DOCSLIB.ORG

(FIP) in Mozambique Investment Plan DRAFT UT-REDD, MITADER

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(FIP) in Mozambique Investment Plan DRAFT UT-REDD, MITADER Forest Investment Plan – Version 3.1 17.5.2016 Forest Investment Plan (FIP) In Mozambique Investment Plan DRAFT Version 3.1 UT-REDD, MITADER 1 Forest Investment Plan – Version 3.1 17.5.2016 Table of Contents Contents List of abbreviations and acronyms 4 Summary of Country Investment Plan 6 Section 1: Description of the country and sector context 14 Section 2: Identification of Opportunities for Greenhouse Gas Abatement 21 Section 3: Enabling policy and regulatory environment 24 3.1 National political commitment 24 3.2 Multi-sectoral coordination 25 3.3 MITADER Vision and Flagship Programs 26 3.4 Legal and Institutional Framework for Forests and Climate Change 32 3.5 Implementation Capacity and Challenges 43 Section 4: Expected Co-Benefits from FIP Investment 48 Section 5: Collaboration among MDBs and with other Partners 50 Section 6: Identification and rationale for projects and programs to be co-financed by FIP 52 6.1 Project/Module One: Mozambique Forest Investment Project (supported by the World Bank) 64 6.2 Project/Module Two: Emissions Reductions in the Forest Sector through Planted Forests with Major Investors-(IFC) 69 Section 7: Implementation potential with risk assessment 77 Section 8: Financing plan and instruments 82 Section 9: Results Framework for Investment Plan 84 ANNEX 1 – Projects Proposed for the Mozambique Investment Plan 89 Project/Module 1 - Mozambique Forest Investment Project (MozFIP) 90 Project/Module 2 - Emissions Reductions in the Forest Sector through Planted Forests with Major Investors 103 Annex 2: Stakeholder Engagement and Consultation Plan for the FIP Investment Plan (IP) 116 Annex 3: DGM in Mozambique 126 Annex 4: FCPF/UNREDD Readiness Preparation Proposal (R-PPs), National REDD+ Plan, Action Plan 129 Annex 5: Evaluation of the Mozambique Investment Plan (MIP) for the Forest Investment Program (FIP) and Response from the Mozambican Government 130 Annex 6: IBRD, AfDB and IFC activities in Mozambique 137 2 Forest Investment Plan – Version 3.1 17.5.2016 Figures Figure 1- Forests of Mozambique –Ecological Zones 15 Figure 2- Deforestation rates inside (0.009% p.a) vs. outside (0.61%p.a.) the Gilé National Reserve in Zambezia 17 Figure 3 - The process of deforestation and degradation with the interaction of different factors. 20 Figure 4 - National and regional distribution of emissions by driver. 20 Figure 5 - Opportunities to Reduce Deforestation 23 Figure 6 - Programa Estrela and its Complementary Projects 30 Figure 7 - Ongoing and planned operations in support of REDD+ in Mozambique. 36 Figure 8 – UGFI Structure at current time. 38 Figure 9 -– UGFI Staffing Structure 39 Figure 10 - UGFI Linkages 39 Figure 11 - Overview of Compliance Challenges 45 Figure 12 - Logical Model 54 Figure 13 - Modular Expansion 54 Figure 14 - Forests of Mozambique with Module One Landscapes identified 63 Figure 15 - Project One Framework 65 Figure 16 - Cabo Delgado Landscape 66 Figure 17 - Zambezia Landscape 67 Figure 18 - Floresta em Pé and FIP Interventions 69 .Figure 19 - Mosaic landscape to be implemented in Zambézia 71 Figure 20 - Project Two Framework 73 Figure 21 - Structure of MozFIP 91 Figure 22 - Programs and projects approved and under negotiation for environment, REDD+ and natural resource management in Mozambique 131 Tables Table 1 - The main drivers of deforestation in Mozambique. 18 Table 2 - MITADER responsibilities 28 Table 3- UGFI Responsibilities 38 Table 4 - Mozambique’s Institutional capacity for MRV, developed under REDD+ Readiness, useful for FIP 41 Table 5 - Direct and Indirect Drivers of Deforestation 53 Table 6 - Mozambique FIP Theory of Change 56 Table 7 - Forest Reference Emissions Levels: Cabo Delgado Landscape 68 Table 8 - Implementation risks and their mitigation measures 81 Table 9 - List of consultations and number of participants per consultation 117 Table 10 - Participation in FIP Consultations, breakdown per sector 118 Table 11 - Participation in FIP consultations, by gender 118 Table 12 - Participation in DGM Consultations, breakdown per sector 118 Table 13 - Participation in DGM consultations, by gender 119 Table 14 - Participation in the Online Consultation, breakdown per sector 120 Table 15 - Geographic representation of respondents in online consultation 120 Table 16- Participation in informative workshops and consultations on final IP, breakdown per sector 121 Table 17 - Participation in informative workshops and consultations on final IP, breakdown per gender 121 Table 18 - Matrix of Comments and Responses 125 Table 19 - General criteria for assessing the Mozambique Investment Plan (MIP) 133 Table 20 - FIP Specific Criteria for assessing the Mozambique Investment Plan (MIP) 134 Table 21 - Natural resource management portfolios of MDBs in Mozambique 142 3 Forest Investment Plan – Version 3.1 17.5.2016 List of abbreviations and acronyms AAC Annual Allowable Cut ANAC National Administration of Conservation Areas (Administração Nacional de Áreas de Conservação) AQUA National Agency for Environmental Quality Control (Agência Nacional para o Controlo de Qualidade Ambiental) CDS-ZC Centre for Sustainable Development in Coastal Zones (Centro de Desenvolvimento Sustentável para as Zonas Costeiras) CEAGRE Centre of Studies for Agriculture and Natural Resource Management (Centro de Estudos de Agricultura e Gestão de Recursos Naturais) CENACARTA National Cartography and Remote Sensing Centre (Centro Nacional de Cartografia e Teledetecção) CONDES Council of Sustainable Development (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Sustentável) COP Conference of Parties CSO Civil Society Organization CTR Technical Review Committee DGM Dedicated Grant Mechanism for Local Communities DINAF National Forest Directorate (Direcção Nacional de Florestas) DNTF National Directorate of Land and Forestry (Direcção Nacional de Terras e Florestas) DUAT Land Use Rights (Direito de Uso e Aproveitamento de Terra) EIA Environmental Investigation Agency FAEF Faculty of Agronomy and Forest Engineering (Faculdade de Agronomia e Engenharia Florestal) FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations FCPF Forest Carbon Partnership Facility FIP Forest Investment Program FUNAB National Fund for the Environment (Fundo Nacional do Ambiente) FNDS Fund for Sustainable Development (Fundo do Desenvolvimento Sustentavel) FUNAE Energy Fund (Fundo de Energia) GEF Global Environment Facility GHG Greenhouse Gases GoM Government of Mozambique IDA International Development Association IFC International Finance Corporation IGCC Interagency Group on Climate Change (Grupo Interinstitucional para as Mudanças Climáticas) IIAM National Institute for Agriculture Research (Instituto de Investigação Agrária de Moçambique) INDC Intended Nationally Determined Contribution INE National Institute of Statistics (Instituto Nacional de Estatística) INFATEC Training Institute in Administration of Land and Cartography (Instituto de Formação em Administração de Terras e Cartografia) INFLOR National Forest Institute (Instituto Nacional Florestal) IP Investment Plan IPLC Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities JICA Japan International Cooperation Agency 4 Forest Investment Plan – Version 3.1 17.5.2016 MASA Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security (Ministério da Agricultura e Segurança Alimentar) MDB Multilateral Development Banks MEF Ministry of Economy and Finance (Ministério da Economia e Finanças) MICOA Ministry for the Coordination of Environmental Action (Ministério para a Coordenação da Acção Ambiental) MITADER Ministry of Land, Environment and Rural Development (Ministério da Terra, Ambiente e Desenvolvimento Rural) MRV Monitoring, Reporting and Verification NASCCM National Adaptation Strategy and Climate Change Mitigation (Estratégia Nacional de Adaptação e. Mitigação de Mudanças Climáticas) NGO Non-Governmental Organization NTFP Non-Timber Forest Products PCDP Community Development Program QNP Quirimbas National Park REDD Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation REDD+ Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation, together with conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks REL/RL Reference Emissions Level SESA Strategic Environmental and Social Assessment SISFLOF Forest and Wildlife management information system SME Small and Medium Enterprises UEM Eduardo Mondlane University UGFI International Funds Management Unit (Unidade de Gestão de Fundos Internacionais) UMC Climate Change Unit (Unidade de Mudanças Climáticas) UN United Nations UNCCD United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification UNEP United Nations Environment Programme UNFCCC United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change UT-REDD+ REDD+ Technical Unit WWF World Wide Fund for Nature 5 Forest Investment Plan – Version 3.1 17.5.2016 FOREST INVESTMENT PROGRAM Summary of Country Investment Plan 1. Country/Region: Mozambique 2. FIP Funding Grant: 10.8M Loan: 13.2M Request (in USD million): 3. National FIP Momade Nemane, FIP Coordinator, MITADER, Focal Point: [email protected]:[email protected] 4. National Ministry of Land, Environment, and Rural Development (MITADER) Implementing Agency (Coordination of Investment Plan): 5. Involved MDB World Bank, IFC, AFDB 6. MDB FIP Focal Headquarters-FIP Focal Point: TTL: World Bank – Andre Aquino, Point and Tim Brown, Senior Natural World Bank – Gerhard Dieterle, Lead Project/Program Resources Management Specialists, Adviser, [email protected] Task Team Leader [email protected], (TTL): IFC –Joyita Mukherjee, Senior Operations
Load more

Recommended publications
  • World Bank Documents
    Document of The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized Report No.: 84667-MZ Public Disclosure Authorized PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT THE REPUBLIC OF MOZAMBIQUE DECENTRALIZED PLANNING AND FINANCE PROJECT (IDA-HO670-MOZ) February 18, 2014 Public Disclosure Authorized IEG Public Sector Evaluation Independent Evaluation Group Public Disclosure Authorized ii Currency Equivalents (annual averages) Currency Unit = Mozambican metical (MZM) 2004 US$1.00 MZN 22,144.71 2005 US$1.00 MZN 22,850.81 2006 US$1.00 MZN 25,758.32 (January to July) 2006 US$1.00 MZN 25.89 (July to December) 2007 US$1.00 MZN 25.79 2008 US$1.00 MZN 24.19 2009 US$1.00 MZN 27.58 2010 US$1.00 MZN 34.24 Abbreviations and Acronyms CCAGG Concerned Citizens of Abra for Good Government CPIA Country Program and Institutional Assessments DGA Development Grant Agreement DPFP Decentralized Planning and Finance Project FCA Fundo de Compensação Autárquica FIL Fundo de Iniciativa Local FRELIMO Frente de Libertação de Moçambique GTZ German Technical Cooperation ICR Implementation Completion Report IDA International Development Association IEG Independent Evaluation Group IEGPS IEG Public Sector Evaluation M&E Monitoring and Evaluation MOPH Ministry of Public Works and Housing MOZ Mozambique NDPFP National Decentralized Planning and Finance Project PAD Project Appraisal document PARPA Action Plan for Reduction of Absolute Poverty PEDD Plano Estratégico de Desenvolvimento Distrital PEFA Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability PESOD Plano Económico Social e Orçamento Distrital PPAR Project Performance Assessment Report PRSCs Poverty Reduction Strategy Credits PSRP Public Sector Reform Project UNCDF United Nations Capital Development Fund UNDP United Nations Development Program UNICEF United Nations Children's Fund Fiscal Year Government: January I - December 31 Acting Director-General, Independent Evaluation Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mozambican National Resistance (Renamo) As Described by Ex-Patticipants
    The Mozambican National Resistance (Renamo) as Described by Ex-patticipants Research Report Submitted to: Ford Foundation and Swedish International Development Agency William Minter, Ph.D. Visiting Researcher African Studies Program Georgetown University Washington, DC March, 1989 Copyright Q 1989 by William Minter Permission to reprint, excerpt or translate this report will be granted provided that credit is given rind a copy sent to the author. For more information contact: William Minter 1839 Newton St. NW Washington, DC 20010 U.S.A. INTRODUCTION the top levels of the ruling Frelirno Party, local party and government officials helped locate amnestied ex-participants For over a decade the Mozambican National Resistance and gave access to prisoners. Selection was on the basis of the (Renamo, or MNR) has been the principal agent of a desuuctive criteria the author presented: those who had spent more time as war against independent Mozambique. The origin of the group Renamo soldiers. including commanders, people with some as a creation of the Rhodesian government in the mid-1970s is education if possible, adults rather than children. In a number of well-documented, as is the transfer of sponsorship to the South cases, the author asked for specific individuals by name, previ- African government after white Rhodesia gave way to inde- ously identified from the Mozambican press or other sources. In pendent Zimbabwe in 1980. no case were any of these refused, although a couple were not The results of the war have attracted increasing attention geographically accessible. from the international community in recent years. In April 1988 Each interview was carried out individually, out of hearing the report written by consultant Robert Gersony for the U.
    [Show full text]
  • Drinking Water Supply and Sanitation Interventions in Rural Mozambique
    Report | no. 360 Report | no. Impact evaluation of drinking water supply and sanitation interventions in rural Mozambique Since 2006, the UNICEF–Netherlands Partnership evaluation office. It found evidence of a large Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation has increase in the use of improved water sources been supporting Water Supply and Sanitation and in the ownership and use of latrines. Much of programmes in Mozambique. The largest the increase can be attributed to an innovative programme, the ‘One Million Initiative’ aims to approach to sanitation. However, water from bring improved sanitation and clean water to improved sources and even more importantly, over one million people in rural Mozambique. stored water, are not always safe to drink. An Half-way through the programme, a joint impact element of subsidy will continue to be needed to evaluation was carried out by IOB and UNICEF’s sustain facilities and services. More than Water Published by: Ministry of Foreign Affairs Impact evaluation of drinking water supply and sanitation interventions in rural Mozambique Policy and Operations Evaluation Department (IOB) P.O. box 20061 | 2500 eb The Hague | The Netherlands www.minbuza.nl/iob © Ministry of Foreign Affairs | October 2011| ISBN 978-90-5328-414-8 11Buz283729 | E This project was a product of a cooperation between: Impact evaluation of drinking water supply and sanitation interventions in rural Mozambique More than Water Mid-term impact evaluation: UNICEF – Government of The Netherlands Partnership for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene ‘One Million Initiative’, Mozambique Impact evaluation of drinking water supply and sanitation interventions in rural Mozambique Preface Drinking water supply and basic sanitation has been a priority for the Netherlands’ development co-operation and for UNICEF for many years.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation & Law Enforcement In
    CONSERVATION & LAW ENFORCEMENT IN GORONGOSA & NIASSA: A STUDY OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCESS FOR WILDLIFE CRIME, FROM APPREHENSION TO INCARCERATION JULY 2019 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Mozambique Monitoring and Evaluation Mechanism and Services (MMEMS) for Management Systems International (MSI), A Tetra Tech Company. CONSERVATION & ENFORCEMENT IN GORONGOSA & NIASSA: A STUDY OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCESS FOR WILDLIFE CRIME FROM APPREHENSION TO INCARCERATION Contracted under Contract No. AID-656-C-17-00002 Mozambique Monitoring and Evaluation Mechanism and Services (MMEMS) DISCLAIMER The authors’ views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. CONTENTS ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................ II EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................ 4 BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION TO THE BUST-TO-BARS (B2B) STUDY ...................................................................................................................... 9 CONTEXT ................................................................................................................................................................. 9 STUDY PURPOSE, RATIONALE AND USES ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Public Disclosure Authorized MIISTRY OF AGRICULTURE SUSTAIABLE IRRIGATIO DEVELOPMET PROJECT (PROIRRI) Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Final Report Prepared by: atasha Ribeiro e Aniceto Chaúque Public Disclosure Authorized Maputo, October 2010 LIST OF ABBREVIATIOS ANE National Administration of Roads/Administração Nacional de Estradas ARA Regional Water Management /Administração Regional de Aguas CNA National Cotton Company/ Companhia Nacional Algodoeira CBD Convention on Biological Diversity CEPAGRI Centre for the Promotion of Agriculture/Centro de Promoção da Agricultura CNDS National Commission for Sustainable Development/Comissão Nacional de Desenvolvimento Sustentável DCA Department of Animal Science/Departamento de Ciência Animal DCC District Consultative Committee/Conselho Consultivo distrital DDOPH District Directorate of Public Works and Housing/Direcção Distrital de Obras Públicas e Habitação DE Directorate of Economics/Direcção de Economia DEP Department of Roads and Bridges/ Departamento de Estradas e Pontes DER Department of Rural Extension/Departamento de extensão Rural DNAIA National Directorate of Environmental Impact Assessment/Direcção Nacional de Avaliação de Impacto Ambiental DNEE National Directorate of Electric Energy/Direcção Nacional de Energia Eléctrica DNS National Directorate of Health/Direcção Nacional de Saúde DNSA National Directorate of Agrarian Services/Direcvo Nacional de Serviços Agrários DNTF National Directorate of Land and
    [Show full text]
  • The Province of Sofala
    Agriculture, Fisheries and Food A study of the development and implementation of strategies for sustainable local land management based on practical experiences Part 1: Mozambique Imprint Published by: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH Division Agriculture, Fisheries and Food Sector Project Land Management P.O. Box 5180 65726 Eschborn/Germany T +49 6196 79 – 0 F +49 6196 79 – 1115 E [email protected] I www.gtz.de Responsible: Tanja Pickardt, Sector Project Land Management Authors: Dr. Christoph Trusen, Dr. André Calengo, Berta Rafael Editor: Nicolas Lamadé Source and Copyright of Cover Photo: © GTZ Contact person at the Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ): Dr. Stefan Schmitz Design: Nike Affeld Eschborn, July 2010 Strategies for sustainable local land management Part 1: Mozambique Table of Contents List of Abbreviations.......................................................................................................................................... 3 1. Executive Summary.............................................................................................................................. 4 2. Introduction........................................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Objectives and Expected Output of the Study................................................................................ 7 2.2 Methodology.........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    The World Bank Report No: ISR16913 Implementation Status & Results Mozambique National Decentralized Planning and Finance Program (P107311) Operation Name: National Decentralized Planning and Finance Program Project Stage: Implementation Seq.No: 9 Status: ARCHIVED Archive Date: 01-Dec-2014 (P107311) Public Disclosure Authorized Country: Mozambique Approval FY: 2010 Product Line:IBRD/IDA Region: AFRICA Lending Instrument: Technical Assistance Loan Implementing Agency(ies): Key Dates Public Disclosure Copy Board Approval Date 30-Mar-2010 Original Closing Date 30-Jun-2015 Planned Mid Term Review Date 30-Jun-2013 Last Archived ISR Date 12-Jul-2014 Effectiveness Date 30-Aug-2010 Revised Closing Date 30-Jun-2015 Actual Mid Term Review Date 18-Sep-2013 Project Development Objectives Project Development Objective (from Project Appraisal Document) The Project Development Objective is to improve the capacity of local government to manage public financial resources for district development in a participatory and transparent manner. Has the Project Development Objective been changed since Board Approval of the Project? Public Disclosure Authorized Yes No Component(s) Component Name Component Cost Improving National Systems 3.20 Strengthening Participatory Planning and Budgeting 10.40 Enhancing Management and Implementation Capacity 9.20 Strengthening Oversight and Accountability 0.30 Knowledge Management 0.40 Effective Project Management and Coordination 3.90 Non-Common-Fund Activities 0.00 Public Disclosure Authorized Overall Ratings Previous Rating
    [Show full text]
  • Mozambique Country Programme Report
    Food and Agriculture Organization Mozambique Country Programme Report 2013 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS (FAO) OFFICE OF THE FAO REPRESENTATION IN MOZAMBIQUE FAO MOzAMbique AnnuAl RepORT 2013 TAble OF COnTenTs Summary .......................................................................................................................5 Country context and FAO assistance ........................................................7 SECTION 1: Country-level results ...........................................................10 1.1. Progress in achieving CPF results .................................................10 1.2. Emerging priorities - programmatic window ......................26 SECTION 2: Looking forward - Challenges, emerging opportunities and next steps.................................................28 Annex ...............................................................................................................................33 FAO Mozambique Annual Report 2013 3 ACROnyMs And AbbReviatiOns BFFS Belgian Fund for Food Security CERF Central Emergency Response Fund CPF FAO Country Programming Framework CPLP Community of Portuguese Speaking Countries DPA Provincial Directorate of Agriculture FAO Food and Agriculture Organization FFP Fisheries Support Fund FFS Farmers Field School GEF Global Environment Facility HHP Highly Hazardous Pesticides HWC Human Wildlife Conflict IFAD International Fund for Agricultural Development IFDC International Fertilizer Development Corporation INE National Statistics Institute
    [Show full text]
  • PHR Technical Report Template
    USAID AGRIFUTURO PROJECT QUARTERLY PERFORMANCE MONITORING REPORT OCTOBER 11 – DECEMBER 11 January 2012 This publication was produced by USAID AgriFUTURO for review by the United States Agency for International Development. Charlene McKoin, October 2011. Quarterly Performance Monitoring Report. Bethesda, MD: USAID AgriFUTURO project, Abt Associates Inc. Contract/Program No.: EDH-1-00-05-00005-00, Task Order No. 10 Submitted to: Elsa Mapilele, COTR Agriculture, Trade and Business Office USAID/ Mozambique Abt Associates Inc. 4550 Montgomery Avenue, Suite 800 North Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Tel: 301.347.5000. Fax: 301.913.9061 www.abtassociates.com In collaboration with: CLUSA Lda.TECHNOSERVE Wingerts Consulting SAL&CALDEIRA Lda. USAID AGRIFUTURO PROGRAM ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING REPORT DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) or the United States Government CONTENTS Contents ......................................................................................... 5 Acronyms ....................................................................................... 6 1. Executive summary ........................................................... 8 1.1 impact of the changes on project performance ................. 9 1.2 Highlights and achievements ............................................ 9 1.3 Comparison targets versus actual for selected indicators .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ecohealth Midterm Evaluation Gorongosa Restoration Project Gorongosa National Park
    ECOHEALTH ECOHEALTH MIDTERM EVALUATION GORONGOSA RESTORATION PROJECT GORONGOSA NATIONAL PARK By Lynne Gaffikin on behalf of the evaluation team October, 2013 1 Table of Contents ACRONYMS ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................... 5 GORONGOSA RESTORATION PROJECT (GRP) ............................................................................................. 5 ECOHEALTH PROGRAM ................................................................................................................................... 7 ECOHEALTH GOALS/OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................................. 9 EVALUATION PURPOSE ................................................................................................................ 11 EVALUATION METHODS ................................................................................................................................ 12 EVALUATION FINDINGS ................................................................................................................ 13 MEETING OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................................................... 13 BEST PRACTICES ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CONSERVATION STATUS of the LION (Panthera Leo) in MOZAMBIQUE
    CONSERVATION STATUS OF THE LION (Panthera leo) IN MOZAMBIQUE _ PHASE 1: PRELIMINARY SURVEY Final Report - October 2008 TITLE: Conservation status of the lion (Panthera leo) in Mozambique – Phase I: Preliminary survey CO-AUTHORS: Philippe Chardonnet, Pascal Mésochina, Pierre-Cyril Renaud, Carlos Bento, Domingo Conjo, Alessandro Fusari, Colleen Begg & Marcelino Foloma PUBLICATION: Maputo, October 2008 SUPPORTED BY: DNAC/MITUR & DNTF/MINAG FUNDED BY: SCI FOUNDATION, CAMPFIRE ASSOCIATION, DNAC/MITUR & IGF FOUNDATION KEY-WORDS: Mozambique – lion – conservation status – status review – inquiries – distribution range – abundance – hunting – conflicts ABSTRACT: The IUCN-SSC organised two regional workshops, one for West and Central Africa (2005) and one for Eastern and Southern Africa (2006), with the intention to gather major stakeholders and to produce regional conservation strategies for the lion. Mozambican authorities, together with local stakeholders, took part in the regional exercise for establishing the Regional Conservation Strategy for the Lion in Eastern and Southern Africa. They recognised the importance of establishing a National Action Plan for the Lion in Mozambique and realized the lack of comprehensive information for reviewing the lion profile in the country. A survey has been launched to update the conservation status of the lion in Mozambique. The final report of this survey is expected to become a comprehensive material for submission as a contribution to a forthcoming National Action Plan workshop. The current report is the product of only the preliminary phase of this survey. The methods used are explained and preliminary results are proposed. A database has been set up to collect and analyse the information available as well as the information generated by specific inquiries.
    [Show full text]
  • Spreading Ideas: the Integrated District Evidence-To-Action Program to Improve Maternal, Newborn and Child Health
    Spreading IDEAs: The Integrated District Evidence-to-Action Program to Improve Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Kenneth Sherr Quinhas Fernandes [email protected] [email protected] Agenda • Introduction to the IDEAs project and evaluation design (KS) • Reflections on implementation science and its link with policy (QF) IDEAs Rationale • <5 Mortality has decreased substantially, but is stagnant due to deaths in the neonatal period • MOH policies based on strong evidence, though application is uneven • PHC service utilization continues to be high – >95% 1 ANC – >70% institutional births Source: Fernandes, et al. Lancet Global Health. 2014 IDEAs Initiative Goal 1 (supported through the DDCF/African Health Initiative; https://bit.ly/3ay1lcO): Reduce neonatal mortality by improving health system capacity to deliver a package of evidence-based interventions delivered at or around the time of birth Goal 2 (supported through NIH/NICHD R01HD092449): 2a: Generate evidence on the IDEAs strategy, using the RE-AIM model to assess the program’s Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance. 2b: Via activity based micro-costing and health outcomes modeling, estimate the potential budget and program impact from the payer perspective to scale-up IDEAs compared to the standard of care Central Mozambique – Manica & Sofala Provinces IDEAs Audit & Feedback Implementation Strategy Step 2: Audit and Feedback Meetings* Step 1: Facility & • 2 mtg per year per District Readiness 12 districts Assessment Iterative, • Performance • 2 cycles per year cyclical reviewed per 12 districts audit and • Action plans • Data Quality Audits feedback developed (& • Service Readiness updated) Assessments • Low and high performing facilities identified Step 3: Targeted Facility Support* • Action Plans Reviewed • Mentoring visits • Facility Support Grants *Led by District Health Management Teams, with support from Provincial leadership & external facilitation IDEAs A&F Districts 12 districts (of 25) and 154 facilities (of 269) in Manica and Sofala provinces 2015 Pop.
    [Show full text]