Waxcaps and Grassland Fungi
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Systematics, Barcoding and Ecology of Fungi from Waxcap Grasslands in Britain
Project report to DEFRA 1: 3 December 2010 Systematics, barcoding and ecology of fungi from waxcap grasslands in Britain Collaborations An important component of the project is to bring together professional scientists and specialist volunteers to contribute specimens and ecological data, and later on to explore ways of improving the existing recording and monitoring schemes. The project will provide valuable data to aid decision-making for conservation management, for example designation of SSSIs and establishment of red data lists. The first action was therefore to publicize the project to potential collaborators, and emails and verbal communications took place both directly with known collectors/recording groups and through the British Mycological Society. Excluding those named in the project application, 33 individuals/recording groups have provided specimens and/or identification data. Our initial request was for all species of Hygrocybe and Geoglossaceae. While a number of these are common and widespread, there are concerns that existing species concepts are too broad and are masking cryptic taxa. Along with specimens that we have collected ourselves, we have received a total of 213 collections belonging to 34 species/varieties of Hygrocybe and four species of Geoglossaceae. The collections have come from 27 different vice-counties in England, Wales and Scotland. Much of the field season was poor for waxcap species, although a number of species fruited abnormally late in the year. With this in mind, we are very happy with the response we have received from field workers, and there has been a widespread welcome for our project. We are confident that our field collaborators will continue to support our work throughout the project period and beyond. -
LUNDY FUNGI: FURTHER SURVEYS 2004-2008 by JOHN N
Journal of the Lundy Field Society, 2, 2010 LUNDY FUNGI: FURTHER SURVEYS 2004-2008 by JOHN N. HEDGER1, J. DAVID GEORGE2, GARETH W. GRIFFITH3, DILUKA PEIRIS1 1School of Life Sciences, University of Westminster, 115 New Cavendish Street, London, W1M 8JS 2Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD 3Institute of Biological Environmental and Rural Sciences, University of Aberystwyth, SY23 3DD Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The results of four five-day field surveys of fungi carried out yearly on Lundy from 2004-08 are reported and the results compared with the previous survey by ourselves in 2003 and to records made prior to 2003 by members of the LFS. 240 taxa were identified of which 159 appear to be new records for the island. Seasonal distribution, habitat and resource preferences are discussed. Keywords: Fungi, ecology, biodiversity, conservation, grassland INTRODUCTION Hedger & George (2004) published a list of 108 taxa of fungi found on Lundy during a five-day survey carried out in October 2003. They also included in this paper the records of 95 species of fungi made from 1970 onwards, mostly abstracted from the Annual Reports of the Lundy Field Society, and found that their own survey had added 70 additional records, giving a total of 156 taxa. They concluded that further surveys would undoubtedly add to the database, especially since the autumn of 2003 had been exceptionally dry, and as a consequence the fruiting of the larger fleshy fungi on Lundy, especially the grassland species, had been very poor, resulting in under-recording. Further five-day surveys were therefore carried out each year from 2004-08, three in the autumn, 8-12 November 2004, 4-9 November 2007, 3-11 November 2008, one in winter, 23-27 January 2006 and one in spring, 9-16 April 2005. -
As I Mentioned in the Spring Edition, the Aim Is to Produce Our News
Some thoughts on the HFSG News Sheet President & Recorder: Ted Blackwell As I mentioned in the Spring issue News Sheet, the tel. 01568 780480; aim is now to try to produce an issue twice per e-mail: [email protected] year. This would seem to work out as publications in: Chair & Secretary: Sheila Spence . late April/early May, covering the September – tel. 01531 631736; February forays; e-mail: [email protected] . late September/early October, covering the March – August forays. Treasurer: Ray Bray tel. 01531 670301 Both the last issue and this current one rely very e-mail: [email protected] heavily on contributions from Ted and Ray, to whom I am most grateful for their willing(?) submission to blackmail! It would be pleasing, CHAIRMAN’S MESSAGE though, if our News Sheet reflected more widely the talents, as well as the wishes, of the whole Group The Spring foraying season started with great and I hope that future issues will increasingly do enthusiasm: it was great to be out in the woods this. again! My first season as Chairman has gone smoothly, due to the great support of members - in It is, I think, desirable to keep both the size and particular Shelly and Mike, for leading the foray to content of these News Sheets as flexible as Netherwood and, of course, Ted for his continuing, possible. However, each issue will, hopefully, unstinting help and guidance. We have had some contain, as a common denominator: really good forays so far: thank you, Ted, for giving us all the info. on the exciting finds we have made. -
No. 20 July 2020 a Journal on Biodiversity
a journal on biodiversity, taxonomy and conservation of fungi No. 20 July 2020 Gliophorus psittacinus, Javorníky, Petrovice – Medvedie, 3 November 2018, F. Fuljer (PHFF10416). Photo F. Fuljer. ISSN 1335-7670 Catathelasma 20: 1–68 (2020) April 20 Catathelasma 20 3 Catathelasma Catathelasma is a scientific journal published by the Slovak Mycological Society with the financial support of the Slovak Academy of Sciences Editor in chief: Viktor Kučera Editorial board: Pavel Lizoň & Soňa Jančovičová Graphic and Cover Design: Erika Pisarčíková Back issue of Catathelasma can be accessed at www.mykospol.sk/ publikacna-cinnost/ Table of Contents Hygrocybe (genera Hygrocybe, Gliophorus, Porpolomopsis and Cuphophyllus) in northwestern Slovakia, part III. Filip Fuljer, Milan Zajac, Zuzana Václavová & Ivona Kautmanová. 5 Gliophorus reginae, Javorníky, Petrovice – Škápová, 27 October 2017, F. Fuljer (PHFF10008). Photo M. Zajac. Perrotia flammea (Helotiales) in Slovakia Adam Polhorský & Ján Červenka. 57 Editor‘s Acknowledgements The Editor express his appreciation to Vladimír Kunca (Technical univerzity in Zvolen, Slovakia), Kadri Pärtel (University of Tartu, Estonia), Eugene Popov (Komarov Botanical Institute, RAS, St. Petersburg, Russia) and Hana Ševčíková (Moravian Museum, Brno, Czech Republic) who have, prior to the acceptance for publication, reviewed, read and commented contributions included in this issue. ISSN , Javorníky, Makov – Holákovci, Hygrocybe pratensis var. pallida 1335-7670 23 September 2017, F. Fuljer (PHFF10034). Photo F. Fuljer. 4 Catathelasma 20 April 2020 April 20 Catathelasma 20 5 Instructions to Authors HYGROCYBE (GENERA HYGROCYBE, GLIOPHORUS, Catathelasma publishes original and reviewed contributions to the better knowledge PORPOLOMOPSIS AND CUPHOPHYLLUS) IN NORTHWESTERN of fungi preferably in Slovakia and central Europe. Papers should be on diversity (my- SLOVAKIA, PART III. -
Pt Reyes Species As of 12-1-2017 Abortiporus Biennis Agaricus
Pt Reyes Species as of 12-1-2017 Abortiporus biennis Agaricus augustus Agaricus bernardii Agaricus californicus Agaricus campestris Agaricus cupreobrunneus Agaricus diminutivus Agaricus hondensis Agaricus lilaceps Agaricus praeclaresquamosus Agaricus rutilescens Agaricus silvicola Agaricus subrutilescens Agaricus xanthodermus Agrocybe pediades Agrocybe praecox Alboleptonia sericella Aleuria aurantia Alnicola sp. Amanita aprica Amanita augusta Amanita breckonii Amanita calyptratoides Amanita constricta Amanita gemmata Amanita gemmata var. exannulata Amanita calyptraderma Amanita calyptraderma (white form) Amanita magniverrucata Amanita muscaria Amanita novinupta Amanita ocreata Amanita pachycolea Amanita pantherina Amanita phalloides Amanita porphyria Amanita protecta Amanita velosa Amanita smithiana Amaurodon sp. nova Amphinema byssoides gr. Annulohypoxylon thouarsianum Anthrocobia melaloma Antrodia heteromorpha Aphanobasidium pseudotsugae Armillaria gallica Armillaria mellea Armillaria nabsnona Arrhenia epichysium Pt Reyes Species as of 12-1-2017 Arrhenia retiruga Ascobolus sp. Ascocoryne sarcoides Astraeus hygrometricus Auricularia auricula Auriscalpium vulgare Baeospora myosura Balsamia cf. magnata Bisporella citrina Bjerkandera adusta Boidinia propinqua Bolbitius vitellinus Suillellus (Boletus) amygdalinus Rubroboleus (Boletus) eastwoodiae Boletus edulis Boletus fibrillosus Botryobasidium longisporum Botryobasidium sp. Botryobasidium vagum Bovista dermoxantha Bovista pila Bovista plumbea Bulgaria inquinans Byssocorticium californicum -
Hans Halbwachs
Hans Halbwachs hat are fungal characteristics Moreover, the variability of spore traits in winter. It has been speculated that good for? Well, for identifying is bewildering (as was discussed by Else this may be a strategy to avoid predators fungi, of course! Field Vellinga in the previous issue of FUNGI). (Halbwachs et al., 2016), though this Wmycologists all over the world are living Size, ornamentation, and pigmentation would imply investment, e.g., into encyclopedias when it comes to fungal occur in all combinations (Fig. 2). These antifreeze substances and producing traits. Even the most subtle differences are the visible characteristics which may relatively small fruit bodies, as in in spore size or cap coloration have their be grouped in (1) morphological (shape, Flammulina velutipes or Hygrophorus place in identifying mushrooms and size) and (2) physiological (pigments, hypothejus. Generally, species fruiting other fungi. Quite many mycologists are taste, smell, toxicity, etc.). A third, more in late autumn seem to have larger intrigued by the endless variations, for mysterious trait, is the phenology of fruit fruit bodies, at least in Cortinarius instance of fruit bodies (Fig. 1). bodies. Some do it in spring, some even (Halbwachs, 2018). Figure 1. Examples of basidiomycete fruit body shapes and colors. From left to right top: Amanita flavoconia (courtesy J. Veitch), Lactarius indigo (courtesy A. Rockefeller), Butyriboletus frostii (courtesy D. Molter); bottom: Calostoma cinnabarinum (courtesy D. Molter), Tricholomopsis decora (courtesy W. Sturgeon), Mycena adonis (courtesy D. Molter). creativecommons. org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en. 18 FUNGI Volume 12:1 Spring 2019 Knockin’ on Evolution’s Door Although some ideas are circulating about the functionality of fungal traits, mycologists want to know more about their ecological implications. -
And Interspecific Hybridiation in Agaric Fungi
Mycologia, 105(6), 2013, pp. 1577–1594. DOI: 10.3852/13-041 # 2013 by The Mycological Society of America, Lawrence, KS 66044-8897 Evolutionary consequences of putative intra- and interspecific hybridization in agaric fungi Karen W. Hughes1 to determine the outcome of hybridization events. Ronald H. Petersen Within Armillaria mellea and Amanita citrina f. Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of lavendula, we found evidence of interbreeding and Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996-1100 recombination. Within G. dichrous and H. flavescens/ D. Jean Lodge chlorophana, hybrids were identified but there was Center for Forest Mycology Research, USDA-Forest no evidence for F2 or higher progeny in natural Service, Northern Research Station, Box 137, Luquillo, populations suggesting that the hybrid fruitbodies Puerto Rico 00773-1377 might be an evolutionary dead end and that the Sarah E. Bergemann genetically divergent Mendelian populations from which they were derived are, in fact, different species. Middle Tennessee State University, Department of Biology, PO Box 60, Murfreesboro Tennessee 37132 The association between ITS haplotype divergence of less than 5% (Armillaria mellea 5 2.6% excluding Kendra Baumgartner gaps; Amanita citrina f. lavendula 5 3.3%) with the USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Department of presence of putative recombinants and greater than Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, California 95616 5% (Gymnopus dichrous 5 5.7%; Hygrocybe flavescens/ chlorophana 5 14.1%) with apparent failure of F1 2 Rodham E. Tulloss hybrids to produce F2 or higher progeny in popula- PO Box 57, Roosevelt, New Jersey 08555-0057 tions may suggest a correlation between genetic Edgar Lickey distance and reproductive isolation. -
Species of Hygrocybe Subgenus Cuphophyllus Hygrophorus Flavipes
PERS OONIA Published by the Rijksherbarium, Leiden 43-46 Volume 14, Part 1, pp. (1989) Notes on Hygrophoraceae — XI. Observations on some species of Hygrocybe subgenus Cuphophyllus Eef Arnolds Biological Station, Wijster (Drente), Netherlands* The nomenclature of the violaceous of grey species Hygrocybe subgenus Cuphophyllus and the taxonomic position of H. subradiata are discussed. One new species is described and onenew combination is made, viz. Hygrocybe radiata and H. flavipes. In Europe usually two species with a grey violaceous to lilac pileus are distinguished within Hygrocybe subgenus Cuphophyllus Donk (= Camarophyllus sensu auct.), named H. subvio- lacea (Peck) Orton & Watl. and H. lacmus (Schum.) Orton & Watl. The former species is characterized by an entirely white stipe and aromatic smell, whereas the latter species has a yellow base of stipe and no characteristic smell. Recently, Raid& Boertmann (1988) demonstrated that the name Agaricus lacmus Schum. has been since Schumacher did mention (1803: 333) currently misinterpreted not a yellow base of stipe in the original description and an unpublished, authentic plate by that author shows white lacmus Schum. is an entirely stipe. Consequently, Agaricus an earlier synonym ofHygrophorus subviolaceus Peck (1900: 82) and H. lacmus sensu auct. (with a yellow stipe base) should have a new name. According to Raid & Boertmann (1988) the oldest available name is Hygrophorus flavipes Britz. This epithet was not yet combinedin Hygrocybe and thereforethe following combina- tion is proposed: Hygrocybe flavipes (Britz.) Arnolds, comb. nov. — Basionym: Hygrophorus flavipes Britz., Hymenomyc. Stidbayern 8: 10, fig. 69. 1891. Some authors (Clemengon, 1982; Bon, 1984) distinguished two species with a yellow base of stipe, differing in spore size only: Camarophyllus lacmus sensu C16mengon with ellip- soid to lacrimiform of 6.5-8 x 4.5-6 and C. -
A MYCOLEGIUM of LITERATURE the New North America Mushroom Species of 2015 Else C
Cortinarius vanduzerensis, from the type locality in Oregon, unmistakable with its and the species, growing with slimy dark brown cap, Pseudotsuga, Tsuga and Abies in and slimy lilac-purple Oregon, Washington, and British stem, right? Alas, it is Columbia has been described now postulated that this as Cortinarius seidliae. Images species is only known courtesy of M. G. Wood and N. Siegel. A MYCOLEGIUM OF LITERATURE The new North America mushroom species of 2015 Else C. Vellinga round 30 new North American species of macrofungi they are in general very difficult to recognize anyway; without saw the light in 2015 – leaving 2014 as the top year pictures for comparison it is just impossible. with 58 species. In 2015, 14 new Cortinarius species, To speed up the description of new species, several Aan Entoloma, one wax cap, two Russulas, one bolete, several journals now offer the opportunity to publish single species polypores, two Craterellus species, one Geastrum, an descriptions as part of a much bigger article in which many Auricularia, and a number of Tremella species were presented different authors each describe only one or a few new species. as new, plus two Otidea species representing the Ascomycota. Several of the new Cortinarius and Russula species were As in 2014, many of the new taxa were published in Index published as part of these big community efforts. For the Fungorum, without any supporting illustrations and without individual author this is advantageous, as there will be more phylogenetic trees showing the placement of the new species. citations of the whole article than for a single species article. -
Fungi on Lundy 2003
Rep. Lundy Field Soc. 53 FUNGI ON LUNDY 2003 By JOHN N . H EDGER 1 AND J. D AVID GEORGE2 'School of Biosciences,University of Westminster, 115 New Cavendish Street, London, WlM 8JS 2Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD Dedication: The authors wish to dedicate this paper to Professor John Webst er of the University of Exeter on the occasion of his 80'" birthday, in recognition of his contribution to the Mycology of Southwest Britain. ABSTRACT The results of a preliminary field survey of fungi can·ied out on Lundy between 11-18 October 2003 are reported and compared with previous records. One hundred and eight taxa were identified of which seventy five appear to be new records for the island, in spite of the very dry conditions during the survey. Habitat and resource preferences of the fungi are discussed, and suggesti ons made for further studies on Lundy. Keywords: Lundy, fungi, ecology, biodiversity. INTRODUCTION Although detailed studies of the lichen fl ora of Lundy have been published (Noon & Hawksworth, 1972; lames et al., 1995, 1996), the fungi of Lundy have remained little studied. Mcist existing data consisted of a series of lists published in the Annual Report s of the Lundy Field Society, beginning in 1970. We could onl y trace three earli er records of fungi on Lundy, from 1965 and 1967, by visiting members of the British Mycological Society. The obj ect of the present study was to start a more systematic in ventory of the diversity of fungi on Lundy, and the habitats they occupy on the island, and to begin a database of Lundy fungi for entry in the British Mycological Society U.K. -
Aktualny Stan Wiedzy O Grzybach Chronionych W Świetle Zmienionych Aktów Prawnych I Stwierdzonych Nowych Gatunków I Stanowisk Na Terenie Pienińskiego Parku Narodowego
Pieniny – Przyroda i Człowiek 14: 91–100 (2016) Aktualny stan wiedzy o grzybach chronionych w świetle zmienionych aktów prawnych i stwierdzonych nowych gatunków i stanowisk na terenie Pienińskiego Parku Narodowego The current state of knowledge about protected fungi after the changes in law and identification of new species and localities in the Pieniny National Park Piotr Chachuła Pieniński Park Narodowy, ul. Jagiellońska 107b, 34-450 Krościenko n. Dunajcem e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. This paper includes data on localities of 38 species of non-lichenized protected fungi occurring in the Pieniny National Park. The species have been categorized as endangered and rare both in Poland and in Polish part of the Carpathians. This work is a complement and verification of knowledge on pro- tected fungi of this area after changes to law made in 2014. The paper pro- vides detailed data on localities of 18 species, including Discina fastigiata, Hygrophorus erubescens, Inonotus obliquus, Skeletocutis odora and Tricholoma aurantium, species that have not been observed in the area so far. Additional 13 species are fungi which had been recorded from the PPN before, however, after changes to the law they achieved the status of protected or new data on their localities were collected. The author also compared the fungal abun- dance and species richness of the PPN to selected national parks located in the southern Poland. Key words: Macrofungi, rare species, protected fungi, Polish Carpathians, Poland. Wstęp i wymierające w skali Polski (Wojewoda, Ław- rynowicz 2006) i 16 w skali polskich Karpat Na terenie Pienińskiego Parku Narodowego (Wojewoda 1991); niektóre gatunki chronione (PPN) do 2015 roku stwierdzono 1041 gatunków zamieszczone są na obu czerwonych listach. -
Chemical Elements in Ascomycetes and Basidiomycetes
Chemical elements in Ascomycetes and Basidiomycetes The reference mushrooms as instruments for investigating bioindication and biodiversity Roberto Cenci, Luigi Cocchi, Orlando Petrini, Fabrizio Sena, Carmine Siniscalco, Luciano Vescovi Editors: R. M. Cenci and F. Sena EUR 24415 EN 2011 1 The mission of the JRC-IES is to provide scientific-technical support to the European Union’s policies for the protection and sustainable development of the European and global environment. European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Via E.Fermi, 2749 I-21027 Ispra (VA) Italy Legal Notice Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of this publication. Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers or these calls may be billed. A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server http://europa.eu/ JRC Catalogue number: LB-NA-24415-EN-C Editors: R. M. Cenci and F. Sena JRC65050 EUR 24415 EN ISBN 978-92-79-20395-4 ISSN 1018-5593 doi:10.2788/22228 Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union Translation: Dr. Luca Umidi © European Union, 2011 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged Printed in Italy 2 Attached to this document is a CD containing: • A PDF copy of this document • Information regarding the soil and mushroom sampling site locations • Analytical data (ca, 300,000) on total samples of soils and mushrooms analysed (ca, 10,000) • The descriptive statistics for all genera and species analysed • Maps showing the distribution of concentrations of inorganic elements in mushrooms • Maps showing the distribution of concentrations of inorganic elements in soils 3 Contact information: Address: Roberto M.