DOCSLIB.ORG

Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Complex Epa Id: Wa2170023418 Ou 02 Bremerton, Wa 06/13/2000 Declaration of the Record of Decision Site Name and Address

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Complex Epa Id: Wa2170023418 Ou 02 Bremerton, Wa 06/13/2000 Declaration of the Record of Decision Site Name and Address EPA/ROD/R10-00/516 2000 EPA Superfund Record of Decision: PUGET SOUND NAVAL SHIPYARD COMPLEX EPA ID: WA2170023418 OU 02 BREMERTON, WA 06/13/2000 DECLARATION OF THE RECORD OF DECISION SITE NAME AND ADDRESS Bremerton Naval Complex Operable Unit B Marine Bremerton, Washington STATEMENT OF PURPOSE This decision document presents the final remedial action for the marine portion of Operable Unit (OU) B, one of four operable units at the Bremerton Naval Complex (BNC) Superfund site in Bremerton. Washington. The Complex has been assigned facility identification number WA2170023418. The selected remedy in this decision document was chosen in accordance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response. Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), as amended, and, to the extent practicable, the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP). This decision is based on the Administrative Record for OUB. The U. S. Navy (Navy) is the lead agency for this decision. Both the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) and the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) concur with the selected remedy. ASSESSMENT OF THE SITE The response action selected in this record of decision (ROD) is necessary to protect the public health or welfare or the environment from actual or threatened releases of hazardous substances into the environment. Such a release or threat of release may present an imminent and substantial endangerment to public health, welfare, or the environment. DESCRIPTION OF THE SELECTED REMEDY This ROD addresses the marine environment of CU B, which includes the nearshore portions of Sinclair Inlet that extend east and west along the shorelines of the Bremerton Naval Complex. OU B is one of four operable units (A, B. C, and NSC) at the Bremerton Naval Complex. The terrestrial sites within CU B (Sites 1, 2, 7,8, 9, 10 East, 10 Central, 10 West, and drydocks) are not addressed in this ROD. With the consensus of EPA and Ecology, only the marine portions of CU B and the nearshore environment of Sinclair Inlet are addressed in this ROD. Decision documents for CU A and CU NSC have been completed; decision documents regarding the terrestrial portion of CU B and CU C are being prepared separately. The selected remedy for marine CU B addresses human health risks posed by ingestion of seafood and potential environmental risks posed by contaminated sediments and erosion of fill material into the marine environment. The selected remedy includes the following components: • Approximately 200.000 cubic yards of sediments containing polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) will be dredged from an area of approximately 32 acres in the marine portion of CU B and disposed of in excavated confined aquatic disposal (CAD) cells. The CAD cells will be located on Navy- owned submerged land within the boundaries of the BNC. • A combination of sediment capping and enhanced natural recovery will be used to clean up areas of sediments offshore of the southwestern portion of the Bremerton Naval Complex. The design of the sediment cap will include features for shoreline habitat restoration and will cover approximately 13 acres. • Shoreline areas at Site 1, in the central portion of the Bremerton Naval Complex, will be stabilized to minimize the potential for erosion of contaminated fill material into the marine environment. • Marine tissue and sediments will be monitored to document progress toward and attaiiunent of the cleanup goals. • Land-use restrictions will be implemented by the Navy to maintain the integrity of the CAD cells and the shoreline stabilization measures. Because of source control and changes in operating practices, the Navy, Ecology, and EPA believe there is no immediate threat of recontamination of sediments. This is an early action ROD. Early action is being taken so that sediment dredging and disposal components of the remedy can be coordinated with other dredging being conducted by the Navy in support of navigation needs of the Bremerton Naval Complex. Combining the dredging and disposal operations of the two projects enhances the overall implementability and minimizes the short- term environmental effects of the separate projects. Combining the actions will also significantly accelerate the implementation timeframe of the cleanup. Sediments from the navigational dredging that are unsuitable for open-water disposal and sediments from the cleanup action will be disposed of in the on-site CAD cells. STATUTORY DETERMINATIONS The selected remedy is protective of human health and the environment, is in compliance with federal and state requirements that are legally applicable or relevant and appropriate to the remedial action, and is cost-effective. The remedy utilizes permanent solutions and alternative treatment (or resource recovery) technologies to the maximum extent practicable. However, treatment of the marine sediments was not found to be practicable. There are no principal threat wastes present at marine OUB, as that term is defined in EPA guidance. Because this remedywill result in hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants remaining on site above levels that allow for unlimited use and unrestricted exposure, a statutory review will be conducted within 5 years after initiation of remedial action to ensure that the remedy is protective of human health and the environment. DATA CERTIFICATION CHECKLIST The following information is included in the Decision Summary section ofthis record of decision. Additional information can be found in the Administrative Record file for this site. • Chemicals of concern and their respective concentrations (pages 8-13 through 8-24) • Baseline risk represented by the chemicals of concern (pages 8-20 and 8-21) • Cleanup levels established for chemicals of concern and the basis for these levels (page 9-1) • How source materials constituting principal threats are addressed (page 13-8) • Current and reasonably anticipated future land-use assumptions and current and potential future beneficial uses of groundwater used in the baseline risk assessment and ROD (pages 7-1 through 7-3) • Potential land and groundwater use that will be available at the site as a result of the selected remedy (page 12-l1) • Estimated capital, annual operation and maintenance (O&M), and total present worth costs, discount rate, and the number of years over which the remedy cost estimates are projected (page 12-14) • Key factors that led to selecting the remedy (page 12-1) Signature sheet for the foregoing Bremerton Naval Complex Operable Unit B Marine Record of Decision between the U. S. Navy, the Washington State Department of Ecology, and the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS xv 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1 2.0 SITE NAME, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION 2-1 2.1 LOCATION 2-1 2.2 SITE DESCRIPTION 2-1 3.0 SITE HISTORY 3-1 3.1 BREMERTON NAVAL COMPLEX 3-1 3.2 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS 3-1 4.0 COMMUNITY RELATIONS 4-1 5.0 SCOPEANDROLEOFMAR1NEOUB 5-1 5.1 RELATIONSHIP WITH OTHER OPERABLE UNITS 5-1 5.2 COORDINATION WITH NAVIGATIONAL DREDGING PROJECT 5-1 6.0 SUMMARY OF SITE CHARACTERISTICS 6-1 6.1 PHYSICAL SETTING 6-1 6.1.1 Location 6-1 6.1.2 Shoreline Characteristics and Bathymetry 6-2 6.1.3 Climate 6-2 6.2 CULTURAL RESOURCES 6-2 6.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 6-3 6.3.1 Shellfish and Other Invertebrates 6-3 6.3.2 Marine Finfish 6-3 6.3.3 Pacific Salmon and Sea-Run Trout 6-3 6.3.4 Waterfowl and Raptors 6-6 6.3.5 Marine Mammals 6-6 6.4 ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES 6-7 6.4.1 Chinook Salmon 6-7 6.4.2 Bald Eagles 6-8 6.5 MARINE SURFACE WATER 6-9 6.6 SEDIMENTS AND SEDIMENTATION 6-10 6.7 ADJACENT UPLAND AREAS 6-11 6.8 NATURE AND EXTENT OF CONTAMINATION 6-12 6.8.1 Marine Environment 6-12 6.8.2 Adjacent Upland Areas 6-15 6.9 FATE AND TRANSPORT OF COCS 6-18 7.0 CURRENT AND POTENTIAL FUTURE SITE AND RESOURCE USES 7-1 7.1 SITE USES 7-1 7.2 RESOURCE USES 7-2 7.2.1 Salmon Fisheries 7-2 7.2.2 Other Fisheries 7-2 7.2.3 Shellfisheries 7-3 8.0 SUMMARY OF SITE RISKS 8-1 8.1 HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT 8-1 8.1.1 Identification of Chemicals of Potential Concern 8-1 8.1.2 Exposure Assessment 8-2 8.1.3 Toxicity Assessment 8-4 8.1.4 Human Health Risk Characterization 8-5 8.1.5 Uncertainty Analysis for Human Health Risk Assessment 8-6 8.2 ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT 8-8 8.2.1 Benthic Invertebrates 8-9 8.2.2 Shellfish 8-10 8.2.3 Bottom- Dwelling Fish 8-10 8.2.4 Marine Birds 8-11 8.2.5 Uncertainty Analysis for Ecological Risk Assessment 8-12 9.0 REMEDIAL ACTION OBJECTIVES 9-1 9.1 NEED FOR REMEDIAL ACTION 9-1 9.2 REMEDIAL ACTION OBJECTIVES 9-2 9.3 MINIMUM CLEANUP LEVELS, ACTION LEVELS, AND LONG-TERM CLEANUP GOALS 9-2 9.3.1 Minimum Cleanup Levels (MCULs) 9-3 9.3.2 Action Levels 9-3 9.3.3 Cleanup Goals 9-5 10.0 DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES 10-1 10.1 BASIS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF ALTERNATIVES 10-1 10.1.1 Alternatives Evaluated in the Draft Feasibility Study 10-1 10.1.2 Information Obtained Since the Draft Feasibility Study 10-1 10.1.3 Alternatives Remaining for Consideration 10-6 10.2 ALTERNATIVE SD1—NO ACTION 10-6 10.3 ALTERNATIVE SD2—DREDGING WITH UPLAND LANDFILL DISPOSAL 10-7 10.3.1 Description of Alternative 10-7 10.3.2 Dredging of Sediments 10-7 10.3.3 Dewatering and Transport of Sediments 10-10 10.3.4 Disposal in a RCRA Landfill 10-12 10.3.5 Enhanced Natural Recovery 10-12 10.3.6 In Situ Capping 10-14 10.3.7 Shoreline Stabilization at Site 1 10-14 10.3.8 Monitoring 10-15 10.3.9 Institutional Controls 10-16 10.3.10 Maintenance 10-17 10.3.11 Periodic Reviews 10-17 10.4 ALTERNATIVE SD7— DREDGING WITH EXCAVATED CONFINED AQUATIC
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Operations Director
    Washington OPERATIONS DIRECTOR $122,054 - $164,133 (STARTING WAGE UP TO $134,722) Plus Excellent Benefits Apply by May 16, 2021 (First Review, open until filled) KITSAP TRANSIT , WASHIN GTON ♦ OPERATIONS DIRECTO R WHY APPLY? There is lots to see and do in Bremerton, such as taking a stroll along the Boardwalk, touring the his- Headquartered in the City of toric USS Turner Joy, visiting Harborside Fountain Bremerton, Washington, di- Park and PSNS Memorial Plaza, or spending the rectly across the Puget afternoon browsing through Bremerton's historic Sound from Seattle, Kitsap Arts District and unique shops. Bremerton is a Transit offers the right candi- great place to live and offers quality schools, vast date the opportunity to work recreation, a clean environment, 35 beautiful in a positive and stable work parks, cultural programs, convenient shopping, environment that is confirmed with a staff tenure and excellent medical facilities, such as the state- averaging over 14 years, including the General of-the-art Heart & Vascular Center at Harrison Manager who has been with the Agency for 37 Medical Center. Olympic College in Bremerton years. The region offers affordable, quality living provides advanced technical and 7 baccalaureate in a spectacular water and mountain setting where degrees and enriches the community with many the ferry terminal and Bremerton Transportation educational and community services and a Busi- Center at the foot of downtown leads visitors into a ness Relations Center. growing community of galleries, theaters, shops, restaurants, museums, and cafes. If you want to To the south of Bremerton, the City of Port Or- make a difference in a unique community that of- chard serves as the seat of Kitsap County.
    [Show full text]
  • Mercury in Sediment, Water, and Biota of Sinclair Inlet, Puget Sound, Washington, 1989–2007
    Mercury in Sediment, Water, and Biota of Sinclair Inlet, Puget Sound, Washington, 1989–2007 Open-File Report 2009–1285 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Mercury in Sediment, Water, and Biota of Sinclair Inlet, Puget Sound, Washington, 1989–2007 By Anthony J. Paulson, Morgan E. Keys, and Kelly L. Scholting Open-File Report 2009–1285 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2010 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Paulson, A.J., Keys, M.E., and Scholting, K.L., 2010, Mercury in sediment, water, and biota of Sinclair Inlet, Puget Sound, Washington, 1989–2007: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2009-1285, 220 p. iii Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Kitsap County Watershed Location Map Washington State Seems to Have an Abundance of Water
    KITSAP COUNTY INITIAL BASIN ASSESSMENT October 1997 With the multitudes of lakes, streams, and rivers, Kitsap County Watershed Location Map Washington State seems to have an abundance of water. The demand for water resources, however, has steadily increased each year, while the water supply has stayed the same, or in some cases, appears to have declined. This increased demand for limited water resources has made approving new water uses complex and controversial. To expedite decisions about pending water rights, it is vital to accurately assess the quality and quantity of our surface and ground water. The Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) recognizes that water right decisions must be based on accurate scientific information. Ecology is working with consultants and local governments to conduct special studies called Initial What do we know about the Kitsap County Watershed or Basin Assessments throughout the Basin? State. The assessments describe existing water rights, streamflows, precipitation, geology, hydrology, Kitsap County encompasses almost 400 square miles and water quality, fisheries resources, and land use occupies a peninsula and several islands in Puget Sound. patterns. It is bounded on the east and north by Puget Sound and The assessments evaluate existing data on water which Admiralty Inlet, and on the west by Hood Canal. The will assist Ecology to make decisions about pending County is adjoined by Pierce and Mason Counties on the water right applications. The assessments do not affect south, Jefferson County
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 13 -- Puget Sound, Washington
    514 Puget Sound, Washington Volume 7 WK50/2011 123° 122°30' 18428 SKAGIT BAY STRAIT OF JUAN DE FUCA S A R A T O 18423 G A D A M DUNGENESS BAY I P 18464 R A A L S T S Y A G Port Townsend I E N L E T 18443 SEQUIM BAY 18473 DISCOVERY BAY 48° 48° 18471 D Everett N U O S 18444 N O I S S E S S O P 18458 18446 Y 18477 A 18447 B B L O A B K A Seattle W E D W A S H I N ELLIOTT BAY G 18445 T O L Bremerton Port Orchard N A N 18450 A 18452 C 47° 47° 30' 18449 30' D O O E A H S 18476 T P 18474 A S S A G E T E L N 18453 I E S C COMMENCEMENT BAY A A C R R I N L E Shelton T Tacoma 18457 Puyallup BUDD INLET Olympia 47° 18456 47° General Index of Chart Coverage in Chapter 13 (see catalog for complete coverage) 123° 122°30' WK50/2011 Chapter 13 Puget Sound, Washington 515 Puget Sound, Washington (1) This chapter describes Puget Sound and its nu- (6) Other services offered by the Marine Exchange in- merous inlets, bays, and passages, and the waters of clude a daily newsletter about future marine traffic in Hood Canal, Lake Union, and Lake Washington. Also the Puget Sound area, communication services, and a discussed are the ports of Seattle, Tacoma, Everett, and variety of coordinative and statistical information.
    [Show full text]
  • GIS Inventory Maps of the Watershed
    OP104 Dabob Bay OP307 Quilcene-Snow Poulsbo Port Madison OP305 OP308 Skokomish-Dosewallips y Jefferson Count Kitsap County Hood Canal Silverdale Bainbridge Cedar-Sammamish Island OP303 Dyes Inlet Puget Sound Kitsap OP3 310 OP 304 OP OP304 Duwamish-Green Bremerton OP166 Kitsap County 16 Mason County OP Port Orchard OP160 y t n y 16 u t OP o n u y C t o n p C a u s g o t i n C i K K p a s t i K OP300 Vashon OP106 Island Kennedy-Goldsborough OP302 SPUR 302 OP Pierce County Gorst Creek Watershed Plan City of Bremerton Legend Gorst Creek Watershed / Project Boundary County Boundary Regional Context Map G-1 Water Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) City of Bremerton City of Port Orchard July, 2011 Railroad 0 2.5 State Route Miles ´ Urban Growth Area Waterbody Data Sources: Kitsap County, City of Bremerton, Washington Department of Natural Resources, WRIA 15 Subbasins (Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) Subbasin) Washington Department of Ecology, Washington Department of Transportation, Hood Canal Kitsap Path: K:\gis\1896-CoBremerton\232-1896-096_GorstMasterPlan\MapDocs\11x17Figs\G1_RegionalContext_GorstWS-b.mxd Bremerton Lake Union Unnamed Stream Reservoir 1227082475380 Heins Creek Unnamed Stream 1227399475259 Bremerton West UGA Unnamed1227104475308 Stream Unnamed Stream 1227493475317 Gorst Gorst UGA D Creek Y R W BELFAIR VALLE Sinclair Inlet OP166 OP16 OP16 Twin Lakes Unnamed Stream 1227181475299 Creek Creek Gold Mountain Anderson Golf Club OP3 Bremerton Union River Gorst SKIA UGA Parish Creek Unnamed Stream 1226919475271 SKIA UGA Unnamed Stream 1227026475270
    [Show full text]
  • Surf Smelt Fact Sheet
    WASHINGTON STATE SURF SMELT FACT SHEET NAME: Surf smelt, Hypomesus pretiosus (Girard 1855). GEOGRAPHIC RANGE: Long Beach, California to Chignik Lagoon, Alaska. The Asian subspecies, Hypomesus pretiosus japonicas, occurs in the northwest Pacific Ocean. RELATED SPECIES: Several members of the smelt family, Osmeridae, occur in Washington waters, including eulachon (Columbia River smelt, hooligan) Thaleichthys pacificus, longfin smelt Spirinchus thaleichthys, whitebait smelt Allosmerus elongatus, and night smelt Spirinchus starksi. Unlike the other species, both eulachon and longfin smelt are anadromous, migrating into streams in the winter to spawn. Note: Columbia River smelt (eulachon) are listed as Threatened under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and recreational fishing for this species in Washington waters is limited to years in which the run size is exceptionally large. Be sure to check the recreational fishing regulations (http://wdfw.wa.gov/fishing/regulations/) before attempting to fish for any smelt species. RECOGNITION: Characteristic dark stripe down the middle of the side of the body. Also notable for small mouth with maxillary (upper jaw bone) that does not extend past the midpoint of the pupil of the eye; dorsal fin begins in front of the pelvic fin; pelvic fins short; and small, curved adipose fin. Length up to eight inches. LOCAL DISTRIBUTION: Surf smelt occur abundantly throughout the nearshore marine waters of Washington, from the Columbia River to the Canadian border and into southernmost Puget Sound and Hood Canal. Genetic research suggests that, despite this broad distribution, surf smelt throughout Puget Sound represent a single stock. SPAWN TIMING: Surf smelt populations can generally be divided into summer spawners and fall/winter spawners, though year- round spawning has been documented in the Whidbey Basin, Port Susan, portions of the San Juan Islands, and central Puget Sound (Eagle Harbor and Sinclair Inlet).
    [Show full text]
  • Sinclair Inlet NOAA Chart 18452
    BookletChart™ Sinclair Inlet NOAA Chart 18452 A reduced-scale NOAA nautical chart for small boaters When possible, use the full-size NOAA chart for navigation. Included Area Published by the the Port Washington Narrows entrance. The fixed highway bridge crossing the narrows here has a clearance of 82 feet. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Sinclair Inlet is a naval restricted area. (See 334.1240, chapter 2, for National Ocean Service limits and regulations.) Office of Coast Survey Annapolis is a village on the S shore of Sinclair Inlet directly S of Point Herron. A foot pier extends out to a float which is used by a passenger www.NauticalCharts.NOAA.gov ferry between the village and Bremerton. E of the ferry pier is a public 888-990-NOAA float and launching ramp. The float grounds at low water. The buildings of a veterans’ home on the bluff above the town are prominent. What are Nautical Charts? A flat that bares extends about 0.2 mile from shore in the bight between Annapolis and Port Orchard. Nautical charts are a fundamental tool of marine navigation. They show The town of Port Orchard is on the S shore about 0.5 mile W of water depths, obstructions, buoys, other aids to navigation, and much Annapolis. It has a ferry pier, float landing, and a marina. Passenger ferry more. The information is shown in a way that promotes safe and service is maintained with Bremerton every 15 minutes from 1600 to efficient navigation. Chart carriage is mandatory on the commercial 2400 daily. A marina, protected on the W, N, and E sides by a floating ships that carry America’s commerce.
    [Show full text]
  • Illahee Community Plan
    ILLAHEE COMMUNITY PLAN December 2008 KITSAP COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Illahee State “Illahee State Park is a 75-acre marine camping park with 1,785 feet of saltwater frontage on Port Orchard Bay. "Illahee" means "earth" or "country" in the Indian tradition, and views of Puget Sound from the Illahee beach give the viewer a sense of what that word meant to native people. “ Washington State Parks DEDICATION The Illahee Community Plan is dedicated to those who have preceded us on this piece of earth known as Illahee: • The Suquamish and other Native Americans; • The early settlers; and • Those who respected the natural features of this land. “The human spirit needs places where nature has not been rearranged by the hand of man.” ~Author Unknown To waste, to destroy our natural resources, to skin and exhaust the land instead of using it so as to increase its usefulness, will result in undermining in the days of our children the very prosperity which we ought by right to hand down to them amplified… ~Theodore Roosevelt i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS KITSAP COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Stephen Bauer, District 1 Jan Angel, District 2 Josh Brown, District 3 KITSAP COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTING NORTH KITSAP: Lou Foritano Linda Paralez Thomas E. Nevins REPRESENTING CENTRAL KITSAP: John Hough James Sommerhauser John Taylor REPRESENTING SOUTH KITSAP: Robert Baglio Michael A. Gustavson Fred Depee KITSAP COUNTY, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Larry Keeton, Director Scott Diener, Policy and Planning Manager Policy and Planning Staff
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 1: Gorst Creek Watershed Characterization & Framework Plan
    KITSAP COUNTY CITY OF BREMERTON FIGURE 4. GORST CREEK WATERSHEDVolume CHARACTERIZATION 1: - INTEGRATED RESULTS Gorst Creek Watershed Watershed Boundary UGA Boundary Characterization & Framework Plan City Limits 21 Integrated Results Development City of Bremerton City Council Hearing - December 2013 Development 3A 12 Development 3B Development and Restoration Bremerton Protection West 4 13 UGA Protection and Restoration 2 20 Restoration 2A Restoration 2B 14 15 Restoration 2C Gorst UGA Development Addition Gorst UGA 19 5 7 9 6 1 11 17 3 ULID6 8 Port Orchard UGA SKIA UGA 16 10 City of Port Orchard 18 Date: September 2013 0 0.5 1 Source: Parametrix, Department of Ecology, Department of Fish & Wildlife, BERK Miles This page intentionally blank. VOLUME 1. GORST CREEK WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION & FRAMEWORK PLAN City Council Hearing Draft – Preferred Alternative Part of a three-volume plan for Gorst Volume 1. Gorst Creek Watershed Characterization & Framework Plan (this plan) Volume 2. Gorst Planned Action Environmental Impact Statement (under separate cover) Volume 3. Gorst Subarea Plan (under separate cover) P REPARED FOR : City of Bremerton, lead agency Kitsap County December 2013 C R E D I T S Advisory Committee Patty Lent, Mayor, City of Bremerton Charlotte Garrido, Kitsap County Commissioner Jim McDonald, Bremerton City Council Representative Rob Purser, Suquamish Tribe Representative Greg Jose, Bremerton Planning Commission Representative Linda Rowe, Kitsap County Planning Commissioner Representative Project Partners In addition to City
    [Show full text]
  • 528 Part 334—Danger Zone and Restricted Area Regulations
    Pt. 334 33 CFR Ch. II (7–1–12 Edition) (2) For in-lieu fee project sites, real land bank) must be consistent with the estate instruments, management plans, terms of this part. or other long-term protection mecha- (2) In-lieu fee program instruments. All nisms used for site protection must be in-lieu fee program instruments ap- finalized before advance credits can be- proved on or after July 9, 2008 must come released credits. meet the requirements of this part. In- (u) Long-term management. (1) The lieu fee programs operating under in- legal mechanisms and the party re- struments approved prior to July 9, sponsible for the long-term manage- 2008 may continue to operate under ment and the protection of the mitiga- those instruments for two years after tion bank site must be documented in the effective date of this rule, after the instrument or, in the case of um- which time they must meet the re- brella mitigation banking instruments quirements of this part, unless the dis- and in-lieu fee programs, the approved trict engineer determines that cir- mitigation plans. The responsible party cumstances warrant an extension of up should make adequate provisions for to three additional years. The district the operation, maintenance, and long- engineer must consult with the IRT be- term management of the compensatory fore approving such extensions. Any re- mitigation project site. The long-term visions made to the in-lieu fee program management plan should include a de- instrument on or after July 9, 2008 scription of long-term management must be consistent with the terms of needs and identify the funding mecha- this part.
    [Show full text]
  • Sources and Sinks of Filtered Total Mercury and Concentrations Of
    Prepared in cooperation with the Department of the Navy Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Northwest Sources and Sinks of Filtered Total Mercury and Concentrations of Total Mercury of Solids and of Filtered Methylmercury, Sinclair Inlet, Kitsap County, Washington, 2007–10 Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5223 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Sources and Sinks of Filtered Total Mercury and Concentrations of Total Mercury of Solids and of Filtered Methylmercury, Sinclair Inlet, Kitsap County, Washington, 2007–10 By Anthony J. Paulson, Richard S. Dinicola, Marlene A. Noble, Richard J. Wagner, Raegan L. Huffman, Patrick W. Moran, and John F. DeWild Prepared in cooperation with Department of the Navy Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Northwest Scientific Investigations Report 2012-5223 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Port Orchard, APPROVED by the Mayor and Attested by the Clerk in Authentication of Such Passage This 14Th Day of June 2016
    Ordinance No. 014-16 Page 5 of 228 PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Orchard, APPROVED by the Mayor and attested by the Clerk in authentication of such passage this 14th day of June 2016. Robert Putaansuu, Mayor ATTEST: ''Brandy Rinearson, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sponsored by: ron Cates, City Attorney B^ek Ashby, Councilmember PUBLISHED: June 24th, 2016 EFFECTIVE DATE: June 29th, 2016 j-x »;o -/-» " o - o ~ r* \u •% ° ° -;* City of Port Orchard 2016 Update to the Comprehensive Plan FINAL June 14, 2016 WWW.CITYOFPORTORCHARD.US Acknowledgements ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS MAYOR Rob Putaansuu FORMER MAYOR Tim Matthes CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS 2014-2016 Bek Ashby Jeff Cartwright Fred Chang Jerry Childs John Clauson Shawn Cucciardi Scott Diener Clancy Donlin Cindy Lucarelli Rob Putaansuu PLANNING COMMISSION 2014-2016 Robert Baglio Stephanie Bailey Dee Coppola Tadina Crouch Tim Drury Marcus Lane Gil Michael Annette Stewart Trish Tierney Mark Trenary Nick Whittleton Kathleen Wilson DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Nick Bond, Director Stephanie Andrews, Associate Planner Scott Bonjukian, Planning Intern Elle Davis, Associate Planner Keri Sallee, Associate Planner DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Mark Dorsey, Director Andrea Archer-Parsons, Zackary Holt, Stormwater T hom as Hunter, Asst. City Engineer Program Assistant City Foreman UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DESIGN AND PLANNING Rick Sepler, Affiliate Instructor and 2014 Master’s Studio Project Students Page - i Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Final: June 2016 Table of Contents Table of Contents Chapter 1. Introduction .........................................Pg 1-1 1.1. Introduction ..................................................................................... pg 1-1 1.2. 2036 Targeted Outcomes ............................................................ pg 1-3 1.3.
    [Show full text]