DOCSLIB.ORG

Franklin Local Board Fact Sheet (Pukekohe, Buckland, Paerata, Ramarama, Bombay, Hunua, Ararimu)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Franklin Local Board Fact Sheet (Pukekohe, Buckland, Paerata, Ramarama, Bombay, Hunua, Ararimu) Franklin Local Board Fact Sheet (Pukekohe, Buckland, Paerata, Ramarama, Bombay, Hunua, Ararimu) What are the areas of most change? Pukekohe is identified as a Satellite Town in the Unitary Plan. The biggest changes residents will see are greater heights and densities provided for: in the town centre of Pukekohe in the main urban areas of Pukekohe for the Manukau Road area. Another significant change is a change to the subdivision provisions for the rural zones. RESIDENTIAL CHANGES What are the restrictions for the Single House zone? The Single House Zone has been used to buffer higher densities in urban Pukekohe and has been applied to Buckland and Bombay. The Proposed Single House Zone allows one unit per site with at least 500m2 vacant land required for subdivision. The Residential Zone of the Franklin District Plan provided for residential densities of 1 dwelling per 350m2. A Unitary Plan development overlay has been applied to Buckland and Bombay which restricts subdivision to a minimum of 800m2. Under the Franklin District Plan these areas had a minimum lot size of 800m2. The proposed 8m (two storeys) height limit for the Single House Zone is generally consistent with the height limit in the Franklin District Plan. What’s happening with Mixed Housing? Mixed Housing zoning is proposed for most of the urban residential part of Pukekohe. Franklin Local Board Fact Sheet (Pukekohe, Buckland, Paerata, Ramarama, Bombay, Hunua, Ararimu) In the Mixed Housing Zone, one to four dwellings at a density of one unit per 300m2 do not require resource consent. If a site is larger than 1200m2 no density limit is specified and resource consent is required for five or more dwellings. The operative Residential Zone provides for household units at minimum of one per 350m2. The permitted 8m height limit for the Mixed Housing Zone is consistent with the height limit in the current District Plan. What’s happening with the Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings Zone? There is no Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings Zone applied to this area. What are the restrictions for a Large Lot Residential Zone? Some land currently zoned Rural Residential along the southern and eastern edges of Pukekohe has been rezoned as Large Lot Residential. Both existing and proposed zones restrict development to one dwelling per site. The permitted 8m height limit for Large Lot Residential is the same as that permitted for the Pukekohe North Hill Structure Plan Area. What’s happening with Rural and Coastal Settlement Zones? The Rural and Coastal Settlement Zone has been applied to the existing residential part of Paerata, Hunua Village and Ararimu Village. The Rural and Coastal Settlement Zone allows for a density of 1 dwelling per 4,000m2 (and 4,000m2 as a minimum lot size). The operative Village Zone provides for a minimum lot size of 800m2 in reticulated areas and 2,500m2 where sites are not reticulated. The proposed height limit in the Rural and Coastal Settlement Zone is 8m which is consistent with the District Plan. BUSINESS CHANGES What’s happening in the Town Centres? A Town Centre Zone is identified for Pukekohe and extends part-way along Manukau Road. A 16.5m (four storeys) height is proposed. This area is currently zoned business with a 12m maximum height. This area is not shown as a Unitary Plan precinct. Franklin Local Board Fact Sheet (Pukekohe, Buckland, Paerata, Ramarama, Bombay, Hunua, Ararimu) The Unitary Plan shows a Light Industry zoning for the following areas: • The majority of Manukau Road • Existing business zoned land around Adams Drive • Existing business zoned land at Paerata • Existing business zoned land at Buckland A small portion of land adjacent to Franklin Road has been zoned as Mixed Use. A General Business zone has also been applied to some areas along Manukau Road, Harris Road and to a portion of Bombay. The proposed maximum permitted heights are 16.5m (four storeys) in the Mixed Use, and General Business Zones. For the Light Industry Zone, heights are reduced to 10m within 50m of residential or open space zones or otherwise 20 metres. Local shops are shown as Neighbourhood Centres in the Unitary Plan with a maximum permitted height of 12.5m (three storeys). What about existing plans such as the Pukekohe North Hill and North East Structure Plans? Provisions of recent Franklin District plan changes for these areas have helped set Unitary Plan provisions for these areas. The Residential zoned areas of the Pukekohe North Hill, Pukekohe North East, and most of the East Fields Structure Plan areas have been rezoned to Mixed Housing. The remainder of the East Fields Structure Plan area and the Pukekohe North Structure Plan area have been rezoned to Single House. The undeveloped portions of the Pukekohe North Hill Structure Plan Area and the former rural residential and rural zone areas are subject to a Design and Development Overlay – which contains specific provisions for development (similar to the District Plan provisions). RURAL CHANGES Most of the land which is currently zoned under the District Plan as Rural, has been zoned as Rural Production. In the Rural Production Zone, resource consent is required for more than one dwelling on a site. This zone restricts general rural subdivision and the minimum subdivision size is 150ha. However, incentives are provided for subdivision which enhances the environment. Franklin Local Board Fact Sheet (Pukekohe, Buckland, Paerata, Ramarama, Bombay, Hunua, Ararimu) Land to the north east of Pukekohe is identified as Countryside Living. New lots in the Unitary Plan Countryside Living Zone require a minimum size of 2ha. The Unitary Plan makes provision for some Transferable Development Right subdivision in Countryside Living Zones (where titles are transferred from the Rural Production and Mixed Rural zones). With a transferable development right the lot size in the Runciman Countryside Living Zone can be reduced to a minimum of 8,000m2. The Runciman area is the subject of outstanding Environment Court appeals relating to the partly operative Rural Plan Change 14. Are there provisions for protecting our natural environment, special character and important features? The Unitary Plan has recognised the special character and important features of this area, and has included provisions for protecting and managing these. For example there are Significant Ecological Area overlays and notable trees identified in Franklin. Coastal Protection Yard overlays apply to coastal properties. Mangroves can be removed without consent from some areas that were free of them in 1996. A heritage pre-1944 demolition control map notation is shown in three areas: In vicinity of West Street/Victoria Street/Harris Road In the vicinity of Dublin Street/Edinburgh Street/Hall Street/Albert Street Prospect Terrace Totara Avenue John Street (Glasgow to Nelson Street) This is an interim control while heritage surveys are undertaken – any proposed demolition would need resource consent. Rural Urban Boundary in Franklin: The Unitary Plan identifies that the primary focus for urban growth, outside of existing urban areas, is greenfield land within the Rural Urban Boundary (RUB) that is contiguous with the urban area and the satellite towns of Pukekohe and Warkworth. Franklin Local Board Fact Sheet (Pukekohe, Buckland, Paerata, Ramarama, Bombay, Hunua, Ararimu) The RUB will define the maximum extent of urban development in greenfield land to help meet the growth projected in the Auckland Plan. The wider context for the RUB investigations is contained in the Addendum to the draft Auckland Unitary Plan. Future growth options in the Karaka, Drury, Hingaia, Paerata and Pukekohe areas are being investigated. Feedback on these options is sought, especially about: What is your preferred scenario and why? Do you have any concerns about any particular locations? Do you have any comments on the three scenarios? Feedback These proposals are a draft, and we are really keen to hear what you think about them. We encourage you to have your say by going to www.shapeauckland.co.nz, and giving us your feedback before 31 May, 2013. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Historic Heritage Topic Report
    Historic Heritage Topic Report Drury Structure Plan August 2017 Image: Detail from Cadastral Survey of Drury 1931 (LINZ) 1 This report has been prepared by John Brown (MA) and Adina Brown (MA, MSc), Plan.Heritage Ltd. Content was also supplied by Cara Francesco, Auckland Council and Lisa Truttman, Historian. This report has been prepared for input into the Drury Structure Plan process and should not be relied upon for any other purpose. This report relies upon information from multiple sources but cannot guarantee the accuracy of that information. 1 Table of contents Contents 1. Executive summary ..................................................................................................... 4 2. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 6 2.1. Purpose ...................................................................................................................... 6 2.2. Study area .................................................................................................................. 6 3. Methodology ............................................................................................................... 8 3.1. Approach .................................................................................................................... 8 3.2. Scope .......................................................................................................................... 8 3.3. Community and iwi consultation.................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Meet Your Franklin Local Board Candidates P4-5
    6 September 2019 Issue 1317 Stephanie McLean –Harcourts Pohutukawa Coast Stephanie Mclean Licensed Agent REAA 2008. Election Sales &Marketing Specialist M 021 164 5111 Hoverd&Co. SPeCIAL special AGENTs IAN 0272859314 JENNY02040002564 Meet your NICOLETTE0277029157 Franklin Local Board candidates TING 40 p4-5 RA Y B T E E OR ON A R L MTIMBER E CO.LTD S C 292 8656 • • 19 9 79 – 201 Morton Timber Co. Ltd 226 NorthRoad, Clevedon2248 Ph 292 8656 or 021943 220 Email: [email protected] Web: www.mortontimber.co.nz Like us on Facebook to go in the draw to WIN a$150 voucher fordinneratyour INSIDE: AT proposes road repairs p2 Urban East feature p6-7 Sports news p10-11 favouritelocal restaurant GetaJumponthe Spring Market... Call EliseObern Great Smiles. P:(09) 536 7011 or (021) 182 5939 Better Health. E:[email protected] W: rwbeachlands.co.nz At Anthony Hunt Dental we have been A:81Second View Avenue, Beachlands East Tamaki proud to be serving our local community since 2011. Creating great smiles and FREE PROPERTY APPRAISAL AND better health for the whole family. MARKET UPDATE AVAILABLE NOW! Uniforms&Promotional Products FollowusonFacebook andInstagram Ray White Beachlands (09) 292 9071 [email protected] Lighthouse Real Estate Limited for specials, competitionsand giveaways 52 Papakura-Clevedon Road Licensed (REAA 2008) Cnr Smales and Springs Rds,EastTamaki-09 265 0300 www.ahdental.co.nz DEADLINES: Display advertising - 5pm Friday. Classifieds and News - midday Monday Ph: 536 5715 Email: [email protected] www.pctimes.nz 2 POHUTUKAWA COAST TIMES (6 September 2019) Guest editorial by Orere Community and Boating Association committee member Tim Greene GET IN TOUCH P: 536 5715 The last few years has seen the resi- scheme.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf Appendix 2.6O Tuakau Structure Built Heritage Assessment Part 2
    Assessment of Effects Strengths Tuakau and the surrounding district have an interesting and diverse history, which connects with national stories, such as those of the 1860s Waikato War and the development of the railways. The history of the area also reflects the contributions made by individuals and families who helped to develop the district through their farming, light industrial, civic, religious and social activities. The Tuakau and Districts Museum is a community asset that can provide a focus for ongoing heritage research, identification and promotion activities. The Waikato District Heritage Strategy identifies the value of historic heritage resources to the community and provides a framework for a coherent and comprehensive approach to the identification, protection and management of these resources. Weaknesses There is currently very limited protection for built heritage resources provided for in the Waikato District Plan (Franklin Section). Rules pertaining to scheduled heritage items are not immediately accessible within either of the District Plans that Waikato Council presently has responsibility for. Opportunities In addition to acknowledging the history of the town and its hinterland, the Structure Plan provides the opportunity, by means of the public notification, hearing and implementation process, to raise the profile of Tuakau’s heritage values. Urban design strategies developed for the Structure Plan area can take account of Tuakau’s historical genesis and consider planning, design and planting actions that acknowledge the history of the area. Threats Loss of built heritage items may result from intensification should a future planning framework fail to provide for the protection of listed items and their surroundings. Extensive residential development could erode the separate identities of Tuakau and Harrisville, whose boundaries are already confused somewhat by the ‘Welcome to Tuakau’ sign that greets motorists as they approach the Harrisville School from the north.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearing Panel
    BEFORE THE AUCKLAND UNITARY PLAN INDEPENDENT HEARING PANEL IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 anD the Local Government (AucklanD TransItIonal ProvIsIons) Act 2010 AND IN THE MATTER of Topic 017 RUB South AND IN THE MATTER of the submIssions set out In the PartIes anD Issues Report ________________________________________________________________ JOINT STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF COLIN EDWARD GEARY MACARTHUR AND DAVID JOHN ROBERT SMITH ON BEHALF OF BOB DEMLER 16 NOVEMBER 2015 ________________________________________________________________ Page 1 of 30 1 SUMMARY 1.1 This Is a joint statement of evIdence prepared by ColIn MacArthur and Dave SmIth of Abley TransportatIon Consultants LImIted (Abley) who have been asked to evaluate the development and consequences of selectIng the Southern RUB for inclusion in the Preliminary AucklanD Unitary Plan, specIfIcally to determIne at a high level, If these processes are suffIcIently robust enough to Demonstrate the outcome represents an effIcIent anD effectIve use of lanD. 1.2 Our analysIs IDentIfIes a number of short comIngs In terms of thoroughness of the evaluation process anD consIDeration of alternative RUB areas that may offer more effIcIent land use than the current proposed Southern RUB. The analysIs demonstrates that greenfIeld development partIcularly in the vicinity of Pukekohe will result in greater adverse Impacts across the AucklanD transport network than alternatIve sites, resulting in less than optimal lanD use anD transportation integration. 1.3 These greater effects wIll necessitate signIfIcant transportatIon infrastructure investment to accommoDate the likely growth in traffic assocIated wIth Pukekohe. At present, these Investments are not planned or funded. 1.4 We concluDe that there remaIns an inaDequate Demonstration of a comprehensive assessment of all viable areas or total construction anD servicing costs, either through the applIcatIon of transportatIon moDellIng or DerIveD from a fIrst prIncIples approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment 5 Local Board Resolutions
    Attachment 5 Local Board Resolutions Contents Albert Eden ............................................................................................................................. 2 Devonport-Takapuna .............................................................................................................. 5 Franklin ................................................................................................................................... 7 Great Barrier ......................................................................................................................... 13 Henderson-Massey ............................................................................................................... 17 Hibiscus and Bays ................................................................................................................ 21 Howick .................................................................................................................................. 28 Kaipatiki ................................................................................................................................ 31 Mangere-Otahuhu ................................................................................................................. 38 Manurewa ............................................................................................................................. 42 Maungakiekie-Tamaki ........................................................................................................... 49 Orakei ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Auckland Progress Results
    Progress Result Issue: Mayor (1) Date: 09/10/2010 Auckland Council Time: 12:23:00 Candidate Affiliation Candidate No Votes Received Rank AUSTIN, Aileen Independent 101 1552 BANKS, John Independent 102 161167 BARR, Marlene Independent 103 692 BRIGHT, Penny 104 2529 BROWN, Len Independent 105 2213651 CHAPMAN, Hugh Independent 106 1878 CRAIG, Colin Independent 107 40483 DAVE, Nga Independent 108 840 FONG, Harry Independent 109 1434 GILLIES, Shannon 110 467 KAHUI, Vinnie 111 1120 MCCULLOCH, Alan Independent 112 1520 MCDONALD, Steve Independent 113 643 NEESON, Vanessa Independent 115 2885 O'CONNOR, Phil Christians Against Abortion 116 1209 PRAST, Simon Independent 117 3578 PRESLAND, Raymond 118 278 ROSS, Mark Independent 119 3076 VERMUNT, Annalucia Communist League 120 427 WILLIAMS, Andrew Independent Progressive Leadership 121 3813 WILLMOTT, David Roads First 122 519 YOUNG, Wayne 123 553 INFORMAL 124 1261 BLANK 125 3752 Progress Result Issue: Rodney Ward (1) Date: 09/10/2010 Auckland Council Time: 12:23:00 Candidate Affiliation Candidate No Votes Received Rank ASHTON, Tom Independent 201 3941 PEREIRA, Vincent Independent 202 444 ROSE, Christine 203 5553 WEBSTER, Penny Independent 204 8063 1 INFORMAL 205 21 BLANK 206 701 Progress Result Issue: Albany Ward (2) Date: 09/10/2010 Auckland Council Time: 12:23:00 Candidate Affiliation Candidate No Votes Received Rank BALOUCH, Uzra Independent 221 736 BELL, Rodney Independent 222 3151 BRADLEY, Ian Independent 223 5273 CONDER, Laurie Independent 224 1419 COOPER, David Independent 225 2821 COOPER,
    [Show full text]
  • South & East Auckland Auckland Airport
    G A p R D D Paremoremo O N R Sunnynook Course EM Y P R 18 U ParemoremoA O H N R D E M Schnapper Rock W S Y W R D O L R SUNSET RD E R L ABERDEEN T I A Castor Bay H H TARGE SUNNYNOOK S Unsworth T T T S Forrest C Heights E O South & East Auckland R G Hill R L Totara Vale R D E A D R 1 R N AIRA O S Matapihi Point F W F U I T Motutapu E U R RD Stony Batter D L Milford Waitemata THE R B O D Island Thompsons Point Historic HI D EN AR KITCHENER RD Waihihi Harbour RE H Hakaimango Point Reserve G Greenhithe R R TRISTRAM Bayview D Kauri Point TAUHINU E Wairau P Korakorahi Point P DIANA DR Valley U IPATIKI CHIVALRY RD HILLSIDERD 1 A R CHARTWELL NZAF Herald K D Lake Takapuna SUNNYBRAE RD SHAKESPEARE RD ase RNZAF T Pupuke t Island 18 Glenfield AVE Takapuna A Auckland nle H Takapuna OCEAN VIEW RD kland a I Golf Course A hi R Beach Golf Course ro O ia PT T a E O Holiday Palm Beach L R HURSTMERE RD W IL D Park D V BEACH HAVEN RD NORTHCOTE R N Beach ARCHERS RD Rangitoto B S P I O B E K A S D A O Island Haven I RD R B R A I R K O L N U R CORONATION RD O E Blackpool H E Hillcrest R D A A K R T N Church Bay Y O B A SM K N D E N R S Birkdale I R G Surfdale MAN O’WAR BAY RD Hobsonville G A D R North Shore A D L K A D E Rangitawhiri Point D E Holiday Park LAK T R R N OCEANRALEIGH VIEW RD I R H E A R E PUPUKE Northcote Hauraki A 18 Y D EXMOUTH RD 2 E Scott Pt D RD L R JUTLAND RD E D A E ORAPIU RD RD S Birkenhead V I W K D E A Belmont W R A L R Hauraki Gulf I MOKO ONEWA R P IA RD D D Waitemata A HINEMOA ST Waiheke LLE RK Taniwhanui Point W PA West Harbour OLD LAKE Golf Course Pakatoa Point L E ST Chatswood BAYSWATER VAUXHALL RD U 1 Harbour QUEEN ST Bayswater RD Narrow C D Motuihe KE NS R Luckens Point Waitemata Neck Island AWAROA RD Chelsea Bay Golf Course Park Point Omiha Motorway .
    [Show full text]
  • Franklin Local Board Agreement 2019/2020 Table of Contents
    Tahua ā-Tau 2019/2020 Annual Budget 2019/2020 Franklin Local Board Agreement 2019/2020 Table of contents Auckland Council Annual Budget 2019/2020 How this Annual Budget is arranged How this Annual Budget is arranged This document is an excerpt of Volume 2 of the Auckland Council Annual Budget 2019/2020. The complete annual budget has two separate volumes. To find out information on a particular area of the council’s work or services, you will need to look in the appropriate volume. Public consultation ran during February and March 2019. This involved around 60 feedback events across the Auckland region. Both written and digital feedback were also encouraged and approximately 6500 pieces of feedback were received. For a summary of the key decisions please visit aucklandcouncil.co.nz from July 2019. This plan was then adopted by the Governing Body on 20 June 2019. Finding your way around the volumes Volume 1: Our plan for 2019/2020 Part one contains our plan for 2019/2020,including a message from the Mayor, key developments across the Auckland Region, and Māori identity and wellbeing. Part two contains our strategic focus areas, key performance measures and financial information for 2019/2020. Part three contains our financial overview, prospective financial statements for 2019/2020, rating policy overview, prospective funding impact statement and other key financial information. Part four contains the summary of the Tūpuna Maunga Authority Operational Plan 2019/2020. Part five contains the structure of and contact information for the council, a glossary of terms and key word index. Volume 2: Local Board information and agreements Part one provides information on local boards and a summary of planned expenditure for 2019/2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Overview - Pokeno & District
    WDC District Plan Review – Built Heritage Assessment Historic Overview - Pokeno & District Pokeno The fertile valley floor in the vicinity of Pokeno has most likely been occupied by Maori since the earliest days of their settlement of Aotearoa. Pokeno is geographically close to the Tamaki isthmus, the lower Waikato River and the Hauraki Plains, all areas densely occupied by Maori in pre-European times. Traditionally, iwi of Waikato have claimed ownership of the area. Prior to and following 1840, that iwi was Ngati Tamaoho, including the hapu of Te Akitai and Te Uri-a-Tapa. The town’s name derives from the Maori village of Pokino located north of the present town centre, which ceased to exist on the eve of General Cameron’s invasion of the Waikato in July 1863. In the early 1820s the area was repeatedly swept by Nga Puhi war parties under Hongi Hika, the first of several forces to move through the area during the inter-tribal wars of the 1820s and 1830s. It is likely that the hapu of Pokeno joined Ngati Tamaoho war parties that travelled north to attack Nga Puhi and other tribes.1 In 1822 Hongi Hika and a force of around 3000 warriors, many armed with muskets, made an epic journey south from the Bay of Islands into the Waikato. The journey involved the portage of large war waka across the Tamaki isthmus and between the Waiuku River and the headwaters of the Awaroa and hence into the Waikato River west of Pokeno. It is likely warriors from the Pokeno area were among Waikato people who felled large trees across the Awaroa River to slow Hika’s progress.
    [Show full text]
  • VOLUME 1 Rural Fire Force and Community Volunteers, the Mayor and Principal Rural Fire Officer at the Groundbreaking for the New Hunua Fire Station
    Franklin District Council Community Plan 2009 - 2019 WORKING TOGETHER FOR OUR FUTURE VOLUME 1 Rural fire force and community volunteers, the Mayor and Principal Rural Fire Officer at the groundbreaking for the new Hunua Fire Station. CONTENTS From the Mayor and CEO . 3 Representing You . 4 Management Team . 5 District Profile . 6 Key Decisions . 7 Guide to this Plan . 8 Community Outcomes . 9 Financial Overview . 15 Summary Financial Statements . 16 Funding Impact Statement . 20 Significant Assumptions . 28 Statement Of Accounting Policies . 34 Leading the Franklin District Strategic Planning and Policy . 44 Representation . 48 Growing the Franklin Economy Economic Development . 53 Town Centre Management . 57 Moving Around Franklin Transportation . 63 1 Protecting the Franklin Environment Emergency Management . 74 Regulatory . 78 Solid Waste . 83 Stormwater . 88 Wastewater . 97 Water Supply . 104 Living and Playing in Franklin Arts and Culture and Heritage . 118 Community Services . 122 Community Facilities . 128 Open Spaces . 135 Support Communications . 145 Corporate Property . 147 Corporate Support . 149 Financial Statements Income Statement . 156 Statement of Financial Position . 157 Statement of Movement in Equity . 158 Statement of Cash Flows . 159 Other Supporting Financial Information . 160 Glossary . 164 Appendix A Community Outcomes Indicators and Measures 2006 - 2009 . 166 Appendix B Auditor’s Letter . 169 2 3 FROM THE MAYOR AND CEO Community Plan 2009-19 has been a massive but satisfying task. It Council Accommodation Building – This project has been is fair to say that this work was made more difficult by two external removed from the Plan. factors: the world wide economic downturn and the changes to Auckland governance following the report of the Royal Commission Wastewater Funding Policy – The policy for this activity has been Mark Ball Sally Davis on Auckland Governance.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.3 Franklin Local Board
    Part 2: Local Board information and agreements 2.3 Franklin Local Board 2.3 Franklin Local Board Message from the Chair I am pleased to present the Franklin Local Board Agreement for 2018/2019, which captures how we will deliver on the Franklin Local Board Plan 2017-2020 and comes after feedback from our communities through the recent “Have Your Say” consultation. Franklin communities are clear that transport is the priority issue. The Franklin Local Board will continue to seek improved transport choices, fit for purpose roads, and transport projects that will cater for the Franklin of the future. We will continue to support the generation of local prosperity, supporting projects like the Hunua Trail, which will generate tourism activity. We will facilitate opportunities for our young job-seekers and support our business communities to respond to new growth possibilities. We will enhance, protect and maintain our environment by leveraging local benefit from new water quality and pest management targeted rate initiatives and the waste management and minimisation plan, and we will support Kauri dieback prevention in the Hunua Ranges. We will support new waste minimisation facilities and programmes addressing illegal dumping and littering. We will invest in community-led projects that create better connection to and through our environment, such as the Waiuku, Pohutukawa Coast and Pukekohe trails, and in outdoor spaces and community facilities that cater for growth, like the Karaka Sports Park. We look forward to continuing our work with our communities and local businesses. Angela Fulljames Chair of Franklin Local Board Auckland Council 10-year Budget 2018-2028, Volume 3 of 3 Part 2: Local Board information and agreements 2.3 Franklin Local Board Introduction Auckland Council’s shared governance model means local boards are responsible for decision-making on local issues, activities and services and providing input into regional strategies, policies and plans.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Evidence Provided in Support of Counties Power Limited's
    Supplementary evidence provided in support of Counties Power Limited's presentation to the Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearings Panel in respect of Topic 016/017 RUB North/West and RUB South IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of Proposed Plan Change 12 to the Auckland Council District Plan: Papakura Section, Proposed Private Plan Change 38 to the Auckland Council District Plan: Franklin Section, Proposed Plan Change 19 to the Auckland Regional Policy Statement, ( ) and Proposed Plan Change 3 to the Auckland Council Regional Plan: Air, Land, and Water STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE BY MAURICE HOSKINS FOR COUNTIES POWER LIMITED Introduction 1. My full name is Maurice Max Hoskins and I am the Planning Engineer with Counties Power Limited. I hold the degrees of Bachelor of Science and Bachelor of Engineering (Hons) from the University of Canterbury and Certificate of Electrical Engineering Supply. I have practised as an Electrical Engineer for 38 years working in New Zealand, 2 years in the United Kingdom and 2 years in Saudi Arabia. 2. I was appointed as the Planning Engineer in 1994 and as such I am responsible for the medium and long term planning of the power system in Counties Power. Particular emphasis in this role is placed on the planning of subtransmission, substations and distribution feeders. 3. The purpose of my evidence is to outline the wider significance of the 11 OkV lines that run through the Drury South Structure Plan (DSSP) area, to confirm the difference between supplying a new industrial area and a new residential area, to provide a brief overview of how Counties Power intends to supply power to the DSSP area, and to confirm the importance of retaining flexibility with respect to these distribution lines.
    [Show full text]