DOCSLIB.ORG

MSFD Advice Document on Good Environmental Status

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MSFD Advice Document on Good Environmental Status MSFD Advice document on Good environmental status - Descriptor 8: Contaminants A living document - Version of 2 March 2012 Approaches to determining good environmental status, setting of environmental targets and selecting indicators for Marine Strategy Framework Directive descriptor 8 Hazardous Substances Series 2012 Advice and Background Document on Contaminants (MSFD Descriptor 8) OSPAR Convention Convention OSPAR The Convention for the Protection of the La Convention pour la protection du milieu Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic marin de l'Atlantique du Nord-Est, dite (the “OSPAR Convention”) was opened for Convention OSPAR, a été ouverte à la signature at the Ministerial Meeting of the signature à la réunion ministérielle des former Oslo and Paris Commissions in Paris anciennes Commissions d'Oslo et de Paris, on 22 September 1992. The Convention à Paris le 22 septembre 1992. La Convention entered into force on 25 March 1998. The est entrée en vigueur le 25 mars 1998. Contracting Parties are Belgium, Denmark, the Les Parties contractantes sont l'Allemagne, European Union, Finland, France, Germany, la Belgique, le Danemark, l’Espagne, la Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Finlande, la France, l’Irlande, l’Islande, le Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland Luxembourg, la Norvège, les Pays-Bas, le and the United Kingdom. Portugal, le Royaume-Uni de Grande Bretagne et d’Irlande du Nord, la Suède, la Suisse et l’Union européenne. Version of 2 March 2012 Prepared by the OSPAR Committee of Hazardous Substances and Eutrophication (HASEC) Disclaimer This Advice Document is a living document and reflects the state of discussion at expert level at the time of its drafting. The document is of a non-binding nature and aims at facilitating coordination between EU Member States that are parties to the OSPAR Convention, with regard to developing indicators and targets for MSFD Descriptor 8. It does not prejudice the ongoing decision making process in Contracting Parties and their final conclusions in 2012. 2 OSPAR Commission 2012 Contents Advice Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 4 Background Document: ...................................................................................................................................... 6 OSPAR MSFD Advice Document on Contaminants (MSFD Descriptor 8) ........................................................ 6 1. What we found in the Quality Status Report – our “baseline”. .................................................................... 7 2. OSPAR work on hazardous substances will substantially help Member States to address the requirements of the Directive ...................................................................................................................... 7 3. Specific OSPAR contribution to targets and indicators arising from Commission Decision 2010/447/EU ............................................................................................................................................... 7 3.1 General EU requirements .................................................................................................................. 7 3.2 Concentration of contaminants .......................................................................................................... 8 3.3 Effects of contaminants ...................................................................................................................... 9 3.4 Occurrence, origin and extent of significant acute pollution events (e.g. slicks from oil and oil products) ...................................................................................................................................... 10 4. Other data available that may be relevant for targets and indicators ....................................................... 12 5. Addressing the issue of geographic scale ................................................................................................ 14 6. Links with other descriptors ...................................................................................................................... 14 7. Gaps in knowledge and issues in need for addressing ............................................................................ 15 Annex 1: Overview of substances prioritised by OSPAR, HELCOM and WFD and coverage by OSPAR and HELCOM monitoring programmes ............................................................................................. 17 Annex 2: Biological effects monitoring .............................................................................................................. 20 Annex 3: Current work related to oil under OSPAR and other international organisations .............................. 21 3 Advice and Background Document on Contaminants (MSFD Descriptor 8) Advice Summary Summary of common approach toward indicators and targets for GES 8 The following table show the GES indicators and the advice on parameters, assessment criteria and preferred approach. Colours indicate the level of consensus between OSPAR CPs: Green = high; Orange = some; Red = none; black = not enough information Criterion Indicator Parameter Assessment Monitoring Advice/consideration criteria 8.1 8.1.1 Substances Associated CEMP There is good (in biota and EACs consensus between Concentrations Concentrations of sediment) Contracting Parties on of contaminants measured listed in the the approach to this contaminants in relevant matrix (such CEMP indicator. Further as biota, sediment and EACs are currently water) in a way that Proposed under consideration, ensure comparability monitoring of but further thought is with the assessments substances needed about the under Directive in seabird extent to which EQS 2000/60/EC eggs values proposed in the recent revision of the WFD and EQS Directives will be suitable for coastal and marine waters 8.2 8.2.1 Imposex in Index (VSDI CEMP Only TBT-specific gastropods classes) effect is in the CEMP; Effects of Levels of pollution other effects Contaminants effects on the Biological Available, not Pre-CEMP measurements are in ecosystem components effects yet formally the pre-CEMP. It concerned, having techniques agreed would be necessary to regard to the selected developed by see how any effects biological processes OSPAR/ICES targets can and taxonomic groups supplement EACs and where a cause/effect could be related to relationship has been Birds found Voluntary measures established and needs Proportion of dead or dying monitoring to be measured oiled from oil programmes common pollution on of nature guillemots identified conservation (or other beach areas groups relevant bird species) 4 OSPAR Commission 2012 8.2.2 Risk analysis Occurrence Reports in the Incidents involving methods and and extent of framework of spills from ships Occurrence, origin, sufficient significant appropriate carrying oil and other extent of significant emergency acute pollution international hazardous acute pollution events preparedness events organisations substances, and from (e.g. slicks from oil and and response prevented or e.g. Bonn industrial installations oil products) and their capacity in minimised to Agreement at sea or in coastal impact on biota place for limit risks of and under EU areas, which can physically affected by dealing with accidental Seveso II either be large or this pollution acute pollution pollution Directive small, short-lived or events long-term, generally result from accidents. Best addressed by Member States, Bonn Agreement or IMO. 5 Advice and Background Document on Contaminants (MSFD Descriptor 8) Background Document: OSPAR MSFD Advice Document on Contaminants (MSFD Descriptor 8) 1. What we found in the Quality Status Report – our “baseline”. .................................................................... 7 2. OSPAR work on hazardous substances will substantially help Member States to address the requirements of the Directive ...................................................................................................................... 7 3. Specific OSPAR contribution to targets and indicators arising from Commission Decision 2010/447/EU ............................................................................................................................................... 7 3.1 General EU requirements .................................................................................................................. 7 3.2 Concentration of contaminants .......................................................................................................... 8 3.3 Effects of contaminants ...................................................................................................................... 9 3.4 Occurrence, origin and extent of significant acute pollution events (e.g. slicks from oil and oil products) ............................................................................................................................... 10 4. Other data available that may be relevant for targets and indicators ....................................................... 12 5. Addressing the issue of geographic scale ................................................................................................ 14 6. Links with other descriptors ...................................................................................................................... 14 7.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Evaluation of Turkish Mine Waste Management Policy with Respect to Marine Pollution
    © by PSP Volume 26 – No. 10/2017 pages 6149-6158 Fresenius Environmental Bulletin EVALUATION OF TURKISH MINE WASTE MANAGEMENT POLICY WITH RESPECT TO MARINE POLLUTION Esin Esen* SRK Consulting Turan Gunes Bulvari No: 86/3, 06550 Yildiz, Ankara Turkey ABSTRACT Large volumes of wastes are produced by the mining activities and mine waste management is one of the most important environmental issues which di- rectly affect the feasibility of the mine related to per- mitting. The slurries or waste materials left over after mineral is extracted from ore via physico-chemical processing are called tailings which must be safely disposed to prevent the release of contaminates into the environment. Tailings are generally stored on- land surface impoundments; can be used in backfill- ing the voids in exhausted underground mines and/or transferred through pipes and disposed to a water- course under the water level subaqueously. In deep sea tailings placement (DSTP) method, the tailings FIGURE 1 are disposed to deep sea zones far from the shore. General Flow Scheme for Mining [8] The environmental legislations are improving, forc- ing the mining industry to take strict measures re- Tailings may contain suspended solid particles garding tailings management. The Turkish Regula- consisting of economically worthless minerals and a tion on Mining Wastes have been published in 2015 small amount of valuable minerals, dissolved solids, and is going to be in force by July 15, 2017 where metal ions, chemical reactives and reaction products DSTP is adressed as a possibility for non-hazardous [9]. The heavy metals, which are important in terms wastes disposed to anoxic layer of Black Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Litt Er Regional Action Plan
    Marine Litter Regional Action Plan Marine Litter 1 Regional Action Plan for Prevention and Management of Marine Litter in the North-East Atlantic This Regional Action Plan (RAP) sets out the policy context for OSPAR’s work on marine litter, describes the various types of actions that OSPAR will work on over the coming years and provides a timetable to guide the achievement of these actions. The RAP is organised in four sections: SECTION I follows the brief introduction below and sets the objectives, the geographical scope, principles and approaches that should frame implementation. SECTION II presents the actions to be implemented. The actions have been grouped in four themes as follows: A. the reduction of litter from sea-based sources and B. the reduction of litter from land- based sources, C. the removal of existing litter from the marine environment and D. education and outreach on the topic of marine litter. SECTION III describes the necessary monitoring and assessment. SECTION IV outlines how the plan will be implemented and followed up by OSPAR. 2 © Eleanor Partridge/Marine Photobank Marine Litter Marine litter covers any solid material which has been deliberately discarded, or unintentionally lost on beaches and on shores or at sea, including materials transported into the marine environment from land by rivers, draining or sewage systems or winds. It includes any persistent, manufactured or processed solid material. Marine litter originates from different sea- and land-based sources and is largely based on the prevailing production and consumption pattern. Marine litter consists of a wide range of materials, including plastic, metal, wood, rubber, glass and paper.
    [Show full text]
  • The Convention for the Protection of the Marine
    The Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic (the “OSPAR Convention”) was opened for signature at the Ministerial Meeting of the former Oslo and Paris Commissions in Paris on 22 September 1992. The Convention entered into force on 25 March 1998. It has been ratified by Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom and approved by the European Union and Spain. La Convention pour la protection du milieu marin de l'Atlantique du Nord-Est, dite Convention OSPAR, a été ouverte à la signature à la réunion ministérielle des anciennes Commissions d'Oslo et de Paris, à Paris le 22 septembre 1992. La Convention est entrée en vigueur le 25 mars 1998. La Convention a été ratifiée par l'Allemagne, la Belgique, le Danemark, la Finlande, la France, l’Irlande, l’Islande, le Luxembourg, la Norvège, les Pays-Bas, le Portugal, le Royaume-Uni de Grande Bretagne et d’Irlande du Nord, la Suède et la Suisse et approuvée par l’Espagne et l'Union européenne. © OSPAR Commission, 2000. Updated 2004. Permission may be granted by the publishers for the report to be wholly or partly reproduced in publications provided that the source of the extract is clearly indicated. © Commission OSPAR, 2000. Mise à jour 2004. La reproduction de tout ou partie de ce rapport dans une publication peut être autorisée par l’Editeur, sous réserve que l’origine de l’extrait soit clairement mentionnée. ISBN 0 946956 54 5 OSPAR Commission 2000 (2004 Update) OSPAR Background Document on Mercury and Organic Mercury Compounds Contents Secretariat Note: ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impact of Oil and Gas Activities Other Than Pollution
    Offshore Industry Series --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Environmental Impact of Oil and Gas Activities other than Pollution OSPAR Commission 2004 OSPAR Commission, 2004: Background Document on Environmental Impact of Oil and Gas Activities other than Pollution _____________________________________________________________________________________________ The Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic (the “OSPAR Convention”) was opened for signature at the Ministerial Meeting of the former Oslo and Paris Commissions in Paris on 22 September 1992. The Convention entered into force on 25 March 1998. It has been ratified by Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom and approved by the European Community and Spain. La Convention pour la protection du milieu marin de l'Atlantique du Nord-Est, dite Convention OSPAR, a été ouverte à la signature à la réunion ministérielle des anciennes Commissions d'Oslo et de Paris, à Paris le 22 septembre 1992. La Convention est entrée en vigueur le 25 mars 1998. La Convention a été ratifiée par l'Allemagne, la Belgique, le Danemark, la Finlande, la France, l’Irlande, l’Islande, le Luxembourg, la Norvège, les Pays-Bas, le Portugal, le Royaume-Uni de Grande Bretagne et d’Irlande du Nord, la Suède et la Suisse et approuvée par la Communauté européenne et l’Espagne. © OSPAR Commission, 2004. Permission may be granted by the publishers for the report to be wholly or partly reproduced in publications provided that the source of the extract is clearly indicated. © Commission OSPAR, 2004. La reproduction de tout ou partie de ce rapport dans une publication peut être autorisée par l’Editeur, sous réserve que l’origine de l’extrait soit clairement mentionnée.
    [Show full text]
  • OSPAR Convention
    www.ospar.org OSPAR STRATEGY ON THE OFFSHORE OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY Dr Luisa Rodriguez-Lucas, Deputy Secretary, OSPAR Commission UNEP/MAP. 1st Offshore Protocol Working Group Meeting Malta, Valletta, 13-14 June 2013 OSPAR Commission 16 Contracting Parties • Belgium • Denmark • Finland • France • Germany • Iceland • Ireland • Luxembourg • The Netherlands • Norway • Portugal OSPAR Maritime Area and Regions: • Spain Region I: Arctic Waters • Sweden Region II: Greater North Sea • Switzerland Region III: Celtic Seas • The United Kingdom Region IV: Bay of Biscay/Iberian Coast • European Union Region V: Wider Atlantic www.ospar.org OSPAR Convention The Oslo Convention The Paris (1972) Convention (1974) The Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic (OSPAR Convention,1992) Administered by an intergovernmental organisation: The OSPAR Commission www.ospar.org OSPAR Convention Main Objectives The Contracting Parties shall, in accordance with the provisions of the Convention, take all possible steps to prevent and eliminate pollution and shall take the necessary measures to protect the maritime area against the adverse effects of human activities so as to safeguard human health and to conserve marine ecosystems and, when practicable, restore marine areas which have been adversely affected” (Article 1.a) Guiding Principles • Ecosystem Approach • Precautionary Principle • Polluter Pays principle • Best Available Techniques (BAT) and Best Environmental Practices (BEP) www.ospar.org OSPAR Convention/Barcelona Convention
    [Show full text]
  • OSPAR Commission 2003 OSPAR Commission, 2003: Legal Regulations and Legal Instruments to Achieve the Management Objectives in OSPAR Marine Protected Areas ______
    Biodiversity Series --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Background document on the Legal regulations and legal instruments to achieve the management objectives in OSPAR Marine Protected Areas OSPAR Commission 2003 OSPAR Commission, 2003: Legal regulations and legal instruments to achieve the management objectives in OSPAR Marine Protected Areas _____________________________________________________________________________________ The Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic (the “OSPAR Convention”) was opened for signature at the Ministerial Meeting of the former Oslo and Paris Commissions in Paris on 22 September 1992. The Convention entered into force on 25 March 1998. It has been ratified by Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom and approved by the European Community and Spain. La Convention pour la protection du milieu marin de l'Atlantique du nord-est, dite Convention OSPAR, a été ouverte à la signature à la réunion ministérielle des anciennes Commissions d'Oslo et de Paris, à Paris le 22 septembre 1992. La Convention est entrée en vigueur le 25 mars 1998. La Convention a été ratifiée par l'Allemagne, la Belgique, le Danemark, la Finlande, la France, l’Irlande, l’Islande, le Luxembourg, la Norvège, les Pays-Bas, le Portugal, le Royaume-Uni de Grande Bretagne et d’Irlande du Nord, la Suède et la Suisse et approuvée par la Communauté européenne et l’Espagne. © OSPAR Commission, 2003. Permission may be granted by the publishers for the report to be wholly or partly reproduced in publications provided that the source of the extract is clearly indicated. © Commission OSPAR, 2003. La reproduction de tout ou partie de ce rapport dans une publication peut être autorisée par l’Editeur, sous réserve que l’origine de l’extrait soit clairement mentionnée.
    [Show full text]
  • OSPAR Pilot Project on Monitoring Marine Beach Litter
    OSPAR Pilot Project on Monitoring Marine Beach Litter Monitoring of marine litter in the OSPAR region Biodiversity Series 2007 OSPAR Commission, 2007: Monitoring of marine litter on beaches in the OSPAR region ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic (the “OSPAR Convention”) was opened for signature at the Ministerial Meeting of the former Oslo and Paris Commissions in Paris on 22 September 1992. The Convention entered into force on 25 March 1998. It has been ratified by Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom and approved by the European Community and Spain. La Convention pour la protection du milieu marin de l'Atlantique du Nord-Est, dite Convention OSPAR, a été ouverte à la signature à la réunion ministérielle des anciennes Commissions d'Oslo et de Paris, à Paris le 22 septembre 1992. La Convention est entrée en vigueur le 25 mars 1998. La Convention a été ratifiée par l'Allemagne, la Belgique, le Danemark, la Finlande, la France, l’Irlande, l’Islande, le Luxembourg, la Norvège, les Pays-Bas, le Portugal, le Royaume-Uni de Grande Bretagne et d’Irlande du Nord, la Suède et la Suisse et approuvée par la Communauté européenne et l’Espagne. Cover page photo: Finn Lornsen, one of the German beach surveyors, on the Sylt island reference beach. Photo courtesy of the German participants in the OSPAR pilot project. Maps of reference beaches (pp. 26 and 63): © Stig Söderlind. 2 OSPAR Commission, 2007: Monitoring of marine litter on beaches in the OSPAR region ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PREFACE 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / RÉCAPITULATIF 6 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Contracting Parties’ Implementation Reports on PARCOM Decision 92/3 on the Phasing out of Pcbs and Hazardous PCB Substitutes
    Hazardous Substances Series Assessment of Contracting Parties’ Implementation Reports on PARCOM Decision 92/3 on the Phasing Out of PCBs and Hazardous PCB Substitutes OSPAR Commission (2002) 1 OSPAR Commission Assessment of implementation of PARCOM Decision 92/3 Prepared by Germany and published in 2002 The Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic (the “OSPAR Convention”) was opened for signature at the Ministerial Meeting of the former Oslo and Paris Commissions in Paris on 22 September 1992. The Convention entered into force on 25 March 1998. It has been ratified by Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom and approved by the European Community and Spain. La Convention pour la protection du milieu marin de l'Atlantique du nord-est, dite Convention OSPAR, a été ouverte à la signature à la réunion ministérielle des anciennes Commissions d'Oslo et de Paris, à Paris le 22 septembre 1992. La Convention est entrée en vigueur le 25 mars 1998. La Convention a été ratifiée par l'Allemagne, la Belgique, le Danemark, la Finlande, la France, l’Irlande, l’Islande, le Luxembourg, la Norvège, les Pays-Bas, le Portugal, le Royaume-Uni de Grande Bretagne et d’Irlande du Nord, la Suède et la Suisse et approuvée par la Communauté européenne et l’Espagne. © OSPAR Commission, 2002. Permission may be granted by the publishers for the report to be wholly or partly reproduced in publications provided that the source of the extract is clearly indicated. © Commission OSPAR, 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • The Synergy of Chemical Conventions; Opportunities and Obstacles - an NGO Perspective
    The Synergy of Chemical Conventions; Opportunities and Obstacles - an NGO Perspective For many public interest non-government organizations (NGOs), the challenge of effective synergistic implementation of the chemical conventions is far from simply a policy issue. The growing urgency of the chemical body burden in humans and wildlife require us to support initiatives to improve chemical management and reduce the global chemical load. Chemical contamination of the environment shows no respect for territorial borders and therefore countries on their own, cannot respond effectively. The coordinated implementation of chemical multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs) can provide real opportunities for full life cycle management of chemicals at a national, regional and international level. There are opportunities for coordination and harmonization in policy, information management, technical skills, capacity building and training, as well as legislation. The synergy between the chemical MEAs is one way of building effective international and regional frameworks to minimise and prevent the impacts of toxic chemicals and hazardous waste. This paper will provide an NGO perspective on the interlinkages and synergies between the chemical conventions and the obstacles to their combined implementation. It makes recommendations in priority areas for international capacity building initiatives and provides` a South Pacific case study in legislative synergies. The paper draws on the experience of the authors1 in capacity building initiatives and legislative development in chemical management, in Australia, the Pacific region and internationally. While it outlines the benefits of synergy, it will also focus on the challenges faced by countries attempting the combined implementation of a selection of international or regional chemical instruments. Priority International Chemical Instruments There are many chemical conventions and agreements to consider, both internationally and regionally.
    [Show full text]
  • Pentachlorophenol OSPAR Commission
    Hazardous Substances Series --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pentachlorophenol OSPAR Commission 2001 (2004 Update) OSPAR Commission, 2001: Pentachlorophenol __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic (the “OSPAR Convention”) was opened for signature at the Ministerial Meeting of the former Oslo and Paris Commissions in Paris on 22 September 1992. The Convention entered into force on 25 March 1998. It has been ratified by Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom and approved by the European Community and Spain. La Convention pour la protection du milieu marin de l'Atlantique du Nord-Est, dite Convention OSPAR, a été ouverte à la signature à la réunion ministérielle des anciennes Commissions d'Oslo et de Paris, à Paris le 22 septembre 1992. La Convention est entrée en vigueur le 25 mars 1998. La Convention a été ratifiée par l'Allemagne, la Belgique, le Danemark, la Finlande, la France, l’Irlande, l’Islande, le Luxembourg, la Norvège, les Pays-Bas, le Portugal, le Royaume-Uni de Grande Bretagne et d’Irlande du Nord, la Suède et la Suisse et approuvée par la Communauté européenne et l’Espagne. © OSPAR Commission, 2001. Permission may be granted by the publishers for the report to be wholly
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Litt Er Regional Action Plan
    Marine Litter Regional Action Plan Marine Litter 1 Regional Action Plan for Prevention and Management of Marine Litter in the North-East Atlantic This Regional Action Plan (RAP) sets out the policy context for OSPAR’s work on marine litter, describes the various types of actions that OSPAR will work on over the coming years and provides a timetable to guide the achievement of these actions. The RAP is organised in four sections: SECTION I follows the brief introduction below and sets the objectives, the geographical scope, principles and approaches that should frame implementation. SECTION II presents the actions to be implemented. The actions have been grouped in four themes as follows: A. the reduction of litter from sea-based sources and B. the reduction of litter from land- based sources, C. the removal of existing litter from the marine environment and D. education and outreach on the topic of marine litter. SECTION III describes the necessary monitoring and assessment. SECTION IV outlines how the plan will be implemented and followed up by OSPAR. This final section includes reference to Annex I, consisting of an Implementation Plan for the development and adoption of OSPAR’s measures supporting the implementation of OSPAR actions in this agreement and Annex II which outlines an implementation reporting format through which OSPAR’s Contracting Parties, and also OSPAR’s relevant stakeholders and observers, are invited to report on implementation. These annexes are to be considered part of this RAP, however the RAP Implementation plan will be updated annually based upon progress. 2 © Eleanor Partridge/Marine Photobank Marine Litter Marine litter covers any solid material which has been deliberately discarded, or unintentionally lost on beaches and on shores or at sea, including materials transported into the marine environment from land by rivers, draining or sewage systems or winds.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation of PARCOM Decision 92/3 on the Phasing out of Pcbs and Hazardous PCB Substitutes
    Hazardous Substances Series ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Overview Assessment: Implementation of PARCOM Decision 92/3 on the Phasing Out of PCBs and Hazardous PCB Substitutes OSPAR Commission 2006 OSPAR Commission, 2006: Overview assessment of Implementation of PARCOM Decision 92/3 The Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic (the “OSPAR Convention”) was opened for signature at the Ministerial Meeting of the former Oslo and Paris Commissions in Paris on 22 September 1992. The Convention entered into force on 25 March 1998. It has been ratified by Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom and approved by the European Community and Spain. La Convention pour la protection du milieu marin de l'Atlantique du Nord-Est, dite Convention OSPAR, a été ouverte à la signature à la réunion ministérielle des anciennes Commissions d'Oslo et de Paris, à Paris le 22 septembre 1992. La Convention est entrée en vigueur le 25 mars 1998. La Convention a été ratifiée par l'Allemagne, la Belgique, le Danemark, la Finlande, la France, l’Irlande, l’Islande, le Luxembourg, la Norvège, les Pays-Bas, le Portugal, le Royaume-Uni de Grande Bretagne et d’Irlande du Nord, la Suède et la Suisse et approuvée par la Communauté européenne et l’Espagne. © OSPAR Commission, 2006. Permission may be granted by the publishers for the report to be wholly or partly reproduced in publications provided that the source of the extract is clearly indicated. © Commission OSPAR, 2006. La reproduction de tout ou partie de ce rapport dans une publication peut être autorisée par l’Editeur, sous réserve que l’origine de l’extrait soit clairement mentionnée.
    [Show full text]