 » Growth and Change ............................................................................................. 128 » Neighborhood Preservation and Enhancement ........................................ 129 » Broad-based Housing Opportunities ............................................................. 130 » Fair and Equitable Land Use Plan .....................................................................130 » Green Industries and Jobs .................................................................................. 131 »Effi cient Energy Resources Management ..................................................... 132 » Reliable Public Facilities and Infrastructure ................................................. 133 » Increased and Diversifi ed Open Space .......................................................... 133 » Natural Resources Restoration and Reconnection ...................................
    [Show full text]
  • City of Long Beach Demographics
    City of Long Beach Demographics GOVERNMENT The City of Long Beach, California covers approximately 52 square miles on the southern City of Long Beach coast of Los Angeles County. With a current Ethnic Diversity population of 491,564, Long Beach is the second largest city in Los Angeles County and Black Asian 14.5% 11.9% the fifth largest city in the state. It is a diverse Other and dynamic city that, based on the 2000 4.7% Census, has the following ethnic breakdown: White 35.8% Hispanic, 33.1% White, 14.5% Black, 33.1% 11.9% Asian, and 4.7% all other ethnicities. Hispanic 35.8% Long Beach was originally incorporated in 1888. After a short period of disincorporation, the City was reincorporated on December 3, 1897. Since 1921, Long Beach has been governed as a charter city, and operates under a Council- Manager form of government. The City Council is made up of nine members, elected by district. The Mayor is chosen in a citywide election to serve as the full-time chief legislative officer of the City. Although the Mayor does not vote, the Mayor presides over City Council meetings, presents the annual budget to the City Council and has veto power over Council actions. The Vice-Mayor is elected by the Council from among its members. The City has three other full-time elected officials: City Attorney, City Auditor and City Prosecutor. The City Council appoints the City Clerk and City Manager. The Mayor nominates and the City Council approves members to various boards and commissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Neighborhood Truck Traffic Background the Community of Wilmington, Carson, West Long Beach Is Home to the Port of Long Beach and Port of Los Angeles (Ports)
    Chapter 5: Actions to Reduce Community Air Pollution Neighborhood Truck Traffic Background The community of Wilmington, Carson, West Long Beach is home to the Port of Long Beach and Port of Los Angeles (Ports). The Ports serve as a gateway for the world’s markets through the movement of goods. These goods are transported to and from the Ports by ships, trains, and heavy-duty trucks. Trucks are not only used to deliver goods directly to and from the Ports, but also to railyards, warehouses, and retail stores. Trucks travel along freeways (e.g., I-710, I-110, I- 405, and I-91) that pass through the Wilmington, Carson and West Long Beach community. Also, trucks often travel near and through local neighborhoods to reach their destinations thus exposing residents to harmful air pollutants. The amount of freeway and neighborhood truck traffic in the Wilmington, Carson, West Long Beach community is likely to increase as a result of the expected increase in goods movement activities in Southern California. These activities are largely driven by the anticipated growth in the volume of goods that are imported and exported through the Ports.1 This growth may lead to additional community air quality impacts resulting from increases in traffic volumes through local neighborhoods and freeway corridors. Community Air Quality Priorities – Idling Trucks, Enhanced Enforcement of Existing Regulations, Air Pollution from High Volume of Trucks and Cleaner Technology Options The Wilmington, Carson, West Long Beach CSC identified air pollution from heavy-duty diesel trucks and passenger cars traveling on local neighborhood streets and freeways as an air quality priority.
    [Show full text]
  • Project & Process Existing Conditions Cultural Needs Assessment Community Livability Plan
    COMMUNITY LivabilityPlan PROJECT & PROCESS EXISTING CONDITIONS CULTURAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT COMMUNITY LIVABILITY PLAN Chapter Two I-710 Corridor Neighborhoods LONG BEACH CALIFORNIA Views of I-710 Corridor public art and identity EXISTING PROJECTS AND CONDITIONS Th e team documented existing projects and conditions within the Community Liv- ability Plan area using a variety of diff erent strategies. Th ese included review of City General Plan documents, other planning documents, conversation with project team members, and analysis of City GIS data. Using information from these sources, a variety of existing conditions maps were developed and disseminated to project team members. Th ese maps include the following: General Plan Land Use Th e City’s General Plan land use designations, shown in Figure 2-1, date back to 1989, and are in the process of being updated as part of the Long Beach 2030 Plan process. Th e land use makeup within the Community Livability Plan area ranges from single-family residential neighborhoods to downtown mixed-use environ- ments. Th e downtown area is generally a high-density mixed-use zone, with pockets of industrial land near the port. To the north of downtown, the Plan area is generally characterized by large tracts of single-family residential with schools and open space embedded in the neighborhoods and commercial uses along major corridors. Existing Land Uses Existing land uses within the Community Livability Plan area, shown in Figure 2-2, are predominantly single-family residential in the northern, central and western por- tions of the plan. Within these areas there are also linear tracts of retail and commer- cial uses along major corridors, such as Long Beach Boulevard.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower La River
    LOWER LA RIVER An Inclusive Approach to Planning, Implementation, and Community Engagement June 2017 1 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Lower Los Angeles River Revitalization: An Inclusive Approach to Planning, Implementation, and Community Engagement A comprehensive project submitted in partial satisfaction for the requirements of the degree Master of Urban and Regional Planning By Delia Arriaga Ana Bonilla Lily Brown Paige Colton Babak Dorji David Fenn Samah Itani Kevin Johnson Johnny Le Alex Linz Jacqueline Martinez Sarah Mercurio Uday Ram Tony Tonnu Julie Wedig Client: Urban Federal Waters Partnership Faculty Chair of Committee: Diana Varat 2017 Disclaimer: This report was prepared in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master in Urban and Regional Planning degree in the Department of Urban Planning at the University of California, Los Angeles. It was prepared at the direction of the Department and of the Urban Federal Waters Partnership as a planning client. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Department, the UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs, UCLA as a whole, or the client. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are sincerely grateful for the guidance of our faculty instructor Diana Varat as well our Special Reader Rebecca Crane for their unending support, feedback, and patience. Thank you for pushing our work to be the very best it could be and for believing in us. We would like to extend our thanks the UCLA Luskin Department of Urban Planning for hosting and sponsoring this Comprehensive Project, as well as the UCLA Institute of Transportation Studies, for their financial support of this project.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Long Beach Historic Context Statement
    City of Long Beach Historic Context Statement Prepared for: City of Long Beach Department of Development Services Office of Historic Preservation 333 West Ocean Boulevard Long Beach, California 90802 Prepared by: Sapphos Environmental, Inc. 430 North Halstead Street Pasadena, California 91107 July 10, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTIONS PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 5 1.1 Objectives and Scope............................................................................................. 5 1.2 Working Definitions............................................................................................... 6 1.3 Report Preparation ................................................................................................. 8 1.4 Historic Context Statement Organization................................................................ 8 2.0 LOCATION...................................................................................................................... 10 3.0 STUDY METHODS.......................................................................................................... 14 3.1 Historical Research............................................................................................... 14 3.2 Previous Surveys................................................................................................... 15 3.3 Field Reconnaissance...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Long Beach Housing Element Health Impact Assessment
    LONG BEACH HOUSING ELEMENT HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT August 1, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 5 WHAT IS A HOUSING ELEMENT? 5 HISTORICAL CONTEXT OF HOUSING IN LONG BEACH 6 HOUSING IN LONG BEACH TODAY 7 II. METHODS 7 BACKGROUND 7 HIA STUDY AREA 7 DATA SOURCES 9 REPORT ORGANIZATION 9 III. EXISTING CONDITIONS 10 DEMOGRAPHICS 10 RACIAL AND ETHNIC DIVERSITY 10 INCOME 11 HOUSEHOLD INCOMES IN LONG BEACH16 12 EDUCATION 14 HOUSING TENURE 15 CURRENT HEALTH CONDITIONS IN LONG BEACH 16 LONG BEACH AND THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 16 A TALE OF TWO CITIES 16 CENTRAL AND WEST LONG BEACH 17 HEALTH AND ETHNICITY IN LONG BEACH 18 HOUSING AFFORDABILITY 20 HOUSING AFFORDABILITY AND HEALTH 20 HOUSING AFFORDABILITY IN LONG BEACH 21 HOUSING COST BURDEN50 21 CAPACITY FOR HOME OWNERSHIP 23 HOMELESSNESS 24 HOUSING DEMAND 24 EMPLOYMENT AND INCOME 26 OVERCROWDING 26 EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES 29 TRUANCY37–39,59 29 SOCIAL SUPPORT AND STRESS 29 HOUSING LOCATION 31 HOUSING LOCATION AND HEALTH 31 PROXIMITY TO HEALTH-PROMOTING RESOURCES 32 PROXIMITY TO UNHEALTHY NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS 33 SOURCES OF POLLUTION 35 NEIGHBORHOOD SEGREGATION 36 HOUSING QUALITY 39 HOUSING QUALITY AND HEALTH 39 AGE OF HOUSING STOCK 40 LANDLORD RESPONSIVENESS TO HOUSING PROBLEMS 42 2 EXPOSURE TO CRIME IN LONG BEACH NEIGHBORHOODS 43 IV. IMPACT ANALYSIS 43 IMPACTS ON HOUSING AFFORDABILITY 43 UNITS OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING 43 DISTRIBUTION OF RESIDENT POPULATIONS IN THE CITY OF LONG BEACH 45 IMPACTS TO HOUSING LOCATION 45 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SITES 45 EMERGENCY SHELTERS 46 IMPACTS TO HOUSING QUALITY 49 HOUSING CODE ENFORCEMENT 49 V.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Health Assessment
    Community Health Assessment City of Long Beach Department of Health and Human Services JULY 2013 City of Long Beach Department of Health and Human Services Bureau Managers Susan Price, MSW, Interim Director & Community Health Bureau Manager Mitchell Kushner, MD, MPH, City Health Officer, Physician Services Bureau S. Michael Johnson, MPA, Support Services Bureau Manager Cheryl Barrit, MPIA, Preventive Health Bureau Manager Nelson Kerr, MPA, Environmental Health Bureau Manager Darnisa Tyler, MPA, Housing Authority Bureau Manager Table of Contents Dear Family, Friends, and Neighbors, Executive Summary ................................................................................................... 1 Long Beach Profile .................................................................................................. 1 Since 1906, the City of Long Beach Department of Health and Human Services (Health Department) has been at the forefront of protecting the health and quality of life of our Health Status ........................................................................................................... 4 community, preventing diseases, and promoting the health of children and families. Public Behavioral Health .................................................................................................... 8 health is the practice of preventing disease and promoting good health within groups of people, from small communities to entire countries. In other words, public health is about protecting and Social Determinants of Health .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Action: Mobile Monitoring to Identify Air Pollution Hotspots and Assess
    Community: Wilmington, Carson, West Long Beach Air Quality Priority: Truck Traffic August 2020 Action: Mobile monitoring to identify air pollution hotspots and assess the impact of truck emissions on community exposure Background & Objective The Wilmington, Carson, West Long Beach (WCWLB) community is intersected by a multitude of public roads and freeways with high traffic volumes and a high fraction of diesel truck traffic due to the presence of the Port of Long Beach and Port of Los Angeles and the associated goods movement. The specific concerns related to truck traffic identified by the community steering committee (CSC) include emissions from idling and moving trucks operated on freeways, major roadways, intersections, local neighborhood streets, and their impact on local residents. The monitoring strategy to study and characterize this air quality priority consists of comprehensive mobile measurements and near-road monitoring for black carbon (BC), particulate matter (PM), ultrafine particles (UFP), nitric oxide (NO), and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). Mobile monitoring is first conducted in areas identified by the CSC with high density of moving and idling trucks within the local neighborhood streets and prioritized based on available truck density information. These measurements will extend to other areas within the WCWLB community to support implementation of emission reduction strategies and track their progress; identify air pollution hotspots; and assess the impact of truck emissions on community exposure. These measurements complement the near-road measurements collected by the South Coast AQMD near the I-710 freeway that provide representative pollutant exposure information for people who live, work, or go to school adjacent to freeways or who spend significant time traveling on some of the busiest roadways in Southern California with a high fraction of diesel truck traffic.
    [Show full text]
  • To Search the Index to the Slides in Series 1
    Historical Society of Long Beach Long Beach Redevelopment Agency Collection 1 4260 Atlantic Ave, Long Beach, CA 90807 Series 1 Slide Inventory www.hslb.org 562/424-2220 Object ID # Box Title General Streets(s) and Address(es) Description/Keywords Dates Slide Photogr- # Area(s) # apher(s) 2017.029.001 1A Bank of America, Pine St. Downtown Banks; Pine Street; BoA 1981 9 /Waterfront 2017.029.002 1A Bradley Building, Pine Ave. & Downtown 201-209 Pine Ave. Birdland; Live Jazz Window 1982- 82 3rd St. /Waterfront 1991 2017.029.003 1A Breakers, Ocean Blvd. Downtown 200-220 E. Ocean Blvd. Hilton; Wilton; Breakers International; Hotels 1983- 2 /Waterfront 1984 2017.029.004 1A California Veterans / State Downtown Veterans Affairs; V.A. Hospital; Construction 1981- 49 Office Building /Waterfront 1982 2017.029.005 1A Chamber of Commerce Downtown 1 World Trade Center #1650 Downtown Long Beach; Buildings; Government 1981- 14 /Waterfront 1982 2017.029.006 1A City Centre Building Downtown 200 Pine Ave. Downtown Long Beach; Buildings; Government 1995- 2 Andy /Waterfront 1996 Witherspo on 2017.029.007 1A - City Hall / Civic Center Downtown 333 Ocean Blvd. Downtown Long Beach; Buildings; Government 1981- 86 Peg 1B /Waterfront 2000 Owens, John Robinson 2017.029.008 1B Convention Center Downtown 300 Ocean Blvd. Long Beach Arena; Terrace Theatre; Aerial; Parking Signage; Convention Center Signage; 1978- 103 John /Waterfront Interior; Trade Show 1997 Robinson, Michele and Tom Grimm, G. Metiver 2017.029.009 1B- Crocker Plaza Downtown 180 E. Ocean Blvd. Construction; Bank 1980- 84 1C /Waterfront 1984 2017.029.010 1C Harbor Bank Building Downtown 11 Golden Shore Ave.
    [Show full text]