PCR: People's Republic of China: Songhua River Flood Management

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PCR: People's Republic of China: Songhua River Flood Management Completion Report Project Number: 33437-01 Loan Number: 1919 December 2011 People’s Republic of China: Songhua River Flood Management Sector Project CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS Currency Unit – yuan (CNY) At Appraisal At Project Completion 15 August 2002 23 November 2010 CNY1.00 = $0.12 $0.15 $1.00 = CNY8.28 CNY6.63 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank CPCO – central project coordination office EA – executing agency EMP – environmental management plan FSR – feasibility study report IEE – initial environmental examination IMAR – Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region MWR – Ministry of Water Resources NDRC – National Development and Reform Commission O&M – operation and maintenance PDR – preliminary design report PMO – project management office PRC – People’s Republic of China PSC – project steering committee SWRC – Songliao Water Resources Commission WEIGHTS AND MEASURES ha – hectare km2 – square kilometer m3 – cubic meter mu – a Chinese unit of measurement (15 mu = 1 ha) t – metric ton NOTES In this report, "$" refers to US dollars. Vice-President S. Groff, Operations 2 Director General K. Gerhaeusser, East Asia Department (EARD) Country Director P. Heytens, PRC Resident Mission (PRCM), EARD Team leader X. Shen, Senior Project Officer (Natural Resources and Agriculture), PRCM, EARD Team members M. Gan, Associate Project Analyst, PRCM, EARD X. Jiang, Operations Assistant, PRCM, EARD W. Zhu, Senior Safeguards Officer (Resettlement), PRCM, EARD In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. CONTENTS Page BASIC DATA i MAP v I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 II. EVALUATION OF DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION 1 A. Relevance of Design and Formulation 1 B. Project Outputs 2 C. Project Costs 4 D. Disbursements 4 E. Project Schedule 5 F. Implementation Arrangements 5 G. Conditions and Covenants 6 H. Consultant Recruitment and Procurement 6 I. Performance of Consultants, Contractors, and Suppliers 7 J. Performance of the Borrower and the Executing Agency 7 K. Performance of the Asian Development Bank 7 III. EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 7 A. Relevance 7 B. Effectiveness in Achieving Outcome 8 C. Efficiency in Achieving Outcome and Outputs 8 D. Preliminary Assessment of Sustainability 9 E. Impact 9 IV. OVERALL ASSESSMENT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 11 A. Overall Assessment 11 B. Lessons Learned 12 C. Recommendations 13 APPENDIXES 1. Project Framework 15 2. Component 1: Flood Management System 22 3. Component 2: Flood Control Works 24 4. Project Cost and Financing Plan 28 5. Projected and Actual Contract Awards and Disbursements 30 6. Project Implementation Schedule 31 7. Organization Chart and Flow of Funds 33 8. Status of Compliance with Loan Covenants 34 9. Economic Reevaluation 40 10. Social Impact and Poverty Reduction Assessment 47 11. Evaluation of Land Acquisition and Resettlement Activities 53 12. Environmental Impact Analysis 60 BASIC DATA A. Loan Identification 1. Country People's Republic of China 2. Loan Number 1919 3. Project Title Songhua River Flood Management Sector Project 4. Borrower People's Republic of China 5. Executing Agency 1. Ministry of Water Resources 2. Heilongjiang Provincial Government 3. Jilin Provincial Government 4. Inner Mongolia Autonomous Regional Government 6. Amount of Loan $150.0 million 7. Project Completion Report Number PCR: PRC 1303 B. Loan Data 1. Appraisal (Phase 1) – Date Started 21 October 2001 – Date Completed 5 November 2001 2. Appraisal (Phase 2) – Date Started 23 November 2001 – Date Completed 3 December 2001 3. Loan Negotiations – Date Started 6 August 2002 – Date Completed 8 August 2002 4. Date of Board Approval 20 September 2002 5. Date of Loan Agreement 14 February 2003 6. Date of Loan Effectiveness – In Loan Agreement 15 May 2003 – Actual 29 May 2003 – Number of Extensions 1 7. Closing Date – In Loan Agreement 31 December 2007 – Actual 31 December 2009 – Number of Extensions 1 8. Terms of Loan – Interest Rate London interbank offered rate (LIBOR) based – Maturity (number of years) 25 – Grace Period (number of years) 5 9. Disbursements a. Dates Initial Disbursement Final Disbursement Time Interval 29 May 2003 23 November 2010 90 months Effective Date Original Closing Date Time Interval 29 May 2003 31 December 2007 55 months ii b. Amount ($ million) Net Original Last Revised Amount Amount Amount Undisbursed Category Allocation Allocation Canceled Available Disbursed Balance 01A Civil Works (non- 46.3 60.0 0.9 59.1 59.1 0.0 poor subprojects) 01B Civil Works (poverty 52.6 50.1 0.4 49.7 49.7 0.0 subprojects) 02A Equipment 12.3 16.0 0.5 15.5 15.5 0.0 02B Vehicles 2.5 4.5 0.2 4.3 4.3 0.0 03A Overseas Training 1.4 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 03B Domestic Training 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 04 International 1.9 4.4 0.0 4.4 4.4 0.0 Consultants 05 Monitoring and 0.4 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 Evaluation 06 Incremental PCO 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 Operating Costs 07 Front-end Fee 1.5 1.5 0.0 1.5 1.5 0.0 08 Interest and 14.6 12.2 0.0 12.2 12.2 0.0 Commitment Charge 09 Unallocated 15.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 a Total 150.0 150.0 2.0 148.0 148.0 0.0 PCO=Project Coordination Office. a $1,956,244.08 was cancelled at loan closing. 10. Local Costs (Financed) - Amount ($) $13,324,239 - Percent of Local Costs 4.4% - Percent of Total Cost 3.1% C. Project Data 1. Project Cost ($ million) Cost Appraisal Estimate Actual Foreign Exchange Cost 134.0 134.7 Local Currency Cost 223.7 299.1 Total 357.7 433.8 2. Financing Plan ($ million) Cost Appraisal Estimate Actual Implementation Costs ADB Financed 135.5 135.8 Borrower Financed 207.7 285.8 Sub-total 343.2 421.6 IDC and Commitment Charges ADB Financed 14.5 12.2 Borrower Financed 0.0 0.0 Sub-total 14.5 12.2 Total 357.7 433.8 ADB = Asian Development Bank, IDC = interest during construction. iii 3. Cost Breakdown by Project Component ($ million) Component Appraisal Estimate Actual A. Component 1. Flood Management 29.9 29.8 2. Flood Control Works 307.1 388.3 3. Project Management 4.6 2.0 B. Front-end Fee 1.5 1.5 Total Base Cost 343.1 421.6 C. Interest and Commitment Charges 14.6 12.2 Total Project Cost 357.7 433.8 Source: Songliao Water Resources Commission. 4. Project Schedule Item Appraisal Estimate Actual Date of Contract with Consultants (Package 1) July 2004 July 2004 Date of Contract with Consultants (Package 2) July 2004 July 2004 Completion of Engineering Designs (34 subprojects) March 2004-December 2008 Civil Works Contract Date of Award April 2003 September 2004 Completion of Work November 2006 December 2009 Equipment and Materials First Procurement April 2003 April 2004 Last Procurement November 2006 December 2009 Completion of Equipment and Materials November 2006 December 2009 Start of Operations Heilongjiang Subprojects November 2006 July 2007-December 2009 Inner Mongolia Subprojects November 2006 December 2008-December 2009 Jilin Subprojects November 2006 August 2006-December 2009 5. Project Performance Report Ratings Ratings Development Implementation Implementation Period Objectives Progress From 20 September 2002 to 31 December 2009 Satisfactory Satisfactory D. Data on Asian Development Bank Missions No. of No. of Specialization a Person Name of Mission Date Persons -Days of Members Fact-finding Mission 14–21 September 2001 3 21 a (2), c Appraisal Mission (Phase 1) 21 October – 5 November 2001 4 60 a, c, d, j Appraisal Mission (Phase 2) 23 November–3 December 2001 2 20 a, c Inception Mission 8–19 September 2003 5 24 a, e, k, l, o Loan Review Mission 19–27 August 2004 3 14 a (2), e Loan Review Mission 4–15 April 2005 5 55 a, e, f, h, k (Handover Mission) Mid-term Review 14–25 November 2005 6 53 b, e, f, g, h, j Special Loan Review 10–14 July 2006 3 12 e, f ,h Mission Loan Review Mission 4–15 September 2006 4 40 e, f, k, h Loan Review Mission 3–8 August 2007 3 15 e, f, h Loan Review Mission 19–26 September 2007 3 21 e, f, h iv No. of No. of Specialization a Person- Name of Mission Date Persons Days of Members Special Loan Review Mission 23 June–6 July 2008 4 40 e, f, h, i Special Loan Review Mission 16–20 February 2009 3 12 f (2), m Loan Review Mission 22–29 September 2009 2 14 e, f Loan Review Mission 23–27 November 2009 1 8 f Loan Review Mission 7–11 December 2009 2 8 f, h Special Loan Review Mission 25–26 November 2010 3 6 e, f, h Project Completion Review 11–20 April 2011 4 23 e, f, h, n a a = (senior) project specialist, b = economist (staff consultant), c = programs officer, d = counsel, e = (assistant/associate) project analyst, f = (senior) project officer, g = finance officer, h = (senior) resettlement officer, i = environment officer, j = environment specialist, k = procurement specialist, l = (senior) financial control specialist, m = administrative assistant, n = environmental specialist (staff consultant), o= disbursement specialist. v Map I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. Floods and droughts have produced some of the worst natural disasters in the People’s Republic of China (PRC). The poorest members of society are most at risk from such calamities.
Recommended publications
  • Historical Arable Land Change in an Eco-Fragile Area: a Case Study in Zhenlai County, Northeastern China
    sustainability Article Historical Arable Land Change in an Eco-Fragile Area: A Case Study in Zhenlai County, Northeastern China Yuanyuan Yang 1,2,* and Shuwen Zhang 3 1 Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China 2 Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China 3 Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130102, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 21 August 2018; Accepted: 26 October 2018; Published: 30 October 2018 Abstract: Long-term land changes are cumulatively a major driver of global environmental change. Historical land-cover/use change is important for assessing present landscape conditions and researching ecological environment issues, especially in eco-fragile areas. Arable land is one of the land types influenced by human agricultural activity, reflecting human effects on land-use and land-cover change. This paper selected Zhenlai County, which is part of the farming–pastoral zone of northern China, as the research region. As agricultural land transformation goes with the establishment of settlements, in this research, the historical progress of land transformation in agricultural areas was analyzed from the perspective of settlement evolution, and the historical reconstruction of arable land was established using settlement as the proxy between their inner relationships, which could be reflected by the farming radius. The results show the following. (1) There was little land transformation from nonagricultural areas into agricultural areas until the Qing government lifted the ban on cultivation and mass migration accelerated the process, which was most significant during 1907–1912; (2) The overall trend of land transformation in this region is from northeast to southwest; (3) Taking the topographic maps as references, the spatial distribution of the reconstructed arable land accounts for 47.79% of the maps.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1: Rank of China's 338 Prefecture-Level Cities
    Appendix 1: Rank of China’s 338 Prefecture-Level Cities © The Author(s) 2018 149 Y. Zheng, K. Deng, State Failure and Distorted Urbanisation in Post-Mao’s China, 1993–2012, Palgrave Studies in Economic History, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92168-6 150 First-tier cities (4) Beijing Shanghai Guangzhou Shenzhen First-tier cities-to-be (15) Chengdu Hangzhou Wuhan Nanjing Chongqing Tianjin Suzhou苏州 Appendix Rank 1: of China’s 338 Prefecture-Level Cities Xi’an Changsha Shenyang Qingdao Zhengzhou Dalian Dongguan Ningbo Second-tier cities (30) Xiamen Fuzhou福州 Wuxi Hefei Kunming Harbin Jinan Foshan Changchun Wenzhou Shijiazhuang Nanning Changzhou Quanzhou Nanchang Guiyang Taiyuan Jinhua Zhuhai Huizhou Xuzhou Yantai Jiaxing Nantong Urumqi Shaoxing Zhongshan Taizhou Lanzhou Haikou Third-tier cities (70) Weifang Baoding Zhenjiang Yangzhou Guilin Tangshan Sanya Huhehot Langfang Luoyang Weihai Yangcheng Linyi Jiangmen Taizhou Zhangzhou Handan Jining Wuhu Zibo Yinchuan Liuzhou Mianyang Zhanjiang Anshan Huzhou Shantou Nanping Ganzhou Daqing Yichang Baotou Xianyang Qinhuangdao Lianyungang Zhuzhou Putian Jilin Huai’an Zhaoqing Ningde Hengyang Dandong Lijiang Jieyang Sanming Zhoushan Xiaogan Qiqihar Jiujiang Longyan Cangzhou Fushun Xiangyang Shangrao Yingkou Bengbu Lishui Yueyang Qingyuan Jingzhou Taian Quzhou Panjin Dongying Nanyang Ma’anshan Nanchong Xining Yanbian prefecture Fourth-tier cities (90) Leshan Xiangtan Zunyi Suqian Xinxiang Xinyang Chuzhou Jinzhou Chaozhou Huanggang Kaifeng Deyang Dezhou Meizhou Ordos Xingtai Maoming Jingdezhen Shaoguan
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Attribution and Simulation of Non-Point Source Pollution Load Fux in the Hulan River Basin Yan Liu1,2, Hongyan Li1,2*, Geng Cui3 & Yuqing Cao1,2
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Water quality attribution and simulation of non-point source pollution load fux in the Hulan River basin Yan Liu1,2, Hongyan Li1,2*, Geng Cui3 & Yuqing Cao1,2 Surface water is the main source of irrigation and drinking water for rural communities by the Hulan River basin, an important grain-producing region in northeastern China. Understanding the spatial and temporal distribution of water quality and its driving forces is critical for sustainable development and the protection of water resources in the basin. Following sample collection and testing, the spatial distribution and driving forces of water quality were investigated using cluster analysis, hydrochemical feature partitioning, and Gibbs diagrams. The results demonstrated that the surface waters of the Hulan River Basin tend to be medium–weakly alkaline with a low degree of mineralization and water-rock interaction. Changes in topography and land use, confuence, application of pesticides and fertilizers, and the development of tourism were found to be important driving forces afecting the water quality of the basin. Non-point source pollution load fuxes of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) were simulated using the Soil Water and Assessment Tool. The simulation demonstrated that the non-point source pollution loading is low upstream and increases downstream. The distributions of N and P loading varied throughout the basin. The fndings of this study provide information regarding the spatial distribution of water quality in the region and present a scientifc basis for future pollution control. Rivers are an important component of the global water cycle, connecting the two major ecosystems of land and sea and providing a critical link in the biogeochemical cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Term Evolution of the Chinese Port System (221BC-2010AD) Chengjin Wang, César Ducruet
    Regional resilience and spatial cycles: Long-term evolution of the Chinese port system (221BC-2010AD) Chengjin Wang, César Ducruet To cite this version: Chengjin Wang, César Ducruet. Regional resilience and spatial cycles: Long-term evolution of the Chinese port system (221BC-2010AD). Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, Wiley, 2013, 104 (5), pp.521-538. 10.1111/tesg.12033. halshs-00831906 HAL Id: halshs-00831906 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00831906 Submitted on 28 Sep 2014 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Regional resilience and spatial cycles: long-term evolution of the Chinese port system (221 BC - 2010 AD) Chengjin WANG Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research (IGSNRR) Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) Beijing 100101, China [email protected] César DUCRUET1 French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS) UMR 8504 Géographie-cités F-75006 Paris, France [email protected] Pre-final version of the paper published in Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Vol. 104, No. 5, pp. 521-538. Abstract Spatial models of port system evolution often depict linearly the emergence of hierarchy through successive concentration phases of originally scattered ports.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 86, No. 162/Wednesday, August 25, 2021
    Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 25, 2021 / Proposed Rules 47457 hypothecate, assign, transfer or encumber EXHIBIT A DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR funds or assets in the Escrow Account except ESCROW AGREEMENT, dated ll by and in accordance with the terms of this Fish and Wildlife Service between (Customer) and (Escrow Agent). Agreement. 20. This Agreement is for the benefit of the Passenger Vessels Owned or Chartered 50 CFR Part 17 parties hereto and, accordingly, each and ANNEX 1 [Docket No. FWS–HQ–ES–2020–0100; every provision hereof shall be enforceable FF09E22000 FXES11180900000 212] by any or each or both of them. Additionally, RECOMPUTATION CERTIFICATE this Agreement shall be enforceable by the To: Federal Maritime Commission RIN 1018–BE92 Commission. However, this Agreement shall And To: (‘‘Bank’’) Endangered and Threatened Wildlife not be enforceable by any other party, person ll The undersigned, the Controller of and Plants; Endangered Species or entity whatsoever. hereby furnishes this Recomputation Status for Amur Sturgeon 21. (a) No amendments, modifications or Certificate pursuant to the terms of the other change in the terms of this Agreement Escrow Agreement dated ll, between the AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, shall be effective for any purpose whatsoever Customer and (‘‘Bank’’). Terms herein shall Interior. unless agreed upon in writing by Escrow have the same definitions as those in such ACTION: Proposed rule. Agent and Customer and approved in writing Escrow Agreement and Federal Maritime by the Commission. Commission regulations. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and (b) No party hereto may assign its rights or I.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Introduction to the Dairy Industry in Heilongjiang NBSO Dalian
    A brief introduction to the Dairy Industry in Heilongjiang NBSO Dalian RVO.nl | Brief Introduction Dairy industry Heilongjiang, NBSO Dalian Colofon This is a publication of: Netherlands Enterprise Agency Prinses Beatrixlaan 2 PO Box 93144, 2509 AC, The Hague Phone: 088 042 42 42 Email: via contact form on the website Website: www.rvo.nl This survey has been conducted by the Netherlands Business Support Office in Dalian If you have any questions regarding this business sector in Heilongjiang Province or need any form of business support, please contact NBSO Dalian: Chief Representative: Renée Derks Deputy Representative: Yin Hang Phone: +86 (0)411 3986 9998 Email: [email protected] For further information on the Netherlands Business Support Offices, see www.nbso.nl © Netherlands Enterprise Agency, August 2015 NL Enterprise Agency is a department of the Dutch ministry of Economic Affairs that implements government policy for agricultural, sustainability, innovation, and international business and cooperation. NL Enterprise Agency is the contact point for businesses, educational institutions and government bodies for information and advice, financing, networking and regulatory matters. Although a great degree of care has been taken in the preparation of this document, no rights may be derived from this brochure, or from any of the examples contained herein, nor may NL Enterprise Agency be held liable for the consequences arising from the use thereof. This publication may not be reproduced, in whole, or in part, in any form, without the prior written consent of the publisher. Page 2 of 10 RVO.nl | Brief Introduction Dairy industry Heilongjiang, NBSO Dalian Contents Colofon .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Poverty Alleviation by Relocation Under the Link Policy: a Case Study from Tongyu County, Jilin Province, China
    Article Evaluating Poverty Alleviation by Relocation under the Link Policy: A Case Study from Tongyu County, Jilin Province, China Cunming Zou, Jianzhi Liu, Bencheng Liu, Xuhan Zheng and Yangang Fang * School of Geographical Sciences of Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China; [email protected] (C.Z.); [email protected] (J.L.); [email protected] (B.L.); [email protected] (X.Z.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-431-85099550 Received: 7 September 2019; Accepted: 10 September 2019; Published: 16 September 2019 Abstract: Land, nature, and the social environment in contiguous poor regions are harsh and difficult to change. The poor adaptive capacities of the socio-ecological systems of these regions are the main causes of deep, persistent poverty. In February 2016, the Chinese government issued a policy proposing to promote poverty alleviation by relocation (PAR) by means of the “Linking increases in urban construction land with decreases in rural construction land” policy (or simply, the “Link Policy” or LP), which intends to realize the sustainable social and economic development of local villages. Since then, many pilot projects have been carried out across the country based on local resources, environment, and economic development; however, few related studies on these cases have been conducted. After a review of poverty alleviation policies, this paper first introduces the unsustainable conditions of poor rural areas and the implications and advantages of PAR under the Link Policy; we then analyzed the complete PAR process, including formulation, implementation, and completion, by taking Tongyu County in Jilin Province as an example. The study found that the “whole village relocation” model practiced in Tongyu County was relatively successful in terms of improving the living environment, income, and public services of local villagers.
    [Show full text]
  • A Well-Diversified Developer Northeast China Pan Bohai
    1 Agenda • 2012 Interim Results • Business Review • Future Outlook 2 Key Income Statement Items (RMB million) 1H 2012 1H 2011 % Change Revenue 1,342 2,379 -43.6% Gross Profit 553 1,177 -53.0% Gross Margin (%) 41.2% 49.5% -8.3pts Net Margin 12.4% 39.2% -26.8pts Core Net Profit* 132 401 -67.2% * Excluding net revaluation gain 3 Key Balance Sheet Items (RMB million) 30-Jun-12 31-Dec-11 % Change Net Gearing Cash and Bank Balances 3,436 3,166 +8.5% Total Assets 53,600 50,704 +5.7% Shareholders’ Equity 17,226 17,051 +1.0% 68.7% 69.1% 53.7% Total Borrowings 15,332 14,886 +3.0% Net Gearing Ratio (%) 69.1% 68.7% +0.4pts FY 2010 FY 2011 1H 2012 4 Profitability and Margins Gross Profit Net Profit (RMB million) (RMB million) 933.2 1341 1177 553 366.4 166.2 1H 2010 1H 2011 1H 2012 1H 2010 1H 2011 1H 2012 Gross Margin Net Margin 39.2% 53.7% 49.5% 41.2% 14.7% 12.4% 1H 2010 1H 2011 1H 2012 1H 2010 1H 2011 1H 2012 5 Analysis of Revenue and GFA Sold and Delivered Revenue GFA Sold and Delivered (RMB million) (‘000 sq.m.) 34.3 15.4 8.2 27.8 960 97 96 189 85.7 1H 2012 1,342 1H 2012 27.4 180.0 8.1 10.6 1304 900 111 64 1H 2011 2,379 1H 2011 226.1 43.0 31.4 78.7 2.1 1607 195 686 10 155.2 1H 2010 2,498 1H 2010 Shanghai Region Yangtze River Delta Pan Bohai Rim Northeast China Total 6 Analysis of Revenue and GFA Sold and Delivered Revenue GFA Sold and Delivered 2.7% 4.7% 14.1% 4.7% 7.2% 3.6% 37.8% 7.2% 32.5% 9.6% 79.6% 17.9% 71.5% 54.8% 40.0% 12.1% 1H 2011 1H 2012 1H 2011 1H 2012 Shanghai Region Yangtze River Delta Pan Bohai Rim Northeast China 1H 2011 RMB 2,378.8 million 1H 2011 226.1 thousand sq.m.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.15 Jilin Province Jilin Province Jixin Group Co. Ltd., Affiliated to the Jilin Provincial Prison Administration Bureau, Has 22
    2.15 Jilin Province Jilin Province Jixin Group Co. Ltd., affiliated to the Jilin Provincial Prison Administration Bureau, has 22 prison enterprises Legal representative of the prison company: Feng Gang, Chairman of Jilin Jixin Group Co., Ltd. His official positions in the prison system: Party Committee Member of Jilin Provincial Justice Department, Party Committee Secretary and Director of Jilin Provincial Prison Administration Bureau1 According to the “Notice on Issuing ‘Jilin Province People’s Government Institutional Reform Program’ from the General Office of the CCP Central Committee and the General Office of the State Council” (Ting Zi [2008] No. 25), the Jilin Provincial Prison Administration Bureau (Deputy-department level) was set up as a management agency under the Provincial Justice Department.2 Business areas: The company manages state-owned operating assets of the enterprises within province’s prison system; production, processing and sale of electromechanical equipment (excluding cars), chemical products, apparels, cement, construction materials; production and sale of agricultural and sideline products; labor processing No. Company Name of the Legal Person Legal Registered Business Scope Company Notes on the Prison Name Prison, to which and representative Capital Address the Company Shareholder(s) / Title Belongs 1 Jilin Jixin Jilin Provincial State-owned Feng Gang 70.67 The company manages state-owned 1000 Xinfa According to the “Notice on Issuing Group Co., Prison Asset Chairman of Jilin million operating assets of the
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation Report on IFAD Country Program’S Impact on Poverty Reduction in Rural China (1981-2006)
    Ministry of Finance, P. R. China International Fund for Agricultural Development Evaluation Report on IFAD Country Program’s Impact on Poverty Reduction in Rural China (1981-2006) October, 2006 Beijing, China 1 Contents Contents Monetary Exchange Rate, Weights and Measures, and Abbreviations Executive Summary Part I. Introduction (I) Purpose and Scope of the Evaluation (II)Methodology Part II. Review and Assessment of IFAD’s 25 Years in China (I) Overall Assessment 1. A Brief Review 2. Benefit of IFAD funded projects (1) Economic Benefit (2) Social Benefit (3) Ecological Benefit 3. Impact of IFAD funded projects (1) Impact on food security (2) Impact on farmers’ income (3) Impact on poor population (4) Impact on poverty alleviation policy (5) Impact on rural financial policy (6) Impact on all-level government institutions, project offices and rural community-based organizations (7) Impact on women and the marginalized groups 4. Project Management Efficiency (1) Use of IFAD funded project fund (2) Annual work plan and budget (AWPB) (3) Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) (4) Project audit 5. Project Management Targets (1) Pertinence between IFAD funded projects and government priorities (2) Pertinence between IFAD funded project activities and demands of beneficiaries (3) Pertinence between IFAD funded project adjustment and demands of beneficiaries 6. Project Sustainability (1) Poverty alleviation and development (2) Food security (3) Management of environment and natural resources (4) Capacity building (5) Institutional building (II). Strategy and Cooperation 1. Relationship between IFAD COSOP and poverty alleviation and development strategy of the Chinese government 2 (1) IFAD country strategy (COSOP) (2) Poverty alleviation and development strategy of the Chinese government (3) Inherent relations between IFAD COSOP and the strategy of the Chinese government 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Human Threat to River Ecosystems at the Watershed Scale: an Ecological Security Assessment of the Songhua River Basin, Northeast China
    water Article The Human Threat to River Ecosystems at the Watershed Scale: An Ecological Security Assessment of the Songhua River Basin, Northeast China Yuan Shen 1,2, Huiming Cao 1, Mingfang Tang 1 and Hongbing Deng 1,* 1 State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China; [email protected] (Y.S.); [email protected] (H.C.); [email protected] (M.T.) 2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-10-6284-9112 Academic Editor: Sharon B. Megdal Received: 6 December 2016; Accepted: 13 March 2017; Published: 16 March 2017 Abstract: Human disturbances impact river basins by reducing the quality of, and services provided by, aquatic ecosystems. Conducting quantitative assessments of ecological security at the watershed scale is important for enhancing the water quality of river basins and promoting environmental management. In this study, China’s Songhua River Basin was divided into 204 assessment units by combining watershed and administrative boundaries. Ten human threat factors were identified based on their significant influence on the river ecosystem. A modified ecological threat index was used to synthetically evaluate the ecological security, where frequency was weighted by flow length from the grids to the main rivers, while severity was weighted by the potential hazard of the factors on variables of river ecosystem integrity. The results showed that individual factors related to urbanization, agricultural development and facility construction presented different spatial distribution characteristics. At the center of the plain area, the provincial capital cities posed the highest level of threat, as did the municipal districts of prefecture-level cities.
    [Show full text]
  • Best-Performing Cities: China 2018
    Best-Performing Cities CHINA 2018 THE NATION’S MOST SUCCESSFUL ECONOMIES Michael C.Y. Lin and Perry Wong MILKEN INSTITUTE | BEST-PERFORMING CITIES CHINA 2018 | 1 Acknowledgments The authors are grateful to Laura Deal Lacey, executive director of the Milken Institute Asia Center, Belinda Chng, the center’s director for policy and programs, and Ann-Marie Eu, the Institute’s senior associate for communications, for their support in developing this edition of our Best- Performing Cities series focused on China. We thank the communications team for their support in publication as well as Kevin Klowden, the executive director of the Institute’s Center for Regional Economics, Minoli Ratnatunga, director of regional economic research at the Institute, and our colleagues Jessica Jackson and Joe Lee for their constructive comments on our research. About the Milken Institute We are a nonprofit, nonpartisan think tank determined to increase global prosperity by advancing collaborative solutions that widen access to capital, create jobs, and improve health. We do this through independent, data-driven research, action-oriented meetings, and meaningful policy initiatives. About the Asia Center The Milken Institute Asia Center promotes the growth of inclusive and sustainable financial markets in Asia by addressing the region’s defining forces, developing collaborative solutions, and identifying strategic opportunities for the deployment of public, private, and philanthropic capital. Our research analyzes the demographic trends, trade relationships, and capital flows that will define the region’s future. About the Center for Regional Economics The Center for Regional Economics promotes prosperity and sustainable growth by increasing understanding of the dynamics that drive job creation and promote industry expansion.
    [Show full text]