DOCSLIB.ORG

British Waterways: Follow-Up

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
British Waterways: Follow-Up House of Commons Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee British Waterways: follow-up Eighth Report of Session 2007–08 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 18 June 2008 HC 438 Published on 1 July 2008 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee The Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and its associated bodies. Current membership Mr Michael Jack (Conservative, Fylde) (Chairman) Mr Geoffrey Cox (Conservative, Torridge & West Devon) Mr David Drew (Labour, Stroud) Mr James Gray (Conservative, North Wiltshire) Patrick Hall (Labour, Bedford) Lynne Jones (Labour, Birmingham, Selly Oak) David Lepper (Labour, Brighton Pavilion) Miss Anne McIntosh (Conservative, Vale of York) Mr Dan Rogerson (Liberal Democrat, North Cornwall) Sir Peter Soulsby (Labour, Leicester South) Dr Gavin Strang (Labour, Edinburgh East) David Taylor (Labour, North West Leicestershire) Paddy Tipping (Labour, Sherwood) Mr Roger Williams (Liberal Democrat, Brecon & Radnorshire) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No. 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/efracom Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Chris Stanton (Clerk), Nerys Welfoot (Second Clerk), Sarah Coe (Committee Specialist—Environment), Marek Kubala and Joanna Dodd (Inquiry Managers), Andy Boyd and Briony Potts (Committee Assistants) and Mandy Sullivan (Secretary). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee, House of Commons, 7 Millbank, London SW1P 3JA. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 5774; the Committee’s e-mail address is: [email protected]. Media inquiries should be addressed to Laura Kibby on 020 7219 0718. British Waterways: follow-up 1 Contents Report Page Summary 3 1 Introduction 5 The EFRA Committee inquiry in 2007 5 This follow-up inquiry 5 British Waterways 7 Funding of British Waterways 7 2 BW’s relationship with Defra and other Government departments 10 The new “Strategic Steer” from Defra to BW and the “Deal” between them 10 Defra’s priorities for BW 10 BW’s Corporate Plan 11 Interdepartmental Working Group 11 British Waterways budget for 2008–09 13 British Waterways Status Options Review 15 3 British Waterways’ regeneration and restoration work 17 Benefits of waterside development 17 Regeneration and the expansion of BW’s network 17 Restoration 18 BW’s withdrawal from the Cotswold Canals restoration project 20 History of the restoration project 20 British Waterways’ decision to withdraw from the Cotswold Canals Partnership 21 Reaction to BW’s decision 23 Defra’s view 24 Our views 25 BW’s decision to withdraw from the Cotswold Canals Partnership 26 4 Conclusion 27 Conclusions and recommendations 28 Formal Minutes 30 Witnesses 31 List of written evidence 31 List of unprinted evidence 34 List of Reports from the Committee during the current Parliament 35 British Waterways: follow-up 3 Summary In summer 2007 we reported on British Waterways (BW). We urged the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) to ensure adequate funding of the waterways network under the Comprehensive Spending Review. We also expressed concern at the poor relations that existed at the time between Defra and BW. We were prompted to examine this subject again by BW’s decision in February 2008 to withdraw from the partnership to restore the Cotswold Canals so as to be able to fund urgent repairs to the Monmouthshire and Brecon Canal. We decided to focus on BW’s regeneration and restoration work, but we have also received evidence on how Defra and BW are working together. We are encouraged by the work BW and Defra have done since summer 2007 to improve and clarify their relationship. The strategic guidance to the BW Board from the Department reflects the importance the Government attaches to BW maintaining the existing network. They have undertaken to communicate effectively with each other, and have agreed how they will work together. These are important steps forward. We welcome too the establishment of a group within Whitehall to bring together all the government departments with an interest in BW’s work. BW received slightly more financial support from Defra than it expected from the Comprehensive Spending Review. While not enough to avoid underspending on its major works programme, in the present climate the settlement is acceptable. BW’s property development work produces a substantial proportion of its commercial income. But restoration of canals produces little if any direct benefit to BW, and BW has often carried all the financial risk in such projects. Canal restoration schemes can be of great value to the areas where the canals are restored, producing knock-on benefits such as more jobs and visitor income. What BW’s decision on the Cotswold Canals demonstrates is that it is not reasonable to expect a BW Board charged primarily with maintaining the existing waterways network to take on substantial risk from such projects, especially in present economic conditions. If the public sector wishes to obtain external benefits from canal restoration schemes, the bodies responsible for obtaining those benefits should bear the risk. Defra, with British Waterways and other interested government departments and public bodies, should develop a mechanism to score and prioritise public investment in canal restoration according to the external benefits that would be created, and should agree how the financial risks of such projects should be borne. British Waterways: follow-up 5 1 Introduction The EFRA Committee inquiry in 2007 1. Last year, the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee inquired into the work of British Waterways (BW). Our terms of reference were to examine how BW was working towards its ambition of creating “an expanded, vibrant, largely self-sufficient waterway network”, in the context of the policies set out by the Government in its 2000 document, Waterways for Tomorrow, the 2004–05 policy review of British Waterways, and recent changes in Defra’s budget. 2. We reported in July 2007. We commended the commitment of Government, BW and individuals over the past decade to improving the waterways network, and their success in doing so. We said that the waterways network was a vital public asset, and that the Government had a responsibility to keep it in good order. We were concerned at the implications of likely lower Defra grant levels in the Comprehensive Spending Review 2007 period, from 2008–09 to 2010–11, on BW’s ability to maintain the waterways network to an acceptable standard. We recommended that BW and Defra work together closely to agree a CSR 07 settlement that ensured the long-term stability of the waterways network. We expected Defra to consider carefully BW’s claim that additional capital funding would be necessary for each year of the CSR 07 period if its grant settlement continued to reduce in real terms. We considered it imperative that BW was granted every opportunity to deliver strategies that could help generate more of its own income. 3. Our inquiry showed that relations between BW and its sponsor department in England and Wales, Defra, had been tense, and that communication between Defra and BW needed to be improved. This follow-up inquiry 4. On 4 February 2008 BW announced that with effect from April 2008 it was withdrawing from the Cotswold Canals Partnership, a collaboration with other partners including Stroud District Council, the South West England Regional Development Agency, the European Union, Gloucestershire County Council, the Waterway Trust and the Cotswold Canals Trust. The Partnership’s aim is to restore the Stroudwater Navigation (7 miles/12km) and the Thames and Severn Canal (29 miles/46km) to form a link between the Thames and the Severn. BW said that its withdrawal followed a review of funding commitments for the next financial year and the diversion of significant funds to make progress with the urgent first phase of a repair programme for the Monmouthshire & Brecon Canal in Wales, which was expected to cost about £15 million over four years.1 5. We announced on 22 February 2008 that we were reopening last year’s inquiry into British Waterways as follows: 1 BW press release, 4 February 2008 6 British Waterways: follow-up The Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee will hold a one-off evidence session on British Waterways (BW), to follow up its work in this area last year (Seventh Report of Session 2006–07, HC 345–I). The Committee will take oral evidence from both Defra and British Waterways to examine BW’s regeneration and restoration role, with particular reference to BW’s decision to withdraw from the Cotswold Canal Partnership.2 6. We received an unusually high number of memoranda—124. We are very grateful to all those who took the trouble to respond to our call for evidence. 7. Most of the memoranda we received fell into one of three broad categories: • A large number came from BW’s regeneration partners around the country. The great majority expressed satisfaction with BW as a partner and support for BW in its work, and asked us to encourage this to continue. The large number of such responses is partly explained by the fact that BW told us that it had suggested to its partners that they might wish to write to the Committee with their views of their experience of working with BW.3 • Some supported the repair of the Monmouthshire and Brecon Canal.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nottinghamshire's Sustainable Community Strategy
    Nottinghamshire’s Sustainable Community Strategy the nottinghamshire partnership all together better 2010-2020 Contents 1 Foreword 5 2 Introduction 7 3 Nottinghamshire - our vision for 2020 9 4 How we put this strategy together What is this document based on? 11 How this document links with other important documents 11 Our evidence base 12 5 Nottinghamshire - the timeline 13 6 Nottinghamshire today 15 7 Key background issues 17 8 Nottinghamshire’s economy - recession and recovery 19 9 Key strategic challenges 21 10 Our priorities for the future A greener Nottinghamshire 23 A place where Nottinghamshire’s children achieve their full potential 27 A safer Nottinghamshire 33 Health and well-being for all 37 A more prosperous Nottinghamshire 43 Making Nottinghamshire’s communities stronger 47 11 Borough/District community strategies 51 12 Next steps and contacts 57 Nottinghamshire’s Sustainable Community Strategy 2010-2020 l p.3 Appendices I The Nottinghamshire Partnership 59 II Underpinning principles 61 III Our evidence base 63 IV Consultation 65 V Nottinghamshire - the timeline 67 VI Borough/District chapters Ashfield 69 Bassetlaw 74 Broxtowe 79 Gedling 83 Mansfield 87 Newark and Sherwood 92 Rushcliffe 94 VII Case studies 99 VIII Other relevant strategies and action plans 105 IX Performance management - how will we know that we have achieved our targets? 107 X List of acronyms 109 XI Glossary of terms 111 XII Equality impact assessment 117 p.4 l Nottinghamshire’s Sustainable Community Strategy 2010-2020 1 l Foreword This document, the second community strategy for Nottinghamshire, outlines the key priorities for the county over the next ten years.
    [Show full text]
  • Lea Valley Walk Section 5 (Three Mills to Limehouse Basin)
    Lea Valley Walk To reach the start from Bromley-by-Bow station (District Line): Turn Section 5 (Three Mills to Limehouse Basin) left out of the station and at once go under the underpass and come up to pavement level on the far side of the main road. Go right to walk north, then Version 3 : July 2011 turn right down Three Mill Lane. Directions: Having come up the towpath ramp onto Three Mill Lane, turn left to cross the canal, and then turn right down another towpath ramp. There was a mill here in Saxon times, in fact at one stage four mills were Start: Three Mills (TQ382828) here, driven by sea and river water which came up the Lea at high tide. The clock tower dates from about 1750. The mills produced flour until the mid Station: Bromley-by-Bow 1700’s, after which the owners became involved in the manufacture of gin, Finish: Limehouse Basin (TQ362807) calling themselves “millers and malt distillers”. The House Mill is open to visitors on Sunday afternoons in summer (admission fee). The former Station: Limehouse DLR Station Victorian bottling plant (at the far end of the cobbled street) is now a film studio, the first “Big Brother” set was alongside to the east. Distance: 2 miles (3.2 km) Join the towpath again, this time on the other side of the canal. Water is on both sides of the towpath. Go under the London-Southend railway bridge Introduction: Three Mills to Limehouse Basin became Section 5 of the Lea and pass the closed footbridge which crosses over the tidal River Lea to the Valley Walk in July 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Impact of Waterway Restoration
    May Final 2013 A review of the impact of waterway restoration March 2014 Dr Richard Hazenberg & Meanu Bajwa-Patel Directorate of Enterprise, Development & Social Impact University of Northampton A review of the impact of waterway restoration March 2014 Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction .................................................................................................... 7 1.1 – Overview ................................................................................................... 7 2. Waterway Restorations .................................................................................. 9 2.1 - Defining a waterway restoration ............................................................... 9 2.2 – The benefits of waterway restorations ..................................................... 9 2.3 – The Public Services (Social Value) Act .................................................... 11 3. Impact of restorations .................................................................................. 12 3.1 – The economic impacts ............................................................................. 13 3.1.1 – Leisure and tourism ................................................................................... 14 3.1.2 – Employment .............................................................................................. 15 3.1.3 – Housing ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD
    LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD ACC/2423 Reference Description Dates LEE CONSERVANCY BOARD ENGINEER'S OFFICE Engineers' reports and letter books LEE CONSERVANCY BOARD: ENGINEER'S REPORTS ACC/2423/001 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1881 Jan-1883 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/002 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1884 Jan-1886 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/003 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1887 Jan-1889 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/004 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1890 Jan-1893 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/005 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1894 Jan-1896 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/006 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1897 Jan-1899 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/007 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1903 Jan-1903 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/008 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1904 Jan-1904 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/009 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1905 Jan-1905 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/010 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1906 Jan-1906 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 2 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD ACC/2423 Reference Description Dates ACC/2423/011 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1908 Jan-1908 Lea navigation/ stort navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/012 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1912 Jan-1912 Lea navigation/ stort navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/013 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1913 Jan-1913 Lea navigation/ stort navigation
    [Show full text]
  • British Waterways Board General Canal Bye-Laws
    BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD GENERAL CANAL BYE-LAWS 1965 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD BYE-LAWS ____________________ for regulation of the canals belonging to or under the control of the British Waterways Board (other than the canals specified in Bye-law 1) made pursuant to the powers of the British Transport Commission Act, 1954. (N.B. – The sub-headings and marginal notes do not form part of these Bye-laws). Application of Bye-laws Application of 1. These Bye-laws shall apply to every canal or inland navigation in Bye-Laws England and Wales belonging to or under the control of the British Waterways Board except the following canals: - (a) The Lee and Stort Navigation (b) the Gloucester and Sharpness Canal (c) the River Severn Navigation which are more particularly defined in the Schedule hereto. Provided that where the provisions of any of these Bye-laws are limited by such Bye-law to any particular canal or locality then such Bye-law shall apply only to such canal or locality to which it is so limited. These Bye-laws shall come into operation at the expiration of twenty-eight days after their confirmation by the Minister of Transport as from which date all existing Bye-laws applicable to the canals and inland navigations to which these Bye-laws apply (other than those made under the Explosives Act 1875, and the Petroleum (Consolidation) Act 1928) shall cease to have effect, without prejudice to the validity of anything done thereunder or to any liability incurred in respect of any act or omission before the date of coming into operation of these Bye-laws.
    [Show full text]
  • The Navigation of the River Lee (1190 – 1790)
    Edmonton Hundred Historical Society Occasional Paper New Series No. 36 by J.G.L.Burnby and M.Parker. Published 1978 Added to the site by kind permission of Mr Michael Parker THE NAVIGATION OF THE RIVER LEE (1190 – 1790) PREFACE As the men of the river frequently pointed out the Lee is one of the "great rivers of the realm", and it is only fitting that its history should be traced; indeed it is surprising that the task has not been carried out far earlier than this. Regretfully the story of its busiest period in the days of post-canalisation has had to be left to another, later Occasional Paper. The spelling of the name of the river has varied over the centuries. In 1190 it was referred to as "the water of Lin", in the fourteenth century as "La Leye", the cartographer Saxton seems to have been the first to introduce "Lea" to map-makers in 1576, in the eighteenth century it was not infrequently called the "Ware River" but the commonest spelling would seem to be "Lee" and it is to this which we have decided to adhere. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We would like to thank the London Borough of Haringey Libraries panel for their financial assistance in the publication of this paper. Our gratitude also goes to the Marquess of Salisbury for granting permission to reproduce the maps held in the Hatfield House Collection. A number of people have most generously helped us in the production of this paper. Mrs.H.Baker has with her usual expertise drawn the map of the lower reaches of the river, and Mr.Neil Clements is responsible for the charming reproductions of the prints of the Powder Mill at Waltham Abbey and the river at Ware.
    [Show full text]
  • Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs Waterways for Tomorrow
    Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs Waterways for Tomorrow Overview This document follows up the White Paper A New Deal for Transport; Better for Everyone by setting out proposals for the future of our inland waterways - the canals and navigable rivers of England and Wales. The Scottish Executive will consider whether to issue a separate document covering the inland waterways of Scotland. The Government wants to promote the inland waterways, encouraging a modern, integrated and sustainable approach to their use. We want to protect and conserve an important part of our national heritage. At the same time, we want to maximise the opportunities the waterways offer for leisure and recreation; as a catalyst for urban and rural regeneration; for education; and for freight transport. We want to encourage innovative uses such as water transfer and telecommunications. The last major review of the inland waterways was carried out more than thirty years ago. This led to the Transport Act 1968 which recognised that the main role of the nationalised waterways was shifting from transport to amenity and recreational use. Today, all our waterways are more widely appreciated than ever. As well as their recreational and transport roles, the waterways also supply water and have become part of the land drainage system. The system is rich in heritage value and is an important environmental and ecological resource. The waterways stimulate regeneration and are increasingly being used in innovative ways. The system is undergoing a renaissance as more derelict waterways are restored, greater resources are devoted to maintaining the existing system and increased effort is put into maximising the benefits the waterways offer.
    [Show full text]
  • Enforcement Officer Map
    - Enforcement Officer Map SCALE Key 0 10 20 Mls 1. Northwest Waterways 2. Northeast Waterways 3. Manchester & Pennine Waterways Key Enforcement Contact Details 4. East Midlands Waterways Officer 5. North Wales & Borders Waterways 07766992939 A Mike Fletcher 01942 405758 6. Central Shires Waterways [email protected] 7. South Wales & Severn Waterways 07920283688 B Claire Mara 03030 404040 8. West Midlands Waterways [email protected] 9. South East Waterways 07880138637 10. Kennet & Avon Waterways C Victoria Cluer 03030 404040 [email protected] 11. London Waterways 07827843583 D Jamie Redfern 03030 404040 [email protected] Managed by Canal & River Trust 07887626862 E Stuart Garner 01636 675717 [email protected] N A M E Canal & River Trust Offices 07710175412 F Steve Cropper 03030 404040 [email protected] Waterway Boundaries 07879884828 G Dave Tomkinson 01782 215597 Valid On 14th May 2015 [email protected] © Crown copyright and database rights, 2015, Ordnance Survey 100030994 07879694870 H Angela Barnett 03030 404040 [email protected] Newcastle 07803885578 Carlisle I Jim Smith 03030 404040 [email protected] 07771379377 Durham J Annette Vaughan 03030 404040 [email protected] 07710175242 Middlesbrough K Elizabeth Sollars 03030 404040 [email protected] TEES NAVIGATION 07747460693 AND BARRAGE L George Dickinson 01908 681276 1 [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Canal Restoration to Connect Our People and Regenerate Our Communities
    Activity Plan Canal restoration to connect our people and regenerate our communities Section C Version May 2020 Contents Executive Summary 05 2.4.10 Deepening engagement, 48 stimulating social action and Chapter 1: building a sense of ownership Introduction & Overview 2.5 The Main Changes since Round One 51 1.1 Our Activity Plan 12 2.5.1 From Themes to Strategic Aims 51 1.2 Cotswold Canals Connected 13 2.5.2 Timing of the A38/A419 roundabout 51 Project Summary crossing project 1.2.2 Why Here Why Now? 17 2.5.3 Community Hubs 52 2.5.4 Canal Interpretation: 53 Chapter 2: a community-led approach Our Activity Plan 2.5.5 Apprenticeship Programme 53 2.5.6 Nature Conservation 54 2.1 How we developed our plan 23 2.2 Partnership working 26 2.2.1 Building a dynamic and Chapter 3: robust partnership 26 The current situation for our people 2.2.2 Governance & leadership 27 & communities 3.1 Our Place: Geography, 56 People, partnerships & local resilience: 2.3 31 demographics and context Our open approach 3.1.2 Geography & Environment 58 2.3.1 Embedding Community Engagement 31 into all our work 3.1.3 Urban Centres 59 2.4 A creative approach to research 33 3.1.4 Demography & Population 59 & development 3.2 Under-represented people and 61 2.4.1 Our Research Model 33 communities: poverty & deprivation, unemployment, BAME & LGBTQ+ 2.4.2 Assessing the Baseline 35 3.2.1 Poverty and deprivation 61 2.4.3 Community Consultation 36 3.2.2 Black Asian & Minority Ethnic (BAME) 65 Surveys and questionnaires 2.4.4 36 populations 2.4.5 Learning from others 37 3.2.3
    [Show full text]
  • Map of London's Waterways
    LONDON WATERWAYS Bishop’s Stortford A1250 BBISHOP’SISHOP’S STORTFORDSTORTFORD WareWare SouthSouth MillMill LockLock LockLock M11 HertfordHertford LockLock TwyfordTwyford Ware LockLock GreatGreat Hertford A1184 A119 A1060 WWAREARE SpellbrookSpellbrook HallingburyHallingbury HHERTFORDERTFORD EEASTAST LockLock LittleLittle A414 A1170 HardmeadHardmead LockLock HallingburyHallingbury TednamburyTednambury KEY StansteadStanstead LockLock LockLock Managed by British Waterways SSTT MMARGARETSARGARETS SawbridgeworthSawbridgeworth Stanstead SawbridgeworthSawbridgeworth LockLock Canal continues Abbotts RiverRiver SStorttort NavigationNavigation SSAWBRIDGEWORTHAWBRIDGEWORTH Tunnel RROYDONOYDON HarlowHarlow SheeringSheering MillMill LockLock HunsdonHunsdon Eastwick LockLock Other Waterways MillMill LockLock BurntBurnt MillMill FeakesFeakes LockLock WareWare RRYEYE HHOUSEOUSE BrickBrick LockLock LockLock Lock and Lock Name LockLock Feilde’sFeilde’s ParndonParndon HHARLOWARLOW MMILLILL RoydonRoydon LattonLatton LockLock HoddesdonHoddesdon WeirWeir LockLock MillMill LockLock A1169 Parkland LockLock LowerLower LockLock HHARLOWARLOW TTOWNOWN Wetland Harlow A1019 M11 BBROXBOURNEROXBOURNE British Waterways Main Office Dobb’sDobb’s WeirWeir LockLock A414 DOCKLANDS British Waterways Local Office CarthagenaCarthagena LockLock A10 M11 Motorway A10 Main roads NNazeingazeing MarshesMarshes National Rail Station AqueductAqueduct LockLock London Underground Station CheshuntCheshunt LockLock Docklands Light Railway Station CCHESHUNTHESHUNT WalthamWaltham CommonCommon
    [Show full text]
  • Broxtowe Borough Council Play Strategy 2017 – 2025
    Broxtowe Borough Council Play Strategy 2017 – 2025 A strategy to shape the future of children and young people’s play throughout Broxtowe Contents 1 Setting the Scene .............................................................................................................................................4 1.1 Understanding play .................................................................................................................................4 1.11 Types of play. ...........................................................................................................................................4 1.2 Making the Case for Play .........................................................................................................................6 1.3 How the Strategy has been developed ...................................................................................................7 2 Purpose and Scope of the Strategy ..................................................................................................................8 2.1 Why do we need a new Children’s Play Strategy? ..................................................................................8 2.2 Who is the Play Strategy for? ..................................................................................................................8 2.3 How will the Play Strategy be used? .......................................................................................................8 3 The Strategic Context Influencing Play Development ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Just Add Water How Our Inland Waterways Can Do More for Rural Regeneration a Practical Guide - September 2005 96475 2Pp Text.Qxd 17/10/05 09:37 Page 2
    96475 2pp Text.qxd 17/10/05 09:37 Page 1 just add water How our inland waterways can do more for rural regeneration A practical guide - September 2005 96475 2pp Text.qxd 17/10/05 09:37 Page 2 Contents Foreword Foreword 01 In their industrial and commercial heyday, canals and other waterways stimulated trade and economic growth in villages, towns and cities. Today, they are just as Executive Summary 02 powerful at drawing activity and prosperity to our market towns and countryside. The inland waterways are nationally important assets which must be conserved and Introduction 03 developed sustainably to fulfil their maximum potential. They make a significant contribution to the quality of life for millions because they provide beautiful and The Rural Economy and 07 peaceful environments, recreational opportunities and access to the countryside the Inland Waterways for all. Waterways and rural 17 Some 1,500 miles of waterways pass through rural areas. They can provide much regeneration: putting needed employment and a focus for tourism. Small businesses in waterway it all together… settings, marinas and waterway-based tourism provide vital support for rural shops, post offices and pubs. Applying the development 29 I welcome this report by IWAAC. It provides a positive contribution to the development principles of Government policies for the promotion and regeneration of the countryside. It shows how mixed-use “hubs” could be developed adjacent to waterways, Practicalities: A guide 43 to promote rural regeneration and provide links to towns. to implementation I commend the report to local planning authorities, regional development agencies, Appendices 51 navigation authorities and other bodies and individuals able to ensure that our inland waterways play a more valuable role in rural regeneration.
    [Show full text]