DOCSLIB.ORG

Western Europe Source: Globocan 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Western Europe Source: Globocan 2020 Western Europe Source: Globocan 2020 Number of new cases in 2020, both sexes, all ages Geography Prostate 170 032 (11.9%) Breast 169 016 (11.9%) Other cancers Lung 729 099 (51.2%) 146 460 (10.3%) Colorectum 141 644 (9.9%) Bladder 68 143 (4.8%) Total: 1 424 394 Number of new cases in 2020, males, all ages Numbers at a glance Total population Prostate 170 032 (21.8%) 196146321 Other cancers 357 428 (45.8%) Number of new cases Lung 89 646 (11.5%) Colorectum 77 052 (9.9%) 1424394 Number of deaths Melanoma of skin Bladder 34 745 (4.5%) 51 854 (6.6%) Total: 780 757 559671 Number of new cases in 2020, females, all ages Number of prevalent cases (5-year) Breast 169 016 (26.3%) 4825206 Other cancers Data source and methods 293 891 (45.7%) Colorectum 64 592 (10%) Incidence Lung Population weighted average of the rates of the region- 56 814 (8.8%) specific countries included in GLOBOCAN 2020. Mortality Corpus uteri Melanoma of skin 28 901 (4.5%) 30 423 (4.7%) Population weighted average of the rates of the region- specific countries included in GLOBOCAN 2020. Total: 643 637 Prevalence Summary statistic 2020 Sum of region-specific prevalent cases. Males Females Both sexes Populations included Population 96 374 578 99 771 743 196 146 321 Number of new cancer cases 780 757 643 637 1 424 394 Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Liechtenstein*, Age-standardized incidence rate (World) 365.3 294.3 325.0 Luxembourg, Monaco*, Switzerland, The Netherlands Risk of developing cancer before the age of 75 years (%) 34.9 27.9 31.2 Number of cancer deaths 310 542 249 129 559 671 Age-standardized mortality rate (World) 127.1 83.9 103.3 Risk of dying from cancer before the age of 75 years (%) 13.0 8.8 10.8 5-year prevalent cases 2 566 404 2 258 802 4 825 206 Top 5 most frequent cancers excluding non-melanoma skin cancer Prostate Breast Prostate (ranked by cases) Lung Colorectum Breast Colorectum Lung Lung Bladder Melanoma Colorectum Melanoma Corpus uteri Bladder * Country not available in GLOBOCAN 2020 but included in the region The Global Cancer Observatory - All Rights Reserved - March, 2021. Page 1 Western Europe Source: Globocan Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence by cancer site New cases Deaths 5-year prevalence (all ages) Cancer Number Rank (%) Cum.risk Number Rank (%) Cum.risk Number Prop. (per 100 000) Prostate 170 032 1 11.9 9.98 31 968 5 5.7 0.76 696 790 723.00 Breast 169 016 2 11.9 9.69 43 706 2 7.8 1.65 711 748 713.38 Lung 146 460 3 10.3 4.07 113 524 1 20.3 2.91 187 685 95.69 Colon 89 741 4 6.3 1.95 42 637 4 7.6 0.69 269 013 137.15 Bladder 68 143 5 4.8 1.53 20 866 7 3.7 0.29 228 288 116.39 Melanoma of skin 65 168 6 4.6 1.99 7 415 17 1.3 0.16 230 212 117.37 Rectum 46 243 7 3.2 1.18 18 235 9 3.3 0.34 150 953 76.96 Pancreas 45 461 8 3.2 0.99 43 336 3 7.7 0.89 33 127 16.89 Non-Hodgkin lymphoma 43 131 9 3.0 1.12 17 423 11 3.1 0.29 138 621 70.67 Kidney 39 869 10 2.8 1.11 16 120 12 2.9 0.30 121 884 62.14 Leukaemia 32 865 11 2.3 0.82 20 683 8 3.7 0.34 97 711 49.82 Corpus uteri 28 901 12 2.0 1.61 6 552 18 1.2 0.23 115 051 115.31 Stomach 28 490 13 2.0 0.66 17 755 10 3.2 0.35 46 865 23.89 Liver 26 128 14 1.8 0.67 23 657 6 4.2 0.54 25 708 13.11 Thyroid 25 089 15 1.8 0.91 1 854 26 0.33 0.03 97 836 49.88 Brain, central nervous system 18 577 16 1.3 0.58 14 557 14 2.6 0.43 56 632 28.87 Oesophagus 18 283 17 1.3 0.52 14 842 13 2.7 0.37 22 854 11.65 Multiple myeloma 18 114 18 1.3 0.43 11 063 16 2.0 0.19 49 957 25.47 Lip, oral cavity 17 770 19 1.2 0.55 5 133 19 0.92 0.14 56 793 28.95 Ovary 15 927 20 1.1 0.81 11 943 15 2.1 0.50 45 757 45.86 Cervix uteri 10 102 21 0.71 0.67 4 296 20 0.77 0.22 31 886 31.96 Oropharynx 10 005 22 0.70 0.35 4 030 21 0.72 0.12 30 983 15.80 Testis 9 307 23 0.65 0.74 349 34 0.06 0.02 43 465 45.10 Larynx 8 632 24 0.61 0.27 3 342 23 0.60 0.09 30 002 15.30 Vulva 6 219 25 0.44 0.26 1 854 25 0.33 0.05 20 610 20.66 Hypopharynx 5 912 26 0.42 0.20 2 402 24 0.43 0.07 11 754 5.99 Anus 5 660 27 0.40 0.17 1 394 28 0.25 0.03 18 569 9.47 Hodgkin lymphoma 5 590 28 0.39 0.20 745 30 0.13 0.02 22 495 11.47 Mesothelioma 4 628 29 0.32 0.09 3 970 22 0.71 0.07 5 237 2.67 Salivary glands 2 750 30 0.19 0.07 1 003 29 0.18 0.02 9 475 4.83 Gallbladder 2 655 31 0.19 0.05 1 731 27 0.31 0.03 2 987 1.52 Penis 2 098 32 0.15 0.11 510 31 0.09 0.02 7 353 7.63 Nasopharynx 1 304 33 0.09 0.04 502 32 0.09 0.01 4 542 2.32 Vagina 939 34 0.07 0.04 350 33 0.06 0.01 2 765 2.77 Kaposi sarcoma 605 35 0.04 0.02 43 35 0.01 0.00 2 041 1.04 All cancer sites 1 424 394 - - 31.24 559 671 - - 10.85 4 825 206 2460.0 Age-standardized (World) incidence rates per sex, top 10 cancers Males Females Breast 90.7 Prostate 77.6 Lung 41.7 25.0 Colorectum 34.3 23.9 Melanoma of skin 19.4 18.9 Bladder 21.5 5.8 Non-Hodgkin lymphoma 12.7 7.8 Kidney 12.9 6.3 Thyroid 4.2 13.8 Leukaemia 10.3 6.9 100 80 60 40 20 0 20 40 60 80 100 ASR (World) per 100 000 Age-standardized (World) incidence and mortality rates, top 10 cancers Incidence Mortality Breast 90.7 15.6 Prostate 77.6 9.8 Lung 32.7 23.8 Colorectum 28.7 10.2 Melanoma of skin 18.9 1.5 Bladder 13.0 3.0 Corpus uteri 12.9 2.0 Non-Hodgkin lymphoma 10.2 2.8 Kidney 9.5 2.8 Testis 9.3 0.27 100 80 60 40 20 0 20 40 60 80 100 ASR (World) per 100 000 The Global Cancer Observatory - All Rights Reserved - March, 2021. Page 2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BREAKDOWN of SUB-REGIONS Americas
    BREAKDOWN OF SUB-REGIONS Americas Atlantic Islands and Central and Canada Eastern US Latin America Southwest US Argentina Atlantic Canada Kansas City Boston Atlantic Islands British Columbia Nebraska Hartford Brazil A Canadian Prairies Oklahoma Maine Brazil B Montreal & Quebec Southwest US A New York A Central America Toronto Southwest US B New York B Chile St. Louis Philadelphia Colombia Pittsburgh Mexico Washington DC Peru Western New York Uruguay Midwest US Southeastern US Western US Chicago Florida Colorado Cleveland Greater Tennessee Desert US Indianapolis Louisville Hawaii Iowa Mid-South US Idaho Madison North Carolina Los Angeles Milwaukee Southern Classic New Mexico Minnesota Virginia Northern California Southern Ohio Orange County West Michigan Portland Salt Lake San Diego Seattle Spokane Asia Pacific Oceania Eastern Asia Southeastern Asia Southern Asia Brisbane Beijing Cambodia Bangladesh Melbourne Chengdu Indonesia India A New Zealand Hong Kong Malaysia India B Perth Japan Philippines India C Sydney Korea Singapore Nepal Mongolia Thailand Pakistan Shanghai Vietnam Sri Lanka Shenzhen A Shenzhen B Taiwan Europe, Middle East, and Africa Sub-Saharan Africa Eastern Europe Northern Europe Southern Europe Ethiopia Bulgaria Denmark & Norway Croatia Ghana Czech Republic Finland Cyprus Kenya Hungary Ireland Greece Mauritius Kazakhstan Sweden Israel Nigeria A Poland A Istanbul Nigeria B Poland B Italy Rwanda Romania Portugal South Africa Russia A Serbia Tanzania Russia B Slovenia Uganda Slovakia Spain Zimbabwe Ukraine A Ukraine B Middle East and Western Europe North Africa Austria Bahrain Benelux Doha France Egypt Germany Emirates Switzerland Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Morocco Oman Saudi Arabia .
    [Show full text]
  • The Post-Cold War Security Dilemma in the Transcaucasus
    The Post-Cold War Security Dilemma In the Transcaucasus Garnik Nanagoulian, Fellow Weatherhead Center For International Affairs Harvard University May 2000 This paper was prepared by the author during his stay as a Fellow at the Weatherhead Center for International Affairs of Harvard University. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author and do not reflect those of the Armenian Government or of the Weatherhead Center for International Affairs 1 Introduction With the demise of the Soviet Union, the newly emerging countries of the Transcaucasus and Caspian regions were the objects of growing interest from the major Western powers and the international business community, neither of which had had access to the region since the early nineteenth century. The world’s greatest power, the United States, has never had a presence in this region, but it is now rapidly emerging as a major player in what is becoming a new classical balance of power game. One of the main attractions of the region, which has generated unprecedented interest from the US, Western Europe, Turkey, Iran, China, Pakistan and others, is the potential of oil and gas reserves. While it was private Western interests that first brought the region into the sphere of interest of policy makers in Western capitals, commercial considerations have gradually been subordinated to political and geopolitical objectives. One of these objectives—not formally declared, but at least perceived as such in Moscow—amounts to containment of Russia: by helping these states protect their newly acquired independence (as it is perceived in Washington), the US can keep Russia from reasserting any "imperial" plans in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Western and Central Europe
    WESTERN AND CENTRAL EUROPE Dividers_country profiles.indd 1 15/11/2016 15:07:26 Dividers_country profiles.indd 9 28/10/2014 11:08:38 WESTERN AND SOUTHERN EUROPE − Andorra − In 2015, Andorra amended the criminal code by introducing three new articles (121bis, 134bis and 157bis) covering, respectively, trafficking for the purpose of organ removal, trafficking for the purpose of forced labour, slavery and servitude, and trafficking for the purpose of sexual exploitation. These offences refer to national and foreign victims. The previous legislation only covered trafficking of irregular migrants for the exploitation of their work. Investigations and suspects The national authorities reported that no cases of trafficking in persons in any form have been registered in Andorra during the period between 2012 and 2015. Source: Permanent Mission of Andorra to OSCE and other International Organizations in Vienna. − Austria − The current legislation on trafficking in persons in Austria covers all forms of trafficking indicated in the UN Trafficking in Persons Protocol. The Austrian authorities use two articles of the criminal code to prosecute trafficking cases: Trafficking in Human Beings (Section 104a) and Cross-border trafficking in prostitution (Section 217). Investigations and suspects Number of cases of trafficking in persons recorded, according to the article of the criminal code used, 2012-2014 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2012 2013 2014 Recorded offences for Trafficking in Human 22 24 35 Beings (section 104a) Recorded offences for Cross-border trafficking in 48 49 29 prostitution (section 217) Source: Police Crime Statistics. Persons suspected of trafficking in human beings (section 104a), by gender, 2012-2014 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2012 2013 2014 Males suspected of trafficking in human beings 21 17 46 (section 104a) Females suspected of trafficking in human beings 10 8 15 (section 104a) Source: Police Crime Statistics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Happiness Gap in Eastern Europe
    The happiness gap in eastern Europe Simeon Djankov, Elena Nikolova and Jan Zilinsky Summary Citizens in eastern Europe are less satisfied with life than their peers in other countries. This happiness gap has persisted over time, despite predictions to the contrary by earlier scholars. It holds after controlling for a variety of covariates, such as the standard of living, life expectancy and Eastern Orthodox religion. Armed with a battery of surveys from the early 1990s to 2014, we argue that the happiness gap is explained by how citizens in post-communist countries perceive their governments. Eastern Europeans link their life satisfaction to higher perceived corruption and weaker government performance. Our results suggest that the transition from central planning is still incomplete, at least in the psychology of people. Keywords: happiness, corruption, eastern Europe JEL Classification: D73, I30, P35 Contact details: Elena Nikolova, One Exchange Square, London EC2A 2JN, United Kingdom Phone: +44 20 7338 7931; Fax: +44 20 7338 6110; email: [email protected]. Simeon Djankov is at the Department of Finance, London School of Economics and Political Science and Visiting Fellow at the Peter G. Peterson Institute for International Economics. Elena Nikolova is a Research Economist at the EBRD. Jan Zilinsky is Research Analyst at the Peter G. Peterson Institute for International Economics. This paper is written as part of a symposium: Ukraine: Escape from Post-Soviet Legacy? The authors would like to thank an anonymous referee, Abhijit Banerjee, Erik Berglof,¨ Andrew Clark, Yuriy Gorodnichenko, Gerard´ Roland and Peter Sanfey for helpful comments. The working paper series has been produced to stimulate debate on economic transition and development.
    [Show full text]
  • The EU and the Western Balkans: So Near and Yet So Far WP S Why the Region Needs Fast-Track Socio-Economic Convergence with the EU Matteo Bonomi and Dušan Reljić
    Introduction Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs Comments The EU and the Western Balkans: So Near and Yet So Far WP S Why the Region Needs Fast-Track Socio-Economic Convergence with the EU Matteo Bonomi and Dušan Reljić The European Commission will unveil its new EU Enlargement Strategy on February 6th, 2018. Since relations with Turkey have deteriorated markedly, only the Western Balkan states remain candidates for EU membership. The EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Federica Mogherini, has stated the European Commission’s intention to ensure that the Western Balkan countries are on an “irreversible” track to membership in the Union before the end of its mandate in 2019. Unless the new En- largement Strategy offers a realistic plan to tackle the lack of economic growth and social progress in the region, it will be another futile institutional exercise because democracy, the rule of law and other basic distinctions of “Europeanness” cannot make lasting inroads into the enduring poverty in the Western Balkans. In the past two decades, the Western Bal- economies, foster democratic institutions kan countries have largely enacted the and pave the way for EU membership. fundamental economic reforms requested Things have turned out differently from by the European Union (EU), the World the transition blueprint that was envisaged Bank and the International Monetary Fund for the Western Balkans, however. The (IMF) under the so-called “Washington expectations that these countries would consensus”, following the matrix previously gradually converge towards EU economic created for Central-Eastern Europe (CEE).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 10 Medieval Law in Transcaucasia
    Chapter 10 Medieval Law in Transcaucasia— on the Periphery of European Legal History 1. Introduction The re-emergence of Armenia and Georgia as legally independent and sovereign states has re-awakened an interest in their legal systems and their history. For centuries, these countries were hidden from the view of Western Europe, located as they were behind the vast Russian and Ottoman empires, themselves states which played mostly a marginal role as European powers. Through the ages, the fate of Armenia and Georgia has largely been determined by the histories of their more powerful neighbours, the suc- cessive empires of Assyrians, Persians, Alexander the Great, Romans, Parthians, Arabs, Seldjuks, Mongols, Ottomans and Russians. When circumstances were favourable, Armenia and Georgia were occasionally able to consolidate their political position in the form of an independent or semi-independent state. These states have left a considerable heritage of legislation and other legal sources. The purpose of this chapter is to offer a general overview of the most important material available and to indicate, however briefly and provisionally, the place of medieval Armenian and Georgian law in the context of European legal history. Inevitably, this will have to be largely an exercise in external legal history; a more substan- tive treatment of the contents of the available material would exceed the limits of this chapter. The legal history of Azerbaidzhan, at present the third independent state in Transcaucasia, will not be discussed. Azerbaidzhan was conquered by the Arabs in 642, when it became part of the world of Islam. During the 9th century, the original Iranian population was turkicized.
    [Show full text]
  • What Do You Know? People, Places, and Cultures
    NAME ________________________________________ DATE _____________ CLASS ______ Western Europe Lesson 3: Life in Western Europe ESSENTIAL QUESTION How do governments change? Terms to Know postindustrial describing an economy that is based on providing services rather than manufacturing What Do You Know? In the first column, answer the questions based on what you know before you study. After this lesson, complete the last column. Now… Later… How were the Western European nations able to recover following two world wars? How did Western European culture spread around the world? How has the economy of Western Europe evolved since World War II? People, Places, and Cultures Guiding Question What are contributions of Western Europe to Accessing Prior culture, education, and the arts? Knowledge Political events in the 1900s threatened all of Europe. In order to 1. What political events survive and compete in a changing world, the nations of Western in the 1900s made Europe needed to learn to work together. After World War II, they European countries made efforts to do this. believe they needed In April 1951, the Treaty of Paris created an international agency to work together? to supervise the coal and steel industries. France, West Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, and Italy signed this treaty. These six nations created the European Economic Community (the EEC) in 1958 to make trade among the member nations easier. Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. Permission is granted to reproduce for classroom use. classroom for reproduce to is granted Permission Education. © McGraw-Hill Copyright Reading Essentials and Study Guide 153 NAME ________________________________________ DATE _____________ CLASS ______ Western Europe Lesson 3: Life in Western Europe, continued In 1967 these countries came together to form the European Sequencing Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Appendix 1. United Nations Geoscheme the United Nations
    Appendix 1. United Nations Geoscheme The United Nations Geoscheme divides the world into regions and sub-regions. This assignment is for statistical convenience and does not imply any assumption regarding political or other affiliation of countries or territories. Table 1. United Nations Geoscheme (data from https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49/) Region Sub-region Countries and Territories Africa Northern Africa Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Morocco, Sudan, Tunisia, Western Sahara Eastern Africa British Indian Ocean Territory, Burundi, Comoros, Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, French Southern Territories, Kenya, Madagascar, Malawi, Mauritius, Mayotte, Mozambique, Réunion, Rwanda, Seychelles, Somalia, South Sudan, Uganda, United Republic of Tanzania, Zambia, Zimbabwe Middle Africa Angola, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Congo, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Sao Tome and Principe Southern Africa Botswana, Eswatini, Lesotho, Namibia, South Africa Western Africa Benin, Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde, Côte d’Ivoire, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia, Mali, Mauritania, Niger, Nigeria, Saint Helena, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Togo Americas Latin America and the Caribbean: Anguilla, Antigua and Barbuda, Aruba, Bahamas, Barbados, Bonaire, Sint Caribbean Eustatius and Saba, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Cuba, Curaçao, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Grenada, Guadeloupe, Haiti, Jamaica, Martinique, Montserrat, Puerto Rico, Saint Barthélemy, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Martin (French Part),
    [Show full text]
  • Tax Competitiveness of the New EU Member States
    Journal of Risk and Financial Management Article Tax Competitiveness of the New EU Member States Askoldas Podviezko 1,* , Lyudmila Parfenova 2 and Andrey Pugachev 2 1 Agricultural Policy and Foreign Trade Division, Lithuanian Institute of Agrarian Economics, LT-03105 Vilnius, Lithuania 2 Economic Faculty, P. G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University, RU-150003 Yaroslavl, Russia; [email protected] (L.P.); [email protected] (A.P.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +370-5-2614525 Received: 7 December 2018; Accepted: 21 January 2019; Published: 14 February 2019 Abstract: This paper investigates tax competitiveness among the EU member countries. The tax competition of countries causes both positive and negative effects on macroeconomic processes such as the effectiveness of government spending, the rationality of supply of externalities, and the length and amplitudes of business cycles. A considerable reduction of corporate tax in the EU is related to increased tax competition after new members entered the EU. Multiple criteria methods were chosen for the quantitative evaluation of EU countries from different regions of the EU. Criteria of evaluation were chosen and structured into a hierarchy. The convergence process of the new members of the EU is reinforced with the increasing tax competitiveness of such countries. Results of the multiple criteria evaluation revealed both the factors that increased the tax competitiveness of new members of the EU, and outlined the factors that hampered such competition. Keywords: state tax risks; loss of competitiveness of tax system; tax competition; tax revenues; tax burden; multiple criteria evaluation; PROMETHEE 1. Introduction The process of globalization increasingly penetrates economic relations through all levels of the world’s economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Decomposition of Regional Convergence in Population Aging Across Europe Ilya Kashnitsky1,2* , Joop De Beer1 and Leo Van Wissen1
    Kashnitsky et al. Genus (2017) 73:2 DOI 10.1186/s41118-017-0018-2 Genus ORIGINAL ARTICLE Open Access Decomposition of regional convergence in population aging across Europe Ilya Kashnitsky1,2* , Joop de Beer1 and Leo van Wissen1 * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract 1Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute, University of In the face of rapidly aging population, decreasing regional inequalities in population Groningen, Groningen, The composition is one of the regional cohesion goals of the European Union. To our Netherlands knowledge, no explicit quantification of the changes in regional population aging 2National Research University Higher School of Economics, differentiation exist. We investigate how regional differences in population aging Moscow, Russia developed over the last decade and how they are likely to evolve in the coming three decades, and we examine how demographic components of population growth contribute to the process. We use the beta-convergence approach to test whether regions are moving towards a common level of population aging. The change in population composition is decomposed into the separate effects of changes in the size of the non-working-age population and of the working-age population. The latter changes are further decomposed into the effects of cohort turnover, migration at working ages, and mortality at working ages. European Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics (NUTS)-2 regions experienced notable convergence in population aging during the period 2003–2012 and are expected to experience further convergence in the coming three decades. Convergence in aging mainly depends on changes in the population structure of East-European regions. Cohort turnover plays the major role in promoting convergence.
    [Show full text]
  • Document 9: Sub-Regional Consultations : Western Europe
    DOCUMENT 9 SECOND CYCLE OF PERIODIC REPORTING IN EUROPE Sub-Regional Consultation Sessions Western Europe 2 December 2014 – Fortress of Suomenlinna, Helsinki This document provides background information for the Sub-Regional Consultation Sessions, for which the following objectives have been set: Session 1: - Review the First Cycle PR Sub-Regional Recommended Actions. - Discuss the Second Cycle PR Priority Actions for the sub-region. Session 2: - Presentation of the Outcomes of the Desk Studies for Capacity-Building per sub-region (by the authors of the studies). - Discuss priority capacity-building activities for the sub-region in the overall framework of the World Heritage Capacity-Building Strategy (2011). Please note that the conclusions of sub-regional Background Desk Studies for Capacity Building were devised by consultants, and do not necessarily reflect the views of UNESCO or the World Heritage Centre. FIRST CYCLE: RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE BASIS OF THE 4 C (2006) Responsibility s t odie Objectives Comments B COM dvisory States Parties WH WHC A Site Manag Strategic Objective: Strengthen the Credibility of the World Heritage List Strengthen the understanding of World Heritage conservation in the European Region by clarifying concepts, in particular those of ‘outstanding universal value’, World Heritage criteria, and X X X X authenticity and integrity, through training and capacity building in particular for States Parties and site managers Promote discussions through meetings and workshops on the implementation of the World X X X Heritage Convention and on its concepts at all levels in the sub-region. Sub-Regional Consultation Sessions: Western Europe Responsibility s t odie Objectives Comments B COM dvisory States Parties WH WHC A Site Manag Encourage the development of transnational sites X X X as a tool of international cooperation Encourage all State Parties to consider linking inscribed World Heritage Properties of similar type (ex.
    [Show full text]
  • GBD 2015 Region and Country List 06 01 15.Xlsx
    GBD 2015 Geographies Super regions Regions Country names Central Europe, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia Central Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Georgia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Mongolia Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan Central Europe Albania Bosnia and Herzegovina Bosnia and Herzegovina Croatia Czech Republic Hungary Macedonia Montenegro Poland Romania Serbia Slovakia Slovenia Eastern Europe Belarus Estonia Latvia Lithuania Moldova Russia Ukraine High‐income Australasia Australia New Zealand High‐income Asia Pacific Brunei Japan Singapore South Korea High‐income North America Canada United States Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas Super regions Regions Country names California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Southern Latin America Argentina Chile Uruguay Western Europe Super regions Regions Country names Andorra Austria Belgium Cyprus Denmark Finland France Germany Greece Greenland Iceland Ireland Israel Italy Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Norway Portugal Spain Sweden Switzerland United Kingdom England Northern Ireland Scotland Wales Latin America and Caribbean Andean Latin America Bolivia Ecuador Peru Caribbean Antigua and Barbuda The
    [Show full text]