DOCSLIB.ORG

Murphys Flat Conservation Area

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Murphys Flat Conservation Area MANAGEMENT STATEMENT 2010 Murphys Flat CONSERVATION AREA Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Murphys Flat Conservation Area Management Statement 201020102010 This management statement applies to the Murphys Flat Conservation Area which is managed under the National Parks and Reserves Management Act 2002 and is subject to the National Parks and Reserves Regulations 2009. The area known locally as Murphys Flat was acquired on 1 May 2001 with the financial assistance of the Commonwealth and State Governments and Norske Skog Boyer Paper Mills. The development of this management statement is a requirement of the acquisition. A draft management statement was prepared and released for public comment from 29 March 2010 until 24 May 2010. The comments were considered and where appropriate, incorporated into this management statement. The management statement has been prepared with the aim of guiding future management activities and to encourage care and interest in the reserve. It describes the reserve and its values and provides strategies and actions which will guide the conservation of the reserve’s natural diversity and cultural values. The Murphys Flat Conservation Area Management Statement was approved on 21 December 2010. It will be implemented by the Parks and Wildlife Service, Southern Region, subject to limitations of funding, staff and resources. Peter Mooney General Manager Tasmania Parks and Wildlife Service National Library of Australia CataloguingCataloguing----inininin----PublicationPublication entry Title: Murphys Flat conservation area management statement 2010 /Parks and Wildlife Service. ISBN: 9780724665617 (pbk.) 9780724665624 (PDF) Notes: Includes bibliographical references and index. Subjects: Natural resources conservation areas--Tasmania--Murphys Flat. Conservation Area--Management. Conservation of natural resources--Tasmania--Murphys Flat Conservation Area--Management. Murphys Flat Conservation Area (Tas.)--Management. Other Authors/Contributors: Tasmania. Parks and Wildlife Service. Tasmania. Dept. of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment. Dewey Number: 333.7316099462 Published by: Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, GPO Box 1751 Hobart, Tasmania 7001 Cite as: Parks and Wildlife Service (2010), Murphys Flat Conservation Area Management Statement, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Hobart. Cover photo: Saline sedgeland with coastal juncus (Juncus kraussii), Murphys Flat Conservation Area (Lynne Sparrow) © Parks and Wildlife Service, Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, 2010 ContentsContentsContents 111 SummarySummarySummary ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 111 222 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 222 2.1 Purpose of this Management Statement .......................................................................................... 2 2.2 General Details ................................................................................................................................................ 2 2.3 Reservation History ....................................................................................................................................... 3 2.4 Management History .................................................................................................................................... 3 2.5 Challenges ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 333 Reserve Management Framework ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................444 3.1 Legislation ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 3.2 Tasmanian Reserve Management Code of Practice 2003 .................................................... 5 3.3 Key Desired Outcomes .............................................................................................................................. 5 3.4 Strategic Asset Management ................................................................................................................... 5 444 Conservation of Reserve Values ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 666 4.1 Vulnerability to Sea Level Rise................................................................................................................ 6 4.2 Geodiversity ....................................................................................................................................................... 6 4.3 Hydrology and Water Quality................................................................................................................ 7 4.4 Native Vegetation .......................................................................................................................................... 9 4.5 Native Fauna ..................................................................................................................................................... 12 4.6 Aboriginal Heritage ....................................................................................................................................... 14 4.7 History and Historic Heritage ................................................................................................................. 14 555 Reserve Protection Programs ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 161616 5.1 Access and Signs ............................................................................................................................................. 16 5.2 Weed Management ...................................................................................................................................... 17 5.3 Fire Management ............................................................................................................................................ 19 5.4 Introduced Fauna ............................................................................................................................................ 19 666 Visitors and the Community ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 202020 6.1 Visitors and Recreational Opportunities .......................................................................................... 20 6.2 Visitor Safety ...................................................................................................................................................... 20 6.3 Engaging and Informing the Community .......................................................................................... 21 6.4 Research............................................................................................................................................................... 21 777 Effectiveness Monitoring and Plan Review ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 222222 888 ReferencesReferencesReferences .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 232323 999 AppendicesAppendicesAppendices ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Plant Common Name Scientific Name Description of Plant Picture of Plant
    Plant common name Description of Plant Picture of Plant Scientific name Strangler Fig The Strangler Fig begins life as a small vine-like plant Ficus thonningii that climbs the nearest large tree and then thickens, produces a branching set of buttressing aerial roots, and strangles its host tree. An easy way to tell the difference between Strangle Figs and other common figs is that the bottom half of the Strangler is gnarled and twisted where it used to be attached to its host, the upper half smooth. A common tree on kopjes and along rivers in Serengeti; two massive Fig trees near Serengeti; the "Tree Where Man was Born" in southern Loliondo, and the "Ancestor Tree" near Endulin, in Ngorongoro are significant for the local Maasai peoples. Wild Date Palm Palms are monocotyledons, the veins in their leaves Phoenix reclinata are parallel and unbranched, and are thus relatives of grasses, lilies, bananas and orchids. The wild Date Palm is the most common of the native palm trees, occurring along rivers and in swamps. The fruits are edible, though horrible tasting, while the thick, sugary sap is made into Palm wine. The tree offers a pleasant, softly rustling, fragrant-smelling shade; the sort of shade you will need to rest in if you try the wine. Candelabra The Candelabra tree is a common tree in the western Euphorbia and Northern parts of Serengeti. Like all Euphorbias, Euphorbia the Candelabra breaks easily and is full of white, candelabrum extremely toxic latex. One drop of this latex can blind or burn the skin.
    [Show full text]
  • Illustrated Flora of East Texas --- Taxa in Volume 1 (May 2004)
    Illustrated Flora of East Texas --- Taxa in Volume 1 (May 2004) Family Genus Species Var. or Subsp. Native or Intro Ferns & Fern Allies Psilotaceae Psilotum nudum N Isoetaceae Isoetes butleri N Isoetaceae Isoetes melanopoda N Lycopodiaceae Lycopodiella alopecuroides N Lycopodiacae Lycopodiella appressa N Lycopodiaceae Lycopodiella prostrata N Lycopodiaceae Palhinhaea cernua N Lycopodiaceae Pseudolycopodiella caroliniana N Selaginellaceae Selaginella apoda var. apoda N Selaginellaceae Selaginella arenicola subsp. riddellii N Equisetaceae Equisetum hyemale subsp. affine N Equisetaceae Equisetum laevigatum N Anemiaceae Anemia mexicana N Aspleniaceae Asplenium platyneuron N Aspleniaceae Asplenium resiliens N Azollaceae Azolla caroliniana N Azollaceae Azolla mexicana N Blechnaceae Woodwardia areolata N Blechnaceae Woodwardia virginica N Dennstaedtiaceae Pteridium aquilinum var. pseudocaudatum N Dryopteridaceae Athyrium filix-femina subsp. asplenioides N Dryopteridaceae Cyrtomium falcatum I Dryopteridaceae Cystopteris protrusa N Dryopteridaceae Dryopteris celsa N Dryopteridaceae Dryopteris ludoviciana N Dryopteridaceae Nephrolepis exaltata I Dryopteridaceae Onoclea sensibilis N Dryopteridaceae Polystichum acrostichoides N Dryopteridaceae Tectaria heracleifolia N Dryopteridaceae Woodsia obtusa subsp. obtusa N Dryopteridaceae Woodsia obtusa subsp. occidentalis N Lygodiaceae Lygodium japonicum I Marsileaceae Marsilea macropoda N Marsileaceae Marsilea vestita N Marsileaceae Pilularia americana N Ophioglossaceae Botrychium biternatum N Ophioglossaceae
    [Show full text]
  • Swan and Helena Rivers Management Framework Heritage Audit and Statement of Significance • FINAL REPORT • 26 February 2009
    Swan and Helena Rivers Management Framework Heritage Audit and Statement of Significance • FINAL REPORT • 26 FEbRuARy 2009 REPORT CONTRIBUTORS: Alan Briggs Robin Chinnery Laura Colman Dr David Dolan Dr Sue Graham-Taylor A COLLABORATIVE PROJECT BY: Jenni Howlett Cheryl-Anne McCann LATITUDE CREATIVE SERVICES Brooke Mandy HERITAGE AND CONSERVATION PROFESSIONALS Gina Pickering (Project Manager) NATIONAL TRUST (WA) Rosemary Rosario Alison Storey Prepared FOR ThE EAsTERN Metropolitan REgIONAL COuNCIL ON bEhALF OF Dr Richard Walley OAM Cover image: View upstream, near Barker’s Bridge. Acknowledgements The consultants acknowledge the assistance received from the Councillors, staff and residents of the Town of Bassendean, Cities of Bayswater, Belmont and Swan and the Eastern Metropolitan Regional Council (EMRC), including Ruth Andrew, Dean Cracknell, Sally De La Cruz, Daniel Hanley, Brian Reed and Rachel Thorp; Bassendean, Bayswater, Belmont and Maylands Historical Societies, Ascot Kayak Club, Claughton Reserve Friends Group, Ellis House, Foreshore Environment Action Group, Friends of Ascot Waters and Ascot Island, Friends of Gobba Lake, Maylands Ratepayers and Residents Association, Maylands Yacht Club, Success Hill Action Group, Urban Bushland Council, Viveash Community Group, Swan Chamber of Commerce, Midland Brick and the other community members who participated in the heritage audit community consultation. Special thanks also to Anne Brake, Albert Corunna, Frances Humphries, Leoni Humphries, Oswald Humphries, Christine Lewis, Barry McGuire, May McGuire, Stephen Newby, Fred Pickett, Beverley Rebbeck, Irene Stainton, Luke Toomey, Richard Offen, Tom Perrigo and Shelley Withers for their support in this project. The views expressed in this document are the views of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the EMRC.
    [Show full text]
  • Torix Rickettsia Are Widespread in Arthropods and Reflect a Neglected Symbiosis
    GigaScience, 10, 2021, 1–19 doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giab021 RESEARCH RESEARCH Torix Rickettsia are widespread in arthropods and Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/gigascience/article/10/3/giab021/6187866 by guest on 05 August 2021 reflect a neglected symbiosis Jack Pilgrim 1,*, Panupong Thongprem 1, Helen R. Davison 1, Stefanos Siozios 1, Matthew Baylis1,2, Evgeny V. Zakharov3, Sujeevan Ratnasingham 3, Jeremy R. deWaard3, Craig R. Macadam4,M. Alex Smith5 and Gregory D. D. Hurst 1 1Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Chester High Road, Neston, Wirral CH64 7TE, UK; 2Health Protection Research Unit in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections, University of Liverpool, 8 West Derby Street, Liverpool L69 7BE, UK; 3Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario N1G2W1, Canada; 4Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Balallan House, 24 Allan Park, Stirling FK8 2QG, UK and 5Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Summerlee Science Complex, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada ∗Correspondence address. Jack Pilgrim, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. E-mail: [email protected] http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2941-1482 Abstract Background: Rickettsia are intracellular bacteria best known as the causative agents of human and animal diseases. Although these medically important Rickettsia are often transmitted via haematophagous arthropods, other Rickettsia, such as those in the Torix group, appear to reside exclusively in invertebrates and protists with no secondary vertebrate host. Importantly, little is known about the diversity or host range of Torix group Rickettsia.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Birds in Tilligerry Habitat
    Common Birds in Tilligerry Habitat Dedicated bird enthusiasts have kindly contributed to this sequence of 106 bird species spotted in the habitat over the last few years Kookaburra Red-browed Finch Black-faced Cuckoo- shrike Magpie-lark Tawny Frogmouth Noisy Miner Spotted Dove [1] Crested Pigeon Australian Raven Olive-backed Oriole Whistling Kite Grey Butcherbird Pied Butcherbird Australian Magpie Noisy Friarbird Galah Long-billed Corella Eastern Rosella Yellow-tailed black Rainbow Lorikeet Scaly-breasted Lorikeet Cockatoo Tawny Frogmouth c Noeline Karlson [1] ( ) Common Birds in Tilligerry Habitat Variegated Fairy- Yellow Faced Superb Fairy-wren White Cheeked Scarlet Honeyeater Blue-faced Honeyeater wren Honeyeater Honeyeater White-throated Brown Gerygone Brown Thornbill Yellow Thornbill Eastern Yellow Robin Silvereye Gerygone White-browed Eastern Spinebill [2] Spotted Pardalote Grey Fantail Little Wattlebird Red Wattlebird Scrubwren Willie Wagtail Eastern Whipbird Welcome Swallow Leaden Flycatcher Golden Whistler Rufous Whistler Eastern Spinebill c Noeline Karlson [2] ( ) Common Sea and shore birds Silver Gull White-necked Heron Little Black Australian White Ibis Masked Lapwing Crested Tern Cormorant Little Pied Cormorant White-bellied Sea-Eagle [3] Pelican White-faced Heron Uncommon Sea and shore birds Caspian Tern Pied Cormorant White-necked Heron Great Egret Little Egret Great Cormorant Striated Heron Intermediate Egret [3] White-bellied Sea-Eagle (c) Noeline Karlson Uncommon Birds in Tilligerry Habitat Grey Goshawk Australian Hobby
    [Show full text]
  • City of Cape Town | Table Bay Nature Reserve | Quarterly Report | January to March 2014 1
    This quarterly report summarises the activities of the Biodiversity Management Branch at the Table Bay Nature Reserve for the period from 1 January to 31 March 2014. CONTENTS PAGE 1 AREA MANAGER’S SECTION 2 2 HIGHLIGHTS AND CHALLENGES 3 3 BIODIVERSITY MANAGEMENT 4 4 NATURE CONSERVATION 6 5 WATER MANAGEMENT 8 6 FIRE MANAGEMENT 9 7 COMPLIANCE MANAGEMENT 9 8 PEOPLE AND CONSERVATION 10 9 HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 13 10 VISITORS AND INCOME 14 11 INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT 16 12 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 16 Appendix A: Press articles 17 Appendix B: Species lists 22 Figure 1. BirdLife SA's Important Bird Area (IBA) sign near the Rietvlei Education Centre. City of Cape Town | Table Bay Nature Reserve | Quarterly Report | January to March 2014 1 1 AREA MANAGER’S SECTION 1.1 Typha capensis (bulrush) reeds Numerous communications have been received from neighbours around the Table Bay Nature Reserve about Typha capensis (bulrush) reeds and the seeds that they release during February and March. From the 1950s to 1980s there were several drastic alterations to the hydrology of the wetlands in the Table Bay area, including major excavations and dredging, construction of major roads and railways, and the development of residential and industrial areas. Today these developments and roads act as drainage impoundments. Surface storm-water runoff and treated wastewater effluent is directed into the natural areas. This is changing the dynamic seasonal and temporary wetlands into more static nutrient-enriched permanent water areas. As a result of this urbanisation, elevated water and nutrient levels are more likely to persist throughout the Rietvlei wetland system.
    [Show full text]
  • Yarra's Topography Is Gently Undulating, Which Is Characteristic of the Western Basalt Plains
    Contents Contents ............................................................................................................................................................ 3 Acknowledgement of country ............................................................................................................................ 3 Message from the Mayor ................................................................................................................................... 4 Vision and goals ................................................................................................................................................ 5 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 Nature in Yarra .................................................................................................................................................. 8 Policy and strategy relevant to natural values ................................................................................................. 27 Legislative context ........................................................................................................................................... 27 What does Yarra do to support nature? .......................................................................................................... 28 Opportunities and challenges for nature .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Social Behaviour and Breeding Biology of the Yeliow-Rumped Thornbill
    Social Behaviour and Breeding Biology of the Yeliow-Rumped Thornbill Daniel Ebert A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of hilosophy of The Australian National University April 2004 Declaration The research presented in this thesis is my own original work and no part has been submitted for a previous degree. Signed Daniel Ebert April 2004 Dedication In memory of Anjeli Catherine Nathan 18 March 1975 - 3 November 1999 Acknowledgements This thesis was a work in progress, or not, for some years and many people made significant contributions of supervision, assistance or support. My supervisor, Rob Magrath, and Andrew Cockburn and David Green were instrumental in promoting thombill research as a worthwhile pursuit. I thank them for their contributions to the formulation of this project and their interest in my work. Rob Magrath’s particular combination of insight, knowledge and patience was invaluable throughout this study. I am also grateful for the general advice and guidance of Rob Heinsohn and Sarah Legge. This project involved many early morning mist-netting sessions which would have been even more “miss” than “hit” without the enthusiastic assistance of numerous volunteers. David Green, Mike Double, James Nicholls, Sarah Legge, Anjeli Nathan, Janet Gardner, Nie MacGregor, Rob Heinsohn, Rob Magrath, Andrew Cockburn and Peter Marsack all cheerfully participated in the usually unrewarding exercise of netting thombills in the mist and cold. I’m especially grateful to Steve Murphy for his competence and enthusiasm in the field and his impressive ability to find thombill nests after half an hour of “training”. Minisatellite DNA fingerprinting is an error-prone and frustrating procedure usually requiring good fortune as well as good management for success.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Rushes: Juncus Factsheets
    New Zealand Rushes: Juncus factsheets K. Bodmin, P. Champion, T. James and T. Burton www.niwa.co.nz Acknowledgements: Our thanks to all those who contributed photographs, images or assisted in the formulation of the factsheets, particularly Aarti Wadhwa (graphics) at NIWA. This project was funded by TFBIS, the Terrestrial and Freshwater Biodiversity information System (TFBIS) Programme. TFBIS is funded by the Government to help New Zealand achieve the goals of the New Zealand Biodiversity Strategy and is administered by the Department of Conservation (DOC). All photographs are by Trevor James (AgResearch), Kerry A. Bodmin or Paul D. Rushes: Champion (NIWA) unless otherwise stated. Additional images and photographs were kindly provided by Allan Herbarium; Auckland Herbarium; Larry Allain (USGS, Wetland and Aquatic Research Center); Forest and Kim Starr; Donald Cameron (Go Botany Juncus website); and Tasmanian Herbarium (Threatened Species Section, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Tasmania). factsheets © 2015 - NIWA. All rights Reserved. Cite as: Bodmin KA, Champion PD, James T & Burton T (2015) New Zealand Rushes: Juncus factsheets. NIWA, Hamilton. Introduction Rushes (family Juncaceae) are a common component of New Zealand wetland vegetation and species within this family appear very similar. With over 50 species, Juncus are the largest component of the New Zealand rushes and are notoriously difficult for amateurs and professionals alike to identify to species level. This key and accompanying factsheets have been developed to enable users with a diverse range of botanical expertise to identify Juncus to species level. The best time for collection, survey or identification is usually from December to April as mature fruiting material is required to distinguish between species.
    [Show full text]
  • Observations on the Food of Freshwater Fish from the Coal and Jordan Rivers, Tasmania
    https://doi.org/10.26749/rstpp.111.59 Papers and Proceedings of the RoyaJ Society of Tasmania, Volume 111, 1977 (ms. received 22.]2.1976) OBSERVATIONS ON THE FOOD OF FRESHWATER FISH FROM THE COAL AND JORDAN RIVERS, TASMANIA hy P. S. Lakea and G. Department of Zoology, University of Tasmania (a) now Department of Zoology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria (b) now 4 Fellows Road, Hughesdale, Victoria (with five tables) ABSTRACT The Coal and the Jordan Rivers are two slow-flowing rivers in south-eastern Tasmania. Details are given of the stomach contents of brown trout Salmo trutta Linnaeus, English perch Perea fZuviati lis Linnaeus, short-finned eels australis oeeidentaZ-is Schmidt and Tasmanian smelt Retrop-i-nna tasmaniea McCulloch collected from the Coal River and of the stomach contents of brown trout, English perch, tench, short-finned eels, freshwater flathead Pseudaphritis urvi ZZi (Cuvier and Valenciennes) and galaxiids GaZax1:as maeuZatus (Jenyns) collected from the Jordan River. INTRODUCTION The food of trout in Australia has been studied by McKeown (1934a, 1934b, 1936, 1937, 1955), Evans (1942), Butcher (1945, 1946), Wilson (1966) and Knott (1973). However, there are few published data on the food of native freshwater fish or even of non-salmonid introduced fish, Butcher (1945, 1946) examined the food of perch, austraZasica (Cuvier & Valenciennes), English marmoratus (Richardson) and (.Jcnyns). food of six Macquarie perch and brief non-quantitative the food of some native and introduced freshwater fish of New South Wales are given by Lake (1959). Recently Pollard (1973) has provided a detailed account of the diet of land-locked Gal-axias macuZatus in Lake ModevJarre, Victoria.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Copenhagen
    Assortative pairing in the amphipod Paracalliope fluviatilis: a role for parasites? Lefebvre, Francois; Fredensborg, Brian Lund; Armstrong, Amy; Hansen, Ellen; Poulin, Robert Published in: Hydrobiologia Publication date: 2005 Document version Early version, also known as pre-print Citation for published version (APA): Lefebvre, F., Fredensborg, B. L., Armstrong, A., Hansen, E., & Poulin, R. (2005). Assortative pairing in the amphipod Paracalliope fluviatilis: a role for parasites? Hydrobiologia, 545. Download date: 28. Sep. 2021 Hydrobiologia (2005) 545:65–73 Ó Springer 2005 DOI 10.1007/s10750-005-2211-0 Primary Research Paper Assortative pairing in the amphipod Paracalliope fluviatilis: a role for parasites? Franc¸ ois Lefebvre*, Brian Fredensborg, Amy Armstrong, Ellen Hansen & Robert Poulin Department of Zoology, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand (*Author for correspondence: E-mail: [email protected]) Received 10 November 2004; in revised form 26 January 2005; accepted 13 February 2005 Key words: Amphipoda, Trematoda, Coitocaecum parvum, Microphallus sp., reproduction, mate choice Abstract The potential impact of parasitism on pairing patterns of the amphipod Paracalliope fluviatilis was investigated with regard to the infection status of both males and females. Two helminth parasites com- monly use this crustacean species as second intermediate host. One of them, Coitocaecum parvum,isa progenetic trematode with an egg-producing metacercaria occasionally reaching 2.0 mm in length, i.e. more than 50% the typical length of its amphipod host. The amphipod was shown to exhibit the common reproductive features of most precopula pair-forming crustaceans, i.e. larger males and females among pairs than among singles, more fecund females in pairs, and a trend for size-assortative pairing.
    [Show full text]
  • Diverse Interactions, Including Hybridisation, Between Brown and Inland Thornbills in South Australia
    18 South Australian Ornithologist 41 (1) Diverse interactions, including hybridisation, between Brown and Inland Thornbills in South Australia ANDREW BLACK, PHILIPPA HORTON AND LEO JOSEPH Abstract relative) the Mountain Thornbill, A. katherina, of the Wet Tropics rainforests; the Inland Thornbill, A. apicalis, widespread across southern and Brown and Inland Thornbills have three zones of central Australian semi-arid and arid zones and contact in South Australia. Two of these involve the more mesic south-west of Western Australia; the Mount Lofty Ranges Brown Thornbill, which and the Tasmanian Thornbill, A. ewingi, endemic hybridises extensively with the Inland Thornbill in to Tasmania and its larger offshore islands. coastal shrublands and mangroves of eastern Gulf St Vincent, and which forms an apparently narrow Though the Brown and Inland Thornbills are not hybrid zone near Meningie with Inland Thornbills of sister species, the nature of interactions between the Upper South-East of South Australia. The third them where they approach each other in several zone involves Brown Thornbills of the South-East parts of their ranges has long been a contentious of South Australia and the Inland Thornbill, again area of research (e.g. Mayr and Serventy 1938, its Upper South-East population. This is evidently a Boles 1983, Schodde and Mason 1999). This paper broad zone of overlap without interbreeding. Closer further addresses the issue. study of the Gulf St Vincent hybrid zone revealed a variety of hybrid phenotypes but no parental forms. Across their full geographic ranges three major Most of the hybrid phenotypes resemble Inland zones of interaction between Brown and Inland Thornbills while some resemble Brown Thornbills of Thornbills have been recognised: 1) the Upper the Mount Lofty Ranges or of the South-East of South South-East of South Australia (SA) and north- Australia.
    [Show full text]