Dr. Leonard L. Heston, M.D
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
VOLUME 12 FALL 2010 PART 1 RUTGERS JOURNAL OF LAW & RELIGION -NUREMBURG PROJECT- COMMENTS ON: “ANALYSIS OF THE PERSONALITY OF ADOLPH HITLER: WITH PREDICTIONS OF HIS FUTURE BEHAVIOR AND SUGGESTIONS FOR DEALING WITH HIM NOW AND AFTER GERMANY’S SURRENDER” WRITTEN BY HENRY A. MURRAY, M.D., AND ON AN ADDITIONAL CHAPTER “HITLER THE MAN—NOTES FOR A CASE HISTORY” WRITTEN BY W.H.D. VERNON (DR. MURRAY’S STUDENT) * Leonard L. Heston, M.D. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Background............................................................................................................ 121 II. Military Service..................................................................................................... 122 III. Analytic Tools and Methods.................................................................................. 123 IV. The Holocaust........................................................................................................ 124 V. Political Success.....................................................................................................125 VI. Hitler’s Health........................................................................................................ 126 A. Medical End Stage ........................................................................................... 127 B. Process of Decline............................................................................................ 128 C. Memory Unaffected......................................................................................... 133 D. Neurological Manifestations............................................................................ 133 E. Summary of Medical Decline .......................................................................... 135 VII. Diagnoses............................................................................................................... 135 A. Methamphetamine Toxicity............................................................................. 136 B. Parkinson’s Disease......................................................................................... 137 VIII. Effects of Drug Toxicity ........................................................................................ 138 A. War with the United States .............................................................................. 138 B. The Holocaust.................................................................................................. 140 C. Stalingrad ......................................................................................................... 141 IX. Conclusion ............................................................................................................. 142 * Professor Emeritus, University of Washington RUTGERS JOURNAL OF LAW AND RELIGION VOLUME 12 FALL 2010 PART 1 I. BACKGROUND As he prepared his 1943 memorandum for the United States Office of Strategic Services, Dr. Henry A. Murray recognized he was severely handicapped by deficits in both amount and reliability of the information available to him.1 He was charged with providing an analysis of Adolf Hitler’s personality and predicting his behavior.2 However, the United States government knew little about Adolf Hitler.3 He had leapt into the world’s spotlight from profound obscurity, leaving behind a personal history that was murky at best, and so, leaving governments and news organizations frantically scrambling to assemble dossiers.4 Filling in blank spaces entailed using some highly questionable sources that, despite ongoing corrections over the intervening decades, cloud the history of Adolf Hitler to this day. Among those sources was a scattering of Germans who had fled Hitler’s Germany seeking refuge in other nations. Some of them sold stories about Hitler and the eager buyers were often duped. Some such accounts were fictional, many were grossly embellished, and others were frankly biased. For example, one prominent “authority,” indeed the primary source apart from Hitler himself (in Mein Kampf) available to Dr. Murray about Hitler’s Vienna years (1906-1913), was Reinhold Hanisch.5 Hanisch and Hitler, who lived in the same men’s hostel, formed a loose business partnership.6 Hitler painted postcards of Vienna scenes that Hanisch peddled to tourists.7 The proceeds were to be divided evenly.8 Hitler, convinced that Hanisch was cheating him, filed a criminal 1 HENRY A. MURRAY, ANALYSIS OF THE PERSONALITY OF ADOLPH HITLER: WITH PREDICTIONS OF HIS FUTURE BEHAVIOR AND SUGGESTIONS FOR DEALING WITH HIM NOW AND AFTER GERMANY’S SURRENDER 2 (1943), available at http://library2.lawschool.cornell.edu/donovan/pdf/Batch_15/Vol_XC.pdf. 2 Cornell Law Library, Introduction to ANALYSIS OF THE PERSONALITY OF ADOLPH HITLER, (last visited Dec. 8, 2010), http://library.lawschool.cornell.edu/WhatWeHave/SpecialCollections/Donovan/Hitler/index.cfm. 3 Id. 4 See generally MURRAY, supra note 1. A trivial, but I think telling example of this problem is a spelling lapse: Dr. Murray uses the conventional “Adolph” rather than “Adolf,” Hitler’s baptismal spelling. 5 Id. at 122. 6 Id. 7 Id. at 58-59. 8 LEONARD L. HESTON & RENATE HESTON, THE MEDICAL CASEBOOK OF ADOLF HITLER: HIS ILLNESSES, DOCTORS, AND DRUGS 67 (Cooper Square Press 2000) (1979). 121 RUTGERS JOURNAL OF LAW AND RELIGION VOLUME 12 FALL 2010 PART 1 complaint, and Hanisch received a jail sentence.9 After Hitler ascended to power, Hanisch turned up in Paris and began selling his story.10 There were several versions, but none putting Hitler in a favorable light.11 Though Dr. Murray must be credited with a brave effort, such faulty data left him no chance at meaningful analysis of Hitler’s personality or predicting his actions. Since 1945, a massive volume of Hitler data has accumulated which attains reasonable reliability largely through its redundancy. This material corrects earlier accounts and adds significant details, but still fails to paint a satisfying portrait of Hitler. The fact that his cognitive abilities were at genius level must be stipulated. The force of his presence is well documented. But which of his specific abilities exceeded human norms and which were within them? What specific motivations were operative at specific junctures in his life? What gratified, what repelled him? What were his personal vulnerabilities? Despite innumerable investigations and speculative essays, there are few satisfactory answers to the many such questions still outstanding. And, of course, inability to adequately describe Hitler’s personality, makes discovering the genesis of it quite impossible. There is sufficient evidence to establish Hitler experienced an adolescent rebellion against authority: overt conflict with his father and his teachers, and passive contempt for the bureaucratic establishments underlying civic organization.12 Hitler’s rebellion was relatively intense and certainly affected his outlook and behavior through his feckless, or at best aimless, Vienna years. II. MILITARY SERVICE Despite this adolescent revulsion, maturation released Hitler from that demon’s hold on his motives and behavior. This is best evidenced by his record of military service (age 25-29).13 Hitler went through four years of trench warfare; he was never disciplined, 9 Id. at 68. 10 Id. 11 See id. (discounting the myths created during this period). 12 See id. at 66-67. 13 See WERNER MASER, HITLER: LEGEND, MYTH & REALITY 88 (Peter Ross and Betty Ross trans., Harper & Row 1973) (1971). 122 RUTGERS JOURNAL OF LAW AND RELIGION VOLUME 12 FALL 2010 PART 1 twice wounded, and awarded an Iron Cross, Germany’s premier military medal, and a distinction rarely awarded to enlisted men.14 How far he had traveled from his Vienna years is demonstrated by the recommendation of his company commander that led to his medal.15 Gefreiter (Lance Corporal) stated Hitler’s courage in both trench and open warfare was exemplary and he always volunteered for tasks in the most dangerous situations.16 Another military official said Hitler demonstrated profound love for his country, exceptional courage, and was regarded by his peers as an outstanding soldier and loyal comrade.17 After the war, several members of his military unit, including his captain and first sergeant, joined Hitler’s Nazi party.18 Hitler’s accomplishments as a soldier diminish the likelihood of major psychological disturbance through his early adult life. Military service, especially arduous and lengthy service, provides one of the most sensitive and reliable litmus tests available for detecting structural personality defects.19 Hitler unquestionably passed the test.20 This negates the many analyses of his personality which projected into his future deficits that may have marked his Vienna years.21 His adult personality was extremely unusual,22 but there is no evidence that any specific ghost from his past significantly encumbered its adult expression.23 III. ANALYTIC TOOLS AND METHODS Dr. Murray attempted to explain Hitler’s behavior and predict his future actions using the tools available a half-century ago.24 Those psychoanalytic theories have been 14 HESTON & HESTON, supra note 8, at 69. 15 See MASER, supra note 13, at 88. 16 Id. 17 Id. at 87-88. 18 HESTON & HESTON, supra note 8, at 69. 19 Id. 20 Id. 21 Id.at 70. 22 Id. at 71. 23 Id. 24 See MURRAY, supra note 1, at 2. 123 RUTGERS JOURNAL OF LAW AND RELIGION VOLUME 12 FALL 2010 PART 1 largely discarded because they proved untestable and, in clinical practice, too often led to faulty assessments and conclusions.25 Today’s tools are not