DOCSLIB.ORG

Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania Clonal Sncittn oi Casmanhi. ABSTRACT OF PHOCEELINaS, APPwIL 29th, 1902. A meeting of the Eoyal Socie!;y of Tas- and expansive beyond any limit they mania was held on Tuesday evening, April could assign to it.'" The Fellows had 29, 1902, in the society^s new room, Argyle- done very well so far. They had got s'treet. The President, His Excellency natural history specimens, and a fairly the GrOTernor, Sir Arthur Havelook, good rep.resantation of art, and, on tlie G.C.S.I., G.'C.M.G., presided. The Go- whole, he thought the institution would vernor was accompanied by Lady Have- compare favourably with any institution lock and Captain Gaskell, A.D.C. in the other States. But they could say now. as the secretary said in 18o7, that the Welcome to the New President. society must be cumulative and expan- sive beyond any limit thsy could a».-ign The Hon. Nicholas J. Brown, Speaker to it. Its first expansion now should be of the House of Assembly, and Vice-Presi- in the direction of the securing and equip- dent of the Eoyal Society, said he was ment of a Techuological museum. I'hat charged with a duty of a y&i:y pleasant seemed to be necessary, in view of the an- character. He had, on behalf of the ticipations that, in the near fature, Tas- Fellows of the Eoyal Society, to welcome mania would become an important manu- His Excellency on that, the first, occasion facturing and distributing centre for the of fTiS presiding at a meeting of the Eel- whole of Australia. Technical instruc- lows. According to the charter of the tion was being imparted in our schools, society, the representative of His 'Majesty and he hoped that technical knowledge the King was, ex officio. President of the would progress. But 'a Tecl^nol^g!:'al Eoyal Society of Tasmania, a privilege museum was a very important tuing which, he believea, was not included in to have at our command. While the charter of any other Eoyal Society in welcoming His Excellency to the Australia. They knew, from, ample evi- Eoyal Society, ihe ventured to express dence, since His Excellency's arrival m a hope that, while it was certain Tasmania, that he took a very warm and that the present moiment was not an sj'mpathetic interest in the welfare of this opporttine one at which to discuss heavy State, and the Fellows of the siociety expenditure, yet they believed the pre- hoped that His Excellency would derive sent difficulties would rioU away, and that pleasure from his 'association with th'at His Excellency's tenure of office, as society. They felt confident the society Governor, and as President of the Society, vroald derive great advantage, encourage- might be signalised by the addition of a ment, and assistance from His Excel- Technological m'useum to the National lency's ass'ociatioin with the society from Museum of Tasmania. He extended to time to time. He desired briefly to al- His Excellency a very cordial welcome on lude to a few instances in the past his- belhalf of the Fellows of the Society. (Ap- tory of the society. In the early days of plause.) its existence, considerable difficulty arose His Excelleaicy the Governor said fie regarding land for its use. One Govern- begged the Fellows to accept his very sin- ment after another promised land, but a cere thanks for the extremely kind terms great deal 'of correspondence took pla3e, which they had extended to him. and a few years ago they found that their He felt proud to occupy tlie chair whidh title to a portion of tihe land supposed to had been occupied by John Franklin, Wil- be obtained was doubtful. Tlie recoirds liam Denison, and Eobert Hamilton. (Ap- of the siociety were searched, and a state- plause.) He was unprepared for the sug- ment was prepared, showing beyond all gestion that was thrown out by the Vice- doubt, that while it was the general in- President, but (for the short time he had tention to' grant the society a large block had to reflect upon it) it seemed to be one of land, including Franklin-square, ultim- that deserved consideration. He trusted ately the land given was confined to the that before his time wa:s over, the idea block between Macquarie - street and Da- might be carried into practice. He vey-street, now occupied by the society. tlianked them once more for their kind Their title to that larg» ajea of land -was Trel'oome, and they would now proceed to now assured, but he desired to refer par- the business of the evening. (Applause.) ticularly to a letter found in the corre- spondence written by the early secretary, New Fellows. in which he spoke cf the necessity for Major E. C. Lewis, D.S.O., and Dr. ample space being reser'ped to the society. E. E. Whishaw, and Mr. Horace Watson, He S'aid the society "must be cumulative were elected Fellows of tfie society. — Apologies. arctic investigators; Sir Joseph Hooker, the great botanist; Sir George <}rey, tlie Apologies for unavoidable absence were eminent colonial statesman and poli- received from the Aichbishop of H )!)a.rt, tician; the Keverend Mr. Colenso, the ar- Mr. T. Stephens. M.A.. F.G.S., fuul Mr. dent naturalist; the Reverend Di. Lillie. L. Kod way. an eminent scholar and divine; Sir Thomas Mitchell, the Australian ex- PiesiJent's Address. plorer. I could greatly prolong the list. His Excellency the Governor, as Pres'i- but I fear to weary you. The names I deut, deliveied the followiug presidential have recalled to you are probably already addres's : — growing faint in the memory of the pie- Mr. Vice - President, members of sent generation. But the roll of the so- the Council, and Fellows of the ciety contains one name which is fresh in Koyal Society, — Among the many all our minds and hearts—that of Sir honourable and agieeab/le positions James Agnew, w'hose keen intellect, and held by the Governor of Tasmania, there whose warm poAver of sympathetic in- is none more honourable, none moie agree- terest, pervade the whole history of the able, than that of President of the l\'oyal societ.v. from its earliest days, sixty years Society of Tasmania. Not only can the ago, until November of last .year, when he Royal Society claim to be one of the oldest was called to his lest. All Tasmania owes scientific bodies of Australasia, but it may Sir James Agnew a deep debt of grati- also justly pride itself on having contri- tude for the good deeds, for the open-hand- buted largely to the stores of science and ed munificence, and for the noble example, research' which have been laid up in this by which, during a long life, he helped to great Southern Doriiinion, The societrj' raise the character of her people, to cheer had its beginning in an informal as-socia- their hearts, and to brighten their lives. lion, of Sir Joliu Franklin and of men Tasmania and her Royal Society need no among his friends and acquaintances, who visible monument to keep alive their re- shared with him his love of knowledge and membrance of Sir James Agnew. But. if of inquiiy. Under Sir John Franklin's they did, it may be found in marble, in care, this association grew, until in 18-11. the beautiful work of the sculptor's art. before he relinquished his office of Gover- which adorns the Art Gallery of our nor, it was foimed into an organised so- Museum, and "which he has bequeathed to ciety, called the Tasmanian Society. But, Tasmania. The Honourable C. H. Giant it was not until three years later, when and Dr. Bright, who passsd away only a Sir John Franklin had left the co'lony. few weeks before Sir James Agnew\ have that the institution which he had brought left also a record of earnest and success- into being, and which he had iso lovingly ful work, in the service of the objects of cherished, reached its fulness of strength the Royal Society, and of high aims for and dignity. On the 12Lh September. 1844. the improvement of the community among Sir J. E, Eaidley-Wilmor, Sir .Tohii whom they lived and laboured. And now. Franklin's succe-sor in the Government before I c'lose my testimony, which I feel of Tasmania, was able to proclaim that to be inadequate and impel feet, to the the Royal So':iety. with an approved con- zeal, the perseverance, and the ability stitution, and witli a grant of i.'4-OO a year which have been devoted to the further- from publi.- funds, had been formally es- ance of the objects of the society. I should tablished. At the same time, the Gover- not be doing justice to my subject, if I nor was authorised *"o make the auspicious were to omit the name of our secretary, announcement that Her Majesty the Mr. Alexander Morton. I have hardly yet Queen had signified her consent to be Pat- ceased to be a stranger among you. But, ron of the society. For fifty-eight years already, the assiduity, the tact, the power until by death the Empire lost the noblest of organisation, which Mr. Morton has and be-t Sovereign that has ever been l>rought to bear upon the promotion of the Eoyal Societv continued to hold and the interests of the Royal Society in par- treasure this signal mark of honour.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PDF File Created from a TIFF Image by Tiff2pdf
    ~. ~. ~••r __._ .,'__, __----., The National Ubrary supplies copies of this article under licence from the Copyright Agency Limited (GAL). Further reproductions of this' article can only be made under licence. ·111111111111 200003177 . J The Last Man: The mutilation ofWilliam Lanne in 1869 and its aftermath Stefan Petrow Regarding the story of King Billy's Head, there are so many versions of it that it might be as well if you sent rhe correct details.! In 1869 William Lanne, the last 'full-blooded' Tasmanian Aboriginal male, died.2 Lying in the Hobart Town General Hospital, his dead body was mutilated by scientists com­ peting for the right to secure the skeleton. The first mutilation by Dr. William Lodewyk Crowther removed Lanne's head. The second mutilation by Dr. George Stokell and oth­ ers removed Lanne's hands and feet. After Lanne's burial, Stokell and his colleagues removed Lanne's body from his grave before Crowther and his party could do the same. Lanne's skull and body were never reunited. They were guarded jealously by the respective mutilators in the interests of science. By donating Lanne's skeleton, Crowther wanted to curry favour with the prestigious Royal College of Surgeons in London, while Stokell, anxious to retain his position as house-surgeon at the general hospital, wanted to cultivate good relations with the powerful men associated with the Royal Society of Tasmania. But, perhaps because of the scandal associated with the mutilation, no scientific study of Lanne's skull or skeleton was ever published or, as far as we know, even attempted.
    [Show full text]
  • SIR JAMES AGNEW, K.C.M.G., M.D., M.E.G. ©Bititarn*
    SIR JAMES AGNEW, K.C.M.G., M.D., M.E.G. ©bititarn* Sir James Wilson Agnew, K.C.M.G., M.D., M.E.C., Senior Vice-President of the Royal Society of Tas- mania. Died on cSth November, 1901, in the 87th year of his age. —Born at Ballyclare, Ireland, on the 2nd October, 1815, he studied for the medical profession in London and Paris, and at Glas^^-ow, where he graduated M.D., as his father and grandfather had done before him, and came to Australia in 1839. After a short stay in New South Wales and Victoria (then known as Port Phillip), he accepted from Sir John Franklin the offer of appointment as medical officer to an important station at Tasman's Peninsula, wliere he devoted the greater part of his leisure time to the study of natural history. Prior to his removal to Hobart for the more extended practice of his profession, in which he sub- sequently attained a position of acknowledged eminence, he had assisted in founding the Tasmanian Societ}^, and lie became an active member of the Royal Society, into which the former Society merged in 1844. Shortly after the retirement of Dr. Milligan, its Secretary and Curator, in 1860, he undertook the duties of Seci'etary as a labour of love, in order that the whole of the limited amount available out of income might be appropriated as salary for the Curator of the Museum. From that time on- wards, except during occasional periods of absence from Tasmania, he continued to act as chief executive officer of the Royal Society in the capacity of Honorary Secretary for many years, and latterly in that of Chairman of the Council ; and to the admirable manner in which those self-imposed duties were discharo-ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Tasmanian Water Right Legislation 1877-1885: a Tortuous Process
    Journal of Australasian Mining History, Vol. 15, 2017 Development of Tasmanian water right legislation 1877-1885: a tortuous process By KEITH PRESTON rior to the Australian gold rushes of the 1850s, a right to water was governed by the riparian doctrine, a common law principle of entitlement that was established P in Great Britain during the 15th and 16th centuries.1 Water entitlements were tied to land ownership whereby the occupant could access a watercourse flowing through a landholding or along its boundary. This doctrine was introduced to New South Wales and Van Diemen’s Land in 1828 with the passing of the Australian Courts Act (9 Geo. No. 4) that transferred ‘all laws and statutes in force in the realm of England’.2 The riparian doctrine became part of New South Wales common law following a Supreme Court ruling in 1859.3 During the Californian and Victorian gold rushes, the principle of prior appropriation was established to protect the rights of mining leaseholders on crown land but riparian rights were retained for other users, particularly for irrigation of private land. The principle of prior appropriation was based on first possession, which established priority when later users obtained water from a common source, although these rights could be traded and were a valuable asset in the regulation of water supply to competing claims on mining fields.4 In Tasmania, disputes over water rights between 1881-85 challenged the application of these two doctrines, forcing repeated revision of legislation. The Tasmanian Parliament passed the first gold mining legislation in September 1859, eight years after the first gold rushes in Victoria and New South Wales, which marked the widespread introduction of alluvial mining in Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Melbourne Club Address 12Th Aug 09
    J Michael M Youl The success of his experiment may have been the TASMANIAN Club address 6 July 2012 fore runner to storing animal and human semen and storing animal and human fertile eggs, IVF and so Good evening Gentlemen on [now I’m really out of my depth]. In the 1850’s and 60’s there was a strong desire by Packaging took a great deal of sorting out. James colonist in Tasmania and Victoria to introduce Youl spent 10 years to find the right mix. His Atlantic salmon [ salmo salar ] to our beautiful experiments to retard hatching were carried out at clean and clear rivers the Crystal Palace, London, using ice from the Wenham Ice Co. Boston USA. The first attempt to transport Salmon ova was by Gottlieb Boccius in 1852 aboard the “Columbus”. The Tasmanian Government announced a reward of Wooden Troughs holding 60 gallons of water were 500 pounds in 1857 for the introduction of live slung gimbal style amid-ship, hoping the little ova Atlantic salmon [not live ova]. That was little would handle the sea trip. The experiment failed the support for JAY. water temperature was not controlled plus the ova Edward Wilson who was a part-owner and editor of had no protection The Argus newspaper in Melbourne, and also founded the Acclimatisation Society of Victoria As James Youl is prominent in my address tonight persuaded the Society to offer 600 pounds to his I’ll provide his back ground. good friend James Youl to organize and manage a He was born Dec.
    [Show full text]
  • Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania
    C-( : ,i; [Mitn'i PAPERS & PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OP TASMANIA, • ^ FOR THE YEARS I 898- I 899. (ISSUED JUNE, 1900. (Bf^^^ ^^V0% ®aamania PRINTED BY DAVIKS BROTHERS LIMITED, MACQUARIE STREET, HOBART, 1900. The responsibility of the Statements and Opinions given in the following Papers and Discussions rests with the individual Authors; the Society as a body merely places them on record. : : : ROYAL SOCIETY OF TASMANIA. -»o>0{oo- Patroti HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN. HIS EXCELLENCY VISCOUNT GORMANSTON, G.C.M.G. THE HON. SIR JAMES WILSON AGNEW, K.C.M.G., M.D., M.E.C. R. M. JOHNSTON, ESQ., F.S.S. THOMAS STEPHENS, ESQ., MA., F.G.S. HIS LORDSHIP THE BISHOP OF TASMANIA. C^OtXttCii : * T. STEPHENS, ESQ., M.A., F.G.S. * C. J. BARCLAY, ESQ. " R. S. BRIGHT. ESQ., M.R.C.S.E. * A. G. WEBSTER, ESQ. HIS LORDSHIP THE BISHOP OF TASMANIA. RUSSELL YOUNG, ESQ. HON. C. H. GRANT, M.E.C. BERNARD SHAW, ESQ. COL. W. V. LEGGE, R.A. R. M. JOHNSTON, ESQ., F.L.S. HON. N. J. BROWN, M.E.C. HON. SIR J. W. AGNEW, K.C.M.G., M.D., M.E.C. llttMtor of ^ccnunU: R. M. JOHNSTON, ESQ., F.S.S. Hon. eTreajstirer C. J. BARCLAY, ESQ. ^ecretarg anti librarian ALEXANDER MORTON. * Members who next retire in rotation . ^onimt^. A. Page. A.A.A.S. Congratulations ... ... ... ... ... ... xvii A.A.A.S. 1902 Meeting. Deputation to the Government Novem- ber2nd, 1899 LVii Agnew, Sir James, Unveiling a Portrait of... .. ... ... xxxviii Agnew, Sir James, Letter from .
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 39, Issue 1
    History of Anthropology Newsletter Volume 39 Issue 1 June 2012 Article 1 January 2012 Volume 39, Issue 1 Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/han Part of the Anthropology Commons, and the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons Recommended Citation (2012) "Volume 39, Issue 1," History of Anthropology Newsletter: Vol. 39 : Iss. 1 , Article 1. Available at: https://repository.upenn.edu/han/vol39/iss1/1 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/han/vol39/iss1/1 For more information, please contact [email protected]. HISTORY OF ANTHROPOLOGY NEWSLETTER VOLUME 39.1 JUNE 2012 History of Anthropology Newsletter 39.1 (June 2012) / 1 HISTORY OF ANTHROPOLOGY NEWSLETTER VOLUME 39, NUMBER 1 JUNE 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS The Utilization of Truganini’s Human Remains in Colonial Tasmania Antje Kühnast 3 Recent Bibliography, Websites of Interest, and Conference Report 12 19 Prize Announcement and Three Societies Conference Session of Interest 14 History of Anthropology Newsletter 39.1 (June 2012) / 2 EDITORIAL COMMITTEE Henrika Kuklick, Editor [email protected] Peter Collopy, Assistant Editor [email protected] Matthew Hoffarth, Assistant Editor [email protected] Joanna Radin, Assistant Editor [email protected] Adrian Young, Assistant Editor [email protected] CORRESPONDING CONTRIBUTORS Ira Bashkow [email protected] Regna Darnell [email protected] Nélia Dias [email protected] Lise Dobrin [email protected] Christian Feest [email protected] Andre Gingrich [email protected] Robert Gordon [email protected] Curtis Hinsley [email protected] Edgardo Krebs [email protected] Esteban Krotz [email protected] H.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mutilation of William Lanne in 1869 and Its Aftermath
    The Last Man: The mutilation of William Lanne in 1869 and its aftermath Stefan Petrow Regarding the story of King Billy's Head, there are so many versions of it that it might be as well if you sent the correct details} In 1869 William Lanne, the last 'full-blooded' Tasmanian Aboriginal male, died.1 2 Lying in the Hobart Town General Hospital, his dead body was mutilated by scientists com­ peting for the right to secure the skeleton. The first mutilation by Dr. William Lodewyk Crowther removed Lanne's head. The second mutilation by Dr. George Stokell and oth­ ers removed Lanne's hands and feet. After Lanne's burial, Stokell and his colleagues removed Lanne's body from his grave before Crowther and his party could do the same. Lanne's skull and body were never reunited. They were guarded jealously by the respective mutilators in the interests of science. By donating Lanne's skeleton, Crowther wanted to curry favour with the prestigious Royal College of Surgeons in London, while Stokell, anxious to retain his position as house-surgeon at the general hospital, wanted to cultivate good relations with the powerful men associated with the Royal Society of Tasmania. But, perhaps because of the scandal associated with the mutilation, no scientific study of Lanne's skull or skeleton was ever published or, as far as we know, even attempted. It seems that Lanne was mutilated to satisfy the egos and 'personal ambition' of desperate men, who wanted a memento of Tasmania's last man, as the newspapers of the time called him.3 Unsurprisingly, the Lanne affair has held an enduring fascination for scholars of Tasmanian history.4 Lanne's mutilation symbolised the dispossession of land from the Tasmanian Aboriginals and its carving up by racially intolerant and violent white set­ tlers, generally indifferent to the rights of the indigenous population.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF File Created from a TIFF Image by Tiff2pdf
    ~. ~. ~••r __._ .,'__, __----., The National Ubrary supplies copies of this article under licence from the Copyright Agency Limited (GAL). Further reproductions of this' article can only be made under licence. ·111111111111 200003177 . J The Last Man: The mutilation ofWilliam Lanne in 1869 and its aftermath Stefan Petrow Regarding the story of King Billy's Head, there are so many versions of it that it might be as well if you sent rhe correct details.! In 1869 William Lanne, the last 'full-blooded' Tasmanian Aboriginal male, died.2 Lying in the Hobart Town General Hospital, his dead body was mutilated by scientists com­ peting for the right to secure the skeleton. The first mutilation by Dr. William Lodewyk Crowther removed Lanne's head. The second mutilation by Dr. George Stokell and oth­ ers removed Lanne's hands and feet. After Lanne's burial, Stokell and his colleagues removed Lanne's body from his grave before Crowther and his party could do the same. Lanne's skull and body were never reunited. They were guarded jealously by the respective mutilators in the interests of science. By donating Lanne's skeleton, Crowther wanted to curry favour with the prestigious Royal College of Surgeons in London, while Stokell, anxious to retain his position as house-surgeon at the general hospital, wanted to cultivate good relations with the powerful men associated with the Royal Society of Tasmania. But, perhaps because of the scandal associated with the mutilation, no scientific study of Lanne's skull or skeleton was ever published or, as far as we know, even attempted.
    [Show full text]
  • TASMANIAN HISTORY and the ROYAL SOCIETY of TASMANIA 1899-1927 by Stefan Petrow
    Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania, Volume 137, 2003 67 THE ANTIQUARIAN MIND: TASMANIAN HISTORY AND THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF TASMANIA 1899-1927 by Stefan Petrow PETROW, S., 2003 (19: xii): The antiquarian mind: Tasmanian history and the Royal Society of Tasmania 1899-1927. Papers and Pro­ ceedings of the Royal Sociery of Tasmania, 137: 67-74. https://doi.org/10.26749/rstpp.137.67 ISSN 0080-4703. School of History and Classics, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 81, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia. Between 1899 and 1904, and again between 1921 and 1927, enthusiasts of Tasmanian history formed the Historical Section of the Royal Society of Tasmania. They sought to highlight Tasmania's rich historical traditions. They were especially interested in the deeds of foundation heroes such as explorers, governors and pioneers, but tended to ignore convict and Aboriginal history. They sought to preserve historical documents, save existing monuments and erect new monuments to their heroes, celebrate key events in Tasmania's past, and ensure places were given suitably historical names. They held lectures and published papers on their favourite aspects of Tasmanian his­ tory. They believed that history could teach valuable lessons if properly studied. This paper considers the activities of history enthusiasts in Hobart and Launceston and concludes that in small ways these enthusiasts contributed to an understanding of Tasmania's past and helped to create a public awareness of early Tasmanian achievements. Key Words: commemoration, historical documents, historical consciousness, memorials, Royal Society of Tasmania, Tasmanian history. INTRODUCTION Nonconformity, education and charities for the poor.
    [Show full text]
  • With Some Account of Earlier Institutions and Societies in Tasmania
    — THE FOUNDATION AND EARLY WORK OF THE SOCIETY ; WITH SOME ACCOUNT OF EARLIER INSTITUTIONS AND SOCIETIES IN TASMANIA. (Plates xiji. - xx.) By E. L. Piesse, B.Sc, LL.B., Houorarj Acting Secretarv. (Read on 13tli October, 1913, at a Meeting held in cele- bration of the Seventieth Anniversary of the Society.) I. Earlier Institutions and Societies The Van Diemen's Land Agricultural Society (1821) 118 The Ian Diemens Juand Scientific Society iV^t^) 119 The Colonial Gardens (1818) ... ... ... 1-20 The Mechanics' histitution of Holart (1826) ... 123 The Hohart Town Horticultural Society (1839) 123 The T^asvianian Society (1838) ... ... ... 124 The Franklin Museum, Ancanihe (1842) ... 131 The Terniinaiion of Sir fohn Franklin's Goveimor- ship ... 133 IL — 27z^ Royal Society of Tasmania, 1843-8 The Foundation of the Society, 14th Oct., 1843 136 The Society /ram 1843 to 1848 142 The Tasrnanian Society, 1848-8 ... ... 146 111.— The Society from 1848 to 1863 The Expansion of the Society, 1848 147 The Membership 152 The Museum and Library ... ... ... 153 The Papers and Froceedifigs ... ... ... 157 The Gardens 157 Meteorological Observations ... ... ... 159 International Exliibitio7ts ... ... ... 159 Fisheries ... ... ... ... ... ... 159 The Secretaries ... ... ... ... ... 160 The New Museum 160 Appe7idix. — The Tasmanian Society in August, 1843 ... 162 The Inaugural Meeting, Vith October, 1843 ... 163 List of Officers 166 — 118 FOUNDATION AND EARLY WORK R.S. TA3. The completion of the sev2ntieth year of tha Royal Society of Tasmania is a fitting occasion for an account of its foundation and early work. If not the oldest scien- tific society in Australia, it is at all events the only one whose work and publications have been unbroken for seventy years (1); and the circumstances of its origin will be of interest to many besides iis present members.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Parks
    The Politics of Parks A History of Tasmania’s National Parks 1885-2005 Debbie Quarmby BA (Social Work) Postgraduate Diploma (Public History) This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Murdoch University 2006 Acknowledgements: The author is grateful for the valuable contributions to this thesis made by: Librarians at the Archives Office of Tasmania, DPIWE library, Tasmanian State, Parliamentary and University libraries; The Tasmanian Environment Centre; Interviewees (listed in the Bibliography); DPIWE staff who assisted with maps and data; Family and friends who proof-read and helped in many ways, and Murdoch University, particularly my supervisor Dr. Lenore Layman. Declaration I declare that this thesis is my own account of my research and contains as its main content work which has not previously been submitted for a degree at any tertiary education institution. Debbie Quarmby Contents Page Abstract i Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Part 1 Gentlemanly Accommodations: Politics of Consensus Chapter 2 Naturalists and Tourism Promoters form a Tasmanian National Parks Movement 31 Chapter 3 Success for Tasmania’s National Park Movement 63 Part 2 The Scenery Preservation Board: Compromise and Loss for National Parks Chapter 4 Between the Wars, 1920-1940: The Initial National Parks Movement Wanes 94 Chapter 5 Growing Conflict, Inadequacy and the Florentine Failure: The Scenery Preservation Board in the 1940s and 1950s 118 Chapter 6 The 1960s: The Beginning of Modern Environmentalism and Fall of the Scenery Preservation Board
    [Show full text]
  • 'I Succeeded Once': the Aboriginal Protectorate on the Mornington Peninsula,1839–1840
    ‘I Succeeded Once’: The Aboriginal Protectorate on the Mornington Peninsula, 1839–1840 ‘I Succeeded Once’: The Aboriginal Protectorate on the Mornington Peninsula, 1839–1840 Marie Hansen Fels THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY E PRESS E PRESS Published by ANU E Press and Aboriginal History Incorporated Aboriginal History Monograph 22 This title is also available online at: http://epress.anu.edu.au/succeeded_once_citation.html National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Author: Fels, Marie Hansen, 1938- Title: ‘I succeeded once’ : the Aboriginal Protectorate on the Mornington Peninsula, 1839-1840 / Marie Fels. ISBN: 9781921862120 (pbk.) 978192186137 (ebook) Series: Aboriginal history monograph ; 22 Notes: Includes bibliographical references. Subjects: Thomas, William, 1791-1867. Aboriginal Australians--Victoria--Mornington Peninsula--History. Mornington Peninsula (Vic.)--History. Dewey Number: 994.500499152 Aboriginal History Incorporated Aboriginal History is administered by an Editorial Board which is responsible for all unsigned material. Views and opinions expressed by the author are not necessarily shared by Board members. The Committee of Management and the Editorial Board Kaye Price (Chair), Peter Read (Monographs Editor), Maria Nugent and Shino Konishi (Journal Editors), Robert Paton (Treasurer and Public Officer), Anne McGrath (Deputy Chair), Isabel McBryde, Niel Gunson, Luise Hercus, Harold Koch, Christine Hansen, Tikka Wilson, Geoff Gray, Jay Arthur, Dave Johnson, Ingereth Macfarlane, Brian Egloff, Lorena Kanellopoulos, Richard Baker, Peter Radoll. Contacting Aboriginal History All correspondence should be addressed to Aboriginal History, Box 2837 GPO Canberra, 2601, Australia. Sales and orders for journals and monographs, and journal subscriptions: Thelma Sims, email: Thelma.Sims@ anu.edu.au, tel or fax: +61 2 6125 3269, www.aboriginalhistory.org Aboriginal History Inc.
    [Show full text]