The New Zealand Gazette 2251
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Rethinking Arboreal Heritage for Twenty-First-Century Aotearoa New Zealand
NATURAL MONUMENTS: RETHINKING ARBOREAL HERITAGE FOR TWENTY-FIRST-CENTURY AOTEAROA NEW ZEALAND Susette Goldsmith A thesis submitted to Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Victoria University of Wellington 2018 ABSTRACT The twenty-first century is imposing significant challenges on nature in general with the arrival of climate change, and on arboreal heritage in particular through pressures for building expansion. This thesis examines the notion of tree heritage in Aotearoa New Zealand at this current point in time and questions what it is, how it comes about, and what values, meanings and understandings and human and non-human forces are at its heart. While the acknowledgement of arboreal heritage can be regarded as the duty of all New Zealanders, its maintenance and protection are most often perceived to be the responsibility of local authorities and heritage practitioners. This study questions the validity of the evaluation methods currently employed in the tree heritage listing process, tree listing itself, and the efficacy of tree protection provisions. The thesis presents a multiple case study of discrete sites of arboreal heritage that are all associated with a single native tree species—karaka (Corynocarpus laevigatus). The focus of the case studies is not on the trees themselves, however, but on the ways in which the tree sites fill the heritage roles required of them entailing an examination of the complicated networks of trees, people, events, organisations, policies and politics situated within the case studies, and within arboreal heritage itself. Accordingly, the thesis adopts a critical theoretical perspective, informed by various interpretations of Actor Network Theory and Assemblage Theory, and takes a ‘counter-’approach to the authorised heritage discourse introducing a new notion of an ‘unauthorised arboreal heritage discourse’. -
A Diachronic Study of Unparliamentary Language in the New Zealand Parliament, 1890-1950
WITHDRAW AND APOLOGISE: A DIACHRONIC STUDY OF UNPARLIAMENTARY LANGUAGE IN THE NEW ZEALAND PARLIAMENT, 1890-1950 BY RUTH GRAHAM A thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Applied Linguistics Victoria University of Wellington 2016 ii “Parliament, after all, is not a Sunday school; it is a talking-shop; a place of debate”. (Barnard, 1943) iii Abstract This study presents a diachronic analysis of the language ruled to be unparliamentary in the New Zealand Parliament from 1890 to 1950. While unparliamentary language is sometimes referred to as ‘parliamentary insults’ (Ilie, 2001), this study has a wider definition: the language used in a legislative chamber is unparliamentary when it is ruled or signalled by the Speaker as out of order or likely to cause disorder. The user is required to articulate a statement of withdrawal and apology or risk further censure. The analysis uses the Communities of Practice theoretical framework, developed by Wenger (1998) and enhanced with linguistic impoliteness, as defined by Mills (2005) in order to contextualise the use of unparliamentary language within a highly regulated institutional setting. The study identifies and categorises the lexis of unparliamentary language, including a focus on examples that use New Zealand English or te reo Māori. Approximately 2600 examples of unparliamentary language, along with bibliographic, lexical, descriptive and contextual information, were entered into a custom designed relational database. The examples were categorised into three: ‘core concepts’, ‘personal reflections’ and the ‘political environment’, with a number of sub-categories. This revealed a previously unknown category of ‘situation dependent’ unparliamentary language and a creative use of ‘animal reflections’. -
Human Rights in New Zealand
Acknowledgements: The New Zealand Law Foundation funded the three year research project and we are enormously grateful for their financial and moral support. We would like to thank the stakeholders who contributed to the research and to those experts who read individual chapters and provided feedback. We appreciate the work of Kyle Stutter of the New Zealand Human Rights Commission and Kirsty Whitby in the School of Social Sciences and Public Policy at AUT for money matters. Millie Wall patiently formatted the report and designed the cover. Heidi Jones and Anne-Marie Laure provided valuable research in the early stages of the project. Sir Geoffrey Palmer undertook the overall peer review and John Harvey proof read the report several times. Any errors of fact or grammatical imperfections are ours alone and will be corrected in web-based versions of the report. Contact details: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 1 Contents Summary of recommendations ............................................................................................. 9 Chapter One Human Rights ........................................................................................ 11 1 Introduction to human rights .................................................................................................. 11 1.1 A short history of the evolution and development of human rights in New Zealand. ... 12 1.1.1 1948 to 1968 – Period of inaction .................................................................................. 13 1.1.2 1968 -
East Stand (A)
EAST STAND (A) ACHIE ATWELL • GEORGE BOGGIS • JOHN ELLIOTT • DAVID BREWSTER • GILLIAN ROBINS • DESMOND DESHAUT • PETER CWIECZEK • JAMES BALLARD • PETER TAYLOR • JOHN CLEARY • MARK LIGHTERNESS • TERENCE KERRISON • ANTHONY TROCIAN • GEORGE BURT • JESSICA RICHARDSON • STEVE WICK • BETHAN MAYNARD • MICHAEL SAMMONS • DAN MAUGHAN • EMILY CRANE • STEFANO SALUSTRI • MARTIN CHIDWICK • SOPHIA THURSTON • RICHARD HACK • PHILIP PITT • ROBERT SAMBIDGE • DEREK VOLLER • DAVID PARKINSON • LEONARD COONEY • KAREN PARISH • KIRSTY NORFOLK • SAMUEL MONAGHAN • TONY CLARKE • RAY MCCRINDLE • MIKKEL RUDE • FREDERIC HALLER • JAMIE JAXON • SCOTT JASON • JACQUELINE DUTTON • RICHARD GRAHAM • MATTHEW SHEEHAN • EMILY CONSTABLE • TERRY MARABLE • DANNY SMALLDRIDGE • PAULA GRACE • JOHN ASHCROFT • BARNABY BLACKMAN • JESSICA REYNOLDS • DENNIS DODD • GRAHAM HAWKES • SHAUN MCCABE • STEPHEN RUGGIERO • ALAN DUFFY • BEN PETERS • PAUL SHEPPARD • SIMON WISE • IAN SCOTT • MARK FINSTER • CONNOR MCCLYMONT • JOSEPH O’DRISCOLL • FALCON GREEN • LEAH FINCHAM • ROSS TAYLOR • YONI ADLER • SAMUEL LENNON • IAN PARSONS • GEORGE REILLY • BRIAN WINTER • JOSEPH BROWN • CHARLIE HENNEY • PAUL PRYOR • ROBERT BOURKE • DAREN HALL • DANIEL HANBURY • JOHN PRYOR • BOBBY O’DONOGHUE • ROBERT KNIGHT • BILLY GREEN • MAISIE-JAE JOYCE • LEONARD GAYLE • KEITH JONES • PETER MOODY • ANDY ATWELL DANIEL SEDDON • ROBBIE WRIGHT • PAUL BOWKER • KELLY CLARK • DUNCAN LEVERETT • BILL SINGH • RODNEY CASSAR • ASHER BRILL • MARTIN WILLIAMS • KEVIN BANE • TERRY PORTER • GARETH DUGGAN • DARREN SHEPHERD • KEN CAMPBELL • PHYLLIS -
New Zealand Gazette Extraordinary
No. 82 1943 THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE EXTRAORDINARY Published by Authority WELLINGTON, MONDAY, 12 DECEMBER 1960 Resignation of M embers of the Executive Council and of The Honourable Mabel Bowden Howard, holding a seat Ministers in the Executive Council and the office of Minister of Social Security; The Honourable John Mathison, holding a seat in the Executive Council and the offices of Minister of Trans His Excellency the Governor-General has been pleased to port and Minister of Island Territories; accept the resignation of : The Honourable Raymond Boord, holding a seat in the The Right Honourable Walter Nash, C.H., holding a seat in Executive Council and the office of Minister of Customs; the Executive Council and the offi ce of Prime Minister, and Minister of External Affairs, and Minister of Maori The Honourable William Theophilus Anderton, holding Affairs; a seat in the Executive Council and the office of Minister The Honourable Clarence Farringdon Skinner, M.C., hold of Internal Affairs. ing a seat in the Executive Council and the offices of Minister of Agriculture and Minister of Lands; Dated at Wellington this 12th day of December 1960. The Honourable Arnold Henry N ordmeyer, holding a seat By Command- in the Executive Council and the office of Minister of D. C. WILLIAMS, Official Secretary. Finance; The Honourable Henry Greathead Rex Mason, Q.C., hold ing a seat in the Executive Council and the offices of Members of the Executive Council Appointed Attorney-General, Minister of Justice, and Minister of Health; The Honourable Frederick -
Friday, March 13, 2020 Home-Delivered $1.90, Retail $2.20
TE NUPEPA O TE TAIRAWHITI FRIDAY, MARCH 13, 2020 HOME-DELIVERED $1.90, RETAIL $2.20 • WORST MARKET CRASHES SINCE 1987 CORONAVIRUS • EU CONDEMNS TRUMP’S TRAVEL BAN PAGES 7, 11, 13-15, 28 • NZ BORDER RESTRICTIONS TO BE FURTHER TIGHTENED • CANADIAN PM AND WIFE SELF-ISOLATE • IRAN ASKS FOR US$5B LOAN TO FIGHT VIRUS $17 million tax fraud alleged Innocent by virtue of tikanga says accused A GISBORNE farmer accused of “tikanga”. evading tax totalling $17million, will The Maori concept of tikanga can be stand trial in the High Court later this interpreted many ways. Its definition year. includes correct procedure, custom and John Richard Bracken, 54, was the protocol. subject of a joint investigation by police Mr Helmbright, who describes himself and the Inland Revenue Department. It as a “native assessor”, is of Maori resulted in charges alleging fraudulent descent and is a cousin of Bracken’s use of documents — GST claim forms wife Margaret, who is also of Maori in which he falsely showed his business descent. running at a loss over four years up to Mr Helmbright was a witness for June, 2018. Bracken in a prosecution last year in He has pleaded not guilty and claims which Gisborne District Council alleged he is innocent by virtue of “tikanga”. Bracken committed 10 criminal offences An estimated $11 million dollars of under the Resource Management Act his assets were frozen in December, (between December, 2017 and March, 2018, due to a successful application 2018) and twice breached council- by police under the Criminal Proceeds issued abatement notices, in relation to Recovery Act. -
Public Sector, Vol. 30, (4) 2008
PUBLIC SECTOR Public Sector, Vol. 30, (4) 2008 Articles The changing nature of parliamentary practice Politics and administration Reflections on the partnership between the School of Government and the State services State-owned Enterprise governance News Fellowship and Distinguished Service Awards Submission IPANZ’s submission to the investigation into the Public Service recruitment and employment of Madeleine Setchell Publisher Institute of Public Administration New Zealand. P O Box 5032, Wellington, New Zealand. Phone +64 4 463 6940 Fax: +64 4 463 6939 PUBLIC Email: [email protected] The whole of the literary matter of Public Sector is copyright ©2007 – IPANZ Editor Allen Petrey SECTOR Layout Hettie Barnard Volume 30 Number 4 2008 ISSN 0110-5191 Editorial Office c/- The Publisher as above Contents Editorial Committee Articles Tom Berthold Ralph Chapman The changing nature of parliamentary practice Chris Eichbaum by David McGee .................................................................................................................... 2 Geoff Lewis Allen Petrey Politics and administration: some reflections on the ‘Setchell Affair’ (or Michael Reid boundary riding in the purple zone) Carol Stigley by Chris Eichbaum and Richard Shaw ................................................................................... 8 Advertising Reflections on the partnership between the School of Government and Jay Matthes the State services: where to from here? Phone: +64 4 463 6940 by Gary Hawke ....................................................................................................................15 -
The Case Against an Australian Bill of Rights
Don’t Leave Us with the Bill: The Case Against an Australian Bill of Rights Edited by Julian Leeser and Ryan Haddrick Don’t Leave Us with the Bill The Case Against an Australian Bill of Rights Edited by Julian Leeser and Ryan Haddrick Published by The Menzies Research Centre Limited RG Menzies House Cnr Blackall and Macquarie Streets BARTON, ACT 2600 ISBN 978-0-9806383-0-1 The Menzies Research Centre Limited is a company limited by guarantee ACN 067 379 684. The Menzies Research Centre is supported by a grant from the Commonwealth Department of Finance and Deregulation The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Directors or staff of The Menzies Research Centre. © 2009 The Menzies Research Centre Project management and production: QOTE Canberra (02) 6162 1258 iii Foreword THE RT HON SIR NINIAN ST EPHEN , KG, AK, GCMG, GCVO, KBE, QC he expression ‘a bill of rights’ has an immediate attraction to it; to be subject to such a measure seems at first sight inherently desirable, just the kind of legislative measure a freedom loving nation would Taspire to. Only with experience of the operation of such measures do doubts arise. The true measure of those doubts lies in the assumption, inherent in any such measure, that at a given moment in time it is possible once and for all to identify and declare, both for now and for the future, all those rights which citizens should desirably possess, secure in the knowledge that such a declaration will serve all future needs of the community. -
No 89, 19 December 1946, 1907
~umb. 89 1907 THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE WELLINGTON, THURSDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1946 Land proClaimed as Road in Block X, Maungakawa Survey District, SECOND SCHEDULE Piako Oounty STREET CLOSED [JJ.s.] B. C. FREYJ?ERG, Governor-General ApPROXIMATE area of the piece of street closed: 3 roods 15·7 perches. Adjoining Sections 237, 243, and 250, Town of Foxton (Borough A PROCLAMATION of Foxton); coloured green.' . URSUANT to section twelve of the Land Act, 1924, I, P Lieutenant-General Sir Bernard Cyril Freyberg, the All situated in Block V, Mount Robinson Survey District. Governor-General of the Dominion of New Zealand, do hereby (S.O. 21345.) proclaim as road the land described in the Schedule hereto. In the Wellington Land District; as the same are more parti cularly delineated on the plan marked P.W.D. 123560, deposited SCHEDULE in the office of the Minister of Works at Wellington, and thereon ApPROXIMATE areas of the pieces of land proclaimed as road:- coloured as above mentioned. A. R. P. Being Given under the hand of His Excellency the Governor-General o 2 15 Part Lot 2, D.P. 13342, being part Tahuroa No.2 of the Dominion of New Zealand, and. issued under the Block; coloured blue. Seal of that Dominion, this 13th day of December, 1946. o 0 13 Part Waikuku No. 1 Block on D.P. 14343; R. SEMPLE, Minister of Works. coloured yellow. o 1 8·8 Part Waikuku No.1 Block; coloured sepia. GOD SAVE THE KING 1 o 0 10 Part Lot 2, D.P. 13342, being part Tahuroa (P.W. -
Talk for Waikanae U3A Kaleidoscope, 19Th October 2020 Te
1 Talk for Waikanae U3A Kaleidoscope, 19th October 2020 Te Oka - Pākehā Kaumātua The Life of Jock McEwen Book cover 2 How did I come to be part of Jock McEwen’s family? In the late 1950s my mother, Peg Fleming, and another friend in the Federation of University Women, Marie Head, decided they would like to get to know some of the Maori women who had moved to Wellington to find work. So they started a group they called the Maori-Pakeha Group, together with members of the local Maori Women’s Welfare League, many of whom also belonged to the Ngati Poneke Maori club. In 1963 they held a joint meeting in the Ngati Poneke hall and Mum asked me to write out some posters to advertise it. That was when I first heard the name ‘Jock McEwen’, who was to be the speaker. The next year I met his son Andrew at university. Andrew’s mother invited me to dinner with my parents, after which both our mothers encouraged our relationship which might be why we have been happily married for fifty-four years. In his old age Jock told me he enjoyed the biography I wrote about my own father, Charles Fleming but I had not thought of writing about Jock until his tangi at Upper Hutt’s Orongomai Marae. That was when I really appreciated that this man was no ordinary human being. So how did I go about the task? 3 As well as interviewing people who had known Jock, I had access to four wonderful sources of written and tape-recorded information. -
The New Zealand Gazette 1413
SEPT. 20] THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE 1413 Declaration of Result of Poll for the S01ithern 11! aori Electoral Disll'ict Patea : William Alfred Sheat. Petone : Michael Moohan. JOHN ROYDEN SANSOM, Returning Officer for the Southern Piako : William Stanley Goosman. I , Maori Electoral District, do hereby declare the result of the Ponsonby: Ritchie Macdonald. poll taken on the 1st day of September 1951 for the eleotion of a Raglan : Hallyburton Johns_tone. Member of Parliament for the said district to be as follows :- Rangitikei : Edward Brice Killen Gordon. Candidates. Votes Polled. Remuera : Ronald Macmillan Algie. Riccarton : Angus MoLagan. Eruera Tihema Tirikatene 979 William Kelly Beaton Rodney: Thomas Clifton Webb. 320 Roskill: John Rae. Total number of valid votes polled . I, 299 St Albans: Jack Thomas Watts. St. Kilda : James George Barnes. Number of votes rejeoted as informal 13 Selwyn: John Kenneth McAlpine. I therefore declare the said Eruera Tihema Tirikatene to be Sydenham: Mabel Bowden Howard. elected. Tamaki : Eric Henry Halstead. Tauranga: George Augustus Walsh. Dated at Christchurch, this 11th day of September 1951. Timaru: Clyde Leonard Carr. J. R. SANSOM, Returning Officer. Waikato: Geoffrey Fantham Sim. Waimarino : Patrick Kearins. Waimate: David Campbell Kidd. Wairarapa: Bertie Victor Cooksley. Dedaration of Result of Poll for the Western Maori Electoral, Dietrict Waitakere: Henry Greathead Rex Mason. Waitomo: Walter James Broadfoot. I JAMES ALEXANDER MILLS, Returning Officer for the Wallace : Thomas Lachlan Macdonald. 9 Western Maori Electoral District, do hereby declare the Wanganui: Joseph Bernard Francis Cotterill. result of the poll taken on the 1st day of September 1951" for the Wellington Central: Charles Henry Chapman. -
Chapter 1: Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Research Question 8 1.3 Methodology and Method 9 1.3.1 Methodology 9 1.3.2 Method 11 1.4 Structure of the Thesis 13
TAXING AND PLEASING: THE RHETORIC AND REALITY OF VERTICAL EQUITY IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE NEW ZEALAND INCOME TAX ON EMPLOYEES, 1891 TO 1984 A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of Canterbury by Robert J. Vosslamber University of Canterbury 2010 ii NOTE NEW ZEALAND CURRENCY New Zealand adopted decimal currency from 1 July 1967. Previously, New Zealand‘s currency was as follows: One pound (£1) equaled 20 shillings (20s.) One shilling equaled 12 pence (12d.) On adoption of decimal currency, section 5(4) of the Decimal Currency Act 1964 provided that: One pound (£1) equaled two dollars ($) One shilling (1s.) equaled 10 cents (c) 5 One penny (1d.) equaled /6 cent. To convert amounts denominated in pounds to dollars, multiply by two. iii ABSTRACT Taxation equity may be classified into horizontal equity, where people who are in the same economic position should be taxed the same, and vertical equity, where those who differ economically should be treated differently. In the New Zealand income tax, the vertical equity norm has primarily been achieved by progressive tax rates, and by family-friendly adjustments. Given that the income tax intentionally discriminates between taxpayers on the basis of taxpayer- specific characteristics such as income level and domestic situation, the question arises as to how the New Zealand income tax in its successive manifestations has been justified as fair; that is, what vertical equity in the New Zealand income tax looked like and how it was justified. This thesis considers the practice of the New Zealand income tax since its introduction in 1891 until 1984.