Sustaining Peace in Burkina Faso: Responding to an Emerging Crisis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sustaining Peace in Burkina Faso: Responding to an Emerging Crisis MAY 2020 Sustaining Peace in Burkina Faso: Responding to an Emerging Crisis CHRISTIAN LARA AND GABRIEL DELSOL Cover Photo: Joint UN mission to ABOUT THE AUTHORS evaluate the security and humanitarian situation in the Sahel region of Burkina CHRISTIAN LARA is a Rethinking Diplomacy fellow at the Faso, 2017. UN Burkina Faso. Duke University Center for International and Global Studies and former Team Leader of the Relief, Reintegration, and Disclaimer: The views expressed in this Protection Section at the United Nations Mission in South paper represent those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Sudan (UNMISS). International Peace Institute. IPI GABRIEL DELSOL is a consultant and former research welcomes consideration of a wide range of perspectives in the pursuit of intern at the International Peace Institute. a well-informed debate on critical policies and issues in international affairs. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS IPI Publications IPI owes a debt of gratitude to its many donors for their Adam Lupel, Vice President generous support. IPI is particularly grateful to the govern- Albert Trithart, Editor ment of the UK for funding this research initiative. The Meredith Harris, Editorial Intern authors would like to thank the many UN officials, member- state representatives, representatives of civil society Suggested Citation: organizations, and experts who shared their insights and Christian Lara and Gabriel Delsol, perspectives during interviews conducted in “Sustaining Peace in Burkina Faso: Ouagadougou, Dakar, Geneva, and New York. The authors Responding to an Emerging Crisis,” are grateful to the individuals who provided invaluable International Peace Institute, May 2020. feedback on earlier drafts of this report. The authors appreciate the dedicated efforts of Albert Trithart and © by International Peace Institute, 2020 Meredith Harris during the revision phases, as well as the All Rights Reserved support of Thong Nguyen on data visualization and of Boris Bonego during the field visit to Burkina Faso. www.ipinst.org CONTENTS Abbreviations . iii Executive Summary . v Introduction. 1 Challenges and Opportunities for Sustaining Peace in Burkina Faso. 1 What is Sustaining Peace? . 5 Operational and Policy Coherence: Sustaining Peace and the UN Country Team . 6 Analysis and Strategic Planning: The Common Country Analysis and Cooperation Framework. 6 A Strengthened RCO and Coordination Mechanism at UN Headquarters . 7 Decentralizing the UN Presence to Address Vulnerability and Exclusion. 8 Leadership . 9 Role of National, Local, and Regional Partners . 11 Working with the Government . 11 Partnerships with Civil Society Organizations . 12 Regional Initiatives: AU, ECOWAS, and UNOWAS . 12 International Support: Coherent Frameworks for International Cooperation . 14 Added Value of the UN Peacebuilding Fund . 14 Coordinating International Support through the Peacebuilding Commission . 14 International Support to the Broader Sahel Region . 15 Conclusions. 16 Finalizing the Development System Reform Process . 16 Promoting Local Ownership of National Strategies . 16 Aligning Regional and Subregional Funding Streams . 17 Maintaining Political Engagement at UN Headquarters . 17 ABBREVIATIONS CCA Common country analysis CSO Civil society organization DPPA Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs ECOWAS Economic Community of West African States IDP Internally displaced person MAP Matrice d’actions prioritaires NWOW New Way of Working OHCHR Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights PBC Peacebuilding Commission PBF Peacebuilding Fund PIP Priority Investment Programme PNDES Plan national de développement économique et social PPBA Prevention and Peacebuilding Assessment PUS-BF Programme d’urgence pour le Sahel au Burkina Faso RC Resident coordinator RCO Resident coordinator’s office SRSG Special representative of the secretary-general UNCT UN country team UNDP UN Development Programme UNISS UN Integrated Strategy for the Sahel UNOWAS UN Office for West Africa and the Sahel Executive Summary In his January 2018 report on peacebuilding and beyond the leadership level, and the resident sustaining peace, the UN secretary-general called coordinator’s office needs to be fully staffed for its for a shift not only in UN policies on peacebuilding efforts to be sustainable. but also in approaches to peacebuilding at the regional and country levels. In implementing this In terms of leadership, the resident coordinator’s shift, he advocated for changes across four issue office shows the potential to collaborate closely areas: operational and policy coherence; UN with the government while holding it accountable leadership at the country level; partnerships with for human rights violations and to adopt an local and regional actors; and international support expanded role in coordinating the humanitarian for sustaining peace. This was followed one year response. In terms of partnerships, the country later by the reform of the UN development system, team benefits from a strong relationship with the which empowered UN resident coordinators to be government that is focused on national and the heads of the UN country teams and to support subnational development strategies while finding the implementation of sustaining peace. opportunities to support civil society. The UN Office for West Africa and the Sahel plays a partic- In Burkina Faso, these changes come at a time of ularly important role in coordinating efforts increasing instability, with unprecedented humani- between regional organizations and the UN system. tarian and security crises and diminishing trust in Finally, in terms of international support, the rapid the government. Recognizing the growing risks, the increase in engagement by the Peacebuilding UN, the Burkinabe government, and their partners Commission and Peacebuilding Fund has provided began recalibrating their efforts in the country in the UN country team with much-needed political 2018 by developing new strategies and tools to and financial support, although the coordination of address these multidimensional challenges. This financing and programming among the growing ongoing recalibration, together with the changes number of regional development initiatives resulting from the UN development system remains a challenge. reforms, make this an opportune moment to assess the implementation of the secretary-general’s Continued support for the resident coordinator’s recommendations on peacebuilding and sustaining office in Burkina Faso is necessary to ensure that peace in Burkina Faso. the UN’s sustaining peace efforts in the country are part of a holistic approach to the crisis, together Implementation can be assessed across the four with local, national, and regional partners. This shifts called for by the secretary-general. In terms report recommends that the United Nations of operational and policy coherence, the UN finalize the development system reform process in development system reform has given the resident Burkina Faso by fully staffing the resident coordi- coordinator’s office more authority and capacity to nator’s office; continue promoting local ownership lead the country team’s efforts on sustaining peace of the country’s national strategies; better align the and ensure that new strategy and planning growing number of regional and subregional documents align with government efforts. The funding streams; and maintain engagement on rollout of five integrated hubs has also helped tailor Burkina Faso at UN headquarters, particularly these strategies to subnational contexts. However, through the Peacebuilding Commission. greater interagency coordination is required Sustaining Peace in Burkina Faso: Responding to an Emerging Crisis 1 Introduction operational and policy coherence, leadership at the UN country level, partnerships with local and The UN launched a system-wide effort to support regional actors, and international support for 1 the implementation of the sustaining peace agenda sustaining peace. In doing so, it seeks to assess the in Burkina Faso in February 2017 to help the extent to which the UN system contributes to government navigate the country’s 2014 political sustaining peace in the long term while also transition and address humanitarian and develop- effectively coordinating urgent short-term mental challenges. However, a rapidly deterio- responses such as life-saving humanitarian rating security situation and imminent humani- assistance. tarian crisis forced the UN to recalibrate this effort. The paper is based on primary and secondary In February 2019, the special representative of the research. Between September 2019 and March secretary-general (SRSG) of the UN Office for West 2020, forty-six interviews were conducted with UN Africa and the Sahel (UNOWAS), Mohamed Ibn staff, member-state representatives, academics, Chambas, was dispatched to assess the implemen- officials from the Burkinabe government, and tation of the peacebuilding framework in the representatives of civil society in New York, country. He recommended significant changes, Geneva, Dakar, and Ouagadougou. including strengthening the resident coordinator’s office (RCO), assessing the UN country team’s The research is part of a larger IPI project on the (UNCT) capacity to respond to the growing operationalization of the secretary-general’s humanitarian and security crises, and scaling up recommendations on peacebuilding and sustaining UN engagement on the priority areas identified by peace at the country level. Burkina Faso is the
Recommended publications
  • Côte D'ivoire
    CÔTE D’IVOIRE COI Compilation August 2017 United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Regional Representation for West Africa - RSD Unit UNHCR Côte d’Ivoire UNHCR Regional Representation for West Africa - RSD Unit UNHCR Côte d’Ivoire Côte d’Ivoire COI Compilation August 2017 This report collates country of origin information (COI) on Côte d’Ivoire up to 15 August 2017 on issues of relevance in refugee status determination for Ivorian nationals. The report is based on publicly available information, studies and commentaries. It is illustrative, but is neither exhaustive of information available in the public domain nor intended to be a general report on human-rights conditions. The report is not conclusive as to the merits of any individual refugee claim. All sources are cited and fully referenced. Users should refer to the full text of documents cited and assess the credibility, relevance and timeliness of source material with reference to the specific research concerns arising from individual applications. UNHCR Regional Representation for West Africa Immeuble FAALO Almadies, Route du King Fahd Palace Dakar, Senegal - BP 3125 Phone: +221 33 867 62 07 Kora.unhcr.org - www.unhcr.org Table of Contents List of Abbreviations .............................................................................................................. 4 1 General Information ....................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Historical background ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Region: West Africa (14 Countries) (Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Chad, Côte D’Ivoire, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea Bissau, Mali, Niger, Senegal, Togo)
    Region: West Africa (14 Countries) (Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Chad, Côte d’Ivoire, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea Bissau, Mali, Niger, Senegal, Togo) Project title: Emergency assistance for early detection and prevention of avian influenza in Western Africa Project number: TCP/RAF/3016 (E) Starting date: November 2005 Completion date: April 2007 Government counterpart Ministries of Agriculture responsible for project execution: FAO contribution: US$ 400 000 Signed: ..................................... Signed: ........................................ (on behalf of Government) Jacques Diouf Director-General (on behalf of FAO) Date of signature: ..................... Date of signature: ........................ I. BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION In line with the FAO/World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) Global Strategy for the Progressive Control of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI), this project has been developed to provide support to the regional grouping of West African countries to strengthen emergency preparedness against the eventuality of HPAI being introduced into this currently free area. There is growing evidence that the avian influenza, which has been responsible for serious disease outbreaks in poultry and humans in several Asian countries since 2003, is spread through a number of sources, including poor biosecurity at poultry farms, movement of poultry and poultry products and live market trade, illegal and legal trade in wild birds. Although unproven, it is also suspected that the virus could possibly be carried over long distances along the migratory bird flyways to regions previously unaffected (Table 1) is a cause of serious concern for the region. Avian influenza subtype H5N1 could be transported along these routes to densely populated areas in the South Asian Subcontinent and to the Middle East, Africa and Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • African Development Bank Group Burkina Faso Desert to Power
    AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK GROUP BURKINA FASO DESERT TO POWER” INITIATIVE - YELEEN RURAL ELECTRIFICATION PROJECT Public Disclosure AuthorizedPublic Disclosure RDGW/PERN/COBF/PGCL DEPARTMENTS December 2018 Translated Document Public Disclosure AuthorizedPublic TABLE OF CONTENTS I. STRATEGIC THRUST AND RATIONALE ............................................................................. 1 1.1. Project Linkages to Country Strategy and Objectives................................................................. 1 1.2. Rationale for Bank’s Involvement ............................................................................................... 2 1.3. Aid Coordination ......................................................................................................................... 3 II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................................... 4 2.1. Project Description and Components ......................................................................................... 4 2.2. Technical Solution Adopted and Alternatives Explored .............................................................. 5 2.3. Project Type ................................................................................................................................ 5 2.4. Project Cost and Financing Mechanisms .................................................................................... 6 2.5. Project Area and Beneficiaries ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Burkina Faso Burkina
    Burkina Faso Burkina Faso Burkina Faso Public Disclosure Authorized Poverty, Vulnerability, and Income Source Poverty, Vulnerability, and Income Source Vulnerability, Poverty, June 2016 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized 16130_Burkina_Faso_Report_CVR.indd 3 7/14/17 12:49 PM Burkina Faso Poverty, Vulnerability, and Income Source June 2016 Poverty Global Practice Africa Region Report No. 115122 Document of the World Bank For Official Use Only 16130_Burkina_Faso_Report.indd 1 7/14/17 12:05 PM © 2017 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank with external contributions. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorse- ment or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this work is subject to copyright. Because The World Bank encourages dissemination of its knowledge, this work may be reproduced, in whole or in part, for noncommercial purposes as long as full attribution to this work is given. Any queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to World Bank Publications, The World Bank Group, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA; fax: 202-522-2625; e-mail: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • First Camera Survey in Burkina Faso and Niger Reveals Human Pressures on Mammal Communities Within the Largest Protected Area Complex in West Africa
    Received: 11 April 2019 Revised: 21 June 2019 Accepted: 9 July 2019 DOI: 10.1111/conl.12667 LETTER First camera survey in Burkina Faso and Niger reveals human pressures on mammal communities within the largest protected area complex in West Africa Nyeema C. Harris1 Kirby L. Mills1,2 Yahou Harissou3 Emmanuel M. Hema4,5 Isaac T. Gnoumou6 Jenna VanZoeren1 Yayé I. Abdel-Nasser3 Benoit Doamba6 1 Applied Wildlife Ecology Lab, Ecology and Abstract Evolutionary Biology Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan The dearth of ecological data from protected areas at relevant scales challenges con- 2School for Environment and Sustainability, servation practice in West Africa. We conducted the first camera survey for Burkina University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Faso and Niger to elucidate interactions between resource users and mammals in the Michigan largest protected area complex in West Africa (W-Arly-Pendjari, WAP). We differ- 3Parc W-Niger, Direction Générale Des Eaux et Forêts, Ministère de l’Environnement de la entiated direct (e.g., poaching) and indirect (e.g., domestic animals) human activi- Salubrité Urbaine et du Développement ties to determine their effects on species richness, composition, and behavior. Live- Durable Niamey, Niger stock was the dominant human pressure while gathering was the most prevalent direct 4UFR/Sciences Appliquées et human activity. Human pressure did not influence species richness or composition, but Technologiques, Université de Dédougou, Dédougou, Burkina Faso reduced mammal activity with greater consequences from indirect activities. We also 5Laboratoire de Biologie et Ecologie found distinct differences among guilds in their behavioral responses to human pres- Animales, Université Ouaga I Professeur sures as wild ungulates exhibited the greatest sensitivities to livestock presence.
    [Show full text]
  • Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger
    BURKINA FASO, MALI AND NIGER Vulnerability to COVID-19 Containment Measures Thematic report – April 2020 Any questions? Please contact us at [email protected] ACAPS Thematic report: COVID-19 in the Sahel About this report is a ‘bridge’ between North Africa and Sub-Saharan Africa. It is an area of interaction between African indigenous cultures, nomadic cultures, and Arab and Islamic cultures Methodology and overall objective (The Conversation 28/02/2020). ACAPS is focusing on Burkina Faso, Mali, and Niger because these three countries This report highlights the potential impact of COVID-19 containment measures in three constitute a sensitive geographical area. The escalation of conflict in Mali in 2015 countries in the Sahel region: Burkina Faso, Mali, and Niger. It is based on ACAPS’ global exacerbated regional instability as conflict began to spill across the borders. In 2018 ‘Vulnerability to containment measures’ analysis that highlights how eight key factors can regional insecurity increased exponentially as the conflict intensified in both Niger and shape the impact of COVID-19 containment measures. Additional factors relevant to the Burkina Faso. This led to a rapid deterioration of humanitarian conditions (OCHA Sahel region have also been included in this report. The premise of this regional analysis 24/02/2020). Over the past two years armed groups’ activities intensified significantly in the is that, given these key factors, the three countries are particularly vulnerable to COVID- border area shared by the three countries, known as Liptako Gourma. As a result of 19 containment measures. conflict, the provision of essential services including health, education, and sanitation has This risk analysis does not forecast the spread of COVID-19.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Sahel Situation July - December 2019
    REGIONAL SITUATION UPDATE Central Sahel Situation July - December 2019 The Central Sahel countries of Burkina Faso, Mali, and Niger continue to be confronted with multifaceted crises. Weak governance, violent extremism, severe climate change, food insecurity, rapid demographic growth and large-scale forced displacement intersect and transcend borders, deepening the region’s vulnerability to shocks and creating spillovers into neighbouring countries. Despite the presence of thousands of troops from affected countries, supported by the United Nations Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in Mali (the MINUSMA), France and other international contingents, the security situation deteriorated further during the second half of 2019. Rising numbers of incidents and forced displacements have been observed, especially in the Liptako- Gourma area, where the three countries share common borders. As a result of the deteriorating security situation, UNHCR and its partners must contend with a shrinking humanitarian space in the face of declining access to populations at risk. Exploiting these underlying fragility factors, armed groups have sustained their attacks against civilian targets, such as schools and health centres, as well as state institutions and security forces. As insecurity continues to spread throughout Burkina Faso reaching its southern border, neighboring areas in Côte d’Ivoire, Togo, Ghana and Benin run the risk of being destabilized. KEY STATISTICS (AS OF 31 DECEMBER 2019) MAIN HIGHLIGHTS ▪ The continuous deterioration of the security situation 1,007,258 REFUGEES & IDPS and scale-up of military operations in Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger drastically limits humanitarian access and 164,952 refugees in Central Sahel assistance in the most affected areas. With over 4,000 deaths reported, 2019 saw the highest annual death toll due Including in 25,442 in Burkina Faso, 24,797 in Mali, 56,662 to armed conflict in the region since the beginning of the in Mauritania and 58,051 in western Niger (in Tillabery and conflict in Mali in 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Project No. DSH-4000000964 Final Narrative Report
    Border Security and Management in the Sahel - Phase II Project No. DSH-4000000964 Final Narrative Report In Fafa (Gao Region, Mali), a group of young girls take part in a recreational activity as a prelude to an awareness-raising session on the risks associated with the presence of small arms and light weapons in the community (March 2019) Funded by 1 PROJECT INFORMATION Name of Organization: Danish Refugee Council – Danish Demining Group (DRC-DDG) Project Title: Border Security and Management in the Sahel – Phase II Grant Agreement #: DSH-4000000964 Amount of funding allocated: EUR 1 600 000 Project Duration: 01/12/2017 – 30/09/2019 Countries: Burkina Faso, Mali, Niger Sites/Locations: Burkina Faso: Ariel, Nassoumbou, Markoye, Tokabangou, Thiou, Nassoumbou, Ouahigouya Mali: Fafa, Labbezanga, Kiri, Bih, Bargou Niger: Koutougou, Kongokiré, Amarsingue, Dolbel, Wanzarbe Number of beneficiaries: 17 711 beneficiaries Sustainable Development Goal: Goal 16: Peace, justice and strong institutions Date of final report 30/01/2020 Reporting Period: 01/12/2017 – 30/09/2019 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Border Security and Management Programme was launched in 2014 by the Danish Demining Group’s (DDG). Designed to improve border management and security in the Liptako Gourma region (border area shared by Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger), the programme applies an innovative and community-based cross-border approach in the interests of the communities living in the border zones, with the aim of strengthening the resilience of those communities to conflict and
    [Show full text]
  • Central Sahel Advocacy Brief
    Central Sahel Advocacy Brief January 2020 UNICEF January 2020 Central Sahel Advocacy Brief A Children under attack The surge in armed violence across Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger is having a devastating impact on children’s survival, education, protection and development. The Sahel, a region of immense potential, has long been one of the most vulnerable regions in Africa, home to some countries with the lowest development indicators globally. © UNICEF/Juan Haro Cover image: © UNICEF/Vincent Tremeau The sharp increase in armed attacks on communities, schools, health centers and other public institutions and infrastructures is at unprecedented levels. Violence is disrupting livelihoods and access to social services including education and health care. Insecurity is worsening chronic vulnerabilities including high levels of malnutrition, poor access to clean water and sanitation facilities. As of November 2019, 1.2 million people are displaced, of whom more than half are children.1 This represents a two-fold increase in people displaced by insecurity and armed conflict in the Central Sahel countries in the past 12 months, and a five-fold increase in Burkina Faso alone.* Reaching those in need is increasingly challenging. During the past year, the rise in insecurity, violence and military operations has hindered access by humanitarian actors to conflict-affected populations. The United Nations Integrated Strategy for the Sahel (UNISS) continues to spur inter-agency cooperation. UNISS serves as the regional platform to galvanize multi-country and cross-border efforts to link development, humanitarian and peace programming (triple nexus). Partners are invited to engage with the UNISS platform to scale-up action for resilience, governance and security.
    [Show full text]
  • Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso/Republic of Mali)
    COUR INTERNATIONALE DE JUSTICE RECUEIL DES ARRÊTS, AVIS CONSULTATIFS ET ORDONNANCES AFFAIRE DU DIFFÉREND FRONTALIER (BURKINA FASOIRÉPUBLIQUE DU MALI) INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE REPORTS OF JUDGMENTS, ADVISORY OPINIONS AND ORDERS CASE CONCERNING THE FRONTIER DISPUTE (BURKINA FASO/REPUBLIC OF MALI) JUDGMENT OF 22 DECEMBER 1986 Mode officiel de citation : Diffërend frontalier, arrêt, C.I.J. Recueil 1986, p. 554. Official citation : Frontier Dispute, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1986, p. 554. No de vente : 525 1 Sales number DIFFÉREND FRONTALIER (BURKINA FASO/RÉPUBLIQUE DU MALI) FRONTIER DISPUTE (BURKINA FASO/REPUBLIC OF MALI) 22 DECEMBER 1986 JUDGMENT INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE 1986 YEAR 1986 22 December General List No. 69 22 December 1986 CASE CONCERNING THE FRONTIER DISPUTE I (BURKINA FASO/REPUBLIC OF MALI) Frontier dispute - Frontiers inherited from the colonialperiod - Applicable law - Principle of uti possidetisjuris - Nature andscope of theprinciple - Critical date - Place of colonial law (French droit d'outre-mer) - Role of equity infra legem - Form of equity which would constitute a method of interpretation of the law. Conducr of a Party - Argument from acquiescence - Unilateral art of one government -- Intention to become bound- Interpretation of the act in the light of al1 the factual circumstances and of thepossibility of becoming bound by other means - Acceptance of the application to the dispute of certain principles and rules - Rules expressiy recognized by the contesting States. Interests of a third State - Frontier ending in a tripoint - Judicial competence and exercise of the judicial junction - Distinction between the determination of a land boundary and the identification of the rules applicable to the delimitation of the continental sheif - Duty of the Chamber to rule upon the whole of the petitum.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sahel and West Africa Club
    2011 – 2012 WORK PRIORITIES GOVERNANCE THE CLUB AT A GLANCE SAHEL AND WEST AFRICA Club he Strategy and Policy Group (SPG) brings together Club Members twice a year Secretariat 1973. Extreme drought in the Sahel; creation of the “Permanent Inter-State Committee for Drought Food security: West African Futures Tto defi ne the Club’s work priorities and approve the programme of work and Control in the Sahel” (CILSS). The Club’s work focuses on settlement trends and market dynamics, analysing how budget as well as activity and fi nancial reports. Members also ensure the Club’s these two factors impact agricultural activities and food security conditions in smooth functioning through their fi nancial contributions (minimum contribution 1976. Creation of the “Club du Sahel” at the initiative of CILSS and some OECD member countries aiming West Africa. Building on a literature review and analyses of existing information, agreed upon by consensus) and designate the Club President. The position is at mobilising the international community in support of the Sahel. it questions the coherence of data currently used for policy and strategy design. It currently held by Mr. François-Xavier de Donnea, Belgian Minister of State. Under Secrétariat du also highlights the diffi culty of cross-country comparisons, which explains why the management structure of the OECD Secretariat for Global Relations, the SWAC THE SAHEL 1984. Another devastating drought; creation of the “Food Crisis Prevention Network” (RPCA) at the DU SAHEL ET DE it is almost impossible to construct a precise description of regional food security Secretariat is in charge of implementing the work programme.
    [Show full text]
  • Burkina Faso at a Glance
    BURKINA FASO AT A GLANCE POPULATION: 20,393,230 (July 2019 est.) LANGUAGES: French, local languages PREDOMINANT RELIGIONS: Islam, Roman Catholicism TIME ZONE: Four hours ahead of Eastern Daylight Time (New York City) TELEPHONE CODE: 226, country code Burkina Faso is, without a doubt, one of the most beautiful countries in West Africa and a great place to experience African culture. A vibrant center of music and the arts, Burkina Faso hosts several internationally known events, including an annual jazz festival and the bi-annual Pan-African Film Festival. The pressing needs for nutrition and medical attention are met. bi-annual International Arts and Handicrafts Trade Show, the Children also receive tutoring to help with their academics. largest on the continent, attracts hundreds of artisans and Health and hygiene lessons teach them to care for their own more than 100,000 visitors from around the world to the capital physical well-being, and positive social skills are modeled and city of Ouagadougou. encouraged. An impoverished, landlocked country, Burkina Faso also CURRENCY experiences many challenges, including high population The local currency is the CFA Franc (XOF), used throughout density, recurring drought, chronic food insecurity and limited French West Africa. Burkina Faso society operates natural resources. Yet, despite the obstacles they face, the predominantly with cash. Money can be changed at major banks Burkinabé are a resilient people who always have a warm smile in the big cities, but you may have problems changing anything and a warm welcome for visitors. other than euros in smaller towns. ATMs do not always accept foreign cards.
    [Show full text]