Ponderosa Pine Forests Fescue E H

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ponderosa Pine Forests Fescue E H Plants of New Mexico Arizona Ponderosa pine forests fescue E H A L New Mexico locust © Scott Sink Ponderosa pine Buckbrush Pine dropseed I F Gambel oak M B Woods Cliffrose rose N Mountain Mountain mahogany muhly C G Squirreltail Juniper J O P Wax Barberry Skunkbush sumac currant Cheatgrass D Barberry (Mahonia repens) • K Shrub up to 1' tall and 1' wide. Arizona fescue (Festuca arizonica) • Bunchgrass, 1–3' Leaves 2–3" long and 1–2" wide, New Mexico locust (Robina tall. Leaves (blades) tightly often mottled red, serrated neomexicana) • Shrub 5–30' tall rolled, appear cylindrical. Seed Ponderosa pine (Pinus edges, evDergreen. Flowers 5–20' wide. Stems light brown, yellow, maturing to blue berries. heads goldenL. ponderosa) • Tree up to 120' covered with thorns. Leaves 12" tall, 40' wide; much smaller in long, compund with 9–15 leaflets. thickets. Bark black, turning Buckbrush (Ceanothus fendlerii) Flowers whitHe–pink, ½" long in Pine dropseed (Blepharoneuron yellow with age, smells like • Shrub to 3' tall, 3' wide. clusters. Bean-like seedpods. tricholepis) • Bunchgrass, 6–8", vanilla. 2–3 nAeedles per cluster, Branches have small spines. leaf blades abundant, slender, cones 3–6" long. Leaves dark green, ½" long. Cliffrose (Purshia mexicana) • erect, SeedM heads blue-gray. Flowers whiEte, in tiny clumps. Shrub to 12', 8' wide, much Gambel oak (Quercus gambelii) Grows vigorously after fire. smaller in harsh conditions. Bark Mountain muhly (Muhlenbergia • Small tree to 8–50' tall, crown gray, shreddy. Leaves ½–¾" long, montana) • Bunchgrass 10–30" 5–30' wide. Leaves lobed. deeply lobed, white underneath. Woods' rose (Rosa woodsii)• I tall. Dead blades curl like wood Acorns 1" long. Bark gray, Flowers cream-colored, 1" wide. Shrub 1–6' tall and 3–6' wide. shavings. Seed heads blue-grey. checkered to flakey. N B Leaves 2" long, compound with Fruits feather-tailed, clustered. 5–9 leaflets, serrated edges. Squirreltail (Elymus elymoides) Flowers pink, 2" wide, five Mountain mahogany (Cerco- Juniper (Juniperus spp.) • Tree • Perennial grass up to 20" tall petals, matuFring to red rosehips, carpus montanus) • Shrub to 9'. 20–40' high, 5–20' wide. and 15" wide. Leaf blades come ½" long. Thorns to 1/3" long. Leaves dark green, leathery, to Needles short, scaly. Cones from base of plant, generally ("berries") round, red or purple, ½" long. FloweJrs yellow and red, smooth. SeeOd heads resemble a ½" diameter, smell of gin. Utah Skunkbush sumac (Rhus trumpet-shaped, 2" long. "bottlebrush," seeds 1–3" long. juniper: barCk shaggy. Rocky trilobata). • Shrub up to 7' tall. Mt., one-seed juniper: bark Leaves 1–2", lobed. Flowers Wax currant (Ribes cereum) • Cheatgrass (Broums tectorum) scaly. Alligator juniper: bark yellow-white in small clusters, Shrub to 4' tall. Red or tan • Grass to 2'. Blades emerge in checkered. maturing to sGticky red berries. twigs. Leaves lobed, ¾–1½" fall. Seedheads red/purple, long. BerriesK red, waxy. drooping. Rapid spring growth, matures befoPre other grasses; Trees, shrubs, and grasses invasive species Produced for the USDA Forest Service Collaborative Forest Restoration Program multi-party monitoring teams. Research and compilation Joe Trudeau, Ecological Restoration Institute (ERI); design and production Joel Viers, ERI. Funded by USDA Forest Service. Illustrations provided by and copyright © Robert DeWitt Ivey, Zackery Zdinak, Lucretia Breazeale Hamilton, Scott Sink. No reproduction without written permission. Plants of New Mexico Ponderosa pine forests A J D Fleabane G Locoweed Yarrow Mullein K H E Purple geranium B Bracken fern Rocky Mountain iris Silvery lupine F C L I Scarlet gilia Pingue rubberweed Whitemargin pussytoes* Mountain parsley Locoweed (Oxytropis lambertii) Yarrow (Achillea millefolium) • Mullein (Verbascum thapsus) • • ¾" long purple pea-like Feathery leaves 2–6" long, ½" Readily invades disturbed sites Fleabane (Erigeron spp.) • flowers in clusters to 9" tall. wide in rosettes of many leaves. but only persists for a few Many species. Small white, Leaves to 5" long with 11–17 White flat-topped clusters of years. First year forms basal fuzzy leaflets, sometimes flowers on stDalk 6–20" tall. pink, or light purple flowers with rosette of large soft, fuzzy appearing grAay. Seedstalk turns leaves, second year sends up numerous nKarrow petals and pale yellow and stays standing Bracken fern (Pteridium seed stalk to 7' high. Hundreds yellow center. after releasing seed. aquilinum) • A large fern, to 3' of bright Hyellow flowers tall. Fronds triangular, usually maturing to round seed pods of Purple geranium (Geranium with three leaflets with many Rocky Mountain iris, blue flag tiny black seeds. Seed stalk caespitosum) • Pink or purple tiny leaves. Grows in large (Iris missouriensis) • Common dries to a stout brown shaft that flowers; up to 10" tall; few colonies in fields, brushy areas, in moist sites, and into the persists through winter. flowers per plant. Thin creeping and woods. Thick root-like mixed conifer zone. Showy stems, often red. Leaves five- underground stems, to 6' long; Silvery lupine (Lupinus purplish petals and white sepals E lobed, smellyL when crushed, red many fronds may grow from argenteus) • Branching flowers with blue stripes on round stem in autumn. each stem. Vigorous after to 3' tall. Leaves fuzzy when to 24" tall. Long, narrow leaves B disturbance. Cover for small young; 5–9 narrow lobes; pea- from base of plant. Grows in M o u n t a i n p a r s l e y animals and emerging plants. like flowers in tall clusters; groups. Growth depends on purple. AggresIsive growth after (Pseudocymopterus montanus) adequate snowfall. fire. • Up to 30" tall. Yellow flowers Whitemargin pussytoes in flat-topped clusters. Leaves Pingue rubber weed Scarlet gilia, skyrocket (Antennaria marginata) • Small green, broad, feathery, with (Hymenoxys richardsonii) • To (Ipomopsis aggregato) • Bright plant lying close to ground many poinMted lobes. Strong 12" tall, several to dozens of red, trumpet-shaped flowers forming mats. Necktie shaped scent. woody stems in a bunch, wooly along stalk to 3' tall. Dark green leaves ½–1" long, slightly hairy at base. Yellow daisy-like leaves with narrow lobes. First underneath, with a white F flowers ½" wide maturing to * Cronquist, A. and A. H. Holmgren, N. H. year it consists of leaves close J Holmgren, J. L. Reveal and P. K. Holmgren. appearance. White clusters of C wooly tufts of seeds. Very 1994. Intermountain Flora Vascular Plants of the to the ground, second year it flowers on stalks 2–4" tall. narrow leaves, poisonous to Intermountain West, USA. The New York grows higher and then flowers. Botanical Garden. Bronx, NY. Volume 5. livestock. Wildflowers Produced for the USDA Forest Service Collaborative Forest Restoration Program multi-party monitoring teams. Research and compilation Joe Trudeau, Ecological Restoration Institute (ERI); design and production Joel Viers, ERI. Funded by USDA Forest Service. Illustrations provided by and copyright © Robert DeWitt Ivey, Zackery Zdinak, Lucretia Breazeale Hamilton. No reproduction without written permission. www.eri.nau.edu..
Recommended publications
  • References and Appendices
    References Ainley, D.G., S.G. Allen, and L.B. Spear. 1995. Off- Arnold, R.A. 1983. Ecological studies on six endan- shore occurrence patterns of marbled murrelets gered butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae): in central California. In: C.J. Ralph, G.L. Hunt island biogeography, patch dynamics, and the Jr., M.G. Raphael, and J.F. Piatt, technical edi- design of habitat preserves. University of Cali- tors. Ecology and Conservation of the Marbled fornia Publications in Entomology 99: 1–161. Murrelet. USDA Forest Service, General Techni- Atwood, J.L. 1993. California gnatcatchers and coastal cal Report PSW-152; 361–369. sage scrub: the biological basis for endangered Allen, C.R., R.S. Lutz, S. Demairais. 1995. Red im- species listing. In: J.E. Keeley, editor. Interface ported fire ant impacts on Northern Bobwhite between ecology and land development in Cali- populations. Ecological Applications 5: 632-638. fornia. Southern California Academy of Sciences, Allen, E.B., P.E. Padgett, A. Bytnerowicz, and R.A. Los Angeles; 149–169. Minnich. 1999. Nitrogen deposition effects on Atwood, J.L., P. Bloom, D. Murphy, R. Fisher, T. Scott, coastal sage vegetation of southern California. In T. Smith, R. Wills, P. Zedler. 1996. Principles of A. Bytnerowicz, M.J. Arbaugh, and S. Schilling, reserve design and species conservation for the tech. coords. Proceedings of the international sym- southern Orange County NCCP (Draft of Oc- posium on air pollution and climate change effects tober 21, 1996). Unpublished manuscript. on forest ecosystems, February 5–9, 1996, River- Austin, M. 1903. The Land of Little Rain. University side, CA.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Plant Survey of San Juan Public Lands, Colorado
    Rare Plant Survey of San Juan Public Lands, Colorado 2005 Prepared by Colorado Natural Heritage Program 254 General Services Building Colorado State University Fort Collins CO 80523 Rare Plant Survey of San Juan Public Lands, Colorado 2005 Prepared by Peggy Lyon and Julia Hanson Colorado Natural Heritage Program 254 General Services Building Colorado State University Fort Collins CO 80523 December 2005 Cover: Imperiled (G1 and G2) plants of the San Juan Public Lands, top left to bottom right: Lesquerella pruinosa, Draba graminea, Cryptantha gypsophila, Machaeranthera coloradoensis, Astragalus naturitensis, Physaria pulvinata, Ipomopsis polyantha, Townsendia glabella, Townsendia rothrockii. Executive Summary This survey was a continuation of several years of rare plant survey on San Juan Public Lands. Funding for the project was provided by San Juan National Forest and the San Juan Resource Area of the Bureau of Land Management. Previous rare plant surveys on San Juan Public Lands by CNHP were conducted in conjunction with county wide surveys of La Plata, Archuleta, San Juan and San Miguel counties, with partial funding from Great Outdoors Colorado (GOCO); and in 2004, public lands only in Dolores and Montezuma counties, funded entirely by the San Juan Public Lands. Funding for 2005 was again provided by San Juan Public Lands. The primary emphases for field work in 2005 were: 1. revisit and update information on rare plant occurrences of agency sensitive species in the Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP) database that were last observed prior to 2000, in order to have the most current information available for informing the revision of the Resource Management Plan for the San Juan Public Lands (BLM and San Juan National Forest); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plants and a Brief History of the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands
    United States Department of Agriculture Vascular Plants and a Brief Forest Service Rocky Mountain History of the Kiowa and Rita Research Station General Technical Report Blanca National Grasslands RMRS-GTR-233 December 2009 Donald L. Hazlett, Michael H. Schiebout, and Paulette L. Ford Hazlett, Donald L.; Schiebout, Michael H.; and Ford, Paulette L. 2009. Vascular plants and a brief history of the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS- GTR-233. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 44 p. Abstract Administered by the USDA Forest Service, the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands occupy 230,000 acres of public land extending from northeastern New Mexico into the panhandles of Oklahoma and Texas. A mosaic of topographic features including canyons, plateaus, rolling grasslands and outcrops supports a diverse flora. Eight hundred twenty six (826) species of vascular plant species representing 81 plant families are known to occur on or near these public lands. This report includes a history of the area; ethnobotanical information; an introductory overview of the area including its climate, geology, vegetation, habitats, fauna, and ecological history; and a plant survey and information about the rare, poisonous, and exotic species from the area. A vascular plant checklist of 816 vascular plant taxa in the appendix includes scientific and common names, habitat types, and general distribution data for each species. This list is based on extensive plant collections and available herbarium collections. Authors Donald L. Hazlett is an ethnobotanist, Director of New World Plants and People consulting, and a research associate at the Denver Botanic Gardens, Denver, CO.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the United States National Museum
    A REVISION OF CERTAIN SPECIES OF PLANTS OF THE GENUS ANTENNARIA. By Elias Nelson. Scieniific Ai<L U. S. Department of A(jrietiJliire. Recent study of the genus Anton niiria in North America has been (djVHa, A. contined almost entirely to the o-roup represented by .1. These, as dioka, and A. plantaglnifolia of Gray's Synoptical Flora. treated by Dr. Gray, have proved to be ac^gregates. The names .1. plants, and (djnna and .i. dloJca were originally applied to Old World referal)le to those species. it appears that no American specimens are had Prior to 1897 only live species of the North American continent Rich- been described in this group, viz, ^L planfaghiifolia (Linna?us) pJanta- ardson, A. monocephala De CandoUe, A. soUtaria Rydberg (.1. Nuttall, and ginifolia monocephala Torrey and Gray), A. parolfdia about A. lahradorica Nuttall. During the last four years, however, 50 additional species have been published. The Antennarias of many parts of North America are as yet little known, and much research Fernald has in connection with the genus is still necessary. Mr, succeeded in arriving at a very satisfactory arrangement of the New England Antennarias. Those of other regions are in need of similar study. of the In this paper an attempt is made at a natural arrangement western and northern species of this group. A tolerably satisfactory synopsis can hardly be expected until more material from this vast imperfectly known; region is at hand. Many of the species are very Especially is a considerable number from their type localities only. variability this true of the far northern species.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Flora of West Clear Creek Wilderness, Coconino and Yavapai
    VASCULAR FLORA OF WEST CLEAR CREEK WILDERNESS, COCONINO AND YAVAPAI COUNTIES, ARIZONA By Wendy C. McBride A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Biology Northern Arizona University May 2016 Approved: Tina J. Ayers, Ph.D., Chair Randall W. Scott, Ph.D. Liza M. Holeski, Ph.D. ABSTRACT VASCULAR FLORA OF WEST CLEAR CREEK WILDERNESS, COCONINO AND YAVAPAI COUNTIES, ARIZONA WENDY C. MCBRIDE West Clear Creek Wilderness bisects the Mogollon Rim in Arizona, and is nested between the Colorado Plateau and Basin and Range physiographic provinces. Between 2013 and 2016, a floristic inventory vouchered 542 taxa and reviewed 428 previous collections to produce a total plant inventory of 594 taxa from 93 families and 332 genera. The most species rich families Were Asteraceae, Poaceae, Fabaceae, Brassicaceae, Rosaceae, Plantaginaceae, Cyperaceae, and Polygonaceae. Carex, Erigeron, Bromus, Muhlenbergia, and Oenothera Were the most represented genera. Nonnative taxa accounted for seven percent of the total flora. Stachys albens was vouchered as a new state record for Arizona. New county records include Graptopetalum rusbyi (Coconino), Pseudognaphalium pringlei (Coconino), Phaseolus pedicellatus var. grayanus (Coconino), and Quercus rugosa (Coconino and Yavapai). This study quantified and contrasted native species diversity in canyon versus non- canyon floras across the Southwest. Analyses based on eighteen floras indicate that those centered about a major canyon feature shoW greater diversity than non-canyon floras. Regression models revealed that presence of a canyon Was a better predictor of similarity between floras than was the distance betWeen them. This study documents the remarkable diversity found Within canyon systems and the critical, yet varied, habitat they provide in the southwestern U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Jeffrey James Keeling Sul Ross State University Box C-64 Alpine, Texas 79832-0001, U.S.A
    AN ANNOTATED VASCULAR FLORA AND FLORISTIC ANALYSIS OF THE SOUTHERN HALF OF THE NATURE CONSERVANCY DAVIS MOUNTAINS PRESERVE, JEFF DAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS, U.S.A. Jeffrey James Keeling Sul Ross State University Box C-64 Alpine, Texas 79832-0001, U.S.A. [email protected] ABSTRACT The Nature Conservancy Davis Mountains Preserve (DMP) is located 24.9 mi (40 km) northwest of Fort Davis, Texas, in the northeastern region of the Chihuahuan Desert and consists of some of the most complex topography of the Davis Mountains, including their summit, Mount Livermore, at 8378 ft (2554 m). The cool, temperate, “sky island” ecosystem caters to the requirements that are needed to accommo- date a wide range of unique diversity, endemism, and vegetation patterns, including desert grasslands and montane savannahs. The current study began in May of 2011 and aimed to catalogue the entire vascular flora of the 18,360 acres of Nature Conservancy property south of Highway 118 and directly surrounding Mount Livermore. Previous botanical investigations are presented, as well as biogeographic relation- ships of the flora. The numbers from herbaria searches and from the recent field collections combine to a total of 2,153 voucher specimens, representing 483 species and infraspecies, 288 genera, and 87 families. The best-represented families are Asteraceae (89 species, 18.4% of the total flora), Poaceae (76 species, 15.7% of the total flora), and Fabaceae (21 species, 4.3% of the total flora). The current study represents a 25.44% increase in vouchered specimens and a 9.7% increase in known species from the study area’s 18,360 acres and describes four en- demic and fourteen non-native species (four invasive) on the property.
    [Show full text]
  • FERNS and FERN ALLIES Dittmer, H.J., E.F
    FERNS AND FERN ALLIES Dittmer, H.J., E.F. Castetter, & O.M. Clark. 1954. The ferns and fern allies of New Mexico. Univ. New Mexico Publ. Biol. No. 6. Family ASPLENIACEAE [1/5/5] Asplenium spleenwort Bennert, W. & G. Fischer. 1993. Biosystematics and evolution of the Asplenium trichomanes complex. Webbia 48:743-760. Wagner, W.H. Jr., R.C. Moran, C.R. Werth. 1993. Aspleniaceae, pp. 228-245. IN: Flora of North America, vol.2. Oxford Univ. Press. palmeri Maxon [M&H; Wagner & Moran 1993] Palmer’s spleenwort platyneuron (Linnaeus) Britton, Sterns, & Poggenburg [M&H; Wagner & Moran 1993] ebony spleenwort resiliens Kunze [M&H; W&S; Wagner & Moran 1993] black-stem spleenwort septentrionale (Linnaeus) Hoffmann [M&H; W&S; Wagner & Moran 1993] forked spleenwort trichomanes Linnaeus [Bennert & Fischer 1993; M&H; W&S; Wagner & Moran 1993] maidenhair spleenwort Family AZOLLACEAE [1/1/1] Azolla mosquito-fern Lumpkin, T.A. 1993. Azollaceae, pp. 338-342. IN: Flora of North America, vol. 2. Oxford Univ. Press. caroliniana Willdenow : Reports in W&S apparently belong to Azolla mexicana Presl, though Azolla caroliniana is known adjacent to NM near the Texas State line [Lumpkin 1993]. mexicana Schlechtendal & Chamisso ex K. Presl [Lumpkin 1993; M&H] Mexican mosquito-fern Family DENNSTAEDTIACEAE [1/1/1] Pteridium bracken-fern Jacobs, C.A. & J.H. Peck. Pteridium, pp. 201-203. IN: Flora of North America, vol. 2. Oxford Univ. Press. aquilinum (Linnaeus) Kuhn var. pubescens Underwood [Jacobs & Peck 1993; M&H; W&S] bracken-fern Family DRYOPTERIDACEAE [6/13/13] Athyrium lady-fern Kato, M. 1993. Athyrium, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Type Localities of Plants First Described from New
    THE TYPE LOCALITIES OF PLANTS FIRST DESCRIBED FROM NEW MEXICO. tty Paul C. Standley. INTRODUCTION. In the endeavor to settle the application of old names it is often of the greatest advantage to know exactly where the specimens from which a certain species was described were collected. This is dem- onstrated by the difficulty experienced by botanists in determining the proper reference of names based upon plants cultivated in botan- * ical gardens. With specimens from the type locality of a species one can often supplement a scanty type much better than with specimens that are apparently the same, but collected in other localities. When a description is brief and imperfect and no type has been designated, this is often the only method of interpreting the author's meaning. Unfortunately it is only lately that botanists have come to regard the designation of types and type localities as important. The earlier botanical writers did not consider the practice necessary, underesti- mating the possible development of systematic botany. They were accustomed to assign their new species to large and often indefinite areas, such as "the eastern coast of North America," "Canada," ''west of the Mississippi River," and areas of similar extent. As a result, when it has been found afterwards that there existed a group of closely related species not known to the earlier writer, any of which would fill the original description, it. has often been extremely diffi- cult to tell which member of the group was the basis of the proposed name. Even when the early botanists cite a definite locality or region as the source of their specimens it can not always be accepted implicitly as the type locality, because of later changes in the application of geographical names.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Plants for Northern Arizona Landscapes Draft A
    NATIVE PLANTS FOR NORTHERN ARIZONA LANDSCAPES DRAFT A Janice Busco, Horticulturist Cheryl Casey, Assistant Horticulturist Copyright July 27, 2000 The Arboretum at Flagstaff 4001 South Woody Mountain Road Flagstaff, AZ 86001 (520) 774-1442 www.thearb.org 1 HOW TO PRACTICE ENVIRONMENTAL HORTICULTURE Environmental horticulture utilizes an understanding and awareness of your site and the native plants available to you and the landscape features and gardening techniques which will collect and preserve water resources. This approach allows for both natural reproduction of plants and their establishment in the landscape. 1. Know your site, its seasonal fluctuations, natural weather cycles and microclimates. 2. Know the plants and features already present on your site. 3. Use water harvesting techniques—cistern, channeling and contours, planting rings, low spots, etc. 4. Use rocks and mulches to conserve and collect water. 5. Use some higher-water using plants to create shade and create protected zones of higher humidity. 6. Visit natural areas with like microclimates to your site and see how, where and in what combinations native plants occur. Look at native plant gardens and see what you like and what works. Once you know your site and its microclimates, you can use native plants from many different habitats in your landscape. 7. Create a healthy, open soil. Use organic soil amendments such as compost and composted manure tilled into the soil to create an open soil, which will allow water to enter. Organic matter will also help cindery and excessively drained soils hold water. 8. Plant with the seasons. Usually, this means waiting for the monsoon season.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Vascular Plants of the Southern Rocky Mountain Region
    Checklist of Vascular Plants of the Southern Rocky Mountain Region (VERSION 3) NEIL SNOW Herbarium Pacificum Bernice P. Bishop Museum 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, HI 96817 [email protected] Suggested citation: Snow, N. 2009. Checklist of Vascular Plants of the Southern Rocky Mountain Region (Version 3). 316 pp. Retrievable from the Colorado Native Plant Society (http://www.conps.org/plant_lists.html). The author retains the rights irrespective of its electronic posting. Please circulate freely. 1 Snow, N. January 2009. Checklist of Vascular Plants of the Southern Rocky Mountain Region. (Version 3). Dedication To all who work on behalf of the conservation of species and ecosystems. Abbreviated Table of Contents Fern Allies and Ferns.........................................................................................................12 Gymnopserms ....................................................................................................................19 Angiosperms ......................................................................................................................21 Amaranthaceae ............................................................................................................23 Apiaceae ......................................................................................................................31 Asteraceae....................................................................................................................38 Boraginaceae ...............................................................................................................98
    [Show full text]
  • Literaturdatenbank Stand 22.03.2011
    Fakultät Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften Institut für Botanik BIBLIOGRAPHIE AUSZUG AUS DER PROJEKTBEZOGENEN LITERATURDATENBANK Adresse Bearbeiter: Claudia Walczak , Frank Richter Fakultät Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften Telefon: 0351 463 34239 Institut für Botanik Fax: 0351 463 37032 TUDRESDEN Dresden , 15.03.2011 E-Mail: [email protected]; [email protected] 01062 Dresden homepage: http://tu-dresden.de/bio/epobs Erhaltungsprojekt für seltene Pflanzen des Offenlandes in Böhmen und Sachsen Projekt na zachování populací vzácných rostlin bezlesého prostředí v Čechách a Sasku Literaturdatenbank – 15.03.2011 TU Dresden - Fakultät Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften - Institut für Botanik INHALTSVERZEICHNIS Antennaria dioica .......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Calamagrostis phragmitoides ................................................................................................................................................. 10 Carex pulicaris ................................................................................................................................................................................ 12 Carlina acaulis subsp. caulescens (subsp. simplex) ....................................................................................................... 16 Dactylorhiza sambucina ............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Name (Heading 1)
    BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT/EVALUATI ON, NON-NATIVE SPECIES RISK ASSESSMENT, WILDLIFE AND BOTANY REPORTS, and MANAGEMENT INDICATOR SPECIES EVALUATIONS for the RATTLESNAKE MOUNTAIN OHV TRAILS PROJECT Mountaintop Ranger District San Bernardino National Forest Botany Sections Prepared by: /s/ Scott Eliason November 12, 2015 Scott Eliason, District Botanist Date Wildlife Sections Prepared by: /s/ Drew Farr November 12, 2015 Drew Farr, Wildlife Biologist Date Wildlife Sections Reviewed by: /s/ David Austin November 12, 2015 David Austin (Forest Biologist) /s/ Robin Eliason November 12, 2015 Robin Eliason (Mountaintop District Biologist) Page 1 SUMMARY This report addresses the potential effects of the proposed project on Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive species; San Bernardino National Forest Watch list species; non-native invasive species; Management Indicator Species; general vegetation, and general wildlife that are known or likely to occur in the Rattlesnake Mountain Off-Highway Vehicle (OHV) trail analysis area. The proposal is to designate 8.1 miles of OHV routes and restore approximately 25 miles of unauthorized routes in the Rattlesnake Mountain area of the Mountaintop Ranger District. The proposed Rattlesnake Mountain OHV trails are located entirely on National Forest System lands on the San Bernardino National Forest. Table 1 displays the known and potential occurrences of special status species in the analysis area and summarizes the “Determinations of Effects” for each. Federally-Listed Wildlife Species and Designated Critical Habitat There are no known occurrences or suitable habitat for any federally-Threatened/Endangered (T/E) wildlife species in or near the analysis area and federal action area (Table 1). No proposed or designated Critical Habitat for any animals occurs within the analysis area or with the range of potential effects.
    [Show full text]