Korea Morning Focus

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Korea Morning Focus December 20, 2019 Korea Morning Focus Sector News & Analysis Major Indices Close Chg Chg (%) Securities (Overweight) KOSPI 2,196.56 1.80 0.08 A framework for the valuation of financial platforms KOSPI 200 294.31 0.09 0.03 KOSDAQ 647.85 -1.10 -0.17 Turnover ('000 shares, Wbn) Volume Value KOSPI 630,988 5,262 KOSPI 200 68,970 3,253 KOSDAQ 794,480 3,734 Market Cap (Wbn) Value KOSPI 1,476,810 KOSDAQ 233,526 KOSPI Turnover (Wbn) Buy Sell Net Foreign 1,643 1,393 249 Institutional 1,101 1,209 -108 Retail 2,459 2,623 -164 KOSDAQ Turnover (Wbn) Buy Sell Net Foreign 421 443 -22 Institutional 196 193 3 Retail 3,097 3,049 48 Program Buy / Sell (Wbn) Buy Sell Net KOSPI 1,320 1,165 154 KOSDAQ 381 399 -18 Advances & Declines Advances Declines Unchanged KOSPI 423 373 111 KOSDAQ 516 727 98 KOSPI Top 5 Most Active Stocks by Value (Wbn) Price (W) Chg (W) Value Samsung Electronics 56,000 -300 786 Hynix 93,600 600 441 KODEX Leverage 14,080 30 197 KODEX Kosdaq150 7,920 60 185 Leverage Seowon 2,750 235 182 KOSDAQ Top 5 Most Active Stocks by Value (Wbn) Price (W) Chg (W) Value MedPacto 35,900 -4,100 227 Estech Pharma 17,000 700 125 S-MAC 1,185 269 110 HLB 98,900 -100 72 Hanryu A.I Center 1,355 45 71 Note: As of December 19, 2019 This document is a summary of a report prepared by Mirae Asset Daewoo Co., Ltd. (“Mirae Asset Daewoo”) and published on our website. Please review the compliance notices contained in the original report. Information and opinions contained herein have been compiled in good faith from sources deemed to be reliable. However, the information has not been independently verified. Mirae Asset Daewoo makes no guarantee, representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the fairness, accuracy or completeness of the information and opinions contained in this document. Mirae Asset Daewoo accepts no responsibility or liability whatsoever for any loss arising from the use of this document or its contents or otherwise arising in connection therewith. Information and opinions contained herein are subject to change without notice. This document is for informational purposes only. It is not and should not be construed as an offer or solicitation of an offer to purchase or sell any securities or other financial instruments. This document may not be reproduced, further distributed or published in whole or in part for any purpose. Securities A framework for the valuation of financial platforms Competition among financial platforms getting underway Overweight (Maintain) Financial platform businesses to gather steam in 2020 Industry Report Moves to launch and bulk up financial platforms are gathering steam. Such December 20, 2019 moves include the recent licensing of a third internet-only bank, the resumption of Kakao’s major shareholder eligibility screening in relation to its acquisition of a brokerage firm, the establishment and equity issue of NAVER Financial, and Kakao Bank’s additional capital raising. Mirae Asset Daewoo Co., Ltd. We believe the full-fledged launch of these powerful platforms will bring a [Securities/Insurance] sea change in the financial industry by replacing or building on traditional financial channels. Gil-won Jeong +822-3774-1675 [email protected] A framework for valuing financial platforms is needed Minjeong Kyeong In 2H20, we expect the debate over the fair valuation of financial platforms to +822-3774-1437 heat up as Kakao Bank’s IPO comes into focus. [email protected] How to reflect the dual nature of the financial business and the platform business in valuations is an important topic. Financial platform valuation The characteristics of both platforms and finance need to be reflected The starting point of valuation for all assets is the discount rate on government bonds (risk-free rate of return), which rely on an extensive and stable source of income (i.e., taxing power). An asset with exclusivity and limited risks deserves a discount rate comparable to that of government bonds. We believe platforms represent such an asset, as they are used by all economically active people, tend to be exclusive, and have the ability to generate stable income from various sources (ads, commissions, etc.). Unlike general platforms, however, financial platforms are associated with risks inherent to the financial business (credit risks, price fluctuations, etc.) and thus warrant a higher discount. For this reason, we believe the “low discount rate = high valuation” approach can be justified in cases where the financial platform is closer to an intermediary model, limiting exposure to inherent financial business risks while maximizing the benefits of platforms. Figure 1. Platforms share certain characteristics with public assets Governments Platforms Monopoly Profits, Public efficiency interest Broad (ads, commissions) (taxes) participation Source: Mirae Asset Daewoo Research Analysts who prepared this report are registered as research analysts in Korea but not in any other jurisdiction, including the U.S. PLEASE SEE ANALYST CERTIFICATIONS AND IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES & DISCLAIMERS IN APPENDIX 1 AT THE END OF REPORT. December 20, 2019 Securities Three case studies WeBank, owned by Tencent, is China’s largest digital bank. It acts as an intermediary between Tencent users and banks. WeBank has an optimal income structure, with direct lending accounting for 20% and the rest coming from loan brokerage, commissions, and interest (with similar proportions). WeBank has been valued at a P/B of 12x (based on the digital bank’s minority stake sale in late 2018). MarketAxess Holdings is a fixed-income trading platform that is based on a risk- free intermediary model. The company trades at a P/B of more than 20x, which is justified by its over 30% ROE and implies a discount rate of just 1.5%. PayPal earns 90% of its income from commissions. With an ROE of 16%, the company trades at a P/B of 7.5x, implying a discount rate of 2%. PayPal is an ideal financial platform characterized by an extensive customer base, low risk reliance, and high ROE. Valuation framework A central issue in 2020 will be the need to better incorporate the value of financial platforms in the valuations of entities investing in them (big platforms and financial companies with investment stakes). It is important to establish a basic framework when evaluating a new asset. For financial platforms, we present the following three criteria: 1) Exclusive and extensive user base 2) Intermediary model with limited exposure to inherent financial business risks 3) High ROE Figure 2. Framework for valuing financial platforms Big tech Financial institutions Sales Capital channels Partnerships (JVs) Risk MyData management Innovation Expertise Valuation Secure exclusivity and extensive user base Adopt an intermediary model to reduce financial risks Obtain high ROE Source: Mirae Asset Daewoo Research Mirae Asset Daewoo Research Mirae Asset Daewoo Research Key Universe Valuations December 20, 2019 ※All data as of close December 18, 2019, unless otherwise noted. 19F Earnings growth Mkt Cap Price P/E (x) P/B (x) ROE (%) Ticker Company Div Yield OP EPS (Wbn) (W) (%) 19F 20F 19F 20F 19F 20F 19F 20F 19F 20F 005930 Samsung Electronics 334,308 56,000 2.5 -54.3 40.3 -47.7 35.9 17.8 13.1 1.5 1.4 8.6 10.8 000660 SK Hynix 68,141 93,600 1.6 -85.8 150.5 -85.5 140.0 30.2 12.6 1.3 1.2 4.7 10.7 035420 NAVER 29,502 179,000 0.2 -17.8 77.0 -47.3 132.4 86.3 37.2 4.3 3.9 6.3 13.4 005380 Hyundai Motor 26,388 123,500 3.2 49.6 41.9 118.5 48.0 10.6 7.1 0.5 0.4 4.7 6.6 012330 Hyundai Mobis 24,875 261,000 1.9 17.9 16.4 24.3 17.1 10.8 9.2 0.8 0.7 7.3 7.9 068270 Celltrion 23,165 180,500 - - - - 0.0 0.0 051910 LG Chem 21,813 309,000 1.3 -55.7 70.9 -72.5 164.0 59.7 22.6 1.4 1.3 2.4 6.1 055550 Shinhan Financial Group 21,552 45,450 12.3 3.9 10.0 -0.2 6.2 6.2 0.5 0.5 9.1 8.4 005490 POSCO 21,492 246,500 4.5 -23.9 -9.2 37.8 -0.3 9.2 9.3 0.5 0.4 5.3 5.1 105560 KB Financial Group 20,655 49,400 9.3 2.3 12.6 0.9 6.0 5.9 0.5 0.5 9.2 8.5 028260 Samsung C&T 20,392 107,500 1.9 -27.7 39.8 -42.8 17.9 21.0 17.8 0.7 0.6 4.0 3.9 051900 LG H&H 19,773 1,266,000 0.9 12.8 9.7 16.5 10.7 24.9 22.4 5.4 4.6 20.3 19.1 017670 SK Telecom 19,621 243,000 4.1 7.3 -3.5 -60.6 68.2 15.9 9.5 0.8 0.7 5.4 8.8 015760 KEPCO 18,232 28,400 - - - - - 148.7 0.3 0.3 - 0.2 000270 Kia Motors 18,120 44,700 2.0 70.4 29.1 79.8 24.5 8.7 7.0 0.6 0.6 7.4 8.5 034730 SK Holdings 18,083 257,000 1.9 -2.8 21.5 -36.6 11.0 12.8 11.5 0.9 0.9 8.2 8.3 006400 Samsung SDI 15,713 228,500 0.4 -33.0 108.9 -38.3 99.8 37.2 18.6 1.2 1.2 3.5 6.7 032830 Samsung Life 15,280 76,400 - - - - 0.0 0.0 018260 Samsung SDS 15,050 194,500 1.3 10.4 12.3 10.3 11.8 21.7 19.4 2.3 2.1 11.1 11.3 096770 SK Innovation 14,055 152,000 4.2 -42.8 18.2 -68.7 92.4 27.6 14.3 0.7 0.7 2.8 5.4 033780 KT&G 13,359 97,300 4.3 12.8 5.6 17.5 5.1 12.6 12.0 1.5 1.4 12.7 12.6 035720 Kakao 12,932 150,000 0.1 184.6 138.3 226.0 114.7 75.1 35.0 2.4 2.3 3.2 6.7 003550 LG Corp.
Recommended publications
  • Hassle-Free EV Charging Solutions
    A Lotte Invested Company AI and Computer Vision Smart EV Charging System Hassle-free EV Charging Solutions Classified Document. © 2019 oneCHARGE Solutions Limited. All rights reserved. ABOUT oneCHARGE Established 2017 From Hong Kong and now in Korea Expanding rapidly in Asia Hong Kong, Macau and Korea and some Asia location Strong reference Invested and co-operating with Lotte Group World’s first Computer Vision + AI Huge analytics data + customer engaging solutions Bridge between properties & client Transform the demand of EV charging into revenue & important analytics data WHAT WE DO EV Charging Application Open management Systems with payment solution with analytics INNOVATION Auto. Charging Experience Computer Vision & AI Based Load-balancing Automation - PATENTED Customer Analytics System Technology Load balancing maximizes number of EV chargers intelligently. Successful Case Significantly reduce the wait time Expansion in progress Satisfy charging demand Huge amount of analytics Providing tones of information for management and customers marketing No-longer endless promotion Payment system and management system ready for real-operation Residential Installation No more waiting or queue Sharing to other users Income in vacant time Trackable usage record Everything is trackable Perfect scenario of EV driving Case Study PROBLEMS After meetings with Lotte Management, they are facing Long waiting and Expensive Can only serve 1 Very Complicated Charging time to deploy car per charger Operation PROBLEMS Lack of chargers Takes up huge Requires
    [Show full text]
  • Good Morning Vietnam
    February 25, 2021 Good Morning Vietnam To subscribe to our report, please contact us at [email protected] Market performance VIETNAM STOCK MARKET Last trade 1D (%) 1M (%) 1Y (%) VN-INDEX 1,162.01 -1.33 -0.35 27.74 Sharp drop with foreign continued outflow HNX 237.89 -0.37 2.61 123.03 Vietnam stock market saw a sudden drop amid foreign investors continued their net selling UPCOM 76.22 -0.32 -1.55 37.27 on the 3rd consecutive day. VN-Index maintained a slight gain during the morning with MSCI EM 1,376.76 -1.53 -2.37 30.31 sideways trend and steady trading volume. After lunch break, the index suddenly fell while NIKKEI 30,190.71 1.75 4.75 33.56 the volume jumped. Despite seeing somewhat recovery, VN-Index still recorded a HANG SENG 29,718.24 -2.99 -1.46 10.50 significant loss of 15.63 points (-1.33% DoD) to closed at 1,162.01 points. The trading KOSPI 3,053.73 1.96 -4.84 45.17 volume and value maintained high at 603mn shares (flat DoD) and VND15,017bn (-2.62% FTSE 6,658.97 0.50 0.30 -5.11 DoD). S&P 500 3,925.43 1.14 2.19 21.69 Banks and Real Estates stocks was the main cause of market decrease as VHM (-2.37%), NASDAQ 13,597.97 0.99 0.41 47.46 VCB (-1.90%), VIC (-1.64%), GVR (-3.68%), BID (-2.16%) plunged. Valuation Overseas investors recorded a net-selling worth of VND684.62bn on HOSE.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes and Continued Growth of Foreign Investment
    The Top 20 Korean Multinationals: Changes and Continued Growth of Foreign Investment Seoul and New York, March 5, 2015 Graduate School of International Studies at Seoul National University in Seoul, and the Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI), a joint center of the Columbia Law School and the Earth Institute at Columbia University in New York, are releasing the results of their survey of Korean multinationals today. The survey, conducted during 2014, is part of a long-term study of the rapid global expansion of multinational enterprises (MNEs) from emerging markets.1 The research for this report was conducted in 2014 and covers the period from 2011 to 2013.2 Highlights In 2013, the top 20 Korean multinationals, ranked by their foreign assets (See Table 1), jointly held US$68.9 billion assets abroad.3 Most firms were subsidiaries of Korea’s eight leading business groups (or chaebols), including Samsung, POSCO, LG, Hyundai Heavy Industries, Hyundai-Kia Motors, SK, Lotte, and Hyosung Group. Five out of the 20 multinationals were also included in UNCTAD’s “Top 100 non-financial TNCs from developing and transition economies” in 2012.4 The average age of the top 20 firms is about 47 years, which is two times the average age of Korea’s top 1,000 firms (ranked in terms of total assets). There is a high concentration by the top players in the list in terms of foreign assets. Among the top 20 companies, Samsung Electronics, POSCO, and Hyundai Motor Company ranked in the top three in that order. There was a significant difference between first and second place, with the foreign assets of Samsung Electronics more than doubling that of POSCO.
    [Show full text]
  • Korea Morning Focus
    February 7, 2020 Korea Morning Focus Company News & Analysis Major Indices Close Chg Chg (%) KB Financial Group (105560/Buy/TP: W63,000) KOSPI 2,227.94 62.31 2.88 Doing the best to enhance shareholder value during challenging times KOSPI 200 300.65 8.63 2.96 KOSDAQ 672.69 11.37 1.72 Korean Air (003490/Trading Buy/TP: W30,000) Disappointing results, when adjusting for accounting changes Turnover ('000 shares, Wbn) Volume Value KT (030200/Buy/TP: W36,500) KOSPI 683,230 8,335 5G-driven recovery continues KOSPI 200 108,722 5,351 KOSDAQ 927,730 4,609 Lotte Data Communication (286940/Buy/TP: W63,000) Market Cap (Wbn) Earnings dented by project delays Value KOSPI 1,501,461 KOSDAQ 243,440 KOSPI Turnover (Wbn) Buy Sell Net Foreign 2,192 2,040 152 Institutional 2,039 1,523 517 Retail 4,040 4,728 -688 KOSDAQ Turnover (Wbn) Buy Sell Net Foreign 561 495 66 Institutional 200 241 -41 Retail 3,807 3,830 -23 Program Buy / Sell (Wbn) Buy Sell Net KOSPI 1,795 1,495 301 KOSDAQ 523 478 44 Advances & Declines Advances Declines Unchanged KOSPI 733 130 43 KOSDAQ 996 263 87 KOSPI Top 5 Most Active Stocks by Value (Wbn) Price (W) Chg (W) Value Samsung Electronics 61,100 1,600 886 KODEX Leverage 14,960 845 496 Shin Poong Pharm. 9,970 1,420 488 KODEX 200 Futures 5,800 -380 363 Inverse 2X KIC Ltd 2,975 480 314 KOSDAQ Top 5 Most Active Stocks by Value (Wbn) Price (W) Chg (W) Value Celltrion Healthcare 58,900 3,000 164 LabGen 8,210 640 146 HLB 104,500 6,600 131 HDI21 5,310 1,220 125 Welcron 6,240 -500 122 Note: As of February 06, 2020 This document is a summary of a report prepared by Mirae Asset Daewoo Co., Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents >
    < TABLE OF CONTENTS > 1. Greetings .................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 2. Company Profile ........................................................................................................................................................................ 3 A. Overview ........................................................................................................................................................................... 3 B. Status of Registration ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 3. Organization .............................................................................................................................................................................. 8 A. Organization chart ............................................................................................................................................................. 8 B. Analysis of Engineers ........................................................................................................................................................ 9 C. List of Professional Engineers......................................................................................................................................... 10 D. Professional Engineer in Civil Eng.(U.S.A) ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Korea Morning Focus
    October 22, 2019 Korea Morning Focus Sector News & Analysis Major Indices Close Chg Chg (%) Mobile Components (Overweight) KOSPI 2,064.84 4.15 0.20 IT Corporate Day review: Why now is the time to buy smartphone KOSPI 200 273.79 0.98 0.36 component stocks KOSDAQ 649.18 2.49 0.39 Turnover ('000 shares, Wbn) Volume Value KOSPI 600,283 3,598 KOSPI 200 44,907 1,946 KOSDAQ 754,168 4,694 Market Cap (Wbn) Value KOSPI 1,381,669 KOSDAQ 228,312 KOSPI Turnover (Wbn) Buy Sell Net Foreign 775 896 -121 Institutional 750 696 54 Retail 2,037 1,992 45 KOSDAQ Turnover (Wbn) Buy Sell Net Foreign 407 426 -19 Institutional 147 209 -62 Retail 4,120 4,027 93 Program Buy / Sell (Wbn) Buy Sell Net KOSPI 721 807 -87 KOSDAQ 370 383 -12 Advances & Declines Advances Declines Unchanged KOSPI 266 554 77 KOSDAQ 372 862 78 KOSPI Top 5 Most Active Stocks by Value (Wbn) Price (W) Chg (W) Value Feelux 7,050 460 394 Samsung Electronics 50,300 400 220 KODEX Kosdaq150 8,070 300 198 Leverage Hynix 77,500 100 163 KODEX KOSDAQ150 8,125 -170 156 INVERSE KOSDAQ Top 5 Most Active Stocks by Value (Wbn) Price (W) Chg (W) Value HLB 167,800 38,700 752 SillaJen 14,300 1,550 276 Energy Solutions 28,850 6,650 273 Kukil Paper 5,790 -20 232 ViroMed 85,800 1,500 124 Note: As of October 21, 2019 This document is a summary of a report prepared by Mirae Asset Daewoo Co., Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • The February Lunch at Ledo's Pizza Was Well Received with 20
    The February lunch at Ledo’s Pizza was well received with 20 members showing up. The Commander’s Column We had our first Second Wednesday Lunch get-together for 2017 at LEDO’s (Dual Hwy) on 2/8/17. Twenty of us attended including wives, and lady friends. We had a great time gabbing, eating and socializing. We will meet again at LEDO’s in March. Come on out to LEDO’s at 12:00 Noon on 3/8. All are welcome- members, wives, lady friends. The membership at the February Chapter meeting ap- proved two donations to worthy causes. This first was $3,200 for the Wall of Remembrance at the National KWVM in honor of the 32 heroes from Washington County. The donation has been sent to Korean War Veterans Memorial Foundation, Inc. The second was for $200 for the Military Band Concert Series. The do- nation has been sent to HCC Alumnae Foundation, Inc. The winter doldrums have been replaced by planning for spring and summer veterans memorial events com- ing in May, June and July on both the and local levels. Nationally, KWVA again has been invited to partici- pate in the Memorial Day Parade in Washington, DC, on Monday May 29th. Chapters are being asked to par- ticipate as we did last year. We will need to send a pre- liminary head count to National by April 1st which we will take at our March meeting- so be prepared. In June, the National Board of Directors will meet 6/22 to 6/26 in Washington.
    [Show full text]
  • Korea Morning Focus
    January 30, 2020 Korea Morning Focus Company News & Analysis Major Indices Close Chg Chg (%) Samsung Electro-Mechanics (009150/Buy/TP: W160,000) Raise TP KOSPI 2,185.28 8.56 0.39 A mixed outlook KOSPI 200 293.98 1.21 0.41 KOSDAQ 670.18 5.48 0.82 LG Innotek (011070/Buy/TP: W201,000) Raise TP Positives abound Turnover ('000 shares, Wbn) Volume Value POSCO Chemical (003670/Trading Buy/TP: W70,000) Downgrade rating, KOSPI 681,558 6,590 but raise TP KOSPI 200 84,850 4,457 KOSDAQ 1,040,290 5,574 Expectations of growth driving shares higher Market Cap (Wbn) LG H&H (051900/Buy/TP: W1,640,000) Value China growth on track KOSPI 1,472,172 KOSDAQ 242,426 KOSPI Turnover (Wbn) Buy Sell Net Foreign 1,649 1,548 101 Institutional 1,534 2,032 -498 Retail 3,355 2,982 373 KOSDAQ Turnover (Wbn) Buy Sell Net Foreign 561 599 -38 Institutional 197 206 -9 Retail 4,792 4,713 79 Program Buy / Sell (Wbn) Buy Sell Net KOSPI 1,445 1,467 -21 KOSDAQ 505 571 -66 Advances & Declines Advances Declines Unchanged KOSPI 516 305 88 KOSDAQ 779 450 115 KOSPI Top 5 Most Active Stocks by Value (Wbn) Price (W) Chg (W) Value Samsung Electronics 59,100 300 965 Hynix 97,900 1,600 269 KODEX Leverage 14,355 40 268 KODEX Kosdaq150 8,220 170 208 Leverage KODEX 200 Futures 6,095 -35 174 Inverse 2X KOSDAQ Top 5 Most Active Stocks by Value (Wbn) Price (W) Chg (W) Value Boditech 16,900 0 229 OKONG Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Proposal (Dehumidifier) Lotte Engineering & Machinery MFG / Overseas Business Team
    Business Proposal (Dehumidifier) Lotte Engineering & Machinery MFG / Overseas Business Team © Copyright 2011 LOTTE Engineering & Machinery MFG.Co., Ltd / Oversea sales & Marketing LOTTE Group Profile | Introduction Founded in 1948 , Japan / 1967, Korea Global conglomerate 5’th largest company in Korea Turnover USD 83Bilion in 2014 Number of Employees 60,000 Employees Core Business Retail, Manufacture, Leisure and Tourism #1 in Market Share Department store, Supermarket, Online shopping Mall, Home appliance Store Chemicals (Ethylene, Pet, Meg), Tourism (Hotel, Duty Free Shop, Theme Park) Stores 14,000 Stores in Korea and Overseas Ranking LOTTE is ranked 5’th among Korean Business Group Rank (Asset) 1990 2000 2010 Revenue CAGR (’01~’09)2 1 Hyundai Hyundai Samsung 6.8% 2 Daewoo¹ Samsung Hyundai Motor 12.7% 3 LG LG SK 9.0% 4 Samsung SK LG 10.7% 5 Hanjin Hanjin LOTTE 16.9% 6 SK LOTTE POSCO 12.7% 7 Ssang Yong1 Daewoo GS 17.5% 8 LOTTE Kumho Hyundai Heavy Ind. 21.2% 9 Kia Hanwha Hanjin -2.3% 10 Hanwha Ssang Yong KT 1.1% [ Source: Fair Trade Commission ] © Copyright Oversea Biz Team / LOTTE E&M 2015 © Copyright 2011 LOTTE Engineering & Machinery MFG.Co., Ltd / Oversea sales & Marketing LOTTE Group Profile | Introduction Business Structure Food & Beverage Retail Tourism / Service LOTTE Hotel LOTTE Shopping LOTTE Duty Free LOTTE Department store LOTTE World LOTTE Mart LOTTE JTB LOTTE Confectionery LOTTE Super LOTTE Asset Development LOTTE Chilsung Bev LOTTE Cinema LOTTE Corporation LOTTE Foods LOHB’s (H&B Division) LOTTE International LOTTE ria LOTTE
    [Show full text]
  • Emerging Markets Equity Fund
    Proxy Voting Record for the period ended June 30, 2020 Emerging Markets Equity Fund Proxy Voting Record © SEI 2020 seic.com/en-ca 811‐SEI04.txt ******************************* FORM N‐Px REPORT ******************************* ICA File Number: 811‐SEI04 Reporting Period: 07/01/2019 ‐ 06/30/2020 EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY FUND ***************************** SEI EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY FUND ********************************** ________________________________________________________________________________ 3SBIO Inc Ticker Security ID: Meeting Date Meeting Status 1530 CINS G8875G102 06/19/2020 Voted Meeting Type Country of Trade Annual Cayman Islands Issue No. Description Proponent Mgmt Rec Vote Cast For/Against Mgmt 1 Non‐Voting Meeting Note N/A N/A N/A N/A 2 Non‐Voting Meeting Note N/A N/A N/A N/A 3 Accounts and Reports Mgmt For For For 4 Elect SU Dongmei Mgmt For For For 5 Elect HUANG Bin Mgmt For Against Against 6 Elect TANG Ke Mgmt For For For 7 Elect WONG Lap Yan Mgmt For For For 8 Directors' Fees Mgmt For For For 9 Appointment of Auditor Mgmt For For For and Authority to Set Fees 10 Authority to Issue Mgmt For Against Against Shares w/o Preemptive Rights 11 Authority to Mgmt For For For Repurchase Shares 12 Authority to Issue Mgmt For Against Against Repurchased Shares ________________________________________________________________________________ A‐Living Services Co. Ltd Ticker Security ID: Meeting Date Meeting Status 3319 CINS Y0038M100 01/07/2020 Voted Meeting Type Country of Trade Special China Page 1 811‐SEI04.txt Issue No. Description Proponent Mgmt Rec Vote Cast For/Against Mgmt 1 Non‐Voting Meeting Note N/A N/A N/A N/A 2 Amendments to Articles Mgmt For Against Against ________________________________________________________________________________ A‐Living Services Co.
    [Show full text]
  • THE STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT of KOREAN and JAPANESE BIG BUSINESS GROUPS: a Comparison Study Between Korean General Trading Companies and Japanese Sogo Shoshas
    THE STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT OF KOREAN AND JAPANESE BIG BUSINESS GROUPS: A Comparison Study between Korean General Trading Companies and Japanese Sogo Shoshas by IN WOO JUN A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Management The Birmingham Business School The University of Birmingham August, 2009 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT This research is an in-depth study of Korean GTCs (General Trading Companies) and Japanese Sogo Shoshas (the Japanese version of General Trading Companies), which are unique big business conglomerates but not well-known in Western countries. It investigates and compares several of their features, such as their history, characteristics, functions, organisational structure, corporate culture, human resource management, their impact on national economic development, strategic management and decision-making process. First, it examines a wide range of literature to show the functions of Korean GTCs and Japanese Sogo Shoshas as transaction intermediaries, information gatherers, project organisers, international marketers, financial providers, etc. With these varied functions, they have played significant roles not only from the macro aspect, but also the micro aspect.
    [Show full text]
  • Asia Pacific Duty-Free Retailing Markets, 2020-2025: Market Is Expected to Recover in 2021 and Exhibit Moderate Growth During 2021-2025
    Source : Research and Markets 23 sept. 2020 05h58 HE Asia Pacific Duty-Free Retailing Markets, 2020-2025: Market is Expected to Recover in 2021 and Exhibit Moderate Growth During 2021-2025 Dublin, Sept. 23, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The "Asia Pacific Duty-Free Retailing Market: Global Industry Trends, Share, Size, Growth, Opportunity and Forecast 2020-2025" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering. The Asia Pacific duty-free retailing market grew at a CAGR of around 9% during 2014-2019. Key Questions Answered in This Report: How has the Asia Pacific duty-free retailing market performed so far and how will it perform in the coming years? What has been the impact of COVID-19 on the Asia Pacific duty-free retailing market? What are the key regional markets? What is the breakup of the market based on the product type? What is the breakup of the market based on the distribution channel? What are the various stages in the value chain of the industry? What are the key driving factors and challenges in the industry? What is the structure of the Asia Pacific duty-free retailing market and who are the key players? What is the degree of competition in the industry? The outbreak of the COVID pandemic, in early 2020, however, has negatively impacted the market for duty-free retailing in the Asia Pacific region. The pandemic resulted in national lockdowns across the region resulting in restrictions in international travel, creating a negative impact on the industry. The Asia Pacific duty-free retailing market, however, is expected to recover from 2021 and exhibit moderate growth during 2021-2025.
    [Show full text]