Salient Features of the Constitution of India
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Conceptions of Political Representation in 19Th and 20Th Century India
Representation in the Shadow of Colonialism: Conceptions of Political Representation in 19th and 20th Century India by Jaby Mathew A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science University of Toronto © Copyright by Jaby Mathew (2017) Representation in the Shadow of Colonialism: Conceptions of Political Representation in 19th and 20th Century India Jaby Mathew Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science University of Toronto 2017 Abstract The starting point of this dissertation is the persistent political underrepresentation of Muslims in Indian legislatures since independence, and how this impugns Indian democracy’s claim to be egalitarian and inclusive. The study argues that specific institutional arrangements for enhancing democratic representation of marginalized groups must be understood in their historical context. Therefore, this dissertation examines the debates over political representation in colonial India, and the terms of settlement in the Constituent Assembly of India, where group representation rights were acknowledged for certain groups but not for religious minorities. Mapping these debates, this work illustrates how the political sociology underlying constituency definition shifted over time and generated the contemporary structure of political exclusion for Muslims. Further, the specific history of political representation in India reveals its use for both non-democratic (representation for ruling or governance) and democratic (representation for self-rule or self-governance) purposes. This dissertation argues that Indian thinkers’ ideas of political representation bear a dual relationship to colonial thinking about representation as a tool for control and governance – a duality that engendered possibilities for an alternative version of liberalism in India. -
Supreet Kaur (B.Com, LL.B., LL.M
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH & ANALYSIS (ISSN 2582 – 6433) VOLUME I ISSUE IV (SEPTEMBER 2020) Email – [email protected] Website – www.ijlra.com 56565656565651 www.ijlra.com Volume IIssue IV|September 2020 ISSN: 2582-6433 DISCLAIMER No part of this publication may be reproduced or copied in any form by any means without prior written permission of Managing Editor of IJLRA. The views expressed in this publication are purely personal opinions of the authors and do not reflect the views of the Editorial Team of IJLRA. Though every effort has been made to ensure that the information in Volume I Issue IV is accurate and appropriately cited/referenced, neither the Editorial Board nor IJLRA shall be held liable or responsible in any manner whatsever for any consequences for any action taken by anyone on the basis of information in the Journal. Copyright © International Journal for Legal Research & Analysis 1 www.ijlra.com Volume IIssue IV|September 2020 ISSN: 2582-6433 EDITORIAL TEAM EDITORS Ms. Ezhiloviya S.P. Nalsar Passout Ms. Priya Singh West Bengal National University of Juridical Science Mr. Ritesh Kumar Nalsar Passout Mrs. Pooja Kothari Practicing Advocate Dr. Shweta Dhand Assistant Professor 2 www.ijlra.com Volume IIssue IV|September 2020 ISSN: 2582-6433 A WORD FROM THE TEAM IJLRA:(ISSN: 2582-6433) is proud to complete its Volume I Issue IV. The current issue consists of articles, short notes, case comments, legislative comments and book reviews, contributed by advocates, academicians, researchers & students from all parts of the country. Each contribution has been thoroughly examined by our editorial team to provide a filtered and quality read. -
SYNOPSIS of DEBATE ______(Proceedings Other Than Questions and Answers) ______Tuesday, December 01, 2015/ Agrahayana 10, 1937 (Saka) ______
RAJYA SABHA _______ SYNOPSIS OF DEBATE _______ (Proceedings other than Questions and Answers) _______ Tuesday, December 01, 2015/ Agrahayana 10, 1937 (Saka) _______ Discussion on Commitment to India’s Constitution as Part of the 125th Birth Anniversary Celebration of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar - Contd. SHRI RAJEEV CHANDRASEKHAR: We must be proud of our Constitution and thankful to our founding fathers for it. The Constitution envisaged a nation lived by the rule of law with equal rights and justice for all without any discrimination, freedom of expression and property rights. But rule of law is ineffective and repeatedly violated. Delayed justice is threatening the whole idea of citizenship. Violence has been repeatedly used as a political tool for several decades. Our Constitution and vision of our founding fathers continues to be violated and vitiated in states, institutions and around the country. In the last 75 years, the rule of law is being violated. We are still struggling to deal with the basic issue of poverty and justice even after 70 years of Independence. We should stay engaged in ensuring development, prosperity, equity and justice for all. A lot more needs to be done than making flowery speeches and help in transforming the country. SHRI K.C. TYAGI: Sincere efforts are needed in building of a country and society. Founding fathers of the Constitution of India ___________________________________________________ This Synopsis is not an authoritative record of the proceedings of the Rajya Sabha. 42 gave their best in framing this Constitution. We are tolerant people who have respect for one and all. Pt. Jawahar Lal Nehru is the founder of modern India. -
India Puttaswamy 1 Joint Judgment 2018
JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR CJI, R K AGRAWAL J, D Y CHANDRACHUD ,and S ABDUL NAZEER J (read by Dr D Y CHANDRACHUD, J): This judgment has been divided into sections to facilitate analysis. They are : A The reference B Decision in M P Sharma C Decision in Kharak Singh D Gopalan doctrine: fundamental rights as isolated silos E Cooper and Maneka: Interrelationship between rights F Origins of privacy G Natural and inalienable rights H Evolution of the privacy doctrine in India I The Indian Constitution • Preamble • Jurisprudence on dignity • Fundamental Rights cases • No waiver of Fundamental Rights • Privacy as intrinsic to freedom and liberty • Discordant Notes : (i) ADM Jabalpur (ii) Suresh Koushal J India’s commitments under International law K Comparative law on privacy (i) UK decisions (ii) US Supreme Court decisions (iii) Constitutional right to privacy in South Africa (iv) Constitutional right to privacy in Canada (v) Privacy under the European Convention on Human Rights and the European Charter (vi) Decisions of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights L Criticisms of the privacy doctrine a Thomson’s Reductionism b Posner’s Economic critique c Bork’s critique d Feminist critique M Constituent Assembly and privacy: limits of originalist interpretation N Is the statutory protection to privacy reason to deny a constitutional right? O Not an elitist construct P Not just a common law right Q Substantive Due Process R Essential nature of privacy S Informational privacy T Conclusions PART A The reference 1 Nine judges of this Court assembled to determine whether privacy is a constitutionally protected value. -
Making of the Constitution of India : a Critical Analysis
January - 2015 Odisha Review Making of the Constitution of India : A Critical Analysis Dr. Abhijit Sahoo Dr. Tusarkanta Pattanaik A country is governed by a set of policies through making, the field of Constitutional and political a framework of laws, rules and regulations. history can only be a richer and more informative Constitution of a democratic country is a resource to understand the complex postcolonial fundamental legal document which lays down the developments in India. basic structure of the government, and other public Making of the Constitution: bodies, their powers, functions; rights and duties of its people and their interrelations. It also Constitution is a living document, an contains the principles to be followed by the state instrument which makes the government system in the governance of the country. work. A Constitution is the highest law of the land, The writing of the Indian which defines and limits the Constitution has often been powers of government and its celebrated for its momentousness, various branches, vis-à-vis each as it came at the end of a long other, and the people, and period of anti-colonial struggle. provides a strong foundation for However, very little has been a state based on the rule of law. written on the making of the The design of a Constitution and Constitution. Often, the event of its process of development can drafting the Constitution is written- play an important role in peaceful off as part of a logical end to the political transitions and post- British Empire in India or as part conflict peace building. -
WHAT AILS the IAS? I MEASURE the PROGRESS of a COMMUNITY by the # Books to Read 111 DEGREE of PROGRESS WHICH WOMEN HAVE ACHIEVED # Social Issues
Editorial Note Indian Republic @70 (People who steered India's founding document) Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: A scholar of law, economics, sociology Alladi Krishnaswamy Iyer,” Ambedkar said about him. and political science, BR Ambedkar was born in 1891 in the K. M. Munshi: The lawyer, educationist and writer was born Central Provinces at a time when people from oppressed in 1887 in Gujarat and spent his initial years as a lawyer castes faced formidable barriers in education and jobs. before jumping into politics. In the Constituent Assembly, Nevertheless, Ambedkar earned doctorates from Columbia he was a member of 11 committees—the highest University and the London School of Economics before number for any person. plunging into Indian politics and organising the lower After Independence, he became the agriculture minister castes. and then the governor of Uttar Pradesh. A prolific writer in Often called the Father of the Constitution, Ambedkar Gujarati, English and Hindi, he founded the Bharatiya was the head of the drafting committee and India's first Vidya Bhavan and was one of the founding members of law minister. Swatantra Party. Alladi Krishnaswami Ayyar: Born in 1883 in the erstwhile Jaipal Singh: A politician, writer and athlete, Jaipal Singh Madras Presidency, Ayyar was responsible for key sections Munda was born in 1903 near Ranchi and emerged as one of the Constitution, and on whom praise was heaped by BR of the most vocal advocates for India's tribal communities Ambedkar. The son of a priest, Ayyar studied history and in the Constituent Assembly. He spent his childhood then law, quickly becoming a leading member of the looking after cattle but academic brilliance saw him Madras bar. -
New Chennai Chennai, Formerly Madras, City, Capital of Tamil Nadu
1 Older Chennai New chennai ➢ Chennai, formerly Madras, city, capital of Tamil Nadu state. Known as the “Gateway to South India. ➢ Chennai is the 400 year old city is the 31st largest metropolitan area in the world. ➢ Chennai is the India’s fifth largest city. History of Chennai: ➢ Originally known as "Madras", was located in the province of Tondaimandalam, an area lying between Penna River of Nellore and the Ponnaiyar river of Cuddalore. t.me/shanawithu t.me/civilcentric Brother Mentor Contact No:9500833976 2 ➢ The name Madras was Derived from Madrasan a fisherman head who lived in coastal area of Madras. ➢ The Original Name of Madras Is Puliyur kottam which is 2000 year old Tamil ancient name. ➢ Tondaimandalam was ruled in the 2nd century CE by Tondaiman Ilam Tiraiyan who was a representative of the Chola family at Kanchipuram. ➢ Chennai was ruled by cholas, satavahanas,pallavas and Pandiyas. ➢ The Vijayanagar rulers appointed chieftain known as Nayaks who ruled over the different regions of the province almost independently. ➢ Damarla Venkatapathy Nayak, an influential chieftain under Venkata III, who was in-charge of the area of present Chennai city, gave the grant of a piece of land lying between the river Cooum almost at the point it enters the sea and another river known as Egmore river to the English in 1639. ➢ On this piece of waste land was founded the Fort St. George exactly for business considerations. ➢ In honour of Chennappa Nayak, father of Venkatapathy Nayak, who controlled the entire coastal country from Pulicat in the north to the Portuguese settlement of Santhome, the settlement which had grown up around Fort St. -
Volume-2 Issue-II
TAMIL NADU NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW Volume II Issue II of 2019 Editorial Two’s the Limit: Challenging the Two-Child Limit in the UK - Meghan Campbell Defence of Failing Firm in Indian Merger Control: A Legal Analysis - Kunal Kishore Bilaney and Nikita Ganesh Environmental Personhood: Opportunities and Pitfalls in Conservation of Environment - Suhani Chanchlani Corruption in International Investment Law: Understanding the Concept and Patterns of Transnational Corruption in Foreign Investments - Abhishek Rana Individual Autonomy, Privacy and Conjugal Rights: Re-examining the Constitutional Vires of Restitution of Conjugal Rights - Shiva Pande TAMIL NADU NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW Volume II Issue II of 2019 Vice-Chancellor Prof. (Dr.) V.S. Elizabeth EDITORS: Sahana Pal Sumedha Ray Sarkar STUDENT EDITORS: Aishwaryaa Annamalai Amoolya Vinjamur Ashwin Bala Someshwerar Indumugi C. Shachi Srivastava Sowmya Srinivasan ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The TNNLU Law Review Editorial Board would like to express their heartfelt gratitude to the Vice– Chancellor, Prof. (Dr.) V.S. Elizabeth, and the Registrar Ms. K.S. Leela for their active cooperation and assistance in publishing the third issue of the TNNLU Law Review. This would not have been possible without the continued guidance and encouragement of our former Vice-Chancellor, Prof. (Dr.) Kamala Sankaran, who had been an instrumental force behind this publication from its very first day. The Editorial Board would also like to thank each and every one of the peer reviewers, who took out time from their incredibly busy schedules and patiently reviewed all the articles with appropriate feedback and suggestions for improvement. Last but not least, the biggest thanks are due to all our readers across the country. -
JUSTICE DR. M. RAMA JOIS Former Chief Justice of Punjab and Haryana High Court Former Governor of Jharkhand and Bihar Former Member of Parliament, Rajya Sabha
1 THE W.B. NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF JURIDICIAL SCIENCES, KOLKATA Tenth Durga Das Basu Memorial Lecture Saturday, the 11th February 2017 Uniform Law regulating the Constitution and Organization Of High Courts Necessary By JUSTICE DR. M. RAMA JOIS Former Chief Justice of Punjab and Haryana High Court Former Governor of Jharkhand and Bihar Former Member of Parliament, Rajya Sabha 2 I feel greatly honoured by the invitation extended to me by the W.B. National University of Juridical Sciences to deliver the 10th Durga Das Basu Memorial Lecture. The earlier lectures delivered by eminent jurists such as Fali S. Nariman, K.K. Venugopal, Padma Vibhushan Justice M.N. Venkatachalaiah, former Chief Justice of India, with whom I had the opportunity of sitting in the Division Bench in the High Court of Karnataka for over two years on the most important topics of Constitution and Constitutionalism have been furnished to me. By a reading of these lectures, I have been greatly benefitted. I was given the choice to select any subject for the 10th Durga Das Basu Memorial Lecture. Having regard to the fact that though the Constitution of Bharat which is the longest and well drafted Constitution in the World vide at Entry 78 of the Union List in the 7th Schedule to the Constitution, specified the subject Constitution and Organization of the High Courts on which the Parliament alone is competent to enact a law but no such law so far has been enacted and as a result, there have been divergent practices and procedures in different High Courts, I considered it appropriate and necessary to deliver the 10th Durga Das Basu Memorial Lecture on the topic of Uniform Law regulating the Constitution and Organization of High Courts necessary. -
Legalizing the Revolution Sandipto Dasgupta Submitted in Partial
Legalizing the Revolution Sandipto Dasgupta Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2014 © 2014 Sandipto Dasgupta All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT Legalizing the Revolution Sandipto Dasgupta This dissertation reconstructs a theoretical framework for the Indian Constitution. It does so immanently, by focusing on the making of the Indian Constitution, taking into account both the demands of its specific historical conditions, and the formal constraints of drafting a constitution. The dissertation shows that in its historical context the task of the Indian constitution makers should be understood as creating a constitutional system that can mediate a transformation of the social condition. Performing this task required reinterpreting the established tenets of constitutionalism. The reinterpretation produces a distinct variation of constitutionalism that is termed transformational constitutionalism. Part I of the dissertation focuses on some of the central tenets of constitutional theory by examining the writings in which they first assumed their paradigmatic form. The concepts are situated in the historical context in which they were formulated to highlight the specific challenges they were a response to, and hence distinguishing them from the conceptual terrain in which the Indian Constitution was formulated. Part I also shows the essentially preservative nature of the main tenets of constitutional thought, and that the fully developed versions of its central concepts seek to preclude any possibility for major changes in social conditions. Part II sets out the historical developments that led to the material and ideational terrain on which the Indian Constitution was conceived. -
Addressing Judicial Activism in the Indian Supreme Court: Towards an Evolved Debate Madhav Khosla
Hastings International and Comparative Law Review Volume 32 Article 2 Number 1 Winter 2009 1-1-2009 Addressing Judicial Activism in the Indian Supreme Court: Towards an Evolved Debate Madhav Khosla Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/ hastings_international_comparative_law_review Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, and the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Madhav Khosla, Addressing Judicial Activism in the Indian Supreme Court: Towards an Evolved Debate, 32 Hastings Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 55 (2009). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_international_comparative_law_review/vol32/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings International and Comparative Law Review by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Addressing Judicial Activism in the Indian Supreme Court: Towards an Evolved Debate By MADHAV KHOSLA* I. Introduction In recent years, the Indian Supreme Court has invited significant attention for the important position it has come to occupy within the nation's politics. Commentary on the working of the Court has been varied, with some scholars voicing strong opposition to the judiciary's rise,2 while others highlighting its role in the achievement of social *Research Assistant, Commission on Centre-State Relations, Government of India. All views expressed are my own. I wish to thank the Hon. Justice H.S. Bedi (Supreme Court of India), Paul Craig (University of Oxford), Madhava Menon (Commission on Centre-State Relations, Government of India), Sudhir Krishnaswamy (National Law School of India University) and Ananth Padmanabhan (Advocate, High Court of Judicature at Madras) for their useful comments and suggestions. -
Judicial Activism and Its Impact on the Administration of Justice in India (With Reference to Separation of Power)
JUDICIAL ACTIVISM AND ITS IMPACT ON THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE IN INDIA (WITH REFERENCE TO SEPARATION OF POWER) THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN LAW BY RACHNA SINGH (ENROLMENT NO.: GC-7237) UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF Prof. (Dr.) IQBAL ALI KHAN CHAIRMAN & FORMER DEAN DEPARTMENT OF LAW ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY ALIGARH-202002 (INDIA) 2016 JUDICIAL ACTIVISM AND ITS IMPACT ON THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE IN INDIA (WITH REFERENCE TO SEPARATION OF POWER) ABSTRACT SUBMITTED FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN LAW BY RACHNA SINGH (ENROLMENT NO.: GC-7237) UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF Prof. (Dr.) IQBAL ALI KHAN CHAIRMAN & FORMER DEAN DEPARTMENT OF LAW ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY ALIGARH-202002 (INDIA) 2016 DEPARTMENT OF LAW ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY ALIGARH, INDIA Prof. (Dr.) Iqbal Ali Khan Date………….. Chairman & Former Dean CERTIFICATE It gives me immense pleasure to certify that Ms Rachna Singh, Research Scholar bearing Admission No. : Ph.D.-L-574-09 and Enrolment No.: GC-7237 has completed this Thesis entitled, “JUDICIAL ACTIVISM AND ITS IMPACT ON THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE IN INDIA (WITH REFERENCE TO SEPARATION OF POWER)” for the award of the Ph.D. Degree, under my supervision. The present work is an original contribution in the field of Constitutional Law. Prof. (Dr.) Iqbal Ali Khan ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I bow in reverence to the Almighty God whose benign benediction gave me the required zeal for the completion of this work. Prof. (Dr.) Iqbal Ali Khan, Chairman & Former Dean, Department of Law, my supervisor, is one of those rare teachers who are paragons of knowledge and a source of strength & inspiration to their students.